Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Article

Taxane-based reversal agents modulate drug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein, and breast cancer resistance protein

Tracy Brooks, Hans Minderman, Kieran L. O'Loughlin, Paula Pera, Iwao Ojima, Maria R. Baer and Ralph J. Bernacki
Tracy Brooks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Minderman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kieran L. O'Loughlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula Pera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iwao Ojima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria R. Baer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph J. Bernacki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published November 2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Overexpression of ATP-binding cassette transport proteins, including P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistance (MDR) protein (MRP-1), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), is a well-characterized mechanism of MDR in tumor cells. Although the cytotoxic taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel are substrates for Pgp-mediated efflux, the semisynthetic taxane analogue orataxel inhibits drug efflux mediated by Pgp as well as, as we recently demonstrated, MRP-1 and BCRP. Nevertheless, orataxel is not optimal for development as a clinical MDR modulator because of its cytotoxicity. We sought to identify noncytotoxic taxane-based broad-spectrum modulators from a library of noncytotoxic taxane-based reversal agents (tRAs) designed by eliminating the C-13 side chain of the taxane molecule, which inhibits microtubule depolymerization. Twenty tRAs, selected based on modulation of paclitaxel cytotoxicity in Pgp-overexpressing MDA435/LCC6mdr1 cells, were studied for modulation of retention and cytotoxicity of substrates of MRP-1 and BCRP as well as Pgp in established cell lines overexpressing each of these transporters. Four tRAs modulated MRP-1 and 17 modulated BCRP in addition to Pgp. The four broad-spectrum tRAs strongly modulated daunorubicin and mitoxantrone efflux and enhanced their cytotoxicity in cell lines overexpressing the three MRPs, decreasing IC50 values by as much as 97%. These tRAs, especially tRA 98006, have promise for development as clinical broad-spectrum MDR modulators and warrant more preclinical analysis to determine pharmacokinetic interactions and efficacy.

Introduction

Despite advances in the field of cancer chemotherapy, drug resistance remains a major problem. Resistance may be intrinsic or may be induced by exposure to chemotherapeutic agents (1). Moreover, resistance may be to a specific chemotherapeutic agent or to chemically diverse agents; this latter form of resistance is called multidrug resistance (MDR). MDR frequently results from overexpression of cell membrane proteins belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, which function as energy-dependent drug efflux pumps. These proteins include P-glycoprotein (Pgp), MDR protein (MRP-1), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; 2).

Pgp, a 170-kDa membrane glycoprotein with 12 transmembrane spanning domains, is encoded by the mdr1 gene. Physiologically, Pgp functions as a xenobiotic pump in the intestine, liver, kidney, and placenta as well as in the blood-brain and blood-testes barriers. It effluxes neutral and cationic compounds in addition to a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, including anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, Vinca alkaloids, and taxanes (3, 4).

MRP-1, a 190-kDa protein with 17 transmembrane spanning domains encoded by the mrp1 gene, effluxes drugs that are either conjugated to or cotransported with glutathione; the N-terminal five transmembrane spanning domains are thought to be relevant in the glutathione requirement (5). Physiologically, MRP-1 is omnipresent throughout the body, with higher levels of expression in the adrenal gland, lung, heart, blood-brain barrier, and epithelial, muscle, and endocrine tissues. MRP-1 transports organic anions and leukotriene C-4 in addition to anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, and Vinca alkaloids (5).

BCRP (BCRP/MXR/ABCG2) was initially isolated from the MCF7 AdVp3000 breast cancer cell line, which demonstrated doxorubicin efflux in the absence of Pgp or MRP expression. BCRP, encoded by the mxr gene, is a 655-amino acid, 72-kDa protein with a N-terminal ATP-binding site and six transmembrane domains. It is a “half-transporter” likely to homodimerize or heterodimerize with a yet unidentified partner. Physiologically, BCRP is found in the placenta, intestine, breast, liver, and hematopoietic stem cells. BCRP may efflux mitoxantrone and anthracyclines as well as methotrexate and topoisomerase I inhibitors (6, 7); its substrate specificity depends on the amino acid sequence of the protein. BCRP protein with an arginine-to-threonine mutation at amino acid 482 (BCRP-T482) confers resistance to anthracyclines, whereas the wild-type protein (BCRP-R482) confers resistance to mitoxantrone but not to anthracyclines (8). This varying specificity suggests a role of amino acid 482 in drug binding.

Paclitaxel, isolated from the bark of the Pacific yew tree in the 1970s, is an antitumor drug that binds to β-tubulin and inhibits its depolymerization. Significant antitumor efficacy is seen in ovarian, breast, lung, head and neck, bladder, and esophageal cancers. Docetaxel is a more potent analogue of paclitaxel and is effective in breast, ovarian, lung, gastric, and prostate cancers. Both paclitaxel and docetaxel are substrates for Pgp- and MRP-1-mediated efflux, and their efficacy is thus compromised in cells that overexpress Pgp or MRP-1 (9).

The structure of paclitaxel has been altered in a variety of ways to create analogues that are both more potent and less susceptible to Pgp-mediated efflux (10). Our laboratory has identified orataxel (formerly IDN-5109, BAY 59-8862) as a potent paclitaxel analogue that modulates efflux mediated by Pgp (11), and we have recently demonstrated that orataxel also modulates efflux mediated by MRP-1 and BCRP (12). However, as cytotoxicity is not a desirable feature of a modulator, we sought to identify a noncytotoxic taxane analogue with activity as a modulator of all three of the ABC transporters that mediate MDR.

Noncytotoxic synthetic taxane-based reversal agents (tRAs) have the taxane baccatin backbone but lack the C-13 side chain of paclitaxel that binds β-tubulin and mediates cytotoxicity (13). More than 100 noncytotoxic tRAs have been synthesized to date, with diverse side chains; some of these tRAs are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. tRA 96023 was previously found to modulate Pgp, blocking efflux of doxorubicin in Pgp-overexpressing cell lines (11). We further demonstrated that tRA 96023 also modulates drug efflux mediated by BCRP but not by MRP-1 (12). In this study, we searched our library of synthetic tRAs to identify noncytotoxic modulators of Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP that might be developed as broad-spectrum clinical MDR modulators.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

MRP-1 expression in cell lines

Note: Expression of Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP determined by flow cytometric analysis of staining with the MRK-16, MRPm6, BXP-21, and BXP-34 antibodies.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Backbone of tRAs.

Materials and Methods

Cell Lines

The breast cancer cell line MDA435/LCC6 and its Pgp-overexpressing subline MDA435/LCC6mdr1, transfected with an engineered retrovirus to constitutively overexpress the mdr1 gene (gift from Dr. R. Clarke, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC; 14), were used in the initial screening of tRAs for modulation of paclitaxel cytotoxicity. Wild-type MCF7 breast cancer (15), HL60 myeloid leukemia (16) and 8226 myeloma (17) cell lines, and resistant MCF7/R (drug selected, Pgp; 18), 8226/Dox6 (drug selected, Pgp and BCRP-R482; 17), HL60/ADR (drug selected, MRP-1; 16), MCF7/MRP1-10 (transfected, MRP-1; 19), 8226/MR20 (drug selected, BCRP-R482; 17), and MCF7 AdVp3000 (drug selected, mutant BCRP-T482; Table 1; 16) were used for subsequent study of Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP modulation.

Suspension cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies), 2 mm l-glutamine, 20 U/ml penicillin, and 20 μg/ml streptomycin (suspension cell lines; Life Technologies), and adherent cell lines in RPMI 1640 were supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 5% Nu-Serum, 10 mm HEPES, and 2 mm l-glutamine. All cell lines were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 buffered air.

Drugs and Modulators

Paclitaxel, provided by Dr. I. Ojima, was solubilized in 100% DMSO to make a stock solution of 4 mm. Mitoxantrone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was solubilized in PBS to make a stock solution of 1.933 mm, doxorubicin (Sigma-Aldrich) was solubilized in distilled water to make a stock solution of 4 mm, and daunorubicin (Sigma-Aldrich) was solubilized in PBS to make a stock solution of 10 mm. The tRAs, synthesized as previously described (13), were solubilized in 100% DMSO to make stock solutions ranging from 1 to 10 mm.

Drug Efflux

To examine the efficacy of the tRAs as broad-spectrum modulators, retention of substrate drugs was studied in cell lines overexpressing Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP. We have previously demonstrated that mitoxantrone is a substrate for all three of these proteins (17), whereas daunorubicin is known to be a substrate for Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP-T482 but not for BCRP-R482 (8). Cells were incubated at 1 × 106/ml in RPMI 1640 with 3 μm mitoxantrone or 3 μm daunorubicin for 30 min at 37°C and washed with ice-cold PBS. An aliquot of cells was placed at 4°C for the analysis of uptake. The remaining cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 with and without tRAs at a concentration of 10 μm, which is the highest concentration that can be delivered in vivo due to vehicle (Tween 80:ethanol [1:1] diluted in 0.9% NaCl Irrigation USP [Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL]) toxicity. Mitoxantrone or daunorubicin efflux was allowed to occur at 37°C for 90 min in the presence and absence of each tRA. Cells were then washed with ice-cold PBS and placed on ice until analysis. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the mean ± SE were calculated.

Flow Cytometry

Cellular mitoxantrone and daunorubicin content was analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) equipped in standard fashion with an Argon laser for 488 nm excitation and 585/42 band-pass (FL2) or 670 long-pass (FL3) filters for emission collection as previously described (17, 20).

Flow Cytometry Data Analysis

Data were analyzed with WinList software (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME). Distribution histograms of mean fluorescence intensity following efflux in the presence and absence of modulator were compared by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic (21), expressed as a D-value, which ranges from 0 (identical histograms) to 1.0 (no overlap in histograms). D-values ≥ 0.2 indicate a significant separation of histograms.

Cytotoxicity

To study cytotoxicity in suspension cell lines, cells were cultured in 24-well plates at 5 × 104 cells/well or in 48-well plates at 2.5 × 104 cells/well. Drugs were diluted in RPMI 1640 from frozen stock solutions to achieve the desired concentrations. Final DMSO concentrations were <0.1%. Cells were incubated with drugs at concentrations spanning a 5–6-log range, with and without modulators, for 96 h. Cells in each well were counted with a Coulter counter (Coulter Electronics, Fullerton, CA) as previously described (22). Experiments were performed at least in triplicate, with duplicates within each experiment.

To study cytotoxicity in the adherent cell lines, cells were seeded at 600–2000 cells/well (varying by cell line) in 96-well plates and incubated for 18–24 h at 37°C to allow for attachment. Drugs were diluted in RPMI 1640 + 2% HEPES from frozen stock solutions to arrive at the desired concentrations. Final DMSO concentrations were <0.1%. Cells were incubated with drugs at concentrations spanning a 5–6-log range, with and without modulators, for 72 h, analyzed for growth inhibition, and quantified with the sulforhodamine B dye-based assay as previously described (23). Experiments were performed at least in quintuplicate.

Cytotoxicity Data Analysis

IC50 values, or drug concentrations required to inhibit control growth by 50%, were determined using the Datalog and Gplate Microsoft FORTRAN software program developed by Dr. W. Greco at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (11). Briefly, data were fitted using the Sigmoid-Emax concentration-effect model (24) with nonlinear regression, weighed by the reciprocal of the square of the predicted response. The software uses the Marquardt (25) algorithm as adapted by Nash (26) for the nonlinear regression. Modulators were assessed for cell growth inhibition at various concentrations.

The IC50 values of mitoxantrone in the absence and presence of each tRA at 0.1, 1, and 10 μm were compared in each cell line by calculating the resistance-modifying factor (RMF) as (IC50 drug) / (IC50 drug + modulator). RMF > 1 indicates enhanced drug sensitivity in the presence of tRA, RMF = 1 indicates no effect, and RMF < 1 indicates an antagonistic effect. Statistical error was calculated for the RMFs, and enhancement of drug sensitivity was defined as (RMF − SE) > 1; the greater the RMF magnitude, the more significant the effect.

Results

Screening for Pgp Modulation

Synthetic tRAs (n = 101) were screened for Pgp modulation by treating Pgp-transfected MDA435/LCC6mdr1 breast carcinoma cells with a range of paclitaxel doses in the presence and absence of 0.1 μm tRA. When cytotoxicity was examined in the presence of higher concentrations of tRAs, a large percentage of the tRAs was efficacious at lowering the paclitaxel IC50. Thus, a tRA concentration of 0.1 μm was chosen to identify the most effective Pgp modulators. The IC50 of paclitaxel alone in the MDA435/LCC6mdr1 cells was 221 ± 6.6 nm, representing over 100-fold resistance to the agent as compared with the parental cell line MDA435/LCC6. At a concentration of 0.1 μm, 49 of 101 tRAs produced a >50% decrease in the IC50 of paclitaxel and 26 tRAs produced a >75% decrease (data not shown). Importantly, the tRAs were also screened in the parental nontransfected cell line in parallel and neither tRA cytotoxicity nor enhancement of paclitaxel cytotoxicity was noted. The 20 tRAs, which produced the greatest decreases in the IC50 of paclitaxel (Table 2), were selected for testing for MDR modulation in cell lines overexpressing MRP-1 and BCRP as well as Pgp.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

tRAs with activity against Pgp

Note: The structures are the tRAs selected for testing against other MDRs based on activity in modulating Pgp. The IC50 reduction represents the percent decrease in the IC50 of paclitaxel in the presence of 0.1 μm tRA in the MDA435/LCC6mdr1 cell line, which overexpresses Pgp.

Modulation of Drug Efflux in Cells Lines Overexpressing Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP

The 20 tRAs selected based on modulation of paclitaxel cytotoxicity in MDA435/LCC6mdr1 cells were tested for modulation of mitoxantrone efflux in resistant cell lines overexpressing Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP. The tRAs were initially tested at 10 μm, the maximum concentration that could be delivered in vivo due to vehicle toxicity (see “Materials and Methods”). The tRAs did not have inherent fluorescence and did not modulate mitoxantrone in the non-MDR-overexpressing HL60/wt cell line (data not shown). Following uptake of mitoxantrone, 8226/Dox6, HL60/ADR, and 8226/MR20 cells, which overexpress Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP-R482, respectively, effluxed 40–50% of their intracellular mitoxantrone content during 90 min incubation in medium alone. With the exception of tRA 01069, all of the tRAs studied modulated efflux of mitoxantrone in Pgp-overexpressing 8226/Dox6 cells, with D-values of at least 0.2 for the comparison of efflux in the presence and absence of tRA, consistent with the initial criterion for the selection of these tRAs. Four tRAs modulated mitoxantrone efflux in HL60/ADR cells and 17 modulated mitoxantrone efflux in 8226/MR20 cells; the tRAs that modulated efflux in 8226/MR20 cells included those that modulated efflux in HL60/ADR cells (Fig. 2A). Thus, four tRAs were identified as having broad-spectrum activity, modulating mitoxantrone efflux in resistant cell lines overexpressing each of the three MDR-associated drug efflux pumps (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Effect of tRAs on drug efflux in resistant cell lines. Results are expressed as D-values comparing efflux of mitoxantrone (A) and daunorubicin (B) in the presence and absence of tRAs. Screening of tRAs for modulation of mitoxantrone efflux mediated by MRP-1 (HL60/ADR) and BCRP (8226/MR20) is demonstrated; Pgp (8226/Dox6) is also shown (A). Modulation of daunorubicin efflux mediated by MRP-1 (HL60/ADR) as well as Pgp (8226/Dox6) is also shown (B). Arrows, the four tRAs that are broad-spectrum modulators: 98006, 98007, 99018, and 99020.

The tRAs were also tested for modulation of daunorubicin efflux in 8226/Dox6 and HL60/ADR cells. Because daunorubicin is not a substrate for BCRP-R482, modulation of daunorubicin efflux was not studied in 8226/MR20 cells but was examined in MCF7 AdVp3000 cells, which overexpress BCRP-T482 (see below). The results were concordant with those for mitoxantrone; all 20 agents modulated daunorubicin efflux in 8226/Dox6 cells, and the four tRAs that modulated mitoxantrone efflux in HL60/ADR cells also modulated daunorubicin efflux (Fig. 2B).

tRAs 98006, 98007, 99018, and 99020, the four tRAs that were identified as modulators of efflux mediated by Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP-R482, were further studied for concentration-dependent effects on mitoxantrone efflux. Each of the tRAs modulated Pgp-mediated efflux in a concentration-dependent manner, starting at concentrations as low as 0.1–0.3 μm (Fig. 3A), with D-values of 0.23–0.68. Each of the tRAs modulated efflux mediated by MRP-1 at a concentration of 10 μm, with D-values ranging from 0.23 to 0.28, but not at lower concentrations (Fig. 3B). The tRAs also modulated efflux mediated by BCRP-R482 (Fig. 3C) in a concentration-dependent manner: tRA 98006 modulated efflux at 0.3 μm and higher, with D-values of 0.35–0.46; tRA 98007 modulated efflux at concentrations of 0.1 μm and higher, with D-values of 0.29–0.52; tRA 99018 modulated efflux only at 10 μm, with a D-value of 0.26; and tRA 99020 modulated efflux at concentrations of 1 μm and higher, with D-values of 0.24–0.49.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Dose-effect of broad-spectrum tRAs on mitoxantrone efflux in MDR-expressing suspension cell lines. Mitoxantrone efflux was studied by flow cytometry in the presence and absence of tRAs 98006, 98007, 99018, and 99020 at varying concentrations. Efflux in the presence and absence of each tRA was compared by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, expressed as a D-value. The tRAs modulated efflux in 8226/Dox6 cells at concentrations as low as 100 nm (A), in HL60/ADR cells only at 10 μm (B), and in 8226/MR20 cells at concentrations as low as 0.1 μm (C).

To test the ability of the broad-spectrum tRAs to modulate efflux mediated by BCRP-T482, we studied drug uptake and efflux in MCF7 AdVp3000 breast cancer cells. Concentration-dependent tRA modulation of both mitoxantrone and daunorubicin efflux was studied under the same experimental conditions as described above, with tRA concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10 μm. At concentrations up to 10 μm, the tRAs were ineffective modulators of efflux of mitoxantrone (data not shown) and daunorubicin (Fig. 4) mediated by BCRP-T482 in MCF7 AdVp3000 cells.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Effect of tRAs on daunorubicin efflux in MCF7 AdVp3000 cells. Daunorubicin efflux was studied by flow cytometry in the presence and absence of tRAs 98006, 98007, 99018, and 99020 at 10 μm. Intracellular daunorubicin content was measured as log-scale fluorescence intensity (FL2). Efflux in the presence and absence of each tRA was compared by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, expressed as a D-value. None of the tRAs modulated efflux mediated by BCRP-T482.

Enhancement of Cytotoxicity

Each of the four tRAs was studied for effects on mitoxantrone cytotoxicity at a range of concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μm). Controls of tRA alone within each experiment confirmed that each tRA was noncytotoxic at all concentrations tested for modulation. Cytotoxicity experiments were also performed separately for each tRA, and toxicity was negligible at doses up to 30 μm, as shown for tRA 98006 in Fig. 5. Moreover, toxicity at high concentrations is attributable to the solvent DMSO. All four tRAs produced a concentration-dependent decrease of the IC50 of mitoxantrone in 8226/Dox6 cells, seen as a cytotoxicity curve shift to the left in Fig. 6A, with RMFs of 1–13 (Table 3). Modulation of MRP-1-mediated resistance to mitoxantrone in HL60/ADR cells was observed with tRAs 98006, 98007, and 99020 but not with tRA 99018 (Fig. 6B); the degree of modulation was less than that observed for Pgp, with a maximum RMF of 2.2 (Table 3). Finally, all four tRAs modulated mitoxantrone resistance in 8226/MR20 cells with overexpression of BCRP-R482 (Fig. 6C), and the degree of modulation was greater than that observed for Pgp and MRP-1, with RMFs of 1–62 (Table 3).

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Toxicity of tRA 98006 and DMSO on myeloma/leukemia cell lines. Results are percent of control growth versus log-scale drug concentration. HL60/wt (A), HL60/ADR (A), 8226/wt (B), 8226/Dox6 (B), and 8226/MR20 (B) cells were treated with tRA 98006 (open symbols) or comparable concentrations of DMSO (closed symbols) for 96 h. Horizontal line, 50% control cell growth; experimental values are representative of at least triplicate experiments.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

Effect of tRAs on mitoxantrone cytotoxicity in resistant cell lines. Results are percent of control growth versus log-scale drug concentration. 8226/Dox6 (A), HL60/ADR (B), and 8226/MR20 (C) cells were treated with mitoxantrone for 96 h in the absence (•) and presence of tRAs at 0.1 μm (∇), 1 μm (▪), and 10 μm (◊). Horizontal line, 50% control cell growth; experimental values are representative of at least triplicate experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

RMFs of broad-spectrum tRAs on mitoxantrone cytotoxicity in resistant cell lines

Note: 8226/Dox6, HL60/ADR, and 8226/MR20 cells were treated with mitoxantrone for 96 h in the absence and presence of tRAs 98006, 98007, 99018, or 99020 at 0.1, 1, and 10 μm. Results are expressed as RMFs calculated as (IC50 mitoxantrone) / (IC50 mitoxantrone + tRA). Experimental values are representative of at least triplicate experiments over which the SE was calculated.

tRA 98006 was identified as the lead broad-spectrum modulator based on its degree of modulation of MRP-1 and BCRP-R482 in addition to Pgp. This agent was further studied by measuring its effects on anthracycline cytotoxicity in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line model. Wild-type MCF7 cells, MCF7/R cells (which overexpress Pgp), MCF7/MRP1-10 cells (which overexpress MRP-1), and MCF7 AdVp3000 cells (which overexpress BCRP-T482) were treated with doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and mitoxantrone with and without tRA 98006 at 0.1, 1, and 10 μm (Fig. 7 and Table 4). A minimal degree of modulation was seen in wild-type MCF7 cells (Fig. 7A), likely due to their low-level BCRP expression (8). tRA 98006 modulated resistance to all three drugs in MCF7/R cells at concentrations as low as 0.1 μm (Fig. 7B); RMFs ranged between 2.5 and 20 (Table 4). tRA 98006 also markedly enhanced cytotoxicity of all three drugs in MCF7/MRP1-10 cells at concentrations of 1 and 10 μm (Fig. 7C); RMFs ranged from 1 to 24 (Table 4). tRA 98006 did not modulate mitoxantrone cytotoxicity in MCF7 AdVp3000 cells and only modulated doxorubicin and daunorubicin cytotoxicity at a concentration of 10 μm (Fig. 7D), with correlating RMFs up to 3 (Table 4).

Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7

Effect of tRA 98006 on cytotoxicity in MCF7 cells. Results are percent of control growth versus log-scale drug concentration. MCF7/S (A), MCF7/R (B), MCF7/MRP1-10 (C), and MCF7 AdVp3000 (D) cells were treated with doxorubicin, daunorubicin, or mitoxantrone for 72 h in the absence (•) or presence of tRA 98006 at 0.1 μm (∇), 1 μm (▪), and 10 μm (◊). Horizontal line, 50% control cell growth; experimental values are representative of at least triplicate experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Effect of tRA 98006 on anthracycline cytotoxicity in MCF7 cells

Note: MCF7/S, MCF7/R, MCF7/MRP1-10, and MCF7 AdVp3000 cells were treated with doxorubicin, daunorubicin, or mitoxantrone for 72 h in the absence and presence of tRA 98006 at 0.1, 1, and 10 μm. Results are expressed as RMFs. Experimental values are representative of at least triplicate experiments over which the SE was calculated.

Discussion

In this study, we identified four noncytotoxic synthetic tRAs that modulate efflux and cytotoxicity of substrate drugs in multidrug resistant cell lines overexpressing Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP-R482. The most effective of the four modulators was tRA 98006.

The amino acid at position 482 of the BCRP protein is known to determine substrate specificity (8); based on the evidence presented here, the amino acid at position 482 of the BCRP protein also determined modulator efficacy. The tRAs modulated drug efflux and resistance mediated by BCRP-R482 but not by BCRP-T482. Although BCRP-T482 is found in MCF7 AdVp3000 cells, in which BCRP-mediated resistance was initially described (6), it has not been demonstrated in clinical samples. BCRP-R482 has been found to be present in all cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML; 27) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (28) studied to date; BCRP mutations have not been found. Thus, based on data to date, the tRAs should be effective broad-spectrum modulators in the acute leukemias, modulating Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP-R482.

The relevance of the three MDRs has been thoroughly studied in AML due to the ease of obtaining tumor cells for study and the ability to correlate MDR expression with treatment response, which is heterogeneous. Pgp, MRP-1, and BCRP are all known to be expressed in AML cells. Pgp has been shown to have clinical relevance in AML (29–32), and the relevance of MRP expression has also been demonstrated (31–33). Moreover, the relevance of BCRP has been suggested in studies performed to date (34–37). Coexpression of multiple MDRs in AML cells (37, 38) provides a strong rationale for studying broad-spectrum modulators in the treatment of this disease.

Most MDR modulation clinical trials to date have focused on inhibiting Pgp using modulators such as cyclosporin A (CsA) and PSC-833. The results thus far have been disappointing for the most part (39–41). Lack of efficacy in most clinical trials may be due in part to coexpression of multiple MRPs in many cases. The only positive clinical trials in AML have been with CsA (42, 43), an immunomodulator that has been shown to modulate MRP-1 in addition to Pgp and may partially modulate BCRP (44). The CsA trial demonstrated a significant reduction in the frequency of resistance to induction therapy in the population of patients who received modulator (P = 0.0077) as well as an increase in relapse-free (at 2 years) and overall survival (P = 0.031 and 0.046, respectively; 43). The efficacy of CsA may be due in part to its activity against multiple MRPs, suggesting that identification of clinically applicable broad-spectrum MDR modulators may be a promising avenue of investigation.

Broad-spectrum modulators have potential advantages and disadvantages. As noted, the ability to block more than one efflux pump would be useful in the treatment of malignancies, such as AML, in which multiple pumps are expressed. Agents capable of blocking the largest number of clinically relevant MDR pumps may have the greatest potential for success in patients. Moreover, regimens using a broad-spectrum modulator from the onset of treatment could mitigate induction of expression of multiple MDR pumps (6, 45). An additional advantage may be increased absorption following oral administration, as multiple MDRs are expressed in the mucosal cells of the gastrointestinal tract (46), or increased penetration of drugs into pharmacological sanctuaries such as the brain (47, 48).

Potential concerns about the use of broad-spectrum modulators include possible increased toxicity, as efflux from such “protected” areas (i.e., brain and testes) would also be blocked. Moreover, detoxifying organs, including the liver and the kidney, also express MDRs (49), and modulation of these proteins might also alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of chemotherapeutic agents.

The potential for PK interaction is a large concern and is one of the biggest obstacles in MDR modulation. As mentioned, MDRs are expressed in many tissues normally and these proteins may be modulated. Thus, increased amounts of drug will enter peripheral organs, and the function of the main detoxifying organs (liver and kidneys) will be altered. In clinical trials carried out thus far, doses of chemotherapeutic agents have had to be decreased by up to 60% in the modulation arm, as increases in the drug's area under curve and half-life, accompanied by decreased drug clearance, have been noted with CsA and PSC-833 (45). New third-generation modulators, including both specific and broad-spectrum agents, have been found to have minimal to no PK interactions when combined with doxorubicin or paclitaxel (50–52); PK interactions remain an important aspect of the tRAs to be studied.

Additionally, as chemotherapeutic agents are not the only substrates for MDR pumps, patients receiving modulation therapy must be diligently surveyed for other drugs that they may be taking to treat comorbid conditions. Antiarrythmic agents, antihypertensive agents, hormones, and antihistamines (46) are also Pgp substrates and are contraindicated in the setting of modulation therapy. These potential problems need to be explored for each agent as part of preclinical and subsequent clinical testing.

The most effective broad-spectrum modulator identified in this study was tRA 98006. Preclinical testing will continue with this agent, with the eventual goal of clinical testing in AML and other malignancies.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Grant support: 1 R01 CA 73872-03 (R.J.B.) and 1 R21 CA 89938-01 (M.R.B.) from the National Cancer Institute, 1 R01 GM-42798 (I.O.) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Translational Research grant (M.R.B.), T32 CA09072-28 from the NIH Department of Pharmacology, shared resources of the Roswell Park Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA16056), the Leonard S. Lovullo Memorial Fund for Leukemia Research, and the Dennis J. Szefel, Jr. Endowed Fund for Leukemia Research at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.

    • Accepted August 28, 2003.
    • Received June 17, 2003.
    • Revision received August 15, 2003.
  • American Association for Cancer Research

References

  1. ↵
    Blagosklonny, M. V. Drug-resistance enables selective killing of resistant leukemia cells: exploiting of drug resistance instead of reversal. Leukemia, 13: 2031–2035, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Gottesman, M. M., Fojo, T., and Bates, S. E. Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2: 48–58, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Juliano, R. L. and Ling, V. A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 455: 152–162, 1976.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Ueda, K., Cornwell, M. M., Gottesman, M. M., Pastan, I., Roninson, I. B., Ling, V., and Riordan, J. R. The mdr1 gene, responsible for multidrug-resistance, codes for P-glycoprotein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 141: 956–962, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Borst, P., Evers, R., Kool, M., and Wijnholds, J. A family of drug transporters: the multidrug resistance-associated proteins. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92: 1295–1302, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Doyle, L. A., Yang, W., Abruzzo, L. V., Krogmann, T., Gao, Y., Rishi, A. K., and Ross, D. D. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95: 15665–15670, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Scheffer, G. L., Maliepaard, M., Pijnenborg, A. C., van Gastelen, M. A., de Jong, M. C., Schroeijers, A. B., van der Kolk, D. M., Allen, J. D., Ross, D. D., van der Valk, P., Dalton, W. S., Schellens, J. H., and Scheper, R. J. Breast cancer resistance protein is localized at the plasma membrane in mitoxantrone- and topotecan-resistant cell lines. Cancer Res., 60: 2589–2593, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Honjo, Y., Hrycyna, C. A., Yan, Q. W., Medina-Perez, W. Y., Robey, R. W., van de Laar, A., Litman, T., Dean, M., and Bates, S. E. Acquired mutations in the MXR/BCRP/ABCP gene alter substrate specificity in MXR/BCRP/ABCP-overexpressing cells. Cancer Res., 61: 6635–6639, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Goodman Gilman, A. Goodman & Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 9th ed. In: J. G. Hardman, L. E. Limbird, P. B. Molinoff, R. W. Ruddon, and A. G. Gilman (eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Health Professions Division, 1996.
  10. ↵
    Ojima, I., Lin, S., Slater, J. C., Wang, T., Pera, P., Bernacki, R. J., Ferlini, C., and Scambia, G. Syntheses and biological activity of C-3′-difluoromethyl-taxoids. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett., 8: 1619–1628, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    Vredenburg, M. R., Ojima, I., Veith, J., Pera, P., Kee, K., Cabral, F., Sharma, A., Kanter, P., Greco, W. R., and Bernacki, R. J. Effects of orally active taxanes on P-glycoprotein modulation and colon and breast carcinoma drug resistance. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 93: 1234–1245, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Minderman, H., Brooks, T., O'Loughlin, K. L., Ojima, I., Bernacki, R. J., and Baer, M. R. Multidrug resistance (MDR) modulation by the taxane derivatives IDN-5109 and tRA 96023: effects on P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-, multidrug resistance protein (MRP-1)-, and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)-mediated drug transport. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 43: 950, 2002.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Ojima, I., Bounaud, P. Y., Takeuchi, C., Pera, P., and Bernacki, R. J. New taxanes as highly efficient reversal agents for multidrug resistance in cancer cells. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett., 8: 189–194, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Leonessa, F., Green, D., Licht, T., Wright, A., Wingate-Legette, K., Lippman, J., Gottesman, M. M., and Clarke, R. MDA435/LCC6 and MDA435/LCC6MDR1: ascites models of human breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 73: 154–161, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Soule, H. D., Vazguez, J., Long, A., Albert, S., and Brennan, M. A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 51: 1409–1416, 1973.
  16. ↵
    Gollapudi, S. and Gupta, S. Lack of reversal of daunorubicin resistance in HL60/AR cells by cyclosporin A. Anticancer Res., 12: 2127–2132, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Minderman, H., Suvannasankha, A., O'Loughlin, K. L., Scheffer, G. L., Scheper, R. J., Robey, R. W., and Baer, M. R. Flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer resistance protein expression and function. Cytometry, 48: 59–65, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Fairchild, C. R., Ivy, S. P., Kao-Shan, C. S., Whang-Peng, J., Rosen, N., Israel, M. A., Melera, P. W., Cowan, K. H., and Goldsmith, M. E. Isolation of amplified and overexpressed DNA sequences from Adriamycin-resistant human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 47: 5141–5148, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Paumi, C. M., Wright, M., Townsend, A. J., and Morrow, C. S. Multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 1 and MRP3 attenuate cytotoxic and transactivating effects of the cyclopentenone prostaglandin, 15-deoxy-Δ(12,14)prostaglandin J(2) in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Biochemistry, 42: 5429–5437, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Speth, P. A., Linssen, P. C., Boezeman, J. B., Wessels, H. M., and Haanen, C. Quantitation of anthracyclines in human hematopoietic cell subpopulations by flow cytometry correlated with high pressure liquid chromatography. Cytometry, 6: 143–150, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Young, I. T. Proof without prejudice: use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the analysis of histograms from flow systems and other sources. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 7: 935–941, 1977.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Attallah, A. M. and Johnson, R. P. A simple highly sensitive methods for the determination of cell viability using an electronic particle analyzer, Coulter counter. J. Immunol. Methods, 41: 155–162, 1981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Skehan, P., Storeng, R., Scudiero, D., Monks, A., McMahon, J., Vistica, D., Warren, J. T., Bokesch, H., Kenney, S., and Boyd, M. R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 82: 1107–1112, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Holford, N. H. and Sheiner, L. B. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 6: 429–453, 1981.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Marquardt, D. W. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math, 11: 431–441, 1963.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Nash, J. C. Compact Numerical Method for Computers: Linear Algebra and Function Minimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
  27. ↵
    Suvannasankha, A., Minderman, H., O'Loughlin, K. L., Nakanishi, T., Greco, W. R., Ross, D. D., and Baer, M. R. Breast cancer resistance protein: discordance between expression and function in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 100: 67a, 2002.
  28. ↵
    Plasschaert, S. L. A., de Bont, E. S. J. M., Kamps W. A., van der Kolk, D. M., Morisaki K., Scheffer, G. L., Scheper, R. J., Vellenga, E., and de Vries, E. G. E. Functional activity of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia, 17: 662, 2003.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Broxterman, H. J., Sonneveld, P., van Putten, W. J., Lankelma, J., Eekman, C. A., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Pinedo, H. M., Lowenberg, B., and Schuurhuis, G. J. P-glycoprotein in primary acute myeloid leukemia and treatment outcome of idarubicin/cytosine arabinoside-based induction therapy. Leukemia, 14: 1018–1024, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Campos, L., Guyotat, D., Archimbaud, E., Calmard-Oriol, P., Tsuruo, T., Troncy, J., Treille, D., and Fiere, D. Clinical significance of multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein expression on acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia cells at diagnosis. Blood, 79: 473–476, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Legrand, O., Simonin, G., Perrot, J. Y., Zittoun, R., and Marie, J. P. Pgp and MRP activities using calcein-AM are prognostic factors in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood, 91: 4480–4488, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    van der Kolk, D. M., de Vries, E. G., van Putten, W. J., Verdonck, L. F., Ossenkoppele, G. J., Verhoef, G. E., and Vellenga, E. P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance protein activities in relation to treatment outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 3205–3214, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Leith, C. P., Kopecky, K. J., Chen, I. M., Eijdems, L., Slovak, M. L., McConnell, T. S., Head, D. R., Weick, J., Grever, M. R., Appelbaum, F. R., and Willman, C. L. Frequency and clinical significance of the expression of the multidrug resistance proteins MDR1/P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and LRP in acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Blood, 94: 1086–1099, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Ross, D. D., Karp, J. E., Chen, T. T., and Doyle, L. A. Expression of breast cancer resistance protein in blast cells from patients with acute leukemia. Blood, 96: 365–368, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Steinbach, D., Sell, W., Voigt, A., Hermann, J., Zintl, F., and Sauerbrey, A. BCRP gene expression is associated with a poor response to remission induction therapy in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia, 16: 1443–1447, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    van der Kolk, D. M., Vellenga, E., Scheffer, G. L., Muller, M., Bates, S. E., Scheper, R. J., and de Vries, E. G. Expression and activity of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in de novo and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 99: 3763–3770, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M., Wiemer, E. A., Prins, A., Meijerink, J. P., Vossebeld, P. J., van der Holt, B., Pieters, R., and Sonneveld, P. Increased expression of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemia, 16: 833–839, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Legrand, O., Simonin, G., Beauchamp-Nicoud, A., Zittoun, R., and Marie, J. P. Simultaneous activity of MRP1 and Pgp is correlated with in vitro resistance to daunorubicin and with in vivo resistance in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 94: 1046–1056, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Sonneveld, P., Burnett, A., Vossebeld, P., Ben-Am, M., Rosenkranz, G., Pfister, C., Verhoef, G., Dekker, A., Ossenkoppele, G., Ferrant, C., Yin, L., Gratwohl, A., Kovacsovics, T., Vellenga, E., Capdeville, R., and Lowenberg, B. Dose-finding study of valspodar (PSC 833) with daunorubicin and cytarabine to reverse multidrug resistance in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Hematol. J., 1: 411–421, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Baer, M. R., George, S. L., Dodge, R. K., O'Loughlin, K. L., Minderman, H., Caligiuri, M. A., Anastasi, J., Powell, B. L., Kolitz, J. E., Schiffer, C. A., Bloomfield, C. D., and Larson, R. A. Phase 3 study of the multidrug resistance modulator PSC-833 in previously untreated patients 60 years of age and older with acute myeloid leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9720. Blood, 100: 1224–1232, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Advani, R., Saba, H. I., Tallman, M. S., Rowe, J. M., Wiernik, P. H., Ramek, J., Dugan, K., Lum, B., Villena, J., Davis, E., Paietta, E., Litchman, M., Sikic, B. I., and Greenberg, P. L. Treatment of refractory and relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia with combination chemotherapy plus the multidrug resistance modulator PSC 833 (Valspodar). Blood, 93: 787–795, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Smeets, M., Raymakers, R., Muus, P., Vierwinden, G., Linssen, P., Masereeuw, R., and de Witte, T. Cyclosporin increases cellular idarubicin and idarubicinol concentrations in relapsed or refractory AML mainly due to reduced systemic clearance. Leukemia, 15: 80, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    List, A. F., Kopecky, K. J., Willman, C. L., Head, D. R., Persons, D. L., Slovak, M. L., Dorr, R., Karanes, C., Hynes, H. E., Doroshow, J. H., Shurafa, M., and Appelbaum, F. R. Benefit of cyclosporine modulation of drug resistance in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood, 98: 3212–3220, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Minderman, H., Suvannasankha, A., O'Loughlin, K. L., Allen, J. D., Schinkel, A. H., Scheper, R. J., Scheffer, G. L., Robey, R., Bates, S. E., and Baer, M. R. P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance-associated protein and breast cancer resistance protein-mediated transport: substrate and modulator specificity. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 43: 496–497, 2002.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    Tan, B., Piwnica-Worms, D., and Ratner, L. Multidrug resistance transporters and modulation. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 12: 450–458, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Litman, T., Druley, T. E., Stein, W. D., and Bates, S. E. From MDR to MXR: new understanding of multidrug resistance systems, their properties and clinical significance. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 58: 931–959, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Cooray, H. C., Blackmore, C. G., Maskell, L., and Barrand, M. A. Localization of breast cancer resistance protein in microvessel endothelium of human brain. NeuroReport, 13: 2059–2063, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Decleves, X., Fajac, A., Lehmann-Che, J., Tardy, M., Mercier, C., Hurbain, I., Laplanche, J. L., Bernaudin, J. F., and Scherrmann, J. M. Molecular and functional MDR1-Pgp and MRPs expression in human glioblastoma multiforme cell lines. Int. J. Cancer, 98: 173–180, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Dean, M., Rzhetsky, A., and Allikmets, R. The human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. Genome Res., 11: 1156–1166, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Sparreboom, A., Planting, A. S. , Jewell, R. C., van der Burg, M. E., van der Gaast, A., de Bruijn, P., Loos, W. J., Nooter, K., Chandler, L. H., Paul, E. M., Wissel, P. S., and Verweij, J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in combination with GF120918, a potent inhibitor of MDR1 P-glycoprotein. Anticancer Drugs, 10: 719–728, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    Fracasso, P., Tan, B., Arquette, M., Bartlett, N., Ramaswamy, G., Temple, S., Revell, S., Ellis, B., Jordan, C., Goldstein, L., and Slapak, C. A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and LY335979 in patients with advanced malignancies. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Annu. Meet., 19: 181a, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    Rowinsky, E. K., Smith, L., Wang, Y. M., Chaturvedi, P., Villalona, M., Campbell, E., Aylesworth, C., Eckhardt, S. G., Hammond, L., Kraynak, M., Drengler, R., Stephenson, J., Jr., Harding, M. W., and Von Hoff, D. D. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel in combination with biricodar, a novel agent that reverses multidrug resistance conferred by overexpression of both MDR1 and MRP. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 2964–2976, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 2 (11)
November 2003
Volume 2, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Taxane-based reversal agents modulate drug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein, and breast cancer resistance protein
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Taxane-based reversal agents modulate drug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein, and breast cancer resistance protein
Tracy Brooks, Hans Minderman, Kieran L. O'Loughlin, Paula Pera, Iwao Ojima, Maria R. Baer and Ralph J. Bernacki
Mol Cancer Ther November 1 2003 (2) (11) 1195-1205;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Taxane-based reversal agents modulate drug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein, and breast cancer resistance protein
Tracy Brooks, Hans Minderman, Kieran L. O'Loughlin, Paula Pera, Iwao Ojima, Maria R. Baer and Ralph J. Bernacki
Mol Cancer Ther November 1 2003 (2) (11) 1195-1205;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prediction of individual response to platinum/paclitaxel combination using novel marker genes in ovarian cancers
  • Low doses of cisplatin or gemcitabine plus Photofrin/photodynamic therapy: Disjointed cell cycle phase-related activity accounts for synergistic outcome in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer cells (H1299)
  • Semisynthetic homoharringtonine induces apoptosis via inhibition of protein synthesis and triggers rapid myeloid cell leukemia-1 down-regulation in myeloid leukemia cells
Show more Article
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement