Caspase Activation Is Required for Gemcitabine Activity in Multiple Myeloma Cell Lines 1
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611 [C. N., D. G., N. L. K., K. G., S. T. R.], and Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [V. G.]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine potential mechanisms of apoptotic activity of gemcitabine, a pyrimidine nucleoside analogue, in the MM1.S multiple myeloma (MM) cell line. A MM cell line that is sensitive to glucocorticoids (MM1.S) was used for this study. Immunoblotting analysis, cell cycle assays, and annexin V staining were performed to determine whether gemcitabine induced apoptosis in this model. Furthermore, we attempted to delineate the apoptotic pathway by measuring caspase-8 and -9 activity using fluorometric assays. Loss of mitochondrial membrane potential was measured by flow cytometry. Gemcitabine treatment caused apoptosis in MM cell lines as measured by an increase in DNA cleavage, an increase in annexin V binding, a decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential, and activation of caspase activity. Furthermore, cleavage of the caspase substrate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and caspase-3 activation were documented as early as 8 h after treatment with gemcitabine. Caspase-8 and -9 were activated by gemcitabine treatment in this cell line, suggesting several mechanisms of action including death receptor pathway and mitochondrial damage. The addition of interleukin 6 to MM1.S cells treated with gemcitabine offered no protection against gemcitabine-induced cell death. Gemcitabine induced apoptosis in the MM1.S cell line, and its activity required caspase activation. There is a suggestion that mitochondrial integrity is being affected with gemcitabine in this system. Gemcitabine acts independently of interleukin 6, suggesting potential important therapeutic implications in MM patients.
Footnotes
-
↵1 This work was supported in part by Grant CA85915 from the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services and a translational Research Award from Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. This work was also supported by the Rapid Access to Intervention Development program, Developmental Therapeutics, National Cancer Institute, and National Cancer Institute for Clinical Oncology Training Program 5T32 CA 79447-03 (to C. N.). S. T. R. is the Dr. Ralph and Marion Falk Research Trust Translational Researcher of the Lymphoma Society of America.
-
↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Northwestern University Medical School, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail: n-krett{at}northwestern.edu
-
↵3 The abbreviations used are: MM, multiple myeloma; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; IL, interleukin; PS, phosphatidylserine; PI, propidium iodide; CMX-Ros, CMX-Rosamine; ZVAD-fmk, N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone.
-
- Accepted September 27, 2002.
- Received May 3, 2002.
- Revision received September 25, 2002.
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics










