Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction

Midkine Lacking Its Last 40 Amino Acids Acts on Endothelial and Neuroblastoma Tumor Cells and Inhibits Tumor Development

Noushin Dianat, Barbara Le Viet, Emilie Gobbo, Nathalie Auger, Ivan Bièche, Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli and Frank Griscelli
Noushin Dianat
1INSERM U745, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Le Viet
1INSERM U745, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilie Gobbo
2INSERM U935, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Core Facility, Villejuif, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Auger
3Départements de Biologie et Pathologie Médicale, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan Bièche
4Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique, Institut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, St-Cloud, France.
5Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli
2INSERM U935, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Core Facility, Villejuif, France.
6Université Paris-Sud 11, Campus Orsay, Orsay, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Griscelli
2INSERM U935, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Core Facility, Villejuif, France.
3Départements de Biologie et Pathologie Médicale, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
5Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: franck.griscelli@igr.fr
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0226 Published January 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Midkine (MDK) is a member of a new family of neurotrophic factors considered as rate-limiting growth and angiogenic factors implicated in the onset, invasion, and metastatic process of neuronal tumors, including neuroblastoma. We showed that all neuroblastoma cell lines highly expressed MDK, indicating that it is a critical player in tumor development, which may henceforth represent an attractive therapeutic target. We showed that the knockdown of MDK expression by siRNA led to a marked and significant decrease in neuroblastoma (IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y) cell proliferation in vitro. Using a new strategy, we then evaluated the antitumor effect of a truncated MDK protein, lacking the C-terminal 81–121 portion of the molecule (MDKΔ81-121), which may act as a dominant-negative effector for its mitogenic, angiogenic, and tumorigenic activities by heterodimerizing with the wild-type protein. In vitro studies showed that MDKΔ81-121 selectively inhibited MDK-dependent tumor cells and was able to strongly reduce endothelial cell proliferation and migration and to induce ER stress–mediated apoptosis. We then investigated the effects of MDKΔ81-121 in vivo using electrotransfer of a plasmid encoding a secretable form of MDKΔ81-121 into tibialis cranialis muscles of nude mice. We showed that MDKΔ81-121 dramatically inhibited (up to 91%) tumor development and growth. This inhibition was correlated with the detection of the MDKΔ81-121 molecule in plasma and the suppression of intratumor neovascularization. Our findings demonstrate that MDK inhibition is a tractable therapeutic target for this lethal pediatric malignancy. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(1); 213–24. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

Over the last decade, a number of new antiangiogenic agents have demonstrated their ability to retard tumor growth, and some of them are physiologic angiostatic factors that are derived upon proteolytic cleavage of native proteins. In this field, we previously evaluated antiangiogenesis and antitumor activities of a 38-kDa internal fragment of plasminogen, a 24-kDa noncollagenous domain of collagen type IV α-chains, and a 20-kDa fragment of collagen XVIII, called, respectively, angiostatin, canstatin, and endostatin (1–3). All these fragments are known to silence cytokine-induced angiogenesis pathways by binding to integrin receptors and triggering mitochondrial apoptosis (4–6). They specifically target endothelial cells, do not possess antineoplastic activities and should therefore be administered in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy to achieve a major clinical response (4, 7, 8). Thus, the development of new anticancer strategies targeting both endothelial and neoplastic compartments should be advantageous. In this field, we already designed truncated proteins that are dominant-negative effectors of native growth factors specific to endothelial and tumor cell proliferation. They are capable of silencing the native protein by forming inactive heterodimeric molecules (9). In particular, we demonstrated that a truncated Pleiotrophin (PTN), lacking the C-terminal 111–136 portion of the molecule (PTNΔ111-136), acted as a dominant-negative mutant that selectively inhibited in vitro the proliferation of a PTN-dependent MDA-MB-231 breast tumor and endothelial cells by silencing the VEGF-A and HIF1α pathways and breast tumor growth in vivo by 81% (10).

In the current study, we assessed the antiangiogenesis and antitumor activities of a new dominant-negative mutant derived from the Midkine (MDK) growth factor. MDK is a 121 amino acid protein that like PTN belongs to the heparin-binding growth factor (HBGF) family and is constitutively active when it forms homodimers that are stabilized by heparin (11). Although MDK is composed of two major N- and C-terminal domains held together by disulfide linkages, most protein activities are performed by C-terminal domain. That is the case of the lysine-rich domain of PTN 111-136 C-terminal residues, which is required for its mitogenic and tumorigenic activities (12). MDK was identified as the ligand of different tyrosine kinase receptors such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), as well as the receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase (RPTP) and the LDL-receptor–related protein families (LRP; refs. 13–15). Through these interactions, MDK is involved in important cellular functions, promoting the growth of tumor cell lines (16) and cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis (17) and was shown to promote tumor angiogenesis (18). In particular, MDK was shown to correlate with tumor progression and invasiveness of neuroblastoma. Indeed, plasma MDK levels were found to be significantly correlated with the status of N-myc amplification, TRKA expression, and stage, which are known prognostic factors in neuroblastoma (19). In this study, we assessed the effects of the 81-121 deleted MDK (MDKΔ81-121) lacking its last 40 amino acids, and for the first time, demonstrate that this truncated protein could act as a potent inhibitor of tumor growth and angiogenesis in a neuroblastoma tumor model.

Materials and Methods

Plasmid DNA

The pcDNA3-LacZ control plasmid encoding β-galactosidase was constructed as previously described (10). The pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121-MycHis plasmid was obtained by cloning the MDKΔ81-121 fragment between the BamHI and the EcoRI sites of the pcDNA3.1(+)/myc-HisA plasmid (Invitrogen). All plasmids were purified using endofree Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen), and solubilized in endotoxin-free 0.9% NaCl.

Cell culture and conditioned medium

Human neuroblastoma cell lines KCNR, CLB-PE, LAN-1, and GIMen were a kind gift of Dr. Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey (Inserm U830, Institut Curie, Paris, France; ref. 20). The human IGR-N91 cell line was a kind gift of Dr. Bénard (CNRS UMR 8126, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) and was established from an infiltrated bone marrow collected from a stage IV neuroblastoma (21). These neuroblastoma cell lines as well as SK-N-AS (ATCC CRL2137), SH-SY5Y (ATCC CRL2266), and BE(2)-M17 (ATCC CRL2267), MRC-5 cell line (ATCC CCL-171) and monkey Cos7 cells (ATCC CRL1651) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Human umbilical smooth muscle cells (SMC) were a kind gift of Dr. Georges Uzan (INSERM U972, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France) and were isolated and characterized as described previously (22). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC, Lonza CC-2517) and SMCs were cultured in their adequate medium from Lonza and promocell, respectively (10). Experiments involving ATCC or Lonza cell lines were mostly performed in the same year they were purchased. Authors performed no authentification on the cell lines used in this article. To obtain Cos7-MDKΔ81-121 and Cos7-LacZ cells, Cos7 cells were transfected with 8 μg of either pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121 or pcDNA3-LacZ plasmids, using jetPEI reagent (Polyplus Transfection). The medium was changed 4 hours after transfection and stably transfected cells were selected with Geneticin/G-418 (700 μg/mL; Invitrogen). After 2 weeks of culture, single cells were added to a 96-well cell culture plate for subcloning and expanded in presence of G-418. Conditioned medium was harvested, aliquoted, and stored at −20°C until use.

Small interfering RNA

IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cells were seeded in 24-well tissue culture dishes, at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well in the appropriate medium. After 24 hours, MDK siRNA (SI02663059; Qiagen) alone or in combination with PTN siRNA (SI00043764; Qiagen) and scrambled siRNA (control) were added at a final concentration of 10 nmol/L. Three days after transfection, cells were collected for real-time RT-PCR, or were used to perform proliferation assay. Cell supernatants were harvested and stored at −20°C for an ELISA assay.

Western blot analysis, ELISA, and FISH

Samples protein concentration was quantified using Dc Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). PTN expression in neuroblastoma cell pellets was assessed as previously described (10). For MDK detection in cell pellets by Western blot analysis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Pall) that was blocked in PBS 0.2% Tween and 5% powdered milk. Membranes were then probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-MDK antibody (1:5,000; American Antigenix). Swain anti-rabbit peroxidase-linked antibody (1:1,000; Dako) was used as secondary antibody. ALK Western blot was performed as previously described (10). For the RPTPβ/ζ Western blot analysis, the protein was detected using a primary rat anti-RPTPβ/ζ antibody (1:500, R&D Systems), and a secondary anti-rat antibody. Actin was detected with monoclonal anti–α-actin peroxidase conjugate antibody (1:50,000). MDK expression in cell supernatants was quantified by an ELISA assay using a Human Midkine Construction Kit (America antigenix), according to manufacturer's instructions. FISH was performed using the Vysis LSI ALK (2q23) dual color, break-apart rearrangement probe (Abbott Molecular).

Real-time RT-PCR

The theoretical and practical aspects of real-time quantitative RT-PCR using the ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) as well as the RNA extraction method, cDNA synthesis, and PCR conditions, were described in detail elsewhere (10). Target gene expression was normalized relative to an endogenous RNA control (TBP gene, which encodes the TATA box-binding protein), as previously described (10).

Virus construction and infection

AdMDKΔ81-121 is a ΔE1–ΔE3 recombinant adenovirus that expresses the truncated protein MDKΔ81-121 lacking the last 40 amino acids. The MDKΔ81-121 fragment was retrieved from pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121 by digestion with AflII and AvrII and inserted into the pCA350 shuttle plasmid. The recombinant adenoviral genome (Ad5ΔE1E3) encoding the truncated protein was generated by homologous recombination between plasmids pCA350 and pOSE1700 in competent E. coli JM83 (ATCC 35607). After recombination, the adenoviral genome was excised by PacI and the AdMDKΔ81-121 virus was obtained by transfecting 293 cells (CRL-1573; ATCC) using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). Recombinant adenovirus expressing no transgene (AdCO1) was used as negative control. Recombinant viruses were expanded in 293 cells and purified by two-step CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation. Viral stocks were desalted using G50 columns (Pharmacia), frozen, and preserved at −80°C in PBS 10% glycerol. Viral titer was quantified as plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL following infection of 293 cells and infection was carried out with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 PFU per cell.

Proliferation assay

Human neuroblastoma cell lines IGR-N91, SH-SY5Y, and HUVEC were seeded in 24-well tissue culture dishes at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well in complete media. After 24 hours, the medium was replaced by 420 μL of conditioned medium Cos7 containing MDKΔ81-121, and 420μL of medium containing 1% or 5% of FBS, respectively, for neuroblastoma and endothelial cell lines. The culture medium was refreshed every 24 hours over 4 days, and cell survival was then quantified by a cell proliferation assay using MTT (0.5 mg/mL), as previously described (10). IGR-N91, SH-SY5Y, MRC-5 cell lines, HUVECs, and SMCs were transduced with AdMDKΔ81-121 or AdCO1 used as control and after 4 days cell proliferation was performed as previously described (10).

Coculture of SMCs and HUVECs

A endothelial SMC coculture experiment was performed as previously described, using the 24-well Transwell culture plates (0.4 μm pore size, Corning; ref. 23). Briefly, SMCs were seeded in 24-well culture plates at 5 × 104 cell density per well, infected with 200 MOI of AdMDKΔ81-121 and cultured during 24 hours with DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS. Then, HUVECs were seeded onto the culture inserts at a density of 2.0 × 105 cells per well and cultured with DMEM supplemented with 5% of FBS. A total of 100 ng/mL of MDK was added or not to the medium. After 48 hours, a MTT assay was performed to quantify the endothelial cell proliferation.

Endothelial tube formation assay

Two-hundred microliters of growth factor–reduced Matrigel (8 mg/mL; BD Biosciences) was added to a 48-well tissue culture dish and was polymerized during 1 hour at 37°C. HUVEC cells were then seeded at a density of 6 × 104 cells per well in 250 μL of EBM-2 1% FBS and 100 or 250 μL of conditioned medium (control or MDKΔ81-121 medium). After 18 hours of incubation under normal culture conditions, the capillary-like structures were stained with Giemsa and the length of networks was quantified under phase-contrast microscopy, using Archimed and Videomat softwares (GT Vision).

Plasmid electrotransfer

Before the electrotransfer procedure, 6-week-old female athymic mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine (Ketalar, Panpharma), and 40 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun, Bayer). Forty micrograms of pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121 or pcDNA3-LacZ plasmids was resuspended in 30 μL sterile 0.9% normal saline and injected in both tibialis cranialis muscles of mice using a Hamilton syringe. The electrotransfer was performed with a Cliniporator system (IGEA), as previously described (10).

Tumor cell inoculation

IGR-N91 cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in sterile 0.9% normal saline at a concentration of 10 × 106 cells in 100 μL and were injected subcutaneously into the athymic mice, 7 days after plasmid electrotransfer. The tumor size was monitored after 41 days by measuring the largest (a) and the longest (b) tumor diameters and the tumor volume was calculated using the following formula: [(a+b)/2]3 × π/6. Mice were sacrificed using a lethal dose of isofluorane: for each mouse, the electrotransferred muscles and the tumor were collected and stored under appropriate conditions for a further immunohistochemical analysis. Serum was collected at day 41 for the quantification of MDKΔ81-121 by a specific ELISA.

Immunohistochemistry and image analysis

After mice were sacrificed, muscles and tumors were collected and fixed in FineFix (Milestone). Paraffin sections of IGR-N91 tumor cells were prepared to quantify the number of intratumoral vessels by CD31 immunostaining, as well as Ki67, caspase-3, and SMA immunostaining, as previously described (4, 10). Images of histologic slides were recorded with a Nikon SuperCoolscan 8000 ED scanner, and analyzed with the PixCyt image analysis software. Paraffin sections of electroporated muscle were stained for the detection of β-galactosidase and MDKΔ81-121, as previously described (10).

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was done at least twice. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Student t test (unilateral and unpaired).

Results

Expression of MDK, PTN, and their receptors

To analyze the expression of MDK and PTN in neuroblastoma cell lines (KCNR, SK-N-AS, BE(2)-M17, CLB-PE, LAN-1, SH-SY5Y, GIMen, and IGR-N91), we first quantified endogenous MDK and PTN mRNA expression by real-time RT-PCR. We showed that MDK and PTN mRNAs were detected in all of the 8 cell lines and that MDK mRNA level was significantly higher (P = 0.039) than PTN mRNA (Fig. 1A). Indeed, in five cell lines (KCNR, CLB-PE, LAN-1, SH-SY5Y, and IGR-N91) MDK mRNA was 3.5- to 11-fold higher than PTN mRNA. To study MDK protein expression after 48 hours of culture, cell supernatants and cell extracts were analyzed using ELISA and Western blot, respectively. Secretion of MDK in the culture media was demonstrated for all the cell lines (Fig. 1B). The IGR-N91 cell line was found to produce and secrete the highest level of MDK and was also found to produce a high level of MDK mRNA (Fig. 1A and B). Furthermore, immunoreactive MDK protein was also detected at a high level in IGR-N91 cell extracts that also expressed a low level of PTN compared with other cell lines (Fig. 1C and D). All these results clearly showed heterogeneous expression of MDK and PTN in all the cell lines tested and that IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines appeared to produce and secrete high levels of MDK certainly contributing to their proliferation.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

In vitro assessment of MDK and PTN expression. A, PTN and MDK mRNA expression by real-time quantitative RT-PCR in tumor cell line lysates in 8 different neuroblastoma cell lines. B, quantitative detection of MDK by ELISA in the supernatants of 8 different neuroblastoma cell lines. C, Western blot analysis of MDK in cell pellets from eight different neuroblastoma cell lines compared with positive control protein (MDK). D, Western blot analysis of PTN in cell pellets from different neuroblastoma cell lines compared with positive control protein (PTN).

To evaluate the potential contribution of HBGH signaling, we then studied the expression of its receptors (ALK, RPTPs, and LRPs) using quantitative RT-PCR. Table 1 shows that ALK mRNA was present in all neuroblastoma cell lines tested with clear heterogeneity of expression as 5 of 8 cell lines (KCNR, BE(2)-M17, CLB-PE, LAN-1, SH-SY5Y) expressed higher levels of ALK mRNA. Our results were confirmed by Western blot analysis showing the presence of two ALK isoforms, a 220-kDa native transmembrane protein and a 140-kDa cleaved soluble ALK (Fig. 2A). We then focused on the ALK gene to verify whether there was a correlation between ALK protein expression and possible somatic amplification of the ALK genomic locus. No gene amplification (<5 copies) was found in IGR-N91 (Fig. 2C) and SH-SY5Y (Fig. 2D). Moreover, the level of ALK expression was not strongly correlated with the N-myc status as SH-SY5Y (not amplified for N-myc) and IGR-N91 (amplified for N-myc), respectively, expressed high and low ALK levels. The second well-known HBGH receptor, RPTPβ/ζ, was also detected by RT-PCR (Table 1) and Western blot analysis (Fig. 2B) in all cell lines at the same levels and thus seemed to be highly ubiquitous in all cell lines tested. Concerning other RPTP isoforms and LRP receptors, all the neuroblastoma cell lines exhibited RPTPS, RPTPA, RPTPD, and LRP6 mRNA. Some cell lines expressed LRP1B but none of the cells expressed LRP2 (Table 1).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

In vitro assessment of MDK receptors expression. A, immunoblots of ALK in various neuroblastoma cell lines. B, immunoblots of RPTPβ/ζ in various neuroblastoma cell lines. C and D, FISH was performed on interphase nuclei from IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cultured lines. We used 2 probes (Vysis LSI ALK Dual Color, Abbott Molecular) specific for the 2p23 chromosomal region (SHGC-56576 spectrum orange, SHGC-104192 spectrum green), showing two signals for each probe in all the cells analyzed corresponding to the presence of the ALK chromosome region.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Real-time RT-PCR analysis of ALK, RPTPs, and LRPs mRNA, P53 mutation, and N-myc amplification status in 8 different neuroblastoma cell lines

In vitro expression and functional characterization of MDKΔ81-121

To determine whether MDK is functionally relevant in neuroblastoma models and thus might represent a tractable therapeutic target, we examined the consequences of disrupting MDK signaling by mRNA knockdown. We transiently transfected siRNAs directed against MDK alone or in combination with PTN-targeted siRNAs into two neuroblastoma cell lines expressing high levels of MDK (IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y) and screened growth inhibition. We first demonstrated knockdown of the mRNA and protein in these two cell lines. The MDK mRNA level was undetectable in IGR-N91 cell line and was inhibited by 80% in SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 3A). MDK-specific siRNA induced a drastic decrease in the secretion of endogenous MDK compared with cells transfected with scrambled control siRNA. The combination of MDK- and PTN-specific siRNAs reduced the MDK secretion to the same level as the cells transfected with MDK siRNA alone (Fig. 3B). To evaluate the consequence of MDK suppression on cell proliferation, we performed a proliferation assay on the cells transfected with MDK-specific siRNA alone or in combination with PTN siRNA, after 4 days of culture. Both cell lines showed significant inhibition of proliferation to MDK knockdown (Fig. 3C). The proliferation of IGR-N91 cells was inhibited by 34% (P < 2 × 10−5) and of SH-SY5Y by 15% (P < 0.01) with MDK siRNA alone. The additive inhibitory effect of PTN siRNA on neuroblastoma cell proliferation compared with MDK siRNA alone was not significant (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Transfection of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines by siRNAs directed against MDK, PTN, or nonsilencing sequence siRNAs (control) and Cos7 cells by pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121-MycHis or pcDNA3-LacZ plasmids. A, real-time RT-PCR expression of MDK mRNA, 4 days after the transfection of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines with 10 nmol/L siRNAs targeting MDK alone or in combination with PTN-targeted siRNAs and with nonsilencing sequence siRNAs. B, quantitative detection of MDK by ELISA in the supernatant of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines transfected with siRNAs directed against MDK alone or in combination with PTN siRNAs or nonsilencing sequence siRNAs after 4 days of culture. C, siRNAs directed against MDK induced inhibition of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines proliferation compared with the transfection of nonsilencing siRNAs. PTN-targeted siRNA did not induced any significant additive effect on proliferation of neuroblastoma cell lines when transfected in combination with MDK-targeted siRNAs; NS, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005. D, quantification of MDKΔ81-121 in the supernatant of Cos7-transfected cells by ELISA. Cos7 cells were transfected with 8 μg of either pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121 or pcDNA3-LacZ plasmids and subclones were expanded. Supernatants of 26 different Cos7-MDKΔ81-121 subclones were tested by ELISA compared with Cos7-LacZ control cells. E, Western blot analysis of the c-Myc epitope in 6 different Cos7-MDKΔ81-121 subclones. F, MDKΔ81-121 immunoblotting of the culture supernatant of Cos7-transfected cells (subclones 10).

We then produced Cos7 cells expressing MDKΔ81-121 constitutively. We harvested 26 clones stably transfected with the pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121-MycHis plasmid or pcDNA3-LacZ as control and assessed the expression of the truncated MDK protein using a specific ELISA assay on cell supernatants. The expression of MDKΔ81-121 was up to 30 ng of MDKΔ81-121/mg of protein in 3 clones (clones 9, 10, and 11), whereas no expression was detected in the supernatant of Cos7 cells transfected with pcDNA3-LacZ (Fig. 3D). As the MDKΔ81-121 is fused to the c-Myc epitope tag, we performed two different Western blots to verify the molecular mass of the secreted MDKΔ81-121 protein. The first was performed towards the c-Myc epitope and showed the presence of the c-Myc tag in the 6 clones tested (Fig. 3E). The second was performed towards the MDK epitope and showed the secreted immunoreactive protein with a molecular mass of 11.2 kDa (Fig. 3F).

To assess the potential paracrine inhibitory effect of MDKΔ81-121 on tumor growth, we performed a cell proliferation assay using two neuroblastoma cell lines (IGR-N91, SHSY-5Y) expressing a high level of MDK. Conditioned media from Cos7-MDKΔ81-121 (clone 11) and Cos7-control cells were added to tumor cells in culture over 4 days. As illustrated in Fig. 4A, tumor cell proliferation was significantly inhibited by 33% for IGR-N91 cells (P < 3 × 10−7), and by 43% for SH-SY5Y cells (P < 1 × 10−6). To confirm these results, we used a recombinant adenovirus carrying a CMV-driven MDKΔ81-121 peptide (AdMDKΔ81-121) and an isogenic adenovirus (AdCO1) as control. The efficacy of adenovirus-mediated gene delivery was first evaluated by quantifying the proportion of cells infected with the AdCMV-GFP reporter virus after 48 hours by FACS analysis (Fig. 4B). The dose of 100 multiplicity of infection (MOI) enabled us to efficiently transduce all IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines as well as human primary endothelial cells (HUVECs). Under these conditions, transduction of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines by AdMDKΔ81-121 resulted in stronger significant inhibition of cell proliferation compared with the use of the Cos7-conditioned medium (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

MDKΔ81-121 and AdMDKΔ81-121 induced the inhibition of cell proliferation. A, MDKΔ81-121 induced inhibition of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y tumor cell proliferation. Both cell lines were cultured with pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121 Cos7-conditioned medium and cell viability was assessed after 96 hours by MTT assay. Medium from nontransfected Cos7 cells was used as control. B, FACS analysis of IGR-N91, SH-SY5Y, and HUVEC transduced with 100 MOI of AdCMV-GFP reporter virus. C, AdMDKΔ81-121 induced inhibition of IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y tumor cell proliferation. Both cell lines were infected with 100 MOI of AdMDKΔ81-121 and cell viability was assessed after 96h by MTT assay. An adenovirus isogenic control devoid of a transgene (AdCO1) was used as control. D, MDKΔ81-121 and AdMDKΔ81-121 induced inhibition of HUVEC cell proliferation. E, quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed suppression of Ki67 expression in HUVEC transduced with AdMDKΔ81-121. F, MDKΔ81-121 induced inhibition of tube-like structure formation using an endothelial tube formation assay on Matrigel. HUVEC cells were cultured with 100 or 250 μL of conditioned medium (MDKΔ81-121 or control medium) and the capillary-like structures were stained with Giemsa. The length of networks was quantified under phase-contrast microscopy. Each experiment was done at least twice; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005.

Effect of MDKΔ81-121 on angiogenesis

To evaluate a possible antiangiogenic role of MDKΔ81-121, we first performed a proliferation assay on HUVEC, under the same conditions as for the tumor cells. We observed 60% inhibition of HUVEC proliferation (P < 5 × 10−7) with the supernatant containing MDKΔ81-121, compared with the control or after their infection with 100 MOI of AdMDKΔ81-121 (Fig. 4D). These results were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR with complete repression of Ki67 expression in AdMDKΔ81-121 transduced HUVECs compared with control (AdCO1-transduced) cells (Fig. 4E).

As endothelial cell migration is also an important process in angiogenesis, we then used an in vitro Matrigel angiogenesis assay based on the differentiation of endothelial cells and the formation of tube-like structures on an extracellular matrix. HUVEC cells were seeded on Matrigel in the presence of 100 or 250 μL of conditioned medium (MDKΔ81-121 or control medium). As shown in Fig. 4F, we observed dose-dependent inhibition of tube-like structure formation with a 59% mean reduction after adding 250 μL of MDKΔ81-121 conditioned medium.

To obtain further evidence for antiangiogenic activity of MDKΔ81-121, we studied the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated apoptosis in endothelial cells transduced with AdMDKΔ81-121. C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), also known as DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3) is the key proapoptotic effector of ER stress–mediated apoptosis. CHOP expression was significantly upregulated in HUVECs transduced with AdMDKΔ81-121 (70-fold increase, P < 0.01) as assessed by quantitative RT-PCR (Table 2). We observed significant activation of a set of genes implicated in an unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway, which triggers apoptosis in the case of intensive ER-stress, such as heat shock 70-kDa Protein 5 (HSPA5), growth arrest- and DNA damage-inducible protein (GADD34), activating transcription factor 2 and 3 (ATF2 and ATF3), and the spliced variant of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1S) in endothelial cells expressing truncated MDKΔ81-121 protein (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Real-time RT-PCR analysis of CHOP pathway–mediated apoptosis in HUVEC cells transduced with AdMDKΔ81-121 or AdCO1.

As endothelial cells boarding blood vessels are surrounded by SMCs and fibroblasts, we therefore investigated the inhibitory effect of MDKΔ81-121 on SMC (Fig. 5B) and MRC-5 fibroblast (Fig. 5A) using the MTT proliferation assay. Cell proliferation was significantly inhibited when MRC5 (P < 0.0001) and SMC (P = 0.005) were infected with AdMDKΔ81-121 with 57% and 38% of inhibition, respectively. In contrast, when SMC were treated with MDK (100 ng/mL), no increase in cell proliferation was observed (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

In vitro assessment of AdMDKΔ81-121 effect on HUVEC and SMC apoptosis and proliferation. A, proliferation of MRC-5 cells transduced with 50 or 100 MOI AdMDKΔ81-121 was assessed with MTT assay after four days. B, cell proliferation of SMCs transduced with 200 MOI AdMDKΔ81-121 or AdCO1 as control. C, proliferation of SMC treated with MDK (100 ng/mL) was assessed after 96 hours by MTT assay. D, endothelial cell proliferation assay after coculture with SMC or AdMDKΔ81-121-transduced SMC with or without MDK treatment. Each experiment was done at least twice. NS, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005.

We further studied the effect of AdMDKΔ81-121 on endothelial cells proliferation when cocultured with SMC during 48 hours in the presence or not of 100 ng/mL of MDK (Fig. 5D). In these experiments, when HUVEC were treated only with MDK no increase in cell proliferation was observed (P = 0.65). However, when HUVEC were cocultured with SMC, MDK significantly increased the cell proliferation (P = 0.0002). Furthermore coculture of HUVEC with AdMDKΔ81-121–transduced SMC with or without MDK repressed significantly HUVEC proliferation (Fig. 5D).

Inhibition of tumor growth by MDKΔ81-121 in vivo

To confirm the antitumor potency of MDKΔ81-121 in vivo, we used a prophylactic protocol after muscle electrotransfer of the pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121-MycHis plasmid. We first electrotransferred 30 μg pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121-MycHis or pcDNA3-LacZ into the tibialis cranialis muscles of nude mice (n = 10 per group). Seven days later, 10 × 106 IGR-N91 cells were inoculated subcutaneously. Serum was collected from mice 41 days after the electrotransfer to quantify the systemic amount of MDKΔ81-121 secreted by the electrotransferred muscle cells. As shown in Fig. 6A, IGR-N91 tumors from the MDKΔ81-121–treated group did not grow and after 2 weeks the tumor size reduced drastically, whereas the tumors from the control group treated with pcDNA3-LacZ increased in size. This inhibition correlated with the detection of MDKΔ81-121 immunoreactive material in the serum (Fig. 6B) and in the muscles (Fig. 6C). IGR-N91 tumors treated with MDKΔ81-121 appeared much less vascularized than the β-galactosidase–treated control group (Fig. 6A). Intratumoral angiogenesis was thus assessed by CD31 and α-SMA immunostaining of tumor sections (Fig. 6F). The results indicated a marked reduction (37%) of intratumoral vascularization within MDKΔ81-121–treated tumors (score of 3.15 ± 0.15) as compared with the β-galactosidase–treated group (score of 2.14 ± 0.05; Fig. 6D and E). These results correlated with SMA immunostaining showing again the presence of large vessels only in tumors treated with MDKΔ81-121 (Fig. 6F). Tumor proliferation activity was assessed by Ki67 immunostaining, which is widely used in clinical pathology diagnostics. As shown in Fig. 6F, the proliferation appeared to be drastically decreased within MDKΔ81-121–treated tumors (50% vs. 90% of positive tumor cells) with a higher proportion of apoptotic cells through activation of caspase-3–mediated apoptosis pathway (35 ± 8 vs. 3 ± 2 positive nuclei per field; Fig. 6F).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Tumor growth and inhibition of intratumoral vascularization. A, effect of MDKΔ81-121 transgene expression after in vivo muscle pDNA electrotransfer on IGR-N91 tumor growth in nude mice. Animals received a subcutaneous injection of 10 × 106 IGR-N91 cells 7 days after electrotransfer. The mean tumor volume evolution is shown until day 25 in MDKΔ81-121–treated versus β-galactosidase–treated mice (P < 0.05). Tumors from MDKΔ81-121–treated and β-galactosidase–treated groups are shown at day 41 after cell inoculation. B, quantification of MDKΔ81-121 in serum by ELISA. C, detection of β-galactosidase and MDKΔ81-121 in electroporated muscle by immunohistochemistry. D, the extent of intratumoral vascularization was assessed by CD31 immunostaining and quantified by assessing the mean immunoreactive score within the whole tumor area at day 41. E, the extent of vascularization of a representative tumor treated with MDKΔ81-121 and the control (β-galactosidase) is shown 41 days after the subcutaneous injection of cells. F, antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and antiangiogenic effect of MDKΔ81-121 is demonstrated by immunohistochemitry on tumor slices for Ki67, caspase-3 and SMA, respectively.

Discussion

PTN and MDK are members of a new family of neurotrophic factors known to be expressed in many human tumors (24–27). They participate in tumorigenesis through their action on angiogenesis and cell proliferation (18, 28), and their expression is highly correlated with metastasis development (29).

MDK and PTN were found to play an important role in regulating growth and differentiation in neuroblastoma, the third most common childhood solid tumor, which originates from the sympathoadrenal lineage of the neural crest. Both factors were found to be expressed in many primary neuroblastomas, but their patterns of expression were found to be quite different. PTN was found to be highly expressed in favorable neuroblastomas (stages I, II, and IV-S), whereas it was expressed at a significantly lower level in advanced tumors (stages III and IV; ref. 30). Furthermore, PTN was not expressed in aggressive neuroblastoma with N-myc amplification nor in eleven different neuroblastoma cell lines. In contrast, MDK was highly expressed in almost all primary neuroblastomas and cell lines and showed no correlation with disease stage or N-myc amplification. Unlike PTN, MDK expression was higher in undifferentiated and aggressive neuroblastomas (stage III and IV) and the plasma MDK level was thus found to be a prognostic factor for patients with neuroblastoma (31). These observations support the idea that MDK is a better molecular target candidate than PTN for neuroblastoma therapy and may therefore be considered as a new strategy for blocking tumor development and angiogenesis.

We collected 8 neuroblastoma cell lines to explore the MDK/PTN pathway. In contrast to PTN, all the cell lines ubiquitously produced and secreted MDK and expressed all the RPTP-receptor–related proteins. As several studies have suggested PTN and MDK as possible ligands for ALK (13, 32), we quantified ALK mRNA, identified the protein in the 8 different cell lines and demonstrated that ALK was not expressed at the same level in all cell lines. Five out of 8 cell lines exhibited high ALK expression, whereas 3 expressed only low levels. These results are consistent with previous reports which showed that full-length ALK is detected in almost half of the cell lines derived from neuroblastomas (33, 34). We were unable to show that these patterns of expression were associated with ALK amplification and that there was an association between ALK and N-myc amplification. Furthermore, significant amplification of ALK appeared to be rarely observed in human neuroblastoma samples (33) and in neuroblastoma cell lines (20). Recently, somatic and germline activating mutations of the ALK kinase domain of the receptor were documented in human neuroblastoma samples and in neuroblastoma cell lines. These mutations were mainly clustered in two hotspots located in exon 23 (F1174V) or exon 25 (R1275Q). The F1174V mutation was observed more frequently in cell lines than in primary tumors, suggesting that the former may provide a selective in vitro growth advantage (20). Interestingly, the knockdown of ALK mRNA by siRNA resulted in profound inhibition of cell proliferation in all cell lines harboring mutant or wild-type ALK (20).

In the current study, we investigated a new strategy evaluating the antitumor and antiangiogenesis effects in a neuroblastoma model of a truncated MDK lacking the COOH-terminal 81 to 121 portion of the molecule (MDKΔ81-121), that might act as a dominant-negative effector for its mitogenic, angiogenic, and tumorigenic activities by interfering with the wild-type native protein.

We decided to use two cell lines (SH-SY5Y and IGR-N91) to perform a further analysis of the effect of MDKΔ81-121 for several reasons. Both cell lines expressed a high level of MDK and a low level of PTN compared with other cell lines, suggesting the existence of a dominant autocrine MDK signaling loop. In addition, ALK mRNA was highly expressed in SH-SY5Y cells and was 52-fold higher than the mRNA level detected in IGR-N91 cells and both cell lines identically expressed the other tyrosine kinase receptors (RPTPs and LRPs).

Our study was completed with the use of specific MDK siRNA, to downregulate the level of MDK mRNA in both cell lines. As MDK and PTN share same receptors and have 45% structural homology, we investigated whether knockdown of PTN expression together with MDK could have a synergic effect on cell proliferation. Our results showed that MDK siRNA alone or together with PTN siRNA induced significant specific inhibition of proliferation of both cell lines. That was more pronounced for IGR-N91 cell lines which expressed the highest level of MDK. We thus believe in the existence of a strong autocrine MDK signaling loop in both cell lines. However, extinction of PTN expression together with MDK did not have any additive or synergic inhibitory effect on IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y proliferation. This observation is consistent with the data regarding the low PTN expression level in these two cell lines (Fig. 1A) and our observation that PTN protein was not detectable in these two cell lines supernatant once assessed by ELISA (data not shown).

We demonstrated that MDKΔ81-121 is able to significantly inhibit the proliferation of both IGR-N91 and SH-SY5Y cell lines in vitro. In this case, it might be probably due to the heterodimerization of MDKΔ81-121 with endogenous MDK which mainly explains its dominant-negative effect and that MDKΔ81-121 might be able to dissociate MDK homodimers, thereby might induce the formation of nonfunctional heterodimers. Thus, the inhibition of MDK in both cell lines exerts several effects on different important cellular systems. In this context, we believe that the inhibition of MDK by MDKΔ81-121 abolishes the MDK/ALK and/or the MDK/RPTPβ/ζ signaling pathways, as previously suggested with a PTN-derived peptide lacking the C-terminal residues (PTNΔ111-136). PTNΔ111-136 was shown to act as a potent inhibitor of PTN biologic activities by the formation of inactive heretodimers (PTN/PTNΔ111-136; ref. 9). In particular, binding studies using a biotinylated peptide showed that PTNΔ111-136 could interfere with PTN binding to DU145 prostatic tumor cells, in an RPTPβ/ζ-dependent fashion (35). Furthermore, PTNΔ111-136 was shown to bind to the extracellular domain of ALK and to inhibit PTN-induced mitogenesis (9, 12) and thus is also able to interfere with the PTN/ALK pathway. MDK and PTN are members of the same neurotrophic family factors and are both basic, cysteine-rich polypeptides containing identical heparin-binding motifs, which are essential for the dimerization of PTN and MDK. They exhibit about 50% of homology and no sequence homology with other heparin-binding proteins, such as fibroblast growth factors. In this context, the formation of MDKΔ81-121/PTN heterodimers is not excluded and further experiments are warranted to explore this hypothesis.

As angiogenesis is also known to be a key mechanism via which MDK promotes tumorigenesis, we then investigated the effects of MDKΔ81-121 on endothelial cell proliferation and migration. We were able to show that the inhibition of MDK by MDKΔ81-121 has major consequences on different stages of angiogenesis, because MDKΔ81-121 strongly inhibited the proliferation and the migration of endothelial cells in vitro. We also showed that MDKΔ81-121 could have major effects on their structural organization in a three-dimensional model. MDKΔ81-121 is able to reduce the formation of capillary-like structures, a crucial step in tumor neovascularization. The effects of MDKΔ81-121 on HUVEC could be mediated by the inhibition of ALK and/or RPTPβ/ζ tyrosine kinase receptors as HUVECs have been shown to express MDK and both receptors (36, 37) enabling the stimulation of the phosphorylation of ALK (36) and the activation of the Akt and ERK pathways (38). We also showed that MDKΔ81-121 inhibits endothelial cell cycling with a complete extinction of Ki67 expression, while promotes cell apoptosis via activation of a set of genes, including CHOP, implicated in ER stress–mediated apoptosis pathway. These data are consistent with the observations from U87MG glioblastoma cell line and the truncated protein PTNΔ111-136 which enhances apoptosis via CHOP protein (39).

Angiogenesis process involves interactive dialog between endothelial and SMCs. These interactions were previously studied by Sumi and colleagues using an artificial blood vessel model (23). They documented that MDK had no effect on the human aortic SMC or endothelial cells when cultured separately and these observations are in concordance with our results showing no effect of MDK on SMCs and HUVECs. They also clearly showed that MDK promotes growth and glycosaminoglycan synthesis of HUVEC through its action on smooth muscle cells that are able to produce IL8. To evaluate whether MDKΔ81-121 is able to disrupt this interaction, we have cocultured HUVECs and SMCs that were transduced or not with an adenovirus expressing MDKΔ81-121. We were able to show that only the coculture of HUVEC and SMC treated with MDK could trigger the proliferation of HUVECs. This effect was abolished by MDKΔ81-121.

To complete and confirm our in vitro experiments, we investigated the antitumoral efficacy and antiangiogenic properties of MDKΔ81-121 using an in vivo therapeutic approach, namely the intramuscular electrotransfer of a plasmid delivering a secretable form of MDKΔ81-121. A single intramuscular injection of pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121 but not the control plasmid was shown to inhibit primary tumor growth without apparent toxicity. This antitumor inhibitory effect was tightly correlated with markedly decreased intratumoral vascularization and with the detection of MDKΔ81-121 immunoreactive material in muscle sections and blood. As MDK is known to both promote proliferation and inhibit caspase-dependent apoptosis (40), MDKΔ81-121 can be considered to induce these two mechanisms, and thereby, to inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells. The MDKΔ81-121–treated tumors apparently failed to establish a vascular network within the tumor mass to support rapid and extensive growth, and this failure translated into >80% inhibition of tumor growth. The treated tumors were shown to be less aggressive and less vascularized and to have a higher apoptotic index. This effect was attributed to the efficient action of MDKΔ81-121 on endothelial cell growth and migration and on SMCs which participate in the formation to the vascular network.

In conclusion, we showed that specific targeting of MDK by MDKΔ81-121 results in strong inhibition of a neuroblastoma model and inhibition of the angiogenesis process. Nevertheless, the fact that cDNA muscle electrotransfer failed to completely abolish tumorigenesis emphasizes the importance of improving the gene transfer method, so that sustained expression can be achieved for maximum clinical benefits. We also intend to combine PTN inhibitors or tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting ALK and/or RPTPβ/ζ receptors to enhance MDK inhibitor potency and thus improve the clinical outcome of children with neuroblastoma.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: N. Dianat, B. Le Viet, F. Griscelli

Development of methodology: B. Le Viet, E. Gobbo, F. Griscelli

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): N. Dianat, B. Le Viet, N. Auger, I. Bieche, F. Griscelli

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): N. Dianat, B. Le Viet, F. Griscelli

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: N. Dianat, B. Le Viet, I. Bieche, A. Bennaceur-Griscelli, F. Griscelli

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): B. Le Viet, E. Gobbo, F. Griscelli

Study supervision: B. Le Viet, I. Bieche, F. Griscelli

Grant Support

This work was supported by grant from “Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer” (grant no. 4882). All the authors were financed by the same grant.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey for providing the neuroblastoma cell lines, Dr. Jean Bénard for IGR-N91 cell line, Dr. Georges Uzan for SMCs, and Lorna Saint Ange for editing. The authors also thank Aurélie Ducès for providing pcDNA3-MDKΔ81-121-MycHis plasmid construct and Delphine Dargere for technical assistance with siRNA experiments. L'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), l'Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), and le Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche are acknowledged for financial support.

  • Received April 28, 2014.
  • Revision received October 20, 2014.
  • Accepted November 5, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Griscelli F,
    2. Li H,
    3. Bennaceur-Griscelli A,
    4. Soria J,
    5. Opolon P,
    6. Soria C,
    7. et al.
    Angiostatin gene transfer: inhibition of tumor growth in vivo by blockage of endothelial cell proliferation associated with a mitosis arrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:6367–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Magnon C,
    2. Galaup A,
    3. Mullan B,
    4. Rouffiac V,
    5. Bouquet C,
    6. Bidart J-M,
    7. et al.
    Canstatin acts on endothelial and tumor cells via mitochondrial damage initiated through interaction with alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrins. Cancer Res 2005;65:4353–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dkhissi F,
    2. Lu H,
    3. Soria C,
    4. Opolon P,
    5. Griscelli F,
    6. Liu H,
    7. et al.
    Endostatin exhibits a direct antitumor effect in addition to its antiangiogenic activity in colon cancer cells. Hum Gene Ther 2003;14:997–1008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Magnon C,
    2. Opolon P,
    3. Ricard M,
    4. Connault E,
    5. Ardouin P,
    6. Galaup A,
    7. et al.
    Radiation and inhibition of angiogenesis by canstatin synergize to induce HIF-1alpha-mediated tumor apoptotic switch. J Clin Invest 2007;117:1844–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tarui T,
    2. Miles LA,
    3. Takada Y
    . Specific interaction of angiostatin with integrin alpha(v)beta(3) in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2001;276:39562–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sudhakar A,
    2. Sugimoto H,
    3. Yang C,
    4. Lively J,
    5. Zeisberg M,
    6. Kalluri R
    . Human tumstatin and human endostatin exhibit distinct antiangiogenic activities mediated by alpha v beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:4766–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Galaup A,
    2. Opolon P,
    3. Bouquet C,
    4. Li H,
    5. Opolon D,
    6. Bissery M-C,
    7. et al.
    Combined effects of docetaxel and angiostatin gene therapy in prostate tumor model. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther 2003;7:731–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Griscelli F,
    2. Li H,
    3. Cheong C,
    4. Opolon P,
    5. Bennaceur-Griscelli A,
    6. Vassal G,
    7. et al.
    Combined effects of radiotherapy and angiostatin gene therapy in glioma tumor model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:6698–703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bernard-Pierrot I,
    2. Delbé J,
    3. Rouet V,
    4. Vigny M,
    5. Kerros M-E,
    6. Caruelle D,
    7. et al.
    Dominant negative effectors of heparin affin regulatory peptide (HARP) angiogenic and transforming activities. J Biol Chem 2002;277:32071–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ducès A,
    2. Karaky R,
    3. Martel-Renoir D,
    4. Mir L,
    5. Hamma-Kourbali Y,
    6. Biéche I,
    7. et al.
    16-kDa fragment of pleiotrophin acts on endothelial and breast tumor cells and inhibits tumor development. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:2817–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Iwasaki W,
    2. Nagata K,
    3. Hatanaka H,
    4. Inui T,
    5. Kimura T,
    6. Muramatsu T,
    7. et al.
    Solution structure of midkine, a new heparin-binding growth factor. EMBO J 1997;16:6936–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bernard-Pierrot I,
    2. Delbe J,
    3. Caruelle D,
    4. Barritault D,
    5. Courty J,
    6. Milhiet PE
    . The lysine-rich C-terminal tail of heparin affin regulatory peptide is required for mitogenic and tumor formation activities. J Biol Chem 2001;276:12228–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Stoica GE,
    2. Kuo A,
    3. Powers C,
    4. Bowden ET,
    5. Sale EB,
    6. Riegel AT,
    7. et al.
    Midkine binds to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and acts as a growth factor for different cell types. J Biol Chem 2002;277:35990–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Müller S,
    2. Kunkel P,
    3. Lamszus K,
    4. Ulbricht U,
    5. Lorente GA,
    6. Nelson AM,
    7. et al.
    A role for receptor tyrosine phosphatase zeta in glioma cell migration. Oncogene 2003;22:6661–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Chen S,
    2. Bu G,
    3. Takei Y,
    4. Sakamoto K,
    5. Ikematsu S,
    6. Muramatsu T,
    7. et al.
    Midkine and LDL-receptor-related protein 1 contribute to the anchorage-independent cell growth of cancer cells. J Cell Sci 2007;120:4009–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kurtz A,
    2. Schulte AM,
    3. Wellstein A
    . Pleiotrophin and midkine in normal development and tumor biology. Crit Rev Oncog 1995;6:151–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Friedrich C,
    2. Holtkamp N,
    3. Cinatl J Jr.,
    4. Sakuma S,
    5. Mautner VF,
    6. Wellman S,
    7. et al.
    Overexpression of Midkine in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cells inhibits apoptosis and increases angiogenic potency. Int J Oncol 2005;27:1433–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Choudhuri R,
    2. Zhang HT,
    3. Donnini S,
    4. Ziche M,
    5. Bicknell R
    . An angiogenic role for the neurokines midkine and pleiotrophin in tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 1997;57:1814–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ikematsu S,
    2. Nakagawara A,
    3. Nakamura Y,
    4. Sakuma S,
    5. Wakai K,
    6. Muramatsu T,
    7. et al.
    Correlation of elevated level of blood midkine with poor prognostic factors of human neuroblastomas. Br J Cancer 2003;88:1522–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Janoueix-Lerosey I,
    2. Lequin D,
    3. Brugières L,
    4. Ribeiro A,
    5. de Pontual L,
    6. Combaret V,
    7. et al.
    Somatic and germline activating mutations of the ALK kinase receptor in neuroblastoma. Nature 2008;455:967–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ferrandis E,
    2. Da Silva J,
    3. Riou G,
    4. Bénard I
    . Coactivation of the MDR1 and MYCN genes in human neuroblastoma cells during the metastatic process in the nude mouse. Cancer Res 1994;54:2256–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Martín de Llano JJ,
    2. Fuertes G,
    3. García-Vicent C,
    4. Torró I,
    5. Fayos JL,
    6. Lurbe E
    . Procedure to consistently obtain endothelial and smooth muscle cell cultures from umbilical cord vessels. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med 2007;149:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sumi Y,
    2. Muramatsu H,
    3. Takei Y,
    4. Hata K-I,
    5. Ueda M,
    6. Muramatsu T
    . Midkine, a heparin-binding growth factor, promotes growth and glycosaminoglycan synthesis of endothelial cells through its action on smooth muscle cells in an artificial blood vessel model. J Cell Sci 2002;115:2659–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Souttou B,
    2. Juhl H,
    3. Hackenbruck J,
    4. Röckseisen M,
    5. Klomp HJ,
    6. Raulais D,
    7. et al.
    Relationship between serum concentrations of the growth factor pleiotrophin and pleiotrophin-positive tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1468–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Soulié P,
    2. Héroult M,
    3. Bernard-Pierrot I,
    4. Caruelle D,
    5. Oglobine J,
    6. Barritault D,
    7. et al.
    Correlation of elevated plasma levels of two structurally related growth factors, heparin affin regulatory peptide and midkine, in advanced solid tumor patients. Cancer Detect Prev 2004;28:319–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ruan M,
    2. Ji T,
    3. Wu Z,
    4. Zhou J,
    5. Zhang C
    . Evaluation of expression of midkine in oral squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with tumour angiogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:159–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kaifi JT,
    2. Fiegel HC,
    3. Rafnsdottir SL,
    4. Aridome K,
    5. Schurr PG,
    6. Reichelt U,
    7. et al.
    Midkine as a prognostic marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2007;133:431–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Jin Z,
    2. Lahat G,
    3. Korchin B,
    4. Nguyen T,
    5. Zhu Q-S,
    6. Wang X,
    7. et al.
    Midkine enhances soft-tissue sarcoma growth: a possible novel therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5033–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Czubayko F,
    2. Schulte AM,
    3. Berchem GJ,
    4. Wellstein A
    . Melanoma angiogenesis and metastasis modulated by ribozyme targeting of the secreted growth factor pleiotrophin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:14753–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Nakagawara A,
    2. Milbrandt J,
    3. Muramatsu T,
    4. Deuel TF,
    5. Zhao H,
    6. Cnaan A,
    7. et al.
    Differential expression of pleiotrophin and midkine in advanced neuroblastomas. Cancer Res 1995;55:1792–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Ikematsu S,
    2. Nakagawara A,
    3. Nakamura Y,
    4. Ohira M,
    5. Shinjo M,
    6. Kishida S,
    7. et al.
    Plasma midkine level is a prognostic factor for human neuroblastoma. Cancer Sci 2008;99:2070–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Stoica GE,
    2. Kuo A,
    3. Aigner A,
    4. Sunitha I,
    5. Souttou B,
    6. Malerczyk C,
    7. et al.
    Identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase as a receptor for the growth factor pleiotrophin. J Biol Chem 2001;276:16772–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Osajima-Hakomori Y,
    2. Miyake I,
    3. Ohira M,
    4. Nakagawara A,
    5. Nakagawa A,
    6. Sakai R
    . Biological role of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in neuroblastoma. Am J Pathol 2005;167:213–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lamant L,
    2. Pulford K,
    3. Bischof D,
    4. Morris SW,
    5. Mason DY,
    6. Delsol G,
    7. et al.
    Expression of the ALK tyrosine kinase gene in neuroblastoma. Am J Pathol 2000;156:1711–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Bermek O,
    2. Diamantopoulou Z,
    3. Polykratis A,
    4. Dos Santos C,
    5. Hamma-Kourbali Y,
    6. Burlina F,
    7. et al.
    A basic peptide derived from the HARP C-terminus inhibits anchorage-independent growth of DU145 prostate cancer cells. Exp Cell Res 2007;313:4041–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Zhang N,
    2. Deuel TF
    . Pleiotrophin and midkine, a family of mitogenic and angiogenic heparin-binding growth and differentiation factors. Curr Opin Hematol 1999;6:44–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Polykratis A,
    2. Katsoris P,
    3. Courty J,
    4. Papadimitriou E
    . Characterization of heparin affin regulatory peptide signaling in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2005;280:22454–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Takenaka H,
    2. Horiba M,
    3. Ishiguro H,
    4. Sumida A,
    5. Hojo M,
    6. Usui A,
    7. et al.
    Midkine prevents ventricular remodeling and improves long-term survival after myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;296:H462–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Karaky R,
    2. Gobbo E,
    3. Opolon P,
    4. Delbé J,
    5. Courty J,
    6. Griscelli F,
    7. et al.
    HARPΔ111-136 enhances radiation-induced apoptosis of U87MG glioblastoma by induction of the proapoptotic protein CHOP. Int J Oncol 2011;38:179–88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Owada K,
    2. Sanjo N,
    3. Kobayashi T,
    4. Mizusawa H,
    5. Muramatsu H,
    6. Muramatsu T,
    7. et al.
    Midkine inhibits caspase-dependent apoptosis via the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in cultured neurons. J Neurochem 1999;73:2084–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.
    1. Li Z,
    2. Tan F,
    3. Liewehr DJ,
    4. Steinberg SM,
    5. Thiele CJ
    . In vitro and in vivo inhibition of neuroblastoma tumor cell growth by AKT inhibitor perifosine. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:758–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.
    1. Goldschneider D,
    2. Horvilleur E,
    3. Plassa L-F,
    4. Guillaud-Bataille M,
    5. Million K,
    6. Wittmer-Dupret E,
    7. et al.
    Expression of C-terminal deleted p53 isoforms in neuroblastoma. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:5603–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.
    1. Mergui X,
    2. Leteurtre F,
    3. Lipinski M,
    4. Bénard J,
    5. Amor-Guéret M
    . Two distinctly altered cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks in human neuroblastoma. Biochimie 2008;90:1656–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.
    1. Davidoff AM,
    2. Pence JC,
    3. Shorter NA,
    4. Iglehart JD,
    5. Marks JR
    . Expression of p53 in human neuroblastoma- and neuroepithelioma-derived cell lines. Oncogene 1992;7:127–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. 45.
    1. Carr J,
    2. Bell E,
    3. Pearson ADJ,
    4. Kees UR,
    5. Beris H,
    6. Lunec J,
    7. et al.
    Increased frequency of aberrations in the p53/MDM2/p14(ARF) pathway in neuroblastoma cell lines established at relapse. Cancer Res 2006;66:2138–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 14 (1)
January 2015
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Midkine Lacking Its Last 40 Amino Acids Acts on Endothelial and Neuroblastoma Tumor Cells and Inhibits Tumor Development
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Midkine Lacking Its Last 40 Amino Acids Acts on Endothelial and Neuroblastoma Tumor Cells and Inhibits Tumor Development
Noushin Dianat, Barbara Le Viet, Emilie Gobbo, Nathalie Auger, Ivan Bièche, Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli and Frank Griscelli
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2015 (14) (1) 213-224; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0226

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Midkine Lacking Its Last 40 Amino Acids Acts on Endothelial and Neuroblastoma Tumor Cells and Inhibits Tumor Development
Noushin Dianat, Barbara Le Viet, Emilie Gobbo, Nathalie Auger, Ivan Bièche, Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli and Frank Griscelli
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2015 (14) (1) 213-224; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0226
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Ormeloxifene and Prostate Cancer
  • Proinflammatory Cytokines and Drug Resistance
  • ABCB1 Confers Cross-Resistance to Cabazitaxel and Docetaxel
Show more Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement