Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Article

Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1

Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Satomi Tsukahara, Yasuo Imai, Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Kazumitsu Ueda and Takashi Tsuruo
Yoshikazu Sugimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satomi Tsukahara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuo Imai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshikazu Sugimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazumitsu Ueda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Tsuruo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published January 2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Expression of BCRP, P-glycoprotein, and MRP1 in the transfectants. Protein samples (20 μg protein/lane) were resolved by 4–20% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. A, blots were treated with anti-BCRP antibody 3488. B, blots were treated with anti-P-glycoprotein antibody C219. C, blots were treated with anti-MRP1 antibody MRPm6. The blots were incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Membrane-bound peroxidase was visualized using ECL Plus chemiluminescence detection kit. Lane 1: KB-3-1; Lane 2: KB/MRP; Lane 3: K562; Lane 4: K562/MDR; and Lane 5: K562/BCRP.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Chemical structures of estrone, estrogen antagonists, and estrogen agonists.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Effect of estrone, estrogen antagonists, and estrogen agonists on the intracellular accumulation of topotecan in K562 and K562/BCRP cells. Cells were incubated with or without 20 μm topotecan in the presence or absence of 30 μm test compound. Cellular content of topotecan was measured by FACS. Bold lines, with topotecan; dotted lines, without topotecan. In K562/BCRP cells with topotecan (bold line), a fluorescence peak shift to the right indicates cellular uptake of topotecan in the presence of estrone or other test compounds, whereas a slight shift occurred in the absence of test compounds. In contrast, fluorescence peak shifts to the right were observed in K562 cells, irrespective of the type of test compounds.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Reversal of BCRP-mediated drug resistance by estrone, estrogen antagonists, and agonists. K562 (open symbols) and K562/BCRP (closed symbols) cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of SN-38 or mitoxantrone in the absence or presence of fixed doses of estrone, estrogen antagonists, or agonists. Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter. Each point is an average of triplicate determinations. SDs are <10% of mean values. A, effect of estrone on the sensitivity to SN-38 (A-1) and mitoxantrone (A-2). B, effect of tamoxifen on the sensitivity to SN-38 (B-1) and mitoxantrone (B-2). C, effect of toremifene on the sensitivity to SN-38 (C-1) and mitoxantrone (C-2). D, effect of diethylstilbestrol on the sensitivity to SN-38 (D-1) and mitoxantrone (D-2). E, effect of diethylstilbestrol dipropionate on the sensitivity to SN-38 (E-1) and mitoxantrone (E-2).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Chemical structures of TAG-1–TAG-139 used in the screening of anti-BCRP activity.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Effects of TAG-1–TAG-139 on the intracellular accumulation of topotecan in K562/BCRP cells. Cells were incubated with or without 20 μm topotecan in the presence or absence of 30 μm TAG-compounds. Cellular content of topotecan was measured by FACS. Bold lines, with topotecan; dotted lines, without topotecan. With topotecan (bold line), a fluorescence peak shift to the right indicates cellular uptake of topotecan in the presence of TAG-compounds, although a slight shift occurred in the absence of compounds. In K562 cells, TAG-compounds did not affect topotecan uptake (data not shown).

  • Fig. 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7

    Reversal of BCRP-mediated drug resistance by TAG-11 and TAG-139. K562 (open symbols) and K562/BCRP (closed symbols) cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of SN-38 or mitoxantrone in the absence or presence of TAG-11 (0.5, 1, or 2 μm). Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter. Each point is an average of triplicate determinations. SDs are <10% of mean values. A, effect of TAG-11 on the sensitivity to SN-38 (A-1) and mitoxantrone (A-2). B, effect of TAG-139 on the sensitivity to SN-38 (B-1) and mitoxantrone (B-2).

  • Fig. 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8

    Antiestrogen activity of TAG-compounds. Antiestrogen activity of TAG-compounds was estimated by the inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-α and ER-β using enzyme immunoassay. Degree of binding inhibition was calculated as the ratio of decrease in estradiol binding in the presence of 37.5 nm test compound divided by that in the presence of 300 nm diethylstilbestrol. Data are represented as mean values ± SD. A, inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-α. B, inhibition of estradiol binding to ER-β.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Effect of TAG-139 on P-glycoprotein- and MRP1-mediated drug resistance. Cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of anticancer agents in the absence or presence of TAG-139 (1 or 2 μm). Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter. Each point is an average of triplicate determinations. SDs are <10% of mean values. A, effect of TAG-139 on the doxorubicin sensitivity (A-1) and vincristine sensitivity (A-2) of K562 (open symbols) and K562/MDR (closed symbols) cells. B, effect of TAG-139 on the doxorubicin sensitivity (B-1) and VP-16 sensitivity (B-2) of KB-3–1 (open symbols) and KB/MDR (closed symbols) cells.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Drug resistance of K562/BCRP cellsa

    DrugIC50 (ng/ml)
    Degree of resistance
    K562K562/BCRP
    SN-380.42 ± 0.0210 ± 0.324
    Mitoxantrone0.33 ± 0.023.6 ± 0.211
    Topotecan3.1 ± 0.130 ± 210
    • ↵a K562 or K562/BCRP cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of SN-38, mitoxantrone, or topotecan. Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter, and IC50 was determined. Degree of resistance is the ratio of IC50 for K562/BCRP cells divided by that for K562 cells. Data are represented as mean values ± SD from triplicate determinations.

  • Table 2

    Reversal of BCRP-mediated SN-38 resistance by TAG-compoundsa

    CompoundReversal index
    1 μm3 μm
    TamoxifenNT1.02 ± 0.02
    TAG-1NT1.11 ± 0.06
    TAG-2NT1.26 ± 0.02
    TAG-3NT1.08 ± 0.08
    TAG-5NT1.17 ± 0.11
    TAG-7NT1.15 ± 0.14
    TAG-8NT1.67 ± 0.02
    TAG-111.36 ± 0.041.91 ± 0.02
    TAG-12NT1.07 ± 0.04
    TAG-13NT1.09 ± 0.01
    TAG-721.12 ± 0.12NT
    TAG-1261.31 ± 0.14NT
    TAG-1392.32 ± 0.084.02 ± 0.12
    • a K562/BCRP cells were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of SN-38 in the absence or presence of reversing agents (1 or 3 μm, as indicated). Cell numbers were counted with a Coulter counter, and concentration of drug required for IC50 was determined. Reversal index is the ratio of IC50 in the absence of reversing agent divided by that in the presence of reversing agent. Data are represented as mean values ± SD from triplicate determinations. NT, not tested.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 2 (1)
January 2003
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1
Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Satomi Tsukahara, Yasuo Imai, Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Kazumitsu Ueda and Takashi Tsuruo
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2003 (2) (1) 105-112;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reversal of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein-mediated Drug Resistance by Estrogen Antagonists and Agonists1
Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Satomi Tsukahara, Yasuo Imai, Yoshikazu Sugimoto, Kazumitsu Ueda and Takashi Tsuruo
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2003 (2) (1) 105-112;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prediction of individual response to platinum/paclitaxel combination using novel marker genes in ovarian cancers
  • Low doses of cisplatin or gemcitabine plus Photofrin/photodynamic therapy: Disjointed cell cycle phase-related activity accounts for synergistic outcome in metastatic non–small cell lung cancer cells (H1299)
  • Semisynthetic homoharringtonine induces apoptosis via inhibition of protein synthesis and triggers rapid myeloid cell leukemia-1 down-regulation in myeloid leukemia cells
Show more Article
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement