Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Small Molecule Therapeutics

Inhibition of EZH2 Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of Metformin in Prostate Cancer

Yifan Kong, Yanquan Zhang, Fengyi Mao, Zhuangzhuang Zhang, Zhiguo Li, Ruixin Wang, Jinghui Liu and Xiaoqi Liu
Yifan Kong
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
2Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yanquan Zhang
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fengyi Mao
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
2Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhuangzhuang Zhang
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiguo Li
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruixin Wang
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinghui Liu
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoqi Liu
1Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
3Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Xiaoqi.Liu@uky.edu
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0874 Published December 2020
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Metformin and GSK126 in combination synergistically inhibit growth of prostate cancer cells. A–C, LNCaP, 22Rv1, or RWPE1 cells were plated into 6-well plates and treated with metformin (0.5 mmol/L), GSK126 (2.5 μmol/L), or both for 12 days, followed by crystal violet staining to monitor colony formation. Data shown are representative of data from three repeats. The number of colonies was quantified by using ImageJ software (means ± SD; n = 3 independent experiments). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. D–F, LNCaP, 22Rv1, or RWPE1 cells were treated with DMSO, metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 72 hours, followed by MTT assay. The results represent the mean of three independent experiments. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. G and H, LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells were treated with DMSO, metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 48 hours, followed by immunoblotting against pro- and cleaved-PARP and caspases. I and J, Combination indices of metformin and GSK126 in 22Rv1 and LNCaP cells.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Metformin downregulates EZH2 expression by regulating miR-26a-5p. A and B, LNCaP or 22Rv1 cells were treated with DMSO, metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 48 hours, followed by immunoblotting (IB). C and D, LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells were treated with metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 48 hours, followed by qRT-PCR. E and F, LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells were transfected with EZH2 and pcDNA3.0, followed by 72-hour cell viability assay with indicated treatments (metformin: 1 mmol/L; GSK126: 5 μmol/L; means ± SD; n = 3). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. Meanwhile, some cells were harvested for Western blot to test EZH2 level after the treatments. G–I, qRT-PCR shows the expression of miR-26a-5p, miR-101-3p, let-7a-5p, let-7b-5p, and let-7c-5p of LNCaP cells treated with metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or combination for 48 hours, with all microRNA expressions being normalized to RNU6-2. J, LNCaP cells were transfected with the miR-26a-5p inhibitor or negative control miRNA inhibitor, then treated with metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 48 hours, followed by IB. K, LNCaP cells were transfected with the miR-101-3p inhibitor or the negative control miRNA inhibitor, then treated with metformin (1 mmol/L) for 48 hours and harvested for IB. L, LNCaP cells were transfected with inhibitors targeting let-7a-5p, let-7b-5p, and let-7c-5p or the negative control miRNA inhibitor, then treated with metformin (1 mmol/L) for 48 hours and harvested for IB. M, qRT-PCR shows the expression of miR-26a-5p or 22Rv1 cells treated with metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L) or both for 48 hours, with miR-26a-5p expression being normalized to RNU6-2. N, 22Rv1 cells were transfected with miR-26a-5p inhibitor or negative control miRNA inhibitor, then treated with metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 48 hours and harvested for IB. O, 22Rv1 cells were transfected with miR-26a-5p inhibitor or negative control miRNA inhibitor, treated with DMSO or the combination of metformin (1 mmol/L) and GSK126 (5 μmol/L) for 72 hours, followed by MTT assay (means ± SD; n = 3). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    AR affects prostate cancer cells' response to metformin. A–D, PC3, DU145, LNCaP, and 22Rv1 cells were treated with metformin of indicated concentrations for 48 hours and harvested for immunoblotting (IB). E and F, LNCaP cells were treated with 10 nmol/L R1881 or metformin or metformin plus R1881 for 48 hours, followed by IB. Meanwhile, mRNA was extracted for the detection of levels of miR-26a-5p. G, PC3 (-AR or -Neo) cells were treated with metformin of indicated concentrations, as well as 10 nmol/L R1881 to activate AR, and subjected to IB. H, mRNA was extracted from PC3-Neo and PC3-AR cells treated with 1 mmol/L metformin for 48 hours, followed by qRT-PCR to test the levels of miR-26a-5p. I and J, 22Rv1 cells were stably transfected with sh-control, sh-AR #3, and sh-AR #4, and treated with 1 mmol/L metformin for 48 hours, followed by IB to test EZH2 protein level and qRT-PCR to detect miR-26a-5p level.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    MiR-26a-5p is directly regulated by AR. A, Scheme representing the binding sequences within the miR-26a promoter relative to the designed primers. B, ChIP analysis of AR binding to the miR-26a promoter region in 22Rv1 and LNCaP cells. C and D, HEK293T cells and PC3-Neo or PC3-AR cells were cotransfected with the miR-26a promoter construct with empty vector or AR for 24 hours, treated with R1881 (10 nmol/L) for additional 24 hours, and harvested for luciferase assays. Values are means ± SD; n = 3. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. E and F, 22Rv1 cells were treated with DMSO, metformin (1 mmol/L), GSK126 (5 μmol/L), or both for 48 hours and harvested for anti-AR ChIP using qPCR to measure the binding of AR to the promoter of miR-26a. Values are means ± standard deviations; n = 3. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. G, HEK293T cells were transfected with the miR-26a promoter construct in the presence of AR, EZH2-S21D, or EZH2-S21A, and harvested for luciferase assays. Values are means ± SD; n = 3. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. H and I, Chromatin was precipitated with anti-AR antibody and re-precipitated with anti-AR or anti-EZH2 antibody or IgG, followed by qPCR. Values are means ± SD; n = 3. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. NS, not significant.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The combination of metformin and GSK126 reduced cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and inhibited EZH2 expression in 22Rv1-derived xenograft tumors. A, Tumor growth curves of 22Rv1-derived mouse xenografts. After nude mice were inoculated with 22Rv1 cells (2.5 × 105/mouse) for 2 weeks, the mice bearing tumors were treated with drugs as described in Materials and Methods. The sizes of the tumors in each group were measured every 4 days (mean ± SD; n = 9 mice for each group). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. B, Images of the 22Rv1-derived xenograft tumors at the end of study. C, Measurement of tumor weight upon harvest. D, Measurement of mice body weight upon tumor harvest. E, Representative images of H&E staining on formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 22Rv1-derived tumor sections. F, Representative images of anti-Ki67 IHC staining of tumor sections. G, Quantification of Ki67 signals as percentages of Ki67-positive cells compared with the total numbers of cells. Multiple tumor sections were calculated (means ± standard deviations; n = 4). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. H, Representative images of anti-cleaved caspase-3 IHC staining of tumor sections. I, Quantification of cleaved caspase-3 signals as percentages of cleaved caspase-3–positive cells compared with the total numbers of cells. Multiple tumor sections were calculated (means ± SD; n = 4). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. J and K, Protein lysates extracted from 22Rv1-derived tumors were subjected to Western blot for EZH2 and H3K23me3, as well as H3 and β-actin expression. L, Quantification of EZH2 protein levels in J and K.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    The combination of metformin and GSK126 reduced cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and inhibited EZH2 expression in LuCaP35CR xenograft tumors. A, Tumor growth curves of LuCaP35CR xenografts (mean ± SD; n = 4 mice for each group). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. B, Images of the LuCaP35CR xenograft tumors at the end of study. C, Measurement of tumor weight upon harvest. D, Blood was collected immediately when the mice were sacrificed, and a PSA enzyme–linked immunosorbent assay kit was used to measure the serum PSA levels. E, Representative images of H&E staining on formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded, LuCaP35CR tumor sections. F, Representative images of anti-Ki67 IHC staining of tumor sections. G, Quantification of Ki67 signals as percentages of Ki67-positive cells compared with the total numbers of cells. Multiple tumor sections were calculated (means ± SD; n = 4). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. H, Representative images of anti-cleaved caspase-3 IHC staining of tumor sections. I, Quantification of cleaved caspase-3 signals as percentages of cleaved caspase-3–positive cells compared with the total number of cells. Multiple tumor sections were calculated (means ± SD; n = 4). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. J and K, Protein lysates extracted from LuCaP35CR tumors were subjected to EZH2 Western blotting. L, Quantification of EZH2 protein levels in J and K. M, Proposed working model based on the results of this study.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Figure S1 - Apoptosis of LNCaP and 22Rv1 in response to the treatments
    • Figure S2 - AR expressions in various cell lines & combinational effects on PC3 and DU145
    • Figure S3 - Combination of GSK126 and low-concentration metformin
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 19 (12)
December 2020
Volume 19, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibition of EZH2 Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of Metformin in Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inhibition of EZH2 Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of Metformin in Prostate Cancer
Yifan Kong, Yanquan Zhang, Fengyi Mao, Zhuangzhuang Zhang, Zhiguo Li, Ruixin Wang, Jinghui Liu and Xiaoqi Liu
Mol Cancer Ther December 1 2020 (19) (12) 2490-2501; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0874

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inhibition of EZH2 Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of Metformin in Prostate Cancer
Yifan Kong, Yanquan Zhang, Fengyi Mao, Zhuangzhuang Zhang, Zhiguo Li, Ruixin Wang, Jinghui Liu and Xiaoqi Liu
Mol Cancer Ther December 1 2020 (19) (12) 2490-2501; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0874
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Rigosertib in Rhabdomyosarcoma and Neuroblastoma
  • Combination of AZD0364 and Selumetinib in KRAS-Mutant NSCLC
  • eFT226, a Selective Inhibitor of eIF4A-Mediated Translation
Show more Small Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement