Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Small Molecule Therapeutics

Inhibition of Autotaxin with GLPG1690 Increases the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer

Xiaoyun Tang, Melinda Wuest, Matthew G.K. Benesch, Jennifer Dufour, YuanYuan Zhao, Jonathan M. Curtis, Alain Monjardet, Bertrand Heckmann, David Murray, Frank Wuest and David N. Brindley
Xiaoyun Tang
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
2Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melinda Wuest
2Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
3Division of Oncologic Imaging, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew G.K. Benesch
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
2Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
4Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew G.K. Benesch
Jennifer Dufour
3Division of Oncologic Imaging, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YuanYuan Zhao
5Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan M. Curtis
5Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan M. Curtis
Alain Monjardet
6Galapagos RMV, Parc Biocitech, Romainville, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bertrand Heckmann
6Galapagos RMV, Parc Biocitech, Romainville, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Murray
2Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
7Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Wuest
2Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
3Division of Oncologic Imaging, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David N. Brindley
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
2Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.brindley@ualberta.ca
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0386 Published January 2020
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    GLPG1690 inhibited ATX activity and decreased LPA concentration in plasma. A, The structure of GLPG1690. B, Mice were treated for 5 days with a daily dose of 50 mg/kg or with 100 mg/kg GLPG1690 every 12 hours. The time point at 0 hour was obtained from mice that were treated with the vehicle for 5 days. Blood was collected by a terminal cardiac puncture at the times indicated from the first dose of GLPG1690 on day 5. For the 24-hour time point for the mice treated with 100 mg/kg GLPG1690, the second dose was given at 12 hours. C, Plasma concentrations of GLPG1690 from the mice treated with 100 mg/kg GLPG1690. The second curve, which is indicated, is the profile expected from repeating the dose at 12 hours. D–J, Plasma concentrations of different molecular species of LPA and of S1P and sphinganine 1-phosphate from the mice treated with 100 mg/kg GLPG690. n = 5 mice for the control and 3 mice in each treated group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 compared with 0 hour for the lysophospholipids.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effects of RT and GLPG1690 on breast tumor growth. A, Illustration of experiment using RT and GLPG1690 in mouse 4T1 breast tumor model. B, RT with or without GLPG1690 (GLPG) significantly decreased tumor growth. C, RT with or without GLPG1690 (GLPG) significantly decreased tumor weight at day 19 after injection of cancer cells. D, RT significantly decreased the percentage of Ki67-positive cells in tumors at day 19, which was decreased further by combination with GLPG1690. n = 5 mice for control, n = 6 mice other groups. *, P < 0.05 compared with control.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effects of RT and GLPG1690 on [18F]FLT uptake by tumors. A and B, Representative static coronal [18F]FLT-PET images after 60 minutes postinjection during and after RT (7.5 Gy × 5 fractions). C and D, Quantitative [18F]FLT tumor uptake under the different experimental conditions as SUV from 5 or 6 mice in the control group and n = 6 mice in other groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Effects of RT and GLPG1690 on mRNA levels of LPPs, LPA receptors, and ATX in tumors. A–C, mRNA levels of LPP1, LPP2, and LPP3. D–G, mRNA levels of LPA1, LPA2, LPA3, and LPA6. H, mRNA level of ATX. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 for 5 control mice and 6 mice in experimental groups.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Effects of RT and GLPG1690 on Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 levels in tumors. A, RT with five daily fractions of 7.5 Gy or GLPG1690 treatment (100 mg/kg, every 12 hours) increased cleavage of caspase-3 and decreased Bcl-2 levels in tumors. B and C, Quantification of Western blotting for Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3. Samples from n = 5 control mice and n = 6 mice for other groups. *, P < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Effects of RT and GLPG1690 on levels of inflammatory cytokines in tumors and tumor-adjacent adipose. Protein levels of CCL11 (A) in tumors and protein levels of IL9 (B), IL12 p40 (C), IFNγ (D), and M-CSF (E) in tumor-adjacent adipose tissue (TA) with or without five daily fractions of 7.5 Gy X rays and/or GLPG1690 (100 mg/kg, every 12 hours). Samples from n = 5 control mice and n = 6 mice for other groups. *, P < 0.05.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    GLPG1690 increases the efficiency of doxorubicin in mouse model of breast cancer. A, Illustration of experiment using combination therapy with doxorubicin and GLPG1690 in mouse 4T1 breast tumor model. B and C, Doxorubicin (4 mg/kg, once every 2 days) in combination with GLPG1690 (100 mg/kg, every 12 hours) significantly decreased tumor growth and weight. D, Doxorubicin combined with GLPG1690 significantly decreased the percentage of Ki67-positive cells in tumors. E and F, Doxorubicin combined with GLPG1690 significantly increased 4-HNE-protein adducts in tumors. n = 6 mice from each group; *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01 compared with control.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Figure S1 - Body weight of mice A: Body weight of mice before and after treatment with GLPG1690 in combination with radiation. n = 5 to 6 mice per group. B: Body weight of mice before and after treatment with GLPG1690 in combination with doxorubicin. n = 6 mice per group.
    • Figure S2 - Immunohistochemistry images for Ki67. A: Ki67 staining in tumors treated with GLPG1690 in combination with RT. B: Ki67 staining in tumors treated with GLPG1690 in combination with doxorubicin. Scale bar = 100 mm.
    • Figure S3 - H&E and immunohistochemistry staining for ATX and Bcl-2 in mouse breast tumor tissue. The border between tumor (red T) and stromal tissue (red S) is showed as red dash line. Scale bar = 100 mm.
    • Figure S4 - Immunohistochemistry staining for ATX and Bcl-2 in mouse breast tumor and tumor-adjacent adipose. A: ATX staining in tumors. B: ATX staining in tumor-adjacent adipose. C: Bcl-2 staining in tumors. Scale bar = 100 mm.
    • Figure S5 - ATX activity in conditioned media of Hs578Bst stromal fibroblasts and patient-matching Hs578T breast cancer cells. Cells were exposed to different doses of g-radiation and ATX activity was measured 24 h after irradiation. n=3 to 5 for each condition. *P&lt;0.05 compared with Hs578T cells.
    • Figure S6 - Protein levels of cytokines in tumors with or without irradiation and/or GLPG1690. n = 5 in control, n = 6 in other groups. * P&lt;0.05, ** P&lt;0.01, ***P&lt;0.001.
    • Figure S7 - Protein levels of cytokines in tumor adjacent adipose tissue with or without irradiation and/or GLPG1690. n = 5 in control, n = 6 in other groups.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 19 (1)
January 2020
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibition of Autotaxin with GLPG1690 Increases the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inhibition of Autotaxin with GLPG1690 Increases the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer
Xiaoyun Tang, Melinda Wuest, Matthew G.K. Benesch, Jennifer Dufour, YuanYuan Zhao, Jonathan M. Curtis, Alain Monjardet, Bertrand Heckmann, David Murray, Frank Wuest and David N. Brindley
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2020 (19) (1) 63-74; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0386

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inhibition of Autotaxin with GLPG1690 Increases the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer
Xiaoyun Tang, Melinda Wuest, Matthew G.K. Benesch, Jennifer Dufour, YuanYuan Zhao, Jonathan M. Curtis, Alain Monjardet, Bertrand Heckmann, David Murray, Frank Wuest and David N. Brindley
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2020 (19) (1) 63-74; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0386
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • eFT226, a Selective Inhibitor of eIF4A-Mediated Translation
  • Peptide Inhibiting Breast Cancer by Disrupting SND1–MTDH
  • TTC-352 Pharmacology and Mechanisms to Treat Breast Cancer
Show more Small Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement