Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Published online first on January 9, 2008
[Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0192]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Online First [PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1535-7163.MCT-07-0192v1
7/1/10    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Pommier, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Pommier, Y.

Spotlight on Molecular Profiling

Predicting cisplatin and trabectedin drug sensitivity in ovarian and colon cancers

Ellen V. Stevens 1, Satoshi Nishizuka , Smitha Antony , Mark Reimers , Sudhir Varma , Lynn Young , Peter J. Munson , John N. Weinstein , Elise C. Kohn , Yves Pommier *

1 1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and 2Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research and 3Mathematical and Statistical Computing Laboratory, Center for Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pommier{at}nih.gov.


   Abstract

Molecular profiling of markers involved in the activity of chemotherapeutic agents can shed light on the successes and failures of treatment in patients and can also provide a basis for individualization of therapy. Toward those ends, we have used reverse-phase protein lysate microarrays to evaluate expression of protein components of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways. Those pathways strongly influence the anticancer activities of numerous drugs, including those that are the focus here, cisplatin and ecteinascidin 743 (Et-743; Yondelis, Trabectedin). Cisplatin is generally more active in cell types deficient in NER, whereas Et-743 tends to be less active in those cells. We measured protein expression and sensitivity to those drugs in 17 human ovarian and colon cancer cell lines (13 of them from the NCI-60 panel) and five xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) patient cell types, each containing a different NER defect. Of the NER proteins giving reliable signals, XPF and XPG showed the highest correlations of protein expression with drug activity across all three tissue-of-origin groups. When we compared protein expression data with mRNA expression data from Affymetrix U133A chips, we found no consistent correlation between the two across the cell lines studied, which reinforces the conclusion that protein measurements can give more interpretable mechanistic information than can transcript measurements. The work reported here provides motivation for larger proteomic studies with more cell types focused on potential biomarkers in additional pharmacologically pertinent pathways. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(1):10–8]

Key Words: microarray, ovarian cancer, colon cancer, xeroderma pigmentosum, biomarkers







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.