Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Preclinical Development

Targeting the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF Signaling Pathway as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Obesity-Related Breast Cancer

Chun-Te Chen, Yi Du, Hirohito Yamaguchi, Jung-Mao Hsu, Hsu-Ping Kuo, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi and Mien-Chie Hung
Chun-Te Chen
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Du
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hirohito Yamaguchi
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jung-Mao Hsu
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hsu-Ping Kuo
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mien-Chie Hung
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
Departments of 1Molecular and Cellular Oncology and 2Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 3Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 4Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University; and 5Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0180 Published October 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Clinical correlation studies have clearly shown that obesity is associated with breast cancer risk and patient survival. Although several potential mechanisms linking obesity and cancers have been proposed, the detailed molecular mechanism of obesity-mediated breast tumorigenesis has not yet been critically evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the effects of obesity on mammary tumor initiation and progression using mice with genetic and diet-induced obesity bearing mammary tumor xenografts and mouse mammary tumor virus-neu transgenic mice that were fed a high-fat diet. We show that obesity promoted mammary tumor growth and development in these animal models. Moreover, the expressions of TNFα, VEGF, IKKβ, and mTOR are upregulated in mammary tumors of obese mice, suggesting that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway is activated by TNFα in the tumors of obese mice. More importantly, inhibitors (rapamycin, bevacizumab, and aspirin) that target members of the pathway suppressed tumorigenesis and prolonged survival more effectively in obese mice than in nonobese mice. Here, we not only identified a specific signaling pathway that contributes to mammary tumorigenesis in obese mice but also a strategy for treating obesity-mediated breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(10); 2212–21. ©2012 AACR.

Introduction

Obesity is a serious health problem in the United States and is associated with increased risk of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, growing evidence has shown that obesity is a risk factor for multiple types of human cancer (1–4) and known to be correlated with breast cancer tumorigenesis and development (5, 6). Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women in the United States, and obese breast cancer patients have a higher risk of recurrent disease, higher metastasis and mortality rates, larger tumor masses, and a poorer prognosis than nonobese breast cancer patients (7–12).

Several mechanisms relating to breast cancer prognosis in obese patients have been proposed. For example, estrogen (13, 14), which is expressed at significantly higher levels in obese postmenopausal women than in nonobese postmenopausal women is believed to increase the risks of developing breast cancer (6). The expression of insulin and insulin-like growth factors, which is also higher in obese patients, has also been proposed to play a role in breast cancer cell growth and survival (15). In addition, adipose tissues that secrete adipokines, such as leptin, adiponectin, growth factors, and proinflammatory cytokines, also enhance cancer cell growth (16–18). Particularly, recent studies have indicated that expression of the inflammatory cytokine TNFα is increased in obese patients, thereby suggesting that this cytokine plays a role in obesity-mediated breast cancer development and progression (19, 20). However, the specific signaling pathway linking TNFα and obesity to breast tumorigenesis and the exact mechanisms underlying the connection between obesity and breast cancer are still a matter of debate. Thus, investigating signaling pathways involved in obesity-mediated breast cancer, which could lead to the development of targeted therapies that inhibit obesity-related tumor growth, is a significant and timely goal.

Previously, we showed that TNFα induces the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway to promote breast cancer progression by enhancing angiogenesis (21). The activated TNFα receptor activates IKKβ, which in turn phosphorylates tuberous sclerosis protein 1 (TSC1) and actives the downstream signaling pathway such as mTOR. Moreover, IKKβ activation, TSC1 phosphorylation, and VEGF expression are correlated with poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients (21). Because obese patients have higher levels of adipocytes and thus can secrete more TNFα (22), we speculated that this newly identified mechanism could link TNFα-activated IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF (23) to obesity and therefore contribute to obesity-mediated breast cancer progression.

In this study, we sought to determine the effects of obesity on mammary tumor progression using 2 different mouse models of obesity: mice with genetic and diet-induced obesity (DIO) bearing orthotopic xenograft mammary tumors. Moreover, we also assessed the effects of DIO on tumor initiation in a mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-neu model. Using these models, we clearly showed that obesity promotes both the development and growth of mammary tumors. More importantly, we found that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway was highly activated by TNFα in the tumors of obese mice, and inhibition of this pathway with clinically used drugs reduced obesity-mediated tumorigenesis. Thus, our study may provide not only a molecular interpretation for the higher incidence of breast cancer and poor prognosis in obese women but also a new avenue from which to develop therapeutic strategies for obesity-mediated breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines

EO771 mouse mammary cancer cells were obtained from Dr. F.M. Sirotnak (Memorial Sloan-Kettering, New York, NY). No further authentication was carried out. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS.

Animal model

We purchased 4-week-old female C57BL/6J wild-type (WT), B6.V-Lepob/J obese (OB), and MMTV-neu mice (10 per group) from The Jackson Laboratory and maintained them under the institutional animal care protocol established by the Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The C57BL/6J and MMTV-neu mice were fed either a high-fat diet (HFD; Research Diets, Inc. D12492; ref. 24) or a normal chow diet (Teklad Global Diets, #2919; Supplementary Table S1) starting at 4 weeks of age. DIO was initiated in mice via ad libitum access to high-fat food for at least 8 to 12 weeks as described previously (25) until the experiments were completed. Normal chow diet and HFD mice were injected with 2 × 105 EO771 mammary adenocarcinoma cells at age 14 weeks. The OB mice, which spontaneously develop obesity even on normal chow diet (26, 27), were fed only the normal chow diet and injected with 2 × 105 EO771 mammary adenocarcinoma cells at age 14 weeks. Mice were removed from the experiment when tumor size reached more than 1.5 cm diameters in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. The incidence of spontaneous tumor growth in MMTV-neu mice was noted when tumors growth was larger than 5 mm in diameter in the mammary gland. MMTV-neu develops mammary tumors spontaneously at about age 6 to 12 months (28, 29).

For the mammary tumor model, 2 × 105 EO771 cells were injected into the mammary fat pads of 14-week-old C57BL/6J or OB mice. After the tumors reached 3 to 5 mm in diameter, the mice were administered aspirin at 120 mg/kg/d (Sigma) via subcutaneous injection (30); rapamycin (LC Labs) at 5 mg/kg twice per week via intraperitoneal injection (31); and bevacizumab (Avastin, purchased from the Department of Pharmacy at MD Anderson Cancer Center) at 10 mg/kg once per week via intravenous injection (32).

Immunofluorescence assay

Mammary tumor tissue was harvested and embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek) for frozen embedded and sectioned. The tumor samples were stained separately with anti-TNFα and anti-VEGF (IHC World); phosphorylated IKKβ (S176/180) [pIKKβ (S176/180)], phosphorylated S6 (S240/244) [pS6 (S240/244), (an indicator for mTOR activity)]; phosphorylated VEGF receptor (S996) [pIKKβ (S996)]; the previous 3 antibodies from Cell Signaling Technology); CD31 and CD45 antibody (BD Biosciences); Ki67 antibody as an indicator of cancer cell proliferation (Abcam). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole blue and fluorescence intensity was analyzed using AxioVision software version 4.4 (Carl Zeiss).

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as the mean ± SD of 10 individual mice or treatments. Statistical significance between groups was analyzed using a Student t test or one-way or 2-way ANOVA. Survival was analyzed using a Kaplan–Meier plot, and MMTV-neu mice tumor incidence was measured via a log-rank test (Mantel–Cox test; refs. 33, 34). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant and is henceforth indicated by an asterisk.

Results

Genetic obesity and DIO promote mammary tumorigenesis and increase mortality

Although clinical evidence indicates that obesity is one of the major risk factors for breast cancer (35) and despite the fact that researchers have proposed several mechanisms by which obesity and tumor progression are linked, limited information is available about the causal relationships between the molecular mechanisms and obesity-mediated breast cancer. To further explore the underlying mechanisms of obesity-mediated breast cancer, we first used 2 kinds of obesity mouse models, DIO and genetic obesity, to establish mammary tumor xenograft in these mice and further investigated the effects of obesity tumor progression.

We monitored the body weight of mice in these 2 models first and confirmed that these mice weighed more than control mice (Fig. 1A and B, top panels). We then established mammary tumors in these mice and observed significantly higher tumor growth in obese mice (HFD/DIO and OB) than in lean mice (normal chow diet and WT) in both models (Fig. 1A and B, middle panels). Moreover, the survival rates of obese mice in both models were significantly lower than those of the control mice (Fig. 1A and B, bottom panels). Similar results were observed in the 4T1 mouse mammary tumor models (Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B). Together, these results indicated that obesity promoted mammary tumor growth in vivo and reduced median survival and that these animal models are feasible for studying the underlying mechanisms of obesity-mediated tumor progression.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Genetic and dietary obesity promotes mammary tumorigenesis and increases mice mortality. A, C57BL/6J female mice that were fed a HFD or normal diet. B, genetic obese B6.V-Lepob/J (OB) mice that were fed normal chow diet. Top, the body weights of genetic obese and diet-induced obese mice as well as control mice were monitored. Middle, in both HFD-induced obese mice and genetic obese mice, 2 × 105 EO771 mammary adenocarcinoma cells were injected into the mammary fat pads at the time indicated by the arrow. Tumor growth was monitored twice a week. Bottom, survival rate of C57BL/6J female mice that were fed HFD or normal chow diet; survival rate of genetic obese B6.V-Lepob/J (OB) mice or control mice. Mice were removed from the experiment when tumor size reached above 1.5 cm diameter in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. The data represent the mean ± SD (10 mice per group). ND, normal chow diet. *, P < 0.05.

In a previous study, we showed that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway was more highly activated by TNFα in the livers of obese mice that had been fed an HFD than in the livers of normal-weight mice that had been fed a normal chow diet (23). Moreover, TNFα expression was recently shown to induce liver inflammation and promote tumorigenesis in mice with DIO and genetic obesity (36). TNFα, the first adipocytokine identified in adipose tissue, is known to contribute to inflammation-mediated tumor progression (21, 37, 38). To determine whether the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway is also involved in obesity-mediated mammary tumorigenesis, we harvested mammary tumors from these mice and subjected them to immunofluorescence staining. Immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 2A and B) showed that TNFα and VEGF protein levels in tumors were significantly higher in mice with DIO and genetic obesity than in control (lean) mice. We also determined via ELISA that circulating TNFα (Supplementary Fig. S2A and S2B) and VEGF (Supplementary Fig. S2C and S2D) levels in the blood were higher in mice with DIO and genetic obesity than in control (lean) mice. Moreover, we observed higher levels of phosphorylated IKKβ and phosphorylated S6, an indicator for mTOR activity, in obese mice than in control mice (Fig. 2A and B), indicating that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway was indeed activated in the tumor cells of obese mice. Together, these results suggested that TNFα plays an important role in obesity-mediated mammary tumorigenesis by activating the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Increased TNFα/IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF in mammary tumor of genetic and dietary obesity mice. Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of mammary tumors with TNFα, VEGF, phosphorylated IKKβ (S176/180) [pIKKβ (S176/180)], and phosphorylated S6 (S240/244) [pS6 (S240/244)] antibodies (right). A, mammary tumor in C57BL/6J female mice that were fed a HFD or normal diet. B, mammary tumor in genetic obese B6.V-Lepob/J (OB) mice that were fed normal chow diet. The relative fluorescence intensity from the images is shown on the right. The data represent the mean ± SD. ND, normal chow diet. *, P < 0.05.

Obesity mediates mammary tumorigenesis by increasing angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation

Our previous findings indicated that enhanced angiogenesis plays a central role in TNFα-induced breast tumor development by activating the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway. This activation resulted in VEGF expression in multiple tumor types and correlated with poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients (21). To characterize the role of TNFα-mediated VEGF expression in our obesity-mediated mammary tumor models, we further examined in vivo angiogenesis phenomena or cell proliferation via immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissue using CD31 antibody (a marker for endothelial cells). The vascular density of mammary tumors in obese mice (OB and HFD/DIO) was higher than that of mammary tumors in control (lean) mice (Fig. 3A). Likewise, using Ki67 as an indicator of cancer cell proliferation, we also found that the proportion of proliferating cancer cells was higher in mammary tumors in OB and HFD/DIO mice than in the tumors of control (lean) mice fed normal chow diet (Fig. 3B). These results suggested that obesity plays a role in promoting mammary tumorigenesis, at least in part, by enhancing tumor angiogenesis, which is in line with our previous studies that showed TNFα produced by adipose tissues increases of tumor angiogenesis (21, 36).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Increased tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation in mammary tumors in obese mice. Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of mammary tumor tissues: CD31 antibody as an indicator of tumor vascular density (red; A) and Ki67 antibody as an indicator of tumor cell proliferation (green; B). The relative fluorescence intensity from the images is shown below. The data represent the mean ± SD. ND, normal chow diet. *, P < 0.05.

Blocking the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway inhibits obesity-mediated tumorigenesis

The data shown here suggest that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway may play an important role in mammary tumor progression in obese mice. Thus, targeting this pathway may lead to new intervention strategies for obesity-mediated breast cancer. To determine whether inhibition of the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway reduces the development of mammary tumor in DIO mice, we first established mammary tumors in obese and control mice as described above and then administered inhibitors or antagonists of this specific pathway to obese and control (lean) mice after the tumor volume reached 3 to 5 mm in diameter. Interestingly, after treatment with aspirin (an IKKβ inhibitor), rapamycin (an mTOR inhibitor), or bevacizumab (a VEGF antagonist) for 2 weeks, a significant reduction in mammary tumor volume was observed in obese mice but not in control (lean) mice (left panels, Fig. 4A–C).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Inhibitors of the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway block obesity-mediated tumorigenesis. HFD-induced obesity mice and control (lean) mice with mammary tumors were prepared as described in Fig. 1 and then treated with or without aspirin (A), rapamycin (B), or bevacizumab (C). Tumor-bearing mice were administered aspirin at 120 mg/kg/d by subcutaneous injection; rapamycin at 5 mg/kg twice per week by intraperitoneal injection; and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg once per week by intravenous injection (10 mice/treatment group). Tumor volume was measured after 2 weeks of drug treatment (left). Treatment with these drugs significantly reduced tumor volume in the HFD group but not in the normal chow diet (control/lean) group. Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissues stained with indicated antibodies (middle). The relative fluorescence intensity from the images is shown on the right. The data represent the mean ± SD (10 mice per group). ND, normal chow diet. *, P < 0.05.

To validate that these drugs indeed blocked the specific pathway we proposed, tumor samples from the mice treated or untreated with the drugs were subjected to immunostaining with specific antibodies against the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway. The activity of IKKβ, mTOR, and VEGFR, as indicated by their phosphorylation status, was reduced in tumor-bearing obese mice that were treated with aspirin, rapamycin, and bevacizumab, respectively (Fig. 4, middle and right panels). These results supported our hypothesis that blocking the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway could inhibit obesity-mediated breast tumorigenesis.

TNFα-mediated signaling pathway promotes the development of mammary tumors in mice

The data above strongly support the notion that the TNFα-induced signaling pathway plays a critical role in mammary tumor cell proliferation in obese mice. Next, we sought to determine whether the TNFα-mediated signaling pathway also promotes mammary tumor initiation in obese mice. To address this question, we used MMTV-neu transgenic mice, which develop mammary tumors spontaneously at about age 6 to 12 months (28, 29). After the weaning stage, one group of MMTV-neu transgenic mice was fed an HFD, and the other group was fed a normal chow diet. We monitored tumor development and found that spontaneous development of mammary tumors was accelerated in the MMTV-neu transgenic mice group fed the HFD, compared with the group that was fed a normal chow diet (Fig. 5A), suggesting that obesity also promotes tumor initiation. Mice exhibited tumor formation from day 146 to day 207 (median = 159 days) and from day 181 to day 239 (median = 212 days) in the HFD and normal chow diet groups, respectively (P = 0.003). The expression of TNFα and VEGF, as well as phosphorylated IKKβ and phosphorylated S6, was significantly higher in mammary tumors of the HFD group than in the tumors of the normal chow diet group, thereby suggesting that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway is also activated in the spontaneously developing mammary tumors of MMTV-neu transgenic mice with HFD (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

TNFα-mediated signaling pathway promotes mammary tumor development. A, spontaneous mammary tumor development in MMTV-neu mice fed with either a HFD or normal diet. Each group contained 10 mice. The incidence of spontaneous tumor growth in MMTV-neu mice was based on tumors larger than 5 mm in diameter in the mammary gland. B, representative images of immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissues with the indicated antibodies. The relative fluorescence intensity from the images is shown on the right. The data represent the mean ± SD, (10 mice per group). ND, normal chow diet. *, P < 0.05.

Inhibition of the TNFα-mediated signaling pathway prevents the development of mammary tumor in mice

In a parallel experiment, after the weaning stage, the MMTV-neu transgenic mice were fed an HFD but treated with aspirin, rapamycin, or bevacizumab. We found that these IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway inhibitors delayed mammary tumors development in MMTV-neu transgenic mice that were fed an HFD. The mice in the HFD, HFD aspirin-treated, HFD rapamycin-treated, and HFD bevacizumab-treated groups developed tumors from days 146 to 207, days 185 to 199, days 185 to 227, and days 185 to 243, respectively. The median time for tumor formation in both rapamycin- and bevacizumab-treated obese mice was 199 days, and the median time for tumor formation in the HFD group without drug treatment was 159 days (Fig. 6A). In addition, immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissues also showed that phosphorylation of the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway was decreased in mammary tumors of the obese MMTV-neu mice that were treated with these drugs (Fig. 6B). Taken together, these results suggested that obesity promotes breast tumor initiation, at least in part, by the activation of the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Inhibition of TNFα-mediated signaling pathway prevents mammary tumor development. A, HFD-fed MMTV-neu mice were treated with drugs that inhibit the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway and spontaneous mammary tumor development was monitored. Mice were administered aspirin at 120 mg/kg/d by subcutaneous injection; rapamycin at 5 mg/kg twice per week by intraperitoneal injection; and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg once per week by intravenous injection. Each group contained 10 mice. The incidence of spontaneous tumor growth in MMTV-neu mice was based on tumors larger than 5 mm in diameter in the mammary gland. B, representative images of immunofluorescence staining of tumor tissues with the indicated antibodies. The relative fluorescence intensity from the images is shown on the right. The data represent the mean ± SD (10 mice per group); *, P < 0.05.

Discussion

In this study, we showed a novel molecular mechanism that provides a link between obesity and breast cancer in mouse models. We found that the expression of TNFα and VEGF, as well as the activation of IKKβ and mTOR, is specifically upregulated in tumors in obese mice. More importantly, multiple clinical drugs and preclinical agents that are already available to target the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway have been shown to effectively reduce obesity-mediated mammary tumor growth and tumor development.

The epidemiology data have shown that obesity primarily increases breast cancer risk after menopause and affects ER-positive breast cancer (2). Our results suggest that the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway plays a role in obesity-mediated tumor progression in both ER-positive and ER-negative mammary tumors, as evident from our estrogen receptor (ER)-positive EO771 mouse model and MMTV-neu transgenic mouse model, which spontaneously develop ER-negative mammary tumors (39). Thus, the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway might contribute to the ER pathway–dependent development and progression of breast cancer and should be further studied in human patient samples in future. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that factors or pathways other than those identified in this study are also involved in the obesity-mediated mammary tumors. For example, Morris and colleagues found that macrophages forming crown-like structures can release TNFα to further activate NF-κB transcription factor and increase aromatase levels in the mammary glands of obese mice and in obese breast cancer patients (40, 41). A monoclonal antibody (mAb) called infliximab, which targets TNFα, is approved for several autoimmune diseases. Although we have not included this in our assay to show a direct role of TNFα in our model as it has yet to be approved for breast cancer treatment, it would be of interest to determine the effect of infliximab in the future.

The identification of specific signaling pathways is important for the clinical application of therapeutic targets in obesity-mediated breast cancer development. In this study, we focused on the TNFα/IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway, which can be specifically targeted by multiple clinical drugs. Aspirin is an anti-inflammatory drug, and high-dose aspirin treatment can reverse obesity-induced insulin resistance through targeted inhibition of IKKβ (30). Rapamycin and its analogs such as everolimus (RAD-001) are immunosuppressant drugs used in organ transplantation but have also been used as anticancer drugs because they suppress cancer cell proliferation by blocking the mTOR signaling pathway (42). Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF mAb approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2004, has shown anticancer activity when used both alone and in combination with other drugs in several cancer types (43). We examined the effects of each of these drugs on the major targets of the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway (Supplementary Fig. S3). Interestingly, we found that when obese mice with mammary tumors were treated with these drugs, all of the specific target molecules in the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway were inhibited. This is somewhat expected as aspirin, a phytochemical derivative with typically broad activity, has recently been shown to also activate AMPK, which influences the mTOR activity (44, 45). Moreover, other studies have also reported the activation of IKKβ by VEGF via the Flk-1/Cbl/Akt signaling pathway. Therefore, IKKβ can be downregulated once VEGF is blocked by bevacizumab (46). Although pathways other than the one we proposed may play a role, our results provide a rationale for targeting the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF pathway in obesity-mediated mammary tumor development.

Because aspirin did not significantly inhibit obesity-mediated mammary tumor incidence compared with rapamycin and bevacizumab in the MMTV-neu mouse model (Fig. 6A), we further examined the effect of these drugs on inflammatory infiltration (CD45, leukocytes common antigen) induced by TNFα proinflammatory cytokine that is linked to tumor insurgence and tumor progression. We found that inflammatory infiltration was more obvious in mice fed an HFD than those fed a normal chow diet and can be decreased by aspirin, rapamycin, or bevacizumab treatment (Supplementary Fig. S4A), suggesting that inflammation is one key point linking these factors. It is possible that the Her2/neu-mediated signaling pathway can overcome the inhibition of the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway in the MMTV-neu model (47) and would be of interest to further investigate the detailed molecular mechanisms of each drug treatment in the future.

Recent preclinical and clinical reports have shown that aspirin can be used for both cancer therapy and cancer prevention (48, 49). Furthermore, epidemiologic evidence shows that aspirin can be used for adjuvant therapy in cancer patients (50). However, in our MMTV-neu obesity mouse model, aspirin did not show inhibitory effects of mammary tumor initiation compared with rapamycin and bevacizumab (Fig. 6A). Thus, in this particular mouse model (Her2-positive breast cancer), aspirin may not be a good cancer prevention drug, but may be useful for cancer prevention for other types of breast cancers (ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancers). Although clinical trials show that aspirin can reduce tumor incidence by 10% in all cancer types, we believe the benefit-to-risk ratio must be defined in different cancer types (51, 52) as side effects, including gastrointestinal bleeding, from long-term aspirin treatment have been reported (48, 53, 54).

With regard to the effect of angiogenesis on obesity, we did not find significant body weight loss in the aspirin/rapamycin/bevacizumab treatment group compared with the obese control group. However, antiangiogenesis approaches have been proposed as a method of limiting obesity, and treatment of obese mice with antiangiogenesis inhibitors has been shown to reduce obesity. Although the pathophysiologic connection between angiogenesis and adipogenesis is well recognized, so far, there is limited data from preclinical and clinical studies to address the weight loss research that focused on treating obesity with angiogenesis inhibitors. In addition, some studies have shown different results with different types of antiangiogenic inhibitors. For instance, vatalanib, a VEGFR TKI, showed antitumor activity and changes in body weight in a murine renal cell carcinoma model (55). In contrast, in db/db C57BL/6 mice, a 2-week treatment with an anti-VEGF mAb did not result in a significant change in their body weight (56). In the clinic, much less is known about the effect of VEGF TKI on body weight as only severe weight loss is reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event criteria. Important adverse events of angiogenesis inhibitors are anorexia, nausea, stomatitis, and diarrhea, and all these adverse events can cause weight loss. Thus, it is not clear for the actual effects of antiangiogenic inhibitors to cause weight loss. Moreover, edema and hypothyroidism, which are also side effects of angiogenesis inhibitors, can contribute to weight gain (57). Therefore, how antiangiogenesis treatment affects obesity and what kinds of antiangiogenic inhibitors work remain unclear.

TNFα-activated IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF signaling pathway has also been shown to play an important role in the development of human esophageal cancer (37). In addition, obese mice with PanO2 pancreatic cancer xenografts responded to the inhibitors targeting this pathway (unpublished data). Taken together, these findings suggest that this pathway could potentially serve as a therapeutic target for other obesity-related human cancers.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: C.-T. Chen, M.-C. Hung

Development of methodology: C.-T. Chen, Y. Du, H.-P. Kuo

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): C.-T. Chen, Y. Du, H.-P. Kuo, M.-C. Hung

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): C.-T. Chen, Y. Du, G.N. Hortobagyi, M.-C. Hung

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: C.-T. Chen, H. Yamaguchi, G.N. Hortobagyi, M.-C. Hung

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): C.-T. Chen, J.-M. Hsu, G.N. Hortobagyi

Study supervision: C.-T. Chen, J.-M. Hsu, M.-C. Hung

In Memoriam

We acknowledge Mrs. Serena Lin-Guo for her courageous fight against breast cancer.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (G.N. Hortobagyi and M.-C. Hung), the Breast Cancer SPORE grant (G.N. Hortobagyi and M.-C. Hung), the National Breast Cancer Foundation (M.-C. Hung), Patel Memorial Breast Cancer Research Fund (M.-C. Hung), Sister Institution Fund of China Medical University and Hospital and MD Anderson Cancer Center (M.-C. Hung), Cancer Research Center of Excellence (DOH101-TD-C-111-005, Taiwan; M.-C. Hung), Private University grant (NSC99-2632-B-039-001-MY3, Taiwan; M.-C. Hung), Program for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Frontier Research (NSC100-2321-B-039-002, Taiwan; M.C. Hung), International Research-Intensive Centers of Excellence in Taiwan (NSC101-2911-I-002-303, Taiwan; M.C. Hung), and the NIH of Health through MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant (CA16672).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. F.M. Sirotnak for providing the EO771 mammary adenocarcinoma cell line, Dr. Jennifer L. Hsu for critical reading of the manuscript, and Dr. Tamara K. Locke and Ms. Markeda L. Wade at Scientific Publications at MD Anderson Cancer Center for editing our manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received February 21, 2012.
  • Revision received June 26, 2012.
  • Accepted July 12, 2012.
  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Basen-Engquist K,
    2. Chang M
    . Obesity and cancer risk: recent review and evidence. Curr Oncol Rep 2011;13:71–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Calle EE,
    2. Kaaks R
    . Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:579–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Carmichael AR,
    2. Bates T
    . Obesity and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast 2004;13:85–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ronco AL,
    2. De Stefani E,
    3. Stoll M
    . Hormonal and metabolic modulation through nutrition: towards a primary prevention of breast cancer. Breast 2010;19:322–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kuhl H
    . Breast cancer risk in the WHI study: the problem of obesity. Maturitas 2005;51:83–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Beral V,
    2. Bull D,
    3. Doll R,
    4. Key T,
    5. Peto R,
    6. Reeves G
    . Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Lancet 1997;350:1047–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. McTiernan A,
    2. Irwin M,
    3. Vongruenigen V
    . Weight, physical activity, diet, and prognosis in breast and gynecologic cancers. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4074–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wei EK,
    2. Wolin KY,
    3. Colditz GA
    . Time course of risk factors in cancer etiology and progression. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4052–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hauner D,
    2. Janni W,
    3. Rack B,
    4. Hauner H
    . The effect of overweight and nutrition on prognosis in breast cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011;108:795–801.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Turner LB
    . A meta-analysis of fat intake, reproduction, and breast cancer risk: an evolutionary perspective. Am J Hum Biol 2011;23:601–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Carmichael AR
    . Obesity and prognosis of breast cancer. Obes Rev 2006;7:333–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Maruthur NM,
    2. Bolen S,
    3. Brancati FL,
    4. Clark JM
    . Obesity and mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:665–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vrieling A,
    2. Buck K,
    3. Kaaks R,
    4. Chang-Claude J
    . Adult weight gain in relation to breast cancer risk by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123:641–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Williams GP
    . The role of oestrogen in the pathogenesis of obesity, type 2 diabetes, breast cancer and prostate disease. Eur J Cancer Prev 2010;19:256–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Renehan AG,
    2. Frystyk J,
    3. Flyvbjerg A
    . Obesity and cancer risk: the role of the insulin-IGF axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2006;17:328–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Jarde T,
    2. Perrier S,
    3. Vasson MP,
    4. Caldefie-Chezet F
    . Molecular mechanisms of leptin and adiponectin in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:33–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Grossmann ME,
    2. Ray A,
    3. Nkhata KJ,
    4. Malakhov DA,
    5. Rogozina OP,
    6. Dogan S,
    7. et al.
    Obesity and breast cancer: status of leptin and adiponectin in pathological processes. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2010;29:641–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ray A,
    2. Cleary MP
    . Leptin as a potential therapeutic target for breast cancer prevention and treatment. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2010;14:443–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rose DP,
    2. Komninou D,
    3. Stephenson GD
    . Obesity, adipocytokines, and insulin resistance in breast cancer. Obes Rev 2004;5:153–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ghanim H,
    2. Aljada A,
    3. Hofmeyer D,
    4. Syed T,
    5. Mohanty P,
    6. Dandona P
    . Circulating mononuclear cells in the obese are in a proinflammatory state. Circulation 2004;110:1564–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lee DF,
    2. Kuo HP,
    3. Chen CT,
    4. Hsu JM,
    5. Chou CK,
    6. Wei Y,
    7. et al.
    IKK beta suppression of TSC1 links inflammation and tumor angiogenesis via the mTOR pathway. Cell 2007;130:440–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Maccio A,
    2. Madeddu C,
    3. Mantovani G
    . Adipose tissue as target organ in the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer: new therapeutic perspectives. Obes Rev 2009;10:660–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lee DF,
    2. Kuo HP,
    3. Chen CT,
    4. Wei Y,
    5. Chou CK,
    6. Hung JY,
    7. et al.
    IKKbeta suppression of TSC1 function links the mTOR pathway with insulin resistance. Int J Mol Med 2008;22:633–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Um SH,
    2. Frigerio F,
    3. Watanabe M,
    4. Picard F,
    5. Joaquin M,
    6. Sticker M,
    7. et al.
    Absence of S6K1 protects against age- and diet-induced obesity while enhancing insulin sensitivity. Nature 2004;431:200–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. West DB,
    2. Waguespack J,
    3. McCollister S
    . Dietary obesity in the mouse: interaction of strain with diet composition. Am J Physiol 1995;268:R658–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Friedman JM,
    2. Leibel RL,
    3. Siegel DS,
    4. Walsh J,
    5. Bahary N
    . Molecular mapping of the mouse ob mutation. Genomics 1991;11:1054–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Pelleymounter MA,
    2. Cullen MJ,
    3. Baker MB,
    4. Hecht R,
    5. Winters D,
    6. Boone T,
    7. et al.
    Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science 1995;269:540–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Liu JC,
    2. Deng T,
    3. Lehal RS,
    4. Kim J,
    5. Zacksenhaus E
    . Identification of tumorsphere- and tumor-initiating cells in HER2/Neu-induced mammary tumors. Cancer Res 2007;67:8671–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Andrechek ER,
    2. Muller WJ
    . Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: tyrosine kinase-mediated signal transduction in transgenic mouse models of human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2000;2:211–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Yuan M,
    2. Konstantopoulos N,
    3. Lee J,
    4. Hansen L,
    5. Li ZW,
    6. Karin M,
    7. et al.
    Reversal of obesity- and diet-induced insulin resistance with salicylates or targeted disruption of Ikkbeta. Science 2001;293:1673–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Xing D,
    2. Orsulic S
    . A genetically defined mouse ovarian carcinoma model for the molecular characterization of pathway-targeted therapy and tumor resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:6936–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Dings RP,
    2. Loren M,
    3. Heun H,
    4. McNiel E,
    5. Griffioen AW,
    6. Mayo KH,
    7. et al.
    Scheduling of radiation with angiogenesis inhibitors anginex and Avastin improves therapeutic outcome via vessel normalization. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:3395–402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cheng X,
    2. Xia W,
    3. Yang JY,
    4. Hsu JL,
    5. Lang JY,
    6. Chou CK,
    7. et al.
    Activation of murine double minute 2 by Akt in mammary epithelium delays mammary involution and accelerates mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2010;70:7684–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Dai C,
    2. Whitesell L,
    3. Rogers AB,
    4. Lindquist S
    . Heat shock factor 1 is a powerful multifaceted modifier of carcinogenesis. Cell 2007;130:1005–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Dirat B,
    2. Bochet L,
    3. Escourrou G,
    4. Valet P,
    5. Muller C
    . Unraveling the obesity and breast cancer links: a role for cancer-associated adipocytes? Endocr Dev 2010;19:45–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Park EJ,
    2. Lee JH,
    3. Yu GY,
    4. He G,
    5. Ali SR,
    6. Holzer RG,
    7. et al.
    Dietary and genetic obesity promote liver inflammation and tumorigenesis by enhancing IL-6 and TNF expression. Cell 2010;140:197–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Yen CJ,
    2. Izzo JG,
    3. Lee DF,
    4. Guha S,
    5. Wei Y,
    6. Wu TT,
    7. et al.
    Bile acid exposure up-regulates tuberous sclerosis complex 1/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in Barrett's-associated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2008;68:2632–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Ashkenazi A
    . Targeting death and decoy receptors of the tumour-necrosis factor superfamily. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:420–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Cleary MP,
    2. Grossmann ME,
    3. Ray A
    . Effect of obesity on breast cancer development. Vet Pathol 2010;47:202–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Morris PG,
    2. Hudis CA,
    3. Giri D,
    4. Morrow M,
    5. Falcone DJ,
    6. Zhou XK,
    7. et al.
    Inflammation and increased aromatase expression occur in the breast tissue of obese women with breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:1021–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Subbaramaiah K,
    2. Howe LR,
    3. Bhardwaj P,
    4. Du B,
    5. Gravaghi C,
    6. Yantiss RK,
    7. et al.
    Obesity is associated with inflammation and elevated aromatase expression in the mouse mammary gland. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:329–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Buck E,
    2. Eyzaguirre A,
    3. Brown E,
    4. Petti F,
    5. McCormack S,
    6. Haley JD,
    7. et al.
    Rapamycin synergizes with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in non-small-cell lung, pancreatic, colon, and breast tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5:2676–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Banerjee S,
    2. Dowsett M,
    3. Ashworth A,
    4. Martin LA
    . Mechanisms of disease: angiogenesis and the management of breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007;4:536–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Hawley SA,
    2. Fullerton MD,
    3. Ross FA,
    4. Schertzer JD,
    5. Chevtzoff C,
    6. Walker KJ,
    7. et al.
    The ancient drug salicylate directly activates AMP-activated protein kinase. Science 2012;336:918–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Shaw RJ,
    2. Cantley LC
    . Cell biology. Ancient sensor for ancient drug. Science 2012;336:813–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Chang J,
    3. Li YC,
    4. Li YS,
    5. Shyy JY,
    6. Chien S
    . Shear stress and VEGF activate IKK via the Flk-1/Cbl/Akt signaling pathway. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;286:H685–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Zhou BP,
    2. Hu MC,
    3. Miller SA,
    4. Yu Z,
    5. Xia W,
    6. Lin SY,
    7. et al.
    HER-2/neu blocks tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis via the Akt/NF-kappaB pathway. J Biol Chem 2000;275:8027–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Force USPST
    . Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:396–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Fowkes FG,
    3. Belch JF,
    4. Ogawa H,
    5. Warlow CP,
    6. Meade TW
    . Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2011;377:31–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Langley RE,
    2. Burdett S,
    3. Tierney JF,
    4. Cafferty F,
    5. Parmar MK,
    6. Venning G
    . Aspirin and cancer: has aspirin been overlooked as an adjuvant therapy? Br J Cancer 2011;105:1107–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Thun MJ,
    2. Jacobs EJ,
    3. Patrono C
    . The role of aspirin in cancer prevention. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9:259–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Avivi D,
    2. Moshkowitz M,
    3. Detering E,
    4. Arber N
    . The role of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2012;16 Suppl 1:S51–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Graham I,
    2. Atar D,
    3. Borch-Johnsen K,
    4. Boysen G,
    5. Burell G,
    6. Cifkova R,
    7. et al.
    European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007;14 Suppl 2:S1–113.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    1. Graham I,
    2. Atar D,
    3. Borch-Johnsen K,
    4. Boysen G,
    5. Burell G,
    6. Cifkova R,
    7. et al.
    European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Atherosclerosis 2007;194:1–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Drevs J,
    2. Hofmann I,
    3. Hugenschmidt H,
    4. Wittig C,
    5. Madjar H,
    6. Muller M,
    7. et al.
    Effects of PTK787/ZK 222584, a specific inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, on primary tumor, metastasis, vessel density, and blood flow in a murine renal cell carcinoma model. Cancer Res 2000;60:4819–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Nishimura S,
    2. Manabe I,
    3. Nagasaki M,
    4. Hosoya Y,
    5. Yamashita H,
    6. Fujita H,
    7. et al.
    Adipogenesis in obesity requires close interplay between differentiating adipocytes, stromal cells, and blood vessels. Diabetes 2007;56:1517–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Eskens FA,
    2. Verweij J
    . The clinical toxicity profile of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) targeting angiogenesis inhibitors; a review. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:3127–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 11 (10)
October 2012
Volume 11, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Targeting the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF Signaling Pathway as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Obesity-Related Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Targeting the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF Signaling Pathway as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Obesity-Related Breast Cancer
Chun-Te Chen, Yi Du, Hirohito Yamaguchi, Jung-Mao Hsu, Hsu-Ping Kuo, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi and Mien-Chie Hung
Mol Cancer Ther October 1 2012 (11) (10) 2212-2221; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0180

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Targeting the IKKβ/mTOR/VEGF Signaling Pathway as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Obesity-Related Breast Cancer
Chun-Te Chen, Yi Du, Hirohito Yamaguchi, Jung-Mao Hsu, Hsu-Ping Kuo, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi and Mien-Chie Hung
Mol Cancer Ther October 1 2012 (11) (10) 2212-2221; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0180
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • In Memoriam
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PSMA-Specific BiTE Antibody
  • BiKEs and TriKEs Enhance NK Cell Effector Function
  • Ganetespib Activity in KRAS-Mutant NSCLCs
Show more Preclinical Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement