Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Sorafenib has soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitory activity, which contributes to its effect profile in vivo

Jun-Yan Liu, See-Hyoung Park, Christophe Morisseau, Sung Hee Hwang, Bruce D. Hammock and Robert H. Weiss
Jun-Yan Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
See-Hyoung Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Morisseau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sung Hee Hwang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce D. Hammock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert H. Weiss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0119 Published August 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Structural similarity of sorafenib (A), dCP2PU (B), and t-AUCB (C; B and C are potent soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors; refs. 33, 54). The compound B (dCP2PU) is 1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(4-phenoxyphenyl)urea and C (t-AUCB) is trans-4-[4-(3-adamantan-1-yl-ureido)-cyclohexyloxy]-benzoic acid, respectively.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Determination of the KI of sorafenib with the human soluble epoxide hydrolase (1 nmol/L) using [3H]-t-DPPO as substrate. For each substrate concentration (3.6–30.0 μmol/L), the velocity is plotted as a function of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor concentration (0–15 nmol/L), allowing the determination of an apparent inhibition constant (KIapp). KIapps are plotted as a function of the substrate concentration (inset). For [S] = 0, a KI value of 17 nmol/L was found. Similar plots were obtained with four other inhibitors and the human soluble epoxide hydrolase (see Table 1).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Docking sorafenib with the human soluble epoxide hydrolase enzyme. Sorafenib was manually docked into the active site of human soluble epoxide hydrolase. For this, we used the published X-ray crystal structure of human soluble epoxide hydrolase complex with a urea-based soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor (Protein Data Bank accession number 1ZD3) from http://www.rcsb.org. Between two plausible binding modes for sorafenib, the orientation given herein is the one with the lower calculated enthalpy and thus is the most probable. The opposite binding mode resulted in steric clashes with the residues of the binding site, such as Met418. Sorafenib was bound by making H-bonding interactions between the urea group and the residues Tyr381, Tyr465, and Asp333 at the active site of the human soluble epoxide hydrolase enzyme. These amino acids are shown as ball-and-stick structures on the backbone ribbon diagram.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Conventional soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors of varying potency do not cause significant apoptosis or attenuate phosphorylation of ERK or VEGF receptor. A, ACHN and A498 cells were serum starved for 18 h and treated with vehicle (QM lane is serum-free quiescence media alone; vehicle is DMSO at1 μL/ml), platelet-derived growth factor, PD98059 (10 μmol/L), sorafenib (10 μmol/L), and soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors (10 μmol/L) for 1 h. After incubation, all cells except quiescence media control were stimulated with platelet-derived growth factor (10 ng/mL) for 15 min. Cells were harvested and immunoblotted with phospho-ERK (202Tyr204Thr) or nonphosphorylated ERK, as indicated. β-Actin is a gel loading control. B, ACHN cells were treated as in A, except that the soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors were treated at three different doses, as indicated. C, ACHN cells were treated in 10% serum-containing complete media with vehicle (DMSO at 1 μL/mL), PD98059 (10 μmol/L), sorafenib (10 μmol/L), and soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors (10 μmol/L) for 24 and 48 h. After incubation, cells were harvested and immunoblotted with phospho-VEGF receptor, VEGF receptor, and PARP. PARP activation is indicated by the appearance of the lower–molecular weight cleavage product. β-Actin is a gel loading control.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Conventional soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors of varying potency do not alter cell growth or apoptosis. ACHN and A498 cells were incubated with serum-free quiescence media for 18 h and then treated with 10% serum-containing media containing vehicle (DMSO; 1 μL/mL), sorafenib (10 μmol/L), and indicated soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors (10 μmol/L) for an additional 48 h. A, an MTT assay was done as described in Materials and Methods. The visible absorbance of each well was quantified using a microplate reader. B, an assay of caspase-1 and caspase-3 activity was assessed as described in Materials and Methods. The visible absorbance of each well was quantified using a microplate reader.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Neither sorafenib nor sunitinib synergizes with soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors on cell survival. A, ACHN and A498 cells were treated as described in Fig. 5 with the soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors AUBA and t-AUCB (50 μmol/L) in the presence of vehicle (DMSO), sorafenib (5 μmol/L), or sunitinib (0.5 μmol/L). B, ACHN cells were treated as in A. Epoxyeicosatrienic acids or DMSO vehicle was added to the wells at 10 μmol/L. After 48 h, the MTT assay was done as described in Materials and Methods. The visible absorbance of each well was quantified using a microplate reader.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Blood concentration-time course of sorafenib with oral administration to mice. Sorafenib (as the tosylate at 5 mg/kg) was administered to male Swiss-Webster mice as described in Materials and Methods. Each data point is the mean ± SD of three mice plotted in a log/linear scale. Blood for sorafenib analysis was collected from the tail vein of mice at different time after oral gavage. The data of t-AUCB is from ref. 30. Dotted lines A and B represent the inhibitory IC50s of sorafenib and t-AUCB against the murine soluble epoxide hydrolases, respectively.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Sorafenib contributes to its effect profile in an LPS-challenged murine model. Animals were treated as indicated with sorafenib tosylate (30 μmol/kg), sunitinib malate salt (30 μmol/kg), or t-AUCB (2.5 μmol/kg), and were sacrificed 24 h after treatment. A, plasma level of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (sum of 14,15-; 11,12-; and 8,9-epoxyeicosatrienoic acids; white columns) and dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids (sum of 14,15-; 11,12-; and 8,9-dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids; black columns). B, plasma ratio of total epoxyeicosatrienoic acids to total dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids. The 5,6-epoxyeicosatrienoic acids data are excluded because of lactone formation during sample preparation. Epoxide to diol ratios in arachidonate series (20:4) are biomarkers of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition. C, systolic blood pressure was measured 24 h after treatment by a noninvasive tail cuff method. Data are mean ± SD of four individual mice for each group. *, significantly different (P < 0.05) from normal control; $, significantly different (P < 0.05) from LPS control; †, significantly different (P < 0.05) from the mice receiving LPS and sorafenib determined by ANOVA followed with Tukey's or Games-Howell's test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Structure and inhibition potency against the murine and human soluble epoxide hydrolases

    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    InhibitorsNameInhibition of the murine sEHInhibition of the human sEH
    StructureIC50 (nmol/L)IC50 (nmol/L)KI (nmol/L)
    Sorafenib30 ± 312 ± 217 ± 4
    Sunitinib17,000 ± 1,00055,000 ± 1,000ND
    Dasatinib27,000 ± 2,0006,500 ± 500ND
    AUDA8 ± 13 ± 16.9 ± 0.2
    t-AUCB4 ± 12 ± 11.5 ± 0.2
    TPAU44 ± 312 ± 357 ± 6
    TUPS11 ± 13 ± 114 ± 4

    Abbreviations: ND, not determined; sEH, soluble epoxide hydrolase.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Data
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 8 (8)
August 2009
Volume 8, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sorafenib has soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitory activity, which contributes to its effect profile in vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sorafenib has soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitory activity, which contributes to its effect profile in vivo
Jun-Yan Liu, See-Hyoung Park, Christophe Morisseau, Sung Hee Hwang, Bruce D. Hammock and Robert H. Weiss
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2009 (8) (8) 2193-2203; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0119

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sorafenib has soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitory activity, which contributes to its effect profile in vivo
Jun-Yan Liu, See-Hyoung Park, Christophe Morisseau, Sung Hee Hwang, Bruce D. Hammock and Robert H. Weiss
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2009 (8) (8) 2193-2203; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0119
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PX-478 Radiosensitization in Pancreatic Cancer
  • Metronomic Gemcitabine Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer
  • p53-Deficient Cells Are More Sensitive to Plk1 Inhibitor
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement