Advertisement
Preclinical Development

MK1775, a Selective Wee1 Inhibitor, Shows Single-Agent Antitumor Activity against Sarcoma Cells

Jenny M. Kreahling, Jennifer Y. Gemmer, Damon Reed, Douglas Letson, Marilyn Bui and Soner Altiok
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0529 Published January 2012

Abstract

Wee1 is a critical component of the G2–M cell-cycle checkpoint control and mediates cell-cycle arrest by regulating the phosphorylation of CDC2. Inhibition of Wee1 by a selective small molecule inhibitor MK1775 can abrogate G2–M checkpoint, resulting in premature mitotic entry and cell death. MK1775 has recently been tested in preclinical and clinical studies of human carcinoma to enhance the cytotoxic effect of DNA-damaging agents. However, its role in mesenchymal tumors, especially as a single agent, has not been explored. Here, we studied the cytotoxic effect of MK1775 in various sarcoma cell lines and patient-derived tumor explants ex vivo. Our data show that MK1775 treatment at clinically relevant concentrations leads to unscheduled entry into mitosis and initiation of apoptotic cell death in all sarcomas tested. In MK1775-treated cells, CDC2 activity was enhanced, as determined by decreased inhibitory phosphorylation of tyrosine-15 residue and increased expression of phosphorylated histone H3, a marker of mitotic entry. The cytotoxic effect of Wee1 inhibition on sarcoma cells seems to be independent of p53 status as all sarcoma cell lines with different p53 mutation were highly sensitive to MK1775 treatment. Finally, in patient-derived sarcoma samples, we showed that MK1775 as a single agent causes significant apoptotic cell death, suggesting that Wee1 inhibition may represent a novel approach in the treatment of sarcomas. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(1); 174–82. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

Sarcomas are rare (1) and heterogeneous forms of cancer with more than 70 recognized histologies (2). While conventional, cytotoxic chemotherapy clearly plays a role in the treatment of some patients with sarcoma, it is unlikely that future escalations of conventional chemotherapy will be tolerable or improve survival and new approaches to therapy are required (3, 4). Toxicity with these agents is high, response rates remain modest, and improvement in overall survival, especially in the metastatic disease setting, remains negligible. Accordingly, new agents are needed for the treatment of this heterogeneous group of diseases (3, 4).

The characterization of important signaling pathways in cancer has led to the development of molecularly targeted therapies that interfere with pathways critical to cancer cell survival (3, 4). Targeted agents are aimed at essential components of cancer cell viability, sparing normal cells and resulting in fewer side effects (5). Inhibition of the pathways critical to tumor cell survival by molecularly targeted therapy represents an opportunity to reverse the biologic basis of tumor formation. Imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) provided the proof of principle that a kinase-directed agent could be effective in a specific sarcoma subtype (6, 7).

The DNA-damage pathway plays an important role in survival of tumor cells upon treatment with DNA-damaging agents. Thus, the regulation of the G2–M transition in eukaryotes through activation of the CDC2–cyclin B complex offers an attractive molecular target in tumor therapy. The proper regulation of CDC2 requires an activating phosphorylation on threonine-161 and inhibitory phosphorylations on threonine-14 and tyrosine-15 (Tyr15; refs. 8, 9). The inhibitory phosphorylation on Tyr15 maintains the CDC2–cyclin B complex in an inactive state if there is incompletely replicated DNA or damaged DNA in the cell (10). CDC2 activation through removal of its inhibitory phosphorylation allows cells to enter the mitotic phase of the cell cycle (8–10). A critical component of this DNA checkpoint is Wee1, a tyrosine kinase that inactivates CDC2 through selective phosphorylation of its Tyr15 residue. In response to DNA damage, Wee1 causes inactivation of CDC2 and consequently leads to G2 arrest that gives tumor cells survival advantage by allowing time to repair their damaged DNA (11–13). Inhibition of Wee1 has been shown to abrogate the G2–M checkpoint, forcing cancer cells with DNA damage to enter into unscheduled mitosis to undergo cell death, often referred to as mitotic catastrophe (14). Furthermore, Wee1 has also been shown to play important roles in spindle formation (15).

Several studies showed that pharmacologic inhibition of Wee1 by a small molecule kinase inhibitor MK1775 exerts antitumorigenic effects in non–small cell lung carcinoma (16), breast (17), prostate (18), pancreatic (19), ovarian (20), and colon (21) cancer when combined with cytotoxic agents. These studies showed that MK1775 is particularly effective in p53-defective cancer cells (11, 16–21).

Here, we show that Wee1 inhibition by MK1775 results in activation of CDC2, as assessed by decreased Tyr15 phosphorylation, unscheduled mitotic entry, and significant cell death in sarcoma cell lines as well as in patient-derived sarcoma tumors. Our data show that MK1775 shows its cytotoxic effect in sarcoma cells as a single agent in a p53-independent manner and represents a promising therapeutic agent in treatment of sarcoma.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and experimental treatments

MG63 (ATCC CRL-1427), SW-872 (ATCC HTB-92), SK-UT-1 (ATCC HTB-114), A673 (ATCC CRL-1598), SK-ES-1 (ATCC HTB-86), MNNG (ATCC CRL-1547), U2OS (ATCC HTB-96), and HT-1080 (ATCC CCL-121) cells (American Type Culture Collection) were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin, and 1% (v/v) l-glutamine at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Stock solutions of the Wee1 inhibitor MK1775 (Selleck Chemicals) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and added to the media at the indicated concentrations. Control cells were treated with vehicle alone. Commercially obtained cells were not authenticated by the authors. (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Structure of MK1775. Molecular weight, 500.6; formula, C27H32N8O2.

Cell growth and viability assays

Cells were seeded into 384-well plates and treated with various increasing doses of MK1775 for 72 hours. Cell viability was measured by the CT-Blue assay (Promega). The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) was determined for each cell line using a method developed by Chou and Talalay (22). This method involves plotting dose–effect curves for each agent and their combination, using a median-effect equation: fa/fu = (D/Dm)m, where D is dose of drug, Dm is dose required for a 50% effect (equivalent to IC50 value), fa and fu are affected and unaffected fractions, respectively (fa = 1 − fu), and m is the exponent signifying the sigmoidicity of the dose–effect curve. The computer software Xlfit version 4.3.1 (ID Business Solutions) was used to calculate the values of Dm and m. The combination index (CI) used for the analysis of the drug combinations was determined by the isobologram equation for mutually nonexclusive drugs that have different modes of action: CI = (D)1/(Dx)1 + (D)2/(Dx)2 + [(D)1(D)2]/[(Dx)1(Dx)2], where (D)1 and (D)2 are relative concentrations of drugs 1 and 2 and x is the percentage of inhibition.

Western blot analysis

Both adherent and detached cells in tissue culture wells were collected in 15-mL conical tubes and centrifuged at 4°C for 5 minutes at 1,000 rpm in an Eppendorf 5810R centrifuge. The supernatant was removed, and the cell pellet was rinsed with ice-cold PBS, after which ice-cold Universal Cell lysis buffer (Millipore) was added. Samples were sonicated, vortexed on ice every 10 minutes for 30 minutes, and then transferred to 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 13,000 rpm at 4°C in an Eppendorf 5417R microcentrifuge. We used the Pierce BCA assay kit to determine protein concentrations, following manufacturer's protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were heated to 95°C for 10 minutes before resolving on an SDS-PAGE with a 4% to 20% gradient gel (BioRad Industries) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore) with a semi-dry transfer device (BioRad Industries). The membrane was blocked for 1 hour at room temperature in Pierce Superblock (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and probed for various antibodies. Enhanced chemiluminescence was carried out following manufacturer's protocols (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Antibodies

Rabbit γH2AX, total CDC2, CDC2 Y15P, and total PARP (tPARP) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology). Mouse p53 antibody was purchased from Calbiochem, EMD Chemicals. Mouse β-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma Aldrich Corporation.

Determination of Annexin V–positive cells by flow cytometry

U2OS, MG63, A673, or HT1080 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of (1 × 105) cells per well. Cells were treated the next day with 500 nmol/L MK1775 and collected 24 hours later for analysis by the BD Annexin APC kit for Flow Cytometry Kit (BD Bioscience) and counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma Aldrich Corporation) per manufacturers' protocols. Cells were detached with Accumax (Innovative Cell Technologies, Inc.), combined with floating cells, and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1,000 rpm at 4°C in an Eppendorf Model 5417R centrifuge. Cell pellets were then rinsed 1× with ice-cold 1× Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS) and centrifuged again for 5 minutes at 1,000 rpm and 4°C. Cells were then resuspended in 1× Annexin V Binding Buffer at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells per mL. An aliquot of 100 μL of this cell suspension was then stained by addition of 5 μL Annexin V/APC solution and 5 μL of DAPI (70 ng/mL) solution and allowed to incubate for 15 minutes on ice in the dark. Positive control cells were prepared by heating an aliquot of cells to 85°C for 2 minutes. Separate aliquots of cells were prepared for Annexin V/APC-only controls and DAPI-only controls. Aliquots of healthy, untreated cells were added to these controls postheating to obtain a representative profile of healthy and unhealthy populations for gating. After the 15-minute incubation was completed, 400 μL of Annexin V Binding Buffer was added to each sample and mixed. Samples were analyzed within 30 minutes on a BD FACScan instrument with FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.) software to determine the percentage of Annexin V–positive cells.

Determination of phosphorylated histone 3–positive cells and cell-cycle analysis by flow cytometry

U2OS, MG63, A673, or HT1080 cells were seeded in 100-cm plates at a density of (1 × 106) cells per plate. Cells were treated the next day with 500 nmol/L MK1775 and collected 24 hours later for analysis by BD Alexa Fluor 647 Rat anti-Histone H3 (pS28; BD Bioscience) and counterstained with DAPI for cell-cycle analysis (Sigma Aldrich Corporation) per manufacturers' protocols. Cells were detached with Accumax (Innovative Cell Technologies, Inc.) and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1,000 rpm at 4°C in an Eppendorf Model 5417R centrifuge. Cell pellets were then rinsed 1× with ice-cold 1× DPBS and centrifuged again for 5 minutes at 1,000 rpm and 4°C. Cells were then fixed by resuspending at 1 × 106 cells per mL in 100 μL BD CytofixTM fixation buffer (BD Bioscience) and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. The fixative was removed by centrifugation at 100 rpm and supernatant aspirated. Cells were then permeabilized by resuspending in 100 μL of −20°C BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III (BD Bioscience) incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. The permeabilizer was then removed by centrifugation at 1,000 rpm and aspirating supernatant, and cells were washed twice with 100 μL of 1× PBS. The PBS was removed and cells were blocked by adding 100 μL of BD Pharmingen Stain Buffer (FBS; BD Bioscience) to each well and incubating for 30 minutes at room temperature. FBS was removed, and a 1:10 dilution of the antibody conjugate in FBS was added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The diluted antibody conjugate was removed, and cells were washed 3 times with 100 μL of 1× PBS. PBS was removed, and cells were counterstained for cell-cycle analysis by adding 100 μL of a 3 μmol/L solution of DAPI (Sigma Aldrich Corporation). Cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS; BD Bioscience) and Cell-Quest and FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.) analysis software, to gate out doublets, we used the conventional doublet discriminator gate based on fluorescence height, fluorescence area, and signal width.

Fluorescence microscopy analyses

For phosphorylated histone 3 (pH3) and casapse-3 activation, U2OS, MG63, A673, or HT1080 cells were seeded in an 8-chamber slide at a density of (6 × 104) cells per mL overnight. Cells were treated with 500 nmol/L MK1775 for 24 hours and used for analysis with BD Alexa Fluor 647 Rat anti-Histone H3 (pS28; BD Bioscience), Cell Signaling Cleaved Caspase-3 Antibody Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugate and counterstained with DAPI for cell-cycle analysis (Sigma Aldrich Corporation) per manufacturers' protocols. After 24-hour treatment, culture medium was removed, and the cells were fixed by adding 100 μL of BD Cytofix fixation buffer (BD Bioscience) to each well and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature, and then fixative was removed. To permeabilize the cells, 100 μL of BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III (BD Bioscience) was added to each chamber at −20°C and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature and then removed. Cells were then washed twice with 100 μL of 1× PBS. PBS was removed, and cells were blocked by adding 100 μL of BD Pharmingen Stain Buffer (FBS; BD Bioscience) and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. The FBS was removed and 100 μL of a 1:50 dilution of the antibody conjugates in FBS was added to each well and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The diluted antibody conjugates were removed, and the cells were washed 3 times with 100 μL of 1× PBS. The nuclei were counterstained with 100 μL ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen), then viewed with a Zeiss-inverted microscope and analyzed with Axiovert software.

For multinucleation, the cells were fixed and permeablized as earlier and nuclei stained with 100 μL ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen), then viewed with a Zeiss-inverted microscope and analyzed with Axiovert software.

Patient-derived ex vivo studies

The ex vivo assays were conducted as previously described (23). Briefly, tumor explants were exposed to MK1775 at 500 nmol/L concentrations for 18 hours, and vehicles as well as MK1775-treated tissue fragments were collected for Western blotting and morphologic studies. All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee and Institutional Review Board at the University of South Florida (Tampa, FL).

Results

Sarcoma cells are highly sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of MK1775

To determine the cytotoxic efficacy of MK1775 on different sarcoma cell types, asynchronously growing MG63, U20S, SW872, A673, SKUT, MNNG, HT1080, and SKES cell lines were treated with MK1775 at increasing concentrations for 72 hours, and CT Blue Assay was used to assess cell viability. As illustrated in Fig. 2A, all sarcoma cell lines were highly sensitive to treatment with IC50 doses in the range of approximately 100 to 550 nmol/L. Our data showed that this effect is independent of p53 mutational status as MK1775 showed effective cell death in both p53 wild-type (U2OS and HT1080) and p53 mutant (MG63, SW872, A673, SKUT, MNNG, and SKES) cell lines (24, 25; Table 1).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

MK1775 treatment induces cell death in sarcoma cell lines. A, cell viability assay of MG63, U20S, SW872, A673, SKUT, MNNG, HT1080, and SKES cells treated with MK1775 for 72 hours. Drug concentrations are indicated on the horizontal axis and plotted against cell viability of control wells. Error bars represent ± SD of 4 replicate wells. B, MG63, U20S, SW872, A673, SKUT, MNNG, HT1080, and SKES cells were treated with 500 nmol/L MK1775 for 24 hours, cell extracts were prepared, and Western blot analysis was conducted with PARP (t, total; c, cleaved), CDC2Tyr15, total CDC2, and γH2AX. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Experiments were repeated at least 3 times, and a representative experiment is shown.

View this table:
Table 1.

Eight cells lines summarizing type of sarcoma, p53 mutational status, and IC50 doses for MK1775 in each of the 9 cell lines calculated from the cell viability assay

MK1775 induces apoptotic cell death in sarcoma cell lines

To better understand the molecular mechanisms of cell death in the presence of MK1775, we conducted Western blot analysis. As illustrated in Fig. 2B, all 8 sarcoma cell lines showed a dramatic decrease in CDC2Tyr15 phosphorylation and a significant increase in cleaved PARP (cPARP) whereas total CDC2 levels remained the same, this shows that MK1775 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in these cell lines at clinically relevant doses (26). In addition, MK1775 treatment led to increased serine 139 phosphorylation of γ-H2AX indicating that MK1775 may also cause DNA damage and lead to mitotic catastrophe by allowing cells with DNA damage to enter into mitosis.

Next, we conducted FACS analysis to evaluate MK1775-mediated cell death and its relationship to p53 mutation in sarcoma cells by using Annexin V and DAPI staining. For this purpose, we chose 4 representative sarcoma cell lines with varying p53 status including U2OS (osteosarcoma—p53 wild-type), MG63 (osteosarcoma—p53 null), A673 (Ewing sarcoma—p53 mutant), and HT1080 (fibrosarcoma—p53 wild-type). Apoptotic cell death was assessed by increased percentage of Annexin V–bound cells (Fig. 3A). The bottom right quadrant of plots in Fig. 3A shows the number of cells in early apoptosis, whereas the top right quadrant shows cells in late cell death. Our results show that all 4 cell lines underwent apoptotic cell death in response to MK1775 independent of their p53 status. MG63 cells had a nearly 15-fold increase in Annexin V positivity, whereas HT1080, A673, and U2OS cells showed 10.2-, 6.6-, and 3.4-fold increase in the Annexin V–positive populations, respectively, compared with vehicle-treated control cells (Fig. 3B). To further determine whether MK1775 treatment leads to unscheduled mitotic entry, we first analyzed the microscopic features of sarcoma cells after treatment with MK1775. Cells were treated with MK1775 at indicated concentrations for 24 hours followed by nuclear staining with DAPI. As illustrated in Fig. 3A, bottom, MK1775 treatment caused marked nuclear abnormalities, including multinucleation in all cell lines indicating abnormal mitosis with failed cytokinesis (27, 28). Interestingly, in the same multinucleated cells some of the nuclei show morphologic features of apoptotic cell death consistent with mitotic catastrophe (29). Taken together, these results provide the first evidence that MK1775 monotherapy effectively induces cell death in sarcoma cells in a p53-independent manner.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

MK1775 leads to apoptotic cell death in sarcoma cells. A, MG63, U2OS, A673, and HT1080 cells were treated with 500 nmol/L MK1775 for 24 hours, and the percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by Annexin V/APC binding. Bottom right quadrant of plots shows the number of cells in early apoptosis; these numbers were used in the bar graph. Top right quadrant shows cells in late cell death. Bottom, MK1775 treatment results in multinucleation in sarcoma cells treated with 500 nmol/L MK1775 for 24 hours, and multinucleation and micronucleation were observed using DAPI staining of nuclei and visualized using a Zeiss upright fluorescence microscope at ×630. B, fold change Annexin V–positive cells in control versus 500 nmol/L MK1775-treated cells for 24 hours.

MK1775 induces unscheduled mitotic entry and cell death in sarcomas

To provide further evidence that inhibition of Wee1 by MK1775 leads to mitotic cell death in sarcoma cells, we next conducted immunofluorescence studies to colocalize mitosis and cell death. Mitotic entry was evaluated by pH3 (30, 31), whereas apoptotic cell death was assessed by increased expression of cleaved Caspase-3. As illustrated in Fig. 4A, microscopic examination of MG63, U2OS, A673, and HT1080 cells treated with MK1775 produced micro- and multinucleation with significantly higher pH3 staining. Furthermore, MK1775-treated cells also often showed double staining with pH3 and cleaved caspase-3 compared with vehicle-treated control cells. To further quantify this increase, we conducted FACS analysis using pH3 antibody (Fig. 4B). Cells were counterstained with DAPI to assess DNA fragmentation (data not shown). In each of the cells lines we tested, there was a significant increase in the total amount of pH3 staining upon MK1775 treatment. Taken together, these data show that MK1775 treatment causes cell death associated with abnormal mitosis and failed cytokinesis, which is suggestive of mitotic catastrophe, a type of cell death that occurs during mitosis.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

MK1775 treatment results in mitotic cell death in sarcomas. A, MG63, U2OS, A673, and HT1080 cells were treated with 500 nmol/L MK1775 for 24 hours and stained for pH3 (AlexaFluor 647, red) and cleaved caspase-3 (AlexaFluor 488, green) and counterstained nuclei with DAPI and visualized using a Zeiss upright fluorescence microscope. B, MG63, U2OS, A673, and HT1080 cells were treated with 500 nmol/L MK1775 for 24 hours, and the percentage of total pH3–positive cells in control versus MK1775 treated was determined by FACS, fold change pH3–positive cells in control versus 500 nmol/L MK1775.

MK1775 treatment results in apoptotic cell death in patient-derived tumor explants ex vivo

To evaluate MK1775 treatment in clinically relevant tumor samples, we tested the effect of MK1775 on patient-derived tumors including undifferentiated high-grade sarcoma (UHGS), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and pleomorphic spindle cell tumor (PMSS; Fig. 5A, top). Tumor explants were treated with MK1775 ex vivo at a clinically relevant concentration, as previously described (23). After drug treatment for 24 hours, tumor explants were collected for microscopic evaluation and Western blot analysis to assess target inhibition and cell death (Fig. 5). As illustrated in Fig. 5A, bottom, ex vivo treatment of cells with MK1775 (500 nmol/L) caused increased cell death and activation of CDC2 in all samples, as analyzed by PARP cleavage and CDC2Tyr15 inhibition, whereas total CDC2 levels remained the same. The histologic analysis of tumor explants confirmed that MK1775 treatment caused dramatic cell death, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained paraffin section of vehicle and MK1775-treated UHGS, PMSS, and MPNST explants are shown in Fig. 5B.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

MK1775 treatment results in increased cPARP and CDC2 phosphorylation. A, UHGS, MPNST, and PMSS tumor explants were treated with MK1775 (500 nmol/L) for 24 hours. H&E-stained paraffin sections and cell extracts were prepared from tumor explants to assess microscopic features and expression levels of cPARP, CDC2Tyr15, and total CDC2 were analyzed by Western blotting, respectively. β-Actin expression was used as loading control. B, patient-derived UHGS, PMSS, and MPNST tumor explants were treated with vehicle (control) or MK1775 (500 nmol/L) for 24 hours. Representative H&E-stained paraffin sections were prepared to assess microscopic features of cell death.

These results further support the findings presented earlier with sarcoma cell lines and strongly suggest that MK1775 could be used as a single agent in the treatment of patients with sarcoma in future clinical studies.

Discussion

Sarcomas are heterogeneous mesenchymal tumors affecting both pediatric and adult populations (4). Approximately 10% of children with cancer are diagnosed with sarcomas, compared with 8% for young adults and 1% of adults (>40 years old) diagnosed with cancer. Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma constitute about 3 quarters of all children with sarcomas, whereas liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcomas, synovial sarcoma, and MPNST represent some of the more common histologies in the adult population (32, 33). Localized sarcomas are frequently treated with multimodal therapy including surgery, radiation therapy, and anthracycline-based chemotherapy with curative intent. However, disappointingly, cure rates have only been very modestly improved for recurrent and metastatic sarcomas. Multiple attempts at increasing the doses of these conventional chemotherapeutic agents have increased toxicity without improved efficacy (34, 35). Thus, there is a pressing need to develop novel therapies to improve outcomes in patients with sarcoma. Here, we showed that various soft tissue and bone sarcomas including osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and MPNST are highly sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of MK1775 when used as a single agent at clinically achievable concentrations.

The G2–M DNA damage checkpoint is an important cell-cycle checkpoint in eukaryotic organisms ensuring that cells do not initiate mitosis before they repair damaged DNA after replication. Wee1 is a tyrosine kinase with a key role as an inhibitory regulator of the G2–M checkpoint that precedes entry into mitosis (9). There is compelling evidence that abrogation of this checkpoint through Wee1 inhibition may result in increased antitumor activity of agents that cause DNA damage such as radiation therapy or some cytotoxic agents (14).

Our data presented here show that MK1775 treatment leads to unscheduled CDC2Y15 activation and consequently premature mitotic entry and cell death of sarcoma cells. MK1775 treatment led to increased serine 139 phosphorylation of γ-H2AX (Fig. 2B) indicating that inhibition of Wee1 may also cause DNA damage and lead to mitotic catastrophe by allowing cells with DNA damage to enter into mitosis. Interestingly, in previous studies, acute deletion of Wee1 has been shown to cause profound growth defects and cell death in mouse models (36). Wee1-deficient cells have been shown to display chromosome aneuploidy and DNA damage providing evidence that mammalian Wee1 also plays a critical role in maintaining genome integrity (36).

Previous reports using MK1775 and other Wee1 inhibitors in combination with DNA-damaging agents or radiotherapy showed that p53-deficient cancer cells are more sensitive to Wee1 inhibition (14, 16–20, 37). These studies indicated that defective p53 pathway allows cells to pass G1–S checkpoint making them largely dependent on G2–M arrest to repair damage by cytotoxic agents. Therefore, p53 mutation has been proposed as a predictor of tumor response to Wee1 inhibitors in clinical trials (14, 38). Our data show that p53 status is not predictive of MK1775 response in sarcoma cells. We showed that MK1775 is effective as monotherapy in sarcoma cells independent of their p53 status, as we observed a similar degree of cell death in sarcoma cells with wild-type p53, mutant p53, and null p53. However, the role of p53 in response of sarcoma cells to combination treatment with MK1775 and DNA-damaging agents remains to be elucidated.

Recent studies showed that MK1775 is a well tolerated drug that has not shown a clear dose-limiting toxicity (39). The data presented here together with the high safety profile of this drug strongly suggest that MK1775 can be used as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of both adult as well as pediatric patients with sarcoma.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This study was generously supported in part by the V Foundation for Cancer Research.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Received July 18, 2011.
  • Revision received October 6, 2011.
  • Accepted October 29, 2011.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Ward E,
    4. Hao Y,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Murray T,
    7. et al.
    Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Christopher DM,
    2. Fletcher K,
    3. Krishnan Unni,
    4. Fredrik Mertens
    World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. In: Christopher DM, Fletcher K, Krishnan Unni, Fredrik Mertens , editors. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Loeb DM
    . Targeted therapies for sarcomas: the next generation of treatments. Electronic Sarcoma Update Newsletter [serial on the Internet] 2007;4. Available from: http://sarcomahelp.org/research_center/targeted_therapies.html.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kurzrock R,
    2. Markman M
    1. Ludwig J,
    2. Trent JC
    . Targeted therapy of sarcoma. In: Kurzrock R, Markman M , editors. Targeted cancer therapy. New York: Humana Press; 2008. p. 317–29.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Oeffinger KC,
    2. Mertens AC,
    3. Sklar CA,
    4. Kawashima T,
    5. Hudson MM,
    6. Meadows AT,
    7. et al.
    Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1572–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Demetri GD,
    2. von Mehren M,
    3. Blanke CD,
    4. Van den Abbeele AD,
    5. Eisenberg B,
    6. Roberts PJ,
    7. et al.
    Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med 2002;347:472–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Verweij J,
    2. Casali PG,
    3. Zalcberg J,
    4. LeCesne A,
    5. Reichardt P,
    6. Blay JY,
    7. et al.
    Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364:1127–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. O'Connell MJ,
    2. Raleigh JM,
    3. Verkade HM,
    4. Nurse P
    . Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. EMBO J 1997;16:545–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. 9.↵
    1. Perry JA,
    2. Kornbluth S
    . Cdc25 and Wee1: analogous opposites? Cell Div 2007;2:12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jin P,
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Morgan DO
    . Role of inhibitory CDC2 phosphorylation in radiation-induced G2 arrest in human cells. J Cell Biol 1996;134:963–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Igarashi M,
    2. Nagata A,
    3. Jinno S,
    4. Suto K,
    5. Okayama H
    . Wee1(+)-like gene in human cells. Nature 1991;353:80–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. McGowan CH,
    2. Russell P
    . Human Wee1 kinase inhibits cell division by phosphorylating p34cdc2 exclusively on Tyr15. EMBO J 1993;12:75–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Parker LL,
    2. Piwnica-Worms H
    . Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase. Science 1992;257:1955–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. De Witt Hamer PC,
    2. Mir SE,
    3. Noske DP,
    4. Van Noorden CJ,
    5. Wurdinger T
    . WEE1 kinase targeting combined with DNA damaging cancer therapy catalyzes mitotic catastrophe. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:4200–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Garcia K,
    2. Stumpff J,
    3. Duncan T,
    4. Su TT
    . Tyrosines in the kinesin-5 head domain are necessary for phosphorylation by Wee1 and for mitotic spindle integrity. Curr Biol 2009;19:1670–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yoshida T,
    2. Tanaka S,
    3. Mogi A,
    4. Shitara Y,
    5. Kuwano H
    . The clinical significance of Cyclin B1 and Wee1 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2004;15:252–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Murrow LM,
    2. Garimella SV,
    3. Jones TL,
    4. Caplen NJ,
    5. Lipkowitz S
    . Identification of WEE1 as a potential molecular target in cancer cells by RNAi screening of the human tyrosine kinome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;122:347–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kiviharju-af Hallstrom TM,
    2. Jaamaa S,
    3. Monkkonen M,
    4. Peltonen K,
    5. Andersson LC,
    6. Medema RH,
    7. et al.
    Human prostate epithelium lacks Wee1A-mediated DNA damage-induced checkpoint enforcement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:7211–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rajeshkumar NV,
    2. De Oliveira E,
    3. Ottenhof N,
    4. Watters J,
    5. Brooks D,
    6. Demuth T,
    7. et al.
    MK-1775, a potent Wee1 inhibitor, synergizes with gemcitabine to achieve tumor regressions, selectively in p53-deficient pancreatic cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2799–806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mizuarai S,
    2. Yamanaka K,
    3. Itadani H,
    4. Arai T,
    5. Nishibata T,
    6. Hirai H,
    7. et al.
    Discovery of gene expression-based pharmacodynamic biomarker for a p53 context-specific anti-tumor drug Wee1 inhibitor. Mol Cancer 2009;8:34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Hirai H,
    2. Arai T,
    3. Okada M,
    4. Nishibata T,
    5. Kobayashi M,
    6. Sakai N,
    7. et al.
    MK-1775, a small molecule Wee1 inhibitor, enhances anti-tumor efficacy of various DNA-damaging agents, including 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Biol Ther 2010;9:514–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Chou TC,
    2. Talalay P
    . Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul 1984;22:27–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Brazelle W,
    2. Kreahling JM,
    3. Gemmer J,
    4. Ma Y,
    5. Cress WD,
    6. Haura E,
    7. et al.
    Histone deacetylase inhibitors downregulate checkpoint kinase 1 expression to induce cell death in non-small cell lung cancer cells. PLoS One 2010;5:e14335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Caron de Fromentel C,
    2. Soussi T
    . TP53 tumor suppressor gene: a model for investigating human mutagenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1992;4:1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Souss T
    . The 2010_R1 release of the UMD_TP53 mutation database. 2010 [updated 2010 Jul; cited 2010]. Available from: http://p53.free.fr/index.html.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Blanke CD,
    2. Rankin C,
    3. Demetri GD,
    4. Ryan CW,
    5. von Mehren M,
    6. Benjamin RS,
    7. et al.
    Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:626–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Akakura S,
    2. Nochajski P,
    3. Gao L,
    4. Sotomayor P,
    5. Matsui S,
    6. Gelman IH
    . Rb-dependent cellular senescence, multinucleation and susceptibility to oncogenic transformation through PKC scaffolding by SSeCKS/AKAP12. Cell Cycle 2010;9:4656–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Utani K,
    2. Kohno Y,
    3. Okamoto A,
    4. Shimizu N
    . Emergence of micronuclei and their effects on the fate of cells under replication stress. PLoS One 2010;5:e10089.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Caruso R,
    2. Fedele F,
    3. Luciano R,
    4. Branca G,
    5. Parisi C,
    6. Paparo D,
    7. et al.
    Mitotic catastrophe in malignant epithelial tumors: the pathologist's viewpoint. Ultrastruct Pathol 2011;35:66–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hendzel MJ,
    2. Wei Y,
    3. Mancini MA,
    4. Van Hooser A,
    5. Ranalli T,
    6. Brinkley BR,
    7. et al.
    Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 1997;106:348–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Su TT,
    2. Sprenger F,
    3. DiGregorio PJ,
    4. Campbell SD,
    5. O'Farrell PH
    . Exit from mitosis in Drosophila syncytial embryos requires proteolysis and cyclin degradation, and is associated with localized dephosphorylation. Genes Dev 1998;12:1495–503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Anfinsen K,
    2. Devesa SS,
    3. Bray F,
    4. Troisi R,
    5. Jonasdottir T,
    6. Bruland O,
    7. et al.
    Age-period-cohort analysis of primary bone cancer incidence rates in the United States (1976–2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1770–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Zahm SH,
    2. Fraumeni JF Jr.
    . The epidemiology of soft tissue sarcoma. Semin Oncol 1997;24:504–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Granowetter L,
    2. Womer R,
    3. Devidas M,
    4. Krailo M,
    5. Wang C,
    6. Bernstein M,
    7. et al.
    Dose-intensified compared with standard chemotherapy for nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2536–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Le Cesne A,
    2. Judson I,
    3. Crowther D,
    4. Rodenhuis S,
    5. Keizer HJ,
    6. Van Hoesel Q,
    7. et al.
    Randomized phase III study comparing conventional-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide versus high-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2676–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Tominaga Y,
    2. Li C,
    3. Wang RH,
    4. Deng CX
    . Murine Wee1 plays a critical role in cell cycle regulation and pre-implantation stages of embryonic development. Int J Biol Sci 2006;2:161–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hirai H,
    2. Iwasawa Y,
    3. Okada M,
    4. Arai T,
    5. Nishibata T,
    6. Kobayashi M,
    7. et al.
    Small-molecule inhibition of Wee1 kinase by MK-1775 selectively sensitizes p53-deficient tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:2992–3000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Indovina P,
    2. Giordano A
    . Targeting the checkpoint kinase WEE1: selective sensitization of cancer cells to DNA-damaging drugs. Cancer Biol Ther 2010;9:523–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Leijen S,
    2. Schellens JH,
    3. Shapiro G,
    4. Pavlick AC,
    5. Tibes R,
    6. Demuth T,
    7. Viscusi J,
    8. et al.
    A phase I pharmacological and pharmacodynamic study of MK-1775, a Wee1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in monotherapy and combination with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 3067).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics: 11 (1)
January 2012
Volume 11, Issue 1

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
MK1775, a Selective Wee1 Inhibitor, Shows Single-Agent Antitumor Activity against Sarcoma Cells
Jenny M. Kreahling, Jennifer Y. Gemmer, Damon Reed, Douglas Letson, Marilyn Bui and Soner Altiok
Mol Cancer Ther January 1 2012 (11) (1) 174-182; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0529
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement