Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Development of flexible-heteroarotinoids for kidney cancer

Tongzu Liu, Chioniso Patience Masamha, Shylet Chengedza, K. Darrell Berlin, Stan Lightfoot, Feng He and Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook
Tongzu Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chioniso Patience Masamha
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shylet Chengedza
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Darrell Berlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stan Lightfoot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng He
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1069 Published May 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Differential induction of apoptosis in cancer over normal cells. Cultures were treated with 10 μmol/L SHetA2 for the indicated amount of time. A, cells were stained with Annexin-V and PI for flow cytometric evaluation of apoptosis. RTC91696 cells were used at passage 3 in parallel with the cytotoxicity assays in Table 1. B, the percentages of cells in the quadrant corresponding to apoptosis from four replicate experiments are presented. C and D, proteins from Caki-1 cells treated with 10 μmol/L SHetA2 for the indicated amount of time were extracted and evaluated by Western blot analysis. 24c, treated with DMSO solvent only for 24 h.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    G1 cell cycle arrest in both cancer and normal cells. Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle distribution of Caki-1 cells (A) or HK-2 normal kidney cells (B) treated with 10 μmol/L SHetA2 (C) or the same volume of solvent for 24 h before fixation and PI staining. Cyclocheximide (CHX) and a proteasome inhibitor (MG132) inhibited the SHetA2-induced G1 cell cycle arrest (C). Western blot analysis showed that Cyclin D1 protein levels are decreased in association with the cell cycle arrest (D).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Glutathione and NAC in apoptosis and G1 arrest. Flow cytometric analysis of PI-stained cells showed that reduced glutathione (GSH; 5 mmol/L) and NAC (5 mmol/L) could prevent G1 arrest in Caki-1 cancer cells (A) but not HK-2 normal cells (B) treated with 5 μmol/L SHetA2 for 24 h. C, flow cytometric analysis showed that apoptosis was not inhibited by the reduced glutathione (10 mmol/L) or NAC (10 mmol/L) in Caki-1 cells treated with 10 μmol/L SHetA2 for 20 h. Columns, mean and standard error of a representative experiment of two independent experiments done in quadruplicate; bars, SE. P values represent significant differences in the indicated columns determined by posttests using One-Way ANOVA analysis.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Induction of tubule differentiation. Top, H&E-stained sections of Caki-1 organotypic cultures grown in the absence (A and B) or presence of 1 μmol/L SHetA2 (C and D) for 2 wk before histochemical analysis. Middle, H&E-stained sections of xenograft tumors from untreated control mice (E) showing that most of the malignant cells are arranged singly and separate one from the other, compared with the more orderly arrangement of cells in tumors from mice treated with oral SHetA2 (60 mg/kg/d) 5 d per week for 30 d at the University of Oklahoma (F and G) or every day for 30 d at the RAID program (H). In some areas of the treated tumors, collections of tumor cells formed cords that were similar to tubules but no lumen was present (identified by a rectangle in F). In other areas of the treated tumors, a few tubules with lumens were present (circled in G and H). Neither cords nor lumens were present in the control tumors. I, rt-PCR analysis of E-Cadherin expression in tumors from the RAID xenografts in (bottom; H). To calculate fold induction, the expression levels in the individual treated tumors were compared with the average expression observed in three separate untreated tumors. J, real-time rtPCR analysis of E-Cadherin in Caki-1 cells treated with SHetA2 for the indicated times. Results are representative of two independent experiments. K, Western blot analysis of E-Cadherin expression in cell cultures treated with SHetA2. 24C, control cultures treated with solvent only for 24 h.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Repression of NF-κB activity. Caki-1 renal cancer cells were cotransfected with pNF-κB-Luc reporter and pRLTK transfection control plasmids and treated with DMSO or 10 μmol/L SHetA2 with or without 20 ng/mL tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) for 4 or 8 h (A) or 10 μmol/L SHetA2 only (B) for various amounts of time before lysing the cells and evaluating for luciferase activity. c, control treated with solvent only. Tumor necrosis factor α was added to last 30 min of treatment. The firefly luciferase (NF-κB reporter) was normalized to the renilla luciferase (transfection control) activity.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Effects of oral SHetA2 on Caki-1 tumor size. The mean and SE of the tumor volumes of the control group gavaged with PEG400 vehicle is shown compared with SHetA2 gavaged at 60, 40, and 20 mg/kg/d for 30 d. Arrows, the initiation and termination of treatment. *, statistically significant differences between the treated and vehicle control tumor sizes determined by t tests (day 24, P = 0.035; day 28, P = 0.021; day 32, P = 0.028; day 34, P = 0.006).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Structures and Activities of Flex-Hets and t-RA in cancer and normal renal cells

    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Caki-1 cancer786-O cancerHK-2 normalRTC91696 normal
    SHetC285.71% ± 4.53%78.53% ± 6.11%52.67% ± 1.84%52.31% ± 7.38%
    4.91 ± 0.29 μmol/L7.48 ± 0.34 μmol/L4.47 ± 0.49 μmol/L7.67 ± 0.49 μmol/L
    SHetA284.40% ± 3.86%72.00% ± 5.06%51.02% ± 7.07%36.84% ± 6.80%
    4.93 ± 0.22 μmol/L7.55 ± 0.38 μmol/L4.50 ± 0.28 μmol/L4.57 ± 0.49 μmol/L
    SHetA468.92% ± 6.94%45.04% ± 4.80%26.35% ± 0.80%39.67% ± 2.52%
    5.07 ± 0.15 μmol/L2.56 ± 0.34 μmol/L5.19 ± 0.25 μmol/L7.55 ± 0.51 μmol/L
    SHetA356.48% ± 14.58%54.10% ± 13.66%35.34% ± 2.09%28.23% ± 3.07%
    7.28 ± 0.27 μmol/L7.2 ± 0.72 μmol/L5.14 ± 0.26 μmol/L5.92 ± 1.91 μmol/L
    SHetD356.99% ± 12.12%61.52% ± 1.44%26.37% ± 0.22%46.27% ± 0.95%
    7.14 ± 0.22 μmol/L7.15 ± 0.81 μmol/L6.91 ± 0.66 μmol/L9.42 ± 0.43 μmol/L
    SHetD438.67% ± 1.50%44.55% ± 17.56%43.67% ± 0.44%37.74% ± 6.61%
    7.56 ± 0.15 μmol/L5.08 ± 0.71 μmol/L7.42 ± 0.20 μmol/L5.36 ± 0.60 μmol/L
    SHetD534.10% ± 1.20%41.80% ± 16.91%47.97% ± 1.00%ND
    7.22 ± 0.25 μmol/L5.14 ± 0.70 μmol/L4.96 ± 0.25 μmol/L
    t-RA6.46% ± 9.40%0.00% ± 1.43%15.81% ± 0.47%ND
    4.64 ± 1.14 μmol/L23.60 ± 0.0 μmol/L6.28 ± 2.19 μmol/L

    NOTE: The top value represents the efficacy (maximum growth inhibition observed) and the bottom value represents the potency (EC50, concentration needed to induce half maximal efficacy). The hydrophilicity of the compounds is increased by the end group with NO2 being the least hydrophobic, CO2Et intermediate, and CO2CH3 being the most hydrophilic.

    Abbreviations: ND, not determined; t-RA, trans-retinoic acid.

  • Table 2.

    Bacterial mutation test

    StrainTreatmentμg/plateSHetA2SHetA3
    −S9+S9−S9+S9
    MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
    TA1535DMSO (μmol/L)0213217213217
    0.125501991510273233
    0.393158269206213193
    1.245500187222197193
    3.9371581217191182165
    12.4525000165224206172
    PC: NaAZ0.530454N/AN/A30454N/AN/A
    PC: 2AA5N/AN/A32481N/AN/A32481
    TA1537DMSO (μmol/L)015421111542111
    0.0041.5896233NDNDNDND
    0.0125.0TT212131153
    0.03915.8TT214112177
    0.12550TTTT135223
    0.393158TTTT113152
    1.245500NDNDNDND112168
    3.9371581NDNDNDND6263
    PC: 9AZ10673108N/AN/A673108N/AN/A
    PC: BaP5N/AN/A1195N/AN/A1195
    TA98DMSO (μmol/L)030545133054513
    0.0041.58166482NDNDNDND
    0.0125.0TT458NDNDNDND
    0.03915.8TT5210NDNDNDND
    0.12550TT498316558
    0.393158TT126244612
    1.245500NDNDNDND276556
    3.9371581NDNDNDND223627
    12.4525000NDNDNDND187576
    PC: 2NF11087N/AN/A1087N/AN/A
    PC: BaP5N/AN/A37513N/AN/A37513
    TA100DMSO (μmol/L)0124416012124416012
    0.0041.58136171369NDNDNDND
    0.0125.0TT1241415116NDND
    0.03915.8TT1712413812NDND
    0.12550TTTT132516819
    0.393158NDNDTT1171415012
    1.245500NDNDTT123621327
    3.9371581NDNDNDNDTT2174
    PC: NaAZ0.551135N/AN/A51135N/AN/A
    PC: NQO0.5N/AN/A96570N/AN/A96570
    WP2 uvrADMSO (μmol/L)0195337195337
    0.125501732741813715
    0.393158143188193364
    1.245500181222152366
    3.9371581102173153299
    12.4525000123133153204
    PC: 2AA0.559445N/AN/A59445N/AN/A
    PC: 2AA15N/AN/A14510N/AN/A14510

    NOTE: Mean and standard deviations of the number of revertant colonies from triplicate results are presented.

    Abbreviations: PC, positive control; N/A, not applicable; T, toxic as indicated by incomplete/no background lawn.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 8 (5)
May 2009
Volume 8, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of flexible-heteroarotinoids for kidney cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Development of flexible-heteroarotinoids for kidney cancer
Tongzu Liu, Chioniso Patience Masamha, Shylet Chengedza, K. Darrell Berlin, Stan Lightfoot, Feng He and Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook
Mol Cancer Ther May 1 2009 (8) (5) 1227-1238; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1069

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Development of flexible-heteroarotinoids for kidney cancer
Tongzu Liu, Chioniso Patience Masamha, Shylet Chengedza, K. Darrell Berlin, Stan Lightfoot, Feng He and Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook
Mol Cancer Ther May 1 2009 (8) (5) 1227-1238; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1069
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PX-478 Radiosensitization in Pancreatic Cancer
  • Metronomic Gemcitabine Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer
  • p53-Deficient Cells Are More Sensitive to Plk1 Inhibitor
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement