Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Commentary

Predictive biomarkers for targeting insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor

Craig P. Carden, L. Rhoda Molife and Johann S. de Bono
Craig P. Carden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Rhoda Molife
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johann S. de Bono
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0641 Published August 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The development of anticancer drugs remains slow and costly. Use of predictive biomarkers has been postulated to not only accelerate this process but also increase the odds of drug approval (1). Despite concerns about the validation of the insulin-like growth factor receptor type I (IGF-IR) as an important target for anticancer drugs, many drugs targeting this receptor are currently being evaluated in clinical trials (2). IGF-IR is highly expressed on many human cancers, with its ligands IGF1 and IGF2 also being commonly overexpressed in many malignancies (3). IGF1 increases cancer-cell proliferation in vitro, and importantly knockout of IGF-IR makes nonmalignant cells highly resistant to oncogenic transformation (4). Clinical evidence for the validity of this target is also now emerging, with early evidence of antitumor activity in patients with Ewing's sarcoma, adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), and non-small cell lung (NSCLC) carcinoma (5–8).

Both small molecule inhibitors and therapeutic antibodies blocking IGF-IR are in clinical development, with the former also often targeting the insulin receptor (IR). This edition of Molecular Cancer Therapeutics includes an important report detailing a comprehensive preclinical evaluation of predictive biomarkers for h10H5 (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), a humanized monoclonal antibody to IGF-IR (9). The identification of such biomarkers remains arguably the most important issue in development of drugs targeting IGF-IR. Previous studies have reported on the expression of IGF1-R, phospho-IGF-IR, insulin receptor substrates-1 (IRS1), and -2 (IRS2), and predictive gene expression signatures (10–13). This report describes a detailed assessment of certain elements of the pathway, including an evaluation of the receptor and its ligands, and its proximal and distal signaling proteins with expression array profiles, focusing exclusively on breast and colorectal cancer (CRC) models. The authors conclude that for sensitivity to h10H5, IGF-IR overexpression is necessary but not sufficient, requiring between 1,300 to 10,000 receptors per cell for sensitivity. These data also indicate that IGF2, IRS1, and IRS2 protein expression may be important for patient selection, supporting previously published findings.

Other studies suggest that IGF-IR expression correlates with response to IGF-IR blockade (10). IGF1, IGF2, and IGF-IR were also highly expressed in sarcoma cell lines sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor BMS 536924, whereas those resistant to this drug expressed high levels of IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and -6 (IGFBP-6), and of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; ref. 11). Studies of an IGF-IR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, NVP-AEW541, reported high levels of IGF-IR in all breast cancer cell lines evaluated with a high level of IRS1-I in the most sensitive of the cells (13). Zha and colleagues report differences in predictors of sensitivity for breast cancer and CRC cell lines, with IGF-IR mRNA expression being more predictive in breast cancer than in CRC (9). Furthermore, a 60-gene predictive expression signature was identified for the CRC cell lines with no predictive signature being identified for the breast cancer cell lines. Further studies led to IRS1 and IRS2 being shown to also be important in assessing likelihood of response. The authors also described a significant correlation between IGF-IR expression and signaling, and estrogen receptor (ER) function, supporting an evaluation of these agents in this subgroup of breast cancers.

Despite the substantial number of experiments reported in this report, however, the authors may not have fully dissected the complexity of the IGF-IR pathway. IGF-IR ligands can also bind IR, although with lower affinity than IGF-IR (2). The role of IR or of the IGFBPs as mediators of drug resistance has not been evaluated here. Furthermore, the relationships between IGF-IR phosphorylation, IGF-IR overexpression, and IRS1 and IRS2 were not clear from this work. Finally, although the authors identify ER-positive breast cancer as an important area for future research, the significance of IGF-IR being previously implicated as an important target in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer is not addressed (14).

The authors suggest ways in which the predictive biomarkers identified in their preclinical experiments can be deployed in clinical trials, proposing the prospective treatment of different cohorts of ER-positive breast cancer patients positive or negative for IGF-IR staining by immunohistochemistry. One important issue with these studies in patients with metastatic cancer is that they usually use the evaluation of IGF-IR expression on archival tumor tissue, frequently acquired many years before. To resolve this problem, immunofluorescence studies of IGF-IR expression on circulating tumor cells (CTC), in addition to analysis of archival tumor tissue, could be undertaken as we have previously described (15), although further studies correlating IGF-IR expression in tumor biopsies and CTC taken from the same patient at the same time are required to clinically qualify this approach. This technique also allows an evaluation of the effect of the therapeutic agent on the number of IGF-IR-positive and IGF-IR-negative cancer cells detected by the assay. The preliminary clinical qualification of such predictive biomarkers should commence during phase I evaluation of these agents, with a focus on detailed evaluation in cohort expansions at higher drug dose levels across histological tumor types expressing the target of interest.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Drs. C.P. Carden, L.R. Molife, and J.S. de Bono have been involved in conducting trials of IGF-1R inhibitors sponsored by Pfizer Oncology and OSI Pharmaceuticals. Dr. J.S. de Bono has served as a consultant for Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Genentech, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Footnotes

    • Received July 13, 2009.
    • Accepted July 15, 2009.
  • © 2009 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Carden CP,
    2. Banerji U,
    3. Kaye SB,
    4. Workman P,
    5. de Bono JS
    . From darkness to light with biomarkers in early clinical trials of cancer drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;85:131–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gualberto A,
    2. Pollak M
    . Emerging role of insulin-like growth factor receptor inhibitors in oncology: early clinical trial results and future directions. Oncogene 2009. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
  3. ↵
    1. Furstenberger G,
    2. Senn HJ
    . Insulin-like growth factors and cancer. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:298–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sell C,
    2. Rubini M,
    3. Rubin R,
    4. Liu JP,
    5. Efstratiadis A,
    6. Baserga R
    . Simian virus 40 large tumor antigen is unable to transform mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:11217–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Olmos D,
    2. Okuno S,
    3. Schuetze SM,
    4. et al
    . Safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity of the anti-IGF-IR antibody CP-751,871 in patients with sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:553s.
    OpenUrl
    1. Olmos D,
    2. Molife R,
    3. Okuno S,
    4. et al
    . Safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the anti-IGF-IR monoclonal antibody CP-751,871 in patients with sarcomas and adrenocortical tumors. San Francisco: Presented at the AACR-NCI-EORTC Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics Meeting; 2007. Available from: http:/www.aacr.org/Uploads/DocumentRepository/2007conf/moltar/mt07postera.pdf.
    1. Carden CP,
    2. Frentzas S,
    3. Langham M,
    4. et al
    . Preliminary activity in adrenocortical tumor (ACC) in phase I dose escalation study of intermittent oral dosing of OSI-906, a small-molecule insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3544s.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Karp DD,
    2. Pas-Ares LG,
    3. Novello S,
    4. et al
    . Phase II study of the anti-insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated, locally advanced, or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2516–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Zha J,
    2. O'Brien C,
    3. Savage H,
    4. et al
    . Molecular predictors of response to a humanized anti-insulin-like growth factor-I receptor monoclonal antibody in breast and colorectal cancer. Mol Canc Ther 2009;8:2110–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Cao L,
    2. Yu Y,
    3. Darko I,
    4. et al
    . Addiction to elevated insulin-like growth factor I receptor and initial modulation of the AKT pathway define the responsiveness of rhabdomyosarcoma to the targeting antibody. Cancer Res 2008;68:8039–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Huang F,
    2. Greer A,
    3. Hurlburt W,
    4. et al
    . The mechanisms of differential sensitivity to an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor (BMS-536924) and rationale for combining with EGFR/HER2 inhibitors. Cancer Res 2009;69:161–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Byron SA,
    2. Horwitz KB,
    3. Richer JK,
    4. Lange CA,
    5. Zhang X,
    6. Yee D
    . Insulin receptor substrates mediate distinct biological responses to insulin-like growth factor receptor activation in breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2006;95:1220–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Mukohara T,
    2. Shimada H,
    3. Ogasawara N,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity of breast cancer cell lines to the novel insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitor NVP-AEW541 is dependent on the level of IRS-1 expression. Cancer Lett 2009;282:14–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Law JH,
    2. Habibi G,
    3. Hu K,
    4. et al
    . Phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor-I/insulin receptor is present in all breast cancer subtypes and is related to poor survival. Cancer Res 2008;68:10238–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. de Bono JS,
    2. Attard G,
    3. Adjei A,
    4. et al
    . Potential applications for circulating tumor cells expressing the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:3611–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 8 (8)
August 2009
Volume 8, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predictive biomarkers for targeting insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Predictive biomarkers for targeting insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor
Craig P. Carden, L. Rhoda Molife and Johann S. de Bono
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2009 (8) (8) 2077-2078; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0641

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Predictive biomarkers for targeting insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor
Craig P. Carden, L. Rhoda Molife and Johann S. de Bono
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2009 (8) (8) 2077-2078; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0641
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Commentary
  • Stem Cell Factor LIFted as a Promising Clinical Target
  • Precision Medicine: Pitfalls and Progress
Show more Commentary
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement