Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction

PP2A Inhibition Is a Common Event in Colorectal Cancer and Its Restoration Using FTY720 Shows Promising Therapeutic Potential

Ion Cristóbal, Rebeca Manso, Raúl Rincón, Cristina Caramés, Clara Senin, Aurea Borrero, Javier Martínez-Useros, María Rodriguez, Sandra Zazo, Oscar Aguilera, Juan Madoz-Gúrpide, Federico Rojo and Jesús García-Foncillas
Ion Cristóbal
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebeca Manso
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raúl Rincón
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Caramés
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clara Senin
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aurea Borrero
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javier Martínez-Useros
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
María Rodriguez
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Zazo
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oscar Aguilera
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Madoz-Gúrpide
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico Rojo
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesús García-Foncillas
1Translational Oncology Division, Health Research Institute and Oncology Department, University Hospital “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Autonomous University of Madrid; 2Pathology Department, IIS “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid, Spain; and 3Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0150 Published April 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a tumor suppressor that regulates many signaling pathways crucial for cell transformation. In fact, decreased activity of PP2A has been reported as a recurrent alteration in many types of cancer. Here, we show that PP2A is frequently inactivated in patients with colorectal cancer, indicating that PP2A represents a potential therapeutic target for this disease. We identified overexpression of the endogenous PP2A inhibitors SET and CIP2A, and downregulation of regulatory PP2A such as PPP2R2A and PPP2R5E, as contributing mechanisms to PP2A inhibition in colorectal cancer. Moreover, we observed that its restoration using FTY720 impairs proliferation and clonogenic potential of colorectal cancer cells, induces caspase-dependent apoptosis, and affects AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 activation status. Interestingly, treatment with FTY720 showed an additive effect with 5-fluorouracil, SN-38, and oxaliplatin, drugs used in standard chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. These results suggest that PP2A activity is commonly decreased in colorectal cancer cells, and that the use of PP2A activators, such as FTY720, might represent a potential novel therapeutic strategy in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 13(4); 938–47. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is a high prevalent neoplasia characterized by a progressive accumulation of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities that lead to cancer progression. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a tumor suppressor that regulates many signaling pathways (1–3), and its loss of function has been associated with cell transformation (4–5). PP2A is not a single entity but a heterotrimeric complex consisting of a scaffold PP2A-A subunit, a catalytic PP2A-C subunit, and a regulatory PP2A-B subunit that determines both the specific substrate and the localization of the holoenzyme. Two isoforms have been described for PP2A-A and PP2A-C, and at least 26 isoforms for PP2A-B (6–7). Therefore, PP2A can form a high number of different complexes that interact with many different substrates (5).

It has been reported that transformed cells use different mechanisms to inhibit PP2A, including alterations in any of the PP2A subunits, and also the overexpression of specific endogenous inhibitors (4, 8–9). Despite PP2A has been described as a novel therapeutic target in several tumor models (10–12), the importance and potential value of PP2A as a drugable tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer remains mostly underexplored. Interestingly, there are some evidences that would suggest a relevant role of PP2A deregulation in colorectal cancer development. Alterations affecting PPP2R1B have been reported in colorectal cancer, impairing the interaction between PP2A-B and PP2A-C therefore inactivating PP2A (13–16). Furthermore, the tumor suppressor activity of PP2A seems to modulate the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to different treatments such as rapamycin (17), sphingadienes (18), or antiangiogenesis therapies (19). Therefore, we hypothesized that PP2A would be deregulated and could represent a novel targeted therapeutic strategy in colorectal cancer.

In this study, we show that PP2A activity is reduced in colorectal cancer, and overexpression of the endogenous PP2A inhibitors, SET or CIP2A, was identified as possible mechanisms of PP2A inhibition in colorectal cancer. Interestingly, FTY720 treatment increased PP2A activity, affecting proliferation and clonogenic potential of colorectal cancer cells. In addition, FTY720-induced PP2A activation led to increased apoptosis and changes in the phosphorylation status of AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1/2. Of importance, our data provide strong evidences that PP2A activation could be a promising therapeutic target in combination with drugs used in standard chemotherapy, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), SN-38, or oxaliplatin (LOHP).

Materials and Methods

Cell cultures

The human colorectal cancer cell lines RKO (ATCC CRL-2577), SW480 (ATCC CCL-228), WiDr (ATCC CCL-218), DLD-1 (ATCC CCL-221), HT-29 (ATCC HTB-38), LoVo (ATCC CCL-229), and SW620 (ATCC CCL-227) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were not cultured for more than 2 months. No authentication was done by the authors. Cell lines were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS and were grown at 37ºC in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Media were supplemented with penicillin G (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL). Cells were treated with the following reagents: 5-FU (1 μmol/L; Sigma), SN-38 (50 nmol/L; Sigma), LOHP (1 μmol/L; Sigma), FTY720 (10 μmol/L; Calbiochem), and okadaic acid (2.5 nmol/L; Calbiochem).

Patient samples

The study comprised fresh-frozen samples of 21 patients with colorectal cancer obtained from surgical specimens provided by the Biobank of Fundación Jiménez Díaz (Madrid, Spain). Paired normal mucosa obtained from each patient was used as control. A pathologist confirmed that primary tumor tissues used in this work contained more than 70% tumoral components. The Ethical Committee and Institutional Review Board approved the project.

Direct nucleotide sequencing

Reverse transcription reactions were performed using SuperScript III (Invitrogen). The amplified PCR products were purified from agarose gel after electrophoresis using Ilustra GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare), and sequencing reactions were carried out by duplicates using forward and reverse primers to confirm the results obtained and performed by the company Secugen, S.L. Results were analyzed using Chromas Version 2.4.1 and ClustalW2 bioinformatic tools.

Western blot analysis

Protein extracts were isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) following manufacturer's indications, clarified (12,000 × g, 15 minutes, 4ºC), denatured, and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Antibodies used were mouse monoclonal anti-PP2A (clone 1D6, Upstate Inc.), rabbit polyclonal anti-PP2A (FL-309; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit monoclonal anti-PP2AY307 (Epitomics), rabbit polyclonal anti-AKT, rabbit polyclonal anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology), goat polyclonal anti-SET, rabbit polyclonal anti-pAKTThr308, rabbit polyclonal anti-pERK1/2Thr202/Tyr204 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal anti-PPP2R2A (Abcam), goat polyclonal anti-PPP2R5E (Novus Biologicals), rabbit polyclonal anti-CIP2A, and mouse monoclonal anti-βactin (Sigma). Proteins were detected with the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to alkaline phospatase (Sigma) by chemiluminescence using Tropix CSPD and Tropix Nitro Block II (Applied Biosystems).

Proliferation assay and cell viability

Cell proliferation was measured in triplicate wells by MTS assay in 96-well plates using the CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega), following the manufacturer's indications.

PP2A phosphatase activity assays

PP2A assays were performed with cell lysates (50 μg) using a PP2A immunoprecipitation phosphatase assay kit (Millipore) as previously described (20).

Analysis of caspase activation

Quantification of caspase-3/7 activities in untreated or FTY720-treated colorectal cancer cells were carried out using the caspase Glo-3/7 assay kit (Promega Corp.). Briefly, 5 × 103 cells were plated in a white-walled 96-well plate, and the Z-DEVD reagent, the luminogenic caspase-3/7 substrate containing a tetrapeptide Asp-Glu-Val-Asp, was added with a 1:1 ratio of reagent to sample. After 90 minutes at room temperature, the substrate cleavage by activated caspase-3 and -7, and the intensity of a luminescent signal were measured by a FLUOstar OPTIMA luminometer (BMG Labtech). Differences in caspase-3/7 activity in FTY720-treated cells compared with untreated cells are expressed as fold-change in luminescence.

Colony-forming assay

Experiments were performed in 6-well plates coated with 3 mL of 0.6% soft agarose (Sigma) in medium. A total of 1 × 103 cells were suspended in 0.3% agarose in medium and plated in triplicates over the precoated wells. Fresh medium was supplied once a week. After 15 days, colonies were stained with MTT (M-5655, Sigma) for 4 hours at 37°C. Then, colonies were fixed by adding dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) overnight at 37°C. Colony numbers were determined from triplicates and three independent experiments were carried out for each condition and cell line.

Ex vivo models

Tissue slices, which were not needed for diagnostic purposes, from primary colorectal tumors larger than 1.5 cm of maximum diameter and normal adjacent colon mucosa were obtained from surgical specimens in patients newly diagnosed for adenocarcinoma. The samples were processed in sterile conditions immediately after surgical resection. Two slices (2 cm3) for tumor and normal mucosa were used for the present study. One of the tumor and mucosa slides (designated as control samples) were put into culture medium, and another additional tumor and mucosa slices (designated as treated samples) were put on the same culture medium plus FTY720 at 10 μmol/L. Incubation was performed in 24-well plates at 37°C in a constant atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 24 hours. At 24 hours, the specimens were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 16 hours at room temperature and embedded in paraffin under vacuum conditions. These specimens were assayed for molecular markers as described in the immunohistochemical (IHC) section.

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections (3 μm) were placed on plus charged glass slides. After deparaffinization in xylene and graded alcohols, heat antigen retrieval was performed in pH9 EDTA-based buffer (Dako). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by 0.03% hydrogen peroxide for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated with primary antibodies for 60 minutes at room temperature, followed of appropriate anti-Immunoglobulin horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polymer (Flex+, Dako). Sections were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as a chromogen. All stainings were performed in a Dako Autostainer. Sections incubated with nonimmunized serum were used as negative controls.

Results

Reduced PP2A activity and SET deregulation are common events in colorectal cancer

To evaluate the importance of PP2A in colorectal cancer, we analyzed PP2A activation status in a series of 21 patients diagnosed of colorectal cancer. Patient characteristics are indicated in Supplementary Table S1. Interestingly, we observed a significant reduction of PP2A activity in 18 out of the 21 samples analyzed (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S2). Because the 1D6 antibody against PP2A has been previously reported to recognize the demethylated fraction of PP2A (21–22), we performed these experiments with a second antibody against full-length PP2A (FL-309), and similar results were observed in all cases except for P4 who was positive for PP2A inhibition only with the FL-309 antibody (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). To investigate the possible causes of PP2A inhibition, we sequenced PPP2R1B in the 21 patients with colorectal cancer. Information about the primers used for amplifying PPP2R1B cDNA segments is indicated in the Supplementary Table S3. Two silent heterozygous alterations were found: GAC (Asp) to GAT (Asp) at codon 391 in the patient 12 (P12), and TAT (Tyr) to TAC (Tyr) at codon 72 in patient 14 (P14; Supplementary Fig. S4). However, no missense mutations were identified in our cohort. In addition, we analyzed by Western blot analysis the expression of the PP2A endogenous inhibitor SET in these patients with colorectal cancer. We found SET overexpressed in 13 out the 21 samples analyzed (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Table S2). Taken together, these results would indicate that PP2A inactivation is a common event in colorectal cancer and that deregulation of the endogenous PP2A inhibitor SET would be a key contributing mechanism to PP2A inactivation in colorectal cancer.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

PP2A shows reduced activity in patients with colorectal cancer. A, quantification of PP2A activity in patients with colorectal cancer with normal mucosa and tumor samples. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. B, Western blot analysis of SET expression in colorectal cancer patient samples; +, SET overexpression; N, normal mucosa; T, tumor sample.

CIP2A is frequently overexpressed and correlates with c-MYC levels in colorectal cancer

The fact that some of the patients included in our series showed reduced PP2A activity without displaying SET deregulation prompted us to study the presence of alternative mechanisms to inhibit PP2A in colorectal cancer. We studied the levels of CIP2A, another endogenous PP2A inhibitor recently reported as deregulated in colorectal cancer (23). Interestingly, we found CIP2A overexpressed in 15 out of 21 cases analyzed (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S2). CIP2A acts inhibiting PP2A-mediated c-MYC dephosphorylation and proteolytic degradation (24). Furthermore, CIP2A has been proposed as a key c-Myc regulator in colorectal cancer (25) and, in concordance with this point, we observed a good correlation between CIP2A and c-MYC levels in our series (Fig. 2). Therefore, these observations would suggest that CIP2A overexpression is another contributing mechanism to inhibit PP2A in colorectal cancer. To further investigate other possible mechanisms of PP2A inhibition in colorectal cancer, we analyzed by Western blot analysis, the expression of PPP2R2A and PPP2R5E. Interestingly, we found PPP2R2A downregulated in nine out of the 21 patients with colorectal cancer, and PPP2R5E downregulation in three out of 21 cases (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Fig. S5). These observations would suggest that downregulation of regulatory PP2A subunits such as PPP2R2A and PPP2R5E could be involved in the PP2A inhibition observed in colorectal cancer.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

CIP2A is overexpressed in colorectal cancer and correlates with c-MYC levels. Western blot analysis of CIP2A expression in colorectal cancer patient samples; +, CIP2A overexpression; N, normal mucosa; T, tumor sample.

PP2A activation by FTY720 reduces cell viability in colorectal cancer cells

We next performed functional analyses in a series of seven colorectal cancer cell lines to clarify the biologic relevance of PP2A deregulation in colorectal cancer. We first analyzed the PP2A status and the expression levels of SET and CIP2A in our panel of colorectal cancer cell lines observing that all of them showed PP2A inhibition together with overexpression of both SET and CIP2A in comparison with normal controls (Supplementary Fig. S6). To assess whether increased PP2A activity affects cell proliferation of colorectal cancer cells, RKO and LoVo cell lines were treated with the PP2A activator FTY720 or vehicle (DMSO). Phosphatase assays to quantify PP2A activity levels confirmed that FTY720 treatment leads to PP2A activation (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S7). In addition, we pretreated RKO and LoVo cells with the PP2A inhibitor okadaic acid for 90 minutes, followed by incubation with FTY720 or vehicle for 24 hours. FTY720-induced PP2A activity in RKO and LoVo cells was inhibited by okadaic acid (Fig. 3A). Western blot analysis showed that similar levels of PP2Ac protein were immunoprecipitated in the PP2A phosphatase assays (Fig. 3B), suggesting that differences observed in PP2A activity are not due to changes in PP2Ac expression levels. We next analyzed the effect of PP2A activation on cell growth using MTS assay. We observed a decreased proliferation in FTY720-treated RKO and LoVo cells compared with vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 3C). Similar results were obtained with the SW480, HT-29, and DLD-1 cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S8). In addition, we observed that the impaired proliferation induced by FTY720 was partially rescued by the treatment with okadaic acid used at a concentration that inhibits PP2A but no other phosphatases (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S8; ref. 26). Moreover, the images obtained after treatment with FTY720, using an optical microscope, were in concordance with the MTS results (Supplementary Fig. S9). Altogether, these results show that PP2A activation by FTY720 treatment induces toxicity in colorectal cancer cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

FTY720 treatment induces an impaired proliferation via PP2A activation. A, treatment with okadaic acid (OA) inhibits the FTY720-induced PP2A activity in RKO and LoVo cells. B, levels of immunoprecipitated PP2A (1D6 antibody) from the RKO and LoVo lysates used in the phosphatase assays. C, the impaired cell viability induced by FTY720 is partially rescued by the treatment with okadaic acid. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

FTY720 leads to an impaired clonogenic potential of colorectal cancer cells that is dependent on PP2A activation

To further confirm the importance of FTY720-modulating colorectal cancer cell proliferation, we determined the effects on colony-forming ability of FTY720 treatment in colorectal cancer cells. Interestingly, FTY720-treated RKO and LoVo cells formed a markedly reduced number of colonies than controls (Fig. 4). In concordance with the results obtained in the proliferation assays, we observed that the impaired clonogenic ability induced by FTY720 was partially rescued by the treatment with okadaic acid, indicating that this effect is at least partially promoted by PP2A activation. Similar results were also obtained with the HT-29 and DLD-1 cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S10). These results would suggest a potential therapeutic value for FTY720 treatment through PP2A activation in colorectal cancer cells.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Colony-forming ability of untreated, FTY720-treated, and FTY720/okadaic acid (OA)-treated RKO and LoVo cells. Colony-forming assay showing effects of FTY720 alone or in combination with okadaic acid in RKO and LoVo cells.

FTY720 induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells

To further investigate the biologic effect of the FTY720-induced PP2A activation in colorectal cancer, RKO cells were treated with FTY720, and then we assessed apoptosis measuring activity levels of caspase-3 and -7. Vehicle-treated cells were used as controls. Consistent with its ability to increase PP2A activity and suppress cell growth, FTY720 showed a caspase-dependent proapoptotic effect, increasing caspase activity levels almost 7-fold in FTY720-treated RKO cells compared with vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 5A). In addition, caspase activity in FTY720-treated cells was markedly reduced when cells were pretreated with okadaic acid. These results were confirmed in the LoVo cell line (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

FTY720 induces caspase-dependent apoptosis together with changes in the phosphorylation status of PP2A targets. A, caspase-3/7 assays in RKO and LoVo cells untreated (DMSO), and FTY720-treated alone or in combination with okadaic acid (OA). B, Western blot analysis showing AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and expression after FTY720 treatment in RKO and LoVo cells.

Molecular effects of PP2A activation in colorectal cancer cells after FTY720 treatment

We next analyzed by Western blot analysis whether the FTY720 treatment had any effect in the phosphorylation status of previously described PP2A targets. Consistent with previous reports about the effects of PP2A activation in other tumor models (27), FTY720 treatment decreased phosphorylation (activity) of the PP2A targets AKT and ERK1/2 without affecting their expression levels (Fig. 5B). Moreover, okadaic acid treatment rescued AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in FTY720-treated RKO cells. Similar results were observed in LoVo (Fig. 5B), HT-29, and SW480 cells (Supplementary Fig. S11). Analysis in the HT-29 cell line showed decreased phosphorylation only for ERK1/2 (Supplementary Fig. S11). Moreover, we observed that phosphorylation on tyrosine 307 of PP2Ac was not affected in cells treated with FTY720 compared with cells treated with vehicle (DMSO; Supplementary Fig. S11). Altogether, these results would indicate that the molecular mechanism of action of FTY720 involves the inhibition of AKT and ERK1/2 signaling.

We next analyzed PP2A, CIP2A, and SET levels after treatment with FTY720 alone or in combination with okadaic acid in RKO and LoVo cell lines. Interestingly, Western blot analysis showed that CIP2A decreased after FTY720 treatment and CIP2A levels were restored when cells where treated with FTY720 in combination with okadaic acid. No changes were observed in SET or PP2A expression. As expected, c-MYC levels decreased in correlation with CIP2A (Supplementary Fig. S12). Altogether, these results would describe a novel mechanism of action of FTY720 through CIP2A and c-MYC deregulation.

FTY720 potentiates antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil, SN-38, and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells

To assess the effect of a combination between standard induction chemotherapy drugs used in colorectal cancer and FTY720, we treated colorectal cancer cells with either 5-FU, SN-38, or LOHP, alone or in combination with FTY720. Of importance, we observed that FTY720 enhanced the antitumor effects mediated by 5-FU (Fig. 6A), SN-38 (Fig. 6B), and LOHP (Fig. 6C) treatments in the RKO and LoVo cell lines. These data were also confirmed in DLD-1 (Supplementary Fig. S13) and HT-29 cells (Supplementary Fig. S14). Therefore, these results showed that FTY720 treatment has an additive antitumor effect when combined with either 5-FU, SN-38, or LOHP in colorectal cancer cells.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

FTY720 treatment shows an additive effect with 5-FU, SN-38, and LOHP treatments in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. MTS assays showing the effect of FTY720 and 5-FU (A), SN-38 (B) or LOHP (C) alone or in combination in RKO and LoVo cells. Cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) were used as controls. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

FTY720 shows therapeutic effects in human colorectal cancer ex vivo models

To further investigate the potential therapeutic effects of FTY720 in colorectal cancer and assess cytotoxicity of this drug in normal colon cells, we performed human colorectal cancer ex vivo models using five primary colorectal cancer tumors that were obtained from surgical specimens of patients newly diagnosed for adenocarcinoma. IHC analysis comparing samples of normal colonic mucosa and colorectal cancer from the same patient showed that FTY720 treatment induces an increased apoptosis (cleaved caspase-3) together with decreased proliferation (Ki-67) in tumor samples, whereas no significant changes were observed in control samples (Supplementary Fig. S15). These observations would support the observations made in vitro and indicate that cytotoxic effects of FTY720 are markedly reduced in normal colon cells.

Discussion

PP2A is a human tumor suppressor that regulates the activity of several signaling proteins critical for malignant cell behavior. We report here that PP2A is frequently inactivated in colorectal cancer cell lines and patient samples. In addition, we demonstrate that FTY720-induced PP2A activation leads to cell growth inhibition, impaired clonogenic potential, caspase-dependent apoptosis, and changes in the activation status of downstream targets such as AKT and ERK1/2. Importantly, FTY720 treatment shows an additive effect with the chemotherapy reagents 5-FU, SN-38, and LOHP, suggesting that treatment with PP2A activators could be a novel therapeutic option in colorectal cancer in combination with standard chemotherapy.

To evaluate the importance of PP2A deregulation in colorectal cancer, we quantified PP2A activity levels in 21 patients with colorectal cancer (paired normal mucosa and tumor samples), observing a reduced PP2A activity in 19 out of 21 colorectal cancer patient samples (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Table S2). PP2A assays were carried out with two different antibodies against PP2A (1D6 and FL-309) that showed similar results in all cases except in P4 (PP2A inhibition only with FL-309). Although the FL-309 antibody recognizes the full-length PP2A, the 1D6 antibody has been reported to preferentially recognize the demethylated fraction of PP2A (21–22), and this could be an explanation for the discrepancy observed in this case P4 between the PP2A assays performed with these antibodies (Supplementary Table S2). To determine the molecular mechanisms responsible of this PP2A inhibition in colorectal cancer, we sequenced PPP2R1B but no missense mutations were found in our cohort. These results would confirm previous works reporting that cancer-associated mutations affecting the PPP2R1B gene are rare events in colorectal cancer (13–16). We then decided to assess the expression levels of the PP2A endogenous inhibitors SET and CIP2A, observing deregulation of SET in 13 out of 21 cases, and overexpression of CIP2A in 15 out of 21 colorectal cancer patient samples (Figs. 1B and 2), which indicates that these alterations are recurrent events in colorectal cancer. Very interestingly, we observed no alterations in SET and/or CIP2A in our colorectal cancer cases without PP2A inhibition. Moreover, of 19 patients with reduced PP2A activity, six cases showed CIP2A overexpression, four SET overexpression, and nine both SET and CIP2A deregulation (Supplementary Table S2). Data of PP2A activity, SET expression, and CIP2A expression status have been indicated for each patient in the Supplementary Table S2. CIP2A is a protein that inhibits PP2A-mediated c-MYC dephosphorylation and proteolytic degradation then increasing c-MYC protein stability (24). In addition, it has been reported that CIP2A overexpression is associated with c-MYC expression in colorectal cancer (25), and we showed a correlation between CIP2A and c-MYC levels (Fig. 2) that would confirm the previous observations made by Böckelman and colleagues. Thoroughly, these results would indicate that overexpression of SET and CIP2A are contributing mechanisms that could cooperate simultaneously to inhibit PP2A in colorectal cancer.

Together with the overexpression of endogenous PP2A inhibitors and cancer-associated mutations affecting structural PP2A subunits, downregulation of regulatory PP2A subunits has been described as a mechanism to inactivate PP2A in cancer cells (4, 9). Thus, we analyzed PPP2R2A and PPP2R5E, two regulatory PP2A subunits recently implicated in cancer (28–29) observing downregulation of these subunits in, respectively, nine and three out of the 21 colorectal cancer cases (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Fig. S5). These alterations could contribute to explain some of the differences observed in the PP2A activity levels of the patients with colorectal cancer. However, PP2A constitutes a large family of serine/threonine phosphatases, and in this work, we have only tested some of the potential mechanisms to inhibit PP2A. Although the catalytic and the scaffold subunits have two different variants, four unrelated families of PP2A regulatory subunits have been identified, including at least 26 different alternative transcripts and splice forms (5). Thus, PP2A has the ability to form a high number of different complexes with an also high number of potential alterations that could contribute to PP2A inhibition affecting any of these PP2A subunits. In fact, the cancerous cell shows a wide variety of molecular strategies to inhibit PP2A, including hyperphosphorylation or downregulation of its catalytic subunit, mutations or downregulation affecting any of the scaffold or regulatory subunits, and the overexpression of endogenous PP2A inhibitors such as SET or CIP2A, but also others such as SETBP1 or SRC (20, 30). Therefore, further investigation would be necessary to clarify the particular importance of each mechanism and to identify other potential mechanisms involved in the PP2A inactivation observed in colorectal cancer.

To assess the potential therapeutic value of PP2A activation, we used FTY720 to treat colorectal cancer cells. FTY720 is an immunosuppressor and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for multiple sclerosis treatment. Interestingly, FTY720 has shown antitumor properties in several cancers. We considered this drug to treat colorectal cancer because together with its FDA approbation, Nagaoka and colleagues studied the effect of FTY720 phosphorylation in breast and colon cancer, observing an anticancer activity against two colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT-116 and SW620; ref. 31). In addition, the pharmacologic activation of PP2A using FTY720 has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative for future treatments in patients with some leukemias (27, 32). Interestingly, it has been recently reported that FTY720 targets SET and then mediates tumor suppression via PP2A activation in lung cancer (33). Our results show that PP2A inhibition plays an important role in colorectal cancer transformation because the pharmacologic activation of PP2A in vitro and ex vivo using FTY720 reverses some of the malignant features of the colorectal cancer cells, whereas cytotoxic effects seem to be markedly impaired in normal colon cells (Figs. 3–5 and Supplementary Fig. S15). Moreover, we observed that the molecular mechanism by which FTY720 is acting involves the inhibition of the AKT and ERK1/2 (Fig. 5B), both PP2A targets, suggesting that this effect occurs via PP2A activation. In fact, we showed PP2A activation after FTY720 treatment but, unexpectedly, we did not observe any change in the PP2A phosphorylation levels (Supplementary Fig. S11), indicating that FTY720 activates PP2A by a mechanism alternative to the tyrosine-307 dephosphorylation. Interestingly, we observed that FTY720 led to decreased CIP2A levels (Supplementary Fig. S12), which indicates that in addition to its recently reported blockade of SET (33), FTY720 could be acting decreasing CIP2A expression. Indeed, these two events are in concordance with the PP2A activation observed after the FTY720 treatment because SET and CIP2A are two endogenous PP2A inhibitors. Furthermore, our results also showed that FTY720 exhibits additive antitumor effects with reagents used in standard chemotherapy such as 5-FU, SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan), and LOHP (Fig. 6), suggesting that FTY720 is a good candidate for future trials in combination with standard chemotherapy reagents in patients with colorectal cancer.

In conclusion, we report that functional inactivation of PP2A is a common event in colorectal cancer. In addition, we show that functional loss of PP2A activity occurs through contributing mechanisms such as overexpression of the PP2A endogenous inhibitors, SET and CIP2A, and downregulation of the regulatory PP2A subunits, PPP2R2A and PPP2R5E. Moreover, the potent antitumor effects observed after restoration of PP2A activity with FTY720 indicates that PP2A inhibition is an alteration with high relevance in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Finally, the fact that FTY720 treatment has shown an additive effect to chemotherapy drugs highlights PP2A as a molecular target with a potential value in therapies combined with PP2A activators in colorectal cancer.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: I. Cristobal, C. Carames, O. Aguilera, J. Madoz-Gurpide, F. Rojo, J. Garcia-Foncillas

Development of methodology: I. Cristobal, R. Manso, R. Rincon, C. Carames, C. Senin, A. Borrero, J. Martinez-Useros

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): R. Rincon, C. Carames, C. Senin, S. Zazo, F. Rojo

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): I. Cristobal, R. Manso, R. Rincon, C. Carames, C. Senin, F. Rojo, J. Garcia-Foncillas

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: I. Cristobal, C. Carames, O. Aguilera, J. Madoz-Gurpide, F. Rojo, J. Garcia-Foncillas

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): R. Manso, R. Rincon, C. Senin, M. Rodriguez, F. Rojo

Study supervision: I. Cristobal, J. Garcia-Foncillas

Grant Support

This work was supported by Biobank of Fundación Jiménez Díaz (FJD Biobank) grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER; RD09/0076/00101. R. Manso was supported by Fundacion Conchita Rabago de Jiménez Diaz.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Monica Martinez and Carmen Cañadas for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received February 27, 2013.
  • Revision received December 3, 2013.
  • Accepted January 9, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Janssens V,
    2. Goris J
    . Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem J 2001;353:417–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Janssens V,
    2. Goris J,
    3. Van Hoof C
    . PP2A: the expected tumor suppressor. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005;15:34–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mumby M
    . PP2A: unveiling a reluctant tumor suppressor. Cell 2007;130:21–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Westermarck J,
    2. Hahn WC
    . Multiple pathways regulated by the tumor suppressor PP2A in transformation. Trends Mol Med 2008;14:152–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Eichhorn PJ,
    2. Creyghton MP,
    3. Bernards R
    . Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunits and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1795:1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Pham HT,
    3. Ruediger R,
    4. Walter G
    . Characterization of the Aalpha and Abeta subunit isoforms of protein phosphatase 2A: differences in expression, subunit interaction, and evolution. Biochem J 2003;369:387–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Arino J,
    2. Woon CW,
    3. Brautigan DL,
    4. Miller TB Jr.,
    5. Johnson GL
    . Human liver phosphatase 2A: cDNA and amino acid sequence of two catalytic subunit isotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;85:4252–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Martin BL,
    3. Brautigan DL
    . Regulation of protein serine-threonine phosphatase type-2A by tyrosine phosphorylation. Science 1992;257:1261–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cristobal I,
    2. Garcia-Orti L,
    3. Cirauqui C,
    4. Alonso MM,
    5. Calasanz MJ,
    6. Odero MD
    . PP2A impaired activity is a common event in acute myeloid leukemia and its activation by forskolin has a potent anti-leukemic effect. Leukemia 2011;25:606–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Perrotti D,
    2. Neviani P
    . Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a drugable tumor suppressor in Ph1(+) leukemias. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2008;27:159–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Voronkov M,
    2. Braithwaite SP,
    3. Stock JB
    . Phosphoprotein phosphatase 2A: a novel druggable target for Alzheimer's disease. Future Med Chem 2011;3:821–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kalev P,
    2. Sablina AA
    . Protein phosphatase 2A as a potential target for anticancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2011;11:38–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wang SS,
    2. Esplin ED,
    3. Li JL,
    4. Huang L,
    5. Gazdar A,
    6. Minna J,
    7. et al.
    Alterations of the PPP2R1B gene in human lung and colon cancer. Science 1998;282:284–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Takagi Y,
    2. Futamura M,
    3. Yamaguchi K,
    4. Aoki S,
    5. Takahashi T,
    6. Saji S
    . Alterations of the PPP2R1B gene located at 11q23 in human colorectal cancers. Gut 2000;47:268–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ruediger R,
    2. Pham HT,
    3. Walter G
    . Alterations in protein phosphatase 2A subunit interaction in human carcinomas of the lung and colon with mutations in the A beta subunit gene. Oncogene 2001;20:1892–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tamaki M,
    2. Goi T,
    3. Hirono Y,
    4. Katayama K,
    5. Yamaguchi A
    . PPP2R1B gene alterations inhibit interaction of PP2A-Abeta and PP2A-C proteins in colorectal cancers. Oncol Rep 2004;11:655–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tan J,
    2. Lee PL,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Lim YC,
    5. Hooi SC,
    6. et al.
    B55β-associated PP2A complex controls PDK1-directed myc signaling and modulates rapamycin sensitivity in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell 2010;18:459–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kumar A,
    2. Pandurangan AK,
    3. Lu F,
    4. Fyrst H,
    5. Zhang M,
    6. Byun HS,
    7. et al.
    Chemopreventive sphingadienes downregulate Wnt signaling via a PP2A/Akt/GSK3β pathway in colon cancer. Carcinogenesis 2012;33:1726–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lin SP,
    2. Lee YT,
    3. Yang SH,
    4. Miller SA,
    5. Chiou SH,
    6. Hung MC,
    7. et al.
    Colon cancer stem cells resist antiangiogenesis therapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Lett 2013;328:226–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cristobal I,
    2. Blanco FJ,
    3. Garcia-Orti L,
    4. Marcotegui N,
    5. Vicente C,
    6. Rifon J,
    7. et al.
    SETBP1 overexpression is a novel leukemogenic mechanism that predicts adverse outcome in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010;115:615–625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wei H,
    2. Ashby DG,
    3. Moreno CS,
    4. Ogris E,
    5. Yeong FM,
    6. Corbett AH,
    7. et al.
    Carboxymethylation of the PP2A catalytic subunit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for efficient interaction with the B-type subunits Cdc55p and Rts1p. J Biol Chem 2001;276:1570–1577.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. MacKay KB,
    2. Tu Y,
    3. Clarke SG
    . Circumventing embryonic lethality with Lcmt1 deficiency: generation of hypomorphic Lcmt1 mice with reduced protein phosphatase 2A methyltransferase expression and defects in insulin signaling. PLoS One 2013;8:e65967.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Teng HW,
    2. Yang SH,
    3. Lin JK,
    4. Chen WS,
    5. Lin TC,
    6. Jiang JK,
    7. et al.
    CIP2A is a predictor of poor prognosis in colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1037–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Junttila MR,
    2. Westermarck J
    . Mechanisms of MYC stabilization in human malignancies. Cell Cycle 2008;7:592–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Böckelman C,
    2. Koskensalo S,
    3. Hagström J,
    4. Lundin M,
    5. Ristimäki A,
    6. Haglund C
    . CIP2A overexpression is associated with c-Myc expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2012;13:289–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Saydam G,
    2. Aydin HH,
    3. Sahin F,
    4. Selvi N,
    5. Oktem G,
    6. Terzioglu E,
    7. et al.
    Involvement of protein phosphatase 2A in interferon-alpha-2b-induced apoptosis in K562 human chronic myelogenous leukaemia cells. Leuk Res 2003;27:709–717.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Neviani P,
    2. Santhanam R,
    3. Oaks JJ,
    4. Eiring AM,
    5. Notari M,
    6. Blaser BW,
    7. et al.
    FTY720, a new alternative for treating blast crisis chronic myelogenous leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Invest 2007;117:2408–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kalev P,
    2. Simicek M,
    3. Vazquez I,
    4. Munck S,
    5. Chen L,
    6. Soin T,
    7. et al.
    Loss of PPP2R2A inhibits homologous recombination DNA repair and predicts tumor sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Cancer Res 2012;72:6414–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Cristobal I,
    2. Cirauqui C,
    3. Castello-Cross R,
    4. Garcia-Orti L,
    5. Calasanz MJ,
    6. Odero MD
    . Downregulation of PPP2R5E is a common event in acute myeloid leukemia that affects the oncogenic potential of leukemic cells. Haematologica 2013;98:e103–104.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Barisic S,
    2. Schmidt C,
    3. Walczak H,
    4. Kulms D
    . Tyrosine phosphatase inhibition triggers sustained canonical serine-dependent NFkappaB activation via Src-dependent blockade of PP2A. Biochem Pharmacol 2010;80:439–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Nagaoka Y,
    2. Otsuki K,
    3. Fujita T,
    4. Uesato S
    . Effects of Phosphorylation of Immunomodulatory Agent FTY720 (Fingolimod) on Antiproliferative Activity against Breast and Colon Cancer Cells. Biol Pharm Bull 2008;31:1177–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Liu Q,
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Frissora F,
    4. Ma Y,
    5. Santhanam R,
    6. Jarjoura D,
    7. et al.
    FTY720 demonstrates promising preclinical activity for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Blood 2008;111:275–284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Saddoughi SA,
    2. Gencer S,
    3. Peterson YK,
    4. Ward KE,
    5. Mukhopadhyay A,
    6. Oaks J,
    7. et al.
    Sphingosine analogue drug FTY720 targets I2PP2A/SET and mediates lung tumour suppression via activation of PP2A-RIPK1-dependent necroptosis. EMBO Mol Med 2013;5:105–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 13 (4)
April 2014
Volume 13, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PP2A Inhibition Is a Common Event in Colorectal Cancer and Its Restoration Using FTY720 Shows Promising Therapeutic Potential
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
PP2A Inhibition Is a Common Event in Colorectal Cancer and Its Restoration Using FTY720 Shows Promising Therapeutic Potential
Ion Cristóbal, Rebeca Manso, Raúl Rincón, Cristina Caramés, Clara Senin, Aurea Borrero, Javier Martínez-Useros, María Rodriguez, Sandra Zazo, Oscar Aguilera, Juan Madoz-Gúrpide, Federico Rojo and Jesús García-Foncillas
Mol Cancer Ther April 1 2014 (13) (4) 938-947; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0150

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PP2A Inhibition Is a Common Event in Colorectal Cancer and Its Restoration Using FTY720 Shows Promising Therapeutic Potential
Ion Cristóbal, Rebeca Manso, Raúl Rincón, Cristina Caramés, Clara Senin, Aurea Borrero, Javier Martínez-Useros, María Rodriguez, Sandra Zazo, Oscar Aguilera, Juan Madoz-Gúrpide, Federico Rojo and Jesús García-Foncillas
Mol Cancer Ther April 1 2014 (13) (4) 938-947; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0150
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Ormeloxifene and Prostate Cancer
  • Proinflammatory Cytokines and Drug Resistance
  • ABCB1 Confers Cross-Resistance to Cabazitaxel and Docetaxel
Show more Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement