Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • First Disclosures
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Small Molecule Therapeutics

Translational Exposure–Efficacy Modeling to Optimize the Dose and Schedule of Taxanes Combined with the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor MLN8237 (Alisertib)

Jessica J. Huck, Mengkun Zhang, Jerome Mettetal, Arijit Chakravarty, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Xiaofei Zhou, Rob Kleinfield, Marc L. Hyer, Karuppiah Kannan, Vaishali Shinde, Andy Dorner, Mark G. Manfredi, Wen Chyi Shyu and Jeffrey A. Ecsedy
Jessica J. Huck
1Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mengkun Zhang
1Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerome Mettetal
2Department of DMPK, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arijit Chakravarty
2Department of DMPK, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karthik Venkatakrishnan
3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaofei Zhou
3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob Kleinfield
4Department of Drug Development Management, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc L. Hyer
1Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karuppiah Kannan
1Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vaishali Shinde
5Department of Molecular Pathology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andy Dorner
6Department of Translational Medicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark G. Manfredi
1Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wen Chyi Shyu
2Department of DMPK, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey A. Ecsedy
6Department of Translational Medicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massacheusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jeffrey.ecsedy@takeda.com
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0027 Published September 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    MLN8237 combined with docetaxel results in antitumor activity in three models of triple-negative breast cancer, including the cell line xenograft MDA-MB-231 (A), the primary human breast tumor xenograft PHTX-02B (B), and the primary human breast tumor xenograft PHTX-14B (C). Mice were treated for 21 days with MLN8237 (p.o., every day), docetaxel (i.v., every week × 3), or the combination of both at the indicated doses. Tumors were measured twice weekly with vernier calipers; error bars, SEM. The dotted line box indicates the 21-day treatment period.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    MLN8237 and docetaxel exposures are similar when dosed alone or in combination and result in an increased mitotic index. A single dose of MLN8237 (10 mg/kg), docetaxel (5 mg/kg), or the combination of both, was administered to mice bearing MDA-MB-231 xenografts. Blood and tumor samples were taken at multiple times out to 24 hours. A, MLN8237 and docetaxel concentrations are shown in both the plasma and the MDA-MB-231 tumor xenograft. B, MDA-MB-231 tumor sections (n = 3/group) were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies directed against phosphorylated Histone H3 on serine 10 (pHistH3) or MPM2 and the staining was quantified as described in the Materials and Methods. Error bars, SD.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    H&E staining of tumor xenografts results in morphologic changes following single agent or combination treatment with MLN8237 and docetaxel. Mice bearing PHTX-14B (A and B) and MDA-MB-231 (C and D) xenografts were treated with vehicle, MLN8237 (10 mg/kg p.o., every day), docetaxel (5 mg/kg i.v. every 7 days), or the combination of both for 10 days. On day 10, tissues were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tumor sections were stained by H&E and imaged. Tumor and nontumor areas were quantified in regions of the tumors that maintained viable cells using Definiens Tissue Studio software.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    MLN8237 administered on an intermittent 3 days on/4 days off schedule combined with docetaxel results in significant antitumor activity in two primary breast tumor models, PHTX-02B (A) and PHTX-14B (B). Tumor-bearing mice were treated with MLN8237 administered once daily for 3 days for 3 weeks (3on/4off), docetaxel administered once weekly for 3 weeks, or the combination of both. Tumors were measured twice weekly with vernier calipers; error bars, SEM. The dotted line box indicates the 21-day treatment period.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    MLN8237 combined with paclitaxel results in significant antitumor activity in the MDA-MB-231 (A) and PHTX-14B (B) tumor models. Tumor-bearing mice were treated for 21 days with MLN8237 (p.o., every day), paclitaxel (i.v., every 7 days), or the combination of both. Tumors were measured twice weekly with vernier calipers; error bars, SEM. The dotted line box indicates the 21-day treatment period.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A surface response plot relating MLN8237 and paclitaxel exposures to TGI (% TGI) generated from multiple in vivo efficacy studies in mice bearing the MDA-MB-231 xenograft (blue dots; A). An isobologram derived from the surface response plot (B). Clinically achieved exposures of MLN8237 (10 or 40 mg twice a day) and paclitaxel (60 or 80 mg/m2) from the NCT01091428 study represented by the red stars were mapped onto the isobologram by correcting for mouse-to-human variation in plasma protein binding and maximum tolerated exposures for both agents [AUCu/CF (correction factor)]. Predicted TGI derived from the exposure–efficacy surface response plot with increasing doses of MLN8237 administered twice a day with or without paclitaxel (C).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Antitumor activity summary of MLN8237 combined with docetaxel

    ModelMLN8237 dose (every day or 3 on/4 off)Docetaxel dose (every 7 days × 3)TGIc (%)TGD (days)dOutcome (AUC)e
    MDA-MB-231a3 mg/kg5 mg/kg54.27Synergistic
    10 mg/kg5 mg/kg91.8>48Synergistic
    10 mg/kg5 mg/kg67.311Synergistic
    3 mg/kg10 mg/kg112.746Synergistic
    10 mg/kg10 mg/kg117.9>106Synergistic
    10 mg/kg10 mg/kg106.1>41Synergistic
    PHTX-02Bb10 mg/kg5 mg/kg95.235Synergistic
    20 mg/kg5 mg/kg101.751Synergistic
    20 mg/kg5 mg/kg99.349Additive
    20 mg/kg 3 on/4 off5 mg/kg103.9>51Synergistic
    PHTX-14Bb10 mg/kg5 mg/kg123.4>45Synergistic
    20 mg/kg5 mg/kg125.4>45Synergistic
    10 mg/kg10 mg/kg128>45Synergistic
    20 mg/kg10 mg/kg134>45Synergistic
    3 mg/kg 3 on/4 off5 mg/kg85.638Additive
    20 mg/kg 3 on/4 off5 mg/kg123>60Synergistic
    3 mg/kg 3 on/4 off10 mg/kg121.5>60Additive
    20 mg/kg 3 on/4 off10 mg/kg140.1>76Synergistic
    • ↵aOrthotopic MDA-MB-231 xenografts were grown in the fat pad of nude mice and treated with MLN8237 administered orally for 21 days with docetaxel dosed i.v. once per week.

    • ↵bPrimary breast cancer models were grown subcutaneously in SCID (PHTX-14B) or NOD (PHTX-02B) mice and treated with MLN8237 administered orally for 21 days with docetaxel dosed i.v. once per week.

    • ↵cTGI = (Δ treated/Δ control) × 100/Δ control, was calculated on the last day of treatment.

    • ↵dTGD, the difference in days between the control and the treated groups to reach 1,000 mm3. > denotes that the treatment group was terminated before reaching 1,000 mm3.

    • ↵eSynergy analysis based on the AUC values days 0 to 20.

  • Table 2.

    Antitumor activity summary of MLN8237 combined with paclitaxel

    ModelMLN8237 dose (every day)Paclitaxel dose (every 7 days × 3)TGIc (%)TGD (days)dOutcome (AUC)e
    MDA-MB-231a20 mg/kg30 mg/kg101.435Synergistic
    20 mg/kg20 mg/kg94.326Synergistic
    20 mg/kg20 mg/kg96.324Synergistic
    20 mg/kg15 mg/kg85.716Additive
    20 mg/kg10 mg/kg45.874Additive
    20 mg/kg5 mg/kg43.64Additive
    10 mg/kg30 mg/kg102.431Synergistic
    10 mg/kg20 mg/kg81.913Additive
    10 mg/kg15 mg/kg85.614Additive
    10 mg/kg10 mg/kg42.34Additive
    3 mg/kg20 mg/kg69.210Additive
    3 mg/kg20 mg/kg60.57Additive
    3 mg/kg10 mg/kg21.72Additive
    3 mg/kg5 mg/kg20.82Additive
    PHTX-14Bb20 mg/kg20 mg/kg103>14Synergistic
    20 mg/kg10 mg/kg84>14Synergistic
    3 mg/kg20 mg/kg72>14No data
    • ↵aOrthotopic MDA-MB-231 xenografts were grown in the fat pad of nude mice and treated with MLN8237 administered orally for 21 days with paclitaxel dosed i.v. once per week.

    • ↵bPrimary breast cancer models were grown in SCID mice and treated with MLN8237 administered orally for 21 days with paclitaxel dosed i.v. once per week.

    • ↵cTGI = (Δ treated/Δ control) × 100/Δ control, was calculated on the last day of the treatment.

    • ↵dTGD, the difference in days between the control and the treated groups to reach 1,000 mm3. > denotes that the treatment group was terminated before reaching 1,000 mm3.

    • ↵eSynergy analysis based on the AUC values days 0 to 20.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Figures 1-5

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure 1. Sample simulated time-course of paclitaxel and MLN8237 PK after and the pharmacokinetic parameters used for MLN8237 and paclitaxel required to generate the exposure - efficacy model. Supplementary Figure 2. Predicted versus observed % TGI resulting from the best fit of the dose response surface to the xenograft tumor growth data. Supplementary Figure 3. Cleaved caspase 3 staining of tumor xenografts following single agent or combination treatment with MLN8237 and docetaxel in the PHTX-14B and MDA-MB-231 xenografts. Supplementary Figure 4. MLN8237 administered on an intermittent 3 days on / 4 days off schedule combined with paclitaxel results in additive antitumor activity in the MDA-MB-231 model. Supplementary Figure 5. MLN8237 and paclitaxel exposures are similar when dosed alone or in combination.
    • Data Supplement - Supplementary Figure Legends describing Supplementary Figures 1-5.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 13 (9)
September 2014
Volume 13, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Translational Exposure–Efficacy Modeling to Optimize the Dose and Schedule of Taxanes Combined with the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor MLN8237 (Alisertib)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Translational Exposure–Efficacy Modeling to Optimize the Dose and Schedule of Taxanes Combined with the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor MLN8237 (Alisertib)
Jessica J. Huck, Mengkun Zhang, Jerome Mettetal, Arijit Chakravarty, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Xiaofei Zhou, Rob Kleinfield, Marc L. Hyer, Karuppiah Kannan, Vaishali Shinde, Andy Dorner, Mark G. Manfredi, Wen Chyi Shyu and Jeffrey A. Ecsedy
Mol Cancer Ther September 1 2014 (13) (9) 2170-2183; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Translational Exposure–Efficacy Modeling to Optimize the Dose and Schedule of Taxanes Combined with the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor MLN8237 (Alisertib)
Jessica J. Huck, Mengkun Zhang, Jerome Mettetal, Arijit Chakravarty, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Xiaofei Zhou, Rob Kleinfield, Marc L. Hyer, Karuppiah Kannan, Vaishali Shinde, Andy Dorner, Mark G. Manfredi, Wen Chyi Shyu and Jeffrey A. Ecsedy
Mol Cancer Ther September 1 2014 (13) (9) 2170-2183; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0027
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Computer-Aided Discovery of a Bcl3 Inhibitor
  • IMD-0354, a Glutamine Carrier Protein Inhibitor in Melanoma
  • LY3214996-Based Treatment for RAS-Driven Lung Cancer
Show more Small Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement