Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Large Molecule Therapeutics

Targeting Integrin α6 Stimulates Curative-Type Bone Metastasis Lesions in a Xenograft Model

Terry H. Landowski, Jaime Gard, Erika Pond, Gerald D. Pond, Raymond B. Nagle, Christopher P. Geffre and Anne E. Cress
Terry H. Landowski
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaime Gard
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Pond
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald D. Pond
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond B. Nagle
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher P. Geffre
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne E. Cress
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
1University of Arizona Cancer Center; Departments of 2Medicine, 3Medical Imaging, 4Pathology, and 5Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0962 Published June 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    J8H antibody prevents ITGA6 cleavage and inhibits migration. A, PC3B1a cells were incubated with ITGA6 function-blocking antibodies for 48 hours and whole cell lysates assayed for the full length (A6), membrane-bound cleaved fraction (A6p), or amino terminal domain (A6N). Lanes represent duplicate-treated samples. B, cell migration through laminin-coated transwell inserts was assayed in the presence of the indicated neutralizing antibody specific for ITGA6 (J8H, J1B5, GoH3) or ITGB1 (AIIB2). Data are presented as % of control, which is isotype matched, nonspecific immunoglobulin (IgG). The non-antibody negative control is heparin sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) and the non-antibody positive control is EDTA. C, PC3B1a cells were assayed for adhesion to a laminin 511–coated plate in the presence or absence of the indicated reagent. Data are presented as % control, where control is IgG as above.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Study design. A, schematic illustrating the animal protocol including intracardiac injection (I.C. injection) with prostate cancer cells (PC3B1a) and weekly tail vein injections of antibody (J8H, 4 mg/kg). B, representative micro-CT scans of control vs. J8H-treated animals are shown before injection (Wk 0) or weekly beginning with week 3, which is the first point that radiographic lesions could be detected. The ROI used for lesion volume analysis is shown (white dotted circle). Animals were removed from the study (X) when imminent fracture was indicated by the radiologist (*).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Quantitative analysis of tumor progression. A, metastatic bone lesions were recorded if detected in 3 views by micro-CT (axial, coronal, and sagittal) as lytic lesions. The osteolyic lesions (n = 69) were followed weekly by micro-CT analysis in untreated animals (solid line, diamonds, n = 9) or J8H-treated animals (dashed line, squares, n = 13). The untreated lesions (n = 29) and treated lesions (n = 40) were scored for progression by the radiologist without knowledge of the treatment groups. B, serial lesion volumes were used to determine the rate of tumor progression over time. Significance was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric analysis (P < 0.01).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Survival advantage of J8H-treated animals. Survival advantage of the J8H-treated animals was determined using log rank analysis of the Kaplan–Meier survival time. Animals were followed for up to 8 weeks and were sacrificed if an imminent fracture in any lesion was detected by the radiologist, as dictated by the protocol.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    J8H-treated animals demonstrate a higher frequency of sclerotic lesions. A, axial, coronal, and sagittal views demonstrate reactive bone surrounding the osteolytic lesions. B, matched histologic sections obtained at the end of the study of the lesion in A. The black dotted circle defines PC3B1a prostate tumor growth abutting the epiphyseal plate. Increased magnification of the lesion demonstrates a sclerotic type lesion, encircled by vessels and new bone formation. C, the frequency of lytic or sclerotic lesions was scored by a radiologist using micro-CT images from untreated (n = 29) or J8H-treated (n = 40) animals. Individual lesions were evaluated at the end of the study, and data are presented as % of total lesions.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Soluble factors produced by PC3B1a cells with extracellular engagement of ITGA6. A, PC3B1a cells were incubated with J8H antibody for the indicated time, and the conditioned media collected and analyzed for Cyr61 concentration by ELISA assay. Concentration was calculated based on standard curve. B, PC3B1a CM or serum-deprived media (SDM) prepared in the presence or absence of J8H antibody engagement was incubated with HFF cells for 72 hours, followed by incubation with β-galactosidase substrate for 4 hours. Cells were then harvested and analyzed for SA-β-Gal activity by flow cytometry.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 13 (6)
June 2014
Volume 13, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Targeting Integrin α6 Stimulates Curative-Type Bone Metastasis Lesions in a Xenograft Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Targeting Integrin α6 Stimulates Curative-Type Bone Metastasis Lesions in a Xenograft Model
Terry H. Landowski, Jaime Gard, Erika Pond, Gerald D. Pond, Raymond B. Nagle, Christopher P. Geffre and Anne E. Cress
Mol Cancer Ther June 1 2014 (13) (6) 1558-1566; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0962

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Targeting Integrin α6 Stimulates Curative-Type Bone Metastasis Lesions in a Xenograft Model
Terry H. Landowski, Jaime Gard, Erika Pond, Gerald D. Pond, Raymond B. Nagle, Christopher P. Geffre and Anne E. Cress
Mol Cancer Ther June 1 2014 (13) (6) 1558-1566; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0962
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Improved Activity of CF10 in Preclinical Colorectal Cancer Models
  • Activity of ABBV-085 in Osteosarcoma
  • Predicting In Vitro Pharmacology of CD3 Bispecific Antibody
Show more Large Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement