Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Small Molecule Therapeutics

Characterization of LY2228820 Dimesylate, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of p38 MAPK with Antitumor Activity

Robert M. Campbell, Bryan D. Anderson, Nathan A. Brooks, Harold B. Brooks, Edward M. Chan, Alfonso De Dios, Raymond Gilmour, Jeremy R. Graff, Enrique Jambrina, Mary Mader, Denis McCann, Songqing Na, Stephen H. Parsons, Susan E. Pratt, Chuan Shih, Louis F. Stancato, James J. Starling, Courtney Tate, Juan A. Velasco, Yong Wang and Xiang S. Ye
Robert M. Campbell
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan D. Anderson
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan A. Brooks
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harold B. Brooks
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward M. Chan
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfonso De Dios
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond Gilmour
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy R. Graff
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrique Jambrina
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Mader
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denis McCann
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Songqing Na
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen H. Parsons
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan E. Pratt
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chuan Shih
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis F. Stancato
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James J. Starling
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Tate
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan A. Velasco
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong Wang
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiang S. Ye
1Lilly Research Labs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 2Eli Lilly & Company, Alcobendas, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0513 Published February 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is activated in cancer cells in response to environmental factors, oncogenic stress, radiation, and chemotherapy. p38α MAPK phosphorylates a number of substrates, including MAPKAP-K2 (MK2), and regulates the production of cytokines in the tumor microenvironment, such as TNF-α, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and CXCL8 (IL-8). p38α MAPK is highly expressed in human cancers and may play a role in tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. LY2228820 dimesylate (hereafter LY2228820), a trisubstituted imidazole derivative, is a potent and selective, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the α- and β-isoforms of p38 MAPK in vitro (IC50 = 5.3 and 3.2 nmol/L, respectively). In cell-based assays, LY2228820 potently and selectively inhibited phosphorylation of MK2 (Thr334) in anisomycin-stimulated HeLa cells (at 9.8 nmol/L by Western blot analysis) and anisomycin-induced mouse RAW264.7 macrophages (IC50 = 35.3 nmol/L) with no changes in phosphorylation of p38α MAPK, JNK, ERK1/2, c-Jun, ATF2, or c-Myc ≤ 10 μmol/L. LY2228820 also reduced TNF-α secretion by lipopolysaccharide/IFN-γ–stimulated macrophages (IC50 = 6.3 nmol/L). In mice transplanted with B16-F10 melanoma, tumor phospho-MK2 (p-MK2) was inhibited by LY2228820 in a dose-dependent manner [threshold effective dose (TED)70 = 11.2 mg/kg]. Significant target inhibition (>40% reduction in p-MK2) was maintained for 4 to 8 hours following a single 10 mg/kg oral dose. LY2228820 produced significant tumor growth delay in multiple in vivo cancer models (melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, ovarian, glioma, myeloma, breast). In summary, LY2228820 is a p38 MAPK inhibitor, which has been optimized for potency, selectivity, drug-like properties (such as oral bioavailability), and efficacy in animal models of human cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 13(2); 364–74. ©2013 AACR.

Introduction

p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; α, β, δ, and γ isoforms) is a member of the MAPK family, which also includes JNK and ERK (1). The α-isoform of p38, known as p38α MAPK or MAPK14, is activated in response to environmental factors such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cytokines, heat/osmotic shock, radiation, and chemotherapy (2). Activation is accomplished by phosphorylation of the Thr180 and Tyr182 residues by upstream MAPK kinases, including MKK3 and MKK6 (3). p38α MAPK phosphorylates a number of substrates, including MAPKAP-K2 (MK2), which then phosphorylates tristetraprolin, regulating the posttranslational processing of various proteins (4).

p38 MAPK plays a key regulatory role in the production of cytokines such as TNF-α, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and IL-8 (CXCL8; refs. 4–6). Given the critical role of p38α MAPK in regulating these cytokines, there is keen interest in identifying p38 MAPK inhibitors for use in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, and the pain associated with inflammation (7, 8). The role of inflammation in cancer initiation and progression has been widely studied. Soluble factors produced by the tumor and by the tumor microenvironment (TME) can activate p38 MAPK and promote tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to anticancer agents (2, 6, 9, 10). For example, tumor-infiltrating macrophages, which possess abundant amounts of activated p38α MAPK, are associated with adverse prognosis in cancer (11, 12). We have previously shown that pharmacologic inhibition of p38 MAPK activity in tumor-infiltrating macrophages in vivo is associated with an antitumor effect (13). Similarly, IL-6 and CXCL8 have proliferative and proangiogenic properties; importantly, elevated levels of these cytokines are correlated with poor prognosis in breast and ovarian cancers (14, 15).

The actions of p38 MAPK in cancer involve aberrant interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment, and these interactions may differ among tumor types. There are data that support both direct (tumor-mediated) and indirect (via TME) modes of action for p38 MAPK in oncogenesis with a complex interplay between the two likely important for disease progression. For example, both melanoma cells and the associated tumor-infiltrating leukocytes secrete abundant amounts of cytokines (such as IL-1, IL-6, CXCL8, and Gro-α), which are known to promote angiogenesis, growth, invasion, and metastasis (16–20). Ovarian cancer cells produce TNF-α and CXCL8 upon p38α MAPK activation, and these cytokines may act in an autocrine manner to promote peritoneal colonization and tumor vascularization (21). The U-87MG glioma, A-2780 and SK-OV-3 ovarian cancers, and PC3 prostate cancer all secrete VEGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), EGF, and IL-6; and importantly, secretion of these cytokines can be significantly reduced by p38 MAPK inhibition (6, 22). Furthermore, pretreatment of tumor cells with LY2228820 or p38α MAPK short hairpin RNA (shRNA) reduces cord formation in a tumor/adipocyte-derived stem/endothelial colony-forming cell coculture system, supporting a p38 MAPK–mediated effect of the tumor on the TME (6).

p38 MAPK activity also influences TME biology, an often overlooked aspect of cancer therapy, but one that likely plays a profound role in tumor-host dynamics. In multiple myeloma, p38 MAPK inhibitors downregulate IL-6 secretion by bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), inhibit myeloma cell proliferation (23–26), and reduce osteoclastic bone destruction (24, 27). Inhibition of p38 MAPK also reduces production of VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor by BMSCs in vitro (28). In response to neutrophil elastase, lung cancer cells produce CXCL8, which stimulates the growth of lung cancer cells in vitro (29–31) in a p38α MAPK-dependent manner, indicating that neutrophils in the TME may activate the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in tumor cells to promote lung cancer growth (32). Furthermore, secretion of CXCL8 by both the tumor and TME increases proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo (30, 32). IL-6, secreted from adipose stromal cells to promote migration and invasion of breast cancer cells (33), likely requires p38 MAPK because its direct substrate, MK2, contributes to IL-6 mRNA stabilization (34). Finally, from the perspective of immune surveillance, activation of p38 MAPK is associated with enhanced dendritic cell tolerance during melanoma progression (35). Conversely, p38 MAPK inhibition restores the function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells in myeloma, limiting evasion of the tumor from immune surveillance (36).

Given the substantial body of evidence supporting a role for p38 MAPK in cancer progression, we developed a potent and selective p38 MAPK inhibitor, LY22288220 dimesylate (hereafter LY2228820), and characterized its activity using in vitro biochemical and cellular systems and in vivo xenograft models in which tumor and/or TME p38 MAPK activity has been implicated. These results demonstrate that LY2228820, a novel p38 MAPK inhibitor, provides an opportunity for the treatment of cancer through modulation of aberrant interactions between the tumor and its supportive microenvironment, a therapeutic strategy that merits further clinical evaluation.

Materials and Methods

Crystallography

For crystallographic studies, human p38 was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by affinity and gel filtration chromatography. Purified protein was in a solution containing 150 mmol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L Hepes pH 7.5, 10 mmol/L methionine, 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, and 10% glycerol. Protein at 16.2 mg/mL was mixed in 1% βOG and 1.25 mmol/L LY2228820 before crystallization drops were set up. Diffraction-quality crystals of p38/LY2228820 were grown by the vapor diffusion technique at 21°C under the reservoir condition 0.1 M Na cacodylate, pH 6.2, 10% PEG 3350. Crystals belong to space group P212121 with unit cell parameters a = 66.558 Å, b = 74.456 Å, c = 78.691 Å. The diffraction data (resolution of 1.97 Å) were collected on beam line ID-31 (then SGX-CAT) at the advanced photon source (APS; Argonne National Laboratories). The crystal structure was determined by the method of molecular replacement and was refined using a maximum likelihood target as incorporated in the program CNX2000 first and then using Refmac5 (Rwork = 0.2303, Rfree = 0.2666).

Kinase assays

For p38-MAPK enzymatic assays (enzyme sourced from either Millipore or Roche), 33P-ATP radiometric filter binding (Millipore MAPH plates) was used with an EGFR peptide substrate, KRELVEPLTPSGEAPNQALLR (Multiple Peptide Systems), and 100 μmol/L (p38α) or 20 μmol/L (p38β, p38γ) ATP run under linear velocity conditions. LY2228820 was also tested against a panel of enzymatic kinase assays (internal assays and Merck Millipore KinaseProfiler; ref. 37; all human sequence) to assess the relative kinase selectivity in vitro. The initial screen was conducted at 20 μmol/L followed by 10-point concentration–response curves (1:3 serial dilutions from 20 μmol/L to 1 nmol/L). All assays were either 96-well radiometric filter binding (33P-ATP phospho-cellulose or glass fiber) or fluorescence polarization formats under linear velocity conditions, at or below the Km[ATP] (typically 30–120 minutes resulting in ≤10% ATP conversion) using 1% to 4% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) final (depending on enzyme tolerance for solvent). IC50 values were calculated using 4-parameter nonlinear regression (ActivityBase software, IDBS).

Cell lines

All human cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; A549, U-87MG, HeLa, MDA-MB-468, 786-O), DSMZ (OPM-2), or the NCI DCTD Tumor Repository (A2780) between 2004 and 2012 and pathogen tested (PCR): human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1, HIV-2), hepatitis viruses (A, B, C), human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV-1, HTLV-2), Epstein–Barr virus, hantaviruses (Hantaan, Seoul, Sin Nombre), herpes simplex virus-1, herpes simplex virus-2, human cytomegalovirus, human herpes virus-6, human herpes virus-8, human adenovirus, varicella virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, and Mycoplasma spp. These lines were authenticated by short tandem repeat (STR)-based DNA profiling and multiplex PCR (IDEXX RADIL CellCheck; IDEXX Laboratories). Rodent cell lines (B16-F10, RAW264.7) were purchased from ATCC (between 2000 and 2002) and pathogen tested (PCR) against Mycoplasma spp. and Mycoplasma pulmonis.

MK2 capture ELISA

RAW 264.7 cells were treated with compound (range of 20 μmol/L to 1 nmol/L, 10 1:3 serial dilutions) for 2 hours at 37°C/5% CO2. Anisomycin (10 μg/mL) was added into the media to activate the p38 pathway. After 30 minutes incubation, cells were fixed and p38 activity was assessed in an electrochemiluminescent capture ELISA (cELISA) using a phospho-MK2 (Thr 334; Cell Signaling Technologies) antibody. Briefly, 5 μL of a 20 μg/mL concentration of anti-MK2 antibody (Cat. No. KAP-MA015; Stressgen) was placed into a 96-well high-binding MesoScale Discovery (MSD) plate and incubated at 4°C overnight. The plate was blocked for 1 hour at room temperature (RT), washed, and 25 μL of detection antibody, anti-p-MK2 (Cat. No. 3041; Cell Signaling, Inc.) conjugated to ruthenium, was added and incubated for 2 hours at RT. The plate was washed, 150 μL of 1× ReadT buffer was added per well and the plate read on an MSD Sector 6000 instrument.

LPS/IFN-γ–stimulated TNF-α release by mouse peritoneal macrophages in vitro

Mouse peritoneal macrophages were activated in vivo by 3% thioglycollate injection (intraperitoneal, administered 4 days before harvest), then harvested and plated in 96-well microtiter plates. The cells were treated with LY2228820 (range of 20 μmol/L to 1 nmol/L, 10 1:3 serial dilutions) for 0.5 hours, and then incubated with LPS/IFN-γ for 2 hours (to stimulate p38-MAPK) and the media measured for TNF-α by ELISA (R&D Systems).

Cytokine analysis

A549 cells (3 × 104) were seeded into 24-well tissue culture dishes in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI, Buffalo, NY) media/10% FBS (Invitrogen). 24 hours later, cells were pretreated for 30 minutes with 0.01% DMSO or LY2228820 dimesylate (range of 20 μmol/L to 1 nmol/L, 10 1:3 serial dilutions) before the addition of 100 ng/mL LPS (Millipore). Conditioned media was collected 72 hours post-LPS treatment and total viable cells were counted by Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter). Samples were analyzed for CXCL8 secretion with Quantikine Colorimetric Sandwich ELISAs (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Anisomycin-stimulated HeLa cell kinase selectivity assay (Western blot analysis)

HeLa cells were pretreated with LY2228820 for 1 hour before stimulation with anisomycin (10 μg/mL) for 45 minutes. Cells were then lysed in a protein lysis buffer [containing protease (leupeptin 10 μg/ml, trypsin–chymotrypsin inhibitor 10 μg/ml, N-p-Tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone 10 μg/mL, aprotinin 10 μg/mL, Na-p-Tosyl-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride 2 mmol/L, benzamidine hydrochloride hydrate 5 mmol/L) and phosphatase inhibitors (sodium metavanadate anhydrous 1 mmol/L, p-nitrophenyl phosphate 15 mmol/L, microcystin 1 μmol/L), okadaic acid 1 μmol/L; Sigma-Aldrich] and proteins were analyzed by Western blotting for p38, JNK, and p44/42 (ERK1/2) pathway activities. All antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies: phospho-MK-2 (Thr334), phospho-p38 MAP kinase (Thr180/Tyr182), total p38a MAPK antibody, phospho-ATF2 (Thr71), phospho-JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), phospho-cJun (Ser63), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204), and phospho-cMyc (Thr58/ser62).

Phosphorylation of MK2 in mouse B16-F10 melanoma tumors

In vivo target inhibition.

Murine B16-F10 melanoma cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with l-glutamine, high glucose and 10% FBS (GIBCO 11965-092). C57/bl6 mice (Charles River) were implanted in the rear flank with B16-F10 cells (2 × 106), and when tumors reached approximately 200 mm3 in size, were dosed orally with LY2228820 in 1% carboxymethylcellulose/0.25% Tween 80. Two hours postdose, tumors were excised, homogenized, and lysed for Western blot analysis. MK2 phosphorylation (p-Thr334), normalized to total glyceraldehyde–3–phosphate dehydrogenase, was quantified by chemiluminescent detection. The 50% or 70% threshold effective dose (TED50 and TED70, respectively) was calculated (JMP software, SAS) to approximate effective dose ranges for testing of LY2228820 in xenograft models, that is, where significant target inhibition was observed. The TED50 or TED70 is defined as the dose where a statistically significant effect was achieved, and there was at least 50% or 70% inhibition, respectively, compared with vehicle control.

In vivo pharmacodynamics.

Mice bearing B16-F10 tumors were given a single dose of LY2228820 approximating the TED70 (10 mg/kg p.o.) and sampled for compound exposure and tumor phospho-MK2 (p-MK2) over various time points.

In vivo phosphorylation of MK2 in mouse and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

See Supplementary Methods (Supplementary Fig. S1).

shRNA knockdown of p38α MAPK in U-87MG glioma cells

See Supplementary Methods (Supplementary Fig. S2).

In vivo tumor models

All studies were done in accordance with AALAC-accredited institutional guidelines. Female immunocompromised mice received food and water ad libitum and were acclimated for at least 1 week before xenograft implantation. Cells used in xenograft studies were pathogen tested and authenticated by STR analysis. Banked master stocks were returned to within approximately 6 months, or if inconsistencies in growth behavior were observed. Cells originated from the ATCC unless otherwise indicated.

Subcutaneous cell-based inoculations were performed in a 1:1 volume (200 μL total) with Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and were injected in the right rear flank. Inoculums and host animals were as follows: 5 × 106 cells for U-87MG, SK-OV-3x-luc#1 (M. Harrington and S. Brutkiewicz, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN), 786-O, and 1 × 107 cells for A549 were implanted into athymic nude mice (Harlan); 2 × 106 for A-2780 (NCI DCTD) into CD1 nu/nu mice (Charles River); and 5 × 106 for OPM-2 (DSMZ GmBH) into CB-17 SCID mice (Taconic) irradiated with 2.5 Gy within 24 hours of implant. MDA-MB-468 breast cancer xenografts were initiated as implants of established cell-derived tumors in athymic nude mice at Oncotest GmBH. Tumors were allowed to establish for at least 1 week before randomization into treatment groups; treatments began with tumors of 50 to 250 mm3. LY2228820 was prepared in 1% CMC/0.25% Tween 80 or HEC 1%/Tween 80 0.25%/AF 0.05% and delivered by oral gavage (10 mL/kg, v/v). Comparable vehicle control groups were run in parallel. Dosages, dosing schedules, and cohort sizes are described in the legend for each study. Tumor size and body weight were recorded 1 to 2 times per week. Tumor size was determined by caliper and tumor volume (mm3) was estimated using the formula: l × w2 × 0.536, where l is the larger and w is the smaller of the perpendicular diameters. Tumor data were analyzed by repeated measures using ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test.

SK-OV-3 and 786-O orthotopic xenograft models

Female athymic nude mice (20–25 g; Harlan) received intraperitoneal injections (2 × 106 cells in 0.2 mL PBS) of SK-OV-3 luciferase-labeled tumor cells or luciferase-labeled 786-O cells (2 × 106 in 0.025 mL PBS) implanted into the renal capsule of the surgically accessed left kidney. On days 10 and 21 respectively, animals with a signal demonstrating tumor presence were randomized into study groups and started on drug treatments. Anesthetized animals were imaged weekly with an IVIS Spectrum (Caliper Life Sciences) following intraperitoneal injection 150 μL of 15 mg/mL of d-luciferin (Sigma-Aldrich). Data review and analysis were performed with the Living Image 3.0 program. Tumor growth was measured for each animal as luminescent light intensity or Total Flux (P/S) with fixed region of interest data from the IVIS Spectrum. Statistical comparisons used Dunnett's ANOVA and t test measures between the treatment groups.

Mouse B16-F10 melanoma lung metastasis model

B16-F10 melanoma cells (50,000) were injected into the tail vein of nude mice 1 day before treatment. Mice were orally dosed by gavage with vehicle or LY2228820 (either 10 or 30 mg/kg) 3 times a day, on a schedule of 4 days on/3 days off for 14 consecutive days (n = 10 animals/group). Lung tissues were collected and placed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin followed by 70% ethanol storage. Individual lung metastases were counted visually. Data were analyzed by ANOVA.

Results

Utilizing molecular modeling to guide medicinal chemistry efforts, a series of molecules were designed from early screening actives to optimize binding to the ATP pocket of p38α MAPK, reduce potential off-target kinase activity, achieve drug-like properties, and minimize the risk of drug–drug interactions. The candidate compound 2 was identified from iterative SAR on hits found in the Lilly compound collection, as represented by the generic structure 1 (Fig. 1A). Awareness of potential CYP activity associated with the imidazole central core led to the difluoroaryl substitution at C-2 with other sterically bulky groups such as tert-butyl as found in the candidate (38). The contribution of the 4-fluorophenyl group to enzymatic affinity can be understood by recognizing that it occupies a hydrophobic pocket of the ATP binding site near the gatekeeper Thr106, as seen in the x-ray co-crystal structure (Fig. 1B). In addition, modifications of the benzimidazole substituent at C-5 and the aromatic group, R2, at C-4 of the imidazole were made in consideration of improving cell-based potency as well as pharmacokinetic properties.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, depiction of SAR progression from initial actives (1) to candidate molecule, LY2228820 (2). The candidate compound 2 was identified from iterative SAR on hits found in the Lilly compound collection, as represented by the generic structure 1. Molecules were designed to optimize binding to the ATP pocket of p38α MAPK, reduce the potential of off-target cross-reactivity, and minimize CYP P450 activity. B, crystal structure of LY2228820 in the ATP-binding site of p38α MAPK. The amino aza-benzimidazole moiety in LY2228820 forms 2 hydrogen bonds with the hinge backbone. The fluoro-phenyl group projected from the center imidazole is buried in a hydrophobic pocket near the gate-keeper residue Thr106, which has close van der waals contact between its side chain and the phenyl ring. The fluoro group has Bürgi–Dunitz interaction with 2 backbone carbonyls and also has close interaction with the side chain of Leu104. Compared with the binding conformation of inhibitors like SB203580, LY2228820 has a more extended warhead group and hence shifted hinge position. Although the fluoro-phenyl group is similarly bound, the lower position of the P-loop in the LY2228820 structure creates a smaller cavity (closer distance) between the N-terminal lobe and the C-terminal lobe.

In vitro characterization data

One compound from the benzimidazole SAR, LY2228820 (Fig. 1), was found to be a very potent, ATP-competitive inhibitor of both the α and β isoforms of p38 MAPK in vitro (IC50 = 5.3 and 3.2 nmol/L, respectively) with >1,000-fold selectivity for p38α MAPK versus 178 other kinases tested (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Within the MAPK family, LY2228820 was >1,000-fold more selective for p38α versus p38δ, p38γ, ERK1, and ERK2; >50-fold more selective for p38α versus JNK1; 30-fold more selective for p38α versus JNK3; and 15-fold more selective for p38α versus JNK2. In mode of action experiments, LY2228820 was ATP competitive with a Ki[apparent] = 4.5 ± 0.5 nmol/L (radiometric filter binding assay) and with tight-binding kinetics (kd = 0.0025 ± 0.0005 s−1, ka = 1.22 × 106 ± 0.08 M−1s−1; by surface plasmon resonance; data not shown). LY2228820 was also tested in a wide array of assays to assess any off-target effects on nonkinase enzymes, ion channels, transporters, G-protein–coupled receptors, nuclear hormone receptors, and others; and importantly, no significant off-target effects were observed (Cerep Profiling Service; data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

In vitro kinase and cell-based activity of LY2228820

To confirm p38α MAPK–dependent biologic activity, LY2228820 was tested in a series of cell-based assays (Table 1 and Fig. 2). LY2228820 potently inhibited phosphorylation of the p38α MAPK substrate, MK2 (Thr334), in anisomycin-stimulated mouse RAW264.7 macrophages [IC50 = 35.3 ± 5.0 nmol/L (n = 4) by ELISA]. In cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells, phospho-Thr334-MK2 was inhibited by LY2228820 at 9.8 nmol/L and completely ablated by 156 nmol/L; no changes in phosphorylation of p38α MAPK, JNK, ERK1/2, c-Jun, ATF2, or cMyc were observed at concentrations up to 10 μmol/L (Fig. 2). LY2228820 was active in cell-based functional assays, blocking TNF-α secretion by LPS/IFN-γ–stimulated mouse peritoneal macrophages [IC50 = 6.3 ± 2.4 nmol/L (n = 4)] and LPS-induced CXCL8 secretion by non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; A549) cells in vitro [IC50 = 144.9 ± 51.8 nmol/L (n = 3)].

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effect of LY2228820 on phosphorylation of various MAP kinase substrates in HeLa cells in vitro. HeLa cells (ATCC) were pretreated with LY2228820 (10 μmol/L → 9.8 nmol/L, 1:2 serial dilutions) for 1 hour before stimulation with anisomycin (10 μg/mL) for 45 minutes. Cells were then lysed in a protein lysis buffer (containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors) and proteins were analyzed by Western blotting for p38, JNK, and p44/42 (ERK1/2) pathway activities. The first 2 lanes represent HeLa lysates with and without anisomycin treatment (in absence of p38 inhibitor) serve as controls.

LY2228820 was screened for cytotoxicity across >50 cancer cell lines using both standard monolayer and soft agar culture conditions. Despite evidence of p38 MAPK inhibition and consequent changes in cellular cytokines cited above, single agent antiproliferative effects were not observed across the cell lines and EC50 values were greater than 2 μmol/L in all cases (data not shown).

In vivo tumor target inhibition

LY2228820 was orally bioavailable in the mouse, with a T1/2 = 2.8 hours (single oral dose of 20 mg/kg). In mice implanted with B16-F10 melanoma, tumor phospho-MK2 was effectively inhibited by LY2228820 in a dose-dependent manner (TED50 = 1.95 mg/kg, TED70 = 11.17 mg/kg; Fig. 3A). Significant target inhibition (>40% inhibition of phospho-MK2) was maintained for approximately 4 to 8 hours following a single 10 mg/kg oral dose (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A, dose–response effect of LY2228820 on phosphorylation of MAPKAP-K2 (p-MK2) in mouse B16-F10 melanoma tumors. Murine B16-F10 melanoma cells were implanted in the rear flank of C57BL/6 mice; when tumors reached approximately 200 mm, animals were dosed orally with vehicle or LY2228820 (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg). Two hours postdose, tumors were excised, homogenized, and lysed for Western blot analysis. MK2 phosphorylation (p-Thr334) was quantified by chemiluminescent detection. Symbols represent % inhibition of p-MK2 in tumors of individual animals (n = 3 independent experiments). The 50% or 70% threshold effective doses (TED50 and TED70, respectively) ± SEM were calculated to approximate effective dose ranges for testing of LY2228820 in xenograft models. B, time–course effect of LY2228820 on phosphorylation of MK2 (phospho-MK2) in mouse B16-F10 melanoma tumors. Time–course response to a single 10 mg/kg p.o. dose of LY2228820 in the mouse B16-F10 tumor model (n = 6 per group); tumor p-MK2 (open circles) and plasma compound concentration (closed circles) were assessed at various time points over a 24-hour period.

In vivo pharmacodynamic biomarker

To understand whether peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) could be used as a potential surrogate biomarker for p38 MAPK inhibition, PBMCs were collected from mice dosed orally with LY2228820 or from patients with multiple myeloma (treated with LY2228820 ex vivo). With either mouse or human PBMC, LY2228820 inhibited MK2 phosphorylation: mouse in vivo TED50 = 1.01 mg/kg (compound exposure approximately 100 nmol/L) and human ex vivo IC50 = 0.12 μmol/L (Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B).

In vivo efficacy

Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, subsequent in vivo subcutaneous xenograft studies were conducted at doses that were predicted to yield >50% target inhibition (ranging from 10 to 30 mg/kg p.o., either twice a day or 3 times a day). LY2228820 up to 30 mg/kg 3 times a day was well tolerated in all studies and no significant weight loss (<10%) or animal death attributable to drug treatment was observed.

LY2228820-treated A549 NSCLC xenografts demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition under 2 different dosing schedules. LY2228820 (20 mg/kg 3 times a day) was administered for 34 days on a continuous daily schedule (days 4–38) or an intermittent schedule (3 day on, then 3 day off) starting on day 16. Both the continuous and intermittent treatment schedules resulted in significant tumor growth delay after 3 weeks of treatment compared with the vehicle control (P < 0.05, days 27–38). Tumor growth was not significantly different on the 2 LY2228820 treatment schedules. A number of other solid tumor xenograft models demonstrated highly significant tumor growth inhibition when LY2228820 was administered orally twice a day or 3 times a day in a range from 10 to 30 mg/kg. A complete attenuation of tumor growth occurred in the U-87MG glioma model during the treatment period (days 11–28, P < 0.001); the A-2780 ovarian, MDA-MB-468 breast and OPM-2 myeloma xenografts were inhibited 72% (P < 0.01), 60% (P < 0.001), and 42% (P < 0.05), respectively, on the last day of study treatment (Fig. 4). Importantly, shRNA knockdown of p38α MAPK led to significant U-87MG tumor growth delay, further substantiating a role for p38 MAPK in tumorigenesis (Supplementary Fig. S2). In addition, LY2228820 dosed intermittently at 10 and 30 mg/kg reduced the number of lung metastases in the B16-F10 syngeneic mouse melanoma model; metastases were significantly reduced by 57% at 30 mg/kg (P = 0.012; Fig. 4).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Effect of LY2228820 in solid tumor xenograft models in vivo. A549 NSCLC xenograft: nude mice were treated orally with vehicle (open symbols) or LY2228820 (closed symbols) at 20 mg/kg 3 times a day from days 4 to 13. Starting day 14, one LY2228820-treated group continued with the daily dosing regimen (Embedded Image “Daily”) whereas a second group switched to an intermittent 3 days on/3 days off drug treatment schedule (Embedded Image “Intermittent”). Comparable vehicle control groups (Embedded Image,Embedded Image) were run in parallel; n = 10 animals/group. A significant decrease in tumor volume occurred with both continuous and intermittent dosing strategies; efficacy of LY2228820 was not significantly different on the 2 schedules. A2780 ovarian xenograft: nude mice bearing xenografts began treatment 15 days after implantation. Vehicle (Embedded Image) or LY2228820 (Embedded Image) 10 mg/kg was given orally, 3 times a day, on a schedule of 4 days on/3 days off for 3 weeks; n = 10 animals per group. Significant tumor growth inhibition occurred throughout the treatment phase. U-87MG glioma xenograft model: nude mice were treated orally with vehicle (Embedded Image) or LY2228820 (Embedded Image) twice a day at 14.7 mg/kg continuously on days 11 to 28; n = 10 animals/group. Significant tumor growth inhibition was observed on days 21 to 35. OPM-2 myeloma xenograft: nude mice were treated orally with vehicle (Embedded Image) or LY2228820 (Embedded Image) twice a day at 30 mg/kg continuously; n = 10 and 9 animals/group for vehicle and LY2228820, respectively. Significant tumor growth inhibition was observed with LY2228820 after 10 days of treatment and throughout the remainder of the study. MDA-MB-468 xenograft: subcutaneous MDA-MB-468 breast cancer xenografts were implanted into nude mice. Vehicle (Embedded Image) or LY2228820 (Embedded Image) was administered orally, 30 mg/kg twice a day (n = 7 per group). LY2228820 treatment resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition. B16-F10 melanoma syngeneic mouse model: cells were injected into the tail vein of nude mice 1 day before compound treatment. Vehicle or LY2228820 was administered orally at 10 or 30 mg/kg on a 4 days on/3 days off schedule for 14 days (n = 10 animals per group). All animals were examined for lung metastases at the end of study. A significant reduction in lung mets was observed following treatment with 30 mg/kg LY2228820. Statistics: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 by ANOVA.

Several other cell-based and patient-derived subcutaneous xenograft models did not demonstrate tumor growth inhibition with LY2228820 treatment. The effect of LY2228820 was compared in two of these xenograft models with both flank and orthotopic implantation. Luciferase-expressing SK-OV-3 ovarian cell xenografts implanted into the peritoneal cavity were highly responsive to LY2228820, demonstrating not only 50% to 51% tumor growth inhibition with both 10 and 30 mg/kg 3 times a day intermittent dosing (measured by area under the curve for bioluminescence; P < 0.05; Fig. 5) but also lower total excised tumor weight and reduced ascites in a separate study with 10 mg/kg on a daily schedule. Subcutaneously implanted SK-OV-3 xenografts were unresponsive to LY2228820 on the same schedules (Fig. 5). Similarly, LY2228820-induced tumor growth inhibition was not observed in the subcutaneously implanted 786-O renal carcinoma xenograft employing a daily 30 mg/kg 3 times a day schedule (Fig. 5). However, luciferase-labeled 786-O cell xenografts orthotopically implanted into the renal capsule of the left kidney demonstrated a 44% decrease in luminescence after 3 weeks (P < 0.05), and 35% reduced average excised tumor weight (P < 0.05) when treated on the same schedule with the same dose (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Effect of LY2228820 in flank versus orthotopic tumor xenograft models. SK-OV-3 ovarian xenograft models: luciferase-expressing SK-OV-3 cells were implanted either subcutaneously in the flank or intraperitoneally as an orthotopic model. Both were treated orally with vehicle (Embedded Image) or LY2228820 at 30 mg/kg (Embedded Image) or 10 mg/kg (Embedded Image) 3 times a day on a 3 day on/3 day off schedule for 3 weeks. Subcutaneous xenografts did not demonstrate tumor growth inhibition with LY2228820; orthotopic xenografts demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition at both doses of LY2228820. 786-O renal carcinoma xenograft models: 786-O cells were implanted subcutaneously in the flank; luciferase-expressing 786-O were implanted into the renal capsule of the left kidney as an orthotopic model. Both were treated orally with vehicle (Embedded Image) or LY2228820 (Embedded Image) at 30 mg/kg 3 times a day on a continual schedule for 3 weeks. Subcutaneous 786-O xenografts did not demonstrate tumor growth inhibition with LY2228820; orthotopic 786-O xenografts treated with LY2228820 demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition on the final day of measurement. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.

Discussion

Following an extensive medicinal chemistry effort to identify potent, selective, and orally active inhibitors of p38 MAPK (38, 39), a series of trisubstituted imidazole derivatives were synthesized and tested. This effort resulted in the synthesis of LY2228820 and, for the first time, characterization of its crystal structure in complex with p38α MAPK. LY2228820 is a potent and selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of the α and β isoforms of p38 MAPK in vitro. In cell-based assays, LY2228820 potently and selectively inhibited p38α MAPK substrate phosphorylation (p-Thr334-MK2) with no effects on phosphorylation of p38α MAPK, JNK, ERK1/2, c-jun, ATF2, or cMyc. Consistent with established p38α MAPK signaling activity, LY2228820 also potently reduced LPS-stimulated cytokine secretion by both macrophages and A549 NSCLC cells.

LY2228820 did not demonstrate direct antiproliferative activity in the tumor cell lines tested in vitro despite clear repression of downstream signaling (Fig. 2 and data not shown) but did demonstrate antitumor activity in vivo. In tumor models, a tight pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship between compound exposure, MK2 phosphorylation, and in vivo antitumor activity was observed. The fact that tumor growth inhibition by LY2228820 was observed in some, but not all, xenograft models tested supports the concept that p38α MAPK activity is cell and/or context dependent. Responsive xenografts are derived from several different histologies, have a variety of commonly considered mutations such as p53, KRAS, PTEN, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, and APC, and have cytokine profiles that range from little to no cytokine secretion (e.g., A2780) to high expressors of cytokines such as IL-6, CXCL8, and VEGF (e.g., U-87MG and 786-O). Yet both responsive and unresponsive subcutaneous xenograft tumors demonstrate p38 MAPK inhibition with LY2228820 treatment, as evidenced by reduced MK2 and HSP27 phosphorylation (data not shown).

Further support for the cell/context-dependent influence of p38 MAPK on cancer development and tumor growth is the observation that unresponsive tumors in the subcutaneous environment are responsive in the orthotopic environment. These findings are most readily understood if the p38 MAPK mechanism of action is primarily derived through tumor interaction with the TME. Recent data describing a role for p38 MAPK in angiogenesis support this tumor–TME interaction. Using both an in vitro measure of cord formation as well as an in vivo vascular development model, Tate and colleagues demonstrate that p38 MAPK inhibition by LY2228820 reduces angiogenesis both at the level of the stroma and at the level of the tumor cell itself (6). The effects of LY2228820 on VEGF, cytokine levels, and angiogenesis in vitro were phenocopied by p38α MAPK shRNA, but not p38β MAPK shRNA, confirming the p38α MAPK dependency (6). Similarly in this study, LY2228820-induced tumor growth delay in U-87MG tumor xenografts in vivo was phenocopied by p38α MAPK knockdown (Supplementary Fig. S2).

In addition to the preclinical data, there is compelling clinical evidence suggesting p38 MAPK activity contributes to, or drives, several cancers by modulating the release of soluble, tumor supportive factors. Among its many activities, p38α MAPK stabilizes the message of various cytokines including TNF-α and CXCL8 and is required for IL-1 induction of IL-6 (2). Higher serum and alveolar lavage IL-6 and CXCL8 levels are associated with survival of patient with shorter lung cancer (40). In addition, p38α MAPK is highly activated in NSCLC relative to normal lung tissue (41). CXCL8 is also higher in the serum and cystic fluid from patients with ovarian cancer as compared with healthy patients or those with benign cysts (14) and increased CXCL8 expression correlated with more advanced stages of disease. In breast cancer, high levels of activated p38 MAPK have been correlated with invasive disease, tamoxifen resistance, and poor survival (42–45). Given these clinical observations, and the cumulative in vitro and in vivo preclinical data, it is possible that therapeutic inhibition of p38 MAPK could be effective clinically in reducing tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis.

In summary, LY2228820 is a potent and selective inhibitor of p38 MAPK with antitumor activity. Further studies are ongoing to determine the potential of this compound in other tumor types and in combination with standard-of-care agents to determine, for example, whether p38 MAPK may be involved in drug resistance to traditional cytotoxic therapy (44, 45, 46). Although there are a multitude of data linking p38 MAPK to tumor growth and metastasis via microenvironment interactions, it is still unclear how these effects manifest themselves across tumor types. The differences observed in response to LY228820 in vivo suggest there is likely more than one mechanism by which p38 MAPK drives tumor growth. The preclinical activity profile, drug-like properties, and pharmacodynamic effect on p-MK2, provide a compelling rationale to explore the clinical utility of this molecule in human cancer (47).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

E.M. Chan has ownership interest (including patents) in Eli Lilly and Company. J.R. Graff has ownership interest (including patents) in Eli Lilly and Company. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: R.M. Campbell, E.M. Chan, A. De Dios, R. Gilmour, M. Mader, S. Parsons, C. Shih, L.F. Stancato, J.J. Starling, J.A. Velasco, X. Ye

Development of methodology: R.M. Campbell, B.D. Anderson, N.A. Brooks, E.M. Chan, J. Graff, S. Na, S. Parsons, J.A. Velasco, Y. Wang, X. Ye

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): B.D. Anderson, N.A. Brooks, H.B. Brooks, R. Gilmour, J. Graff, D. McCann, S. Na, S. Pratt, L.F. Stancato, J.J. Starling, C. Tate, Y. Wang, X. Ye

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): R.M. Campbell, B.D. Anderson, N.A. Brooks, H.B. Brooks, E.M. Chan, J. Graff, D. McCann, S. Na, S. Pratt, L.F. Stancato, C. Tate, Y. Wang, X. Ye

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: R.M. Campbell, B.D. Anderson, H.B. Brooks, E.M. Chan, A. De Dios, R. Gilmour, J. Graff, S. Na, S. Pratt, C. Shih, L.F. Stancato, J.J. Starling, Y. Wang, X. Ye

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): R.M. Campbell, N.A. Brooks, E. Jambrina, M. Mader, C. Shih

Study supervision: R.M. Campbell, N.A. Brooks, R. Gilmour, J. Graff, D. McCann, J.J. Starling, X. Ye

Grant Support

All research described herein was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank L. Fan, L. Green, S. Hatch, L. Huber, B. Neubauer, N. Roehm, S. Watkins, and J. Wolos for their excellent technical and/or managerial support.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received July 19, 2013.
  • Revision received October 15, 2013.
  • Accepted December 11, 2013.
  • ©2013 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Manning G,
    2. Whyte DB,
    3. Martinez R,
    4. Hunter T,
    5. Sudarsanam S
    . The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002;298:1912–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Schultz RM
    . Potential of p38 MAP kinase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Prog Drug Res 2003;60:59–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brancho D,
    2. Tanaka N,
    3. Jaeschke A,
    4. Ventura JJ,
    5. Kelkar N,
    6. Tanaka Y,
    7. et al.
    Mechanism of p38 MAP kinase activation in vivo . Genes Dev 2003;17:1969–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sandler H,
    2. Stoecklin G
    . Control of mRNA decay by phosphorylation of tristetraprolin. Biochem Soc Trans 2008;36:491–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wagner EF,
    2. Nebreda AR
    . Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:537–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tate C,
    2. Blosser W,
    3. Wyss L,
    4. Evans G,
    5. Xue Q,
    6. Pan Y,
    7. et al.
    LY2228820 dimesylate, a selective inhibitor of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, reduces angiogenic endothelial cord formation in vitro and in vivo . J Biol Chem 2013;288:6743–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schieven GL
    . The biology of p38 kinase: a central role in inflammation. Curr Top Med Chem 2005;5:921–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Coulthard LR,
    2. White DE,
    3. Jones DL,
    4. McDermott MF,
    5. Burchill SA
    . p38(MAPK): stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Trends Mol Med 2009;15:369–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. del Barco Barrantes I,
    2. Nebreda AR
    . Roles of p38 MAPKs in invasion and metastasis. Biochem Soc Trans 2012;40:79–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Benedetti V,
    2. Perego P,
    3. Luca Beretta G,
    4. Corna E,
    5. Tinelli S,
    6. Righetti SC,
    7. et al.
    Modulation of survival pathways in ovarian carcinoma cell lines resistant to platinum compounds. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:679–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pollard JW
    . Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:71–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mantovani A,
    2. Allavena P,
    3. Sica A,
    4. Balkwill F
    . Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454:436–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Campbell RM,
    2. Xin X,
    3. Xia X,
    4. Ye X,
    5. Lee P,
    6. Schultz RM,
    7. et al.
    Effect of a selective p38-MAPK inhibitor (LY479754) on the tumor microenvironment: implication of macrophage-derived p38-MAPK in the growth of murine P815 mastocytoma tumors. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2005;46 (suppl, abstr 2609).
  14. 14.↵
    1. Moscova M,
    2. Marsh DJ,
    3. Baxter RC
    . Protein chip discovery of secreted proteins regulated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 2006;66:1376–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nicolini A,
    2. Carpi A,
    3. Rossi G
    . Cytokines in breast cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2006;17:325–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Okamoto M,
    2. Liu W,
    3. Luo Y,
    4. Tanaka A,
    5. Cai X,
    6. Norris DA,
    7. et al.
    Constitutively active inflammasome in human melanoma cells mediating autoinflammation via caspase-1 processing and secretion of interleukin-1β. J Biol Chem 2010;285:6477–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Peng HH,
    2. Liang S,
    3. Henderson AJ,
    4. Dong C
    . Regulation of interleukin-8 expression in melanoma-stimulated neutrophil inflammatory response. Exp Cell Res 2007;313:551–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dong C,
    2. Slattery MJ,
    3. Liang S,
    4. Peng HH
    . Melanoma cell extravasation under flow conditions is modulated by leukocytes and endogenously produced interleukin 8. Mol Cell Biomech 2005;2:145–59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fimmel S,
    2. Devermann L,
    3. Herrmann A,
    4. Zouboulis C
    . GRO-α: a potential marker for cancer and aging silenced by RNA interference. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1119:176–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. von Felbert V,
    2. Cordoba F,
    3. Weissenberger J,
    4. Vallan C,
    5. Kato M,
    6. Nakashima I,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-6 gene ablation in a transgenic mouse model of malignant skin melanoma. Am J Pathol 2005;166:831–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kulbe H,
    2. Thompson R,
    3. Wilson JL,
    4. Robinson S,
    5. Hagemann T,
    6. Fatah R,
    7. et al.
    The inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α generates an autocrine tumor-promoting network in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res 2007;67:585–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Suswam E,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Gillespie GY,
    5. Li X,
    6. Shacka JJ,
    7. et al.
    Tristetraprolin down-regulates interleukin-8 and vascular endothelial growth factor in malignant glioma cells. Cancer Res 2008;68:674–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Yasui H,
    2. Hideshima T,
    3. Ikeda H,
    4. Jin J,
    5. Ocio EM,
    6. Kiziltepe T,
    7. et al.
    BIRB 796 enhances cytotoxicity triggered by bortezomib, heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 inhibitor, and dexamethasone via inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/Hsp27 pathway in multiple myeloma cell lines and inhibits paracrine tumour growth. Br J Haematol 2007;136:414–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ishitsuka K,
    2. Hideshima T,
    3. Neri P,
    4. Vallet S,
    5. Shiraishi N,
    6. Okawa Y,
    7. et al.
    p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor LY2228820 enhances bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity and inhibits osteoclastogenesis in multiple myeloma; therapeutic implications. Br J Haematol 2008;141:598–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hideshima T,
    2. Podar K,
    3. Chauhan D,
    4. Ishitsuka K,
    5. Mitsiades C,
    6. Tai YT,
    7. et al.
    p38 MAPK inhibition enhances PS-341 (bortezomib)-induced cytotoxicity against multiple myeloma cells. Oncogene 2004;23:8766–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hideshima T,
    2. Akiyama M,
    3. Hayashi T,
    4. Richardson P,
    5. Schlossman R,
    6. Chauhan D,
    7. et al.
    Targeting p38 MAPK inhibits multiple myeloma cell growth in the bone marrow milieu. Blood 2003;101:703–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. He J,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Zheng Y,
    4. Qian J,
    5. Li H,
    6. Lu Y,
    7. et al.
    p38 MAPK in myeloma cells regulates osteoclast and osteoblast activity and induces bone destruction. Cancer Res 2012;72:6393–402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gaundar SS,
    2. Bradstock KF,
    3. Bendall LJ
    . p38MAPK inhibitors attenuate cytokine production by bone marrow stromal cells and reduce stroma-mediated proliferation of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Cell Cycle 2009;8:2975–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zhu YM,
    2. Webster SJ,
    3. Flower D,
    4. Woll PJ
    . Interleukin-8/CXCL8 is a growth factor for human lung cancer cells. Br J Cancer 2004;91:1970–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Luppi F,
    2. Longo AM,
    3. de Boer WI,
    4. Rabe KF,
    5. Hiemstra PS
    . Interleukin-8 stimulates cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer through epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation. Lung Cancer 2007;56:25–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Yuan A,
    2. Chen JJ,
    3. Yao PL,
    4. Yang PC
    . The role of interleukin-8 in cancer cells and microenvironment interaction. Front Biosci 2005;10:853–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kuwahara I,
    2. Lillehoj EP,
    3. Lu W,
    4. Singh IS,
    5. Isohama Y,
    6. Miyata T,
    7. et al.
    Neutrophil elastase induces IL-8 gene transcription and protein release through p38/NF-κB activation via EGFR transactivation in a lung epithelial cell line. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2006;291:L407–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Walter M,
    2. Liang S,
    3. Ghosh S,
    4. Hornsby PJ,
    5. Li R
    . Interleukin 6 secreted from adipose stromal cells promotes migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2009;28:2745–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Neininger A,
    2. Kontoyiannis D,
    3. Kotlyarov A,
    4. Winzen R,
    5. Eckert R,
    6. Volk HD,
    7. et al.
    MK2 targets AU-rich elements and regulates biosynthesis of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 independently at different post-transcriptional levels. J Biol Chem 2002;277:3065–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Zhao F,
    2. Falk C,
    3. Osen W,
    4. Kato M,
    5. Schadendorf D,
    6. Umansky V
    . Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase drives dendritic cells to become tolerogenic in ret transgenic mice spontaneously developing melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:4382–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Yang J,
    3. Qian J,
    4. Wezeman M,
    5. Kwak LW,
    6. Yi Q
    . Tumor evasion of the immune system: inhibiting p38 MAPK signaling restores the function of dendritic cells in multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;107:2432–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Merck Millipore KinaseProfiler™ Service Assay Protocols v62. Available from: http://www.millipore.com/techpublications/tech1/pf3036 [Accessed Dec. 30, 2013].
  38. 38.↵
    1. de Dios A,
    2. Shih C,
    3. Lopez de Uralde B,
    4. Sanchez C,
    5. del Prado M,
    6. Martin Cabrejas LM,
    7. et al.
    Design of potent and selective 2-aminobenzimidazole-based p38α MAP kinase inhibitors with excellent in vivo efficacy. J Med Chem 2005;48:2270–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Mader M,
    2. de Dios A,
    3. Shih C,
    4. Bonjouklian R,
    5. Li T,
    6. White W,
    7. et al.
    Imidazolyl benzimidazoles and imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines as potent p38α MAP kinase inhibitors with excellent in vivo antiinflammatory properties. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2008;18:179–83.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Crohns M,
    2. Saarelainen S,
    3. Laine S,
    4. Poussa T,
    5. Alho H,
    6. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P
    . Cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum of lung cancer patients during radiotherapy - Association of interleukin-8 and VEGF with survival. Cytokine 2010;50:30–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Greenberg AK,
    2. Basu S,
    3. Hu J,
    4. Yie TA,
    5. Tchou-Wong KM,
    6. Rom WN,
    7. et al.
    Selective p38 activation in human non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:558–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Esteva FJ,
    2. Sahin AA,
    3. Smith TL,
    4. Yang Y,
    5. Pusztai L,
    6. Nahta R,
    7. et al.
    Prognostic significance of phosphorylated P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and HER-2 expression in lymph node-positive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:499–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Esteva FJ,
    2. Hortobagyi GN,
    3. Sahin AA,
    4. Smith TL,
    5. Chin DM,
    6. Liang SY,
    7. et al.
    Expression of erbB/HER receptors, heregulin and P38 in primary breast cancer using quantitative immunohistochemistry. Pathol Oncol Res 2001;7:171–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Gutierrez MC,
    2. Detre S,
    3. Johnston S,
    4. Mohsin SK,
    5. Shou J,
    6. Allred DC,
    7. et al.
    Molecular changes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: relationship between estrogen receptor, HER-2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2469–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Aesoy R,
    2. Sanchez BC,
    3. Norum JH,
    4. Lewensohn R,
    5. Viktorsson K,
    6. Linderholm B
    . An autocrine VEGF/VEGFR2 and p38 signaling loop confers resistance to 4-hydroxytamoxifen in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2008;6:1630–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Shi YY,
    2. Small GW,
    3. Orlowski RZ
    . Proteasome inhibitors induce a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent anti-apoptotic program involving MAPK phosphatase-1 and Akt in models of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;100:33–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Goetz MP,
    2. Tolcher AW,
    3. Haluska P,
    4. Papadopoulos KP,
    5. Erlichman C,
    6. Beeram M,
    7. et al.
    A first-in-human phase I study of the oral p38 MAPK inhibitor LY2228820 dimesylate in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30 (suppl):abstract 3001.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 13 (2)
February 2014
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of LY2228820 Dimesylate, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of p38 MAPK with Antitumor Activity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Characterization of LY2228820 Dimesylate, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of p38 MAPK with Antitumor Activity
Robert M. Campbell, Bryan D. Anderson, Nathan A. Brooks, Harold B. Brooks, Edward M. Chan, Alfonso De Dios, Raymond Gilmour, Jeremy R. Graff, Enrique Jambrina, Mary Mader, Denis McCann, Songqing Na, Stephen H. Parsons, Susan E. Pratt, Chuan Shih, Louis F. Stancato, James J. Starling, Courtney Tate, Juan A. Velasco, Yong Wang and Xiang S. Ye
Mol Cancer Ther February 1 2014 (13) (2) 364-374; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0513

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Characterization of LY2228820 Dimesylate, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of p38 MAPK with Antitumor Activity
Robert M. Campbell, Bryan D. Anderson, Nathan A. Brooks, Harold B. Brooks, Edward M. Chan, Alfonso De Dios, Raymond Gilmour, Jeremy R. Graff, Enrique Jambrina, Mary Mader, Denis McCann, Songqing Na, Stephen H. Parsons, Susan E. Pratt, Chuan Shih, Louis F. Stancato, James J. Starling, Courtney Tate, Juan A. Velasco, Yong Wang and Xiang S. Ye
Mol Cancer Ther February 1 2014 (13) (2) 364-374; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0513
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antineoplastic Effects of a Novel CDK2/9 Inhibitor CYC065
  • MTX-23, a Novel PROTAC That Degrades AR-V7 and AR-FL
  • Glutaminase Inhibition Improves Efficacy of Immunotherapies
Show more Small Molecule Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement