Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Large Molecule Therapeutics

Minicircle DNA-Engineered CAR T Cells Suppressed Tumor Growth in Mice

Jinsheng Han, Fei Gao, Songsong Geng, Xueshuai Ye, Tie Wang, Pingping Du, Ziqi Cai, Zexian Fu, Zhilong Zhao, Long Shi, Qingxia Li and Jianhui Cai
Jinsheng Han
1Department of Surgery, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fei Gao
1Department of Surgery, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
2Department of Surgery and Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Songsong Geng
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xueshuai Ye
1Department of Surgery, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tie Wang
4Department of Surgery, Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pingping Du
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ziqi Cai
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zexian Fu
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
5Department of Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhilong Zhao
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
6Department of Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Long Shi
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
7Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qingxia Li
2Department of Surgery and Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianhui Cai
1Department of Surgery, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
2Department of Surgery and Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
4Hebei Engineering Technology Research Center for Cell Therapy, Hebei HOFOY Biotech Company Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jianhuicai2001@163.com
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0204 Published January 2020
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Construction and confirmation of the mcDNA vector containing the PSCA-CAR construct. A, Illustrative representation of the PSCA-CAR construct. B, A cartoon showing the process to generate mcDNA-PSCA-CAR. The PSCA-CAR construct was cloned into MN511A-1 to form the parental plasmid pMC-Easy-PSCA-CAR (from left to middle). After L-arabinose induction, pMC-Easy-PSCA-CAR was separated into mcDNA-PSCA-CAR and the bacterial backbone which was eliminated by SceI endonuclease digestion (from middle to right). C, After the PSCA-CAR construct was cloned into the parental plasmid DNA (pMC-Easy-PSCA-CAR), eight bacterial clones (lanes 1–8) were selected for restriction and sequencing analysis. Nearly all clones contained the PSCA-CAR construct (1,575 bp) except clone 2 (lane 2). D, Electrophoresis for the uncut, closed circular plasmid and minicircle DNA before (−) and after (+) L-arabinose induction. After L-arabinose induction, a lower band representing the mcDNA-PSCA-CAR was generated without the presence of the parental plasmid DNA band. M, molecular weight marker.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Efficient transfection of mcDNA-PSCA-CAR into human T cells and high expression of PSCA-CAR on the cell surface. A, Human T cells were transfected with pmaxGFP (electroporation control plasmid from the 4D-Nucleofector X kit), mock mcDNA control plasmid MN601A-1 (SBI), and mcDNA-PSCA-CAR, respectively. All three types of plasmid contain a GFP cassette which can be observed under a fluorescent microscope. B, Twenty-four hours after electroporation, transfection efficiency, as represented by the green fluorescence intensity, was evaluated by FACS. CD3-PE was used to label the T cells. Nonelectroporated normal T cells were used as a control. The statistical analysis of cells from three donors is shown on the right. C, Six hours after electroporation, the viability of T cells was assessed by FACS. In apoptotic or dead T cells (black dots), forward and side scattering were changed due to altered cell volume and increased intracellular granularity, as compared with those in healthy T cells (green dots). Statistics of three donors is shown on the right. D, Eight days after electroporation, the expression of PSCA-CAR was examined by FACS. Cells were incubated with protein L and then stained with SA-PE. (d′) The statistical analysis of D from three donors. E, Proliferation curves of normal T, mock T, and PSCA-CAR T cells. The statistical analysis was performed on cells from three donors. F, Eight days after electroporation, FACS results showed similar CD3, CD4, and CD8 expression profiles on normal T and transfected PSCA-CAR T cells. Statistics of three donors is shown on the right. For FACS results in B, D, and F, both the X and Y axes are log10 scales (100, 101, 102, 103). For the FACS analysis in C, both the X and Y axes, representing forward scattered (FSC-A) and side scattered (SSC-A) light respectively, are in Cartesian coordinates ranging from 0 to 250 (×1,000). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA or Student t tests (ns, not significant; ****, P < 0.0001). Error bars represent SEM from triplicates.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    PSCA-CAR T cells specifically targeted PSCA-positive cells and demonstrated strong cytotoxicity in vitro. A, FACS analysis of the surface expression of PSCA on RT4 and PC-3M human cancer cell lines. X axis is in the log10 scale; Y axis is in Cartesian coordinates ranging from 0 to 1250. B, Histograms showing the PSCA-specific cytotoxicity against RT4 or PC-3M cells in elevating effector-to-target cell ratios (2:1, 5:1, 10:1, and 20:1, respectively). Cells were obtained from three donors, tested 8 days after electroporation, and statistically analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed by nonparametric tests (ns, not significant; ***, P < 0.001; and ****, P < 0.0001). C, ELISA analysis showed PSCA-targeted secretion of IFNγ and IL2 against RT4 or PC-3M cells (effector-to-target cell ratio, 10:1). Cells were obtained from three donors, tested 8 days after electroporation, and statistically analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests or ANOVA (ns, not significant and ****, P < 0.0001).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    In vivo systemic delivery of PSCA-CAR T cells suppressed tumor growth and demonstrated a persistent antitumor effect. A, PSCA expression levels in RT4- and PC-3M xenograft tumors. In each NOD/SCID immunodeficient mouse, 3 × 106 RT4 or PC-3M cells were injected. Fifteen days later, tumors were dissected and immunohistochemically analyzed using an anti-PSCA antibody. PSCA-positive staining showed a brownish color (magnification, 200×). B, Tumor size comparison. Tumor xenografts were excised 4 weeks after treatment with NS (no treatment control), normal T cells, or PSCA-CAR T cells. Three tumor samples were displayed for each treatment group. PSCA-CAR T cells were harvested 8 days after electroporation. C, Quantification of tumor volumes (mm3) in the three groups 4 weeks after the treatment. Nonparametric tests were used to compare the mean difference between each group at day 28 (****, P < 0.0001). D, FACS analysis revealed the presence of PSCA-CAR T cells in mouse peripheral blood 4 weeks after the treatment. Both the X and Y axes are log10 scales (100, 101, 102, 103). E, ELISA analysis of cytokine production (IFNγ and IL2) in mouse blood serum 4 weeks after the treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by nonparametric tests (****, P < 0.0001). F, IHC analysis of T-cell infiltration into the tumor xenografts. Four weeks after the treatment, tumor samples were excised from the mice, and divided for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and IHC analyses. For IHC analysis, tumor samples were stained with an anti-PSCA antibody or an anti-CD3 antibody; positive staining showed a brownish color (magnification, 200×).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 19 (1)
January 2020
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minicircle DNA-Engineered CAR T Cells Suppressed Tumor Growth in Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Minicircle DNA-Engineered CAR T Cells Suppressed Tumor Growth in Mice
Jinsheng Han, Fei Gao, Songsong Geng, Xueshuai Ye, Tie Wang, Pingping Du, Ziqi Cai, Zexian Fu, Zhilong Zhao, Long Shi, Qingxia Li and Jianhui Cai
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2020 (19) (1) 178-186; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0204

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Minicircle DNA-Engineered CAR T Cells Suppressed Tumor Growth in Mice
Jinsheng Han, Fei Gao, Songsong Geng, Xueshuai Ye, Tie Wang, Pingping Du, Ziqi Cai, Zexian Fu, Zhilong Zhao, Long Shi, Qingxia Li and Jianhui Cai
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2020 (19) (1) 178-186; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0204
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • TriTAC Molecules Direct T Cells to Eliminate Solid Tumors
  • Potent TRAILR2-Mediated Tumor Cell Death via CDH17 Anchoring
  • Multiple Mechanisms of Action of anti-TIGIT Antagonists
Show more Large Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement