Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Reviews

Mesothelin-Targeted Agents in Clinical Trials and in Preclinical Development

Ronan J. Kelly, Elad Sharon, Ira Pastan and Raffit Hassan
Ronan J. Kelly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elad Sharon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ira Pastan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raffit Hassan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0454 Published March 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mesothelin is a tumor differentiation antigen that is highly expressed in several malignant diseases in humans, including malignant mesothelioma and pancreatic, ovarian, and lung adenocarcinomas. The limited expression of mesothelin on normal human tissues and its high expression in many common cancers make it an attractive candidate for cancer therapy. Several agents, including an immunotoxin, monoclonal antibody, antibody drug conjugate, and tumor vaccine, are in various stages of development to treat patients with mesothelin-expressing tumors. This review highlights ongoing clinical trials, as well as other approaches to exploit mesothelin for cancer therapy, that are in preclinical development. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(3); 517–25. ©2012 AACR.

Introduction

Mesothelin is a 40-kDa cell surface glycoprotein that is present on normal mesothelial cells lining the pleura, peritoneum, and pericardium (1). Mesothelin was originally identified as the antigen recognized by the mAb K1 that was produced by immunization of mice with the human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR3 (2). The mesothelin gene encodes a precursor protein of 71-kDa that is processed to yield a 31-kDa shed protein named megakaryocyte-potentiating factor (MPF) and the 40-kDa cell bound fragment mesothelin (3). MPF was isolated from the culture supernatant of a pancreatic cancer cell line, and in mouse bone marrow cultures it showed megakaryocyte colony-forming activity in the presence of interleukin-3 (4). By immunohistochemistry using anti-mesothelin mAbs, mesothelin expression in normal human tissues is noted only in the single layer of mesothelial cells that line the pleura, peritoneum, and pericardium, surface epithelial cells of the ovary, tunica vaginalis, rete testis, and the tonsillar and fallopian tube epithelial cells (2, 5). However, mesothelin is highly expressed in several human tumors, including epithelial mesotheliomas (∼100% of cases) and lung (∼50% of cases), ovarian (∼70% of cases), and pancreatic/biliary (∼100% of cases) adenocarcinomas (5–8). In the majority of these cancers there is diffuse, homogeneous cell-surface mesothelin expression. However, in contrast to other tumors, which show mostly membranous staining, the pattern of mesothelin reactivity in lung cancer shows mostly cytoplasmic staining (9). Mesothelin is also expressed in many other cancers, including gastric cancer, biphasic synovial sarcoma, and uterine adenocarcinoma (5). Previous reviews have described the frequency and characterization of mesothelin expression in different tumor types (3, 10).

The normal biological function of mesothelin is unknown. In one study, mutant mice that lacked both copies of the mesothelin gene had no detectable phenotype, and both male and female mice produced healthy offspring, suggesting that mesothelin is not involved in normal growth and development (11). Mesothelin may play a role in cell adhesion, and preclinical studies have shown that mesothelin is the receptor for the tumor antigen CA-125 (also known as MUC16), and that they bind to each other with a high specificity (12, 13). Tumors expressing CA-125 may bind to mesothelin expressed on the surface of mesothelial cells that line the pleural or peritoneal cavity, leading to an increase in heterotypic cell adhesion and promoting metastatic spread (12, 13). Studies in pancreatic cancer suggest that mesothelin plays a role in tumorigenesis by increasing cellular proliferation, migration, and S-phase cell populations (14). The exact biological role of MPF is also unclear. Wang and colleagues (15) recently showed that in cells overexpressing MPF, phosphorylation of the MAP kinase ERK1/2 was enhanced and the rate of cell death was decreased, leading to an increase in cell numbers. Although the function of mesothelin in cancer is not fully understood at this time, its limited expression on normal human tissues and high expression in many cancers makes it an attractive tumor-associated antigen for cancer therapy.

Clinical Trials of Mesothelin-Targeted Agents

Several different therapeutic agents are being evaluated for treatment of patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers (Table 1; refs. 16–25). These include antibody-based therapies with SS1(dsFv)-PE38 (SS1P, a recombinant immunotoxin that targets mesothelin), a high-affinity chimeric (mouse/human) mAb (IgG/κ, MORAb-009), and an anti-mesothelin antibody drug conjugate (ADC, BAY-94 9343). In addition, a mesothelin tumor vaccine (CRS-207) and adoptive T-cell immunotherapy using mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are also being evaluated in clinical trials.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Phase I/II clinical trials of mesothelin-targeted agents

Anti-mesothelin immunotoxin SS1P

The immunotoxin SS1P [SS1(dsFv)PE38] consists of an anti-mesothelin Fv that was obtained from a phage display library of mice immunized with recombinant mesothelin, genetically fused to a truncated form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin PE38. After it binds to cell-surface mesothelin via the Fv, PE38 is internalized into the cell, undergoes processing, and kills the cell due to inhibition of protein synthesis by ADP ribosylation and inactivation of elongation factor 2 (26). SS1P, which has a high affinity for mesothelin (Kd, 0.72M), is highly active against several mesothelin-expressing cell lines and causes regression of mesothelin-expressing xenografts in nude mice (27, 28). SS1P also showed cytotoxicity against tumor cells directly obtained from patients with ovarian cancer and mesothelioma (29, 30).

Preclinical studies showed marked antitumor synergy when SS1P was combined with several commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (31, 32). Although the combination of SS1P with chemotherapeutic agents did not result in synergy in cell culture, there was a marked increase in antitumor activity with the combination in tumor xenograft models. In a study using a mesothelin-expressing cell line (A431-K5) that was grown as a tumor xenograft in athymic nude mice, treatment with SS1P plus paclitaxel resulted in increased antitumor activity with durable complete tumor regressions compared with treatment with paclitaxel or SS1P alone (31). This enhancement of the cytotoxicity of SS1P by paclitaxel in vivo is not due to an indirect effect whereby paclitaxel increases tumor permeability by damaging tumor endothelial cells. Rather, it is due to the direct effect of paclitaxel on tumor cells. The mechanism for this synergy was evaluated with the use of a pair of mesothelin-expressing cervical cancer cell lines (KB) that are sensitive or resistant to paclitaxel as tumor xenografts in mice (33). The synergistic effect of paclitaxel and SS1P was only seen in paclitaxel-sensitive KB tumor xenografts. Killing of tumor cells by paclitaxel altered the tumor architecture and significantly decreased the concentration of shed mesothelin in the tumor extracellular fluid. These results suggest that the synergy between SS1P and chemotherapy is due to the ability of cytotoxics to decrease the shed mesothelin in the tumor extracellular space, which allows more of the administered SS1P to bind to tumor cells and results in increased cell killing. In addition, paclitaxel alters tumor architecture by killing tumor cells, allowing increased tumor penetration. On the basis of these preclinical studies, the combination of SS1P with chemotherapy is being evaluated in clinical trials involving mesothelin-expressing cancers.

A limitation of immunotoxin-based therapies such as SS1P is the development of neutralizing antibodies to the toxin portion of the molecule, which limits repeated administration of the drug to patients. Previous efforts to decrease the immune response to immunotoxins by various approaches, including the use of the anti–B-cell mAb rituximab, were unsuccessful (34). However, we recently showed that immune depletion using the regimen of pentostatin plus cyclophosphamide completely abrogated the anti-immunotoxin immune response in immunocompetent BALB/c mice when repeat injections of SS1P were administered (35). This regimen resulted in host B-cell and T-cell depletion with minimal myeloid cell depletion. A pilot clinical trial to evaluate this approach to decrease the immunogenicity of SS1P in patients has just opened to patient accrual (36).

Phase I clinical trials of single-agent SS1P.

Two phase I trials of SS1P have been conducted. The two trials used different schedules of administration, either as a bolus intravenous infusion or as a continuous infusion. In a phase I dose-escalation study, 34 patients with advanced mesothelin-expressing cancers (20 with mesothelioma, 12 with ovarian cancer, and 2 with pancreatic cancer) who had failed standard therapy were treated with SS1P given as a 30 min i.v. infusion every other day for either 3 or 6 doses (16). The first cohort of 17 patients received 6 doses of SS1P every other day for 6 doses with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 18 μg/kg/dose. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were grade 3 urticaria (1 patient) and grade 3 vascular leak syndrome (2 patients). A second cohort of 17 patients received only 3 doses with an MTD of 45 μg/kg/dose, with the DLT being grade 3 pleuritis. At the MTD of 45 μg/kg/dose, the mean Cmax of SS1P was 483 ng/mL and the half-life was 466 min. Of the 33 patients who were considered evaluable for response, 4 had minor responses, 19 had disease stabilization, and 10 had progressive disease.

In the second phase I trial, SS1P was administered as a continuous i.v. infusion over 10 days (17). Twenty-four patients (16 with mesothelioma, 7 with ovarian cancer, and 1 with pancreatic cancer) were enrolled at 5 different dose levels of SS1P. The MTD was 25 μg/kg/d as a 10-day continuous infusion, and the DLT was reversible vascular leak syndrome. As a single agent, SS1P has shown modest clinical activity, and continuous infusion shows no significant benefit over bolus dosing. Due to the ease of administration, as well as pharmacokinetic data that show high blood levels and a prolonged half-life of SS1P when given as a bolus dose, this schedule is being evaluated in combination studies with chemotherapy.

Phase I clinical trials of SS1P in combination with chemotherapy.

On the basis of preclinical studies that showed that the activity of SS1P can be increased when it is given in combination with chemotherapy, an ongoing clinical trial is evaluating SS1P in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin as frontline therapy for patients with advanced, unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the MTD and safety of SS1P in combination with chemotherapy, with secondary endpoints of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Enrolled patients receive 6 cycles of standard-care chemotherapy consisting of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. During the first 2 cycles, patients receive SS1P on days 1, 3, and 5 at escalating dose cohorts of 25 mcg/kg, 35 mcg/kg, 45 mcg/kg, and 55 mcg/kg. Results from the first 19 patients were recently reported. Investigators treated 5 patients at an SS1P dose of 25 mcg/kg, 3 patients at 35 mcg/kg, 10 patients at 45 mcg/kg, and 1 patient at 55 mcg/kg. Of the 14 evaluable patients treated at all dose levels, 7 had a partial response, 3 had stable disease, and 4 had progressive disease (18). However, of the 7 evaluable patients treated at the MTD of SS1P in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin, 5 had partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. Of the 10 patients whose serum mesothelin levels were evaluated before and at completion of treatment, all 5 patients who had a partial response showed a significant decrease in serum mesothelin (63–83%). Two of 3 patients with progressive disease had increased mesothelin levels (16–34%), and 1 patient had a slight decrease (7%). Two patients with stable disease had discordant responses (17% increase and 60% decrease). Overall, the combination of SS1P, cisplatin, and pemetrexed was well tolerated, with hypoalbuminemia, edema, and fatigue being the main side-effects. The trial is now in the expansion phase.

A phase I trial evaluating SS1P in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for treatment of patients with mesothelin-expressing stage IV lung adenocarcinoma was recently closed due to poor accrual, primarily because the incidence of mesothelin expression in the patients screened for this study was lower than the expected 50% positivity in lung adenocarcinoma. In addition, in similarity to findings in preclinical immunohistochemistry studies, the predominant pattern of tumor mesothelin staining was cytoplasmic rather than membranous reactivity (R. Hassan, unpublished data; ref. 9).

MORAb-009, a chimeric anti-mesothelin mAb

MORAb-009 consists of the heavy- and light-chain variable regions of a mouse anti-mesothelin single-chain Fv grafted to human IgG1 and κ constant regions. MORAb-009 has high affinity for mesothelin, with an affinity (KD) of 1.5 nM. In vitro MORAb-009 inhibits the adhesion between cell lines expressing mesothelin and MUC16, and mediates ADCC against mesothelin-positive ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and mesothelioma cell lines. In a tumor xenograft model using the mesothelin-positive cell line A431-K5, treatment with MORAb-009 in combination with gemcitabine or paclitaxel resulted in significant tumor shrinkage compared with MORAb-009 or chemotherapy alone (37). In toxicology studies in cynomolgus monkeys, repeated doses of MORAb-009 at 15 mg/kg were well tolerated. On the basis of these preclinical data, MORAb-009 was evaluated in clinical trials for patients whose tumors were mesothelin-positive.

Phase I dose-escalation study of MORAb-009.

To determine the safety and MTD of MORAb-009, investigators conducted a phase I clinical trial in patients with mesothelin-positive cancers who had failed standard treatment options for their disease. MORAb-009 was administered as an i.v. infusion at doses ranging from 12.5 to 400 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients with stable disease at day 35 could receive the next cycle of MORAb-009. A total of 24 patients (13 with mesothelioma, 7 with pancreatic cancer, and 4 with ovarian cancer) were enrolled in this study (19). The MTD of MORAb-009 was 200 mg/m2 with 2 patients at the 400 mg/m2 having DLT (grade 4 transaminitis and a grade 3 serum sickness). No objective response was noted, although 11 patients had stable disease.

An interesting observation during the phase I clinical trial was the effect of MORAb-009 on serum CA-125 kinetics. As noted above, laboratory studies suggest that mesothelin may be involved in tumor spread by binding to CA-125. In this phase I trial, 8 patients with mesothelioma had serum CA-125 levels measured at baseline and at different time points of MORAb-009 therapy (38). In all of these patients, and even in those who had normal CA-125 levels at baseline, treatment with MORAb-009 led to a marked increase in serum CA-125 levels. The increase in CA-125 levels was not due to inflammation or disease progression, because the CA-125 levels returned to baseline values once MORAb-009 treatment was stopped. These results suggest that MORAb-009 interferes with mesothelin CA-125 interaction in patients, and could have potential use for prevention of tumor metastasis in patients with mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.

Phase II clinical trials of MORAb-009 with chemotherapy.

Given the favorable safety profile of MORAb-009 and the possibility of clinical benefit, investigators initiated 2 phase II clinical trials to evaluate its efficacy in combination with chemotherapy. In the first trial, MORAb-009 was administered with gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (20). This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were not candidates for surgical resection. The patients were randomized to gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus MORAb-009. The primary outcome is overall survival, with PFS as a secondary endpoint. This trial has completed patient enrollment, but the results have not yet been published.

The second study is evaluating MORAb-009 as frontline therapy in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with unresectable epitheloid malignant pleural mesothelioma. Patients receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with MORAb-009 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Patients with tumor response or stable disease after 6 cycles of therapy will continue on MORAb-009 until disease progression occurs (21). The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate whether combination treatment with MORAb-009 plus pemetrexed and cisplatin improves PFS compared with the PFS observed in the pivotal phase III clinical trial of pemetrexed and cisplatin. No preliminary data have been reported yet, and the study is ongoing.

CRS-207, a mesothelin tumor vaccine

CRS-207 is a mesothelin vaccine that uses a live attenuated strain of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes (Lm), a facultative intracellular bacterium, as the vector (39). CRS-207 is based on CRS-100, which is an engineered vector that has deletions of the 2 genes that encode the virulence determinants actA and internalin B. These deletions result in a 1,000-fold decrease in virulence compared with the wild-type Lm. Preclinical studies showed that CRS-207 elicits human mesothelin-specific CD4+/CD8+ immunity in mice and cynomolgus monkeys, and exhibits therapeutic efficacy in tumor-bearing mice (39).

Phase I clinical trial of CRS-207.

A phase I clinical trial of CRS-207 for the treatment of patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers was conducted to determine the safety and MTD of CRS-207. The results of this trial were recently reported (22). In this phase I study, CRS-207 was administered i.v. every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses ranging from 1 × 108 to 1 × 1010 cfu. Seventeen patients (7 with pancreatic cancer, 5 with mesothelioma, 3 with lung cancer, and 2 with ovarian cancer) were treated. The MTD of CRS-207 was 1 × 109 cfu, with a DLT of hypotension observed at the 1 × 1010 cfu dose level. In this group of heavily pretreated patients, no objective antitumor response was observed. However, a mesothelin-specific T-cell response was observed in 5 of 10 patients tested. Based on the tolerability and immune activation, CRS-207 may be an attractive agent for treating mesothelin-expressing cancers either alone or in combination with other agents.

Phase II clinical trial of CRS-207 with GVAX pancreatic vaccine.

A phase II clinical trial of CRS-207 for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer has just opened for enrollment (23). In this phase II study, previously treated patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer will be randomized to either GVAX (irradiated pancreatic cancer cell lines that have been genetically modified to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) alone every 3 weeks × 6 doses or sequential administration of 2 doses of GVAX vaccine and 4 doses of CRS-207. The primary endpoint of this clinical trial is to determine whether administration of CRS-207 will improve overall survival compared with GVAX alone. Secondary endpoints include the safety of combining CRS-207 with GVAX, and monitoring CRS-207–induced Listeria and mesothelin-specific immune response.

Adoptive T-cell immunotherapy using mesothelin-specific CARs

Because tumor-associated antigens are poorly immunogenic, the generation of a T-cell response to these antigens is limited in patients (40). Over the last several years, investigators have developed different approaches to exploit T cells for cancer therapy, such as the administration of tumor-infiltrating T cells and adoptive transfer of T cells expressing T-cell receptors against tumor antigens, which have resulted in clinical activity in some tumors (41). An attractive approach to increase the specificity of these T cells for tumors is to use CARs, which can kill these cells in a non-HLA–restricted manner. A CAR consists of an antigen-specific portion of a mAb, such as Fv, and the signaling component of the T cells (usually the ζ chain of the TCR/CD3 complex). T cells expressing the CARs are specifically directed to tumor cells, and then the activation of T cells kills the tumor (42). Adoptive transfer of T cells expressing CARs has shown promise in several cancers (43). Mesothelin is an attractive candidate for T-cell adoptive therapy using CARs, and preclinical studies have shown its efficacy in animal models. Carpenito and colleagues (44) generated a CAR that recognizes mesothelin using anti-mesothelin single-chain Fv fused to the T-cell receptor ζ signal transduction domain, as well as CD28 and CD137(4-1BB) domains. They then evaluated the T cells transduced with these CARs for efficacy using lentiviral vectors against mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts in NOD/scid/IL2rγ−/− mice. Both intratumoral and i.v. administration of these transduced T cells resulted in significant shrinkage of these large, established mesothelin-expressing tumors. T cells expressing CARs that contained the CD28 and CD137 domains had greater efficacy than CARs expressing only the T-cell receptor ζ signaling domain (44). Recently, the same group described an alternative method that may be safer than the retroviral or lentiviral vector transduction method. The use of RNA encoding an anti-mesothelin CAR for T-cell transduction showed robust activity against mesothelin-expressing xenografts (45). One advantage of RNA CAR T-cell therapy is that it avoids the potential risk of malignant transformation from insertional mutagenesis using retroviral or lentiviral constructs. In addition, if toxicity due to CAR T-cell therapy occurs, it can be reduced by stopping the administration of RNA CAR T cells, which is not the case with stably transduced T cells using viral vectors. A phase I clinical trial of adoptive T-cell therapy using mesothelin-directed CARs has been initiated for treatment of patients with pleural mesothelioma (24).

ADCs targeting mesothelin

The limited expression of mesothelin on essential human tissues makes it a good target for ADCs. Although no mesothelin-targeted ADC is yet in clinical use, some of these compounds, including MDX-1204 and BAY 94-9343, have undergone preclinical development. The anti-mesothelin ADC MDX-1204 consists of the human anti-mesothelin mAb MDX-1382 conjugated to duocarmycin, a DNA alkylating agent (46). This compound showed antitumor efficacy against mesothelin-expressing xenografts in mice, and at clinically relevant doses was well tolerated by cynomolgus monkeys without any clinical toxicity due to the antibody binding to mesothelin. Another anti-mesothelin ADC is BAY 94-9343, which consists of the fully human anti-mesothelin IgG1 linked to DM4, a potent tubulin-binding drug (47). This drug conjugate showed cytotoxicity against mesothelin-positive cell lines with IC50 in the nanomolar range, as well as antitumor activity against mesothelin-expressing ovarian, pancreatic, and mesothelioma tumor xenografts. A phase I clinical trial of BAY 94-9343 recently opened for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objectives of this trial are to determine the safety and MTD of BAY 94-9343, and to study its pharmacokinetics (25).

Mesothelin-Directed Therapies in Preclinical Development

Various approaches to target mesothelin for cancer therapy are currently in preclinical development, and below we discuss some of these methods.

Mesothelin cancer vaccines

Several lines of work support the use of mesothelin vaccination for cancer therapy. In one study, anti-mesothelin IgG antibodies were shown to be present in 39% and 41% of patients with advanced mesothelin-expressing mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, respectively (48). This suggests that at least in some patients, the tolerance to mesothelin breaks down. In addition, in a clinical trial of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were receiving vaccination with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating-secreting pancreatic cancer cell lines (CG8020/CG2505), a strong mesothelin-specific CD8+ T-cell response was observed in 3 of 14 patients who developed a delayed-type hypersensitivity response following vaccination (49). In a subsequent clinical trial of this whole-cell vaccine for metastatic pancreatic cancer, the investigators observed mesothelin-specific CD8+ T cells in most of the patients at baseline, but this response was augmented after vaccination (50).

In several preclinical studies, researchers have evaluated the use of mesothelin as a tumor vaccine using different strategies. Yokokawa and colleagues (51) identified 2 novel HLA-2 mesothelin epitopes recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocyte. T cells generated from these native or agonist mesothelin epitopes lysed mesothelin-expressing pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer cells, and mesothelioma cell lines. In addition, using a DNA vaccine encoding human mesothelin, Chang and colleagues (52) showed efficacy in a mouse model by generating both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as an antibody-mediated immune response to mesothelin. Other vaccine strategies, such as targeting mesothelin directly to dendritic cells using mAbs or using dendritic cells transduced with full-length mesothelin, have also shown enhanced induction of mesothelin-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity (53, 54). In another study, vaccination with chimeric virus-like particles that contained human mesothelin substantially inhibited tumor progression in mice, with increases in mesothelin-specific antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity (14). It is likely that some of these vaccination strategies will be evaluated in clinical trials in the near future.

Mesothelin-directed gene therapy

Given the potential toxicity of systemic gene therapy to nontarget tissues, such as the liver, a gene therapy with the ability to specifically target tumor cells is clinically desirable. Breidenbach and colleagues (55) conducted studies to evaluate mesothelin as a target for adenoviral vectors for gene therapy of ovarian cancer. Using established ovarian cancer cell lines and purified tumor cells obtained from patients, they showed high mesothelin gene and protein expression. Adenoviruses that contained the mesothelin promoter driving reporter gene expression showed that the mesothelin promoter was activated in ovarian cancer cell lines but not in normal control cells. In addition, in an in vivo study in mice, the adenovirus construct containing the mesothelin promoter had a low expression in the liver, making it potentially useful for the clinic. To further improve on targeting of adenoviruses for gene therapy of ovarian cancer, the authors conjugated an adenovirus vector containing an Fc-binding domain to a mouse anti-human mesothelin mAb. This transductional targeting approach resulted in increased transgene expression in ovarian cancer cells and showed the use of mesothelin targeting for ovarian cancer gene therapy.

The use of conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAd) that contain tumor-specific promoters restricts virus replication to cancer cells. Tsuruta and colleagues (56) tested the efficacy of a mesothelin promoter-based CRAd with a chimeric Ad5/3 fiber (AdMSLNCRAd5/3) against a human ovarian cancer xenograft model in immunodeficient mice. AdMSLNCRAd5/3 treatment resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and improved the overall survival of these mice compared with no virus administration or wild-type adenovirus administration (56). Gene therapy has clearly shown some promise in preclinical models. Clinical testing will ultimately determine the efficacy of mesothelin-directed gene therapy, and future studies are planned.

Conclusions

Mesothelin is a tumor differentiation antigen that has limited expression on normal human tissues but is highly expressed in several malignant diseases, which makes it a good candidate for cancer therapy. Thus far, clinical trials of an anti-mesothelin immunotoxin and mAb, as well as a mesothelin vaccine, have shown encouraging activity without any untoward toxicity due to targeting of normal mesothelial cells that express mesothelin. In addition to the mesothelin-targeted therapies currently in the clinic (i.e., SS1P, MORAb-009, BAY 94-9343, CRS-207, and adoptive T-cell immunotherapy), several other agents are in various stages of preclinical development. Although the preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted to date have validated mesothelin as a drug target, the ongoing clinical trials, some of which have just been initiated, will determine whether mesothelin-targeted therapies benefit patients.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

  • Received June 24, 2011.
  • Revision received November 30, 2011.
  • Accepted November 30, 2011.
  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chang K,
    2. Pastan I
    . Molecular cloning of mesothelin, a differentiation antigen present on mesothelium, mesotheliomas, and ovarian cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:136–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chang K,
    2. Pastan I,
    3. Willingham MC
    . Isolation and characterization of a monoclonal antibody, K1, reactive with ovarian cancers and normal mesothelium. Int J Cancer 1992;50:373–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Bera T,
    3. Pastan I
    . Mesothelin: a new target for immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3937–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yamaguchi N,
    2. Hattori K,
    3. Oh-eda M,
    4. Kojima T,
    5. Imai N,
    6. Ochi N
    . A novel cytokine exhibiting megakaryocyte potentiating activity from a human pancreatic tumor cell line HPC-Y5. J Biol Chem 1994;269:805–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ordóñez NG
    . Application of mesothelin immunostaining in tumor diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:1418–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ordóñez NG
    . Value of mesothelin immunostaining in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 2003;16:192–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Argani P,
    2. Iacobuzio-Donahue C,
    3. Ryu B,
    4. Rosty C,
    5. Goggins M,
    6. Wilentz RE,
    7. et al.
    Mesothelin is overexpressed in the vast majority of ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas: identification of a new pancreatic cancer marker by serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:3862–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Kreitman RJ,
    3. Pastan I,
    4. Willingham MC
    . Localization of mesothelin in epithelial ovarian cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2005;13:243–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Miettinen M,
    2. Sarlomo-Rikala M
    . Expression of calretinin, thrombomodulin, keratin 5, and mesothelin in lung carcinomas of different types: an immunohistochemical analysis of 596 tumors in comparison with epithelioid mesotheliomas of the pleura. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:150–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Ho M
    . Mesothelin targeted cancer immunotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:46–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bera TK,
    2. Pastan I
    . Mesothelin is not required for normal mouse development or reproduction. Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:2902–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Rump A,
    2. Morikawa Y,
    3. Tanaka M,
    4. Minami S,
    5. Umesaki N,
    6. Takeuchi M,
    7. et al.
    Binding of ovarian cancer antigen CA125/MUC16 to mesothelin mediates cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2004;279:9190–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gubbels JA,
    2. Belisle J,
    3. Onda M,
    4. Rancourt C,
    5. Migneault M,
    6. Ho M,
    7. et al.
    Mesothelin-MUC16 binding is a high affinity, N-glycan dependent interaction that facilitates peritoneal metastasis of ovarian tumors. Mol Cancer 2006;5:50–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Bharadwaj U,
    3. Zhang R,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Mu H,
    6. Fisher WE,
    7. et al.
    Mesothelin is a malignant factor and therapeutic vaccine target for pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:286–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wang T,
    2. Kajino K,
    3. Abe M,
    4. Tan K,
    5. Maruo M,
    6. Sun G,
    7. et al.
    Suppression of cell death by the secretory form of N-terminal ERC/mesothelin. Int J Mol Med 2010;26:185–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Bullock S,
    3. Premkumar A,
    4. Kreitman RJ,
    5. Kindler H,
    6. Willingham MC,
    7. et al.
    Phase I study of SS1P, a recombinant anti-mesothelin immunotoxin given as a bolus I.V. infusion to patients with mesothelin-expressing mesothelioma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:5144–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kreitman RJ,
    2. Hassan R,
    3. Fitzgerald DJ,
    4. Pastan I
    . Phase I trial of continuous infusion anti-mesothelin recombinant immunotoxin SS1P. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:5274–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Sharon E,
    3. Schuler B,
    4. Mallory Y,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Ling A,
    7. et al.
    Antitumor activity of SS1P with pemetrexed and cisplatin for front-line treatment of pleural mesothelioma and utility of serum mesothelin as a marker of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 29:15s, 2011 (suppl; abstr 7026).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Cohen SJ,
    3. Phillips M,
    4. Pastan I,
    5. Sharon E,
    6. Kelly RJ,
    7. et al.
    Phase I clinical trial of the chimeric anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody MORAb-009 in patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:6132–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Identifier: NCT00570713.
  21. 21.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Identifier: NCT00738582.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Le DT,
    2. Nir-Paz R,
    3. Hamp J,
    4. Mathur S,
    5. Neumanitis J,
    6. Steiman D,
    7. et al.
    Results of phase I studies testing two live-attenuated Listeria vaccines, ANZ-100 and CrS-207, for the treatment of cancer. AACR Conference, Tumor Immunology: Basic and Clinical Advances, Nov 30–Dec 3, 2010, Miami Beach, FL (Abstract).
  23. 23.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Identifier: NCT01417000.
  24. 24.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Identifier: NCT01355965.
  25. 25.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Identifier: NCT01439152.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pastan I,
    2. Hassan R,
    3. FitzGerald DJ,
    4. Kreitman RJ
    . Immunotoxin treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Med 2007;58:221–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Chowdhury PS,
    2. Viner JL,
    3. Beers R,
    4. Pastan I
    . Isolation of a high-affinity stable single-chain Fv specific for mesothelin from DNA-immunized mice by phage display and construction of a recombinant immunotoxin with anti-tumor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:669–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Chowdhury PS,
    2. Pastan I
    . Improving antibody affinity by mimicking somatic hypermutation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 1999;17:568–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Lerner MR,
    3. Benbrook D,
    4. Lightfoot SA,
    5. Brackett DJ,
    6. Wang QC,
    7. et al.
    Antitumor activity of SS(dsFv)PE38 and SS1(dsFv)PE38, recombinant antimesothelin immunotoxins against human gynecologic cancers grown in organotypic culture in vitro. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:3520–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Li Q,
    2. Verschraegen CF,
    3. Mendoza J,
    4. Hassan R
    . Cytotoxic activity of the recombinant anti-mesothelin immunotoxin, SS1(dsFv)PE38, towards tumor cell lines established from ascites of patients with peritoneal mesotheliomas. Anticancer Res 2004;24 [3a]:1327–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Xiang L,
    3. Hassan R,
    4. Paik CH,
    5. Carrasquillo JA,
    6. Jang BS,
    7. et al.
    Synergistic antitumor activity of taxol and immunotoxin SS1P in tumor-bearing mice. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:4695–701.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Broaddus VC,
    3. Wilson S,
    4. Liewehr DJ,
    5. Zhang J
    . Anti-mesothelin immunotoxin SS1P in combination with gemcitabine results in increased activity against mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:7166–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Xiang L,
    3. Hassan R,
    4. Pastan I
    . Immunotoxin and Taxol synergy results from a decrease in shed mesothelin levels in the extracellular space of tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:17099–104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Williams-Gould J,
    3. Watson T,
    4. Pai-Scherf L,
    5. Pastan I
    . Pretreatment with rituximab does not inhibit the human immune response against the immunogenic protein LMB-1. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:16–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mossoba ME,
    2. Onda M,
    3. Taylor J,
    4. Massey PR,
    5. Treadwell S,
    6. Sharon E,
    7. et al.
    Pentostatin plus cyclophosphamide safely and effectively prevents immunotoxin immunogenicity in murine hosts. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:3697–705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Identifier: NCT01362790.
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Ebel W,
    3. Routhier EL,
    4. Patel R,
    5. Kline JB,
    6. Zhang J,
    7. et al.
    Preclinical evaluation of MORAb-009, a chimeric antibody targeting tumor-associated mesothelin. Cancer Immun 2007;7:20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hassan R,
    2. Schweizer C,
    3. Lu KF,
    4. Schuler B,
    5. Remaley AT,
    6. Weil SC,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of mesothelin-CA-125 interaction in patients with mesothelioma by the anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibody MORAb-009: Implications for cancer therapy. Lung Cancer 2010;68:455–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Brockstedt DG,
    2. Giedlin MA,
    3. Leong ML,
    4. Bahjat KS,
    5. Gao Y,
    6. Luckett W,
    7. et al.
    Listeria-based cancer vaccines that segregate immunogenicity from toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:13832–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Drake CG,
    2. Jaffee E,
    3. Pardoll DM
    . Mechanisms of immune evasion by tumors. Adv Immunol 2006;90:51–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Morgan RA,
    2. Dudley ME,
    3. Wunderlich JR,
    4. Hughes MS,
    5. Yang JC,
    6. Sherry RM,
    7. et al.
    Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science 2006;314:126–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Ramos CA,
    2. Dotti G
    . Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered lymphocytes for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2011;11:855–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Till BG,
    2. Jensen MC,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Chen EY,
    5. Wood BL,
    6. Greisman HA,
    7. et al.
    Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells. Blood 2008;112:2261–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Carpenito C,
    2. Milone MC,
    3. Hassan R,
    4. Simonet JC,
    5. Lakhal M,
    6. Suhoski MM,
    7. et al.
    Control of large, established tumor xenografts with genetically retargeted human T cells containing CD28 and CD137 domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:3360–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Moon E,
    3. Carpenito C,
    4. Paulos CM,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Brennan AL,
    7. et al.
    Multiple injections of electroporated autologous T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor mediate regression of human disseminated tumor. Cancer Res 2010;70:9053–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Rao C,
    2. Huber M,
    3. Vemuri K,
    4. Zhang Q,
    5. Chen B,
    6. Phillips J,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy and toxicity of an anti-mesothelin antibody drug conjugate [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2009 Apr 18–22, Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; 2009. Abstract nr 3235.
  47. 47.↵
    1. Golfier S,
    2. Kahnert A,
    3. Heisler I,
    4. Kopitz C,
    5. Berhirster K,
    6. Stelte-Ludwig B,
    7. et al.
    Identification of BAY 94-9343, a mesothelin antibody-drug conjugate (ADC): characterization and anti-tumor activity in mesothelin-positive preclinical tumor models. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2–6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR: 2011. Abstract nr 1754.
  48. 48.↵
    1. Ho M,
    2. Hassan R,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Wang QC,
    5. Onda M,
    6. Bera T,
    7. et al.
    Humoral immune response to mesothelin in mesothelioma and ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:3814–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Thomas AM,
    2. Santarsiero LM,
    3. Lutz ER,
    4. Armstrong TD,
    5. Chen YC,
    6. Huang LQ,
    7. et al.
    Mesothelin-specific CD8(+) T cell responses provide evidence of in vivo cross-priming by antigen-presenting cells in vaccinated pancreatic cancer patients. J Exp Med 2004;200:297–306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Laheru D,
    2. Lutz E,
    3. Burke J,
    4. Biedrzycki B,
    5. Solt S,
    6. Onners B,
    7. et al.
    Allogeneic granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting tumor immunotherapy alone or in sequence with cyclophosphamide for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a pilot study of safety, feasibility, and immune activation. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:1455–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Yokokawa J,
    2. Palena C,
    3. Arlen P,
    4. Hassan R,
    5. Ho M,
    6. Pastan I,
    7. et al.
    Identification of novel human CTL epitopes and their agonist epitopes of mesothelin. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6342–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Chang CL,
    2. Wu TC,
    3. Hung CF
    . Control of human mesothelin-expressing tumors by DNA vaccines. Gene Ther 2007;14:1189–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Miyazawa M,
    2. Iwahashi M,
    3. Ojima T,
    4. Katsuda M,
    5. Nakamura M,
    6. Nakamori M,
    7. et al.
    Dendritic cells adenovirally-transduced with full-length mesothelin cDNA elicit mesothelin-specific cytotoxicity against pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. Cancer Lett 2011;305:32–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Wang B,
    2. Kuroiwa JM,
    3. He LZ,
    4. Charalambous A,
    5. Keler T,
    6. Steinman RM
    . The human cancer antigen mesothelin is more efficiently presented to the mouse immune system when targeted to the DEC-205/CD205 receptor on dendritic cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1174:6–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Breidenbach M,
    2. Rein DT,
    3. Everts M,
    4. Glasgow JN,
    5. Wang M,
    6. Passineau MJ,
    7. et al.
    Mesothelin-mediated targeting of adenoviral vectors for ovarian cancer gene therapy. Gene Ther 2005;12:187–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Tsuruta Y,
    2. Pereboeva L,
    3. Breidenbach M,
    4. Rein DT,
    5. Wang M,
    6. Alvarez RD,
    7. et al.
    A fiber-modified mesothelin promoter-based conditionally replicating adenovirus for treatment of ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:3582–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 11 (3)
March 2012
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mesothelin-Targeted Agents in Clinical Trials and in Preclinical Development
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Mesothelin-Targeted Agents in Clinical Trials and in Preclinical Development
Ronan J. Kelly, Elad Sharon, Ira Pastan and Raffit Hassan
Mol Cancer Ther March 1 2012 (11) (3) 517-525; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0454

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Mesothelin-Targeted Agents in Clinical Trials and in Preclinical Development
Ronan J. Kelly, Elad Sharon, Ira Pastan and Raffit Hassan
Mol Cancer Ther March 1 2012 (11) (3) 517-525; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0454
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Clinical Trials of Mesothelin-Targeted Agents
    • Mesothelin-Directed Therapies in Preclinical Development
    • Conclusions
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Patient Selection Strategies for Antibody–Drug Conjugates
  • Allosteric Inhibition of ABL1 and ABL2
  • ATM Dysfunction in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Show more Reviews
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement