Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Small Molecule Therapeutics

IKKβ Regulates VEGF Expression and Is a Potential Therapeutic Target for Ovarian Cancer as an Antiangiogenic Treatment

Yasuto Kinose, Kenjiro Sawada, Hiroshi Makino, Tomonori Ogura, Tomoko Mizuno, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoyuki Fujikawa, Eiichi Morii, Koji Nakamura, Ikuko Sawada, Aska Toda, Kae Hashimoto, Aki Isobe, Seiji Mabuchi, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Akiko Itai, Ken-ichirou Morishige, Hirohisa Kurachi and Tadashi Kimura
Yasuto Kinose
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenjiro Sawada
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: daasawada@gyne.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
Hiroshi Makino
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomonori Ogura
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomoko Mizuno
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noriko Suzuki
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomoyuki Fujikawa
3IMMD Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eiichi Morii
4Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koji Nakamura
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ikuko Sawada
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aska Toda
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kae Hashimoto
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aki Isobe
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seiji Mabuchi
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tsuyoshi Ohta
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata-shi, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiko Itai
3IMMD Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken-ichirou Morishige
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hirohisa Kurachi
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata-shi, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadashi Kimura
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0696 Published April 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer by antiangiogenic therapy has been shown in several clinical trials. However, although an anti-VEGF antibody (bevacizumab) is the only option currently available, its efficacy is limited and it is not cost effective for use in all patients. Therefore, the development of a novel antiangiogenic drug, especially composed of small-molecule compounds, could be a powerful armament for ovarian cancer treatment. As NF-κB signaling has the potential to regulate VEGF expression, we determined to identify whether VEGF expression is associated with NF-κB activation and to investigate the possibility of a novel IKKβ inhibitor, IMD-0354 (IMMD Inc.), as an antiangiogenic drug. Tissue microarrays from 94 ovarian cancer tissues were constructed and immunohistochemical analyses performed. We revealed that IKK phosphorylation is an independent prognostic factor (PFS: 26.1 vs. 49.8 months, P = 0.011), and is positively correlated with high VEGF expression. In in vitro analyses, IMD-0354 robustly inhibited adhesive and invasive activities of ovarian cancer cells without impairing cell viabilities. IMD-0354 significantly suppressed VEGF production from cancer cells, which led to the inhibition of angiogenesis. In a xenograft model, the treatment of IMD-0354 significantly inhibited peritoneal dissemination with a marked reduction of intratumoral blood vessel formation followed by the inhibition of VEGF expression from cancer cells. IMD-0354 is a stable small-molecule drug and has already been administered safely to humans in other trials. Antiangiogenic therapy targeting IKKβ is a potential future option to treat ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(4); 909–19. ©2015 AACR.

Introduction

The prognoses of patients with ovarian cancer have remained much the same since the late 1990s, and, for this reason, a large number of novel molecular targeted agents and innovative therapeutic associations of chemotherapy have been attempted and remain under investigation (1, 2). Among the new drugs studied for ovarian cancer, bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, has shown promising activities in combination with standard chemotherapy in several phase III trials, such as the ICON7 and GOG218 studies (3, 4).

Angiogenesis has been shown to be an important contributor to ovarian carcinogenesis and progression. Among various angiogenic factors, VEGF, the most endothelial cell–specific angiogenic factor characterized to date, induces endothelial cell proliferation, promotes cell migration, and inhibits apoptosis. VEGF is firmly believed to be a key regulator of physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis (5). Thus, it is likely that bevacizumab would be a powerful tool for ovarian cancer treatment. It has shown revolutionary efficacies not only as a first-line therapy combined with paclitaxel plus carboplatin but also as a treatment for relapsed cases. However, several concerns remain unresolved. In phase III trials (ICON7 and GOG218), although maintenance treatment with bevacizumab extended the length of PFS, this advantage stopped 10 months after the cessation of treatment and only ICON7 showed a trend toward improved overall survival (OS) in a subgroup of patients with high-risk disease (3, 4). In platinum-sensitive relapse, although bevacizumab has also been shown to improve PFS (OCEANS; ref. 6), no OS benefit was found. In platinum-resistant relapse, a recent phase III trial (AURELIA) reported an increase in response rate and a doubling of PFS (6.7 vs. 3.4 months) in those who received single-agent chemotherapy plus bevacizumab compared with chemotherapy alone, while the effect on OS has not been reported (2, 7). These clinical data indicate that, in order to improve OS, long-term continuous antiangiogenic maintenance therapy would be indispensable until patients show progressive disease. However, the pharmacoeconomic issue is obviously a major obstacle for clinical long-term use of bevacizumab in every patient. Hensley and colleagues commented that bevacizumab costs $78.3 million for 3.8 progression-free months for 600 women (8). Hence, we believe that it would be meaningful to find better compounds that specifically inhibit angiogenesis with safety profiles, given that antiangiogenic therapy is to be used in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies. Indeed, antiangiogenic molecules have been developed and many clinical trials are underway (9).

NF-κB is an inducible transcription factor that regulates a wide variety of gene expressions. Constitutive NF-κB signaling has been identified in tumors of epithelial origin, including breast, colon, lung, and ovarian carcinomas (10), and numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that NF-κB plays an important role in cancer progression, including angiogenesis (11). Although various studies have suggested that NF-κB signaling correlates with angiogenesis, the importance of NF-κB in terms of VEGF expression remains controversial (12–14). In addition, the prognostic value of high NF-κB activity on ovarian carcinomas is also controversial. Kleinberg and colleagues reported that the nuclear localization of NF-κB/RelA (p65) is frequently expressed in advanced stage serous ovarian carcinomas, and is associated with poor PFS (15), while Annunziata and colleagues wrote that high expression of cytoplasmic NF-κB1 (p50) was associated with poor survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer (16). However, more recently, Yang and colleagues showed that the nuclear accumulation of p65 in epithelial ovarian carcinomas is significantly associated with a good response to chemotherapy and can predict longer OS of patients (17). For these reasons, we were encouraged to analyze whether NF-κB signaling regulates VEGF expression in ovarian cancer tissues as well as whether targeting this signaling can be an alternative option for the inhibition of VEGF expression, leading to a new antiangiogenic therapy.

The NF-κB/Rel family includes NF-κB1 (p50), NF-κB2 (p52), RelA (p65), RelB, and c-Rel. They can all form homo- and heterodimers, with the most abundant form being p50/p65 (18). These dimers are present in the cytosol in an inactive form, complexed with proteins of the IκB family. Upon stimulation, phosphorylation of IκB by IκB kinase (IKK) leads to degradation of IκB and renders NF-κB free to translocate into the nucleus. The nuclear NF-κB binds to promoters and enhancers, leading to gene transcription (11). Two IκB kinases, IKKα and IKKβ, have been well described. It is known that they have nonequivalent functions and that activation of IKK-β, rather than IKK-α, participates in the primary pathway, by which proinflammatory stimuli activate NF-κB (18). Given that the indispensable roles played by NF-κB in many biologic processes raise the concern that a complete shutdown of this pathway would have significant detrimental effects on normal cellular function, drugs that selectively target only IKK-β activity could be of greater therapeutic value (19). IMD-0354 is a newly synthesized low molecular weight compound that selectively inhibits IKKβ in the IKK complex. IMD-1041 is a prodrug of IMD-0354 for oral administration and on its way to clinical application at present. A phase I study was completed and up to 12 weeks of IMD-1041 administration proved to be sufficiently safe with very few adverse events ranked as mild (20). Therefore, we determined to elucidate the effect of this drug on ovarian cancer cells, focusing especially on VEGF expression.

With these goals in mind, we first constructed tissue microarrays (TMA) from ovarian cancer samples and immunostained them with phosphorylated-IKK and VEGF antibody. We revealed that IKK phosphorylation is an independent prognostic factor and that its expression was positively correlated with high VEGF expression, suggesting that NF-κB activation regulates VEGF expression in ovarian cancer tissues. Furthermore, we assessed the potential of a small molecular weight IKK inhibitor, IMD-0354, as a novel therapeutic option for antiangiogenic treatment against ovarian cancer.

Materials and Methods

Materials

IMD-0354, a synthetic IKK-β inhibitor, was supplied by IMMD Inc.. Growth factor–reduced basement membrane proteins (Matrigel), human fibronectin, collagen type 1, and Integrins Sampler Kits [#611435] were purchased from BD Biosciences. Antibodies against VEGF (A-20), integrin α1 (R-164), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2; H-76), and CD31 (M-20) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies against p-IKKα/β (Ser176/180), IκB-α, β-actin, and cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibody against Ki-67 (RM-9106) was from Thermo Scientific.

Cell culture

SKOV3ip1 cells (serous adenocarcinoma, mutation; PIK3CA, ARID1A, amplification; ERBB2; ref. 21) were kindly provided by Dr. Ernst Lengyel (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) in 2007. RMUG-S cells (mucinous adenocarcinoma, mutation; TP53; ref. 21) were obtained from the Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan) in 2008. CaOV3 (serous adenocarcinoma, mutation; TP53) and ES-2 cell lines (clear-cell carcinoma, mutation; TP53, BRAF; ref. 21) were purchased from ATCC (CaOV3; in 2007, ES-2; in 2014). Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1,000 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin and incubated in 95% air/5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells were authenticated by short tandem repeat DNA profiling at Takara-Bio Inc. and were used for this study within 6 months of resuscitation. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were collected as previously reported (22).

TMA preparation and immunohistochemistry

Ovarian carcinoma samples were collected from patients treated at Gifu University Hospital (Gifu, Japan) between 2006 and 2011 and used to construct the tissue microarray slides. From the corresponding regions in paraffin blocks, tissue cores (diameter, 3 mm) were removed using a hollow needle, arrayed in paraffin blocks and sliced (4 μm) onto slides. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Satisfactory tissue cores were finally obtained from 94 patients, and the corresponding clinical data were collected. The slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated with 100% ethanol before antigen unmasking was performed by boiling in Target Retrieval Solution (pH 9.0; Nichirei Biosciences). After being placed in 3% H2O2 and being blocked with blocking solution (Dako), they were incubated with the primary p-IKKα/β antibody at 1:150 and VEGF-A antibody at 1:40 for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST), they were stained using the Envision system (Dako) and then counterstained with Carrazzi hematoxylin. Slides were intensively examined by two independent qualified pathologists (E. Morii and S. Mabuchi) without knowledge of the clinical outcomes. The phospho-IKK staining sample was scored on the basis of the intensity of the staining (0, none; 1, weak; 2, strong). “Positive” expression of p-IKK was defined if the score of intensity was 1 or 2. “Negative” expression was defined if the score of intensity was 0. Human VEGF-A staining was scored on the basis of the intensity of the staining (1, weak; 2, medium; 3, strong) and the percentage of positive cells (1, <10%; 2, 10%–40%; 3, >40%). “High” VEGF expression was defined if the total score of intensity and density was ≥5. “Low” VEGF expression was defined if the total score was ≤4.

Cell viability assessment

Ovarian cancer cells (3 × 103 cells) were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS with increasing concentrations of IMD-0354 ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 μmol/L for 48 hours. Cell viability was assessed using the CyQUANT cell proliferation assay kit (Molecular Probes). Cell viability was expressed as the ratio of the number of viable cells with IMD-0354 treatment to the number without treatment.

Western blot analysis

A total of 5 × 105 cells were plated onto 6-well plates and lysed with 1 × Cell Lysis Buffer (Cell Signaling Technology). Lysates (15 μg) were separated by 5%–20% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by incubation with the primary antibodies (p-IKKα/β, 1:1,000 in 5% BSA; IκB-α, 1:1,000 in 5% BSA; integrin α1, 1:1,000 in 5% BSA; integrin α2, 1:1,000 in 5% BSA; integrin α5, 1:2,500 in 5% BSA; integrin β1, 1:2,500 in 5% BSA; integrin β3, 1:2,500 in 5% BSA; MMP-2, 1:1,000 in 5% BSA; β-actin, 1:2,000 in 5% BSA, and then with a corresponding secondary horseradish peroxidase–conjugated IgG). The proteins were visualized with an electrochemiluminescent system (PerkinElmer Life Science).

Immunofluorescent analysis

A total of 5 × 103 cells were plated on 8-well chamber slides and allowed to attach overnight. After pretreatment with 0.1 μmol/L of IMD-0354 for 24 hours, the cells were stimulated by TNFα (10 ng/mL, 30 minutes), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 1:200 rabbit anti-human NF-κB p65 (Cell Signaling Technology) at room temperature for 1 hour. After washing, samples were incubated with 1:50 Alexa Fluor 555-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (A-21429; Life Technologies) and finally stained with DAPI. The samples were observed using an FV1000-D Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (Olympus).

In vitro adhesion assay

Ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3ip1 or RMUG-S, 5 × 104) were plated in a 96-well plate precoated with 50 μg/mL fibronectin or 50 μg/mL type I collagen. After incubation for 45 minutes at 37°C, cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with methanol, and stained with Giemsa solution. The number of adhesive cells was counted under a light microscope.

Matrigel invasion assay

In vitro cellular invasion assay was performed as described previously (23).

Luciferase activity assay

The pGL4-phVEGFA plasmid bearing human VEGF-A promoter sequence [position; 3853–5157 of human VEGF sequence (NG_008732)] into a firefly luciferase vector was obtained from RIKEN BioResource Center. 5′-deletion mutant were made by deleting fragments using internal restriction sites for NheI (mut pGL4-phVEGFA, position; 5043–5157). A total of 1 × 105 SKOV3ip1 cells were seeded in 12-well plates. After the replacement of culture media by Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Media (Life Technologies), 1.0 μg of pGL4-phVEGFA, and 0.1 μg of pRL-TK Renilla luciferase vector were cotransfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies). On the next day, various concentrations of IMD-0354 were treated and, 24 hours later, luciferase activity was determined using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Firefly luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase values.

ELISA of human VEGF-A

A total of 1 × 105 SKOV3ip1 cells were plated on 6-well plates. The cells were then starved in serum-free medium with various concentrations of IMD-0354 or the equivalent volume of DMSO for 24 hours. Thereafter, conditioned culture media were collected and stored at −80°C until analysis. Human VEGF-A Platinum ELISA Kit (eBiosecience) was used to determine the concentration of VEGF-A.

Wound healing assay

HUVECs were cultured to subconfluence in 24-well culture plates and one wound of approximately 0.4 mm per well was made with a P-200 plastic tip. The cells were further cultured in serum-free conditions in the absence or presence of 5 ng/mL VEGF or concentrated SKOV3ip1 cells culture medium. Concentrated SKOV3ip1 cells culture medium was collected by culturing cells in serum-free DMEM with or without IMD-0354 in a subconfluent condition for 24 hours and concentrated using Amicon Centrifugal Filter Units (Merck Millipore). Forty-eight hours after the incubation, the cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde and stained with Giemsa solution. Migration was assessed by examining photographs of the cells that had migrated inside the wound area.

Animal experiments

Female athymic BALB/c nude mice (aged 4–5 weeks) were purchased from CLEA Japan Inc. and were bred in aseptic conditions and kept at constant humidity and temperature (25–28°C). All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Osaka University (Osaka, Japan), in accordance with institutional and NIH guidelines. Ovarian cancer cells were suspended as single cells in a volume of 0.5 mL of PBS (SKOV3ip1; 1 × 106 cells, ES-2; 2 × 106 cells) and injected intraperitonally into the mice. Mice were assessed daily for general health and development of ascites. After the inoculation (SKOV3ip1; 7 days, ES-2; 3 days), the mice were intraperitonally administered either 0.5 mL of 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na; Wako, Osaka, Japan) or IMD-0354 (30 mg/kg) every day for a total of 6 weeks to the SKOV3ip1 inoculated mice or 11 days to the ES-2 inoculated mice and finally sacrificed. The number of metastases and the volume of ascites in each mouse were counted, carefully dissected, and the removed tumors weighed. Tumor tissues were immediately fixed and embedded in paraffin. The slides were prepared and incubated with p-IKKα/β antibody at 1:150, human VEGF antibody at 1:40, mouse CD-31 antibody, Ki-67 antibody, and cleaved caspase-3 antibody at 1:300 for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with TBST, they were stained using N-Histofine Simple Stain MAX PO(R) (Nichirei Biosciences) and then counterstained with Carrazzi hematoxylin.

Statistical analysis

Statcel version 3 (OMS-Publishing Inc., Saitama, Japan) and JMP version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Japan Ltd.) were used for statistical analyses. Data were expressed as means ± SEM. Differences were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Survival estimates were computed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Phosphorylation of IKK is an independent prognostic marker of ovarian cancer

First, TMA slides from patients with ovarian cancer were established. The characteristics of 94 patients are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Phospho-IKK expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and each sample was scored on the basis of the intensity of staining. Typically, clear cytoplasmic staining was seen in the cases of positive p-IKK expression (Fig. 1A). Of 94 patients, 58 (61.7%) showed strong p-IKK expression, 23 (24.4%) weak, and 13 (13.8%) cases were negatively expressed. In total, 81 (86.2%) cases showed positive p-IKK expression. Among patients with ovarian cancer, those who had positive p-IKK staining showed significantly worse PFS than those who had negative expression (PFS, 26.1 vs. 49.8 months, P = 0.011; Fig. 1B). Positive p-IKK staining also showed a trend toward worse OS compared with those with negative expression (OS, 34.0 vs. 50.9 months, P = 0.073; Fig. 1C). For a multivariate analysis, a backward elimination approach was used to select a model for survival with multiple predictors. Age, FIGO stage, histologic type, residual tumor at the time of surgery, and positive p-IKK expression were entered in this model. The final model included positive p-IKK expression as a significant independent predictor for reduced PFS in patients with ovarian cancer [P = 0.019; HR, 5.85 (1.26–104.26); Supplementary Table S2].

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Phospho-IKK expression correlates with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. Immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays with malignant ovarian tissue sections (A). Representative areas of four different ovarian cancers stained using an anti-human phospho-IKK antibody and scored as 0, 1, and 2. No positive signal was observed by nonimmune area. Original magnification, ×200. Bar, 100 μm. Kaplan–Meier curves of progression-free survival (B) and overall survival (C) of patients with ovarian cancer treated at Gifu University Hospital (n = 94).

High VEGF expression is an independent prognostic marker in ovarian cancer patients and positively correlates with IKK phosphorylation

Second, VEGF expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using anti-VEGF-A antibody. VEGF staining was scored on the basis of the intensity of the staining and the percentage of positive cells. Representative pictures from four different histologies are shown in Fig. 2A. Forty-seven (50.0%) cases were defined as “high” VEGF expression. Patients with high VEGF expression had a significantly worse PFS than those with low VEGF expression (26.4 vs. 32.4 months, P = 0.014; Fig. 2B). High VEGF expression also showed a trend toward worse OS compared with those with low VEGF expression (35.6 vs. 37.0 months, P = 0.086; Fig. 2C). Forty-four of 81 cases (54.3%) in which IKKα/β was phosphorylated showed high VEGF expression, whereas only 3 (23.1%) of 13 cases in which p-IKKα/β expression was negative showed high VEGF expression. The correlation of IKK phosphorylation and VEGF expression was examined with the χ2 test, revealing that these expressions were significantly positively correlated (Fig. 2D; P = 0.037).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

VEGF expression correlates with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. Immunohistochemical staining of TMAs with malignant ovarian tissue sections (A). Representative areas of four different ovarian cancers stained using an anti-human VEGF-A antibody and scored as 1, 2, and 3. No positive signal was observed by nonimmune area. Original magnification, ×200. Bar, 100 μm. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS (B) and OS (C) of patients with ovarian cancer (n = 94). High VEGF expression was significantly more frequent in tumors that showed phosphorylated IKK expression than in those that had negative phosphorylated IKK staining (D). Statistical differences were examined by χ2 test (P = 0.037).

Constitutive activation of NF-κB in ovarian cancer cells was inhibited by IMD-0354

As IKK phosphorylation was correlated with VEGF expression in clinical samples and its expression was associated with poor prognosis, we were encouraged to analyze the effect of an IKKβ inhibitor on ovarian cancer cells. IMD-0354 [N-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-5-chloro-2-hydroxy-benzamide], with MW 383.7 (Fig. 3A), a specific IKK-β inhibitor selectively blocking IκBα phosphorylation (IC50; ≤ 250 nmol/L; ref. 24) was used for the experiments. Although IMD-0354 at up to 1 μmol/L did not affect the viabilities of SKOV3ip1 or RMUG-S ovarian cancer cells (Fig. 3B), it inhibited the constitutive phosphorylation of IKK (Fig. 3C). To determine the effect of IMD-0354 on NF-κB activation, the localization of NF-κB p65 was examined by immunofluorescence analyses. SKOV3ip1 cells were immunostained with an anti-p65 antibody and cell nuclei were identified by costaining with DAPI. NF-κB p65 was dominantly located in the cytoplasm in the control and upon TNFα stimulation, p65 drastically translocated into nuclei. The pretreatment of 0.1 μmol/L IMD-0354 almost inhibited its nuclear translocation (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

IMD-0354 inhibits NF-κB activation of ovarian cancer cells. Molecular formula of IMD-0354 (A). Culturing of ovarian cancer cells (left, SKOV3ip1; right, RMUG-S) with up to 1 μmol/L IMD-0354 had no effect on their viability (B). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 5 from triplicate independent experiments. Western blot analysis (C). SKOV3ip1 and RMUG-S cells were incubated with IMD-0354 for 24 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-phosphorylated IKKα/β antibody (top). The membranes were stripped and rehybridized with antibodies detecting IκBα (middle) or β-actin (lower). IMD-0354 inhibits NF-κB nuclear translocation induced by TNFα (D). Representative confocal images of SKOV3ip1 cells stimulated by TNFα (+) (10 ng/mL, 30 minutes) with or without pretreatment of 0.1 μmol/L IMD-0354 are shown. Cells were immunostained with Alexa Fluor 555–labeled NF-κB p65 (red). In controls, NF-κB was dominantly located in the cytoplasm (top). TNFα stimulation (middle) induced the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65. IMD-0354 inhibited its nuclear translocation (lower). Bar, 50 μm.

IMD-0354 inhibits adhesion and invasion of ovarian cancer cells

Next, we evaluated the effects of IMD-0354 on cell adhesion and invasion. IMD-0354 significantly inhibited the adhesion onto fibronectin (0.3 μmol/L: SKOV3ip1, 51%; RMUG-S, 55%, respectively) as well as onto collagen type I (0.3 μmol/L: SKOV3ip1, 62%; RMUG-S, 58%, respectively) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). To analyze how IMD-0354 inhibited cell adhesion, the expressions of various integrins were examined by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4C). β1 Integrin expression was inhibited by IMD-0354 treatment in each ovarian cancer cell line tested (SKOV3ip1, RMUG-S, and CaOV3), while the expressions of the other integrins tested (α1, α2, α5, and β3-integrin) were not altered. Cell invasion follows adhesion. In vitro invasion assay revealed that IMD-0354 significantly impaired the invasion of cancer cells (0.3 μmol/L: SKOV3ipi, 27%; RMUG-S, 33%, respectively; Fig. 4D). The expression of MMP-2, known as an important molecule in ovarian cancer invasion, was inhibited by the treatment with IMD-0354 (Fig. 4E).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

IMD-0354 causes significant inhibition of adhesion and invasion of ovarian cancer cell lines. In vitro adhesion assay (A). A total of 5 × 104 ovarian cancer cells (left, SKOV3ip1; right, RMUG-S) were plated onto 50 μg/mL fibronectin- or collagen type 1–coated 96-well plates. After incubation for 45 minutes at 37°C, plates were washed to discard nonadherent cells and the number of adherent cells was counted under a light microscope. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 5 from triplicate independent experiments. Representative image of in vitro adhesion assay of SKOV3ip1 cells is shown (B). Bar, 200 μm. Western blot analysis (C). SKOV3ip1, RMUG-S, and CaOV3 cells were incubated with 0.3 μmol/L of IMD-0354 or control for 24 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with an antibody against integrin α1, α2, α5, β1, and β3. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Each sample was run in triplicate. Numbers show the ratio between integrins indicated and β-actin expression. In vitro invasion assay (D). A total 5 × 104 SKOV3ip1 (left) or RMUS-S (right) cells were placed on the top chamber in serum-free medium with IMD-0354, and allowed to invade for 24 hours. Noninvading cells were removed using a cotton swab, and invading cells on the underside of the filter were enumerated. Representative images are shown. Bar, 100 μm. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 5 from triplicate independent experiments. Western blot analysis (E). Cell lysates were immunoblotted with an antibody against MMP-2. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Each sample was run in triplicate. Numbers show the ratio between MMP2 and β-Actin expression. **, P < 0.01.

IMD-0354 inhibits VEGF production from ovarian cancer cells, leading to the inhibition of angiogenesis

Next, we examined the effect of IMD-0354 on VEGF production from cancer cells. Luciferase assay revealed that VEGF-A transcriptional activity was significantly inhibited by IMD-0354 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). Several possible NF-κB–like binding sites within the VEGF 5′-promoter region were previously reported (12) and pGL4-phVEGFA plasmid has two possible binding sites (4332–4341, 4992–4931; Fig. 5B). Thus, 5′-deletion mutant (mut pGL4-phVEGFA) was made by deleting fragments containing these sites and a luciferase assay was performed (Fig. 5C). Luciferase activity was drastically abolished and IMD-0354 did not show any inhibitory effects, indicating that NF-κB directly regulates VEGF promoter activity. Accordingly, IMD-0354 treatment of SKOV3ip1 cells resulted in a decrease in the levels of VEGF-A protein from 1.61 ng/mL to 0.97 ng/mL as evidenced by quantitative ELISA (Fig. 5D). To clarify the antiangiogenic effect of IMD-0354 in vitro, the migratory activity of HUVECs was examined by a wound healing assay. Representative images are shown in Fig. 5E. VEGF-A 5 ng/mL was used as a positive control. The direct treatment of IMD-0354 to HUVECs did not affect the migration. While SKOV3ip1 culture media induced HUVECs migration and almost restored the scratched wound after 48 hours of incubation, the pretreatment of IMD-0354 to SKOV3ip1 cells inhibited HUVECs migration (Fig. 5F). The cotreatment of VEGF-A almost abolished the inhibitory effect of IMD-0354, indicating that IMD-0354 inhibited the migratory activity of HUVECs by inhibiting VEGF production from SKOV3ip1 cells.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

IMD-0354 inhibits VEGF production from ovarian cancer cells, which leads to the inhibition of HUVECs migration induced by cancer cells. Effect of IMD-0354 on VEGF-A transcription activation (A). pGL4-hVEGFA firefly luciferase vector and Renilla luciferase reporter, pRL-TK, were cotransfected into SKOV3ip1 cells. VEGF-A transcriptional activity was reduced in a dose-dependent manner by the treatment with IMD-0354. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 5 from triplicate independent experiments. The schema of original and mutant pGL4-phVEGFA vector (mut pGL4-phVEGFA; B). Possible NF-κB binding sites of VEGFA promoter are shown. Luciferase activity was drastically abolished with mut pGL4-phVEGFA and IMD-0354 did not show any inhibitory effects (C). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 4 from triplicate independent experiments. ELISA assay of VEGF-A (D). A total of 1 × 105 SKOV3ip1 cells were cultured with 2 mL of 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/DMEM with or without IMD-0354 for 24 hours. Conditioned media were collected and the concentration of human VEGF-A was measured. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 4 from triplicate independent experiments. Effect of IMD-0354 on HUVECs migration examined by a wound healing assay (E). Endothelial cell monolayers were wounded at time 0, and cultures were incubated with serum-free media (top) or conditioned media from SKOV3ip1 cells (lower). Forty-eight hours later, cells were fixed and representative pictures were taken. A total of 5 ng/mL of human VEGF-A was used as a positive control. Bar, 200 μm. Percentage wound recovery was measured and compared with that at time 0 (F). Experiments were repeated seven times and values are means ± SEM; n.s., not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; n.s., not significant.

IMD-0354 inhibits peritoneal metastasis in an ovarian cancer xenograft model by inhibiting VEGF production from cancer cells

Finally, we examined the therapeutic potential of IMD-0354 in an ovarian cancer xenograft model. SKOV-3ip1 (1 × 106 cells) were injected intraperitoneally into female BALB/c nu/nu mice. One week after the inoculation, mice showed multiple tumor dissemination on the peritoneal surface, the omentum, the surface of the liver and the small bowel mesentery. As preliminary experiments, dose-finding study (7.5 mg, 15 mg or 30 mg/kg) was performed and 30 mg/kg showed the maximum effect without apparent adverse events on mice (Supplementary Fig. S1). Six weeks after treatment, both the tumor weight and the number of peritoneal implants were significantly inhibited in mice treated with IMD-0354 compared with controls (tumor weight: IMD-0354; 176.2 ± 136.9 vs. control; 518.6 ± 338.4 mg, number of peritoneal implants: 1.9 ± 2.7 vs. 26.1 ± 17.2, respectively, P < 0.001; Fig. 6A and B). Similarly, in another ovarian cancer xenograft model with ES-2, IMD-0354 significantly exerted antitumor effects on tumor weight, number of peritoneal metastases, and ascites formation compared with the control (tumor weight: IMD-0354; 227.6 ± 109.8 vs. control; 576.5 ± 180.6 mg, P < 0.001, number of peritoneal implants: 15.4 ± 6.7 vs. 31.8 ± 10.1, P < 0.001, ascites: 1.06 ± 0.72 vs. 2.84 ± 1.28 g, P < 0.01, respectively; Fig. 6C–E). To analyze how IMD-0354 worked in vivo, immunohistochemical analyses from inoculated tumors were performed (Fig. 6F). Not only the phosphorylation of IKK but the expression of human VEGF was evidently inhibited in tumors treated with IMD-0354 compared with controls. Accordingly, the number of intratumoral vessels as presented by anti-mouse CD31 staining was significantly inhibited by the treatment with IMD-0354 (27.2 ± 5.7 vs. 96.0 ± 36.1/× 200 field, respectively, P < 0.01; Fig. 6G). In contrast, the staining of peritoneal tumors with the proliferation marker Ki-67 and the apoptotic marker cleaved caspase-3 did not show significant difference between IMD-0354–treated mice and controls (Fig. 6H and I), suggesting that IMD-0354 inhibited ovarian cancer progression by inhibiting angiogenesis through the suppression of VEGF production from cancer cells.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Treatment of IMD-0354 inhibits peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells through the inhibition of VEGF production from cancer cells. Ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3ip1; 1 × 106 cells, ES-2; 2 × 106 cells) were injected intraperitoneally into female BALB/c nu/nu mice. After the injection (SKOV3ip1, 7 days; ES-2, 3 days), IMD-0354 (30 mg/kg body weight) or an equal amount of 0.5% CMC-Na (control) was injected intraperitoneally daily for a total of 6 weeks to the SKOV3ip1 inoculated mice or for 11 days to the ES-2 inoculated mice. Effect of IMD-0354 on intraperitoneal tumor weight (A), number of metastases (B) in SKOV3ip1 inoculated mice. Effect of IMD-0354 on intraperitoneal tumor weight (C), number of metastases (D), and ascites formation (E) in ES-2–inoculated mice. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, each n = 18, respectively. Representative SKOV3ip1 tumor areas were stained with H&E, p-IKKα/β, human VEGF, the angiogenesis marker anti-mouse CD31, the proliferation marker Ki-67, and the apoptotic marker cleaved caspase-3 (F). Bar, 50 μm. Number of microvessels per field by CD31 staining (G), the percentage of Ki-67–positive nuclei (H), and the percentage of cleaved caspase-3–positive cells (I). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5, each. n.s., not significant; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.01; n.s., not significant.

Discussion

In this study, we revealed that, in more than 80% of ovarian cancer cases, IKK is phosphorylated and its phosphorylation is an independent prognosis factor for patients and positively correlates with high VEGF expression. Furthermore, using a new IKKβ inhibitor, IMD-0354, we showed that this drug not only suppressed the adhesion and invasion of ovarian cancer cells but also transcriptionally inhibited VEGF production from cancer cells, which led to attenuation of the migration of endothelial cells induced by cancer cells. In a xenograft model, the treatment with IMD-0354 significantly inhibited peritoneal dissemination with a marked reduction of blood vessel formation. Thus, we suggest that an IKKβ inhibitor such as IMD-0354 can be considered to be an antiangiogenic agent and a potential treatment for ovarian cancer, given that VEGF is one of the most potent and specific angiogenic factors of tumor-induced angiogenesis.

As it is clear that angiogenesis is an indispensable contributor to ovarian carcinogenesis and progression, we believe that research and development into new antiangiogenic compounds should continue, to maximize the benefits and minimize the side effects as well as the costs. Following the success of bevacizumab, new molecules active against angiogenesis have been developed and several studies have been conducted or are underway. Some small-molecule inhibitors of multitargeted tyrosine kinase (TKI), including VEGFR, have been shown to be active in ovarian cancer (9). For example, pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor that inhibits VEGF receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor and c-Kit. In a phase II study evaluating pazopanib in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the overall response rate was 18% and the median response duration was 113 days (25, 26). A recent phase III clinical trial (AGO-OVAR16) showed that pazopanib extended PFS by an average of 5.6 months (17.9 months vs. 12.3 months), compared with a placebo, in women with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent initial successful treatment, while the interim analysis showed no difference in OS between the groups (27). Other TKIs such as sunitinib or sorafenib have shown limited results (28, 29). Angiopoietins are circulating protein growth factors that promote angiogenesis by interacting with Tie2 receptors. The antiangiopoietin 1/2 peptibody, AMG386, given in combination with weekly paclitaxel demonstrated prolongation of PFS in a randomized phase II trial with recurrent ovarian cancer patients (30). Although several candidates are under evaluation, none of the molecules inhibiting NF-κB pathways have been used as an angiogenesis inhibitor in the clinical setting so far. Herein, we suggested the potential of an IKK inhibitor, IMD-0354, for ovarian cancer treatment.

Angiogenesis in cancer has been shown to be associated with the chemokines (like monocyte chemoattractant protein, IL8) or the growth factors (like TNFα). NF-κB activation is well known to play a role in the regulation of these angiogenesis-inducing products (31). Although VEGF is a potent angiogenic factor, the mere inhibition of VEGF with bevacizumab has failed to demonstrate substantial prolongation of OS in patients with ovarian cancer, indicating that there are several alternative pathways of angiogenesis other than the VEGF pathway. Thus, targeting NF-κB has the potential to inhibit various angiogenesis pathways and is likely to be promising as an antiangiogenic therapy. While small-molecule compound inhibitors of NF-κB have been proposed as a promising therapy for cancers with aberrant NF-κB activity, most classical NF-κB inhibitors are poorly selective and are known to have off-target effects and so few of them have progressed to phase III clinical trials (32). Because proteasome-mediated degradation of IκB is a required step in NF-κB signaling, the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, has been proposed as a general inhibitor of NF-κB; it is the only one clinically available and approved as the first-line treatment for advanced multiple myeloma (33). However, there remains a concern that proteasome inhibition may affect other signaling pathways. IMD-0354 is a synthesized low molecular weight compound that specifically inhibits IKKβ, inducing the inhibition of NF-κB activation only in inflammatory conditions, and it was proven that this drug does not inhibit other kinases, proteases, or proteasome-related immune responses (34). No IKKβ inhibitor is known to be in the process of clinical application at present, except for IMD-1041, a prodrug of IMD-0354; a phase I study with the IMD-0354 capsule confirmed sufficient safety (20). Since it appears obvious that the mere inhibition of NF-κB would be insufficient for a pronounced response unless combined with apoptosis-inducing drugs for ovarian cancer treatment, NF-κB inhibitors should be used as adjuvants along with cytotoxic chemotherapies in the clinical setting. For these reasons, we assume that IMD-0354 would be an ideal candidate because it is feasible for combination with current chemotherapies. Several previous studies have reported the effect of IMD-0354 on adult T-cell leukemia cells (20), breast cancer cells (35) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells (36). In these studies, at higher concentrations (1–50 μmol/L), IMD-0354 induced apoptosis of cancer cells. Indeed, in our experience, 10 μmol/L of IMD-0354 comprehensively induced apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells tested by G0–G1 phase cell-cycle arrest (data not shown). However, given that the IC50 value for IKKβ of IMD-0354 is ≤250 nmol/L, these apoptotic effects appear to be caused by a nonspecific toxicity of the drug. Further elucidation would be required to identify how IMD-0354 works on cancer cells.

In immunohistochemical analyses, 81 of 94 (86%) ovarian cancer samples showed positive phosphorylated IKK expression. This is similar to previous findings (15–17). Although some in vitro studies using ovarian cancer cell lines suggested that NF-κB regulates VEGF expression (37), to our knowledge, none has reported the direct correlation of NF-κB activation and VEGF expression in clinical samples. In the current study, we reported that ovarian cancer tissues with positive p-IKK staining significantly expressed high levels of VEGF, proposing a clear rationale that targeting IKK phosphorylation can be considered an antiangiogenic therapy for ovarian cancer treatment.

In conclusion, IKK phosphorylation is an independent prognostic factor and is associated with VEGF expression in cancer tissues. IMD-0354 not only inhibited ovarian cancer invasion but suppressed VEGF production from cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. In light of multiple publications highlighting the importance of angiogenesis in ovarian tumor biology and the results described here, we are supportive of clinical trials to study whether antagonizing IKKβ phosphorylation is a viable treatment strategy for ovarian cancer.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: K. Sawada, H. Makino, T. Fujikawa, A. Itai

Development of methodology: H. Makino, T. Fujikawa, K. Hashimoto, A. Isobe, A. Itai

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): Y. Kinose, H. Makino, T. Ogura, E. Morii, K. Nakamura, I. Sawada, A. Toda, K.-I. Morishige

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): Y. Kinose, K. Sawada, H. Makino, E. Morii, K.-I. Morishige

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: Y. Kinose, K. Sawada, H. Makino, H. Kurachi, T. Kimura

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): H. Makino, T. Mizuno, N. Suzuki, T. Fujikawa, S. Mabuchi, T. Ohta, H. Kurachi

Study supervision: H. Makino, T. Fujikawa, A. Itai, T. Kimura

Grant Support

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (24592515, 26670725, and 26293360 to K. Sawada; 24659723, to H. Kurachi).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yuko Nishimura for her secretarial assistance and Ayako Okamura for her technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received August 22, 2014.
  • Revision received December 10, 2014.
  • Accepted January 14, 2015.
  • ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pisano C,
    2. Bruni GS,
    3. Facchini G,
    4. Marchetti C,
    5. Pignata S
    . Treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2009;5:421–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tomao F,
    2. Papa A,
    3. Rossi L,
    4. Caruso D,
    5. Zoratto F,
    6. Benedetti Panici P,
    7. et al.
    Beyond bevacizumab: investigating new angiogenesis inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2014;23:37–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Perren TJ,
    2. Swart AM,
    3. Pfisterer J,
    4. Ledermann JA,
    5. Pujade-Lauraine E,
    6. Kristensen G,
    7. et al.
    A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2484–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Burger RA,
    2. Brady MF,
    3. Bookman MA,
    4. Fleming GF,
    5. Monk BJ,
    6. Huang H,
    7. et al.
    Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2473–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ferrara N
    . Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in regulation of physiological angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001;280:1358–66.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Aghajanian C,
    2. Blank SV,
    3. Goff BA,
    4. Judson PL,
    5. Teneriello MG,
    6. Husain A,
    7. et al.
    OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2039–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pujade-Lauraine E,
    2. Hilpert F,
    3. Weber B,
    4. Reuss A,
    5. Poveda A,
    6. Kristensen G,
    7. et al.
    AURELIA: A randomized phase III trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) for platinum (PT)-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (OC): Gynecologic Cancer Track 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr LBA5002)
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hensley ML
    . Big costs for little gain in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1230–2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hall M,
    2. Gourley C,
    3. McNeish I,
    4. Ledermann J,
    5. Gore M,
    6. Jayson G,
    7. et al.
    Targeted anti-vascular therapies for ovarian cancer: current evidence. Br J Cancer 2013;108:250–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Karin M
    . Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. Nature 2006;441:431–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dai L,
    2. Gu L,
    3. Ding C,
    4. Qiu L,
    5. Di W
    . TWEAK promotes ovarian cancer cell metastasis via NF-kappaB pathway activation and VEGF expression. Cancer Lett 2009;283:159–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kiriakidis S,
    2. Andreakos E,
    3. Monaco C,
    4. Foxwell B,
    5. Feldmann M,
    6. Paleolog E
    . VEGF expression in human macrophages is NF-kappaB-dependent: studies using adenoviruses expressing the endogenous NF-kappaB inhibitor IkappaBalpha and a kinase-defective form of the IkappaB kinase 2. J Cell Sci 2003;116:665–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Abeyama K,
    2. Eng W,
    3. Jester JV,
    4. Vink AA,
    5. Edelbaum D,
    6. Cockerell CJ,
    7. et al.
    A role for NF-kappaB-dependent gene transactivation in sunburn. J Clin Invest 2000;105:1751–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bancroft CC,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Dong G,
    4. Sunwoo JB,
    5. Yeh N,
    6. Park C,
    7. et al.
    Coexpression of proangiogenic factors IL-8 and VEGF by human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involves coactivation by MEK-MAPK and IKK-NF-kappaB signal pathways. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:435–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kleinberg L,
    2. Dong HP,
    3. Holth A,
    4. Risberg B,
    5. Trope CG,
    6. Nesland JM,
    7. et al.
    Cleaved caspase-3 and nuclear factor-kappaB p65 are prognostic factors in metastatic serous ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2009;40:795–806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Annunziata CM,
    2. Stavnes HT,
    3. Kleinberg L,
    4. Berner A,
    5. Hernandez LF,
    6. Birrer MJ,
    7. et al.
    Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer. Cancer 2010;116:3276–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yang G,
    2. Xiao X,
    3. Rosen DG,
    4. Cheng X,
    5. Wu X,
    6. Chang B,
    7. et al.
    The biphasic role of NF-kappaB in progression and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2181–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tak PP,
    2. Firestein GS
    . NF-kappaB: a key role in inflammatory diseases. J Clin Invest 2001;107:7–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hamaya R,
    2. Ogawa M,
    3. Kobayashi N,
    4. Suzuki J,
    5. Itai A,
    6. Hirata Y,
    7. et al.
    A novel IKK inhibitor prevents progression of restenosis after arterial injury in mice. Int Heart J 2011;53:133–8.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Uota S,
    2. Zahidunnabi Dewan M,
    3. Saitoh Y,
    4. Muto S,
    5. Itai A,
    6. Utsunomiya A,
    7. et al
    . An IkappaB kinase 2 inhibitor IMD-0354 suppresses the survival of adult T-cell leukemia cells. Cancer Sci 2012;103:100–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Domcke S,
    2. Sinha R,
    3. Levine DA,
    4. Sander C,
    5. Schultz N
    . Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles. Nat Commun 2013;4:2126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Sawada K,
    2. Morishige K,
    3. Mabuchi S,
    4. Ogata S,
    5. Kawase C,
    6. Sakata M,
    7. et al.
    In vitro and in vivo assays to analyze the contribution of Rho kinase in angiogenesis. Methods Enzymol 2008;439:395–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ohyagi-Hara C,
    2. Sawada K,
    3. Kamiura S,
    4. Tomita Y,
    5. Isobe A,
    6. Hashimoto K,
    7. et al.
    miR-92a inhibits peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting integrin α5 expression. Am J Pathol 2013;182:1876–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Onai Y,
    2. Suzuki J,
    3. Kakuta T,
    4. Maejima Y,
    5. Haraguchi G,
    6. Fukasawa H,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of IkappaB phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 2004;63:51–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Wei XW,
    2. Zhang ZR,
    3. Wei YQ
    . Anti-angiogenic drugs currently in Phase II clinical trials for gynecological cancer treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2013;22:1181–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Friedlander M,
    2. Hancock KC,
    3. Rischin D,
    4. Messing MJ,
    5. Stringer CA,
    6. Matthys GM,
    7. et al.
    A Phase II, open-label study evaluating pazopanib in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2010;119:32–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bois AD,
    2. Floquet A,
    3. Kim JW,
    4. Rau J,
    5. Del Campo JM,
    6. Friedlander M,
    7. et al.
    Randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of pazopanib versus placebo in women who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (AEOC): Results of an international Intergroup trial (AGO-OVAR16).: Gynecologic Cancer 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr LBA5503).
  28. 28.↵
    1. Biagi JJ,
    2. Oza AM,
    3. Chalchal HI,
    4. Grimshaw R,
    5. Ellard SL,
    6. Lee U,
    7. et al.
    A phase II study of sunitinib in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: an NCIC Clinical Trials Group Study. Ann Oncol 2011;22:335–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Matei D,
    2. Sill MW,
    3. Lankes HA,
    4. DeGeest K,
    5. Bristow RE,
    6. Mutch D,
    7. et al.
    Activity of sorafenib in recurrent ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinomatosis: a gynecologic oncology group trial. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:69–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Karlan BY,
    2. Oza AM,
    3. Richardson GE,
    4. Provencher DM,
    5. Hansen VL,
    6. Buck M,
    7. et al.
    Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of AMG 386 combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:362–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Meteoglu I,
    2. Erdogdu IH,
    3. Meydan N,
    4. Erkus M,
    5. Barutca S
    . NF-KappaB expression correlates with apoptosis and angiogenesis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma tissues. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27:53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Xue W,
    2. Meylan E,
    3. Oliver TG,
    4. Feldser DM,
    5. Winslow MM,
    6. Bronson R,
    7. et al.
    Response and resistance to NF-kappaB inhibitors in mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 2011;1:236–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. San Miguel JF,
    2. Schlag R,
    3. Khuageva NK,
    4. Dimopoulos MA,
    5. Shpilberg O,
    6. Kropff M,
    7. et al.
    Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:906–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sugita A,
    2. Ogawa H,
    3. Azuma M,
    4. Muto S,
    5. Honjo A,
    6. Yanagawa H,
    7. et al.
    Antiallergic and anti-inflammatory effects of a novel I kappaB kinase beta inhibitor, IMD-0354, in a mouse model of allergic inflammation. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2009;148:186–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Tanaka A,
    2. Muto S,
    3. Konno M,
    4. Itai A,
    5. Matsuda H
    . A new IkappaB kinase beta inhibitor prevents human breast cancer progression through negative regulation of cell cycle transition. Cancer Res 2006;66:419–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kanduri M,
    2. Tobin G,
    3. Aleskog A,
    4. Nilsson K,
    5. Rosenquist R
    . The novel NF-kappaB inhibitor IMD-0354 induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Cancer J 2011;1:e12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Huang S,
    2. Robinson JB,
    3. Deguzman A,
    4. Bucana CD,
    5. Fidler IJ
    . Blockade of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling inhibits angiogenesis and tumorigenicity of human ovarian cancer cells by suppressing expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin 8. Cancer Res 2000;60:5334–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 14 (4)
April 2015
Volume 14, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IKKβ Regulates VEGF Expression and Is a Potential Therapeutic Target for Ovarian Cancer as an Antiangiogenic Treatment
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
IKKβ Regulates VEGF Expression and Is a Potential Therapeutic Target for Ovarian Cancer as an Antiangiogenic Treatment
Yasuto Kinose, Kenjiro Sawada, Hiroshi Makino, Tomonori Ogura, Tomoko Mizuno, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoyuki Fujikawa, Eiichi Morii, Koji Nakamura, Ikuko Sawada, Aska Toda, Kae Hashimoto, Aki Isobe, Seiji Mabuchi, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Akiko Itai, Ken-ichirou Morishige, Hirohisa Kurachi and Tadashi Kimura
Mol Cancer Ther April 1 2015 (14) (4) 909-919; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0696

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
IKKβ Regulates VEGF Expression and Is a Potential Therapeutic Target for Ovarian Cancer as an Antiangiogenic Treatment
Yasuto Kinose, Kenjiro Sawada, Hiroshi Makino, Tomonori Ogura, Tomoko Mizuno, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoyuki Fujikawa, Eiichi Morii, Koji Nakamura, Ikuko Sawada, Aska Toda, Kae Hashimoto, Aki Isobe, Seiji Mabuchi, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Akiko Itai, Ken-ichirou Morishige, Hirohisa Kurachi and Tadashi Kimura
Mol Cancer Ther April 1 2015 (14) (4) 909-919; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0696
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting BET and PI3K in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma
  • Targeting RRM2, NF-κB, and Mutant TP53 in TNBC
  • ONC201 Exerts Antitumor Activity
Show more Small Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement