Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Article

Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1

Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Satomi Tsukahara, Yasuo Imai, Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Kazumitsu Ueda and Takashi Tsuruo
Yoshikazu Sugimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satomi Tsukahara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuo Imai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshikazu Sugimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazumitsu Ueda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Tsuruo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published January 2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), an ATP-binding cassette transporter, confers resistance to a series of anticancer agents such as SN-38, mitoxantrone, and topotecan. In a previous study, we found that estrogens reverse drug resistance of BCRP-expressing cells. In this study, estrogen antagonists, estrogen agonists, and their derivatives were evaluated for BCRP-reversing activity. First, compounds were tested for effects on the cellular accumulation of topotecan in BCRP-transduced K562 cells (K562/BCRP). Next, these compounds were examined for their ability to reverse SN-38 and mitoxantrone resistance in K562/BCRP cells. Among commercially available estrogen antagonists and agonists tested, diethylstilbestrol showed the strongest BCRP-reversing activity. Diethylstilbestrol increased the cellular accumulation of topotecan and reversed drug resistance in K562/BCRP cells but showed marginal or no effect in parental K562 cells. The reversal activities of estrone and diethylstilbestrol were more prominent for mitoxantrone than for SN-38. Tamoxifen and toremifene were also found to enhance topotecan uptake in K562/BCRP cells. Next, various tamoxifen derivatives were screened for anti-BCRP activity. In the first cycle of screening with 14 compounds, TAG-11 showed the strongest effect. In the second cycle of screening of 25 TAG-11-related compounds, TAG-139 showed the strongest effect. Reversal of SN-38 and mitoxantrone resistance in K562/BCRP cells by TAG-139 was 5-fold stronger than that by estrone. Dose-dependent characteristics of drug resistance reversal with estrone and TAG-139 were very similar, suggesting that estrone and tamoxifen derivatives interact with the same drug-binding site of BCRP. Derivatives of antiestrogens that exhibit no other biological effects promise to be useful in overcoming BCRP-mediated drug resistance.

Introduction

Tumor cells that acquire resistance to certain chemotherapeutic agents sometimes develop cross-resistance to other structurally unrelated agents (1). This phenomenon is known as multidrug resistance. A family of ABC3transporters such as MDR1 gene product P-glycoprotein (1,2) and MRP1 (3) is involved in multidrug resistance, which pump out various structurally unrelated antitumor agents in an energy-dependent manner.

BCRP, also called ABCG2, ABCP, or MXR, is a halfmolecule ABC transporter with a NH2-terminal ATP-binding site and a COOH-terminal transmembrane domain (4–8). The BCRP gene was first identified as an ABC transporter overexpressed in the placenta (6,9). We showed that BCRP acts as a homodimer (10). Cells that overexpress BCRP show resistance to SN-38, mitoxantrone, and topotecan. BCRP presumably acts as an efflux pump, resulting in decreased intracellular concentrations of these anticancer agents (4–8).

BCRP is highly expressed in the placenta and digestive tract0 (9). Our recent study suggests that BCRP may transport estrogens such as estrone and 17β-estradiol from the placenta to mother’s body (11). BCRP expression is found in capillary endothelial cells, hematopoietic stem cells, and mother-placenta barrier, suggesting that BCRP may play a protective role against toxic substances and metabolites (12,13).

Recently, BCRP expression was reported in relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies (14,15). Some reports showed the association of BCRP expression with poor responses to chemotherapy (15,16). It is possible that BCRP expression is responsible, at least in part, for clinical drug resistance. If it should be true, overcoming BCRP-mediated drug resistance would contribute to cancer chemotherapy. Reversal of drug resistance was first demonstrated in the inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance by verapamil (17,18). Clinical studies of P-glycoprotein inhibitors such as PSC-833 and MS-209 are ongoing (19). After our finding that estrogens reverse BCRP-mediated drug resistance, we examined the effect of synthetic estrogen antagonists and agonists on the cellular uptake of topotecan and cytotoxicity of SN-38 and mitoxantrone on BCRPexpressing K562 cells. Among the compounds tested, diethylstilbestrol strongly reversed drug resistance in K562/BCRP cells. Next, various tamoxifen derivatives were screened for anti-BCRP activity, and after two cycles of screening, TAG-139 was identified as the strongest BCRP inhibitor among the tamoxifen derivatives examined. More extensive screening of BCRP antagonists is ongoing in our laboratory.

Materials and Methods

Cells and Cell Culture.

K562 human myelogenous leukemia cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C with 5% CO2. KB-3-1 human carcinoma cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C with 5% CO2. K562/BCRP cells were established by the transduction of K562 cells with HaMycBCRP retrovirus that carries Myc-tagged human BCRP cDNA in Ha retrovirus vector (10). K562/MDR cells were established by the transduction of K562 cells with HaMDR retrovirus that carries human MDR1 cDNA (20). KB/MRP was made by introducing an expression vector, pJ3ù-MRP, containing the human MRP1 cDNA into KB-3-1 cells (21). These stable drug-resistant cell lines were maintained in drug-free medium for up to 3 months.

Western Blot Analysis.

The anti-BCRP polyclonal antibody 3488 was raised by immunizing rabbits with a KLH-conjugated 20-mer peptide corresponding to the amino acid sequence 340–359 of human BCRP protein (10). Anti-P-glycoprotein monoclonal antibody C219 and anti-MRP1 monoclonal antibody MRPm6 were purchased from Centocor (Malvern, PA) and Nichirei (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Cell lysates were solubilized with 2% SDS, 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, and resolved by 4–20% SDS-PAGE (20 μg protein/lane). After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were then incubated with anti-BCRP, anti-P-glycoprotein, or anti-MRP1 antibody. After washing, the blots were incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Membrane-bound peroxidase was visualized using ECL Plus chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Growth Inhibition Assay.

The effects of compounds on the sensitivity of cells to SN-38, mitoxantrone, and topotecan were evaluated by measuring cell growth inhibition after incubation at 37°C for 5 days in the absence or presence of various concentrations of anticancer drugs in combination with the test compounds. Cell numbers were determined with a Coulter counter. IC50s (drug dose causing 50% inhibition of cell growth) were determined from growth inhibition curves.

Intracellular Drug Accumulation.

The effect of compounds on cellular accumulation of topotecan was determined by flow cytometry. Cells (5 × 105) were incubated with 20 μm topotecan for 30 min at 37°C in the absence or presence of the test compounds (30 μm), washed in ice-cold PBS, and subjected to fluorescence analysis using a FACS Calibur with 488 nm excitation (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA).

Antiestrogen Activity.

Antiestrogen activity of TAGcompounds was estimated by the inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-α and ER-β using ligand screening system for ERs α and β (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) under protocols recommended by the supplier. Briefly, to examine anti-ER-α activity, test sample, 17β-estradiol, and recombinant human ER-α were incubated for 60 min at 4°C in a plate coated with anti-ER-α. Free 17β-estradiol that did not bind to ER-α was quantified in the subsequent enzyme immunoassay. The supernatant containing free 17β-estradiol was transferred to an anti-17β-estradiol-coated plate together with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated 17β-estradiol. After the reaction for 60 min at 4°C, horseradish peroxidase bound to the plate was visualized by the addition of a color substrate. Anti-ER-β activity was also measured with a similar method using recombinant human ER-β. The degree of binding inhibition was calculated as the ratio of decrease in estradiol binding in the presence of 37.5 nm test compound divided by that in the presence of 300 nm diethylstilbestrol.

Results

Immunoblot Analysis of BCRP, P-glycoprotein, and MRP1.

K562/BCRP cells were established by the transduction of K562 cells with HaMycBCRP retrovirus and the subsequent selection of transduced cells with 20 ng/ml SN-38 for 5 days. K562/MDR cells were established by the transduction of K562 cells with HaMDR retrovirus and the subsequent selection of transduced cells with 4 ng/ml vincristine for 7 days. KB/MRP was established by the transfection of KB-3-1 cells with an MRP1-expression plasmid, pJ3ù-MRP and the subsequent selection of transfected cells with increasing concentrations of doxorubicin. The expressions of BCRP, P-glycoprotein, and MRP1 in these cell lines were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1). BCRP expression was detected in K562/BCRP (Fig. 1A). The BCRP expression level in K562/BCRP was ∼3-fold higher than the level of human leukemia RPMI8226 that expresses the highest amount of BCRP among 59 cell lines in the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screening panel (22).KB-3-1, KB/MRP, K562, and K562/MDR cells did not express detectable amounts of BCRP. K562/BCRP cells were propagated in drug-free medium. No significant decrease in BCRP expression was observed for 3 months. K562/BCRP cells showed 10–24-fold higher resistances to SN-38, mitoxantrone, and topotecan than parental K562 cells (Table 1). P-glycoprotein expression was detected only in K562/MDR cells (Fig. 1B). KB/MRP cells highly expressed MRP1 protein (Fig. 1C). Low-level expression of MRP1 was also detected in the other cell lines.

BCRP-reversing Activity of Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists.

For the screening of BCRP-reversing agents among commonly used estrogen antagonists and agonists, effect of agents on the cellular accumulation of topotecan was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis. Structures of estrone, a representative steroid with BCRP-reversing activity, and commercially available estrogen antagonists and agonists used in this study are shown in Fig. 2, and results of FACS analysis are shown in Fig. 3. After incubating cells with 20 μm topotecan, cellular fluorescence of K562/BCRP increased only marginally (Fig. 3A), whereas significant increase in fluorescence was observed in K562 cells(Fig. 3G), suggesting that BCRP expressed in K562/BCRP actively pumps out topotecan from the cells. Intracellular accumulation of topotecan increased in the presence of estrone in K562/BCRP cells(Fig. 3B), whereas level was not altered in K562 cells(Fig. 3H) . Tamoxifen and toremifene slightly increased the topotecan accumulation in K562/BCRP cells (Fig. 3,C and D). Diethylstilbestrol showed stronger activity in increasing topotecan accumulation in K562/BCRP cells than estrone (Fig. 3E) and showed no effect on K562 cells (Fig. 3J). Diethylstilbestrol dipropionate also showed BCRP-reversing activity similar to that of estrone (Fig. 3F).

Effects of estrone, estrogen antagonists, and agonists on cellular drug resistance were evaluated by growth inhibition assay using fixed doses of test compounds in combination with increasing concentrations of the antitumor agents(Fig. 4). Concentrations of reversing agents used in this experiment were determined based on their toxicity without SN-38 or mitoxantrone. The highest dose was first set as 10 μm, and if an agent showed significant growth inhibition at 10 μm, the concentration was lowered so that the reversing agent would not cause >30% growth inhibition when it was added to the culture alone. Estrone enhanced the cytotoxicities of SN-38 and mitoxantrone on K562/BCRP cells in a dose-dependent manner, whereas it did not affect the cytotoxicity of these drugs on K562 cells (Fig. 4A). The reversal activity of estrone was more prominent for mitoxantrone than for SN-38. Tamoxifen showed no effect on the SN-38 sensitivity of K562/BCRP cells (Fig. 4, B-1). Interestingly, mitoxantrone cytotoxicity on parental K562 cells was enhanced in the presence of tamoxifen at low doses in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4, B-2). Tamoxifen also potentiated the mitoxantrone cytotoxicity on K562/BCRP cells (Fig. 4, B-2). Toremifene, an analogue of tamoxifen, also showed a potentiation of mitoxantrone cytotoxicity on K562 and K562/BCRP cells with different dose-dependent characteristics (Fig. 4, C-2). Diethylstilbestrol showed strong reversing activity. Diethylstilbestrol at 0.5 μm and estrone at 3 μm showed similar potentiation of SN-38 and mitoxantrone cytotoxicity on K562/BCRP cells (Fig. 4D). Diethylstilbestrol dipropionate showed somewhat lower reversing activity than diethylstilbestrol (Fig. 4E).

Screening of BCRP Antagonists.

On the basis of the current finding that antiestrogens reverse BCRP-mediated drug resistance, we undertook to screen BCRP antagonists from a chemical library of tamoxifen derivatives. The first cycle of screening was carried out using 14 compounds (TAG-1–TAG-14) with relatively diverse structures and identified TAG-11 as a first-generation lead compound. The second cycle of screening was carried out using 25 TAG-11-related compounds (TAG-22–TAG-152). Structures of the representative 12 compounds are shown in Fig. 5. The effect of these 12 compounds on the cellular accumulation of topotecan was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 6). Tamoxifen at 30 μm slightly increased topotecan uptake in K562/BCRP cells (Fig. 6B). Among 12 compounds, TAG-5, TAG-8, TAG-11, TAG-72, TAG-126, and TAG-139 showed stronger activity in increasing topotecan accumulation in K562/BCRP cells than the other compounds, suggesting that triphenylethylene derivatives with N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy group have anti-BCRP activity (Fig. 6). TAG-compounds themselves are not fluorescent because cellular fluorescence without topotecan unchanged in the presence of 30 μm TAG-compounds. TAG-compounds did not affect the topotecan fluorescence of K562 cells, suggesting that increases in topotecan fluorescence of K562/BCRP in the presence of TAG-compounds are BCRP specific (data not shown).

Next, the effects of 12 TAG-compounds on SN-38 cytotoxicity in K562/BCRP were evaluated with fixed doses of reversing agents at 1 μm and/or 3 μm (Table 2). Mitoxantrone was not used in this experiment because of the synergistic effect of mitoxantrone and tamoxifen derivatives on K562 cells. IC50s of these TAG-compounds, except TAG-72 and TAG-126 in K562 and K562/BCRP cells, were >3 μm. TAG-72 and TAG-126 showed strong growth inhibitory effect at 3 μm, therefore reversal effect of TAG-72 and TAG-126 were tested only at 1 μm. As shown in Table 2, TAG-8, TAG-11, and TAG-139 at 3 μm strongly potentiated SN-38 cytotoxicity on K562/BCRP cells. TAG-139 showed the strongest reversal effect. TAG-126 at 1 μm also showed reversing effect similar to TAG-11 at 1 μm. This result showed good correlation with the FACS results (Fig. 6). TAG-11 and TAG-139 enhanced the cytotoxicity of SN-38 and mitoxantrone on K562/BCRP cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7).TAG-11 showed similar cytotoxicity on K562 and K562/BCRP cells with the IC50 of 4.2 and 4.1 μm, respectively. TAG-139 also showed similar cytotoxicity on K562 and K562/BCRP cells with the IC50 of 3.8 μm. TAG-139 showed stronger reversal effect than TAG-11. The reversal activities of TAG-11 and TAG-139 were more prominent for mitoxantrone than for SN-38. Like tamoxifen, TAG-11 and TAG-139 potentiated the cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone on K562 cells(Fig. 7).

Antiestrogen Activity.

To examine whether BCRP reversing activities of these compounds are associated with antiestrogen activity, effects of compounds on the binding of estradiol to ER-α and ER-β were evaluated. As shown in Fig. 8A, tamoxifen and 4-OH-tamoxifen strongly inhibited the binding of estradiol to ER-α. TAG-11 showed weak inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-α. TAG-72 and TAG-126, which showed modest BCRP-reversing activity, strongly inhibited estradiol binding to ER-α. TAG-139, the strongest BCRP inhibitor among TAG-compounds examined, showed weak interaction with ER-α. Similar results were obtained with ER-β(Fig. 8B). These results suggest that BCRP-reversing activity and antiestrogen activity may be disassociated. Therefore, it should be possible to develop BCRP-reversing agents exhibiting no other biological effects including antiestrogen activity.

Effect of TAG-139 on MDR1-transduced Cells and MRP1-transfected Cells.

To examine the transporter specificity of TAG-139, possible reversing effect of TAG-139 on MDR1- and MRP1-expressing cells were examined. As shown in Fig. 9., TAG-139 at 1 or 2 μm strongly potentiated the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin and vincristine on K562/MDR cells. The reversal activity of TAG-139 was more prominent for doxorubicin than for vincristine(Fig. 9A) . TAG-139 showed no effect on MRP1-mediated doxorubicin resistance and VP-16 resistance(Fig. 9B).

Discussion

In this study, estrogen antagonists and agonists increased the cellular accumulation of topotecan in BCRP-expressing cells and reversed BCRP-mediated drug resistance. Estrone and diethylstilbestrol enhanced the cytotoxicity of SN-38 and mitoxantrone on K562/BCRP cells, whereas they did not affect the cytotoxicity of either of these drugs on K562 cells. Diethylstilbestrol showed stronger BCRP-reversing activity than estrone. Estrone at 3 μm and diethylstilbestrol at 0.5 μm showed similar reversing effects of SN-38 and mitoxantrone resistance in K562/BCRP cells. Therefore, diethylstilbestrol may be a practical parental compound for the screening of BCRP antagonists. However, diethylstilbestrol showed a strong growth inhibitory effect even at 1 μm. Diethylstilbestrol dipropionate showed weaker BCRP antagonist activity and growth inhibitory effect than diethylstilbestrol.

We chose a chemical library of tamoxifen derivatives to screen for BCRP antagonists. This rationale was based on: (a) many compounds are already made and available; (b) synthesis of new compounds is relatively easy; and (c) toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics have been well studied. Before starting a screening of TAGcompounds, it was not clear whether tamoxifen and/or toremifene actually reverse BCRP-mediated drug resistance. From a series of experiments using tamoxifen derivatives, however, many TAG-compounds inhibited the function of BCRP. Therefore, the parental compounds, tamoxifen and toremifene, seem to weakly interact with BCRP. TAG-139 was identified as the strongest BCRP antagonist examined. Estrone at 3 μm and TAG-139 at 0.5 μm showed similar reversing effects on SN-38 and mitoxantrone resistance in K562/BCRP cells. Estrone at 10 μm and TAG-139 at 2 μm showed similar reversing effects. TAG-139 at 2 μm showed marginal growth inhibitory effect on either K562 or K562/BCRP cells. Consequently, TAG-139 was 5-fold more active as a BCRP antagonist than estrone. The reversal activities of estrone, diethylstilbestrol, and TAG-139 were more prominent for mitoxantrone than for SN-38. Reversal of SN-38 and mitoxantrone resistances in K562/BCRP cells by TAG-139 was stronger than that by estrone, however, the dosedependent characteristics of drug resistance reversal by TAG-139 (Fig. 7B) and estrone (Fig. 4A) were very similar. This suggests that tamoxifen derivatives and estrone interact with the same drug-binding site of BCRP.

We showed that there was no correlation between BCRP-reversing activity and antiestrogen activity (Fig. 8). Therefore it should be possible to develop anti-BCRP compound without antiestrogen activity. As shown in Fig. 8, TAG-139, the best compound found in this study, showed significant antiestrogen activity. The anti-BCRP activity of TAG-139 was weaker than that of a reported anti-BCRP agent fumitremorgin C (23). Therefore, TAG-139 should be treated as a lead for the development of the third generation compounds. TAG-139 showed reversing activity on P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance but not on MRP1-mediated drug resistance (Fig. 9). Subsequently, it should be practical to develop stronger BCRP-reversing agents that have no antiestrogen or any other biological activity and show low cytotoxicity. In our preliminary study, some BCRP antagonists were effective against BCRP-transduced P388 cells both in vitro and in vivo. The effect of BCRP-reversing agents against BCRP-expressing tumor cells as well as the specificity of inhibition, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity of drugs should be evaluated more extensively.

Interestingly, mitoxantrone cytotoxicity on parental K562 cells was enhanced in the presence of tamoxifen, toremifene, or TAG-compounds, but SN-38 cytotoxicity was not (Figs. 4 and 7). This synergistic effect also occurred in murine lymphoma P388. We have previously reported a similar synergistic effect with mitoxantrone and progesterone (11). The profiles of synergistic effects of mitoxantrone/progesterone and mitoxantrone/tamoxifen derivatives on K562 cells look very similar. Maximum increase in mitoxantrone sensitivity was ∼2-fold, and a synergistic effect occurred with <1 μm of progesterone or tamoxifen derivatives. This synergistic effect does not seem to be related to anti-BCRP activity of tamoxifen derivatives. However, it is not clear at present whether this synergistic effect is related to cytotoxicity or antiestrogen activity of the compounds. This synergistic effect of mitoxantrone and tamoxifen derivatives may have caused some confusion to evaluate anti-BCRP activity of tamoxifen derivatives, but these two potentiation effects are independent of each other.

Recent reports showed the association of BCRP expression with poor responses to chemotherapy (15,16). It is possible that BCRP expression is responsible, at least in part, for clinical drug resistance. If it should be true, overcoming BCRP-mediated drug resistance would contribute to cancer chemotherapy. Additionally, BCRP is overexpressed in some cancer cell lines other than those of the genital organs (22) and may underlie the natural resistance to antitumor agents. GF120918 and fumitremorgin C have been found to reverse BCRP-mediated drug resistance (23,24). We previously identified steroid hormones of placental origin as the first endogenous compounds with BCRP-reversing activity (11). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that estrogen agonists and antiestrogens reverse BCRP-mediated drug resistance.

Another significance of the current finding is the possible effect of clinically used antiestrogens on the bioavailability of BCRP-interacting anticancer agents. BCRP inhibitors, like P-glycoprotein inhibitors, not only potentiate the cytotoxicity on BCRP-expressing cells but also alter the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of drugs distributed by BCRP (19,25). A P-glycoprotein inhibitor GF120918 increased oral bioavailability of topotecan through the inhibition of BCRP function (25). The camptothecins are good BCRP substrates and are increasingly used in chemotherapy. Some topoisomerase I inhibitors also appear to be excellent substrates. Modulation of BCRP activity by inhibitors should alter the pharmacokinetics of such drugs in a number of contexts. These effects might be used to advantage in improving several aspects of chemotherapy such as reduction of the variability in exposure to p.o. administered topotecan and potentiation of the cytotoxic activity of irinotecan. In addition to that, unintentional side effects may be caused because of the modulation of bioavailability by the inhibition of transporters. Recently, methotrexate was identified as a substrate of BCRP (26). Tamoxifen and methotrexate have been used widely for the treatment of breast cancer. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the coadministration of these drugs.

In summary, some estrogen agonists and antiestrogens were found to restore drug sensitivity in K562/BCRP cells by increasing the cellular accumulation of anticancer drugs. These findings should serve for the development of more practical therapies and the design of more effective and safe reagents to circumvent drug resistance. These findings should also contribute to design new types of transporter-directed combination chemotherapy and to avoid unintentional potentiation of anticancer drugs because of the inhibition of BCRP.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Expression of BCRP, P-glycoprotein, and MRP1 in the transfectants. Protein samples (20 μg protein/lane) were resolved by 4–20% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. A, blots were treated with anti-BCRP antibody 3488. B, blots were treated with anti-P-glycoprotein antibody C219. C, blots were treated with anti-MRP1 antibody MRPm6. The blots were incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Membrane-bound peroxidase was visualized using ECL Plus chemiluminescence detection kit. Lane 1: KB-3-1; Lane 2: KB/MRP; Lane 3: K562; Lane 4: K562/MDR; and Lane 5: K562/BCRP.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Chemical structures of estrone, estrogen antagonists, and estrogen agonists.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effect of estrone, estrogen antagonists, and estrogen agonists on the intracellular accumulation of topotecan in K562 and K562/BCRP cells. Cells were incubated with or without 20 μm topotecan in the presence or absence of 30 μm test compound. Cellular content of topotecan was measured by FACS. Bold lines, with topotecan; dotted lines, without topotecan. In K562/BCRP cells with topotecan (bold line), a fluorescence peak shift to the right indicates cellular uptake of topotecan in the presence of estrone or other test compounds, whereas a slight shift occurred in the absence of test compounds. In contrast, fluorescence peak shifts to the right were observed in K562 cells, irrespective of the type of test compounds.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Reversal of BCRP-mediated drug resistance by estrone, estrogen antagonists, and agonists. K562 (open symbols) and K562/BCRP (closed symbols) cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of SN-38 or mitoxantrone in the absence or presence of fixed doses of estrone, estrogen antagonists, or agonists. Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter. Each point is an average of triplicate determinations. SDs are <10% of mean values. A, effect of estrone on the sensitivity to SN-38 (A-1) and mitoxantrone (A-2). B, effect of tamoxifen on the sensitivity to SN-38 (B-1) and mitoxantrone (B-2). C, effect of toremifene on the sensitivity to SN-38 (C-1) and mitoxantrone (C-2). D, effect of diethylstilbestrol on the sensitivity to SN-38 (D-1) and mitoxantrone (D-2). E, effect of diethylstilbestrol dipropionate on the sensitivity to SN-38 (E-1) and mitoxantrone (E-2).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Chemical structures of TAG-1–TAG-139 used in the screening of anti-BCRP activity.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Effects of TAG-1–TAG-139 on the intracellular accumulation of topotecan in K562/BCRP cells. Cells were incubated with or without 20 μm topotecan in the presence or absence of 30 μm TAG-compounds. Cellular content of topotecan was measured by FACS. Bold lines, with topotecan; dotted lines, without topotecan. With topotecan (bold line), a fluorescence peak shift to the right indicates cellular uptake of topotecan in the presence of TAG-compounds, although a slight shift occurred in the absence of compounds. In K562 cells, TAG-compounds did not affect topotecan uptake (data not shown).

Fig. 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7

Reversal of BCRP-mediated drug resistance by TAG-11 and TAG-139. K562 (open symbols) and K562/BCRP (closed symbols) cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of SN-38 or mitoxantrone in the absence or presence of TAG-11 (0.5, 1, or 2 μm). Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter. Each point is an average of triplicate determinations. SDs are <10% of mean values. A, effect of TAG-11 on the sensitivity to SN-38 (A-1) and mitoxantrone (A-2). B, effect of TAG-139 on the sensitivity to SN-38 (B-1) and mitoxantrone (B-2).

Fig. 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8

Antiestrogen activity of TAG-compounds. Antiestrogen activity of TAG-compounds was estimated by the inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-α and ER-β using enzyme immunoassay. Degree of binding inhibition was calculated as the ratio of decrease in estradiol binding in the presence of 37.5 nm test compound divided by that in the presence of 300 nm diethylstilbestrol. Data are represented as mean values ± SD. A, inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-α. B, inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-β.

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Effect of TAG-139 on P-glycoprotein- and MRP1-mediated drug resistance. Cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of anticancer agents in the absence or presence of TAG-139 (1 or 2 μm). Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter. Each point is an average of triplicate determinations. SDs are <10% of mean values. A, effect of TAG-139 on the doxorubicin sensitivity (A-1) and vincristine sensitivity (A-2) of K562 (open symbols) and K562/MDR (closed symbols) cells. B, effect of TAG-139 on the doxorubicin sensitivity (B-1) and VP-16 sensitivity (B-2) of KB-3–1 (open symbols) and KB/MDR (closed symbols) cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Drug resistance of K562/BCRP cellsa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Reversal of BCRP-mediated SN-38 resistance by TAG-compoundsa

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported, in part, by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and the Virtual Research Institute of Aging of Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Japan.

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: ABC, ATP-binding cassette; BCRP, breast cancer resistance protein; K562/BCRP, BCRP-transduced K562; ER, estrogen receptor; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

    • Accepted November 19, 2002.
    • Received August 20, 2002.
    • Revision received October 10, 2002.
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    Gottesman, M. M., Hrycyna, C. A., Schoenlein, P. V., Germann, U. A., and Pastan, I. Genetic analysis of the multidrug transporter. Annu. Rev. Genet., 29: 607 –649,1995 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Chen, C. J., Chin, J. E., Ueda, K., Clark, D. P., Pastan, I., Gottesman, M. M., and Roninson, I. B. Internal duplication and homology with bacterial transport proteins in the mdr1 (P-glycoprotein) gene from multidrug-resistant human cells. Cell, 47: 381 –389,1986 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Cole, S. P., Bhardwaj, G., Gerlach, J. H., Mackie, J. E., Grant, C. E., Almquist, K. C., Stewart, A. J., Kurz, E. U., Duncan, A. M., and Deeley, R. G. Overexpression of a transporter gene in a multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line. Science (Wash. DC), 258: 1650 –1654,1992 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Miyake, K., Mickley, L., Litman, T., Zhan, Z., Robey, R., Cristensen, B., Brangi, M., Greenberger, L., Dean, M., Fojo, T., and Bates, S. E. Molecular cloning of cDNAs which is highly overexpressed in mitoxantrone-resistant cells: demonstration of homology to ABC transport genes. Cancer Res., 59: 8 –13,1999 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. Doyle, L. A., Yang, W., Abruzzo, L. V., Krogmann, T., Gao, Y., Rishi, A. K., and Ross, D. D. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 15665 –15670,1998 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Allikmets, R., Schriml, L., Hutchinson, A., Romano-Spica, V., and Dean, M. A human placenta-specific ATP-binding cassette gene (ABCP) on chromosome 4q22 that is involved in multidrug resistance. Cancer Res., 58: 5337 –5339,1998 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. Maliepaard, M., van Gastelen, M. A., de Jong, L. A., Pluim, D., van Waardenburg, R. C., Ruevekamp-Helmers, M. C., Floot, B. G., and Schellens, J. H. Overexpression of the BCRP/MXR/ABCP gene in a topotecan-selected ovarian tumor cell line. Cancer Res., 59: 4559 –4563,1999 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Kawabata, S., Oka, M., Shiozawa, K., Tsukamoto, K., Nakatomi, K., Soda, H., Fukuda, M., Ikegami, Y., Sugahara, K., Yamada, Y., Kamihira, S., Doyle, L. A., Ross, D. D., and Kohno, S. Breast cancer resistance protein directly confers SN-38 resistance of lung cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 280: 1216 –1223,2001 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Maliepaard, M., Scheffer, G. L., Faneyte, I. F., van Gastelen, M. A., Pijnenborg, A. C., Schinkel, A. H., van de Vijver, M. J., Scheper, R. J., and Schellens, H. M. Subcellular localization and distribution of the breast cancer resistant protein transporter in normal human tissue. Cancer Res., 61: 3458 –3464,2001 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Kage, K., Tsukahara, S., Sugiyama, T., Asada, S., Ishikawa, E., Tsuruo, T., and Sugimoto, Y. Dominant-negative inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein as drug efflux pump through the inhibition of S-S dependent homodimerization. Int. J. Cancer, 97: 626 –630,2002 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Imai, Y., Tsukahara, S., Ishikawa, E., Tsuruo, T., and Sugimoto, Y. Estrone and 17β-estradiol reverse breast cancer resistance proteinmediated multidrug resistance. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 93: 231 –235,2002 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Eisenblatter, T., and Galla, H. J. A new multidrug resistance protein at the blood-brain barrier. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 293: 1273 –1278,2002 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Zhou, S., Schuetz, J. D., Bunting, K. D., Colapietro, A. M., Sampath, J., Morris, J. J., Lagutina, I., Grosveld, G. C., Osawa, M., Nakauchi, H., and Sorrentino, B. P. The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat. Med., 7: 1028 –1034,2001 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    van der Kolk, D. M., Vellenga, E., Scheffer, G. L., Muller, M., Bates, S. E., Scheper, R. J., and de Vries, E. G. Expression and activity of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in de novo and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 99: 3763 –3770,2002 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M., Wiemer, E. A., Prins, A., Meijerink, J. P., Vossebeld, P. J., van der Holt, B., Pieters, R., and Sonneveld, P. Increased expression of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemia (Baltimore), 16: 833 –839,2002 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Steinbach, D., Sell, W., Voigt, A., Hermann, J., Zintl, F., and Sauerbrey, A. BCRP gene expression is associated with a poor response to remission induction therapy in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia (Baltimore), 16: 1443 –1447,2002 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Tsuruo, T., Iida, H., Tsukagoshi, S., and Sakurai, Y. Overcoming of vincristine resistance in P388 leukemia in vivo and in vitro through enhanced cytotoxicity of vincristine and vinblastine by verapamil. Cancer Res., 41: 1967 –1972,1981 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Tsuruo, T., Iida, H., Tsukagoshi, S., and Sakurai, Y. Increased accumulation of vincristine and adriamycin in drug-resistant P388 tumor cells following incubation with calcium antagonists and calmodulin inhibitors. Cancer Res., 42: 4730 –4733,1982 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Oza, A. M. Clinical development of P-glycoprotein modulators in oncology. Novartis Found. Symp., 243: 103 –115,2002 .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Suzuki, M., Sugimoto, Y., and Tsuruo, T. Efficient protection of cells from the genotoxicity of nitrosoureas by the retrovirus-mediated transfer of human O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase using bicistronic vectors with human multidrug resistance gene 1. Mutat. Res., 410: 133 –141,1998 .
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    Taguchi, Y., Yoshida, A., Takada, Y., Komano, T., and Ueda, K. Anti-cancer drugs and glutathione stimulate vanadate-induced trapping of nucleotide in multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). FEBS Lett., 401: 11 –14,1997 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Imai, Y., Nakane, M., Kage, K., Tsukahara, S., Ishikawa, E., Tsuruo, T., Miki, Y., and Sugimoto, Y. C421A polymorphism in the human breast cancer resistant protein gene is associated with low expression of Q141K protein and low-level drug resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther., 1: 611 –616,2002 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Rabindran, S. K., Ross, D. D., Doyle, A., Yang, W., and Greenberger, L. M. Fumitremorgin C reverses multidrug resistance in cells transfected with the breast cancer resistance protein. Cancer Res., 60: 47 –50,2000 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    De Bruin, M., Miyake, K., Litman, T., Robey, R., and Bates, S. E. Reversal of resistance by GF120918 in cell lines expressing the ABC half-transporter. MXR. Cancer Lett., 146: 117 –126,1999 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Kruijtzer, C. M., Beijnen, J. H., Rosing, H., ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., Schot, M., Jewell, R. C., Paul, E. M., and Schellens, J. H. Increased oral bioavailability of topotecan in combination with the breast cancer resistance protein and P-glycoprotein inhibitor GF120918. J. Clin. Oncol., 20: 2943 –2950,2002 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Volk, E. L., Farley, K. M., Wu, Y., Li, F., Robey, R. W., and Schneider, E. Overexpression of wild-type breast cancer resistance protein mediates methotrexate resistance. Cancer Res., 62: 5035 –5040,2002 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 2 (1)
January 2003
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1
Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Satomi Tsukahara, Yasuo Imai, Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Kazumitsu Ueda and Takashi Tsuruo
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2003 (2) (1) 105-112;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1
Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Satomi Tsukahara, Yasuo Imai, Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Kazumitsu Ueda and Takashi Tsuruo
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2003 (2) (1) 105-112;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prediction of individual response to platinum/paclitaxel combination using novel marker genes in ovarian cancers
  • Low doses of cisplatin or gemcitabine plus Photofrin/photodynamic therapy: Disjointed cell cycle phase-related activity accounts for synergistic outcome in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer cells (H1299)
  • Mesenchymal progenitor cells as cellular vehicles for delivery of oncolytic adenoviruses
Show more Article
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement