Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Small Molecule Therapeutics

Preclinical Characterization of RSM-932A, a Novel Anticancer Drug Targeting the Human Choline Kinase Alpha, an Enzyme Involved in Increased Lipid Metabolism of Cancer Cells

Juan Carlos Lacal and Joaquín M. Campos
Juan Carlos Lacal
1Traslational Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jclacal10@gmail.com
Joaquín M. Campos
2Department of Pharmaceutical and Organic Chemistry, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, Granada, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0531 Published January 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Choline kinase α (CHKA; here designated as ChoKα) is the first enzyme in the CDP-choline pathway, implicated in phospholipids metabolism. It is overexpressed in several human tumors such as breast, lung, bladder, colorectal, prostate, ovary, and liver. The overexpression of ChoKα has oncogenic potential and synergizes with other known oncogenes. It has been proposed as a novel cancer drug target with a distinct mechanism of action. We have generated a set of ChoKα inhibitors with potent in vitro antiproliferative and in vivo antitumoral activity against human xenografts in mice, showing high efficacy with low toxicity profiles. Among these inhibitors, RSM-932A has been chosen for further clinical development due to its potent antiproliferative activity in vitro against a large variety of tumor-derived cell lines, a potent in vivo anticancer activity, and lack of toxicity at the effective doses. Here, we provide the preclinical evidence to support the use of RSM-932A as a good candidate to be tested in clinical trials as the “first in humans” drug targeting ChoKα. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(1); 31–39. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

Choline and related lipid compounds are vital metabolites to maintain cellular homeostasis and to support proliferation of both normal and tumor cells. It is required for the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine (PC), the major phospholipid in eukaryotic membranes, and other phospholipids which are relevant to maintain cell membrane integrity and signal transduction both in normal conditions and disease, including cancer (reviewed in refs. 1–3).

Generation of phosphocholine (PCho) by choline kinase α (ChoKα) is an essential event for growth factor signaling. There are data supporting the role of PCho in malignant transformation as RAS-transformed cell lines show increased ChoK activity and higher PCho levels than their normal counterparts (4). Furthermore, increased activity of ChoKα is observed in a large series of human tumors and tumor-derived cell lines including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, bladder, ovary, liver, and osteosarcomas (5–11), and its activity has been found to be a critical requirement for the proliferation of primary human mammary epithelial cells and breast tumor progression (6, 7, 12). All of this evidence, as well as NMR studies of choline and related compounds in both normal and tumor cells, concludes that abnormal choline metabolism is a metabolic hallmark associated with tumor onset and progression, and further supports the proposal for using ChoKα as a novel therapeutic target and a biomarker for cancer prognosis and treatment (1–3).

Several different molecules were initially used as choline kinase antagonists (1). A successful series of symmetrical bis-quinolinium compounds based on the hemicolinium-3 (HC-3) molecule have been synthesized as inhibitors of ChoKα with promising activity as antiproliferative compounds against tumor-derived cells and as antitumoral drugs in xenografts models (13–20). MN58b, a first-generation ChoKα inhibitor, shows a potent in vitro antiproliferative activity and in vivo antitumoral activity (1, 13, 14). It is highly specific because it demonstrates a differential effect in normal cells versus tumor cells. In primary cells, blocking de novo PCho synthesis by MN58b promotes a reversible cell-cycle arrest at G0–G1 phase. In contrast, ChoK inhibition in tumor cells makes cells unable to arrest in G0–G1 as marked by a deficient pRb dephosphorylation (21, 22). In addition, MN58b has provided strong evidence that it is specific to ChoKα, with no effect in a variety of oncogene-activated signaling pathways (21–23). Furthermore, MN58b showed a much higher specificity against ChoKα1 (IC50 = 5 μmol/L) than against ChoKβ (IC50 = 107.5 μmol/L), this is 21.5 times more potent against ChoKα1 than ChoKβ isoform (24). All these results have been validated by ChoKα-specific RNA-interfering (siRNA) approaches (7, 25–27) and additional small molecules directed toward ChoKα (28–29).

Once the proof-of-principle that ChoKα is a validated target in oncology has been set up, a very intensive activity has been developed for the identification of novel ChoKα inhibitors with potential use as antitumoral drugs (15–20, 28–31) and also as antiparasitic compounds (32, 33).

In humans, there are two genes codifying for ChoK activity, CHKA and CHKB, and three different enzymes, ChoKα1, ChoKα2, and ChoKβ (reviewed in refs. 1, 2). Although ChoKα1 and ChoKα2 are almost identical and are generated by differential splicing from the CHKA gene, ChoKβ, which shares 60% of overall homology, is generated from CHKB. Thus, ChoKβ is a different gene product, and although is able to convert choline into PCho in cell extracts, its main role in living cells seems to be the phosphorylation of ethanolamine to phosphoethanolamine (24). Thus, probably due to this differential biochemical behavior, although ChoKα has been involved in the tumorigenic process, a similar role for ChoKβ in carcinogenesis has not been found (24). Recent evidence further supports the relevance of ChoKα as a bonafide anticancer drug target (34). This makes necessary the identification of specific ChoKα inhibitors as anticancer drugs.

Limited therapeutic outcomes of existing drugs, diverse toxic side effects, along with acquired resistance to multiple drugs, are frequent drawbacks of current cancer therapies. Therefore, there is a clinical need for new and more precise compounds that can specifically inhibit novel selected targets, guaranteeing the continuous improvement in the search for new cancer-targeted drugs, with a higher therapeutic window and less toxicity. Here, we report the preclinical development of RSM-932A as the first-in-man ChoKα inhibitor to enter phase I clinical trials. Compound RSM-932A is a rationally designed targeted agent with a potential for combinatorial treatments in patients with cancer due to its novel mechanism of action.

Materials and Methods

Cell cultures and compound sensitivity assays

All cell lines used in this study were obtained from the ATCC; no authentication was done by the authors. Cells were grown in the recommended growth media by the provider under standard conditions at 37°C, 5% CO2, and 98% humidity. Cells were obtained at the following dates: H1299 and H460 (May 2007), SW780 (August 2007), 769-P, SK-OV-3, OV-Car-3 and Mia.PaCa.2 (February 2008), SAOS-2 and TccSup (March 2008), HepG2, Hep3B2 and HCT-116 (April 2008), SW620 and HT-29 (June 2008), MDA-MB-231 (August 2008), MDA.MB.468 (September 2008), A431 (November 2008), SKMel-28 (January 2009), A-375 (May 2009), U-87 and MCF10-A (July 2009), H510 (October 2009), SkBr-3 (November 2009), T47D (February 2010), J82 (March 2010), HT-1376 (August 2010), DLD-1 (October 2010), and HeLa (November 2011).

For the antiproliferative activity assays, cells were seeded at 10,000 cells (except for SW780 that was seeded at 5,000 cells and H510 at 20,000 cells) per well into 96-well plates (BD, Falcon, Bioscience). Exponentially growing cells for 24 hours were exposed at scalar concentrations (quadruplicates for each concentration) of the compounds for 72 hours. The colorimetric assay MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) is used to assess cell viability. The reaction correlates with absorbance at 595 nm in a VersaMax Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices). The IC50 values of each compound (50% inhibitory concentration of a substance) are quantified by plotting the log OD (optical density) versus log drug concentration.

Three additional parameters of the drug RSM-932A were assessed in tissue cultures cells: GI50 (concentration of the compound that causes 50% growth inhibition with respect to control cells, considering time 0), TGI (concentration of the compound at which the remaining cell number is equivalent to that of time 0), and LC50 (concentration of the compound at which the remaining cell number is 50% equivalent to that of time 0). Twenty-four hours after seeding the cells and before the exposure to the drug, a time zero point was read to calculate these parameters.

Synthesis of compounds

Compounds were synthesized as previously described (15–20, 35). The structure of all the compounds are shown as derivatives of the general structure depicted in Supplementary Fig. S1.

Mouse strains

Swiss immunocompetent mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.) were used for MTD experiments. Athymic nu/nu mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.), CD1 nude mice (Charles River), and BALB/c nude (Charles River) were used for tumor growth studies. All research protocols were approved by the National Centre of Biotechnology (CNB) Ethics Committee and followed the EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments.

Effective dose

The experiments to find the optimal dosis for the in vivo experiment were performed using 4–5 Swiss immunocompetent mice for each dose. Groups of mice were treated with each substance with different concentrations. All compounds were diluted at the same concentration as a stock solution (5 mmol/L) and successive dilutions were done in PBS (1×) for injections. The treatment consists in a daily intraperitoneal injection during 5 days, followed by a 9-day rest and a final cycle of 5-day treatment. During this time, mice were daily observed and any change in behavior, fur, weight, or mobility considered. All toxicity data were recorded, specifying the details of death cases during and at the end of the treatment. Survivor mice were sacrificed and all the organs were fixed for histopathological analysis (data not shown). The effective dose was defined as the highest concentration that induced no deaths after two 5-day treatment cycles. This dose was used for further toxicity and antitumoral activity experiments.

Tumor growth inhibition studies

Six-week-old nude mice were used. Mice were subcutaneously inoculated at lowers flanks with 1 × 106 of HT-29 (human colon adenocarcinoma) cells suspended in 100 μL of serum-free DMEM (Invitrogen) media mixed (1:1) with Matrigel (BD Biosciences). Measurable subcutaneous tumors (∼0.15–0.2 cm3) were randomized to the treatment and control group. Tumor growth was monitored three times per week. Tumors were measured in two dimensions with digital calipers and tumor volume was estimated using the formula of a rational ellipse (D × d2)/2, where D is the length of the long diameter and d is the short one. The body weight of mice was assessed once per week.

At the end of treatment, all animals from each group were sacrificed. All macroscopic abnormalities observed during the dissection were documented. Lungs were perfused with 4% formaldehyde and the rest of the organs post-fixed in the same fixative for at least 24 hours. After fixation, representative samples for each organ were obtained and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 6 μm of thickness of each block of paraffin were cut and stained by the routine hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) method. The histologic material was assessed by an independent experienced pathologist with ample experience in mice pathological analysis (CitoPath S.L.) under a Leica DM LS2 light microscope. Micrographs were taken with a Leica EC3 camera attached to the microscope. Liver sections from mice in the control group showed normal liver histology and described as (−). Liver sections from mice in the treated group showed either no alteration (−), slight changes referred to some binucleated hepatocytes and some with enlarged nuclei (+). Moderate changes include also cleared cytoplasm with a single vacuole (++), and acute changes showed all previously mentioned characteristic plus a diffuse mottling of the cytoplasm (+++).

For intraperitoneal drug administration, the compounds were dissolved every week of treatment at 5 mmol/L and kept protected from light at 4 °C, and successive dilutions were done fresh every day of treatment in sterile PBS. For the intravenous route of administration, RSM-932A was dissolved at 50 mmol/L (100% DMSO, Baker) and successive dilutions were done fresh every day of treatment in sterile 5% dextrose water (Viaflo).

Enzymatic activity assays

Recombinant bacterial extracts, in which it has been introduced the expression of human ChoKα or ChoKβ, were used. The enzymatic reaction in 50 μL total volume contained a constant volume of bacterial extract in the presence of 100 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mmol/L MgCl2, and 10 mmol/L ATP, 200 μmol/L choline and methyl-[14C]-choline, and different concentrations of the drug. The reaction was incubated 30 minutes at 37°C and stopped on ice. The samples were solved by thin layer chromatography (TLC 60A Silica Gel Whatman). The radioactivity corresponding to phosphocholine was quantified with the Cyclone Plus Scanner. Concentration of each compound that produces 50% inhibition was calculated and expressed in μmol/L (IC50).

IHC

Tumors from xenografts grown in athymic mice were dissected and fixed in 4% formaldehyde for at least 24 hours and paraffin embedded and stained by routine H&E methods. IHC was performed on additional sections with the following antibodies; anti-cytokeratin 20, anti-cytokeratin clone MNF116 (ProgenBiotechnik GMBH), anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (Novocastra), and Ki-67 (DAKO) following the manufacturer's instructions. Negative antibody control was done replacing the primary antibody with the antibody diluents. The slides were examined at CitoPath S.L. by a consultant pathologist under a Leica DM LS2 light microscope. Micrographs were taken with a Leica EC3 camera attached to the microscope.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons in tumor volumes between the untreated and treated groups were done using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. Two side P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All calculations were performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc).

Results

Inhibition of specific enzymatic activity of ChoKα and antiproliferative effect in human tumor-derived cells

A battery of designed ChoKα inhibitors previously described (35) was tested for its ability to efficiently blocking the conversion of choline into PCho by the human ChoK-driven enzymatic reaction. To differentiate between the inhibitory activity against ChoKα and ChoKβ, the two human isoforms of choline kinase were expressed in an Escherichia coli bacterial strain that lacks choline kinase activity, thus the observed enzymatic activity is due exclusively to the recombinant-expressed isoform of the human choline kinase. As shown in Table 1, all compounds tested are more specific for ChoKα than for ChoKβ by 6 to 400-fold.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Relative inhibitory potencies for selected inhibitors against the human recombinant ChoKα and ChoKβ enzymes

Subsequently we tested the in vitro ability of these compounds to inhibit cell proliferation using the human colon adenocarcinoma HT-29 cell line as model. Table 2 shows that although the sensitivity varies for some compounds, most of them have good antiproliferative IC50 values maintaining their main features: selective inhibition of the enzymatic activity of ChoKα and potent antiproliferative activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Properties of ChoKα inhibitors

MTD in mice of ChoKα inhibitors

HC-3 is a potent inhibitor of the choline transporter with drastic toxic effects on the cholinergic terminals (36). In the first generation of derivatives, poor tolerated compounds were obtained that, however, were sufficient to display antitumoral activity. Among them, MN58b shows an efficient antitumoral effect in several systems but has a limited therapeutic window (13, 14). The MTD was determined for later experiments in athymic mice. To that end, 4 to 5 mice were tested with increasing concentrations of each compound for 5 consecutive days followed by 9 days rest and a final cycle of a 5-day treatment. Table 2 shows animal survival at the experimental endpoint for the different concentrations tested. All external signs of toxicity (weight loss, behavioral changes, and fur appearance) as well as lethality were recorded and evaluated to choose a safe dose for subsequent experiments whose objective is to find the final active and nontoxic dosage. A safe dose was established for all compounds as shown in Table 2 and used for further experiments as the effective dose.

Tumor growth inhibition by ChoKα inhibitors

On the basis of these toxicity results, compounds were subjected to growth inhibition studies at the specified effective dose. The human colon cancer HT-29 cell line was chosen for tumor growth inhibition studies due to its relative well-differentiated and aggressive phenotype. Mice bearing HT-29-derived tumors were treated intraperitoneally with a daily dose for 5 days, followed by 9 days rest and a second cycle of five consecutive daily treatments. Under these conditions, all the analyzed compounds displayed significant tumor growth inhibitory activity when compared with the tumor growth of the control mice treated with vehicle with RSM-820C, RSM-964A, RSM-932A, and RSM-828B as the most active compounds (Table 2; Fig. 1A). Next, all drugs were tested following a more restrictive treatment schedule consisting on one single injection per week for 4 weeks. Figure 1B and C shows the differences found between the two compounds with the best activity under the more restrictive conditions (RSM-932A and RSM-820C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Efficacy of selected ChoKα inhibitors against the human colon cancer cell line HT-29 xenograft. Athymic nu/nu mice were subcutaneously implanted in both flanks with 1 × 106 HT-29 cells. Tumors were allowed to form for 3 weeks and all drugs indicated in Table 2 were tested at the indicated effective concentrations. Mice were intraperitoneally treated with either vehicle (control) or with the drug, daily for 5 days, followed by a 9-day rest and then another 5 days of treatment. A1, all drugs showed antitumoral effects (46%–69% tumor growth inhibition) except for ACG-416B that showed no activity at the end of the experiment. A2, antitumoral activity in mice treated with the two most potent drugs, RSM-932A (7.5 mg/kg) or RSM-820C (11.2 mg/kg), are depicted. Mice were treated only once a week during 3 weeks with RSM-932A (B), or RSM-820C (C) to select for the most potent drug. The total number of tumors analyzed in each experiment is indicated. D, efficiency of RSM-932A in two different routes of administration. The antitumoral activity in balb/c nude mice was determined by measuring tumor volume in HT-29 cell line xenografts. Mice were treated with two routes of administration: i.p. and i.v. at 3 mg/kg. Both routes were administrated equally, three times per week for a total of 4 weeks. E, ChoK enzymatic activity in control and treated tumors with TCD-717. The enzymatic activity of ChoK was assessed in tumors extracts from intravenously treated mice (n = 10 tumors) with RSM-932A at 3 mg/kg, three times per week during 4 weeks. The 40% of activity inhibition validates the activity of the drug within the tumors.

Data of external toxicity were recorded, and at the end of the treatment, all mice were sacrificed and all organs fixed for histopathology analysis. Table 3 illustrates the antitumor efficacy for each drug as well as the toxicity found in liver, although all main organs were analyzed. No significant organ damage was observed apart from hepatotoxicity that was found in all treatments except for the less aggressive treatment with RSM-932A that showed no liver toxicity while retaining a potent antitumoral activity (77%). Table 3 summarizes toxicity effects for all compounds along with their antitumoral activities. The histologic changes found in liver in all cases but one (RSM-824B) were only moderately different to normal tissue. Compound ACG-416B was not evaluated because of its low effect on tumor growth inhibition. On the basis of all these results, RSM-932A was chosen for further preclinical studies because of its performance with both treatment schedules and its low toxicity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Liver toxicity after treatment with ChoKα inhibitors in mice bearing tumors

RSM-932A activity in tumor xenografts

The tumor growth inhibition of RSM-932A under different conditions of doses (7.5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg), administration routes (intraperitoneal or intravenous), treatment schedule (5 consecutive days, 3 days per week, 2 days per week, 1 day per week), strain of mice (athymic nu/nu, CD1 nude, BALB/c nude), and human tumor xenografts (colon adenocarcinoma HT29, non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) H-460, breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231) is summarized in Table 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Antitumoral activity of RSM-932A in nude mice in different strains, models of xenografts, schedules, concentrations, and durations of treatments

Two routes of administration were compared, intraperitoneal and intravenous RSM-932A was used at 3 mg/kg on a 3 days per week schedule during 4 weeks by either route (Fig. 1D), and the inhibition of tumor growth registered along the duration of the experiment, 25 days. Comparison between both routes of administration versus control mice (n = 19 tumors) rendered similar results for intraperitoneal injections (58.1% inhibition; n = 20 tumors; P ≤ 0.001) and for intravenous administration (62.4% inhibition; n = 19 tumors; P ≤ 0.0002), both statistically significant. Pharmacokinetics assays were performed in parallel to determine the clearance of the drug in the plasma of treated mice comparing intravenous versus intraperitoneal administration, showing comparable clearance in keeping with the observed antitumoral activity (data not shown).

To confirm that the drug was properly delivered to the tumors and exerted its inhibitory action under these experimental conditions, tumors from the intravenous treated mice were surgically removed at the end of the experiment, protein extracts obtained from treated and untreated tumors and ChoK enzymatic activity assayed under standard conditions. A 40% inhibition of the enzymatic activity was assessed in the intravenous treated tumors compared with the untreated tumors (Fig. 1E).

RSM-932A antiproliferative activity determined by in vitro screening

RSM-932A was tested against a wide panel of 27 human cancer cell lines and a nontumorigenic cell line as a control (Table 5) to define the spectrum of its antitumoral activity. Four standard parameters were calculated: IC50, GI50, TGI, and LC50 useful to determine whether it has cytotoxic or cytostatic activity. Results indicate that RSM-932A has a potent antiproliferative activity against most tumor-derived cell lines tested, including those derived from breast, lung, colon, bladder, liver, ovary, bone, cervix, kidney, pancreas, melanoma, and brain tumors, with IC50 in the low, single-digit micromolar range, consistent with a cytotoxic effect.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Panel of human cancer cell lines tested with RSM-932A for 72 hours and determination of IC50, GI50, TGI, and LC50 parameters

Discussion

Preclinical efficacy studies based on mice xenografts are the main strategy to select compounds that will be eventually analyzed to determine pharmacologic safety for further clinical development in humans. The clinical results of agents used in routine cancer therapy demonstrate the importance of the efforts that should be made in preclinical research to reduce superfluous human studies and optimize clinical responses. Selective kinase inhibitors are considered a main division of cancer therapeutics. Therefore, development of new tailored kinase inhibitors into drugs is a priority in cancer research.

HC-3 is a known inhibitor of choline kinase (36). Its target is overexpressed in a variety of tumors that are the main cause of death worldwide (5–11). However, its extremely high toxicity makes it impossible to use it as a pharmacologic anticancer drug (1, 36). The development of HC-3 derivatives as a strategy to develop a potential novel anticancer treatment based on the inhibition of ChoK activity has been a successful strategy initiated in our group (1). Modifications on its structure have been introduced to eliminate the unwanted effects of HC-3 on cholinergic terminals and therefore reduce its high toxicity (13–20). MN58b was selected as the lead compound to further explore its suitability as anticancer drug (13, 14) and to unravel the mechanism of action and consequences of inhibitors of the ChoK enzymatic activity (21–23, 37). Thus, MN58b belongs to a first generation of HC-3 derivatives used as a prototype for the selective inhibition of ChoKα to study its effects in both normal and tumor cells (1). Its effects have been shown to be selective for ChoKα (24) and while inhibiting cell proliferation in normal cells in a reversible manner, treatment of tumor cells induces a drastic metabolic change that triggers apoptosis (21).

ChoKα shares high homology with its isoform ChoKβ, and phoshorylates in vitro choline and ethanolamine into PCho and phosphoethanolamine, respectively. However, in whole cells, ChoKα has the ability to act efficiently as both choline kinase and ethanolamine kinase, whereas ChoKβ has shown only an ethanolamine kinase (24). Although the nature for this differential biochemical function is still not fully understood, it may be the basis whereas ChoKα is involved in tumorigenesis but a similar role for ChoKβ has not yet been found (24). This is the basis for the development of specific ChoKα inhibitors that should not affect ChoKβ because inhibition of both enzymes with same compound may have undesired side effects and nonspecific toxicity in nontumor cells.

Here, we have designed and characterized a set of a second-generation derivatives of the HC-3 structure, and obtained less toxic and better tolerated compounds at more effective doses as tumor growth inhibitors compared with MN58b. Compound RSM-932A was selected because it provided the best experimental results. It behaves in vitro as MN58b, promoting cell-cycle arrest in nontumorigenic cells, and apoptotic cell death in tumor cells (21, 23). Under in vivo conditions, RSM-932A shows no detectable toxicity in mice at highly effective doses with 77% tumor growth inhibition. The results shown here provide a profile for RSM-932A that has made this compound candidate for further clinical studies in humans. Indeed RSM-932A (designated also as TCD-717) has completed a phase I clinical trial as the first ChoKα inhibitor to be tested in humans (38). This assay is a phase I dose-escalation study of TCD-717 in patients with advanced solid tumors. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety of the drug and to determine the MTD and appropriate dose for phase II studies. Secondary objective is to measure the efficacy of TCD-717. A substudy conducted in the MTD confirmation cohort only evaluates the potential correlation between the levels of tumor choline and tumor response to TCD-717, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetics analysis has been performed on patients enrolled in the MTD confirmation cohort. Results of this trial will be released elsewhere.

Cancer research must provide new molecular targets to expand current therapeutic strategies against cancer. Personalized therapies based on individual molecular profiles have proven more efficient, by reducing side effects and improving clinical outcomes (39). ChoKα expression levels have been reported as an independent prognostic biomarker for early-stage NSCLC (40) and for hepatocarcinomas (41). Thus, taking into consideration the status of ChoKα expression levels in the tumor may represent significant and valuable information to treat patients with this novel family of therapeutic tools.

Development of acquired resistance to standard therapies is a major concern nowadays in the management of patients with cancer. Combination of standard chemotherapy with new-targeted drugs represents a new strategy to efficiently and specifically target cancer cells to overcome resistance in some cases, reducing conventional schedules or dosage of the standard therapy (42). In vivo combination studies using ChoKα inhibitors with standard antineoplastic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have proven to be a promising strategy to increase efficacy in colorectal tumors (37) in keeping with previous treatments including ChoKα siRNA downregulation and 5-FU (43). Furthermore, resistance to ChoKα inhibitors is related to an increase of acid ceramidase (ASAH1) expression in lung primary tumors and derived cancer cell lines, making the combination of ChoKα and ASAH1 inhibitors a promising strategy to improve clinical outcome (44). Although these results are consistent with a relationship between interference of ChoKα enzymatic activity by specific inhibitors and their antiproliferative and antitumor activity, several convergent recent findings suggest that other possible mechanisms may be involved in the oncogenic activity of ChoKα. Thus, inhibition of ChoKα expression or its enzymatic activity is related to inhibition of mitogenic signals such as the PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathway (27, 45, 46), and ChoKα has been found to form a functional complex with EGFR (47). Furthermore, the interaction of different inhibitors with the ChoKα enzyme follows diverse mechanisms including both choline competitive and noncompetitive inhibition (30, 33) and as a consequence, may induce differential in vivo outcomes as recently proposed (48). In particular, we have recently demonstrated that RSM-932A induces the degradation of its target ChoKα (23, 33) allowing to test for its specific inhibitory action in treated tumors. Whether ChoKα has alternative roles in the regulation of cell proliferation other than its involvement in phospholipid metabolism is an intriguing question that merits further investigation. Recent interesting findings indicate that ChoK inhibitors induce drastic effects in the regulation of transcription of genes involved in cell-cycle regulation (49) as well as uridine metabolism (37) or endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfold protein regulation (23). These results, along with the very low toxicity profile of RSM-932A found in mice, will allow develop different formulations that may be effective as either oral or intravenous treatments in humans. Pharmacokinetic analysis of treated patients will help clarifying any potential secondary effects due to interaction with additional targets.

Unraveling the relationship between metabolism and deregulation of cell proliferation has allowed finding alternative tumor markers and molecular targets useful to address specific unmet needs in clinical oncology. Here, we demonstrate that RSM-932A (TCD-717) is a potent antiproliferative drug against a broad spectrum of human tumor-derived cell lines. Also, a potent antitumoral activity against xenografts of human tumors from colon, breast, and lung cancer cells has been demonstrated. Thus, RSM-932A has a broad-spectrum antitumoral activity and based on its profile against the large panel of tumor cells analyzed, most likely could be used in many tumor systems with similar efficacy. Different formulations have been tested with DMSO as the most effective solvent. However, due to its intrinsic properties, other solvents required to efficiently dissolve the drug for human assays needed to be developed. RSM-932A has already finished a phase I clinical trial as the first-in-human drug targeting ChoKα. The specific formulations developed will be described when reporting the clinical outcome of the phase I trial.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

J.C. Lacal has ownership interest (including patents) in TCD Pharma SL and CSIC patent (ES200400072; 2004, April 1). No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other author.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: J.C. Lacal, J.M. Campos

Development of methodology: J.C. Lacal

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): J.C. Lacal

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): J.C. Lacal, J.M. Campos

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: J.C. Lacal, J.M. Campos

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): J.C. Lacal

Study supervision: J.C. Lacal, J.M. Campos

Other (design and synthesis of ChoK inhibitors): J.M. Campos

Grant Support

This work was supported by grants (to J.C. Lacal) from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (SAF2008-03750, RD06-0020-0016), Comunidad de Madrid (S2010/BMD-2326), and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (RD12/0036/0019).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the input from Dr. A. Ramírez and the technical assistance of M.A. Ramos, L. García, T. Mondéjar, and P. Cózar.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received June 23, 2014.
  • Revision received September 23, 2014.
  • Accepted October 21, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lacal JC
    . Choline kinase: a novel target to search for antitumoral drugs. IDrugs 2001;4:419–26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wu G,
    2. Vance DE
    . Choline kinase and its function. Biochem Cell Biol 2010;88:559–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Glunde K,
    2. Bhujwalla ZM,
    3. Ronen SM
    . Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:835–48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lacal JC,
    2. Moscat J,
    3. Aaronson SA
    . Novel source of 1,2-diacylglycerol elevated in cells transformed by Ha-ras oncogene. Nature 1987;330:269–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ramírez de Molina A,
    2. Rodríguez-González A,
    3. Gutiérrez R,
    4. Martínez-Piñeiro L,
    5. Sánchez JJ,
    6. Bonilla F,
    7. et al.
    Overexpression of choline kinase is a frequent feature in human tumor-derived cell lines and in lung, prostate and colorectal human cancers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;296:580–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ramírez de Molina A,
    2. Gutiérrez R,
    3. Ramos MA,
    4. Silva JM,
    5. Silva J,
    6. Bonilla F,
    7. et al.
    Increased choline kinase activity in human breast carcinomas: clinical evidence for a potential novel antitumoral strategy. Oncogene 2002;21:4317–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Glunde K,
    2. Raman V,
    3. Mori N,
    4. Bhujwalla ZM
    . RNA interference-mediated choline kinase suppression in breast cancer cells induces differentiation and reduces proliferation. Cancer Res 2005;65:11034–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Iorio E,
    2. Mezzanzanica D,
    3. Alberti P,
    4. Spadaro F,
    5. Ramoni C,
    6. D'Ascenzo S,
    7. et al.
    Alterations of choline phospholipid metabolism in ovarian tumor progression. Cancer Res 2005;65:9369–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hernando E,
    2. Sarmentero-Estrada J,
    3. Koppie T,
    4. Belda-Iniesta C,
    5. Ramírez de Molina V,
    6. Cejas P,
    7. et al.
    A critical role for choline kinase-alpha in the aggressiveness of bladder carcinomas. Oncogene 2009;28:2425–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Iorio E,
    2. Ricci A,
    3. Bagnoli M,
    4. Pisanu ME,
    5. Castellano G,
    6. Di Vito M,
    7. et al.
    Activation of phosphatidylcholine cycle enzymes in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res 2010;70:2126–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Wu G,
    3. van der Veen JN,
    4. Hermansson M,
    5. Vance DE
    . Phosphatidylcholine metabolism and choline kinase in human osteoblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014;1841:859–67.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ramírez de Molina A,
    2. Báñez-Coronel M,
    3. Gutiérrez R,
    4. Rodríguez-González A,
    5. Olmeda D,
    6. Megías D,
    7. et al.
    Choline kinase activation is a critical requirement for the proliferation of primary human mammary epithelial cells and breast tumor progression. Cancer Res 2004;64:6732–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hernández-Alcoceba R,
    2. Saniger L,
    3. Campos J,
    4. Núñez MC,
    5. Khaless F,
    6. Gallo MA,
    7. et al.
    Choline kinase inhibitors as a novel approach for antiproliferative drug design. Oncogene 1997;15:2289–2301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hernández-Alcoceba R,
    2. Fernández F,
    3. Lacal JC
    . In vivo antitumoral activity of choline kinase inhibitors: a novel target for anticancer drug discovery. Cancer Res 1999;59:3112–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Campos J,
    2. Núñez MC,
    3. Rodríguez V,
    4. Entrena A,
    5. Hernández-Alcoceba R,
    6. Fernández F,
    7. et al.
    LUMO Energy of model compounds as an index for the inhibition of choline kinase: chemical meaning. Eur J Med Chem 2001;36:215–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Campos JM,
    2. Núñez MC,
    3. Sánchez RM,
    4. Gómez-Vidal JA,
    5. Rodríguez-González A,
    6. Báñez M,
    7. et al.
    Quantitative structure-activity relationships for a series of symmetrical bisquaternary anticancer compounds. Bioorg Med Chem 2002;10:2215–31
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Campos J,
    2. Núñez MC,
    3. Conejo-García A,
    4. Sánchez-Martín RM,
    5. Hernández-Alcoceba R,
    6. Rodríguez-González A,
    7. et al.
    QSAR-Derived choline kinase inhibitors: how rational can antiproliferative drug design be? Curr Med Chem 2003;10:1095–1112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Conejo-García A,
    2. Campos J,
    3. Sánchez RM,
    4. Rodríguez-González A,
    5. Lacal JC,
    6. Gallo MA,
    7. et al.
    Choline kinase inhibitory effect and antiproliferative activity of new 1,1′,1″-(benzene-1,3,5-triylmethylene)tris{4-[(disubstituted)amino]pyridinium} tribromides. Eur J Med Chem 2003;38:109–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Conejo-García A,
    2. Báñez-Coronel M,
    3. Sánchez-Martín RM,
    4. Rodríguez-González A,
    5. Ramos A,
    6. Ramírezde Molina A,
    7. et al.
    Influence of the Linker in the Human Choline Kinase Inhibition of Bispyridium Compounds. J Med Chem 2004;47:5433–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sánchez-Martín R,
    2. Campos JM,
    3. Conejo-García A,
    4. Cruz-López O,
    5. Báñez-Coronel M,
    6. Rodríguez-González A,
    7. et al.
    Symmetrical bis-quinoliniumcompounds: new human choline kinase inhibitors with antiproliferative activity against the HT-29 cell line. J Med Chem 2005;48:3354–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rodríguez-González A,
    2. Ramírez de Molina A,
    3. Fernández F,
    4. Lacal JC
    . Choline kinase inhibition induces the increase in ceramides resulting in a highly specific and selective cytotoxic antitumoral strategy as a potential mechanism of action. Oncogene 2004;23:8247–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Rodríguez-González A,
    2. Ramírez de Molina A,
    3. Báñez-Coronel M,
    4. Megías D,
    5. Núñez MC,
    6. Lacal JC
    . Inhibition of choline kinase renders a highly selective cytotoxic effect in tumor cells through a mitochondrial independent mechanism. Int J Oncol 2005;26:999–1008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sánchez-López E,
    2. Menchén LE,
    3. Seco E,
    4. Gómez del Pulgar T,
    5. Moyer MP,
    6. Lacal Sanjuan JC,
    7. et al.
    Endoplasmic reticulum stress participates in the cytotoxic effect of choline kinase α inhibitors in tumor cells. Cell Death Dis 2013;4:e933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Gallego-Ortega D,
    2. Ramírez de Molina A,
    3. Ramos MA,
    4. Bardera MG,
    5. Valdés F,
    6. Sarmentero-Estrada J,
    7. et al.
    Differential role of choline kinase alpha and beta isoforms in human carcinogenesis. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e7819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Báñez-Coronel M,
    2. Ramírez de Molina A,
    3. Rodríguez-González A,
    4. Sarmentero J,
    5. Ramos MA,
    6. García-Cabezas MA,
    7. et al.
    Choline kinase alpha depletion selectively kills tumoral cells. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2008;8:709–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nimmagadda S,
    2. Glunde K,
    3. Pomper MG,
    4. Bhujwalla ZM
    . Pharmacodynamic markers for choline kinase down-regulation in breast cancer cells. Neoplasia 2009;11:477–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Yalcin A,
    2. Clem B,
    3. Makoni S,
    4. Clem AL,
    5. Nelson K,
    6. Thornburg J,
    7. et al.
    Selective inhibition of choline kinase simultaneously attenuates MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling. Oncogene 2010;29:139–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Clem BF,
    2. Clem AL,
    3. Yalcin A,
    4. Goswami U,
    5. Arumugam S,
    6. Telang S,
    7. et al.
    A novel small molecule antagonist of choline kinase-α that simultaneously suppresses MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling. Oncogene 2011;30:3370–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sahún-Roncero M,
    2. Rubio-Ruiz B,
    3. Saladino G,
    4. Conejo-García A,
    5. Espinosa A,
    6. Velázquez Campoy A,
    7. et al.
    The mechanism of allosteric coupling in choline kinase α1 revealed by the action of a rationally designed inhibitor. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013;52:4582–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hudson CS,
    2. Knegtel RM,
    3. Brown K,
    4. Charlton PA
    . Kinetic and mechanistic characterization of Choline Kinase-α. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1834:1107–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Trousil S,
    2. Carroll L,
    3. Kalusa A,
    4. Aberg O,
    5. Kaliszczak M,
    6. Aboagye EO
    . Design of symmetrical and nonsymmetrical N,N-dimethylamino pyridine derivatives as highly potent choline kinase alpha inhibitors. Med. Chem. Commun 2013;4:693–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Choubey V,
    2. Maity P,
    3. Guha M,
    4. Kumar S,
    5. Srivastava K,
    6. Puri SK,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum choline kinase by hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide: a possible antimalarial mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:696–706.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Zimmerman T,
    2. Moneriz C,
    3. Diez A,
    4. Bautista JM,
    5. Gómez del Pulgar T,
    6. Cebrián A,
    7. Lacal JC
    . RSM-932A is a promising synergistic inhibitor of the choline kinase of plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:5878–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Gruber J,
    2. See Too WC,
    3. Wong MT,
    4. Lavie A,
    5. McSorley T,
    6. Konrad M
    . Balance of human choline kinase isoforms is critical for cell cycle regulation. Implications for the development of choline kinase-targeted cancer therapy. FEBS J 2012;279:1915–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lacal Sanjuán JC,
    2. Campos Rosa J,
    3. Gallo Mezo MA,
    4. Espinosa Úbeda A,
    5. inventors
    ; CSIC and Universidad de Granada, Spain, assignees. Derivatives of pyridine and quinoline. ES200400072 2004 April 1.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cannon JG
    . Structure-activity aspects of hemicholinium-3 (HC-3) and its analogs and congeners. Med Res Rev 1994;14:505–531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. de la Cueva A,
    2. Ramírez de Molina A,
    3. Álvarez-Ayerza N,
    4. Ramos MA,
    5. Cebrián A,
    6. Del Pulgar TG,
    7. et al.
    Combined 5-FU and ChoKα inhibitors as a new alternative therapy of colorectal cancer: evidence in human tumor-derived cell lines and mouse xenografts. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e64961.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Study of Intravenous TCD-717 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01215864. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01215864.
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ellis LM,
    2. Hicklin DJ
    . Resistance to Targeted Therapies: Refining Anticancer Therapy in the Era of Molecular Oncology. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:7471–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Ramírez de Molina A,
    2. Sarmentero-Estrada J,
    3. Belda-Iniesta C,
    4. Taron M,
    5. Ramírez de Molina V,
    6. Cejas P,
    7. et al.
    Expression of choline kinase alfa to predict outcome in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:889–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kwee SA,
    2. Hernández B,
    3. Chan O,
    4. Wong L
    . Choline kinase alpha and hexokinase-2 protein expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: association with survival. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e46591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Goteti K,
    2. Garner CE,
    3. Utley L,
    4. Dai J,
    5. Ashwell S,
    6. Moustakas DT,
    7. et al.
    Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to predict synergistic effects of co-administered anti-cancer agents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010;66:245–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Mori N,
    2. Glunde K,
    3. Takagi T,
    4. Raman V,
    5. Bhujwalla ZM
    . Choline kinase down-regulation increases the effect of 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2007;67:11284–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Ramírez de Molina A,
    2. de la Cueva A,
    3. Machado-Pinilla R,
    4. Rodríguez-Fanjul V,
    5. Gómez del Pulgar T,
    6. Cebrián A,
    7. et al.
    Acid ceramidase as a chemotherapeutic target to overcome resistance to the antitumoral effect of choline kinase α inhibition. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2012;12:617–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Chua BT,
    2. Gallego-Ortega D,
    3. Ramírez de Molina A,
    4. Ullrich A,
    5. Lacal JC,
    6. Downward J
    . Regulation of Akt(ser473) phosphorylation by Choline kinase in breast carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer 2009, 8:131–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Al-Saffar NMS,
    2. Jackson LE,
    3. Reynaud FI,
    4. Workman P,
    5. Ramírez de Molina A,
    6. Lacal JC,
    7. et al.
    The novel phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase inhibitor PI103 downregulates choline kinase resulting in phosphocholine depletion detected by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Cancer Res 2010;70:5507–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Miyake T,
    2. Parsons SJ
    . Functional interactions between choline kinase-α, epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Src in breast cancer cell proliferation. Oncogene 2012;31:1431–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Falcon SC,
    2. Hudson CS,
    3. Huang Y,
    4. Mortimore M,
    5. Golec JM,
    6. Charlton PA,
    7. et al.
    A non-catalytic role of choline kinase alpha is important in promoting cancer cell survival. Oncogenesis 2013;2:e38.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Ramírez de Molina A,
    2. Gallego-Ortega D,
    3. Sarmentero-Estrada J,
    4. Lagares D,
    5. Gómez del Pulgar T,
    6. Bandrés E,
    7. et al.
    Choline kinase as a link connecting phospholipid metabolism and cell cycle regulation: implications in cancer therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008;40:1753–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 14 (1)
January 2015
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical Characterization of RSM-932A, a Novel Anticancer Drug Targeting the Human Choline Kinase Alpha, an Enzyme Involved in Increased Lipid Metabolism of Cancer Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preclinical Characterization of RSM-932A, a Novel Anticancer Drug Targeting the Human Choline Kinase Alpha, an Enzyme Involved in Increased Lipid Metabolism of Cancer Cells
Juan Carlos Lacal and Joaquín M. Campos
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2015 (14) (1) 31-39; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0531

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preclinical Characterization of RSM-932A, a Novel Anticancer Drug Targeting the Human Choline Kinase Alpha, an Enzyme Involved in Increased Lipid Metabolism of Cancer Cells
Juan Carlos Lacal and Joaquín M. Campos
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2015 (14) (1) 31-39; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0531
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • eFT226, a Selective Inhibitor of eIF4A-Mediated Translation
  • Peptide Inhibiting Breast Cancer by Disrupting SND1–MTDH
  • TTC-352 Pharmacology and Mechanisms to Treat Breast Cancer
Show more Small Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement