Skip to main content
  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Journals
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Radiation Oncology
      • Novel Combinations
      • Reviews
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Preclinical Development

Targeting Interleukin-4 Receptor α with Hybrid Peptide for Effective Cancer Therapy

Liying Yang, Tomohisa Horibe, Masayuki Kohno, Mari Haramoto, Koji Ohara, Raj K. Puri and Koji Kawakami
Liying Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomohisa Horibe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masayuki Kohno
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mari Haramoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koji Ohara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raj K. Puri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koji Kawakami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0363 Published January 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Interleukin-4 receptor α (IL-4Rα) chain is highly expressed on the surface of various human solid tumors. We designed a novel hybrid peptide termed IL-4Rα–lytic peptide that targets the IL-4Rα chain. The IL-4Rα–lytic peptide contains a target moiety to bind to IL-4Rα and a cellular toxic lytic peptide that selectively kills cancer cells. The anticancer activity of the IL-4Rα–lytic peptide was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. It was found that the IL-4Rα–lytic peptide has cytotoxic activity in cancer cell lines expressing IL-4Rα, determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The IC50 ratios of the lytic peptide to the IL-4Rα–lytic peptide correlated well with the expression levels of IL-4Rα on cancer cells (r = 0.80). In addition, IL-4Rα–lytic peptide administered either intratumoraly or intravenously significantly inhibited tumor growth in xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer (BXPC-3) in mice. These results indicate that the IL-4Rα–lytic peptide generated in this study has a potent and selective anticancer potential against IL-4Rα–positive solid cancers. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(1); 235–43. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

By increasing knowledge of unique or overexpressed cell-surface antigens or receptors on tumor cells as targets, immunotoxin, one of the form of cancer therapy drug, has been developed over the last 3 to 4 decades. Immunotoxins are proteins that are composed of a target binding moiety (an antibody or growth factor that binds specifically to target cells) and a toxin moiety (a plant or bacterial toxin; ref. 1). Some immunotoxins have been tested in clinical trails and they exhibited some efficacy in most tested patients (2–5). An agent ONTAK that contains human interleukin-2 and truncated diphtheria toxin has been approved for use in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (6).

However, there are concerns of immunogenicity and hepatotoxicity caused by the immunotoxins (7, 8). Moreover, due to their larger molecular sizes compared with chemical compounds or fragment antibody drugs, many immunotoxins might have difficulty in penetration into human tumor mass (6). To reduce immunogenicity caused by the immunotoxins, several approaches have been used for the design of immunotoxins, such as chemical modification with polyethylene glycol (PEGylation) or fusion with a single-chain Fv of an antibody (9, 10). PEGylation not only blocks immunogenicity but also prolongs half-life. But these immunotoxins still have larger molecular weight and are rather difficult to produce in larger scale.

To overcome these problems, a new hybrid peptide drug, which has a similar concept with immunotoxin but smaller molecular weight, has been developed (11). Anticancer hybrid peptide (type I) contains target-binding amino acids and toxic amino acid sequences. These molecules are chemically stable, small, and can be synthesized by simple peptide chemistry (12).

In the toxic part of the hybrid peptide, we have used a new lytic peptide (11), which is stable when combined with targeting peptide with less toxic to normal cell lines when compared with original lytic peptide composed of a 15 amino acid diastereomer composed of d- and l-amino acids (13).

High-affinity interleukin-4 receptor (IL-4R) is highly expressed on the surface of various human solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, breast carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, glioblastoma, AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (14–20). IL-4R–targeted protein-based immunotoxin was being tested in the clinic for the treatment of human solid tumors (3, 21, 22). The significance of expression of IL-4R on cancer cells still remains obscure. However, these receptors are able to mediate biological responses in cancer cells such as regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and major histocompatibility complex antigen expression, inhibition of cell growth, and induction of apoptosis (23). The IL-4R system exists in 3 different types. Type I IL-4Rs are consisted of a major protein (IL-4Rα) and the IL-2Rγ chain (24, 25). Type II IL-4Rs are composed of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1 chains. Type III IL-4Rs express all 3 chains. The IL-4Rs in solid tumor cells are composed of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1 chains (type II IL-4Rs; refs. 26–28).

These results prompted us to design a new hybrid peptide targeting IL-4Rα–overexpressing cancer cells, comprising of an IL-4Rα–binding moiety and the cellular membrane lytic moiety, termed IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide. In this study, we examined the selective cytotoxicity of IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide to cancer cells in vitro and antitumor activity of the peptide in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Cells and cell culture conditions

Human pancreatic cancer cell line (BXPC-3) was purchased from the European Collection of Cell Cultures. Human glioblastoma (T98G and A172), head and neck cancer (KB), pancreatic cancer (SU.86.86.), lung cancer (H322), and breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Human pancreatic epithelium (PE) cell line was purchased from the DS Pharma Biomedical. No authentication of cell lines was done by the authors. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (BXPC-3, A172, MDA-MB-231, KCCT873, SU.86.86., and H322), minimum essential medium (T98G and KB), or CS-C (PE), respectively, and supplemented with 10% FBS (BioWest), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque). Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37°C.

Peptides

The following peptides were purchased from Invitrogen:

  1. Lytic peptide: KLLLKLLKKLLKLLKKK (bold and underlined letters are d-amino acids.)

  2. IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide: KQLIRFLKRLDRNG-GG KLLLKLLKKLLKLLKKK

All peptides were synthesized by use of solid-phase chemistry, purified to homogeneity (i.e., >80% purity) by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, and assessed by mass spectrometry. Peptides were dissolved in water and buffered to pH 7.4.

Cell viability assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 3 × 103 cells per well in 50 μL medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The peptides diluted in 50 μL culture medium were added to the cells. After 72 hours of incubation, cell viability determinations using WST-8 solution (Cell Count Reagent SF) were carried out according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

Reverse transcriptase PCR analysis

Total RNA of cells was isolated using NucleoSpin RNA Kits (Macherey-Nagel). Each 0.5 μg of the RNA samples was used for an RT reaction. The reaction was carried out in a final volume of 10 μL of reaction mixture with Rever TraAce RT Kit (TOYOBO). Each 1 μL aliquot of the cDNA samples was amplified in a final volume of 25 μL of PCR mixture containing 12.5 μL Primix (Takara) and 1 μL each of the human IL-4Rα primers (forward 5′-CTGACCTGGAGCAACCCGTATC-3′ reverse 5′-GCAGACGGACAACACGATACAG-3′) or each of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) primers (forward 5′-GTCTTCACCACCATGGAGAAGGCT-3′ reverse 5′-CATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCA-3′). GAPDH was used as an internal control. PCR was carried out for 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. PCR product was run in a 1% agarose gel for ultraviolet analysis.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out using SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix Kit (TOYOBO) at Mx3000P Real-Time QPCR System (Stratagene). Amplification was carried out under the following conditions: 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 15 seconds, and 72°C for 45 seconds. The primers are same with RT-PCR analysis.

Annexin V analysis

Cells (PE and SU.86.86.) were cultured in 6-well plates for 15 hours and then were treated for 2 hours at 37°C with or without lytic peptide alone or IL-4Rα–lytic peptide at 10 μmol/L. Cells were washed, collected, and the flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson) analysis was conducted with Annexin V–Fluorescein Staining Kit (Wako). Data were analyzed by CellQuest software.

Cell-cycle analysis

Cell-cycle analysis was conducted as described previously (29). Briefly, SU.86.86. cells were seeded into 6-well plates overnight. The cells were then treated with or without IL-4Rα–lytic peptide. Then the cells were collected, washed with PBS, and fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol at −20°C overnight. After washed twice with PBS, the cell pellet was resuspended in 0.25 mg/mL RNase A (Nacalai Tesque) for 30 minutes at 37°C and in 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (Nacalai Tesque) for 30 minutes at 4°C. The cells were next analyzed with FACS Calibur flow cytometry and Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson).

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP end labeling assay

SU.86.86. cells were cultured in 6-well plate overnight. After incubation with or without IL-4Rα–lytic peptide, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay was conducted by MEBSTAIN Apoptosis Kit Direct (MBL) using flow cytometry according to the manufacture's instructions.

Antitumor activity of IL-4Rα–lytic in tumor xenografts in vivo

Six to 7-week-old female athymic nude mice (BALB/c nu/nu) were obtained from SLC. Human breast tumors were established in nude mice by s.c. injection of 5 × 106 BXPC-3 or MDA-MB-231 cells in 150 μL of PBS into the flank. After 5 days, mice were randomized into 3 groups, and saline (control) or IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (2 or 5 mg/kg) was injected intratumorally (i.t.) or i.v. (50 μL per injection) 3 times a week for 3 weeks. Tumors were measured with a caliper, and the tumor volume was calculated by the following formula: (length of the tumor) × (width of the tumor)2/2 (11). The significance of differences between groups was determined by Student t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Toxicity assessment

For serum chemistry and organ toxicity, serum and tissue samples were obtained 1 day after last injection of the IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide. Organs from these experimental animals were fixed with 10% formalin. Tissue sections (5 μm) prepared from paraffin-embedded blocks were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Microscopy analysis was carried out by Olympus DP25 microscopy.

Results

Design of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide

It is known that various solid tumor cells highly express type II IL-4Rs that are composed of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1 chains (Fig. 1A) and IL-4Rα chain binds IL-4 with high affinity (Kd 20 to 300 pmol/L). Figure 1B shows the structure in the contact interface between human IL-4 and IL-4Rα. It was previously shown that 5 positively charged residues (K77, R81, K84, R85, and R88) and a neighboring residue (N89) are important for binding of human IL-4 to IL-4Rα (30–32). In addition, it was also reported that in the murine IL-4, the main binding site is 79QRLFRAFR86 and the residues R80, R83, and R86 play a crucial role for binding to IL-4Rα (33). Three arginine residues R81, R85, and R88 of human IL-4 may mimic those arginine residues of mouse IL-4 in binding to IL-4Rα as shown in the alignment among human, bovine, murine, and rat IL-4 sequences (Fig. 1C). From these results, we have designed an IL-4 peptide, 77KQLIRFLKRLDRN89, which includes the critical amino acids R81, R85, and R88. SPR analysis showed that the designed peptide can bind to recombinant IL-4Rα with the Kd value of 2.90 × 10−4 mol/L by BIACORE system (data not shown). We then produced IL-4Rα–lytic peptide, which contains lytic sequence (11) including 3 glycine as a spacer. Mutation analysis of IL-4Rα–binding peptide also showed that the sequence shown here was the best to achieve the cytotoxic activity to IL-4Rα–expressing cancer cells, as assessed by WST-8 assay (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Structures of human IL-4 and IL-4Rα and aligned sequences of mature IL-4. A, schematic model of IL-4R on solid tumor cells. B, structure in the contact interface of human IL-4 and IL-4Rα. Significant residues R81, R85, and R88 of IL-4 for the binding to IL-4Rα are indicated as red, magenta, and green color. The information about structure was obtained from Protein Data Bank (1iar), and stick model is shown using Ras Mol software. C, aligned sequences of mature IL-4. The sequences for mature IL-4 were aligned using the program ClustalW. The red letters are the important sequences for human IL-4 binding to IL-4Rα. The blue letters are the critical residues of murine IL-4 binding to IL-4Rα.

Expression levels of IL-4Rα in normal and cancer cell lines

Normal pancreatic cell line PE and 7 cancer cell lines including BXPC-3 and SU.86.86. pancreatic cancer, KB head and neck cancer, T98G and A172 glioblastoma, H322 lung cancer, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer were examined for mRNA expression of IL-4Rα by RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 2A). It was found that the normal cell line PE did not express IL-4Rα mRNA. On the contrary, 6 cancer cell lines expressed different levels of IL-4Rα mRNA. To further compare the expression levels of IL-4Rα mRNA in these cells, quantitative real-time PCR was carried out and it was shown that BXPC-3, SU.86.86., T98G, A172, H322, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines expressed high levels of IL-4Rα. On the other hand, KB cells expressed low level of IL-4Rα, and mRNA of IL-4Rα was not found in the normal PE cells (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The expression levels of IL-4Rα on normal and cancer cell lines and the cytotoxic activity of IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide. Total RNA from normal (PE) and cancer (BXPC-3, SU.86.86., KB, T98G, A172, H322, and MDA-MB-231) cell lines were reverse transcribed to cDNA, and then assessed by PCR (A) or real time quantitative PCR (B) using IL-4Rα–specific primers. GAPDH served as an internal control. C, cytotoxic activity of IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide to normal and cancer cell lines. The data were expressed as a percentage of the untreated control cells (% of control). The experiments were conducted at least 3 times.

Selective killing of cancer cell lines by IL-4Rα–lytic peptide

To assess the cytotoxic activity of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide, WST-8 assay was conducted with normal and cancer cell lines treated with lytic peptide alone or IL-4Rα–lytic peptide. As shown in Fig. 2C, both lytic peptide and IL-4Rα–lytic peptide induced a concentration-dependent cytotoxicity to BXPC-3 and SU.86.86. cancer cells. Less than 10 μmol/L dose of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide sufficiently induced more than 80% of cell death of BXPC-3 and SU.86.86. Whereas, the same concentration of this peptide did not induce cell killing of normal cells (PE). These results suggest that IL-4Rα–lytic peptide has selective cytotoxic activity to distinguish between normal and cancer cells.

Enhancement of the IL-4Rα–lytic peptide–induced cytotoxicity correlates well with the expression levels of IL-4Rα

The cytotoxic activity of lytic and IL-4Rα–lytic peptides is as shown in Table 1. The cytotoxic activity of hybrid peptide was enhanced when compared with that of lytic peptide alone. The IC50 (peptide concentration inducing 50% inhibition of control cell growth) of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide improved 2.0- to 5.1-fold. We then examined whether the enhancement of cytotoxicity of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide was correlated with the expression levels of IL-4Rα in the cells. The expression levels of IL-4Rα in cells was correlated well with IC50 ratio of lytic peptide to IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (r = 0.80, data not shown), indicating the enhancement of cytotoxic activity due to the targeting (IL-4Rα) moiety of hybrid peptide. These results suggest that the increase in cytotoxic activity depends on the expression levels of IL-4Rα in cell.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Cytotoxic activity of peptide to various cell lines and IL-4Rα expression

IL-4Rα–lytic peptide induces rapid killing of cancer cells

We next examined the time course of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide to induce loss of viability of PE normal and BXPC-3 cancer cells. As shown in Fig. 3, 10 μmol/L of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide induced 50% of cancer cell death within 5 to 10 minutes, and 80% of cells were killed by this hybrid peptide after 1 hour, but the same concentration of lytic peptide alone did not induce cytotoxic activity (Fig. 3A). On the contrary, neither lytic peptide alone nor IL-4Rα–lytic peptide did induce optimal cell killing to PE (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide can rapidly and selectively kill cancer cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Rapid killing of cancer cells by IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide. BXPC-3 (A) or PE (B) cells were treated with IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide (10 μmol/L; black columns) or lytic peptide alone (10 μmol/L; white columns) for indicated time periods. Cell viability was determined by WST-8. The results are represented as means ± SD (bars).

Characterization of cancer cell death mechanism by IL-4Rα–lytic peptide

To reveal the mechanism of cancer cell death induced by IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide, flow cytometry analysis was conducted using Annexin V. As shown in Fig. 4A, Annexin V–positive cells were found when 10 μmol/L of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide was added to SU.86.86. cells. The percentage of Annexin V–positive and PI-negative cells (19.78%, lower right region) of SU.86.86 cells treated with IL-4Rα–lytic peptide was higher than that of the control (11%), and the percentage of Annexin V- and PI-positive cells (59.54%) was remarkably higher than the control (3.67%). However, the percentage of Annexin V–positive cells of SU.86.86 cells treated with lytic peptide was not significantly different from that of the control. Treatment of PE cells with lytic peptide alone or IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (10 μmol/L) for 2 hours did not increase Annexin V–positive cells at all. The ratio of Annexin V–positive cell percentage by either lytic peptide alone or IL-4Rα–lytic peptide when compared with untreated normal cells (PE) as control was 1.23 (PE) and 5.44 (SU.86.86.; lytic peptide alone), and 1.77 (PE) and 25.50 (SU.86.86.; IL-4Rα–lytic peptide), respectively (Fig. 4B). To further clarify the characterization of cancer cell death induced by IL-4Rα–lytic peptide, cell-cycle analysis and TUNEL assay were conducted. When SU.86.86. cells were treated with IL-4Rα–lytic peptide for 16 hours, the percentage of sub-G1 was increased from 6.78% to 19.17%, and the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was increased from 2.19% to 42.54%, compared to untreated cells (Supplementary Fig. S1A). On the other hand, there was no significant difference on the percentage of sub-G1 and the value of MFI between treated and untreated cells after 1 hour exposure to the same concentration of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, it was found that cell viability was quickly decreased within 1 hour after the treatment with IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Taken together with these results, it is suggested that the increases in the percentage of sub-G1 population and the MFI value of TUNEL assay were induced by secondary effect after rapid cancer cell death with IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide, and the apoptotic cell death induced by IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide is not primary.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Characterization of cancer cell death mechanism by IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide. A, Annexin V assay. PE or SU.86.86. cells treated with or without lytic or IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (10 μmol/L) for 2 hours were analyzed by flow cytometry for Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining. The percentage of cells in each quadrant is as indicated. B, fold activation of cell death compared with untreated PE cells. The results were represented as the fold increase of untreated dead PE cells (Annexin V–positive cells) as control. C, cell-cycle and TUNEL assay. SU.86.86. cells were treated with or without IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (3 μmol/L) for 1 hour. The percentage of cells in the sub-G1 population of the cell cycle and the intensity of TUNEL signal (MFI) were determined by flow cytometry.

Antitumor activity of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide in vivo

In vitro experiments indicated that IL-4Rα–positive cancer cell lines are highly sensitive to IL-4Rα–lytic peptide. To assess antitumor activity of this hybrid peptide in vivo, nude mice received s.c. injections of 5 × 106 BXPC-3 cells. The efficacy of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide, when administered by different routes, was evaluated in these mice. Intratumoral administration of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide (2 or 5 mg/kg, 3 times a week) significantly inhibited tumor growth. As shown in Fig. 5A (left graph), tumors in saline-treated control mice grew aggressively, reached 979 mm3 by day 59. On the contrary, animals treated with IL-4Rα–lytic peptide showed significant tumor regression at both dosages, the mean tumor sizes were 553 mm3 (2 mg/kg) and 234 mm3 (5 mg/kg) in the treated mice on day 59. Intravenous treatment also showed antitumor activity. As shown in Fig. 5A (right graph), the effect of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide was clearly dose dependent. Two mg/kg dose of the treatment was less effective against BXPC-3 tumor growth. The mean tumor volume was 752 mm3 on day 59, which is smaller than control tumor volume (1,182 mm3, P < 0.05). Five mg/kg dose of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide exhibited superior antitumor activity. The mean tumor volume of treated tumors was 402 mm3, which is significantly smaller than the control tumor at day 59 (P < 0.05).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Antitumor activity of IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide in vivo. BXPC-3 pancretic cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously into athymic nude mice. Intratumoral (i.t.; A, left) or intravenous (i.v.; A, right) injection of either saline or IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide (2 or 5 mg/kg) was provided 3 times per week from the 5th day for 3 weeks as indicated by the arrows. Each group had 6 animals (n = 6). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (bars). B, liver and kidney organs obtained from the mice treated as above were stained with H&E. Images (magnification, ×400) were obtained using light microscopy. Scale bars, 20 μm.

To preliminarily assess peptide drug-related organ toxicities, analyses of complete blood counts and blood serum chemistry, and pathology experiments of major organs (including liver and kidney) were conducted with animals receiving i.t. or i.v. administration of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide. Samples were obtained 1 day after the last injection of drug. In blood examination, animals treated with 5 mg/kg dose of IL-4Rα–lytic peptide by i.v. route showed a minor decline of white blood cell count compared with the control mice. No other abnormality was observed in mice treated with IL-4Rα–lytic peptide either by i.t. or i.v. routes (data not shown). Microscopic analysis showed no abnormal changes in the major organs tissues obtained from the mice treated with IL-4Rα–lytic either by i.t. or i.v. routes (Fig. 5B shows pictures of liver and kidney). Remarkable loss of body weight was not observed.

On the mouse xenograft model of human breast cancer MDA-MB-231, IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide also showed effective antitumor activity when administered by i.t. or i.v. injection (Supplementary Fig. S2A). No abnormal changes were observed in the major organs tissues obtained from the mice treated with IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide (Supplementary Fig. S2B). In addition, no remarkable loss of body weight was observed.

These results indicate that the IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide selectively targets to cancer cells inducing tumor regression without unexpected organ toxicities.

Discussion

It has been reported that several peptides composed of l-amino acids exhibited cytotoxic activity against cancer cell lines in vitro (34, 35), however, most of these l-amino acid–based peptides also affected normal cells, limiting clinical usage. Moreover, some of these l-amino acids peptides failed to exhibit desirable antitumor activity in vivo, because these peptides lose cytotoxic activity in serum in the body circulation due to enzymatic degradation and binding to serum components (36). Supporting these reports, in this study, we also found that both a lytic peptide, which is entirely composed of l-amino acids, and a hybrid peptide composed of IL-4Rα binding moiety and the lytic moiety composed of l-amino acids killed normal cell lines at a low concentration in vitro, and failed to show antitumor activity in vivo (data not shown). N. Papo and colleagues developed a novel lytic peptide composed of dl-amino acids, which selectively killed cancer cells in vitro and in vivo (13). However, because we found that this lytic sequence was not suitable to combine with targeting moiety, we modified the dl-amino acids sequence to appropriately induce modest cancer cells killing, with less toxicity to normal cells in a lower concentration (11). Similar to the lytic peptide previously reported, the new lytic sequence has positive charge and binds to negatively charged membranes (37) and subsequently lyses them (38). It is known that the outer membrane of cancer cells contains a slightly more negatively charged phosphatidylserine than that of normal cells (39). This fact probably, at least partly, contributes to the selectively killing cancer cells of lytic peptide.

By using peptide phage display and molecular modeling, G. Yao and colleagues have showed that in murine the amino acid residues spanning from 76 to 86 (QRLFRAFR) especially the residues R80, R83, and R86 play a crucial role in binding to the IL-4Rα chain (39). It has also been shown that residues K77, R81, K84, R85, R88, and N89 are important for binding of human IL-4 to IL-4R (31, 32). Three arginine residues R83, R85, and R88 on human IL-4 may mimic arginine residues R80, R83, and R86 on mouse IL-4 in binding to IL-4Rα. Taken together, we hypothesize that 77KQLIRFLKRLDRN89 peptide, the IL-4Rα moiety designed in this study, can specifically bind to IL-4Rα on cells. As shown in Fig. 2, IL-4Rα–lytic peptide exhibited enhanced cytotoxic activity to cancer cells expressing IL-4Rα in vitro when compared with lytic peptide alone. The enhancement of the cytotoxic activity against cancer cells depended on the expression levels of IL-4Rα on the cells. Normal cell PE without expressing IL-4Rα is found not sensitive to IL-4Rα–lytic peptide. These results suggest that the binding moiety peptide designed in this study can specifically bind to IL-4Rα in cells.

Although increase in the percentage of sub-G1 population and TUNEL-positive cells were found after 16 hours treatment with IL-4Rα–lytic peptide, these positive cells were not almost found after 1-hour treatment with this peptide (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Fig. S2A). Because IL-4Rα–lytic peptide quickly induced cancer cell death (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S2B), it is suggested that these apoptotic positive cells were induced by secondary effect, however, the detail mechanism of cancer cell death induced by IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide is still obscure.

It was also found that IL-4Rα–lytic peptide exhibited high cytotoxic activity against cancer cells expressing IL-4Rα in vitro (Fig. 2C) and that i.t. administration of this peptide dramatically inhibited the growth of pancreatic cancer BXPC-3 (Fig. 5A) or breast cancer MDA-MB-231 (Supplementary Fig. S2A) tumors in vivo. In addition, i.v. administration of this peptide induced dose-dependent regression of BXPC-3 (Fig. 5A) or MDA-MB-231 (Supplementary Fig. S2A) tumors. We assume that because i.t. administration holds the drug locally at higher concentration in tumor, the antitumor effect exhibited was superior. No specific toxicity was found by either i.t. or i.v. administration. Taken together, IL-4Rα–lytic peptide might be a potent anticancer drug to IL-4Rα–expressing solid tumor, under the condition of local administration or the systemic administration in combination with the suitable drug delivery system.

In conclusion, in this study, we described the IL-4Rα–lytic hybrid peptide targeting IL-4Rα in cancer cells. Further analyses to this drug including cytotoxic mechanisms, detailed safety profiles in animals, and justification of the appropriate usage in clinic will be necessary. These researches are currents ongoing in our laboratory.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Koji Kawakami is a founder and stock holder of Upstream Infinity, Inc. Masayuki Kohno is an employer of Upstream Infinity, Inc. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Grant Support

The study was conducted by a research fund from Olympus Corporation.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Oumi Nakajima and Jun Suzuki, Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Department of Medical chemistry, Kyoto University, for valuable advice on animal and flow cytometry experiments, respectively, and also thank Ms. Ritsuko Asai, Nana Kawaguchi, Aya Torisawa, and Kumi Kodama of Kyoto University for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary material for this article is available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received May 18, 2011.
  • Revision received October 13, 2011.
  • Accepted October 19, 2011.
  • ©2011 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pastan I
    . Targeted therapy of cancer with recombinant immunotoxins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1997;1333:C1–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kreitman RJ,
    2. Squires DR,
    3. Stetler-Stevenson M,
    4. Noel P,
    5. FitzGerald DJP,
    6. Wilson WH,
    7. et al.
    Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin RFB4(dsFv)-PE38 (BL22) in patients with B-cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6719–29.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rand RW,
    2. Kreitman RJ,
    3. Patronas N,
    4. Varricchio F,
    5. Pastan I,
    6. Puri RK
    . Intratumoral administration of recombinant circularly permuted interleukin-4-pseudomonas exotoxin in patients with high-grade glioma. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:2157–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Schnell R,
    2. Staak O,
    3. Borchmann P,
    4. Schwartz C,
    5. Mattey B,
    6. Hansen H,
    7. et al.
    A phase I study with an anti-CD30 ricin A-chain immunotoxin (Ki-4.dgA) in patients with refractory CD30+ Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1779–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kawakami K,
    2. Nakajima O,
    3. Morishita R,
    4. Nagai R
    . Targeted anticancer immunotoxins and cytotoxic agents with direct killing moieties. ScientificWorldJournal 2006;6:781–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kreitman RJ
    . Immunotoxins for targeted cancer therapy. AAPS J 2006;8:E532–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Olsen E,
    2. Duvic M,
    3. Frankel A,
    4. Kim Y,
    5. Martin A,
    6. Vonderheid E,
    7. et al.
    Pivotal phase III trial of two levels of denileukin diftitox for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:376–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kreitman RJ,
    2. Wilson WH,
    3. White JD,
    4. Stetler-Stevenson M,
    5. Jaffe ES,
    6. Giardina S,
    7. et al.
    Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PE38 (LMB-2) in patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1622–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tsutsumi Y,
    2. Onda M,
    3. Nagata S,
    4. Lee B,
    5. Kreitman RJ,
    6. Pastan I
    . Site-specific chemical modification with polyethylene glycol of recombinant immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PE38 (LMB-2) improves antitumor activity and reduces animal toxicity and immunogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:8548–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Melani C,
    2. Figini M,
    3. Nicosia D,
    4. Luison E,
    5. Ramakrishna V,
    6. Casorati G,
    7. et al.
    Targeting of interleukin 2 to human ovarian carcinoma by fusion with a single-chain Fv of antifolate receptor antibody. Cancer Res 1998;58:4146–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kohno M,
    2. Horibe T,
    3. Haramoto M,
    4. Yano Y,
    5. Ohara K,
    6. Nakajima O,
    7. et al.
    A novel hybrid peptide targeting EGFR-expressing cancers. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:773–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ellerby HM,
    2. Arap W,
    3. Ellerby LM,
    4. Kain R,
    5. Andrusiak R,
    6. Rio GD,
    7. et al.
    Anti-cancer activity of targeted pro-apoptotic peptides. Nat Med 1999;5:1032–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Papo N,
    2. Shahar M,
    3. Eisenbach L,
    4. Shai Y
    . A novel lytic peptide composed of DL-amino acids selectively kills cancer cells in culture and mice. J Biol Chem 2003;278:21018–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Obiri NI,
    2. Hillman G,
    3. Haas GP,
    4. Sud S,
    5. Puri RK
    . Expression of high affinity interleukin-4 receptors on human renal cell carcinoma cells and inhibition of tumor cell growth in vitro by interleukin-4. J Clin Invest 1993;91:88–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Obiri NI,
    2. Siegel JP,
    3. Varricchio F,
    4. Puri RK
    . Expression of high-affinity IL-4 receptors on human melanoma, ovarian and breast carcinoma cells. Clin Exp Immunol 1994;95:148–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Leland P,
    2. Taguchi J,
    3. Husain SR,
    4. Kreitman RJ,
    5. Pastan I,
    6. Puri RK
    . Human breast carcinoma cells express type II IL-4 receptors and are sensitive to antitumor activity of a chimeric IL-4-Pseudomonas exotoxin fusion protein in vitro and in vivo . Mol Med 2000;6:165–78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kioi M,
    2. Takahashi S,
    3. Kawakami M,
    4. Kawakami K,
    5. Kreitman RJ,
    6. Puri RK
    . Expression and targeting of interleukin-4 receptor for primary and advanced ovarian cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2005;65:8388–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Puri RK,
    2. Leland P,
    3. Kreitman RJ,
    4. Pastan I
    . Human neurological cancer cells express interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptors which are targets for the toxic effects of IL4-Pseudomonas exotoxin chimeric protein. Int J Cancer 1994;58:574–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Husain SR,
    2. Gill P,
    3. Kreitman RJ,
    4. Pastan I,
    5. Puri RK
    . Interleukin-4 receptor expression on AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma cells and their targeting by a chimeric protein comprised of circularly permuted interleukin-4 and Pseudomonas exotoxin. Mol Med 1997;3:327–38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kawakami K,
    2. Leland P,
    3. Puri RK
    . Structure, function, and targeting of interleukin 4 receptors on human head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:2981–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Weber F,
    2. Asher A,
    3. Bucholz R,
    4. Berger M,
    5. Prados M,
    6. Chang S,
    7. et al.
    Safety, tolerability, and tumor response of IL4-Pseudomonas exotoxin (NBI-3001) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Neuro-Oncol 2003;64:125–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Garland L,
    2. Gitlitz B,
    3. Ebbinghaus S,
    4. Pan H,
    5. de Haan H,
    6. Puri RK,
    7. et al.
    Phase I trial of intravenous IL-4 pseudomonas exotoxin protein (NBI-3001) in patients with advanced solid tumors that express the IL-4 receptor. J immunother 2005;28:376–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Beseth BD,
    2. Cameron RB,
    3. Leland P,
    4. You L,
    5. Varricchio F,
    6. Kreitman RJ,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-4 receptor cytotoxin as therapy for human malignant pleural mesothelioma xenografts. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:436–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Russell SM,
    2. Keegan AD,
    3. Harada N,
    4. Nakamura Y,
    5. Noguchi M,
    6. Leland P,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain: a functional component of the interleukin-4 receptor. Science 1993;262:1880–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kondo M,
    2. Takeshita T,
    3. Ishii N,
    4. Nakamura M,
    5. Watanabe S,
    6. Arai K,
    7. et al.
    Sharing of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor gamma chain between receptors for IL-2 and IL-4. Science 1993;262:1874–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Murata T,
    2. Obiri NI,
    3. Debinski W,
    4. Puri RK
    . Structure of IL-13 receptor: analysis of subunit composition in cancer and immune cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997;238:90–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Obiri NI,
    2. Debinski W,
    3. Leonard WJ,
    4. Puri RK
    . Receptor for interleukin 13 interaction with interleukin 4 by a mechanism that does not involve the common gamma chain shared by receptors for interleukins 2, 4, 7, 9, and 15. J Biol Chem 1995;270:8797–804.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Murata T,
    2. Taguchi J,
    3. Puri RK
    . Interleukin-13 receptor alpha' but not alpha chain: a functional component of interleukin-4 receptors. Blood 1998;91:3884–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Park JK,
    2. Cho CH,
    3. Ramachandran S,
    4. Shin SJ,
    5. Kwon SH,
    6. Kwon SY,
    7. et al.
    Augmentation of sodium butyrate-induced apoptosis by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition in the human cervical cancer cell line. Cancer Res Treat 2006;38:112–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Shen BJ,
    3. Sebald W
    . A mixed-charge pair in human interleukin 4 dominates high-affinity interaction with the receptor α chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:1657–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mueller TD,
    2. Zhang JL,
    3. Sebald W,
    4. Duschl A
    . Structure, binding, and antagonists in the IL-4/IL-13 receptor system. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1592:237–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hage T,
    2. Sebald W,
    3. Reinemer P
    . Crystal structure of the interleukin-4/receptor α chain complex reveals a mosaic binding interface. Cell 1999;97:271–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yao G,
    2. Chen W,
    3. Luo H,
    4. Jiang Q,
    5. Xia Z,
    6. Zang L,
    7. et al.
    Identification of core functional region of murine IL-4 using peptide phage display and molecular modeling. Int Immuno 2005;18:19–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chen HM,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Smith D,
    4. Chan SC
    . Effects of the anti-bacterial peptide cecropin B and its analogs, cecropins B-1 and B-2, on liposomes, bacteria, and cancer cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1997;1336:171–79.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Baker MA,
    2. Maloy WL,
    3. Zasloff M,
    4. Jacob LS
    . Anticancer efficacy of Magainin2 and analogue peptides. Cancer Res 1993;53:3052–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Hoskin DW,
    2. Ramamoorthy A
    . Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2008;1778:357–75.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Shai Y
    . Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1999;1462:55–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Papo N,
    2. Shai Y
    . New lytic peptides based on the D, L-amphipathic helix motif preferentially kill tumor cells compared to normal cells. Biochemistry 2003;42:9346–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Utsugi T,
    2. Schroit AJ,
    3. Connor J,
    4. Bucana CD,
    5. Fidler IJ
    . Elevated expression of phosphatidylserine in the outer membrane leaflet of human tumor cells and recognition by activated human blood monocytes. Cancer Res 1991;51:3062–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 11 (1)
January 2012
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Cancer Therapeutics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Targeting Interleukin-4 Receptor α with Hybrid Peptide for Effective Cancer Therapy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Targeting Interleukin-4 Receptor α with Hybrid Peptide for Effective Cancer Therapy
Liying Yang, Tomohisa Horibe, Masayuki Kohno, Mari Haramoto, Koji Ohara, Raj K. Puri and Koji Kawakami
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2012 (11) (1) 235-243; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0363

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Targeting Interleukin-4 Receptor α with Hybrid Peptide for Effective Cancer Therapy
Liying Yang, Tomohisa Horibe, Masayuki Kohno, Mari Haramoto, Koji Ohara, Raj K. Puri and Koji Kawakami
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2012 (11) (1) 235-243; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0363
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PSMA-Specific BiTE Antibody
  • BiKEs and TriKEs Enhance NK Cell Effector Function
  • Ganetespib Activity in KRAS-Mutant NSCLCs
Show more Preclinical Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About MCT

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
eISSN: 1538-8514
ISSN: 1535-7163

Advertisement