Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction

Synuclein γ Compromises Spindle Assembly Checkpoint and Renders Resistance to Antimicrotubule Drugs

Suyu Miao, Kejin Wu, Bo Zhang, Ziyi Weng, Mingjie Zhu, Yunshu Lu, Ramadas Krishna and Yuenian Eric Shi
Suyu Miao
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kejin Wu
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Zhang
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ziyi Weng
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mingjie Zhu
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunshu Lu
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramadas Krishna
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuenian Eric Shi
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
1Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Departments of 2General Surgery and 3Pathology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; 4Centre for Bioinformatics, School of Life Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India; and 5The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0671 Published March 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    SNCG renders a drug resistance. A, effect of SNCG on docetaxel resistance in breast cancer cells. SNCG-negative MCF-7 and MCF-neo1 (vector transfect clone), SNCG stably transfected MCF-S2 and MCF-S6 cells (top); SNCG-negative MDA-MB-435 and neo-435-1 (vector-transfected clone), and SNCG stably transfected SNCG-435-3 cells (bottom) were treated with or without 100 nmol/L docetaxel for 2 days and apoptotic cells were determined. The numbers represent means ± SD of three cultures. Statistical comparisons of treated versus control indicate P < 0.001. B, effects on apoptotic biomarkers. MCF-7 and MCF-S6 cells were treated with or without docetaxel (100 nmol/L, 48 hours). Equal amount of total cellular protein was subjected to Western blot analyses of PARP, cleaved PARP, and actin. C and D, effects of knockdown SNCG expression on SKBR-3 (C) and MDA-MB-231 (D) cells on docetaxel resistance. Inserts indicate the reduced SNCG expression in the siRNA knockdown cells. Cells were treated and analyzed as described for MCF-7 and MDA-MB-435 cells. E, effects of SNCG on nocodazole resistance. MDA-MB-435 and SNCG-435-3 cells were treated with nocodazole (0.5 μmol/L, 30 hours) followed by analysis of apoptosis. F and H, SNCG renders tumor resistance to docetaxel. Tumor growths of MDA-MB-435 (F) and MCF-7 (H) xenografts in response to docetaxel treatment. Tumor cell injection and estrogen supplement (for MCF-7 cells) have been described in Materials and Methods. Mice bearing established tumors were treated with either vehicle control or docetaxel (25 mg/kg, i.p., one time per 5 days for 25 days). All mice were sacrificed at day 25 following the first drug treatment. Statistical comparison for tumor sizes in docetaxel-treated SNCG-negative MDA-MD-435 and 435-neo-1 mice relative to mice in other groups indicates P < 0.01. Statistical comparison for tumor sizes in docetaxel-treated MCF-7 mice relative to mice in other groups indicates P < 0.005. G and I, effects of SNCG on apoptosis of MDA-MB-435 (G) and MCF-7 (I) tumor xenografts. Histologic sections of tumors from docetaxel-treated or control mice were analyzed for apoptosis (TUNEL assay). Statistical analysis showed that docetaxel-treated SNCG-expressing tumor tissues had a significantly lower percentage of TUNEL-positive cells than did docetaxel-treated SNCG-negative tumor tissues (P < 0.01).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Structure analyses of the in silico interaction between BubR1 with C-terminal region of SNCG. A, docked interacting conformation of BubR1 [determined by X-ray crystallography (36)] with the in silico predicted structure of SNCG-C terminal region (blue). A1 and A2, the interaction mode between the residues of BubR1 (yellow) involved in binding with SNCG (sky blue), which influence the displacement in the GIG motif-1 (A1) and those that cause the structural transition 1 (A2). B, structural superimposition of native BubR1 X-ray crystallographic structure (green) with the structure obtained after docking with C-terminal region of SNCG (chocolate brown). C, displacement in the position of GIG motif of BubR1 (green) compared with that of native BubR1 structure (red). D, structural change occurred in the BubR1 [Gln110-Pro119; blue] compared with that of native BubR1 structure (green). E, structural displacement occurred in the region [Pro74-Ala108] of BubR1 (violet purple) with native BubR1 structure (lemon green).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effects of SNCG C-terminal on interaction with BubR1 and drug resistance. MCF-7 cells, engineered to express either full-length F-SNCG or C-terminal–deleted D-SNCG (AA 106–127 deleted), were selected for stable clones. A, effects on interaction with BubR1. F-SNCG- and D-SNCG–transfected MCF-7 cells were treated with docetaxel (80 nmol/L, 20 hours), extracts were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal SNCG antibody, and blotted with BubR1 antibody. Total cellular (before immunoprecipitation) proteins of SNCG, BubR1, and actin were also analyzed as inputs. B, in vitro effect of SNCG on docetaxel resistance. SNCG-negative parental MCF-7 and neo-transfected control MCF-neo1 cells (vector-transfected clone), F-SNCG stably transfected MCF-S6 cells, and D-SNCG stably transfected MCF-D2 and MCF-D6 cells were treated with or without 100 nmol/L docetaxel for 2 days and apoptotic cells were determined. The numbers represent means ± SD of three cultures. Statistical comparisons of treated versus control indicate P < 0.001. C, in vivo effect of SNCG on docetaxel resistance in tumor xenograft model. Tumor cell injection and estrogen supplement have been described in Materials and Methods. Mice bearing established MCF-7, MCF-S6, and MCF-D2 tumors were treated with either vehicle control or docetaxel (25 mg/kg, i.p., one time per 5-days for 25 days). All mice were sacrificed at day 25 following the first drug treatment. Statistical comparison for tumor sizes in docetaxel-treated SNCG-negative MCF-7 and D-SNCG stably transfected MCF-D2 mice relative to mice in other groups indicates P < 0.01. IP, immunuprecipitation.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    SNCG binds to BubR1, compromises BubR1 interaction with Cdc20 and Mad2, and inhibits BubR1 kinase activity. A and B, effects of SNCG on BubR1′s interaction with Cdc20 and Mad2 in MCF-7 (A) and MDA-MB-231 (B) cells. MCF-7 (parental and MCF-S6) and MDA-MB-231 (control siRNA and SNCG siRNA) cells were treated with docetaxel (80 nmol/L, 20 hours) and extracts were immunoprecipitated with SNCG, Cdc20, and Mad2 and blotted with BubR1 antibody. Total cellular (before immunoprecipitation) proteins of BubR1, SNCG, Cdc20, and actin were also analyzed as inputs. C, MCF-7 cells, engineered to express full-length F-SNCG and C-terminal–deleted D-SNCG (AA 106–127 deleted), were treated with docetaxel (80 nmol/L, 20 hours) and extracts were immunoprecipitated with BubR1 and blotted with Cdc20 antibody. D, expression of SNCG in MCF-7 cells correlates with reduced SAC kinase activity. Levels of phospho-BubR1 (P) and phospho-histone H3 (p-his3; representing SAC kinase activity in vivo) were determined by Western blotting on extracts from MCF-7 and MCF-S6 cells treated with or without docetaxel (80 nmol/L. 20 hours). E, SNCG inhibits BubR1 kinase activity in vitro. MCF-7 and MCF-S6 cells were treated with 80 nmol/L docetaxel for 20 hours. Endogenous BubR1 was immunoprecipitated from docetaxel-arrested cells and immunoblotted with anti-BubR1 antibody or kinase activity assayed after addition of histone H1 and [32P]ATP. F, overexpression of BubR1 restored the mitotic checkpoint control. MCF-neo1 and MCF-S6 cells were transfected with pCS2-BubR1 or control vector. At 30 hours posttransfection, cells were treated with DMSO or 80 nmol/L docetaxel for 20 hours. For each cell line, 200 to 300 cells randomly chosen from five different views were scored for mitotic arrest based on MPM-2 immunoreactivity. We examined the status of phosphoproteins that are specifically recognized by MPM-2 antibody and found only in mitotic phase cells using flow cytometer. Data are expressed as percentage of MPM-2–reactive cells in the propidium iodide (PI)–positive population. The numbers represent means ± SD of three cultures. A representative experiment is shown. IP, immunoprecipitation.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    SNCG renders lower mitotic index. Cells from MCF-7 (A), MDA-MB-435 (B), SKBR3 (C), and MDA-MB-231 (D) were cultured in cover slips inserted into wells of 24-well culture plates and treated with DMSO or 80 nmol/L docetaxel for 20 hours. Data are expressed as percentage of MPM-2–reactive cells in the propidium iodide (PI)–positive population as described in Fig. 4. The numbers represent means ± SD of three cultures.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A and B, representative SNCG immunohistochemical stainings for SNCG- and SNCG+++ tumors. Sections were immunohistochemically stained with specific anti-SNCG antibody with brown color indicating SNCG protein expression in breast cancer cells. All sections were also counterstained lightly with hematoxylin for viewing non-SNCG-stained cells. A serial slide from the same block was also incubated with nonimmunized control immunoglobulin G (IgG), and no detectable background staining was observed. C, individual changes in apoptotic index at pretreatment and posttreatment of docetaxel and epirubine for patients with SNCG-negative and SNGC-positive tumors.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Cytotoxicity of docetaxel

    Cell linesSNCG expression statusCytotoxicity IC50
    MCF-7Negative27
    MCF-S6Transfected89
    MDA-MB-435Negative63
    SNCG-435-3Transfected153
    T47DPositive68
    AS-3Knockdown29

    NOTE: Stable SNCG-transfected MCF-7 (MCF-S6), MDA-MB-435 (SNCG-435-3), and SNCG knockdown T47D (AS-3) cells were previously established. All six cell lines were treated with docetaxel (ranging from 10 to 250 nmol/L) for 24 hours. Cytotoxicity was measured by the MTT assay. The IC50 values were defined as the concentration of drug eliciting 50% cell killing and determined by regression analysis.

    • Table 2.

      Changes of tumor size, Ki67 expression, and apoptotic index

      PrechemotherapyPostchemotherapytP
      Size (cm)
       SNCG+5.94 ± 1.764.17 ± 1.105.970.000
       SNCG−6.17 ± 1.643.00 ± 0.957.820.000
       t−0.3473.000
       P0.7310.006
      Ki67 (%)
       SNCG+26.67 ± 18.5520.56 ± 11.490.090.052
       SNCG−32.50 ± 14.8514.17 ± 9.734.260.001
       t−0.9101.582
       P0.3700.125
      Apoptotic index (%)
       SNCG+8.17 ± 6.6410.56 ± 8.12−0.840.411
       SNCG−11.83 ± 8.7925.92 ± 19.62−2.690.021
       t−1.301−2.569
       P0.2040.023
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 13 (3)
    March 2014
    Volume 13, Issue 3
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

    NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Synuclein γ Compromises Spindle Assembly Checkpoint and Renders Resistance to Antimicrotubule Drugs
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
    (Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Synuclein γ Compromises Spindle Assembly Checkpoint and Renders Resistance to Antimicrotubule Drugs
    Suyu Miao, Kejin Wu, Bo Zhang, Ziyi Weng, Mingjie Zhu, Yunshu Lu, Ramadas Krishna and Yuenian Eric Shi
    Mol Cancer Ther March 1 2014 (13) (3) 699-713; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0671

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Synuclein γ Compromises Spindle Assembly Checkpoint and Renders Resistance to Antimicrotubule Drugs
    Suyu Miao, Kejin Wu, Bo Zhang, Ziyi Weng, Mingjie Zhu, Yunshu Lu, Ramadas Krishna and Yuenian Eric Shi
    Mol Cancer Ther March 1 2014 (13) (3) 699-713; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0671
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Materials and Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
      • Authors' Contributions
      • Grant Support
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Ormeloxifene and Prostate Cancer
    • Proinflammatory Cytokines and Drug Resistance
    • ABCB1 Confers Cross-Resistance to Cabazitaxel and Docetaxel
    Show more Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction
    • Home
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

    Articles

    • Online First
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts

    Info for

    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians

    About MCT

    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    AACR logo

    Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
    eISSN: 1538-8514
    ISSN: 1535-7163

    Advertisement