Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

The antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine inhibits DNA repair and sensitizes non–small cell lung carcinoma cells to DNA double-strand break–induced cell death

Anya G. Polischouk, Åsa Holgersson, Dali Zong, Bo Stenerlöw, Hanna L. Karlsson, Lennart Möller, Kristina Viktorsson and Rolf Lewensohn
Anya G. Polischouk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Åsa Holgersson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dali Zong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Stenerlöw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanna L. Karlsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lennart Möller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristina Viktorsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rolf Lewensohn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0402 Published August 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Trifluoperazine (TFP), a member of the phenothiazine class of antipsychotic drugs, has been shown to augment the cytotoxicity of the DNA-damaging agent bleomycin. In the present study, we investigated the effect of trifluoperazine on (a) survival of bleomycin-treated human non–small cell lung carcinoma U1810 cells, (b) induction and repair of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks, and (c) nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), the major DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway in mammalian cells. By using a clonogenic survival assay, we show here that concomitant administration of trifluoperazine at a subtoxic concentration enhances the cytotoxicity of bleomycin. Moreover, trifluoperazine also increases the longevity of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks in U1810 cells, as shown by both comet assay and fraction of activity released (FAR)-assay. This action seems to be related to suppression of cellular DNA DSB repair activities because NHEJ–mediated rejoining of DSBs occurs with significantly lower efficiency in the presence of trifluoperazine. We propose that TFP might be capable of inhibiting one or more elements of the DNA DSB repair machinery, thereby increasing the cytotoxicity of bleomycin in lung cancer cells. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(8):2303–9]

Keywords:
  • DNA-PK inhibition
  • phenothiazines
  • non–small cell lung cancer
  • DNA double-strand breaks
  • nonhomologous end joining

Introduction

Phenothiazines constitute a class of widely used antipsychotic drugs (1). In addition, the phenothiazine compound trifluoperazine has been shown to enhance the cytotoxicity of the radiomimetic agent bleomycin (2–5). Regimens that combine bleomycin and trifluoperazine (TFP) have also been evaluated in phase I and phase II clinical trials for the treatment of non–Hodgkin's lymphoma and glioblastoma multiforme, respectively (6, 7). Although TFP clearly can modulate the cytotoxicity of several conventional chemotherapeutic agents, the molecular mechanisms underlying its antitumor activity remain unclear. In leukemic lymphocytes, TFP was shown to enhance bleomycin-induced DNA laddering, cellular shrinkage, and chromatin condensation, all typical signs of apoptotic cell death (4).

The cytotoxicity of bleomycin derives mainly from its ability to cleave DNA, which generates DNA single-strand breaks as well as double-strand breaks (DSB; ref. 8). Studies on cellular responses to ionizing radiation have shown that DSBs are extremely toxic and production of ionizing radiation–induced DSBs correlates with impeded cell survival (9). Mammalian cells repair DNA DSBs predominantly through a process called nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), in which the two broken strands are directly rejoined end-to-end with no or minimal requirement for sequence homology (10). The core component of NHEJ is the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) complex, which is composed of two subunits, Ku and DNA-PKcs. The initial steps of NHEJ involves binding of Ku to free DNA ends (11) and is followed by recruitment of DNA-PKcs to the DNA DSB (10). This activates the serine/threonine kinase activity of DNA-PKcs and results in phosphorylation of proteins required for further steps of the NHEJ pathway (10). Deficiency in either subunits of DNA-PK causes disruption of NHEJ and hypersensitivity to DSB-inducing agents (12–16).

We have previously reported that TFP can inhibit the kinase activity of DNA-PK in vitro (17). In the present study, we analyzed the effects of TFP on the induction and repair of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks in U1810 human non–small cell lung carcinoma cells. We show here that concomitant addition of a subtoxic concentration of TFP leads to potentiation of bleomycin cytotoxicity. Moreover, TFP also increases the longevity of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks in U1810 cells. At least in part, this action involves inhibition of cellular DNA repair activities, because both overall repair of DNA strand breaks and NHEJ-mediated rejoining of DSBs occur with significantly slower kinetics in the presence of TFP. We hypothesize that trifluoperazine is capable of inhibiting one or more elements of the cellular DNA DSB repair machinery, thereby augmenting the cytotoxicity of bleomycin in lung cancer cells.

Materials and Methods

Drugs

Bleomycin (Baxter Medical AB) was dissolved in sodium chloride solution and stored at −80°C. Fresh working solutions of TFP (ICN Biomedical, Inc.) were prepared in sterilized water immediately before use. Whenever a combination of bleomycin and TFP was used, the drugs were applied concomitantly. Unless otherwise specified, the concentration of TFP used was 10 μmol/L.

Cell Culture and Treatments

The U1810 cell line is derived from an undifferentiated human non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC; ref. 18). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mmol/L l-glutamine, 100 IE/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. All cell culture supplies were purchased from Life Technologies. For all experiments, cells were seeded at the indicated density 18 to 20 h before drug treatment.

Clonogenic Survival Assay

Cultures of 100 to 600 cells per dish were exposed to graded concentrations of bleomycin for 1 h in the presence or absence of TFP. Thereafter, cells were washed and incubated in fresh growth medium for 10 days to allow colony formation. Colonies were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution and stained in Giemsa (BDH). Colonies containing at least 50 cells were scored and all data on viability are given relative to the untreated control.

Comet Assay

The alkaline variant of the comet assay was done according to Singh et al. (19) with some modifications. Briefly, cells (5 × 105) were seeded and exposed to bleomycin in the presence or absence of TFP for 1 h, trypsinized, washed, and resuspended in 100 μL PBS. Fifteen microliters of this cell suspension were added to 150 μL of 0.75% low melting point agarose at 37°C, and spread over a microscope slide precoated with 0.3% agarose. Slides were serially immersed in lysis buffer [1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L Tris, 0.1 mol/L EDTA (pH 10)] for 1 h and alkaline DNA unwinding solution (0.3 mol/L NaOH, 1 mmol/L EDTA) for 40 min, followed by electrophoresis at 25 V (≈0.86 V/cm) for 30 min in a Sub-Cell GT unit. All above steps were done at 4°C. Slides were then neutralized in 0.4 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), immersed in water, air-dried overnight at room temperature, and fixed in methanol. After staining with ethidium bromide (10 μg/mL), the comets were examined under a ×20 apochromatic objective of a fluorescence microscope and analyzed using the Komet 4.0 software (Kinetic Imaging, Ltd.). The percentage of DNA in the tail (tail %DNA) was determined for 50 comets in each sample. The background level of the tail %DNA was ∼10%.

Fraction of Activity Released Assay

Cells were cultured in 35-mm Petri dishes and labeled with 1,000 Bq/mL [14C]thymidine (Amersham Biosciences) for 48 h before a 1-h treatment with 40 μg/mL bleomycin in the absence or presence of TFP. Immediately after drug exposure, cells were washed in ice-cold PBS and either harvested at once or incubated in fresh growth medium for various lengths of time. Harvested cells were mixed with an equal volume of 1.2% low melting point agarose (FMC BioProducts), inserted immediately into precooled plug formers (Bio-Rad), and allowed to solidify for 20 min. To release DNA, plugs with embedded cells (total volume 100 μL) were submerged in 1 mL of lysis buffer [0.5 mol/L EDTA (pH 8), 2% N-laurylsarcosine, 1 mg/mL proteinase K] for ≥20 h followed by immersion in 2 mL of a high salt buffer [1.85 mol/L NaCl, 0.15 mol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 4 mmol/L Tris, 0.5% Triton X-100 (pH 7.5)] for 10 to 20 h. All steps for DNA extraction were carried out at 4°C. Kinetics of DNA end rejoining was analyzed by pulse field gel electrophoresis using a protocol optimized for separation of DNA fragments in the size range 1 to 10 Mbp (16), stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL), and photographed. The extent of DNA fragmentation was quantified by 14C scintillation counting of gel slices that were cut at the position of the 5.7 Mbp marker chromosome of Saccharomyces pombe (Cambrex Bio Science Rockland, Inc.). The fraction of activity released corresponding to DNA fragments of sizes <5.7 Mbp is presented in the text as fraction of activity released (FAR) <5.7 Mbp.

Preparation of Nuclear Extracts

Lysis of cells for in vitro DNA strand break repair assay was done essentially as described by Cheong et al. (20). Exponentially growing cells were collected and the packed cell volume (PCV) was determined. The cell pellet was suspended in four PCV equivalents of hypotonic buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, 170 μg/mL phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)], centrifuged (240 × g), and resuspended in another four packed cell volume equivalents of hypotonic buffer and incubated for 20 min. Disruption of cells was achieved by using a Dounce homogenizer (four strokes, pestle B). High salt buffer [10 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 1.4 mol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2] was added to the homogenate and centrifuged (3,300 × g, 20 min). Pellet containing cell nuclei was resuspended in 0.5 packed cell volume of low salt buffer [20 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.02 mmol/L KCl, 0.2 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, and protease inhibitors]. To this solution, 0.25 PCV of high salt buffer was slowly added and the nuclear fraction was extracted under gentle agitation for 1 h. The nuclear extract was subsequently cleared from DNA and nonsoluble nuclear membranes by ultracentrifugation (15,000 × g, 30 min) and concentrated to 25 μL in an ultrafree-0.5 centrifugal filter unit with Biomax-5 membrane (Millipore) at 11,500 × g. Finally, the sample was dialyzed against a buffer compatible for NHEJ assessment [20 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 100 mmol/L KCl, 0.2 mmol/L EDTA, 20% v/v glycerol, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, and protease inhibitors as above]. All above steps were carried out at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and adjusted to 30 to 40 μg/μL. The extract was snap frozen and stored at −80°C until use.

Preparation of DNA Substrates

The pBR322 plasmid (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) was used as DNA substrate for all in vitro DNA repair assays. To generate DNA substrate with either compatible 3′ overhangs of four nucleotides or with blunt ends, pBR322 was treated with restriction endonucleases PstI and PvuII, respectively (Fermentas). Treatment of plasmid DNA (750 ng) with bleomycin (340 ng/mL) was carried out under the conditions described by Pastwa et al. (21). Cleaved plasmid DNA was purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen GmbH).

Nonhomologous End Joining Assay

The NHEJ reaction was reconstituted in a 10 μL reaction mixture containing 10 ng plasmid DNA substrate, 80 μg nuclear protein extract, 45 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.8), 70 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.4 mmol/L EDTA, 3% v/v glycerol, 20 μg/mL bovine serum albumin, 1 mmol/L DTT, 2 mmol/L ATP, 40 mmol/L phosphocreatine, 2.5 μg creatine phosphokinase, 2 mmol/L NAD+, and 20 μmol/L each of deoxynucleotide triphosphates. When indicated, TFP (200 μmol/L) was added to the reaction mixtures. The reaction was carried out at 30°C for up to 3 h and then stopped by addition of 10 μL of a quenching solution containing 1% SDS and 0.1 mol/L EDTA. After hydrolyzing proteins with proteinase K (10 μg/50 μg protein extract) for 1 h at 37°C, the rejoined and nonrejoined plasmid DNA products were resolved by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/mL of ethidium bromide and transferred onto Hybon-XL membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For visualization, membranes with bound plasmid DNA material was hybridized to HindIII-digested [α-32P]dCTP-labeled pBR322, and developed on Fuji Medical X-ray films. Radiolabeling of pBR322 was achieved using a multiprimer DNA labeling system (Amersham Biosciences), according to manufacturers' instructions.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical tests on data derived from the comet assay and clonogenic survival assay were based on the two-sample t test, taken as significant at P < 0.05.

Results

TFP Potentiates Bleomycin Cytotoxicity in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Cells

Trifluoperazine per se at 10 μmol/L has previously been shown to be nontoxic in tumor cell lines (22). Here, we examined whether concomitant administration of 10 μmol/L TFP along with bleomycin has any effect on the cytotoxicity of the latter agent in human non–small cell lung carcinoma cells. By using a colony formation assay, we observed that exposure of U1810 cells to 10 μmol/L TFP alone has minimal effect on cell survival (Fig. 1 ; bleomycin + trifluoperazine at bleomycin = 0). As expected, exposure to bleomycin results in a dose-dependent decrease in clonogenic survival. Importantly, cells exposed to a combination of bleomycin and 10 μmol/L TFP retain significantly less clonogenic potential compared with cells treated with bleomycin alone (P < 0.05; Fig. 1). These results suggest that 10 μmol/L TFP, although nontoxic by itself, can enhance bleomycin cytotoxicity in U1810 cells.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

TFP sensitizes human non–small cell lung carcinoma cells to bleomycin-induced loss of clonogenicity. U1810 cells were exposed to graded concentrations of bleomycin for 1 h in the absence (•) or presence (○) of 10 μmol/L TFP. The cells were thereafter incubated for 10 d in drug-free growth medium to allow colony formation. Clonogenic survival was calculated from the following formula: relative survival fraction = colonies counted / (cells seeded × plating efficiency). Overall plating efficiency was 67%. Points, mean of three separate experiments with triplicate samples; bars, SEM. *, P < 0.05.

TFP Enhances the Cellular Level of Bleomycin-Induced DNA Strand Breaks

Bleomycin induces DNA strand breaks (single-strand breaks and DSBs) through a series of complex oxidative reactions (8). Using an alkaline comet assay, we compared the levels of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks in U1810 cells in the presence or absence of 10 μmol/L TFP. As illustrated in Fig. 2A , bleomycin per se produces DNA strand breaks (tail % DNA) in a dose-dependent manner. In the presence of 10 μmol/L TFP, the amount of DNA strand breaks induced by bleomycin is markedly increased (Fig. 2A). No appreciable levels of DNA strand breaks are detected in cells exposed to TFP alone (Fig. 2A; bleomycin + TFP at bleomycin = 0).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

TFP increases the longevity of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks. U1810 cells were exposed to indicated concentrations of bleomycin in the absence (•) or presence (○) of 10 μmol/L TFP for 1 h. The amount of DNA strand breaks induced by bleomycin (tail %DNA) was determined at 1 h postdrug additions using the alkaline comet assay (A). The amount of DNA strand breaks that remain after a 1-h treatment with 40 μg/mL bleomycin in the absence (•) or presence (○) of 10 μmol/L TFP was determined at indicated postincubation times (B). Points, mean of two separate experiments; bars, SEM. *, P < 0.05. The background level of tail %DNA was ∼10%.

The results presented above suggest that TFP increases the level of DNA strand breaks in bleomycin-treated cells. However, whether the effect of TFP is on DNA damage induction or repair is not readily discernible. To resolve this issue, we next examined DNA repair kinetics in U1810 cells during a 2-h recovery period after an initial exposure to 40 μg/mL bleomycin in the absence or presence of 10 μmol/L TFP. As in Fig. 2A, immediately after the 1-h treatment period, cells exposed to bleomycin plus TFP show a higher level of DNA damage than cells exposed to bleomycin only (Fig. 2B; t = 0). Upon drug removal, the levels of DNA strand breaks declines with time indicative of ongoing repair. In the absence of TFP, almost background levels of DNA strand breaks remains in bleomycin-treated cells after 1 h repair, at which time 4-fold as much DNA strand breaks can be detected in cells treated with bleomycin plus TFP. Even at 2 h, the last time point of our assay, the level of DNA strand breaks in TFP-treated cells has still not returned to background. These data suggest that trifluoperazine may interfere with the repair of bleomycin-induced DNA damage.

Trifluoperazine Inhibits Repair of Bleomycin-Induced DNA DSBs

Because accumulation of unrepaired DNA DSBs poses the biggest threat to cell survival, we further characterized the effect of TFP specifically on DNA DSB repair using a pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)–based FAR assay, which measures the level of DSBs in cells. As illustrated in Fig. 3 , the induction of DNA DSBs by bleomycin is essentially unaffected by TFP (Fig. 3; bleomycin + trifluoperazine at t = 0) and trifluoperazine per se does not give rise to DNA DSBs (Fig. 3). Bleomycin-induced DSBs are more rapidly repaired in the absence of TFP, with ∼85% being rejoined after 2 h of repair. In the presence of 10 μmol/L TFP, only about half of bleomycin-induced DSBs are rejoined during the same repair times. These data suggest that TFP may specifically inhibit repair of bleomycin-induced DSBs.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

TFP inhibits repair of bleomycin-induced DNA DSBs. [14C]thymidine-labeled U1810 cells were exposed to 40 μg/mL bleomycin in the absence (•) or presence (○) of 10 μmol/L TFP for 1 h. Kinetics of DNA DSB end rejoining was determined by PFGE–based FAR released (FAR) assay. The fraction of radioactivity corresponding to DNA of sizes <5.7 Mbp was quantified by scintillation counting and expressed as fraction of activity released <5.7 Mbp. Data from one of two independent experiments are shown.

Trifluoperazine Inhibits Nonhomologous End Joining

We have previously reported that TFP can inhibit the serine/threonine kinase activity of DNA-PK in vitro (17). Therefore, we hypothesize that TFP may enhance the cytotoxicity of bleomycin by interfering with NHEJ-mediated DNA DSB repair. Here, we used a plasmid-based in vitro DNA repair assay to study the effect of TFP on DNA DSB repair in more detail. In this assay, DNA DSBs with blunt, cohesive, or random ends were introduced into supercoiled bacterial plasmids (pBR322) using restriction enzymes or bleomycin, respectively, and the capacity for DNA end-to-end joining was studied in nuclear protein extracts. In the absence of TFP, nuclear extract of U1810 cells promotes efficient end-joining of linearized pBR322 with blunt and cohesive ends such that after 3 h of repair, 80% of PvuII-cleaved and almost all of (∼95%) PstI-cleaved linear monomers are ligated into multimers and/or circular forms of the plasmid (Fig. 4A ; −TFP). Inclusion of 200 μmol/L TFP in the reaction mixtures results in significantly lower yield of ligated products (Fig. 4A; +TFP). When bleomycin was used as the plasmid DNA-cleaving agent, successive increases of TFP concentrations up to 100 μmol/L fail to increase the amount of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks (Fig. 4B), which rules out the possibility of a direct genotoxic effect of TFP. Hence, TFP seems to impair DNA DSB repair by NHEJ without affecting DSB generation.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

TFP inhibits NHEJ-mediated DNA repair. PvuII- or PstI-cleaved plasmid DNA was incubated with U1810 nuclear extract in the absence (−TFP) or presence of 200 μmol/L TFP (+TFP) for the indicated times (A). The 0 time points represent aliquots taken immediately after the assembly of the complete reactions on ice. Di-, tri-, and multi-, denoted dimer, trimer, and multimers, respectively; are visualized by Southern blotting (top). Repair efficiency (% repair) is determined by densitometric analysis of gel pictures and is given as the fraction of ligated products (multi-, tri-, di-, and circular monomers) in relation to the total monomeric forms of the plasmid (bottom). Cleavage of plasmid DNA by bleomycin (Bleo) was assessed in the presence of increasing concentrations of TFP and expressed as the fraction (%OC) of relaxed open circles (DNA cleavage) in relation to supercoiled circles (intact DNA; B). All diagrams are representative of two separate experiments.

Discussion

The cytotoxicity of bleomycin is mainly related to its ability to generate DNA breaks, in particular DNA DSBs (8). An important factor that governs tumor cell responsiveness to bleomycin is the cellular DNA DSB repair capacity, and, in line with this, increased sensitivity to bleomycin is observed in cells deficient in NHEJ (15, 23, 24). TFP, a phenothiazine class antipsychotic drug, has been reported to enhance bleomycin-induced cytotoxicity by a poorly characterized mechanism (2, 4, 5, 22). We have previously shown that TFP can inhibit the kinase activity of the NHEJ core component DNA-PK in vitro (17). In this study, we examined whether trifluoperazine can interfere with NHEJ-mediated repair in vivo and thereby enhance bleomycin-induced cytotoxicity. In agreement with previous reports, we show here that although 10 μmol/L TFP per se is nontoxic to non–small cell lung carcinoma U1810 cells, combining TFP with bleomycin results in potentiation of the latter agent (Fig. 1). Results presented in Fig. 2B suggest that TFP may interfere with the repair of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks. However, both Fig. 2A and B also show that the initial levels of DNA strand breaks (i.e., after 1 h bleomycin treatment) are influenced by TFP. There are two likely and nonmutually exclusive explanations for this. One is that TFP may enhance the formation of bleomycin-induced DNA strand breaks. Because onset of the cellular DNA damage response is very rapid, the other possibility is that during the 1-h exposure to bleomycin, DNA repair is also taking place and the higher levels of initial damage in TFP-treated cells imply an inhibitory effect of TFP on DNA repair. Although the comet assay detects overall DNA strand breaks, it does not differentiate DNA single-strand breaks from DSBs. As accumulation of DSBs induces cell death, we investigated the effect of TFP on the fate of bleomycin-induced DNA DSBs. Importantly, slower kinetics of DNA DSB rejoining are observed in the presence of trifluoperazine when the DSB inducer was bleomycin (Fig. 3), restriction endonucleases (Fig. 4), or ionizing radiation (data not shown). Our data clearly show that comparable levels of bleomycin-induced DNA DSBs are detected regardless of TFP exposure or nonexposure, suggesting that the induction of DNA DSB by bleomycin is a TFP-independent event. Results from Fig. 4 indicate a negative effect of TFP on NHEJ in vitro because end joining of linearized plasmid DNA, a process that requires functional NHEJ, is markedly inhibited by TFP. Direct ligation of some simple DSB ends with local sequence microhomology can occur without DNA-PK (25). We observe that unlike plasmids with blunt ends (PvuII-cut), plasmids having compatible 3′-overhang (PstI-cut) are still rejoined to some extent (30% after 3 h) in the presence of TFP. Taken together, the available data suggest that TFP may possess NHEJ-suppressive activity consistent with an inhibition on DNA-PK. Whether TFP also inhibits NHEJ in vivo is an issue that needs to be clarified because the concentration of TFP found to inhibit DNA-PK (200 μmol/L) in vitro is much higher than the 10 μmol/L required to chemosensitize U1810 cells to bleomycin. Interestingly, results presented in Fig. 2 raise the possibility that TFP may also affect DNA single-strand breaks. Under the conditions used here, however, it is difficult to conclude whether TFP acts on the induction and/or the repair phase.

Phenothiazines are well-characterized calmodulin antagonists (26, 27), and this led Chafouleas et al. (2) to propose that TFP might augment bleomycin cytotoxicity by inhibiting a putative calmodulin-regulated DNA repair pathway. Recent studies have shown that inositol phosphates serve as cofactors for DNA-PKcs during NHEJ (28–30). Notably, inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP6) has been shown to regulate the mobility of Ku proteins and depletion of InsP6 by the TFP-related compound chlorpromazine causes a reduction in the mobile fraction of Ku (31). Therefore, one might speculate that the inhibitory action of TFP on DNA DSB repair shown in this study could be a consequence of calmodulin antagonism. Although the present work did not address the involvement of calmodulin, other investigators have shown that repair of DNA DSBs is in fact calmodulin dependent, at least under certain circumstances (32, 33). On the other hand, Eriksson et al. (17) have shown that TFP also suppresses the kinase activity of purified DNA-PK in vitro, suggesting that TFP may also directly influence DNA DSB repair capacity by modulating DNA-PK activity.

In summary, we show here that TFP enhances the cytotoxic effects of bleomycin in U1810 cells, which may be partially mediated by inhibition of DNA DSB repair. Given that phenothiazines such as TFP are routinely used in the clinical management of psychiatric disorders with tolerable side effects, we believe that TFP and similar compounds are suitable lead substances for development of the next generation of chemosensitizers and radiosensitizers.

Acknowledgments

We thank laboratory assistant Birgitta Mörk for excellent assistance with PFGE sample preparation and Dr. Jenny Forshed for valuable statistical help.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: Swedish Cancer Society (R. Lewensohn and B. Stenerlöw), Stockholm Cancer Society (R. Lewensohn and K. Viktorsson), and Karolinska Institutet (R. Lewensohn and K. Viktorsson).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: A.G. Polischouk and Å. Holgersson contributed equally to this work.

    • Accepted June 29, 2007.
    • Received July 11, 2006.
    • Revision received June 2, 2007.
  • American Association for Cancer Research

References

  1. ↵
    Shen WW. A history of antipsychotic drug development. Compr Psychiatry 1999;40:407–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Chafouleas JG, Bolton WE, Means AR. Potentiation of bleomycin lethality by anticalmodulin drugs: a role for calmodulin in DNA repair. Science 1984;224:1346–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. Hait WN, DeRosa WT. Calmodulin as a target for new chemotherapeutic strategies. Cancer Invest 1988;6:499–511.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Sullivan GF, Garcia-Welch A, White E, Lutzker S, Hait WN. Augmentation of apoptosis by the combination of bleomycin with trifluoperazine in the presence of mutant p53. J Exp Ther Oncol 2002;2:19–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hait WN, Lazo JS, Chen DL, Gallichio VS, Filderman AE. Antitumor and toxic effects of combination chemotherapy with bleomycin and a phenothiazine anticalmodulin agent. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:246–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Hait WN, Morris S, Lazo JS, et al. Phase I trial of combined therapy with bleomycin and the calmodulin antagonist, trifluoperazine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989;23:358–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Hait WN, Byrne TN, Piepmeier J, et al. The effect of calmodulin inhibitors with bleomycin on the treatment of patients with high grade gliomas. Cancer Res 1990;50:6636–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Chen J, Stubbe J. Bleomycins: towards better therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:102–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Iliakis G. The role of DNA double strand breaks in ionizing radiation-induced killing of eukaryotic cells. BioEssays 1991;13:641–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Hefferin ML, Tomkinson AE. Mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005;4:639–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Walker JR, Corpina RA, Goldberg J. Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair. Nature 2001;412:607–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Blunt T, Finnie NJ, Taccioli GE, et al. Defective DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is linked to V(D)J recombination and DNA repair defects associated with the murine scid mutation. Cell 1995;80:813–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. Kirchgessner CU, Patil CK, Evans JW, et al. DNA-dependent kinase (p350) as a candidate gene for the murine SCID defect. Science 1995;267:1178–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. Taccioli GE, Gottlieb TM, Blunt T, et al. Ku80: product of the XRCC5 gene and its role in DNA repair and V(D)J recombination. Science 1994;265:1442–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Allalunis-Turner MJ, Zia PK, Barron GM, Mirzayans R, Day RS III. Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in cells of a radiosensitive human malignant glioma cell line. Radiat Res 1995;144:288–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Stenerlow B, Karlsson KH, Cooper B, Rydberg B. Measurement of prompt DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells without including heat-labile sites: results for cells deficient in nonhomologous end joining. Radiat Res 2003;159:502–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Eriksson A, Yachnin J, Lewensohn R, Nilsson A. DNA-dependent protein kinase is inhibited by trifluoperazine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;283:726–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Bergh J, Nilsson K, Ekman R, Giovanella B. Establishment and characterization of cell lines from human small cell and large cell carcinomas of the lung. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand [A] 1985;93:133–47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988;175:184–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Cheong N, Perrault AR, Iliakis G. In vitro rejoining of DNA double strand breaks: a comparison of genomic-DNA with plasmid-DNA-based assays. Int J Radiat Biol 1998;73:481–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Pastwa E, Neumann RD, Winters TA. In vitro repair of complex unligatable oxidatively induced DNA double-strand breaks by human cell extracts. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:E78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Lazo JS, Hait WN, Kennedy KA, Braun ID, Meandzija B. Enhanced bleomycin-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity with calmodulin antagonists. Mol Pharmacol 1985;27:387–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    Hendrickson EA, Qin XQ, Bump EA, Schatz DG, Oettinger M, Weaver DT. A link between double-strand break-related repair and V(D)J recombination: the scid mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:4061–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Tanaka T, Yamagami T, Oka Y, Nomura T, Sugiyama H. The scid mutation in mice causes defects in the repair system for both double-strand DNA breaks and DNA cross-links. Mutat Res 1993;288:277–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Collis SJ, DeWeese TL, Jeggo PA, Parker AR. The life and death of DNA-PK. Oncogene 2005;24:949–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Hait WN, Gesmonde JF, Lazo JS. Effect of anti-calmodulin drugs on the growth and sensitivity of C6 rat glioma cells to bleomycin. Anticancer Res 1994;14:1711–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Matsushima N, Hayashi N, Jinbo Y, Izumi Y. Ca2+-bound calmodulin forms a compact globular structure on binding four trifluoperazine molecules in solution. Biochem J 2000;347 Pt 1:211–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Hanakahi LA, Bartlet-Jones M, Chappell C, Pappin D, West SC. Binding of inositol phosphate to DNA-PK and stimulation of double-strand break repair. Cell 2000;102:721–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. Hanakahi LA, West SC. Specific interaction of IP6 with human Ku70/80, the DNA-binding subunit of DNA-PK. EMBO J 2002;21:2038–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Ma Y, Lieber MR. Binding of inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) to Ku but not to DNA-PKcs. J Biol Chem 2002;277:10756–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Byrum J, Jordan S, Safrany ST, Rodgers W. Visualization of inositol phosphate-dependent mobility of Ku: depletion of the DNA-PK cofactor InsP6 inhibits Ku mobility. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:2776–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Ori Y, Herman M, Chagnac A, Malachi T, Gafter U, Korzets A. Spontaneous DNA repair in human mononuclear cells is calcium-dependent. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;336:842–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Wang Y, Mallya SM, Sikpi MO. Calmodulin antagonists and cAMP inhibit ionizing-radiation-enhancement of double-strand-break repair in human cells. Mutat Res 2000;460:29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 6 (8)
August 2007
Volume 6, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine inhibits DNA repair and sensitizes non–small cell lung carcinoma cells to DNA double-strand break–induced cell death
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine inhibits DNA repair and sensitizes non–small cell lung carcinoma cells to DNA double-strand break–induced cell death
Anya G. Polischouk, Åsa Holgersson, Dali Zong, Bo Stenerlöw, Hanna L. Karlsson, Lennart Möller, Kristina Viktorsson and Rolf Lewensohn
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2007 (6) (8) 2303-2309; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0402

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine inhibits DNA repair and sensitizes non–small cell lung carcinoma cells to DNA double-strand break–induced cell death
Anya G. Polischouk, Åsa Holgersson, Dali Zong, Bo Stenerlöw, Hanna L. Karlsson, Lennart Möller, Kristina Viktorsson and Rolf Lewensohn
Mol Cancer Ther August 1 2007 (6) (8) 2303-2309; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0402
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PX-478 Radiosensitization in Pancreatic Cancer
  • Metronomic Gemcitabine Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer
  • p53-Deficient Cells Are More Sensitive to Plk1 Inhibitor
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement