Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Therapeutic Discovery

Cell Intrinsic Role of COX-2 in Pancreatic Cancer Development

Reginald Hill, Yunfeng Li, Linh M. Tran, Sarah Dry, Joseph Hargan Calvopina, Alejandro Garcia, Christine Kim, Ying Wang, Timothy R. Donahue, Harvey R. Herschman and Hong Wu
Reginald Hill
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunfeng Li
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linh M. Tran
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Dry
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Hargan Calvopina
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alejandro Garcia
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Kim
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Wang
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy R. Donahue
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harvey R. Herschman
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Wu
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Departments of 1Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and 2Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3Institute for Molecular Medicine 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of 5Surgeryand 6Biological Chemistry, 7Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0342 Published October 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

COX-2 is upregulated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). However, how COX-2 promotes PDAC development is unclear. While previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of COX-2 inhibition via the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in PDAC models, none have addressed the cell intrinsic versus microenvironment roles of COX-2 in modulating PDAC initiation and progression. We tested the cell intrinsic role of COX-2 in PDAC progression using both loss-of-function and gain-of-function approaches. Cox-2 deletion in Pdx1+ pancreatic progenitor cells significantly delays the development of PDAC in mice with K-ras activation and Pten haploinsufficiency. Conversely, COX-2 overexpression promotes early onset and progression of PDAC in the K-ras mouse model. Loss of PTEN function is a critical factor in determining lethal PDAC onset and overall survival. Mechanistically, COX-2 overexpression increases p-AKT levels in the precursor lesions of Pdx1+; K-rasG12D/+; Ptenlox/+ mice in the absence of Pten LOH. In contrast, Cox-2 deletion in the same setting diminishes p-AKT levels and delays cancer progression. These data suggest an important cell intrinsic role for COX-2 in tumor initiation and progression through activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. PDAC that is independent of intrinsic COX-2 expression eventually develops with decreased FKBP5 and increased GRP78 expression, two alternate pathways leading to AKT activation. Together, these results support a cell intrinsic role for COX-2 in PDAC development and suggest that while anti-COX-2 therapy may delay the development and progression of PDAC, mechanisms known to increase chemoresistance through AKT activation must also be overcome. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(10); 2127–37. ©2012 AACR.

Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, has a 5-year survival rate of 4% (1). The poor outcome of PDAC has been attributed to late detection, the aggressive nature of the disease, and poor response to local and systemic therapies. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms that lead to PDAC initiation, progression, and chemoresistance would help the development of more effective treatment regimens.

COX, also known as prostaglandin (PG) endoperoxide synthases, are enzymes essential in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins. COXs exist as 2 isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2 (2). COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most mammalian tissues and is responsible for mediating various normal physiologic processes. COX-2, on the other hand, is low or undetectable in most normal tissues, but is induced in response to a wide range of stimuli in many cell types including epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and macrophages (3).

COX-2 levels are often elevated in lung, breast, esophageal, bladder, prostate, and pancreatic cancers (4). Substantial data suggest that COX-2 expression is not simply a by-product, but is a causal factor of tumor development. COX-2 overexpression in transgenic mice led to breast cancer formation, a phenotype greatly reduced by the use of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (ref. 5; Fig. 1). Likewise, tumor growth in pancreatic cancers initiated by either COX-2 overexpression (6, 7) or mutant K-ras activation (8), and prostate cancers initiated by the SV40 large T antigen (9), was significantly reduced by celecoxib treatment.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Chemical structure of celecoxib.

Importantly, celecoxib significantly reduced premalignant colon polyp formation in patients at risk for colon cancer (10). However, the addition of celecoxib to gemcitabine therapy, the current standard-of-care for treatment of PDAC did not show significant improvement in the survival of patients with metastatic disease (11), suggesting that the efficacy of celecoxib may be cancer- or cancer stage–dependent.

We previously showed that K-ras activation and Pten haploinsufficiency cooperate to activate p-AKT in precancerous lesions and accelerate tumor development in our mouse model of PDAC (12), suggesting that PTEN loss-of-function is a critical factor for determining the onset of lethal tumor development. Although PTEN mutation is not commonly found in human PDAC, loss of at least one copy of PTEN or gain/amplification of AKT2 has been reported in 32.8% of the PDAC xenografts derived from primary patient samples (13). Moreover, elevated p-AKT was observed in 68.5% of PDAC tissue microarray samples (13), suggesting that mechanisms other than PTEN deletion or AKT2 gain/amplification contribute to the elevated p-AKT levels seen in PDAC. In addition, our recent integrative, survival-based, molecular profiling of human PDAC provided multiple lines of correlative data showing that dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway is linked to clinical disease progression (14). Taken together, these data provide strong rationale for further studies designed to identify mechanisms through which the PI3K/AKT pathway is regulated in PDAC development in the absence of Pten LOH or mutation. We hypothesized that COX-2 expression, which suppresses PTEN activity in cell culture (15), could play a significant role in tumor development through activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. To investigate this hypothesis, we conditionally either overexpressed or deleted Cox-2 in the K-ras/Pten mouse model to explore the role of COX-2 in regulating PI3K/AKT pathway activation during tumorigenesis.

While it is clear that COX-2 plays an enhancing and/or causal role in the progression of many types of cancer, the role(s) of COX-2 expression in the initiated epithelial cell versus in cells within the tumor microenvironment are unclear. We recently showed that Cox-2 deletion in myeloid and endothelial cells, but not in epithelial cells, exacerbates murine colitis (16). These studies point toward the importance of elucidating the cell intrinsic versus cell extrinsic role of COX-2 in tumorigenesis. To address this issue in pancreatic tumorigenesis, we conditionally deleted or overexpressed Cox-2 in the Pdx1+ pancreatic progenitor cells.

Materials and Methods

Mouse strains

The generation of conditional Cox-2 overexpression (Cox-2 COE) and conditional knockout (Cox-2 KO) mice has been reported previously (17, 18). To conditionally overexpress COX-2 in the pancreas, we crossed the Pdx1-Cre+ line to the floxed Cox-2 COE transgenic line (17). Primers designed to detect the Cox-2 transgenic cassette were used for genotyping (17). The Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE line was further crossed to Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D;Ptenlox/+ mice (12) to produce Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE animals and littermate controls on a mixed C57/BL/6,129/BALB/c background. Likewise, Cox-2 KO mice (18) were used to produce Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2KO and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2KO animals. All studies were conducted under the regulation of the Division of Laboratory Animal Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA; Los Angeles, CA).

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Antigen retrieval was conducted by heating the slides at 95°C in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) for 15 minutes before staining. The following primary antibodies were used: phospho-AKT(Ser473) (Cell Signaling; 1:50), Cytokeratin 19 (ab15463, Abcam; 1:100), COX-2 (SP21; Thermo Scientific, ready-to-use), GRP78 (11587-1AP, ProteinTech Group; 1:50), and FKBP5 (14155-1-AP, ProteinTech Group, 1:50). Blocking of GRP78 expression with an excess of synthetic GRP78 peptide (1084, Cell Signaling) was done by adding twice the volume of peptide as volume of antibody used for primary incubation. Only unidentifiable human tumor samples, collected by Tissue Procurement Core Laboratory at the UCLA under the approval of the UCLA Institutional Review Board, were used in this study. All pathology was graded according to the consensus criteria established at the 2004 Penn Workshop (19).

Laser-capture microdissection and LOH analysis

Laser-capture microdissection of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections was conducted using a Leica LMD7000. Tissue (100,000 μm2) from acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) or PDACs in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2KO mice were collected and extraction was done following protocols from QiaAMP DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen). Four-microliter aliquots of DNA were used for the PCR analysis. PCR was conducted for detection of wild-type, floxed, and recombined alleles of Pten using previously described primers (12).

Statistical analysis

Array analysis was done by the UCLA Clinical Microarray Core on the Affymetrix Mouse 430 2.0 array. Microarray data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE38988). Data normalization, filtering, and hierarchical clustering were done using dChip software. For each gene, its expression in each genotype group was represented by the geometric average of the biologic replicated samples (n = 4). The log ratio between a pair of 2 genotypes was then calculated. The error bar represents ±SEM. Animal survival was determined by the Kaplan–Meier survival method. P < 0.001, log-rank test, for each pairwise combination.

Results

Targeted Cox-2 deletion delays tumor onset in the K-ras/Pten PDAC model

Increased COX-2 expression is observed in chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanIN), and PDACs (20). To address the effect of cell intrinsic loss of COX-2 activity on tumor formation, we genetically eliminated Cox-2 by crossing the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ PDAC model (12) to mice carrying a floxed, conditional Cox-2 deletion allele (Cox-2lox/lox; ref. 18). Pdx1+ pancreatic progenitor cells can give rise to endocrine, exocrine, and ductal tissue, but not to cells in the microenvironment, such as macrophages, or cells associated with blood vessels (21). Because conditional K-ras activation, Pten deletion, and Cox-2 deletions are all dependent on Cre activity driven by the Pdx1 promoter in these mice, Cox-2 will be deleted in the same cells in which mutant K-rasG12D activation and Pten deletion take place.

We first examined how Cox-2 deletion affected the survival of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox mice, which succumb to tumor burden by 3 weeks of age (ref. 12; Fig. 2A; left, green line). Removal of endogenous COX-2 expression in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice extended the median survival time to 35 days (Fig. 2A; left, brown line).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Targeted Cox-2 deletion causes delayed tumor onset and increased life expectancy in the Pdx1-Cre;K-ras; Pten mouse model. A, Kaplan–Meier analysis comparison of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice. B, histology of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice. C, histology and COX-2 immunohistochemistry or double immunofluorescence [cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), COX-2], as indicated, on tumors of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox (enlarged version of B) and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice. Scale bars, 50 μm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

At 2 weeks of age, Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox mice developed PDAC (Fig. 2B, top). In contrast, removal of intrinsic COX-2 activity in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice resulted in a predominantly normal pancreas parenchyma (Fig. 2B, bottom). Although lesions in the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice appeared much later once the tumors developed the phenotypes resembled those of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox mice (Fig. 2C, left).

To confirm that Cox-2 is indeed deleted in tumors from Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice, we evaluated COX-2 expression by immunohistochemistry and double immunofluorescence analyses. Compared with the robust COX-2 staining observed in cytokeratin-19 positive (CK19+) neoplastic cells of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox mice (Fig. 2C, red arrow, top), no COX-2 expression can be detected in tumors from Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/lox;Cox-2lox/lox mice (Fig. 2C, red arrow, bottom) except CK19− cells in the microenvironment (Fig. 2C, green arrow, bottom). These observations suggest that, although genetic deletion of Cox-2 in the Pdx1+ pancreatic progenitor cells is not sufficient to fully abrogate tumorigenesis caused by alterations of the RAS/RAF/MAPK and PTEN/PI3K pathways, there is an important cell intrinsic role for COX-2 in pancreatic tumorigenesis; without intrinsic COX-2 expression, PDAC development is significantly delayed.

COX-2 overexpression alone is insufficient to promote PDAC development

Having established that loss of cell intrinsic COX-2 expression delays PDAC development, we next sought to determine whether cell intrinsic COX-2 overexpression alone had an effect on PDAC development. To examine this question, we crossed mice carrying a conditional Cox-2 overexpression allele (Cox-2COE; ref. 17) with the Pdx1-Cre+ line (22) to generate Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice.

Examination of H&E-stained sections of pancreata from Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice revealed structures that have the appearance of ADM, a preneoplastic ductal structure that emerges from acinar cells (Fig. 3A, red arrow) and low-grade mPanIN lesions (data not shown) in 58% and 42% of mice analyzed, respectively, beginning at 9 months (Fig. 3B). However, despite the presence of these early lesions, the life span of Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice (red line) was not altered when compared with that of wild-type (WT) littermate controls (Fig. 3C; black line), and no further progression could be detected in the Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice up to 16 months of age, establishing that intrinsic COX-2 overexpression alone in Pdx1-expressing cells of the pancreas is not sufficient to induce PDAC development.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Pdx1-Cre+–driven expression of COX-2 alone does not alter survival. A, histology of wild-type (WT) and Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, quantification of lesion development in Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE and wild-type mice. ND, not detected. C, Kaplan–Meier survival curve of Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice compared with littermate controls.

COX-2 overexpression promotes earlier onset of PDAC development and reduces survival of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+mice

Consistent with our finding that COX-2 overexpression alone is not sufficient to promote PDAC development, Guerra and colleagues (23) showed that injury-induced pancreatitis, in which Cox-2 overexpression plays an essential role, cannot cause PDAC unless a K-ras activation mutation is present. Given this precedent, we tested whether intrinsic COX-2 overexpression would accelerate tumorigenesis in a mouse model capable of developing PDACs.

Mice expressing K-rasG12D from its endogenous locus generate PDACs only after a prolonged latency (22), unless coupled with other genetic alterations commonly found in human PDAC, including loss of Ink4a/Arf (24), TGF-β receptor type 2 (Tgfbr2; ref. 25), Smad4 (26), mutation in p53 (27), or haploinsufficiency for Pten (12). COX-2 overexpression leads to significant reduction of median survival time in the Pdx1Cre+;K-rasG12D mice from 525 to 410 days (Fig. 4A, compare black and green lines).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

COX-2 overexpression in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice causes decreased survival and earlier lesion onset. A, Kaplan–Meier survival curves of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE, Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+, Pdx1-Cre+; K-rasG12D/+;Cox-2COE, and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+ mice. B, quantification of mPanIN, ADM, and PDAC development in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Cox-2COE mice by H&E examination. ND, not detected. C, histology of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice at 2 months of age. Scale bar, 50μm.

When one allele of Pten was removed from the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+ mice, we observed a substantial reduction in the overall survival in the Pdx1-Cre+; K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice (Fig. 4A, blue line). Of note, the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice have similar median survival times (Fig. 4A, blue and red line, respectively). This genetic evidence suggests that although COX-2 overexpression can collaborate with RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway activation, the biologic effects of COX-2 overexpression may overlap with PI3K/AKT activation in promoting PDAC development.

To further investigate the effects of COX-2 overexpression and RAS/RAF/MAPK and PI3K pathway activations, we examined the pancreata of each model between the age of 1 and 3 months (n = 12 for each cohort), and scored the presence of ADMs, mPanINs, or PDACs. As summarized in Fig. 4B, Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice developed a similar spectrum of lesions. Although Cox-2 overexpression had no significant impact on the incidence of early ADM and mPanIN1A lesions, it promoted the progression of these early lesions as evidenced by the larger and higher grade lesions found in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice when compared with age- and genetically background-matched Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice (Figs. 4B and C). Only 3 of 12 Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice, compared with 10 of 12 Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice developed mPanIN2-3s during this time frame. Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice also displayed an increased incidence of invasive PDACs as quantified in Fig. 4B and shown in the lower panel of Fig. 4C. The fact that the early progression observed histopathologically does not seem to have a major impact on the overall survival of the 2 cohorts suggests that the kinetics of disease progression from the early lesions to lethal disease may not be linear because of the timing and nature of secondary mutations acquired by localized lesions in each cohort. Because metastatic incidences are rare in both cohorts (<5%), it is difficult to quantitatively compare the rates and onset of these lesions.

AKT activation is associated with COX-2–mediated tumor progression

Because Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice have a similar median survival time, we reasoned that COX-2 overexpression may functionally mimic Pten LOH, an event critical for PDAC progression in the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ model (12). To test this hypothesis, we assessed both the Pten genomic and functional status in ADM and PDAC lesions in the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice. PTEN functional status was determined by p-AKT immunohistochemical analysis, and Pten genomic status was investigated by genomic PCR, using laser-captured lesion tissues. AKT is significantly activated in the ADM lesions of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice, but not in similar lesions of either Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ (Hill and colleagues 2010; and data not shown) or Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice (Fig. 5A; comparing left and right). In contrast, PDAC lesions from COX-2 overexpressing and Cox-2 deleted mice have comparably enhanced p-AKT staining, further supporting our hypothesis that AKT activation is a limiting step in ADM to PDAC progression (12).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

p-AKT expression is associated with COX-2–mediated tumor acceleration. A, p-AKT immunochemistry in Pdx1-Cre+; K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. B, PCR analysis of DNA extracted from laser-captured samples was conducted on ADMs and PDACs of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice to detect PCR products from the wild-type Pten allele (WT allele), the floxed Pten allele (lox allele), and the deleted Pten allele (del band).

We then extracted genomic DNA from laser-captured ADM and PDAC lesions from cohorts of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice (n = 4) and conducted PCR analysis. The WT Pten allele (Fig. 5B; in red) is maintained at near-equal molar ratio to the Pten-deleted allele (Fig. 5B; in blue) in both precancer (ADM) and cancer (PDAC) lesions, indicating that majority of cells in these lesions did not acquire Pten LOH. This result suggests that COX-2 overexpression, together with Pten haploinsufficiency, promotes AKT activation—a necessary step for the progression of precursor lesions to PDAC (12). The presence of elevated COX-2 activity, therefore, removes the selective pressure for Pten LOH that is observed in the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ model (15).

Upregulated GRP78 expression correlates with p-AKT activation in the precursor lesions

Upregulation of GRP78, a member of the Hsp70 protein family, is associated with poor prognosis of a number of human cancers (28, 29). While GRP78 is known to be expressed in the cytoplasm, the recent discovery of GRP78 on the cell surface and its role in activating the AKT (28, 29) prompted us to investigate whether GRP78 expression is involved in initiation and progression in human PDAC. While no GRP78 expression was observed in the ducts of wild-type murine samples (Supplementary Fig. S1A, green arrow in left), GRP78 expression is significantly upregulated in the ductal structures of human ADM and PDAC lesions (Fig. 6A, top, high power magnification; Supplementary Fig. S1A, right, low power magnification). Importantly, GRP78 is strongly expressed in both the cytoplasm and the membranes of these human lesions (Fig. 6A, top).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Increased membrane-associated GRP78 expression is associated with COX-2–mediated tumor acceleration and correlates with p-AKT expression. A, representative immunohistochemistry for GRP78 on ADMs and PDACs from human pancreatic tumor samples and from Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox tumors. B, coimmunofluorescence for GRP78 and p-AKT in PDAC of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice (low power, left and magnified inset of white outlined area, right). Scale bars, 50 μm.

We then analyzed GRP78 expression in our murine models. Similar to the human disease, both ADM and PDAC lesions in the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice have strongly upregulated GRP78 expression, especially its membrane-associated form (Fig. 6A, middle), corresponding to the AKT activation (Fig. 5A, I and II panel from left). The specificity of this staining was confirmed by showing that excess GRP78 peptide can block labeling with this antibody (Supplemental Fig. S1B). In contrast, only low cytosolic GRP78 expression (Fig. 6A, bottom left) and nearly undetectable AKT activation (Fig. 5A, 3rd panel from left) can be observed in the ADM lesions from mice with the targeted Cox-2 deletion.

These data suggest that COX-2 overexpression may lead to upregulated expression of membrane-associated GRP78 and to subsequent AKT activation. However, even in the absence of epithelial COX-2 expression, PDAC lesions in the Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice also showed upregulated GRP78 expression (bottom right of Fig. 6A; Supplementary Fig. S1B), which colocalizes with enhanced p-AKT in the membrane (Fig. 6B), suggesting that GRP78 and AKT can be upregulated and activated in a COX-2–independent manner as the disease progresses.

Decreased FK506-binding protein 5 (FKBP5) negative feedback leads to enhanced AKT activation in PDAC of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice

Although Cox-2 conditional deletion led to increased median survival of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice (65 days; data not shown), all Cox-2–deleted animals ultimately succumbed to aggressive PDAC without Pten LOH (Fig. 5A), suggesting that resistance to COX-2–directed therapy is likely to occur in patients.

Decreased expression of scaffold protein FKBP5 has been identified as one of the mechanisms that enhances AKT activity and causes PDAC chemoresistance (30). FKBP5, by acting as a scaffolding protein for AKT and PH domain and leucine-rich repeat protein phosphatase 1 (PHLPP), promotes PHLPP dephosphorylation of AKT at amino acid S473 (31), thereby suppressing AKT activity (30, 32). We examined the expression level of FKPB5 mRNA and found that FKBP5 is downregulated significantly in PDACs of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice (Fig. 7A; P = 0.01; 2-tailed t test, determined as the Log2 ratio of the FKBP5 expression of knockout [Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox over Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+] and overexpressed [Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE over Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+]).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Decreased FKBP5 negative feedback leads to enhanced AKT activation in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice. A, FKBP5 mRNA expression in PDACs of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox (KO, n = 4) and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Pten lox/+;Cox-2COE (OE, n = 4) mice. B, representative immunohistochemical analyses for FKBP5 in PDACs in the 3 mutant murine lines. C, immunohisto-chemisty for p-AKT and FKBP5 in consecutive sections in a PDAC from a Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mouse. Scale bars, 50μm. D, model of COX-2–mediated activation of p-AKT in tumors with and without COX-2 expression. Left, Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice have earlier PDAC onset because early p-AKT activation, possibly mediated by increased GRP78 expression, cooperates with Pten haploinsufficiency to initiate tumorigenesis. Right, p-AKT activation in tumors of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice could be the result of loss of FKBP5-regulated AKT suppression, which is reduced in the absence of COX-2 expression.

Immunohistochemical analysis revealed strong FKBP5 staining in PDACs of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice, whereas FKBP5 expression was reduced to almost undetectable levels in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, enhanced membrane-associated p-AKT correlates with reduced FKBP5 staining in PDACs of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice (Fig. 7C, region indicated by green arrow, Supplementary Fig. S2). These results suggest that, in the absence of Pten LOH, downregulation of FKBP5 could cause activation of AKT in PDAC with Cox-2 deletion or, in a clinical context, as a result of celecoxib treatment, leading to chemoresistance.

Discussion

Using both loss- and gain-of-function genetic approaches, our study establishes a cell intrinsic role for COX-2 in the onset and progression of PDAC. COX-2 overexpression cooperates with Pten haploinsufficiency to activate AKT, a gate-keeping event in PDAC progression, leading to accelerated tumor development. Mechanistically, AKT activation may occur as a result of increased membrane-associated GRP78 expression, induced as a consequence of enhanced COX-2 signaling (Fig. 7D, left). Alternatively, AKT can be activated by decreased FKBP5-PHLPp-AKT negative feedback circuitry associated with Cox-2 abrogation (Fig. 7D, right) or, perhaps, in response to NSAID or celecoxib treatment. Our findings suggest that, while anti-COX-2 therapies may delay PDAC onset and progression, tumors undergoing NSAID or celecoxib treatment may acquire changes that lead to AKT activation and therapeutic resistance. These alternate mechanisms that lead to AKT-mediated resistance must also be overcome to achieve therapeutic efficacy (33–35).

Cell intrinsic role for COX-2 in pancreatic tumor development

Previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of COX-2 inhibition, via the use of NSAIDs or celecoxib treatment, in PDAC models (6–8). However, there are no previous studies that have been able to discriminate between the effect of COX-2 inhibition in both the tumor cells and the microenvironment, and COX-2 inhibition in only the tumor cells. The murine models we have generated provided an opportunity to elucidate the cell intrinsic function of COX-2 in PDAC development.

Unlike previous studies, which showed that cytokeratin-5–driven expression of COX-2 led to the development of PDAC, (6), we observed that COX-2 expression in Pdx1+ progenitor cells alone is not sufficient for the development of PDAC in Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice. This result raises the question of what is preventing tumor development in Pdx1-Cre+;Cox-2COE mice or in mice with injury-induced pancreatitis, where COX-2 plays a critical role in subsequent tumor development (23). Recent studies indicate K-ras mutation is essential for the progression of premalignant lesions to PDAC in mice with injury-induced pancreatitis (23, 36). Consistent with these observations, our genetic study suggests that the cross-talk between COX-2 and RAS/MAPK signaling pathway is essential in promoting PDAC development. Furthermore, the median survival of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Cox-2COE mice was significantly longer than that of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice, establishing the importance of PTEN pathway function in determining both PDAC progression and overall survival. The similar survival trends of Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE and Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+ mice also support the hypothesis that the effects of COX-2 expression overlap with the PI3K/AKT pathway and suggest that COX-2 is a key modulator of PI3K/AKT activation in pancreatic tumorigenesis, without the need for Pten loss of heterozygosity.

The PTEN pathway and PDAC progression

Tumors in the K-ras;Pten mice recapitulate the pathologic features of human PDACs. Moreover, these mice model the loss of PTEN function, which is now recognized as a frequent, major contributor in human PDAC progression. While the loss of both alleles of PTEN is infrequent in PDAC, elevated p-AKT was frequently observed in the PDAC tissue microarray samples (13), suggesting that mechanisms other than PTEN deletion contribute to the elevated p-AKT levels seen in PDAC. Elucidating these mechanisms is of critical importance, as our recent work has shown that dysregulated PI3K/AKT signaling is significantly associated with distinct pancreatic cancer patient subgroups with more aggressive disease progression (14). The identification of the driver(s) for PI3K/AKT pathway expression, and what the downstream effects of this PI3K/AKT expression are, should aid the development of more effective therapies. Our previous work shows that Pten heterozygozity leads to earlier precursor lesion development, which is associated with increased cell proliferation (12). Moreover, our findings suggest 2 AKT-activating mechanisms, both related to COX-2 expression, may occur during the development of PDAC.

p-AKT activation in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2COE mice is associated with an increase in membrane-bound GRP78, which was diminished upon Cox-2 deletion, in precursor lesions. Increased GRP78 expression has recently been identified as a critical factor in protecting cells from cell death in response to cellular insults, including inflammation and pancreatitis (37). It seems likely that increased COX-2 expression regulates GRP78 activity. The GRP78 promoter contains a cAMP responsive element (38). COX-2 signaling via epithelial cell EP receptors may activate GRP78 via the cAMP/PKA pathway (39).

The high level of GRP78 we observed in tumors in our in vivo models raises the question of whether GRP78 is essential for pancreatic tumor progression. Targeted knockout of Grp78 in the prostate epithelium and hematopoietic stem cells inhibited Pten null prostate tumorigenesis, leukemia development, and AKT activation (40, 41), suggesting GRP78 as a potential therapeutic target for cancers that result from PTEN loss or inactivation.

PDACs invariably developed in all Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox mice, suggesting that tumors can compensate for COX-2 loss through other mechanisms. AKT activation is associated with decreased expression of the FKBP5 scaffold protein in Pdx1-Cre+;K-rasG12D/+;Ptenlox/+;Cox-2lox/lox pancreatic tumors (Fig. 7C). Decreased FKBP5 expression has been identified as one of the mechanisms that enhances AKT activity and results in PDAC chemoresistance (30, 42). These data suggest that FKBP5 may function as a tumor suppressor in PDAC development. On the basis of our data showing a correlation between loss of COX-2 expression and decreased FKBP5 expression, we suggest that celecoxib treatment could result in loss of FKBP5-mediated suppression of AKT activation.

Therapeutic implications

Our results and those of others (8) show that therapeutic regimens designed to target COX-2 expression may be most useful for delaying both precursor lesions and PDAC initiation in patients at high risk for pancreatic cancer. Recent studies have shown that dissemination of pancreatic epithelial tumor cells can occur much earlier than previously thought and that these cells can seed distant metastasis (43). Given the fact that PDAC can grow at an exponential rate with micrometastasis developing from small primary tumors before surgical resection (44), it is possible that therapeutics, which delay precursor lesion formation, like COX-2 inhibitors, could be administrated in this previously unappreciated therapeutic window to significantly delay/prevent seeding of metastases in patients at high-risk for PDAC development.

Moreover, our results emphasize the importance of AKT activity in the effectiveness of anti-COX-2 therapies. Recent studies have shown that COX-2 inhibition in lung and colon cancer cells was ineffective at eliciting cell death unless COX-2 inhibitors were used in combination with PPARγ ligand ciglitazone (45) and atorvastatin (46). Induction of cell death, in both studies, was associated with decreased p-AKT activation. We identified increased GRP78 and decreased FKBP5 as 2 mechanisms through which pancreatic tumors could activate AKT. The lack of increased therapeutic benefit from combination celecoxib + gemcitabine treatment of metastatic PDACs (11) could be the result of increased therapeutic resistance resulting from AKT activation. We suggest, therefore, that pathways that cause AKT activation will likely have to be targeted to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Cotargeting the COX-2, RAS/RAF/MAPK, and PI3K/AKT pathways may be necessary to slow progression of late-stage PDACs.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: R. Hill, A.J. Garcia, T.R. Donahue, H.R. Herschman, H. Wu

Development of methodology: R. Hill, T.R. Donahue, H. Wu

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): R. Hill, Y. Li, S. Dry, Y. Wang, H.R. Herschman, H. Wu

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): R. Hill, Y. Li, L.M. Tran, S. Dry, A.J. Garcia, C. Kim, T.R. Donahue, H.R. Herschman, H. Wu

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: R. Hill, S. Dry, A.J. Garcia, T.R. Donahue, H.R. Herschman, H. Wu

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): C. Kim, T.R. Donahue, H. Wu

Study supervision: H.R. Herschman, H. Wu

Initial experiments: J.H. Calvopina

Grant Support

This work is supported, in part, by Damon Runyon Cancer Foundation and USHHS Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award T32 CA009056 (R. Hill, L. Tran, and J.H. Calvopina), UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Seed Grant and NIH grants (UO1 CA84128, RO1 CA107166 to H. Wu; P50 CA086306 to H. Herschman and H. Wu; and R01 CA08452 to H. Herschman).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the UCLA Tissue Procurement Core Laboratory for their technical help, Dr. Bangyan Stiles for sharing protocols, Antreas Hindoyan and Katharina Schlacher for helpful discussions, and Ken-Ichiro Kamei and Tomo-o Ishikawa for providing COX-2 COE and Cox-2flox mice and for assistance in their analyses.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received April 6, 2012.
  • Revision received July 2, 2012.
  • Accepted July 4, 2012.
  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stathis A,
    2. Moore MJ
    . Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: current treatment and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010;7:163–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Herschman HR
    . Regulation of prostaglandin synthase-1 and prostaglandin synthase-2. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1994;13:241–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Masferrer JL,
    2. Reddy ST,
    3. Zweifel BS,
    4. Seibert K,
    5. Needleman P,
    6. Gilbert RS,
    7. et al.
    In vivo glucocorticoids regulate cyclooxygenase-2 but not cyclooxygenase-1 in peritoneal macrophages. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994;270:1340–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Koki A,
    2. Khan NK,
    3. Woerner BM,
    4. Dannenberg AJ,
    5. Olson L,
    6. Seibert K,
    7. et al.
    Cyclooxygenase-2 in human pathological disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;507:177–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Narko K,
    2. Zweifel B,
    3. Trifan O,
    4. Ristimaki A,
    5. Lane TF,
    6. Hla T
    . COX-2 inhibitors and genetic background reduce mammary tumorigenesis in cyclooxygenase-2 transgenic mice. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2005;76:86–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Colby JK,
    2. Klein RD,
    3. McArthur MJ,
    4. Conti CJ,
    5. Kiguchi K,
    6. Kawamoto T,
    7. et al.
    Progressive metaplastic and dysplastic changes in mouse pancreas induced by cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression. Neoplasia 2008;10:782–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Muller-Decker K,
    2. Furstenberger G,
    3. Annan N,
    4. Kucher D,
    5. Pohl-Arnold A,
    6. Steinbauer B,
    7. et al.
    Preinvasive duct-derived neoplasms in pancreas of keratin 5-promoter cyclooxygenase-2 transgenic mice. Gastroenterology 2006;130:2165–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Funahashi H,
    2. Satake M,
    3. Dawson D,
    4. Huynh NA,
    5. Reber HA,
    6. Hines OJ,
    7. et al.
    Delayed progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia in a conditional Kras(G12D) mouse model by a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Cancer Res 2007;67:7068–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Narayanan BA,
    2. Narayanan NK,
    3. Pttman B,
    4. Reddy BS
    . Adenocarcina of the mouse prostate growth inhibition by celecoxib: downregulation of transcription factors involved in COX-2 inhibition. Prostate 2006;66:257–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bertagnolli MM,
    2. Eagle CJ,
    3. Zauber AG,
    4. Redston M,
    5. Solomon SD,
    6. Kim K,
    7. et al.
    Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2006;355:873–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dragovich T,
    2. Burris H III.,
    3. Loehrer P,
    4. Von Hoff DD,
    5. Chow S,
    6. Stratton S,
    7. et al.
    Gemcitabine plus celecoxib in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of a phase II trial. Am J Clin Oncol 2008;31:157–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hill R,
    2. Calvopina JH,
    3. Kim C,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Dawson DW,
    6. Donahue TR,
    7. et al.
    PTEN loss accelerates KrasG12D-induced pancreatic cancer development. Cancer Res 2010;70:7114–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ying H,
    2. Elpek KG,
    3. Vinjamoori A,
    4. Zimmerman SM,
    5. Chu GC,
    6. Yan H,
    7. et al.
    Pten is a major tumor suppressor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and regulates an NF-kappaB-cytokine network. Cancer Discov 2011;1:158–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Donahue TR,
    2. Tran LM,
    3. Hill R,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Kovochich A,
    6. Calvopina JH,
    7. et al.
    Integrative survival-based molecular profiling of human pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:1352–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Covey TM,
    2. Edes K,
    3. Fitzpatrick FA
    . Akt activation by arachidonic acid metabolism occurs via oxidation and inactivation of PTEN tumor suppressor. Oncogene 2007;26:5784–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ishikawa TO,
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Herschman HR
    . Cox-2 deletion in myeloid and endothelial cells, but not in epithelial cells, exacerbates murine colitis. Carcinogenesis 2011;32:417–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kamei K,
    2. Ishikawa TO,
    3. Herschman HR
    . Transgenic mouse for conditional, tissue-specific Cox-2 overexpression. Genesis 2006;44:177–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ishikawa TO,
    2. Herschman HR
    . Conditional knockout mouse for tissue-specific disruption of the cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) gene. Genesis 2006;44:143–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hruban RH,
    2. Rustgi AK,
    3. Brentnall TA,
    4. Tempero MA,
    5. Wright CV,
    6. Tuveson DA
    . Pancreatic cancer in mice and man: the Penn Workshop 2004. Cancer Res 2006;66:14–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maitra A,
    2. Ashfaq R,
    3. Gunn CR,
    4. Rahman A,
    5. Yeo CJ,
    6. Sohn TA,
    7. et al.
    Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an immunohistochemical analysis with automated cellular imaging. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:194–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gu G,
    2. Dubauskaite J,
    3. Melton DA
    . Direct evidence for the pancreatic lineage: NGN3+ cells are islet progenitors and are distinct from duct progenitors. Development 2002;129:2447–57.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Hingorani SR,
    2. Petricoin EF,
    3. Maitra A,
    4. Rajapakse V,
    5. King C,
    6. Jacobetz MA,
    7. et al.
    Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 2003;4:437–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Guerra C,
    2. Collado M,
    3. Navas C,
    4. Schuhmacher AJ,
    5. Hernandez-Porras I,
    6. Canamero M,
    7. et al.
    Pancreatitis-induced inflammation contributes to pancreatic cancer by inhibiting oncogene-induced senescence. Cancer Cell 2011;19:728–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Aguirre AJ,
    2. Bardeesy N,
    3. Sinha M,
    4. Lopez L,
    5. Tuveson DA,
    6. Horner J,
    7. et al.
    Activated Kras and Ink4a/Arf deficiency cooperate to produce metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev 2003;17:3112–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ijichi H,
    2. Chytil A,
    3. Gorska AE,
    4. Aakre ME,
    5. Fujitani Y,
    6. Fujitani S,
    7. et al.
    Aggressive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice caused by pancreas-specific blockade of transforming growth factor-beta signaling in cooperation with active Kras expression. Genes Dev 2006;20:3147–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kojima K,
    2. Vickers SM,
    3. Adsay NV,
    4. Jhala NC,
    5. Kim HG,
    6. Schoeb TR,
    7. et al.
    Inactivation of Smad4 accelerates Kras(G12D)-mediated pancreatic neoplasia. Cancer Res 2007;67:8121–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hingorani SR,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Multani AS,
    4. Combs C,
    5. Deramaudt TB,
    6. Hruban RH,
    7. et al.
    Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 2005;7:469–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zhang LH,
    2. Yang XL,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Cheng JX,
    5. Zhang W
    . Association of elevated GRP78 expression with increased astrocytoma malignancy via Akt and ERK pathways. Brain Res 2011;1371:23–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lin Y,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Chen L
    . Akt is the downstream target of GRP78 in mediating cisplatin resistance in ER stress-tolerant human lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 2011;71:291–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pei H,
    2. Li L,
    3. Fridley BL,
    4. Jenkins GD,
    5. Kalari KR,
    6. Lingle W,
    7. et al.
    FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt. Cancer Cell 2009;16:259–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Gao T,
    2. Furnari F,
    3. Newton AC
    . PHLPP: a phosphatase that directly dephosphorylates Akt, promotes apoptosis, and suppresses tumor growth. Mol Cell 2005;18:13–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Mulholland DJ,
    2. Tran LM,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Cai H,
    5. Morim A,
    6. Wang S,
    7. et al.
    Cell autonomous role of PTEN in regulating castration-resistant prostate cancer growth. Cancer Cell 2011;19:792–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yu HG,
    2. Ai YW,
    3. Yu LL,
    4. Zhou XD,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Li JH,
    7. et al.
    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway plays an important role in chemoresistance of gastric cancer cells against etoposide and doxorubicin induced cell death. Int J Cancer 2008;122:433–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sinnberg T,
    2. Lasithiotakis K,
    3. Niessner H,
    4. Schittek B,
    5. Flaherty KT,
    6. Kulms D,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling sensitizes melanoma cells to cisplatin and temozolomide. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:1500–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Jiao M,
    2. Nan KJ
    . Activation of PI3 kinase/Akt/HIF-1alpha pathway contributes to hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol 2012;40:461–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Carriere C,
    2. Young AL,
    3. Gunn JR,
    4. Longnecker DS,
    5. Korc M
    . Acute pancreatitis markedly accelerates pancreatic cancer progression in mice expressing oncogenic Kras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009;382:561–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Ye R,
    2. Mareninova OA,
    3. Barron E,
    4. Wang M,
    5. Hinton DR,
    6. Pandol SJ,
    7. et al.
    Grp78 heterozygosity regulates chaperone balance in exocrine pancreas with differential response to cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis. Am J Pathol 2010;177:2827–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Alexandre S,
    2. Nakaki T,
    3. Vanhamme L,
    4. Lee AS
    . A binding site for the cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-response element-binding protein as a regulatory element in the grp78 promoter. Mol Endocrinol 1991;5:1862–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Chang SH,
    2. Ai Y,
    3. Breyer RM,
    4. Lane TF,
    5. Hla T
    . The prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 is required for cyclooxygenase 2-mediated mammary hyperplasia. Cancer Res 2005;65:4496–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Fu Y,
    2. Wey S,
    3. Wang M,
    4. Ye R,
    5. Liao CP,
    6. Roy-Burman P,
    7. et al.
    Pten null prostate tumorigenesis and AKT activation are blocked by targeted knockout of ER chaperone GRP78/BiP in prostate epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:19444–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Wey S,
    2. Luo B,
    3. Tseng CC,
    4. Ni M,
    5. Zhou H,
    6. Fu Y,
    7. et al.
    Inducible knockout of GRP78/BiP in the hematopoietic system suppresses Pten-null leukemogenesis and AKT oncogenic signaling. Blood 2011;119:817–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Lou Z,
    3. Wang L
    . The role of FKBP5 in cancer aetiology and chemoresistance. Br J Cancer 2011;104:19–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Rhim AD,
    2. Mirek ET,
    3. Aiello NM,
    4. Maitra A,
    5. Bailey JM,
    6. McAllister F,
    7. et al.
    EMT and dissemination precede pancreatic tumor formation. Cell 2012;148:349–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Haeno H,
    2. Gonen M,
    3. Davis MB,
    4. Herman JM,
    5. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA,
    6. Michor F
    . Computational modeling of pancreatic cancer reveals kinetics of metastasis suggesting optimum treatment strategies. Cell 2012;148:362–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Kim BM,
    2. Maeng K,
    3. Lee KH,
    4. Hong SH
    . Combined treatment with the Cox-2 inhibitor niflumic acid and PPARgamma ligand ciglitazone induces ER stress/caspase-8-mediated apoptosis in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2011;300:134–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Xiao H,
    2. Zhang Q,
    3. Lin Y,
    4. Reddy BS,
    5. Yang CS
    . Combination of atorvastatin and celecoxib synergistically induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2115–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 11 (10)
October 2012
Volume 11, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cell Intrinsic Role of COX-2 in Pancreatic Cancer Development
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cell Intrinsic Role of COX-2 in Pancreatic Cancer Development
Reginald Hill, Yunfeng Li, Linh M. Tran, Sarah Dry, Joseph Hargan Calvopina, Alejandro Garcia, Christine Kim, Ying Wang, Timothy R. Donahue, Harvey R. Herschman and Hong Wu
Mol Cancer Ther October 1 2012 (11) (10) 2127-2137; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0342

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cell Intrinsic Role of COX-2 in Pancreatic Cancer Development
Reginald Hill, Yunfeng Li, Linh M. Tran, Sarah Dry, Joseph Hargan Calvopina, Alejandro Garcia, Christine Kim, Ying Wang, Timothy R. Donahue, Harvey R. Herschman and Hong Wu
Mol Cancer Ther October 1 2012 (11) (10) 2127-2137; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0342
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Sorafenib Targets VCP in Hepatocellular Cancer Cells
  • RSK2 as Therapeutic Target for Myeloma
  • Dll4-Fc Suppresses Liver Metastasis of SCLC Cells
Show more Therapeutic Discovery
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement