Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles: Therapeutics, Targets, and Development

The G-rich promoter and G-rich coding sequence of basic fibroblast growth factor are the targets of thalidomide in glioma

Szu-Chieh Mei and Rong-Tsun Wu
Szu-Chieh Mei
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rong-Tsun Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2398 Published August 2008
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Thalidomide regulates bFGF expression and cellular distribution in glioma cells. bFGF mRNA expression relative to GAPDH in U-87 MG cells treated with freshly prepared thalidomide or thalidomide with a 9-h preincubation with culture medium for 3 h (A) or treated with liposome-encapsulated thalidomide for 12 or 24 h (B) was analyzed by real-time PCR. Data were collected from at least three independent experiments. Columns, relative index of untreated or empty liposome–treated control; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test. C, immunofluorescence detection of bFGF in U-87 MG cells treated with liposome-encapsulated thalidomide for 12 h. Cellular distribution of bFGF was studied by fluorescence microscopy. DNA was stained with H33258 as a nuclear marker (see also Supplementary Fig. S2). Magnification, ×400. D, protein extracts from U-87 MG cells treated liposome-encapsulated thalidomide for 12 h were subjected to Western blot analysis of bFGF expression. Left, GAPDH was used as an internal control. U-87 MG, C6, and GBM 8401 cells were treated with liposome-encapsulated thalidomide for 24 h. Protein extracts (1 μg) were used to determinate cellular bFGF levels by ELISA. Right, data were normalized with empty liposome–treated control.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effects of thalidomide on cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. A, cell proliferation ability for U-87 MG, C6, and GBM 8401 cells treated with indicated concentrations (0, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg/mL) of liposome-encapsulated thalidomide for 72 h was assayed using a resazurin assay. Points, relative index versus empty liposome–treated cells; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05, Student's t test. B, colony-forming ability of U-87 MG, C6, and GBM 8401 cells seeded in culture medium containing 10% FCS and varied concentrations of liposome-encapsulated thalidomide plus 0.3% agar (size, >0.1 mm) were counted 14 d after treatment. Data were collected from three independent experiments, with each experiment repeated six times. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test. C, aggregation ability of U-87 MG, C6, and GBM 8401 cell suspension cultured in 20 μL culture medium contained various concentrations of thalidomide (0, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL). Cells were imaged using phase-contrast microscopy and the aggregation percentage was counted by calculating 20 droplets of each experiment. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Down-regulating bFGF expression level is sufficient to decrease the anchorage-independent growth of U-87 MG cells, and exogenous bFGF can partially rescue the effect. A, cellular bFGF protein expression level in bFGF knockdown and control cells was assayed by Western blot. B, cell proliferation ability of each clone. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test. C, colony-forming ability of each knockdown clones in the presence or absence of exogenous bFGF protein. Colony-forming ability (size, >0.1 mm) was measured 14 d later. Data were collected from three independent experiments, with each experiment repeated six times. #, P < 0.01 versus control clone; **, P < 0.01 versus without exogenous bFGF condition, Student's t test. D, tumor growth of control and bFGF knockdown clones. Tumor size was determined by the following formula: 1/2 (length × width2). Data were represented as mean values from three to five mice.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Down-regulating bFGF expression level in U-87 MG cells affects the growth rate in a three-dimensional spheroid culture and exogenous bFGF restores their proliferation ability. A, spheroid morphology of bFGF knockdown clones. B, the diameter of each spheroid was measured using Image-Pro Plus software on day 4. Scale bar, 0.1 mm. C, methylene blue uptake by each of the bFGF knockdown clones as an index of spheroid cell numbers. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Thalidomide down-regulates bFGF transcription and translation by targeting its G-rich promoter and IRES region. A, EGFP mRNA expression relative to GAPDH in pbFGF-EGFP stably transfected U-87 MG cells treated with thalidomide for 3 h was analyzed by real-time PCR. Data represent at least three independent experiments. Columns, relative index of the untreated control; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test. B, schematic representation of LMW-IRES and HMW-IRES plasmids. C, IRES activity of U-87-LMW-IRES and U-87-HMW-IRES cells treated with indicated concentrations of liposome-encapsulated thalidomide for additional 12 h. Cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was assayed using a Dual Luciferase Assay kit. IRES activity was determined by calculating the Renilla luciferase (LucR) to firefly luciferase (LucF) ratio. Columns, index of the ratio of Renilla luciferase to firefly luciferase normalized to the empty liposome–treated control; bars, SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student's t test. D, UV-VIS spectrum of thalidomide incubation with non–G-rich control DNA (top) or G-rich DNA (bottom).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Suplementary Material, Mei and Wu

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Data
    • Supplementary Fig. S4
    • Supplementary Fig. S5
    • Supplementary Fig. S6
    • Supplementary Fig. S7
    • Supplementary Table S1
    • Supplementary Table S2
    • Supplementary Table S3
    • Supplementary Table S4
    • Supplementary Table S5
    • Supplementary Fig. S1
    • Supplementary Fig. S2
    • Supplementary Fig. S3
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 7 (8)
August 2008
Volume 7, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The G-rich promoter and G-rich coding sequence of basic fibroblast growth factor are the targets of thalidomide in glioma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The G-rich promoter and G-rich coding sequence of basic fibroblast growth factor are the targets of thalidomide in glioma
Szu-Chieh Mei and Rong-Tsun Wu
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2008 (7) (8) 2405-2414; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2398

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The G-rich promoter and G-rich coding sequence of basic fibroblast growth factor are the targets of thalidomide in glioma
Szu-Chieh Mei and Rong-Tsun Wu
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2008 (7) (8) 2405-2414; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2398
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of hypoxia on the expression of phosphoglycerate kinase and antitumor activity of troxacitabine and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung carcinoma
  • Dihydrofolate reductase amplification and sensitization to methotrexate of methotrexate-resistant colon cancer cells
  • MAPK-independent impairment of T-cell responses by the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib
Show more Research Articles: Therapeutics, Targets, and Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement