Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Therapeutic Discovery

Killing of Kras-Mutant Colon Cancer Cells via Rac-Independent Actin Remodeling by the βGBP Cytokine, a Physiological PI3K Inhibitor Therapeutically Effective In Vivo

Livio Mallucci, Dong-yun Shi, Derek Davies, Peter Jordan, Alastair Nicol, Lavinia Lotti, Renato Mariani-Costantini, Fabio Verginelli, Valerie Wells and Daniel Zicha
Livio Mallucci
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dong-yun Shi
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek Davies
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Jordan
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alastair Nicol
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lavinia Lotti
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renato Mariani-Costantini
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Verginelli
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valerie Wells
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Zicha
Authors' Affiliations:1School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London; 2Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; 3NYU in London, London, United Kingdom;4Department of Experimental Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome; and 5Unit of General Pathology, Aging Research Center, G. D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-1041-T Published September 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Activating mutations in Kras are the most frequent mutations in human cancer. They define a subset of patients who do not respond to current therapies and for whom prognosis is poor. Oncogenic Kras has been shown to deregulate numerous signaling pathways of which the most intensively studied are the Ras/extracellular signal–regulated kinase cascade and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt cascade. However, to date, there are no effective targeted therapies in the clinic against Kras-mutant cancers. Here, we report that the β-galactoside–binding protein (βGBP) cytokine, a physiologic inhibitor of class I PI3Ks, is a potent activator of apoptosis in Kras-mutant colorectal cancer cells, even when coharboring mutant-activated PIK3CA. Our study unveils an elective route to intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, which involves the cytoskeleton. Early events are inhibition of PI3K activity and Rac-independent actin rearrangement assignable to phosphoinositide changes at the plasma membrane. Cyclin E deregulation, arrest of DNA synthesis, and checkpoint kinase 2 activation underscore events critical to the activation of an intrinsic apoptotic program. Clustering of CD95/Fas death receptors underscore events critical to the activation of extrinsic apoptosis. In nude mice, we present the first evidence that xenograft tumor development is strongly inhibited by Hu-r-βGBP. Taken together, our results open a new therapeutic opportunity to a subset of patients refractive to current treatments. This first demonstration of therapeutic efficacy against Kras-mutant colon cancer suggests that Hu-r-βGBP may also be therapeutically effective against other cancers harboring activating Ras mutations as well as PIK3CA mutations. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(9); 1884–93. ©2012 AACR.

Introduction

Activating mutations in the Ras genes (H,K,N; ref. 1), the most common oncogenic mutations in human cancers, are dominant determinants of drug resistance. Most frequent in Kras, Kras mutations define tumors refractory to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy (2, 3) and to more recently introduced therapies based on EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (4–7). Locked in the GTP-bound mode, oncogenic Ras constitutively activates the Raf/MEK/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) cascade and an integrated signaling network, which controls cell proliferation and cell survival (8, 9) to be a major mediator of tumorigenesis.

The importance of activating mutations in the Ras oncogenes in human cancers has made Ras and downstream effectors elective targets for therapeutic intervention, but the value of targeting inhibitors in the clinic remains doubtful. For example, prevention of Ras anchorage at the cell membrane by farnesyltransferase inhibitors has been shown to be effective in mice expressing oncogenic Ras but not in patients with solid tumors (10). Similarly, in more recent studies, CI-1040, a MEK inhibitor, was found to induce significant shrinkage of Kras-driven lung carcinomas in mice (11), but had no significant effect in patients with advanced lung, breast, colon, and pancreatic cancers (12). Using a different approach, a number of compounds with efficacy against cells with mutant-activated Kras have been identified by high-throughput screening (13–16) and shown to inhibit xenograft growth (13, 15, 16); however, the mechanisms by which these compounds operate are not fully understood and their anticancer efficacy in the clinic remains uncertain.

Recently, the necessary role played by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway in maintaining tumor growth has made this pathway a target for small molecule inhibitors of the PI3K cascade (17–21). However, the efficacy of these inhibitors as single agents in Kras-driven oncogenesis is disputable. For example, in mice that had developed lung tumors in response to Kras activation, no significant tumor regression was found upon treatment with a dual pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, which had instead shown efficacy in lung tumors driven by the expression of activated PI3K (22). In other experiments, the efficacy of the PI3K inhibitor PX-866 was significantly less in xenografts bearing Kras and PIK3CA mutations than in those having PIK3CA mutations alone (23). On the other hand, Kras-mutant lung tumors did regress when the pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor was used in combination with an MEK inhibitor (22). Similarly, in cells expressing Kras or Hras mutants, resistance to PI3K inhibitors could be reversed by inhibitors of the Ras/ERK pathway (24). Despite these positive results, it remains to be established whether in the human system Kras oncogenicity could be overcome by the combined targeting of the PI3K and the Ras pathways and be beneficial as, in addition to toxicity, a disadvantage of this approach is that these pathways are also required for the proliferation of normal cells and for the maintenance of their homeostatic balance.

In previous studies, we have shown that monomeric β-galactoside–binding protein (βGBP), an antiproliferative cytokine (25) that in normal cells participates in the negative regulation of the cell cycle (26), operates through mechanisms that involve high-affinity receptor binding (Kd ∼ 1.5 × 10−10 mol/L; ref. 26) and molecular interactions leading to downregulation of class IA and class IB PI3Ks (27). Inhibition of PI3K activity by Hu-r-βGBP was found to have two major outcomes: suppression of Ras-GTP loading, leading to a block of ERK activation (27) and negation of Akt gene expression leading to loss of Akt (21), conditions that either by blocking the ability of cancer cells to proliferate or by impairing their ability to survive can block oncogenicity, thus highlighting a selective anticancer effect as in normal cells, βGBP-enforced cell cycle restriction is reversible (26).

We now report that in colorectal carcinoma cells bearing oncogenic Kras downregulation of PI3K activity by Hu-r-βGBP at doses that did not inhibit canonical signaling downstream of Ras or PI3K promoted events critical to the activation of an intrinsic and an extrinsic cell death program initiating with Rac-independent actin reorganization assignable to phosphoinositide changes at the plasma membrane. We also report that Hu-r-βGBP had therapeutic efficacy in vivo and that the added presence of activating mutations in PIK3CA did not confer resistance to treatment with Hu-r-βGBP.

Materials and Methods

Cells

SW480, SW620, and LoVo cells were acquired from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured in Leibovitz's L-15 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. HCT116wt, HCT116mut, DLD1wt, and DLD1mut cells, a gift from Bert Vogelstein (John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD), were cultured as originally reported (28). All cell lines were authenticated. Cell population distribution was assessed by propidium iodide staining and fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis as reported previously (26). Epithelial cells of the normal colon mucosa from surgical interventions were obtained with informed consent and the study was approved by the Medical School's Ethics Committee.

Recombinant βGBP

Hu-r-βGBP was expressed in Escherischia coli BL21(DE3) using hGal-1 cDNA in PET21a, purified by lactose–agarose (Sigma) affinity chromatography and purity assessed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF).

Apoptosis assays

Tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) staining, Annexin V (Pharmingen) staining, and caspase-3 activity (OncoImmunin) were assessed according to manufacturers' instructions and analyzed using an LSRII (Becton Dickinson).

PI3K assay

Step-by-step description of the method for assessment of PI3K activity has been reported previously (21). In brief, the immmunoprecipitated class I enzyme complex (27) was incubated in a kinase reaction for 3 hours with 40 pmol phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-biphosphate (PIP2) substrate and the phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)–triphosphate (PIP3) generated assayed in a competitive ELISA (Echelon Biosciences). Differences were tested using Student t test and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Western blotting

ERK2 phosphorylation was visualized by mobility shift using anti-p42 polyclonal anitibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Phosphorylated Akt was detected by antiphospho-Akt (Ser473) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and total Akt1/2 protein probed with anti-Akt1/2 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). E2F1 was detected using anti-E2F1 polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and phosphorylated checkpoint kinase (Chk)2 detected with antiphospho-Chk2 (Thr 68) polyclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). Secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (GE Healthcare) were used for visualization by enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare). Blots were reprobed with anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or with monoclonal anti-β-actin (Sigma). Active Rac1 levels were assessed by affinity precipitation using PAK1 p21 binding domain agarose (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by immunoblot analysis using anti-Rac1 monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling) and Odyssey fluorescent secondary antibodies. Total Rac was assessed using the same antibodies.

Fluorimetric quantitation of cyclin E

Cells fixed in cold 70% ethanol were treated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled monoclonal anti-cyclin E antibody (Becton Dickinson), washed, stained with propidium iodide containing RNase (Sigma), and analyzed using an LSRII (Becton Dickinson). FITC fluorescence was collected using a 530/30 filter and propidium iodide fluorescence using a 610/20 filter. At least 20,000 events were recorded.

DNA synthesis

Cells incubated with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma) for 30 minutes were fixed in cold 70% ethanol and stained for BrdUrd uptake using a monoclonal anti-BrdU antibody (Becton Dickinson), followed by an FITC-labeled monoclonal goat anti-mouse antibody (Dako). DNA was counterstained with propidium iodide (Sigma) containing RNase (Sigma). Samples were analyzed using an LSRII (Becton Dickinson) and FITC fluorescence collected using a 530/30 filter and propidium iodide fluorescence using a 610/20 filter. At least 20,000 events were recorded.

Microscopy

Cells on coverslips fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde/0.2% gluteraldehyde solution were stained with Texas Red phalloidin (Molecular Probes) for F-actin detection. For tubulin detection, cells were treated with a monoclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody (Sigma) followed by anti—mouse secondary antibody labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes). DNA was stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma). Imaging was carried out using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal system. Analysis of the F-actin–labeled regions was conducted in an automated manner using journals in MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging) and statistical significance tested by ANOVA (29). For CD95/Fas and FasL imaging with a Zeiss Axiophot microcope, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, incubated with a monoclonal antibody to CD95/Fas (Abcam) followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; Cappel) and rabbit polyclonal FasL antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), followed by Texas red–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories). Time-lapse imaging by differential interference contrast microscopy was used to monitor peripheral dynamics at the plasma membrane edge. Recordings on sets of 150 cells from 3 randomly selected fields from double experiments were analyzed and graded on a 0 to 3 arbitrary scale by 2 independent observers and statistical significance determined by χ2 test.

Tumor growth in mice

Thymectomized female nude CD-1mice (Charles River Laboratory) were implanted subcutaneously in the right flank with 5 × 106 SW620 cells in 150 μL PBS. Control mice received an equal volume of PBS. Mice were ear marked and randomized in groups of 7 and treatment with Hu-r-βGBP dissolved in PBS started at a tumor volume of approximately 40 mm3. Treatment was carried out by s.c. injection of 150 μL in the tumor area for 6 consecutive days with 1 day interval, up to 35 days. Control mice received an equal volume of PBS. Experiments were carried out in accordance with the U.K. Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research guidelines and approved by the local responsible authorities.

Results

Arrest of cell replication and apoptosis is preceded by cytoskeletal rearrangement

We tested Hu-r-βGBP against SW480 and SW620 colorectal cancer cells, of primary and metastatic derivation, both harboring KrasG12V, and against LoVo cells, also of metastatic origin, which harbor KrasG13D (COSMIC database). We found that treatment with Hu-r-βGBP at concentrations of 2–4 nmol/L, some 10-fold lower than those required for other cancer cells (21, 30), resulted in growth arrest and accumulation of cells in S-phase, a state reversible in normal cells (26) but followed in the cells of this study by total cell loss attributable to the activation of an apoptotic program documented by changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, functional alteration of the plasma membrane, and caspase-3 activation (Fig. 1A and B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Treatment with Hu-r-βGBP inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. A, rate of cell proliferation as related to dose response. Values are means of triplicate cultures ± SEM. Insets show cell-cycle phase distribution at day 3 of treatment with 4 nmol/L Hu-r-βGBP. Hu-r-βGBP was added 6 hours after seeding. B, apoptotic events at day 3 of treatment. Top to bottom, mitochondrial membrane potential assessed by tetramethylrhodamine ester (TMRE) staining; phosphatidylserine orientation at the plasma membrane assessed by Annexin V staining; caspase-3 activity assessed using PhiPhiLux. Inset values are percentages of cells committed to apoptosis (encircled area). Hu-r-βGBP 4 nmol/L added 6 hours after seeding. Data are from parallel representative experiments.

We next investigated whether as in other cell contexts (21, 27) PI3K was a responder to the action of Hu-r-βGBP. As cell phosphoinositide levels do not directly represent the functional state of the PI3K enzymes, but are the result of PI3K and PTEN activity, to estimate PI3K activity we isolated the PI3K enzyme complex (27) by immunoprecipitation and assessed its ability to convert PIP2 into PIP3 in a kinase reaction by measuring the generated PIP3 in a competitive ELISA (21). PIP3 quantitation (Fig. 2A) shows that downregulation of PI3K activity was a prime event, although delayed in the LoVo cells. However, contrary to previous evidence from other cell types (21, 27), we found no indication, after PI3K inhibition, of loss of ERK or Akt function in which phosphorylation state in the cells programmed to death was instead increased (Fig. 2B), a response conceivably similar to that seen in human cancer cells in which inhibition of mTORC1 by a rapamycin derivative resulted in increase ERK and Akt activity via a feedback loop (31). We discovered instead that the treated cells had undergone a profound change of shape characterized by F-actin rearrangement, spreading of the microtubular network, and an enlargement of the cell spread area in which changes in time were quantitated in terms of F-actin spatial distribution (Fig. 2C and Table 1), changes that can block cancer cell motility and invasion (32) but in our case followed by apoptosis (Fig. 1B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Quantitation of cell spread area as defined by F-actin staining

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Inhibition of PI3K activity is followed by changes of cell morphology brought about by cytoskeletal rearrangement. A, assessment of PI3K activity; measurements of PIP3 expressed as percentages of controls. Hu-r-βGBP 4 nmol/L was added 6 hours after seeding. Values are means of triplicate measurements ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 versus controls. B, Western blotting. Top, ERK2 mobility shift; upper band represents phosphorylated protein. Bottom, phosphorylated (Ser473) Akt and total Akt protein. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is shown as loading control. Hu-r-βGBP 4 nmol/L was added 6 hours after seeding. Data are from a representative experiment. C, example of micrographs of control and treated cells. Gray images show cell morphology acquired using differential interference contrast microscopy. Blue images represent nuclei labeled with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; red images represent F-actin distribution; green images represent microtubules. Images acquired by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Hu-r-βGBP 4 nmol/L was added 6 hours after seeding. SW480 cells fixed at hour 24 of treatment, SW620 and LoVo cells fixed at hour 48. Scale bars, 10 μm.

To investigate whether actin remodeling related to changes in Rac activity, a key regulator of actin dynamics, we assessed active Rac1 levels by immunoblot analysis and examined protrusive activity at the membrane edge, a Rac-mediated process (33), by time-lapse imaging within the 24 hours time span, leading to cytoskeletal changes. We found that in the cells in which PI3K activity had been inhibited, Rac1 levels remained unchanged and edge membrane activity was not affected by treatment with Hu-r-βGBP or by treatment with wortmannin (10 μM), a pharmacologic p110 inhibitor. These results, consistent with the finding that edge ruffling induced by constitutively active Rac is not blocked upon PI3K inhibition (34), suggest that in cells harboring oncogenic Ras, Rac activation is maintained through Ras-mediated signaling in a PI3K independent manner (35).

Cyclin E stabilization and arrest of DNA synthesis result in Chk2 activation

To determine which biochemical events consequent to PI3K inhibition and cytoskeletal changes may play a part in cell-cycle arrest and in the activation of an apoptotic program, we examined parameters involved in cell growth restriction.

Following immunoblot analysis, which in the arrested cells revealed no changes in cyclin D1 levels but raised and persistent levels of cyclin E and a gradual, and expected, decline of cyclin A, we quantitated cyclin E by cytofluorometry and found that while decreasing in the replicating cells, cyclin E levels in the arrested cells remained ectopically high, with resulting relative values greater than those of controls by about 60% to 90% (Fig. 3A). As ectopic expression of cyclin E can cause impairment of DNA replication due to defects in replication initiation (36), we investigated whether in the arrested cells DNA synthesis had been inhibited. We found that by day 2 of treatment, DNA synthesis had come to a halt (Fig. 3B). Because processes that interfere with DNA synthesis may result in the activation of DNA damage checkpoints and death by apoptosis (37), we turned our attention to the downstream kinase effectors of the DNA damage response pathways (37–39). Chk1 was not detectable but we found that Chk2, which is required for responses to DNA damage and replication block (37, 39), had been activated (Fig. 3C). This is of relevance as Chk2 can phosphorylate E2F-1, regulating its stability and transcriptional activity (38, 40), and be a cause of apoptotic induction in cells in which, in contrast to normal cells, E2F-1 is overexpressed (41, 42), as can be seen when comparing epithelial cells from the normal colon mucosa and the colon cancer cells of this investigation (Fig. 3D and E).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Cyclin E stabilization and arrest of DNA synthesis result in Chk2 activation. A, assessment of cyclin E by cytofluorometry in untreated (white histograms) and treated cells (black histograms). Numbers on histograms represent percentage differences between control and treated cells. B, DNA synthesis assessed by BrdUrd uptake. Inset numbers represent percentage of cells positive for BrdUrd. C, Western blot analyses of phosphorylated Chk2 in untreated and treated cells and in control cells treated with 1 mmol/L hydroxyurea (HU). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is shown as loading control. D, Western blot analyses representing constitutive E2F1 levels in epithelial cells from normal human colorectal mucosa (CM) and in SW480 cells. β-Actin is shown as loading control. E, Western blot analyses of E2F1 in untreated and treated cells. Slower migrating dense bands represent the phosphorylated protein. GAPDH is shown as loading control. Hu-r-βGBP 4 nmol/L was added 6 hours after seeding. Data are from single representative experiment.

Involvement of death receptors

Further to the rearrangement of cytoskeletal architecture (Fig. 2B), it is conceivable that rearrangement in the organization of subcortical actin may affect macromolecular mobility within the plane of the plasma membrane. We therefore investigated whether treatment with Hu-r-βGBP would affect the distribution pattern of the CD95/Fas death receptor which, as well as other death receptors (28), is a mediator of apoptosis, and examined whether the distribution pattern of Fas L would change accordingly. The evidence collected (Fig. 4) shows that as suggested by their colocation, CD95/Fas-Fas L clustering, a prime condition for the activation of an extrinsic apoptotic program, was detectable in each cell line.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Localization of CD95/Fas and FasL in controls and in treated cells. Control cells show punctate staining for both CD95/Fas (green) and FasL (red) with low levels of colocalization (bottom, merge). Treated cells show clustering of CD95/Fas (green) and clustering of FasL (red), which can be frequently found at the same localization on cell surfaces (bottom, merge). Examples of this clustering are indicated by arrowheads. Hu-r-βGBP 4 nmol/L was added 6 hours after seeding. SW480 cells fixed at hour 24 of treatment, SW620 and LoVo cells fixed at hour 48. Scale bars, 10 μm.

Hu-r-βGBP has efficacy in vivo

Next, we tested whether the therapeutic efficacy observed in vitro could be reproduced in an in vivo model. We implanted subcutaneously SW620 metastatic cells in nude mice and initiated treatment at a tumor volume of approximately 40 mm3 administering Hu-r-βGBP at doses conforming to the namomolar dosages (Fig. 5) used in the current and in previous in vitro experiments (21, 27, 30). Comparison of growth curves (Fig. 5A) shows that a 5-week period of treatment had inhibited xenograft growth by approximately 70%, with none of the treated mice appearing unhealthy as assessed by observation of behavior and body weight measurements.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Hu-r-βGBP inhibits tumor development in nude mice. A, rate of SW620 cell xenograft growth as related to dose response. Values are means ± SEM from groups of 7 mice. Doses in μg/kg conform to the nanomolar in vitro dosages used in the current experiments and in previous experiments (21, 30): 48 μg/kg = 3.2 nmol/L; 96 μg/kg = 6.4 nmol/L; 480 μg/kg = 32 nmol/L. Calculation based on arbitrary animal weight to volume equivalence of 1:1 (1 g = 1 mL). B, individually marked mice bearing small tumors (∼100–200 mm3 average size) at the end of a 5-week treatment. C, rate of tumor development in untreated control mice (C) from an average xenograft size of approximately 100 mm3 and rate of resumption of growth in the mice of B after cessation of treatment.

On further observation once the treatment had been stopped, we followed individually surviving mice bearing small tumors (∼100–200 mm3; Fig. 5B) and compared the rate of tumor growth resumption with the growth rate of control xenografts from an average volume of approximately 100 mm3 hence. Histograms show that resumption of tumor development proceeded at a slower rate and that in only 2 instances within a 9-week period xenograft size had approached the size attained in 3 weeks by the xenografts of the control mice (Fig. 5C).

Mutant PIK3CA does not confer resistance to Hu-r-βGBP

In addition to oncogenic Kras, in which frequency in human colorectal cancer is about 40%, activating mutations in the PIK3CA gene, also frequent in colorectal cancer (43), can induce oncogenicity (44) and tumor invasion (45). To investigate whether Hu-r-βGBP would be therapeutically effective in colorectal cancer cells bearing both mutations, we examined HCT116 and DLD1, both mutated at Kras-G13D (13) in which either the mutant or the wild-type PIK3CA allele had been deleted by homologous recombination to express 1 of 2 major hot spot mutations (44). In a tightly controlled experiment, we examined HCT116G13D cells harboring an H1047R alteration in exon 20 (kinase domain) and DLD1G13D cells, which have an E545K alteration in exon 9 (helical domain) paired with their isogenic wild-type counterparts. Our results show that compared with the wild type, the growth rate of cells harboring mutant PIK3CA was increased and apoptosis was delayed by 1 day (DLD1mut; Fig. 6A and B), but the response to Hu-r-βGBP was fundamentally similar in all cells whether PIK3CA wild type or mutant and similar to the response of the colorectal carcinoma cells of Figure 1, which are exempt of PIK3CA mutations. Inhibition of PI3K activity was followed by inhibition of cell proliferation and cell death assignable to the activation of an apoptotic program.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

Hu-r-βGBP overcomes Kras and PIK3CA mutations. A, growth curves show rate of cell proliferation as related to dose response in PIK3CA wild-type (wt) and in PIK3CA mutant (mut) colorectal cancer cells. Values are means of triplicate cultures ± SEM. Inset histograms represent PI3K activity as measurements of PIP3 expressed as percentages of controls. Values are means of triplicate measurements ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 versus controls. Hu-r-βGBP 8 nmol/L or 12 nmol/L (DLD1mut) was added 6 hours after seeding. B, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential assessed by tetramethylrhodamine ester (TMRE) staining at day 4 or 5 (DLD1mut). Inset values are percentages of cells committed to apoptosis (encircled area). Hu-r-βGBP was added 6 hours after seeding.

Discussion

Mutant-activated Kras defines a subset of patients with poor prognosis. We show that the PI3K inhibitor used in this study was remarkably efficacious. Hu-r-βGBP as a single agent induced apoptotic death in cancer cells harboring mutant-activated Kras, even when coexpressing an activating mutation in PIK3CA, and was therapeutically effective in vivo.

Unlike molecules designed to target critical hubs within signaling pathways, the βGBP molecule operates through mechanisms, which involve high-affinity receptor binding (26) and molecular interactions leading to functional inhibition of the p110 catalytic subunit of class IA and class IB PI3Ks with consequent loss of ERK (27) and Akt function (21). Surprisingly, in the cancer cells of this study, inhibition of PI3K activity was not characterized by loss of active ERK or active Akt, key prognostic therapeutic markers to βGBP response (46), whose phosphorylation state was instead increased but characterized by actin reorganization in a Rac-independent manner.

Although our data provide no indication that changes in actin organization were related to loss of Rac activity, the fact that phosphoinositides and PIP2 in particular have an important role in the binding and control of actin regulatory proteins (47) lends ground to infer that changes in PIP2 levels, turnover, or spatial distribution brought about by molecular interactions involved in βGBP receptor–PI3K communication (27) may affect plasma membrane–cytoskeletal linkages and have a causative role in the activation of 2 distinct sets of events critical to the initiation of an apoptotic program. One relating to a general rearrangement of the cytoskeleton, consequent cell-cycle checkpoint restrictions, and the ectopic accumulation of cyclin E whose bearing on the impairment of DNA replication provides a potential for errors in DNA repair and for the activation of an intrinsic apoptotic process. The other set of events relates, conceivably, to changes in cortical actin organization, increased macromolecular mobility within the plane of the plasma membrane, and clustering of death receptors, a critical condition for the activation of an extrinsic apoptotic process.

Two other aspects of our study deserve mention. One pertains to the importance that activating mutations in the PIK3CA gene have in conferring advantages that facilitate cell growth and invasion (44). Our data (Fig. 6) provide strong evidence that in colorectal carcinoma cells harboring PIK3CA further to oncogenic Ras, inhibition of PI3K activity was followed by the activation of a cell death program, underscoring that as single agent, Hu-r-βGBP had full therapeutic efficacy where combination targeting of PI3K and of Ras downstream effectors may instead be required (22, 24). The other key aspect relates to the ability of Hu-r-βGBP to strongly reduce tumor growth and to convert tumors that had survived a 5-week period of treatment from a faster to a slow developing (Fig. 5B and C) and, conceivably, a more benign tumor phenotype. On the basis of a model discussed in a previous report (21), this result may be interpreted as proof-of-principle evidence that cancer vulnerability in response to Hu-r-βGBP challenge is greater in the aggressive cancer phenotype, as a contained tumor growth after the end of treatment is suggestion of clonal selection through elimination of the more aggressive cells.

Recently, a number of compounds identified by high-throughput screening have been reported to have therapeutic efficacy against Kras-mutant cancer cells (13–16); however, among all candidate agents for the therapy of cancers harboring mutant-activated Ras, the βGBP molecule, a cytokine, by virtue of its physiologic nature is the only one, to our knowledge, which in the clinic would be implicitly exempt from drug toxicity and drug resistance. As, further to colorectal carcinoma, mutations in the Ras oncogenes and in genes involved in PI3K regulation extend to other cancers, our results suggest that Hu-r-βGBP is, potentially, a therapeutic agent that could provide benefit to a large number of patients.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: L. Mallucci, D.-y. Shi,

Development of methodology: D.-y. Shi, P. Jordan, L. Lotti, R. Mariani-Costantini

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): D.-y. Shi, P. Jordan, L. Lotti, R. Mariani-Costantini, F. Verginelli, V. Wells

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): L. Mallucci, D.-y. Shi, A. Nicol, L. Lotti, R. Mariani-Costantini, V. Wells, D. Zicha

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: L. Mallucci,

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): R. Mariani-Costantini, D. Zicha

Study supervision: L. Mallucci, V. Wells, D. Zicha

Grant Support

This work was supported by a KCL/PR China KC Wong fellowship award (D.-y. Shi), by 2 MIUR grants (L. Lotti and R. Mariani-Costantini), by AIRC grant # IG 9168 (R. Mariani-Costantini), and by funding from Cancer Research UK (D. Davies, P. Jordan, A. Nicol, and D. Zicha).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

PI3-Kinase ELISA Kits were generously provided by Echelon Biosciences. The authors are indebted to Bert Vogelstein (John Hopkins University) for generously providing cell lines HCT116 wt/null, HCT116 mut/null, DLD1 wt/null, and DLD1 mut/null; Julian Downward and Esther Castellano for advice and expertise about Rac assessment; Cosmo Rossi for management of xenograft study; Simone Martino for technical assistance; Roger Morris for his support; Paul Nielsen for his interest; and Giampietro Schiavo for critical reading of the manuscript. They also acknowledge with gratitude the artwork and kindness of the late Kate Kirwan.

  • Received December 21, 2011.
  • Revision received June 11, 2012.
  • Accepted June 12, 2012.
  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barbacid M
    . Ras genes. Annu Rev Biochem 1987;56:779–827.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cengel KA,
    2. Voong KR,
    3. Chandrasekaran S,
    4. Maggiorella L,
    5. Bruner S,
    6. Stanbridge S,
    7. et al.
    Oncogenic K-Ras signals through epidermal growth factor receptor and wild-type H-Ras to promote radiation survival in pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma cells. Neoplasia 2007;9:341–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mascaux C,
    2. Iannino N,
    3. Martin B,
    4. Paesmans M,
    5. Berghmans T,
    6. Dusart M,
    7. et al.
    The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer. A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2005;92:131–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pao W,
    2. Wang T,
    3. Riely GJ,
    4. Muiller VA,
    5. Pau Q,
    6. Ladanyi M,
    7. et al.
    KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoS Med 2005;2:e17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Massarelli E,
    2. Varella-Garcia M,
    3. Tang X,
    4. Xavier AC,
    5. Ozburn NC,
    6. Liu DD,
    7. et al.
    KRAS mutation is an important predictor of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non–small-cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:2890–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jhawer M,
    2. Goel S,
    3. Wilson AJ,
    4. Montagna C,
    5. Ling Y-H,
    6. Byun D-S,
    7. et al.
    PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. Cancer Res 2008;68:1953–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Van Cutsem E,
    2. Kohne C-H,
    3. Hitre E,
    4. Zaluski J,
    5. Chine C-RC,
    6. Makhson A,
    7. et al.
    Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1408–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Downward J
    . Targeting Ras signaling pathways in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:11–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gupta S,
    2. Ramjaun AR,
    3. Haiko P,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Warne PH,
    6. Nicke B,
    7. et al.
    Binding of Ras to phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110α is required for Ras-driven tumorigenesis in mice. Cell 2007;129:957–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kohl NE,
    2. Omer CA,
    3. Conner MW,
    4. Anthony NJ,
    5. Davide JP,
    6. Desolms SJ,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of farnesyltransferase induces regression of mammary and salivary carcinomas in ras transgenic mice. Nat Med 1995;1:792–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ji H,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Pereira S,
    4. Li D,
    5. Liang M-C,
    6. Zaghlul S,
    7. et al.
    Mutations in BRAF and KRAS converge on activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in lung cancer mouse models. Cancer Res 2007;67:4933–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rinehart J,
    2. Adjei AA,
    3. LoRusso PM,
    4. Waterhouse D,
    5. Hecht JR,
    6. Natale RB,
    7. et al.
    Multicellular phase II study of the oral MEK inhibitor, C1040, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4456–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Torrance CJ,
    2. Agrawal V,
    3. Vogelstein B,
    4. Kinzler KW
    . Use of isogenic human cancer cells for high-throughput screening and drug discovery. Nat Biotech 2001;19:940–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Dolma S,
    2. Lessnick SL,
    3. Hahn WC,
    4. Stockwell BR
    . Identification of genotype-selective antitumor agents using synthetic lethal chemical screening in engineered human tumor cells. Cancer Cell 2003;3:285–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Guo W,
    2. Wu S,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Fang B
    . Identification of a small molecule with synthetic lethality for K-Ras and protein kinase C iota. Cancer Res 2008;68:7403–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Shaw AT,
    2. Winslow MM,
    3. Magendantz M,
    4. Ouyang C,
    5. Dowdle J,
    6. Subramanian A,
    7. et al.
    Selective killing of K-ras mutant cancer cells by small molecule inducers of oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:8773–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hennessy BT,
    2. Smith DL,
    3. Ram PT,
    4. Lu Y,
    5. Mills GB
    . Exploiting the PI3K/Akt pathway for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2000;4:988–1004.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vivanco I,
    2. Sawyers CL
    . The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:489–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lim KH,
    2. Counter CM
    . Reduction in the requirement of oncogenic Ras signaling to activation of PI3K/AKT pathway during tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell 2005;8:381–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Shaw R,
    2. Cantley LC
    . Ras, PI(3)K and mTOR signaling controls tumour cell growth. Nature 2006;441:424–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wells V,
    2. Mallucci L
    . Phosphoinositide 3-kinase targeting by the β-galactoside binding protein cytokine negates akt gene expression and leads aggressive breast cancer cells to apoptotic death. Breast Cancer Res 2009;11:R2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Engelman JA,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Crosby K,
    5. Guimaraes AR,
    6. Upadhyay R,
    7. et al.
    Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med 2008;14:1351–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ihle NT,
    2. Lemos R Jr.,
    3. Wipf P,
    4. Yacoub A,
    5. Mitchell C,
    6. Siwak D,
    7. et al.
    Mutations in the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway predict for antitumor activity of the inhibitor PX-866 whereas oncogenic Ras is a dominant predictor for resistance. Cancer Res 2009;69:143–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Torbett NE,
    2. Luna-Moran A,
    3. Knight ZA,
    4. Houk A,
    5. Moasser M,
    6. Weiss W,
    7. et al.
    A chemical screen in diverse breast cancer cell lines reveals genetic enhancers and suppressors of sensitivity to PI3K isoform-selective inhibition. Biochem J 2008;415:97–110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Blaser C,
    2. Kaufman M,
    3. Muller C,
    4. Zimmerman C,
    5. Wells V,
    6. Mallucci L,
    7. et al.
    β-galactoside binding protein secreted by activated T cells inhibits antigen-induced proliferation of T cells. Eur J Immunol 1998;28:2311–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wells V,
    2. Mallucci L
    . Identification of an autocrine negative growth factor: mouse-β-galactoside binding protein is a cytostatic factor and cell growth regulator. Cell 1991;64:91–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Wells V,
    2. Downward J,
    3. Mallucci L
    . Functional inhibition of PI3K by the βGBP molecule suppresses Ras-MAPK signaling to block cell proliferation. Oncogene 2007;26:7709–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Cummins JM,
    2. Kohli M,
    3. Rago C,
    4. Kinsler KW,
    5. Vogelstein B,
    6. Bunz F
    . X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is a nonredundant modulator of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-mediated apoptosis in human cancer cells. Cancer Res 2004;64:3006–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zicha D,
    2. Genot E,
    3. Dunn GA,
    4. Kramer IM
    . TGFβ1 induces a cell cycle-dependent increase in motility of epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 1999;112:447–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ravatn R,
    2. Wells V,
    3. Nelson L,
    4. Vettori D,
    5. Mallucci L,
    6. Chin K-V
    . Circumventing multidrug resistance in cancer by β-galactoside binding protein, an antiproliferative cytokine. Cancer Res 2005;65:1631–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Carracedo A,
    2. Ma L,
    3. Teruya-Felstein J,
    4. Roojo F,
    5. Salmena L,
    6. Alimonti A,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of mTORC1 leads to MAPK pathway activation through a PI3K-dependent feedback loop in human cancer. J Clin Invest 2008;118:3065–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rosenthal DT,
    2. Iyer H,
    3. Escudero S,
    4. Bao L,
    5. Wu Z,
    6. Ventura AC,
    7. et al.
    p38γ promotes breast cancer cell motility and metastasis through regulation of RhoC GTPase, cytoskeletal architecture, and a novel leading edge behaviour. Cancer Res 2011;71:6338–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Burridge K,
    2. Wennerberg K
    . Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 2004;116:167–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Nobes D,
    2. Hawkins P,
    3. Stephens L,
    4. Hall A
    . Activation of the small GTP-binding proteins rho and rac by growth factor receptors. J Cell Sci 1995;108:225–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lambert M,
    2. Lambert QT,
    3. Reuther GW,
    4. Malliri A,
    5. Siderovski DP,
    6. Sondek J,
    7. et al.
    Tiam1 mediates Ras activation of Rac by a PI(3)K-independent mechanism. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4:621–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Ekholm-Reed S,
    2. Mendez J,
    3. Tedeco D,
    4. Zetterberg A,
    5. Stillman B,
    6. Reed SI
    . Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly. J Cell Biol 2004;165:789–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Zhou BB,
    2. Elledge SJ
    . The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 2000;408:433–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Lin WC,
    2. Lin FT,
    3. Nevins JR
    . Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation. Genes Dev 2001;15:1833–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kastan MB,
    2. Bartek J
    . Cell cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 2004;432:316–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Stevens C,
    2. Smith L,
    3. La Thangue NB
    . Chk2 activates E2F-1 in response to DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:401–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Krek W,
    2. Xu G,
    3. Livingston D
    . Cyclin A-kinase regulation of E2F-1 DNA binding function underlies suppression of an S phase checkpoint. Cell 1995;83:1149–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Fueyo J,
    2. Gomez-Manzano C,
    3. Jung WK,
    4. Liu TJ,
    5. Alemany R,
    6. McDonnell TJ,
    7. et al.
    Overexpression of E2F-1 in glioma triggers apoptosis and suppresses tumor growth in vitro and in vivo . Nat Med 1998;4:685–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Samuels Y,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Bardelli A,
    4. Silliman N,
    5. Ptak J,
    6. Szabo S,
    7. et al.
    High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 2004;304:554.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Bader AG,
    2. Kang S,
    3. Vogt P
    . Cancer specific mutations in PIK3CA are oncogenic in vivo . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:1475–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Samuels Y,
    2. Diaz L Jr.,
    3. Schmidt-Kittler O,
    4. Cummins JM,
    5. Delong L,
    6. Cheong I,
    7. et al.
    Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 2005;7:561–73
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Mallucci L,
    2. Wells V
    . βGBP, compositions comprising βGBP, and related methods and uses thereof. United States patent US 7994113. 2011 Aug 9.
  47. 47.↵
    1. Di Paolo G,
    2. De Camilli P
    . Phosphoinositides in cell regulation and membrane dynamics. Nature 2006;443:651–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 11 (9)
September 2012
Volume 11, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Killing of Kras-Mutant Colon Cancer Cells via Rac-Independent Actin Remodeling by the βGBP Cytokine, a Physiological PI3K Inhibitor Therapeutically Effective In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Killing of Kras-Mutant Colon Cancer Cells via Rac-Independent Actin Remodeling by the βGBP Cytokine, a Physiological PI3K Inhibitor Therapeutically Effective In Vivo
Livio Mallucci, Dong-yun Shi, Derek Davies, Peter Jordan, Alastair Nicol, Lavinia Lotti, Renato Mariani-Costantini, Fabio Verginelli, Valerie Wells and Daniel Zicha
Mol Cancer Ther September 1 2012 (11) (9) 1884-1893; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-1041-T

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Killing of Kras-Mutant Colon Cancer Cells via Rac-Independent Actin Remodeling by the βGBP Cytokine, a Physiological PI3K Inhibitor Therapeutically Effective In Vivo
Livio Mallucci, Dong-yun Shi, Derek Davies, Peter Jordan, Alastair Nicol, Lavinia Lotti, Renato Mariani-Costantini, Fabio Verginelli, Valerie Wells and Daniel Zicha
Mol Cancer Ther September 1 2012 (11) (9) 1884-1893; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-1041-T
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Sorafenib Targets VCP in Hepatocellular Cancer Cells
  • RSK2 as Therapeutic Target for Myeloma
  • Dll4-Fc Suppresses Liver Metastasis of SCLC Cells
Show more Therapeutic Discovery
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement