Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Biology and Translational Studies

Serum- and Glucocorticoid-inducible Kinase 1 is Essential for Osteoclastogenesis and Promotes Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis

Zheng Zhang, Qian Xu, Chao Song, Baoguo Mi, Honghua Zhang, Honglei Kang, Huiyong Liu, Yunlong Sun, Jia Wang, Zhuowei Lei, Hanfeng Guan and Feng Li
Zheng Zhang
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zheng Zhang
Qian Xu
2Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Song
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baoguo Mi
3Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Honghua Zhang
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Honghua Zhang
Honglei Kang
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Honglei Kang
Huiyong Liu
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunlong Sun
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jia Wang
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhuowei Lei
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanfeng Guan
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lifengmd@hust.edu.cn hguan@hust.edu.cn
Feng Li
1Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lifengmd@hust.edu.cn hguan@hust.edu.cn
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0783 Published February 2020
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Bone metastasis is a severe complication associated with various carcinomas. It causes debilitating pain and pathologic fractures and dramatically impairs patients' quality of life. Drugs aimed at osteoclast formation significantly reduce the incidence of skeletal complications and are currently the standard treatment for patients with bone metastases. Here, we reported that serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) plays a pivotal role in the formation and function of osteoclasts by regulating the Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel Orai1. We showed that SGK1 inhibition represses osteoclastogenesis in vitro and prevents bone loss in vivo. Furthermore, we validated the effect of SGK1 on bone metastasis by using an intracardiac injection model in mice. Inhibition of SGK1 resulted in a significant reduction in bone metastasis. Subsequently, the Oncomine and the OncoLnc database were employed to verify the differential expression and the association with clinical outcome of SGK1 gene in patients with breast cancer. Our data mechanistically demonstrated the regulation of the SGK1 in the process of osteoclastogenesis and revealed SGK1 as a valuable target for curing bone metastasis diseases.

Introduction

Bone is a common target of metastatic spread in solid tumors. Bone metastasis is generally incurable in patients because of limited therapeutic options (1, 2). Bone metastasis can be regarded as a result of the crosstalk between bone resorption and tumor growth (3). During the process of bone metastasis, cancer cells undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), get transported as circulating tumor cells (CTC), and home to target sites (4). Presently, bisphosphonates and antibodies against receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) are the standard of care in patients with bone metastases (5–7).

Once cancer cells infiltrate bones, the metastatic cells encounter native bone microenvironmental cells. During the formation of bone metastatic lesions, various osteolytic factors aiming at osteoclasts are secreted by tumor cells. Among these factors, macrophage CSF (M-CSF) and RANKL play a central role in this multistep process (8–10). M-CSF upregulates RANK expression on osteoclast precursors and promotes osteoclast differentiation, whereas RANKL binds to RANK and cause the activation of nuclear transcriptional regulators (11). The recruitment of variable adaptor molecules then activates downstream signaling pathways, includes the NF-κB and PI3K/AKT pathways, thereby initiating osteoclast formation and activity (12–15).

In the terminal of osteoclasts differentiation, Ca2+ channels also involved. Hwang and colleagues (16) have shown that Orai1-mediated calcium entry is a major inducer and activator of nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1)-mediated RANKL signaling. RANKL evokes Ca2+ oscillations, leading to a selective and stable induction of NFATc1, a Ca2+-responsive transcription factor that drives osteoclast formation (16, 17).

Serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) belongs to a subfamily of serine/threonine kinases that is transcriptionally stimulated by serum and glucocorticoids (18). SGK1 expression is induced by insulin and growth factors via PI3K, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), or mTOR complex-2 (19–21). In mammals, SGK1 is expressed in all examined tissues and regulates a wide variety of cellular molecules, including signaling factors and ion channels (22–24). Pietro and colleagues (25) showed that SGK1 expressed in white adipose tissues promotes adipogenesis by regulating Foxo1 phosphorylation. In megakaryocytes, as a novel regulator of platelet function, SGK1 upregulates Orai1 through the NF-κB pathway and increases store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) in platelets (26). However, the role of SGK1 in osteoclast formation remains unknown.

In this study, we demonstrated that SGK1 triggers osteoclastogenesis through Orai1, and the inhibitor of SGK1 can reduce bone metastasis in vitro. Thereby SGK1 is a promising therapeutic target for bone metastasis.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

GSK650394 and BTP2 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Soluble recombinant human M-CSF and mouse RANKL were obtained from PeproTech.

Animals

C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c nu/nu mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Tongji Medical College (Wuhan, China). The mice were housed in animal care facility of Tongji Medical College at 25°C with 12-hour light/dark cycle and free access to standard chow and water. All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Research Committee of Tongji Medical College. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Intracardiac metastasis model

MDA-MB-231 cells were resuspended in sterile PBS at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells per 100 μL. We used a marked location midway between the sternal notch and the top of xiphoid process, and slightly left (anatomic) of the sternum. Four-week-old male (BALB/c nu/nu) mice were used for these experiments. A successful intracardiac injection was determined on the basis of the systemic distribution of bioluminescence throughout the animal at 12 hours postinjection. Only mice demonstrating evidence of a successful injection were used for further analyses. Four weeks after inoculation, bone metastatic cells in hind limbs were isolated and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL). Cultured bone metastatic cells were reinoculated into the left ventricle of the heart. This procedure was repeated four times until no metastases were detected in organs other than bones. These bone metastatic cells in hind limbs, designated MBS4-TJGK cells, were isolated and cultured in DMEM.

Cell culture and transfection

MDA-MB-231 and RAW264.7 cell lines were purchased from the Shanghai Institute of Life Sciences Cell Resource Center, Shanghai, China. Cell lines authentication were conducted by China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC). STR data were compared with ATCC and DSMZ, all the locations were exactly matched. BMMs were obtained from femoral and tibial bone marrow of 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice as described earlier (27). All cell cultures were regularly checked for mycoplasma contamination. BMMs and RAW264.7 were cultured and induced to osteoclast as described previously (15). Scrambled, SGK1-knockdown and Orai1-overexpression shRNA were obtained from ViGene Biosciences, Inc.

Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis

Antibodies against the following targets were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology: IκB kinase α (IKKα), p-IKKα, IκBα, p-IκBα, p65, p-p65, AKT, and phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT). Antibodies against c-Fos, NFATc1, and SGK1 was purchased from Abcam. Rabbit antibodies against the PI3K catalytic subunit p110 and Orai1, the TRAP staining kit and all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Mouse anti-β-actin and secondary antibodies were obtained from Boster. Protein bands were visualized using a ChemiDoc XRS+ System with Image Lab Software (Bio-Rad).

For IF analysis of cultured cells, BMMs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes and then blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Immunostaining was performed using the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells and cDNA was synthesized with the Easy Script First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Super Mix Kit (TransGen Biotech). Real-time PCR was performed using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TransGen Biotech). The specific primers used for PCR amplification were as follows (F, forward; R, reverse): SGK1, F 5′-TGTGAAGTCCCTTCTGTGGA-3′ and R 5′-CCATCTTCGTACCCGTTTCT-3′; TRAP, F 5′-GATGCCAGCGACAAGAGGTT-3′ and R 5′-CATACCAGGGGATGTTGCGAA-3′; NFATc1, F 5′-CAACGCCCTGACCACCGATAG-3′ and R 5′-GGGAAGTCAGAAGTGGGTGGA-3′; CK, F 5′-GAAGAAGACTCACCAGAAGCAG-3′ and R 5′-TCCAGGTTATGGGCAGAGATT-3′; MMP9, F 5′-CTGGACAGCCAGACACTAAAG-3′ and R 5′-CTCGCGGCAAGTCTTCAGAG-3′;GAPDH, F 5′-CTCCCACTCTTCCACCTTCG-3′ and R 5′-TTGCTGTAGCCGTATTCATT-3′.

Datasets of mRNA expression and clinical information

Follow-up data of 3,951 patients from Kaplan–Meier plotter (kmplot.com/analysis/) and the GEO database were included in this study, which was divided into two groups according to the expression of SGK1 (28). Expression data of SGK1 was drawn from the Oncomine dataset, which embodies large quantities of high-throughput data of varies disease.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as the means ± SD. Every experiment had a sample size greater than three and was independently performed three times, unless otherwise stated. Multigroup comparisons of the means were carried out by one-way ANOVA test with post hoc contrasts by Dunnett multiple comparisons test. Cumulative survival time was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed by the log-rank test.

Results

Suppression of SGK1 inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and impairs osteoclast function in vitro

We evaluated the expression of SGK1 during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Upon RANKL treatment, the mRNA and protein levels of SGK1 were significantly increased (Fig. 1A and B; Supplementary Fig. S1A). We treated bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMM) once a day with different concentrations of GSK650394, an SGK1 inhibitor, in the presence of RANKL (100 ng/mL) and M-CSF (30 ng/mL) for 7 days (29). Osteoclast formation were inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1C and D). Subsequently, the potential toxicity of GSK650394 was evaluated by measuring the proliferation of BMMs via the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) after treating the cells with different concentrations of GSK650394. However, the proliferation of BMMs was not markedly altered by GSK650394 at concentrations lower than 2 μmol/L (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

SGK1 is upregulated during osteoclast differentiation, and inhibition of SGK1 suppresses osteoclast differentiation and function. A and B, BMMs were cultured in the presence of M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) and were collected at the indicated time points to analyze SGK1 expression via quantitative real-time RT-PCR and Western blotting. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 (Dunnett t test) versus day 0 group. C, BMMs (1.5 × 104 cells/well) were incubated in complete medium containing M-CSF, RANKL, and varying concentrations of GSK650394 (0, 0.5, 1, and 2 μmol/L) for 7 days. Then, the cells were fixed and stained for TRAP. D, TRAP-positive multinucleated (≥3 nuclei) osteoclasts were counted in each well of a 96-well plate, and the results were displayed in a histogram. Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 (Dunnett t test) versus the vehicle-treated group. E, BMMs (4 × 103 cells/well) were cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and treated with varying concentrations of GSK650394 (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 μmol/L) for 5 days. Cell proliferation was assessed by the Cell Counting Kit-8. Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. F, SGK1 protein expression in BMMs was assessed by Western blotting. ACTB was used as a loading control. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. G, BMMs cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1.0 × 104 cells/well, transfected with SGK1-specific shRNAs and cultured in the presence of RANKL (100 ng/mL) for 5 days. TRAP staining was performed. H, TRAP-positive cells with ≥3 nuclei were counted. Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001 (Dunnett t test) versus the vector group. ****, P < 0.0001 (Dunnett t test) versus the vector group. I, BMMs cultured in 96-well plates were treated with M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) for 5 days and then seeded in Corning Osteo Assay Surface and incubated with different concentrations of GSK650394 for 72 hours. J, Bone resorption area was measured. Results shown are the percentage of eroded area of the total area. Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 (Dunnett t test) versus the vehicle-treated group.

To control the possible off-target effects of GSK650394, we knocked down SGK1 in RAW264.7 cells using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs; Supplementary Fig. S1B). Moreover, three shRNA lentiviruses tested (sh1, sh2, sh3) were selected to create stable SGK1 knockdown in both BMMs and RAW264.7 cells. The protein level of SGK1 was reduced as shown in Fig. 1F and Supplementary Fig. S1C. Upon RANKL treatment, osteoclast formation was significantly inhibited in cells with either siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown of SGK1 (Fig. 1G and H; Supplementary Fig. S1D–S1F). Therefore, SGK1 activity is upregulated during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis, and the suppression of SGK1 inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro.

Given that osteoclast formation was impaired in SGK1-knockdown osteoclast precursors, we next investigated the effect of GSK650394 on bone resorption. Mature osteoclasts were seeded in calcium phosphate-coated plates in the presence of RANKL and M-CSF and treated with different concentrations of GSK650394 for 3 days. Compared with that in control cells, the formation of resorption pits in vitro was significantly reduced in GSK650394-treated osteoclasts (Fig. 1I and J). The luciferase reporter gene assays also suggested that GSK650394 treatment inhibited NF-κB luciferase reporter in BMMs (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Thus, impaired SGK1 activity inhibits the resorption function of mature osteoclasts.

SGK1 modulates the NF-κB and PI3K/AKT pathways in osteoclastogenesis

The NF-κB and PI3K/AKT transcription factor families are both downstream of TRAF6, which play pivotal roles in osteoclastogenesis. SGK1 is known to modulate transcription by upregulating NF-κB activity through the phosphorylation and activation of IKKα, whereas in the PI3K/AKT pathway, SGK1 is highly homologous to AKT and is a critical downstream mediator of PDK1 (24). Specific inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT pathway result in the reciprocal activation of SGK1 (20). To explore the potential mechanisms by which SGK1 modulates osteoclastogenesis, we analyzed the expression of proteins associated with osteoclast formation in BMMs. Western blot analysis showed that the inhibition of SGK1 via GSK650394 dramatically suppressed the RANKL-induced phosphorylation and degradation of IKKα, IκBα, and p65 approximately 60 minutes after stimulation with RANKL (Fig. 2A; Supplementary Fig. S2A). Moreover, regarding to the AKT/PI3K pathway, GSK650394 treatment decreased the levels of p-AKT and the PI3K catalytic subunit p110 (Fig. 2B; Supplementary Fig. S2B). Therefore, the suppression of SGK1 inhibits RANKL-induced NF-κB and PI3K/AKT activation.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

GSK650394 inhibits RANKL-induced activation of the NF-κB, PI3K pathways, and suppresses the expression of c-Fos/NFATc1 and osteoclast marker genes. A, GSK650394 inhibits RANKL-induced phosphorylation of NF-κB. BMMs were starved in 0.5% FBS in α-MEM for 12 hours before treatment and then pretreated with or without GSK650394 (2 μmol/L) for 24 hours followed by RANKL (100 ng/mL) stimulation for the indicated times. Cell lysates were extracted for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. B, Effect on PI3K activation. BMMs were treated as described above, and total cell protein was fractionated for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. C, GSK650394 inhibits RANKL-induced protein expression of c-Fos and NFATc1. BMMs treated with or without GSK650394 (2 μmol/L) were cultured in the presence of M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) and collected at the indicated time points for the analysis of c-fos and NFATc1 protein expression. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. D and E, GSK650394 suppresses RANKL-induced mRNA expression of TRAP, NFATc1, CK, and MMP9. BMMs were treated with or without GSK650394 (2 μmol/L) for 2 or 5 days. Total RNA was isolated and analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Data represent the means ± SDs. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (Tukey test).

Suppression of SGK1 inhibits RANKL-induced c-Fos and NFATc1 expression and downregulates the expression of osteoclast maker genes

To determine whether the suppression of SGK1 inhibits the expression of c-Fos and NFATc1, which are essential transcription factors in osteoclast formation, we analyzed the expression of these two factors by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S2B, the protein levels of c-Fos and NFATc1 were upregulated during RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, which can be prevented efficiently by GSK650394 treatment.

We then tested whether GSK650394 suppresses the expression of osteoclast marker genes such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), MMP9, NFATc1, and cathepsin K (CK); notably, TRAP, MMP9, and CK are target genes of NFATc1 (30). As shown in Fig. 2D and E, GSK650394 inhibited the mRNA expression of MMP9 and CK during late stages of osteoclastogenesis and inhibited TRAP and NFATc1 at both early and late stages of osteoclastogenesis, respectively.

Activation of Orai1 abolishes the inhibition of osteoclastogenesis by GSK650394

Orai1 is a SOCE channel on membrane, which regulates Ca2+ oscillations and NFATc1 transactivation during osteoclastogenesis (31). Immunofluorescence (IF) and Western blot analysis showed that the inhibition of SGK1 decreased Orai1 protein expression during osteoclastogenesis (Fig. 3A, C and D). Ca2+ imaging analysis confirmed essentially complete inhibition of SOCE in BMMs treated with GSK650394 compared with control (Fig. 3E). We therefore speculated that Orai1 might mediate the effect of SGK1 on osteoclast. To elucidate the role of Orai1 in the SGK1-mediated inhibition of osteoclast formation, we overexpressed Orai1 in BMMs (Fig. 3B). Scrambled or Orai1 overexpressed BMMs were treated with or without GSK650394 in the presence of RANKL (75 ng/mL) for 5 days, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3F and G, the inhibitory effects of GSK650394 on osteoclast differentiation were markedly alleviated in Orai1 overexpression group, indicating that Orai1 is a key downstream mediator of the terminal differentiation of osteoclasts by SGK1 (Supplementary Fig. S2C).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Orai1 is upregulated during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and can be suppressed by GSK650394. A, BMMs treated with or without GSK650394 (2 μmol/L) were cultured in the presence of M-CSF (30 ng/mL) and RANKL (100 ng/mL) and collected at the indicated time points for the analysis of Orai1 protein expression. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. B, SGK1 protein expression in BMMs was assessed by Western blotting. ACTB was used as a loading control. Immunoblots were quantified using ImageJ software. Experiments were performed in triplicate. C, IF of Orai1 protein levels in BMMs from the control, RANKL-treated and RANKL/GSK650394 cotreated groups. Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope. Red, SGK1; blue, nuclei. D, Orai1 protein on the membrane was analyzed flow cytometry. GSK650394 at the concentrations of 2 μmol/L was used. E, Ca2+ imaging of RANKL induced BMMs treated with or without GSK650394. Cells were loaded with 5 μmol/L Fluo-3/AM, and SOCE was revealed by readdition of 2 mmol/L Ca2+ after TG-induced Ca2+ release from ER and measured by Multi-Mode Microplate Reader of intracellular Ca2+ concentration. F, Control or Orai1-overexpressed BMMs induced by RANKL (50 ng/mL) treated with or without GSK650394 (2 μmol/L) for 5 days. Then, cells were fixed for TRAP staining. G, TRAP-positive cells with ≥3 nuclei were counted. Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001 (Tukey test).

GSK650394 prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss

To investigate the effects of SGK1 on bone loss, we analyzed the bone mass of femurs in ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model. The result revealed that the reduction of intrabecular bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and trabecular number (Tb.N) in the OVX mice was dramatically relieved by GSK650394 treatment (50 mg/kg; Fig. 4A and B). Furthermore, we performed TRAP staining in femoral sections. The number and size of osteoclasts in OVX mice were significantly higher than those in sham-operated mice. In response to GSK650394 treatment, the OVX mice demonstrated dramatically reduced ovariectomy-induced osteoclast activity (Fig. 4C). Histomorphometric analyses confirmed that the osteoclast surface/bone surface (Oc.S/BS) ratio was strikingly higher in OVX mice than in sham-operated mice (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, compared with those of untreated OVX mice, these osteoclastic parameters were significantly decreased in GSK650394-treated OVX mice (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

GSK650394 inhibits ovariectomy-induced bone loss. A, Representative micro-CT images near the distal femoral of mice from the sham-operated (SHAM), ovariectomized (OVX), and OVX + GSK650394-treated groups. Mice were sacrificed after 8 weeks of GSK650394 treatment. B, Histograms represent the parameters of the distal femur: Trabecular bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular number (Tb.N), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th). Data represent the means ± SDs, n = 6. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (Tukey test). C, TRAP staining was performed in sections of the metaphyseal regions of distal femurs from SHAM, OVX, and OVX+GSK650394 groups. D, Osteoclast surface/bone surface (Oc.S/BS, %) of TRAP-stained sections was measured. Data are presented as the means ± SDs, n = 6. **, P < 0.01 (Tukey test). E, Mice were sacrificed after 8 weeks of GSK650394 treatment. Serum levels of CTX-I, RANKL, and OPG were measured by ELISA. Data are presented as the means ± SDs, n = 6. Statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups are indicated as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 (Tukey test).

In addition, compared with OVX group GSK650394 treatment significantly suppress the ovariectomy-induced elevation in type I collagen cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (CTX-I) and RANKL levels in serum (Fig. 4E). Moreover, we tested the levels of OPG by ELISA. The results are similar (Fig. 4E). Therefore, compared with that in the untreated OVX mice, the RANKL/OPG ratio was markedly suppressed in the GSK650394-treated OVX mice (Fig. 4E).

SGK1 serves as a promising therapeutic target for bone metastasis

To further verify the effect of GSK650394 on the formation of bone metastases, we used a model based on the intracardiac inoculation of tumor cells (32). A bone-seeking clone (MBS4-TJGK) of the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was established by repeated sequential intracardiac inoculation of the cells into nude mice and further culture of metastatic cells obtained from bone metastases in vitro. After four cycles, MBS4-TJGK metastasize exclusively to bones. Then, MBS4-TJGK cells were inoculated intracardially. Nude mice were intraperitoneally injected with GSK650394 (50 mg/kg, five times per week) for 4 weeks. Bioluminescence imaging showed that compared with the DMSO-treated group, hind limb and spine tumor burden in mice was significantly decreased in the GSK650394-treated group (Fig. 5A and B). Micro-CT imaging confirmed that the mice treated with GSK650394 exhibited a reduction in bone lesions (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

GSK650394 prevents bone metastasis in an intracardiac inoculation model. A, Representative images of whole-body in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of mice at day 30 after the intracardiac injection of MBS-TJGK4 cells. B, Quantitation of bioluminescence images at day 30 (n = 6). Statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups are indicated as ***P < 0.0003 (Student t test). C, Representative micro-CT images of tibia from the DMSO- and GSK650394-treated groups. D, The myocardial cells injury after intraperitoneal injection of DMSO, GSK650394 (50 mg/kg), or GSK650394 (75 mg/kg) were determined by blood chemistry tests. LDH1, lactic dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1; LDH-L, lactic dehydrogenase; CK-MB, creatine kinase-MB. *, P < 0.05 (Dunnett t test) versus the vehicle-treated group. E, The hepatic and renal function of mice after intraperitoneal injection of DMSO, GSK650394 (50 mg/kg), or GSK650394 (75 mg/kg) were determined by blood chemistry tests. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CR, creatinine. F, Apoptosis was analyzed using an Annexin V/PI Staining Kit. GSK650394 concentrations of 1, 2, and 5 μmol/L were used. G, MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with varying concentrations of GSK650394 (0, 1, 2, and 5 μmol/L) for 5 days. Cell proliferation was assessed by the Cell Counting Kit-8. Data are presented as the means ± SDs of three independent experiments.

Because SGK1 is also highly expressed in heart and gastrointestinal tract, we then evaluate the toxicity of GSK650394. Mice were euthanized 3 weeks after injection and plasma biochemistry analyses were performed. The indicators for heart and liver injuries, as well as kidney functions did not change significantly at the concentration of 50 mg/kg (Fig. 5D and E). However, when lifted dose to 75 mg/kg, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH-L) dropped in treated group mice (Fig. 5D). These results suggest that intraperitoneal injection of GSK650394 in our model did not lead to reductions in hepatic and renal function but may have off-target influence on myocardial cells damaging with high dose.

Then, direct effect of GSK650394 treatment on MDA-MB-231 cell lines was tested by flow cytometry and CCK-8 (Fig. 5F and G). Apoptotic and necrosis cells were detected using FITC-Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI). Cells incubated with GSK650394 at the concentration of 5 μmol/L showed higher apoptotic rate among other groups. The proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells were altered by GSK650394 in a dose-dependent manner.

Validation of the role of SGK1 from database

Comparing the mRNA expression level of SGK1 in normal breast tissues and breast cancer tissues (Fig. 6A), we found SGK1 is significantly increased in breast cancer (33, 34, Perou and colleagues). It validated our results of RT-PCR. To further determine the clinical significance of SGK1, we examined whether SGK1 expression was associated with the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients (Fig. 6B). The survival analysis based on large population included in the KM plotter showed no significant prognostic performance of SGK1 on breast cancer patients (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82–1.02; P = 0.120). But in other datasets GSE2603 (HR = 2.24; 95% CI, 1.05–4.79; P = 0.033) and GSE12276 (HR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30–2.34; P < 0.001) we found high expression of SGK1 could predict poor prognosis, indicating the potential oncogenic effect of SGK1 (35, 36).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Validation of SGK1 from database. A, SGK1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in breast malignancy tissues (IDBC, LBC) compared with normal breast tissues based on the Oncomine database. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (Dunnett t test) versus normal group. B, Overall survival curves of SGK1 according to its expression based on Kaplan–Meier plotter and datasets GSE2603 and GSE12276 from the GEO database.

Discussion

Ca2+ signaling is essential for diverse biological processes and is known to be involved in osteoclast formation and function (37–43). Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and Ca2+ entry across the cell membrane both accomplish Ca2+ in cytoplasm. SOCE, a major Ca2+ influx pathway in most nonexcitable cell types, is mediated by the Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel, which consist of Orai1, 2, or 3 binding to their regulators STIM 1 or 2 (31). Previous work has identified SGK1 as a powerful stimulator of several ion channels including Orai1. Some clinical studies have been undertaken to corroborate the relevance of SGK1 in diseases such as hypertension and cancer. The mechanism can be related to coordinate with different signaling pathways include FoxO1 and NF-κB and lead to target organ inflammation (44). However, it was unknown whether SGK1 affects osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption via Ca2+ channel through Orai1 until now.

In our study, we observed SGK1 expression was upregulated upon the initiation of osteoclastogenesis. Both pharmacologic inhibition and knockdown of SGK1 by shRNA suppressed osteoclast differentiation and function. In addition, Orai1 protein abundance appeared as well as the significant decrease of Ca2+ influx after GSK650394 treatment (Fig. 3A, C–E). Moreover, overexpressing Orai1 in BMMs counteracted the suppressive effect of GSK650394 on osteoclast formation. On the basis of these data, we concluded that SGK1 expression is closely related to osteoclastogenesis and has a strong effect on Orai1. To further confirm SGK1 inhibition on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in vivo, we used GSK650394 to prevent bone loss in OVX mouse model. We observed attenuated ovariectomy-induced bone loss in GSK650394 treated group, which was consistent with results in vitro. In the previous work, SGK1 was showed to be evolved in nuclear translocation and activation of NF-κB (24, 45, 46). SGK1 could phosphorylate IKKα, which lead to IKKβ activation. The IKK complex and the NF-κB pathway would be activated similarly, which were confirmed in our study. In addition, we demonstrated that Orai1established an previously unknown link between SGK1 and osteoclast genesis.

SGK1 expressed heavily in several tumor cells, including colon cancer, myeloma, medulloblastoma, prostate cancer, and ovarian tumors (47, 48). Some research has shown that SGK1 contributes to the glucocorticoid-induced resistance of breast cancer cells to chemotherapy, and SGK1 silencing could increase the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. On the basis of the Oncomine database, we found the expression of SGK1 was significantly upregulated in different types of breast cancer compared with normal breast tissue. However, the result of further survival analysis in breast cancer varies from different database. To investigate the exact role of SGK1 in prognosis of breast cancer, further research should be conducted in specific population cohort with confounding factors adjusted.

SGK1-dependent regulation of Orai1 has been shown to play a critical role in regulation of cell proliferation (17). In this study, we investigated the effect of SGK1 on bone metastasis in breast cancer using an intracardiac injection-induced model of bone metastasis in mice. Our results demonstrated the effects of GSK650394 in the inhibition of breast cancer bone metastasis. Besides the effects on the cell proliferation, more application of SGK1 inhibition has been explored.

On the basis of this study, SGK1 is a powerful regulator in osteoclastogenesis and bone metastasis. SGK1 inhibitors might be a promising therapeutic approach target for various pathologic conditions including bone metastasis. Because we are just exploring the effect of SGK1 on osteoclastogenesis, the possible osteoblastic effect also needs to be considered. Previous study has confirmed that SGK1 could mediate osteoinductive effects of phosphate in the vascular tissue and trigger vascular calcification. SGK1 leads to IκBα phosphorylation and NF-κB activation, which results in osteo-/chondrogenic transdifferentiation of VSMCs. Further study needs to be done in the future (49–51).

There are several limitations to our study. Because SOCE is not the only calcium entry pathway, the calcium influx could be through t-type calcium channel, TRP channels, and so on. We used a selective SOCE-specific inhibitor BTP2 and monitored calcium influx after intracellular store depletion (52). The drug abolished the Ca2+ transient amplitude but cannot be fully rescued by Orai1 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Also, upregulation of Orai1 is not the only way SGK1 modify Ca2+ activity. SGK1 can also have effects on activation of K+ channel or Ca2+-permeable TRP channels which could hyperpolarize the cell membrane and influence the Ca2+ channels. Our results only focused on Orai1, not on the whole family of Orai. It is also possible that different levels of other isoforms, Orai2 and Orai3, are present in the cells in both groups (53, 54). It highlights the need for future deeper studies to analyze the differences and connections among the three. Another limitation is that the effects of the inhibitor is not specific for bone metastasis, but also impair the survival of tumor cells. Although in our experiment, GSK650394 did not show a direct effect on breast cancer apoptosis (Fig 5F), high levels of SGK1 have been found as compensation upon PI3K or AKT pathway and contribute to the resistance to AKT inhibitors in breast cancer cells, whereas loss of SGK1 profoundly impacts thyroid cancer cell proliferation and survival despite intact PI3K and AKT activity (50, 55, 56). Therefore, the effect of GSK650394 to bone metastasis may be composed of complex factors.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: Z. Zhang, C. Song, H. Guan, F. Li

Development of methodology: Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, B. Mi, H. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Sun, H. Guan, F. Li

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, B. Mi, H. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Sun, F. Li

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, C. Song, J. Wang, Z. Lei, H. Guan, F. Li

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, H. Zhang, H. Guan, F. Li

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): Z. Zhang, Q. Xu, B. Mi, H. Kang, J. Wang, Z. Lei, F. Li

Study supervision: H. Guan, F. Li

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81572857, to H. Guan; no. 81401762, to J. Wang; and 81472133 to F. Li)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Mol Cancer Ther 2020;19:650–60

  • Received July 16, 2018.
  • Revision received December 30, 2018.
  • Accepted October 31, 2019.
  • Published first November 6, 2019.
  • ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mundy GR
    . Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:584–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Weilbaecher KN,
    2. Guise TA,
    3. McCauley LK
    . Cancer to bone: a fatal attraction. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:411–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Roodman GD
    . Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1655–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gdowski AS,
    2. Ranjan A,
    3. Vishwanatha JK
    . Current concepts in bone metastasis, contemporary therapeutic strategies and ongoing clinical trials. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2017;36:108.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Zhao YP,
    2. Ye WL,
    3. Liu DZ,
    4. Cui H,
    5. Cheng Y,
    6. Liu M,
    7. et al.
    Redox and pH dual sensitive bone targeting nanoparticles to treat breast cancer bone metastases and inhibit bone resorption. Nanoscale 2017;9:6264–77.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fizazi K,
    2. Lipton A,
    3. Mariette X,
    4. Body JJ,
    5. Rahim Y,
    6. Gralow JR,
    7. et al.
    Randomized phase II trial of denosumab in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer, breast cancer, or other neoplasms after intravenous bisphosphonates. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1564–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mochizuki T,
    2. Yano K,
    3. Ikari K,
    4. Kawakami K,
    5. Hiroshima R,
    6. Koenuma N,
    7. et al.
    Effects of denosumab treatment on bone mineral density and joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Miner Metab 2018;36:431–8.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Nakashima T,
    2. Hayashi M,
    3. Fukunaga T,
    4. Kurata K,
    5. Oh-Hora M,
    6. Feng JQ,
    7. et al.
    Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med 2011;17:1231–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sigl V,
    2. Penninger JM
    . RANKL/RANK - from bone physiology to breast cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2014;25:205–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Karsenty G,
    2. Kronenberg HM,
    3. Settembre C
    . Genetic control of bone formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009;25:629–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Luo J,
    2. Yang Z,
    3. Ma Y,
    4. Yue Z,
    5. Lin H,
    6. Qu G,
    7. et al.
    LGR4 is a receptor for RANKL and negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Nat Med 2016;22:539–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kim H,
    2. Choi HK,
    3. Shin JH,
    4. Kim KH,
    5. Huh JY,
    6. Lee SA,
    7. et al.
    Selective inhibition of RANK blocks osteoclast maturation and function and prevents bone loss in mice. J Clin Invest 2009;119:813–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Greenblatt MB,
    2. Shim JH,
    3. Glimcher LH
    . Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in osteoblasts. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2013;29:63–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Guan H,
    2. Mi B,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Wu W,
    5. Tan P,
    6. Fang Z,
    7. et al.
    Decitabine represses osteoclastogenesis through inhibition of RANK and NF-kappaB. Cell Signal 2015;27:969–77.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Guan H,
    3. Li J,
    4. Fang Z,
    5. Chen W,
    6. Li F
    . Amlexanox suppresses osteoclastogenesis and prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Sci Rep 2015;5:13575.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Hwang SY,
    2. Putney JW
    . Orai1-mediated calcium entry plays a critical role in osteoclast differentiation and function by regulating activation of the transcription factor NFATc1. FASEB J 2012;26:1484–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Eylenstein A,
    2. Gehring EM,
    3. Heise N,
    4. Shumilina E,
    5. Schmidt S,
    6. Szteyn K,
    7. et al.
    Stimulation of Ca2+-channel Orai1/STIM1 by serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1). FASEB J 2011;25:2012–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Arai F,
    2. Miyamoto T,
    3. Ohneda O,
    4. Inada T,
    5. Sudo T,
    6. Brasel K,
    7. et al.
    Commitment and differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells by the sequential expression of c-Fms and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB (RANK) receptors. J Exp Med 1999;190:1741–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Di Cristofano A
    . SGK1: the dark side of PI3K signaling. Curr Top Dev Biol 2017;123:49–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Andersen MN,
    2. Krzystanek K,
    3. Petersen F,
    4. Bomholtz SH,
    5. Olesen SP,
    6. Abriel H,
    7. et al.
    A phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) pathway promotes Kv7.1 channel surface expression by inhibiting Nedd4–2 protein. J Biol Chem 2013;288:36841–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Hall BA,
    2. Kim TY,
    3. Skor MN,
    4. Conzen SD
    . Serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) activation in breast cancer: requirement for mTORC1 activity associates with ER-alpha expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;135:469–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lou Y,
    2. Hu M,
    3. Mao L,
    4. Zheng Y,
    5. Jin F
    . Involvement of serum glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 in reproductive success. FASEB J 2017;31:447–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lang F,
    2. Shumilina E
    . Regulation of ion channels by the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase SGK1. FASEB J 2013;27:3–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tai DJ,
    2. Su CC,
    3. Ma YL,
    4. Lee EH
    . SGK1 phosphorylation of IkappaB Kinase alpha and p300 Up-regulates NF-kappaB activity and increases N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor NR2A and NR2B expression. J Biol Chem 2009;284:4073–89.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Di Pietro N,
    2. Panel V,
    3. Hayes S,
    4. Bagattin A,
    5. Meruvu S,
    6. Pandolfi A,
    7. et al.
    Serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) regulates adipocyte differentiation via forkhead box O1. Mol Endocrinol 2010;24:370–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Borst O,
    2. Schmidt EM,
    3. Munzer P,
    4. Schonberger T,
    5. Towhid ST,
    6. Elvers M,
    7. et al.
    The serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) influences platelet calcium signaling and function by regulation of Orai1 expression in megakaryocytes. Blood 2012;119:251–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Dong Y,
    2. Song C,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Lei Z,
    5. Xu F,
    6. Guan H,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of PRMT5 suppresses osteoclast differentiation and partially protects against ovariectomy-induced bone loss through downregulation of CXCL10 and RSAD2. Cell Signal 2017;34:55–65.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gyorffy B,
    2. Lanczky A,
    3. Eklund AC,
    4. Denkert C,
    5. Budczies J,
    6. Li Q,
    7. et al.
    An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123:725–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hammond M,
    2. Washburn DG,
    3. Hoang HT,
    4. Manns S,
    5. Frazee JS,
    6. Nakamura H,
    7. et al.
    Design and synthesis of orally bioavailable serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2009;19:4441–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Asagiri M,
    2. Takayanagi H
    . The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone 2007;40:251–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hwang SY,
    2. Foley J,
    3. Numaga-Tomita T,
    4. Petranka JG,
    5. Bird GS,
    6. Putney JW Jr..
    Deletion of Orai1 alters expression of multiple genes during osteoclast and osteoblast maturation. Cell Calcium 2012;52:488–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Campbell JP,
    2. Merkel AR,
    3. Masood-Campbell SK,
    4. Elefteriou F,
    5. Sterling JA
    . Models of bone metastasis. J Vis Exp 2012;e4260.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Karnoub AE,
    2. Dash AB,
    3. Vo AP,
    4. Sullivan A,
    5. Brooks MW,
    6. Bell GW,
    7. et al.
    Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature 2007;449:557–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Zhao H,
    2. Langerod A,
    3. Ji Y,
    4. Nowels KW,
    5. Nesland JM,
    6. Tibshirani R,
    7. et al.
    Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. Mol Biol Cell 2004;15:2523–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Minn AJ,
    2. Gupta GP,
    3. Siegel PM,
    4. Bos PD,
    5. Shu W,
    6. Giri DD,
    7. et al.
    Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature 2005;436:518–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Bos PD,
    2. Zhang XH,
    3. Nadal C,
    4. Shu W,
    5. Gomis RR,
    6. Nguyen DX,
    7. et al.
    Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature 2009;459:1005–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Pearce LR,
    2. Sommer EM,
    3. Sakamoto K,
    4. Wullschleger S,
    5. Alessi DR
    . Protor-1 is required for efficient mTORC2-mediated activation of SGK1 in the kidney. Biochem J 2011;436:169–79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Dynes JL,
    2. Amcheslavsky A,
    3. Cahalan MD
    . Genetically targeted single-channel optical recording reveals multiple Orai1 gating states and oscillations in calcium influx. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;113:440–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Parekh AB
    . Decoding cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations. Trends Biochem Sci 2011;36:78–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hewavitharana T,
    2. Deng X,
    3. Soboloff J,
    4. Gill DL
    . Role of STIM and Orai proteins in the store-operated calcium signaling pathway. Cell Calcium 2007;42:173–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Lewis TL,
    3. Robinson LJ,
    4. Brundage KM,
    5. Schafer R,
    6. Martin KH,
    7. et al.
    The role of calcium release activated calcium channels in osteoclast differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2011;226:1082–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Maus M,
    2. Cuk M,
    3. Patel B,
    4. Lian J,
    5. Ouimet M,
    6. Kaufmann U,
    7. et al.
    Store-operated Ca2+ entry controls induction of lipolysis and the transcriptional reprogramming to lipid metabolism. Cell Metab 2017;25:698–712.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Kuroda Y,
    2. Hisatsune C,
    3. Nakamura T,
    4. Matsuo K,
    5. Mikoshiba K
    . Osteoblasts induce Ca2+ oscillation-independent NFATc1 activation during osteoclastogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:8643–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Du YN,
    2. Tang XF,
    3. Xu L,
    4. Chen WD,
    5. Gao PJ,
    6. Han WQ
    . SGK1-FoxO1 signaling pathway mediates Th17/Treg imbalance and target organ inflammation in angiotensin II-Induced hypertension. Front Physiol 2018;9:1581.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. BelAiba RS,
    2. Djordjevic T,
    3. Bonello S,
    4. Artunc F,
    5. Lang F,
    6. Hess J,
    7. et al.
    The serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase Sgk-1 is involved in pulmonary vascular remodeling: role in redox-sensitive regulation of tissue factor by thrombin. Circ Res 2006;98:828–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Vallon V,
    2. Wyatt AW,
    3. Klingel K,
    4. Huang DY,
    5. Hussain A,
    6. Berchtold S,
    7. et al.
    SGK1-dependent cardiac CTGF formation and fibrosis following DOCA treatment. J Mol Med 2006;84:396–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Lang F,
    2. Perrotti N,
    3. Stournaras C
    . Colorectal carcinoma cells–regulation of survival and growth by SGK1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010;42:1571–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Fagerli UM,
    2. Ullrich K,
    3. Stuhmer T,
    4. Holien T,
    5. Kochert K,
    6. Holt RU,
    7. et al.
    Serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) is a prominent target gene of the transcriptional response to cytokines in multiple myeloma and supports the growth of myeloma cells. Oncogene 2011;30:3198–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Voelkl J,
    2. Tuffaha R,
    3. Luong TTD,
    4. Zickler D,
    5. Masyout J,
    6. Feger M,
    7. et al.
    Zinc inhibits phosphate-induced vascular calcification through TNFAIP3-mediated suppression of NF-kappaB. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018;29:1636–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sommer EM,
    2. Dry H,
    3. Cross D,
    4. Guichard S,
    5. Davies BR,
    6. Alessi DR
    . Elevated SGK1 predicts resistance of breast cancer cells to Akt inhibitors. Biochem J 2013;452:499–508.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Voelkl J,
    2. Luong TT,
    3. Tuffaha R,
    4. Musculus K,
    5. Auer T,
    6. Lian X,
    7. et al.
    SGK1 induces vascular smooth muscle cell calcification through NF-kappaB signaling. J Clin Invest 2018;128:3024–40.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Ishikawa J,
    2. Ohga K,
    3. Yoshino T,
    4. Takezawa R,
    5. Ichikawa A,
    6. Kubota H,
    7. et al.
    A pyrazole derivative, YM-58483: potently inhibits store-operated sustained Ca2+ influx and IL-2 production in T lymphocytes. J Immunol 2003;170:4441–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Feske S,
    2. Gwack Y,
    3. Prakriya M,
    4. Srikanth S,
    5. Puppel SH,
    6. Tanasa B,
    7. et al.
    A mutation in Orai1 causes immune deficiency by abrogating CRAC channel function. Nature 2006;441:179–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Zhang SL,
    2. Yeromin AV,
    3. Zhang XH,
    4. Yu Y,
    5. Safrina O,
    6. Penna A,
    7. et al.
    Genome-wide RNAi screen of Ca(2+) influx identifies genes that regulate Ca(2+) release-activated Ca(2+) channel activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:9357–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Castel P,
    2. Ellis H,
    3. Bago R,
    4. Toska E,
    5. Razavi P,
    6. Carmona FJ,
    7. et al.
    PDK1-SGK1 signaling sustains AKT-Independent mTORC1 activation and confers resistance to PI3Kalpha inhibition. Cancer Cell 2016;30:229–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Orlacchio A,
    2. Ranieri M,
    3. Brave M,
    4. Arciuch VA,
    5. Forde T,
    6. De Martino D,
    7. et al.
    SGK1 is a critical component of an AKT-independent pathway essential for PI3K-mediated tumor development and maintenance. Cancer Res 2017;77:6914–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 19 (2)
February 2020
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Serum- and Glucocorticoid-inducible Kinase 1 is Essential for Osteoclastogenesis and Promotes Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Serum- and Glucocorticoid-inducible Kinase 1 is Essential for Osteoclastogenesis and Promotes Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis
Zheng Zhang, Qian Xu, Chao Song, Baoguo Mi, Honghua Zhang, Honglei Kang, Huiyong Liu, Yunlong Sun, Jia Wang, Zhuowei Lei, Hanfeng Guan and Feng Li
Mol Cancer Ther February 1 2020 (19) (2) 650-660; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0783

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Serum- and Glucocorticoid-inducible Kinase 1 is Essential for Osteoclastogenesis and Promotes Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis
Zheng Zhang, Qian Xu, Chao Song, Baoguo Mi, Honghua Zhang, Honglei Kang, Huiyong Liu, Yunlong Sun, Jia Wang, Zhuowei Lei, Hanfeng Guan and Feng Li
Mol Cancer Ther February 1 2020 (19) (2) 650-660; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0783
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Galunisertib and SBRT in Patients with Advanced HCC
  • CF33 Viroimmunotherapy Cross-Primes T Cells in Colon Cancer
  • Hsp90 Inhibition and PD-1 Blockade
Show more Cancer Biology and Translational Studies
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement