
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Articles: Therapeutics, Targets, and Development
Quercetin enhances TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in colon cancer cells by inducing the accumulation of death receptors in lipid rafts
1 Laboratory of Signal Mediated Gene Expression, Institute of Biological Research and Biotechnology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, Athens, Greece; 2 Laboratory of Cell Signaling and Apoptosis, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic; and 3 Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
Requests for reprints: Alexander Pintzas, Laboratory of Signal Mediated Gene Expression, Institute of Biological Research and Biotechnology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 48 Vasileos Konstantinou Avenue, Athens 11635, Greece. Phone: 30-210-7273753; Fax: 30-210-7273745. E-mail: apint{at}eie.gr
Abstract
Cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can induce apoptosis in colon cancer cells through engagement of death receptors. Nevertheless, evading apoptosis induced by anticancer drugs characterizes many types of cancers. This results in the need for combination therapy. In this study, we have investigated whether the flavonoid quercetin could sensitize human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We report that quercetin enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis by causing the redistribution of DR4 and DR5 into lipid rafts. Nystatin, a cholesterol-sequestering agent, prevented quercetin-induced clustering of death receptors and sensitization to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in colon adenocarcinoma cells. In addition, our experiments show that quercetin, in combination with TRAIL, triggered the mitochondrial-dependent death pathway, as shown by Bid cleavage and the release of cytochrome c to the cytosol. Together, our findings propose that quercetin, through its ability to redistribute death receptors at the cell surface, facilitates death-inducing signaling complex formation and activation of caspases in response to death receptor stimulation. Based on these results, this study provides a challenging approach to enhance the efficiency of TRAIL-based therapies. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(9):2591–9]
Introduction
Cancer is the result of a stepwise, progressive disruption of cellular signaling cascades, which control cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation (1). Despite aggressive therapies, most common cancers do not easily undergo apoptosis and they resist to chemotherapy. These result in the need for drug combinations. The target is to reactivate apoptotic cascades and render the cells apoptosis prone so that low doses of cytotoxic drugs cause apoptosis.
Several food polyphenols may act as chemopreventers by reducing the incidence of many types of cancers, especially in colon epithelia (2). Quercetin (3,3',4',5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) is a flavonoid ubiquitous in nature, described as a potential anticancer agent (3, 4). We have shown recently that quercetin mediates preferential degradation of oncogenic Ras proteins, proposing that it could act as a chemopreventer for cancers with frequent mutations of RAS genes (5). Other studies have shown that quercetin acts as a sensitizer in CD95-mediated apoptosis (6) and enhances tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)–mediated apoptosis through Akt dephosphorylation (7).
TRAIL is one of the members of the tumor necrosis factor gene superfamily. It triggers apoptosis by binding as a homotrimeric subunit structure (8) to death receptors DR4 (TRAIL-R1) and DR5 (TRAIL-R2), which contain a death domain in their cytoplasmic tail (9). TRAIL also binds to the decoy receptors DcR1 (TRAIL-R3) and DcR2 (TRAIL-R4) that cannot transmit a cell death signal. Activation of the death signaling pathway involves the recruitment of the adapter protein Fas-associated death domain (FADD) to the DR4 and DR5 and the subsequent recruitment of procaspase-8 or procaspase-10 in a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC; refs. 10, 11). This leads to caspase-8 cleavage and activation of two signaling pathways (12). In type I cells, caspase-8 directly activates effector caspases leading to apoptosis. In type II cells, caspase-8 causes the cleavage of Bid into its active form t-Bid, which translocates to the outer mitochondrial membrane and induces cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO release to the cytoplasm and caspase-9 activation (13). TRAIL has gained interest as a potential candidate for cancer therapy mainly due to its ability to selectively induce apoptosis in many transformed cells but not in normal cells (14), a fact that has been explained by the percentage of large numbers of DR4 and DR5 on the surface of tumor cells and the decoy receptors on normal cells, respectively (15).
Lipid rafts are plasma membrane microdomains enriched in cholesterol and glycosphingolipids. They have an important role in clustering or aggregating surface receptors into membrane complexes at specific sites and this is essential for initiating signaling from several receptors (16–18).
In HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells, quercetin does not induce apoptosis in relatively low concentrations. On the other hand, these cells have already been described as resilient to apoptosis induced by cytokines, such as TRAIL and Fas-L, (19) and this is correlated to their death receptors levels (20). Our results show that, although quercetin does not increase the expression of death receptors at the surface of the cells, it sensitizes colon adenocarcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, mainly through its ability to aggregate death receptors into lipid rafts and thus facilitating the DISC formation as well as the activation of the mitochondrial-dependent death pathway. These findings propose that quercetin could act as a sensitizer for TRAIL-induced apoptosis and this may be a novel strategy for the treatment of a variety of human tumors that resist therapies based on TRAIL.
Materials and Methods
Cell Cultures, Cytotoxicity, and Apoptosis Assays
HT-29, SW-620, and Caco-2 cells (American Type Culture Collection, University Boulevard, Manassas, VA) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, and nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen Life Technologies).
For cell viability, cells were treated with quercetin (Sigma) and/or TRAIL (21) and/or nystatin. All samples were prepared in triplicate. Cells were fixed with methanol, stained with 0.5% crystal violet, and washed with PBS and the remaining crystal violet was extracted using 30% acetic acid. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm. The percentages of apoptotic cells were assessed by exposure to the DNA binding dye Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) and apoptotic measurements were carried out under a fluorescent inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse T-200). SD was used for error bar generation. Differences were evaluated using Student's t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Reverse Transcription-PCR
RNA isolation was done using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies). cDNA was prepared using an oligo(dT) primer and Moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega) following standard protocols. Primers used were the following: DR4, 5'-CAGAACGTCCTGGAGCCTGTAAC-3' (forward) and 5'-ATGTCCATTGCCTGATTCTTTGTG-3' (reverse); DR5, 5'-GGGAAGAAGATTCTCCTGAGATGTG-3' (forward) and 5'-ACATTGTCCTCAGCCCCAGGTCG-3' (reverse); and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, 5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3' (forward) and 5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3' (reverse). The cDNA product was amplified by PCR with Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) using standard protocols; the annealing temperature was 58°C for all primers. The amplified products were separated on 1.2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed using UV illumination. Intensity values were measured using Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences). PCR products were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression.
Immunoblotting
Whole-cell lysates prepared with lysis buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 250 mmol/L sucrose, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 10 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L EGTA, and 1% Triton X-100 supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Immunoblotting was done with the following antibodies: poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, Bid, Bax, cytochrome c, caveolin-1, caspase-3, caspase-8, and
-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.); FADD (BD Transduction Laboratories); DR4 and DR5 (Alexis Biochemicals); and anti–ATP synthase (Invitrogen). Secondary antibodies were from Jackson. The membranes were scanned with Image Storm scanner (Molecular Dynamics) and the values were measured using Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences). Ponceau staining was used for protein loading control, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used for normalization.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Treated cultures were fixed in 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde for 20 min, washed in PBS, and quenched with 50 mmol/L NH4Cl for 15 min. Blocking was in PBS containing 5% fetal bovine serum. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies against DR4 (clone 02B4), DR5 (clone 5C11/G8; prepared in the laboratory of Cell Signaling and Apoptosis), and caveolin-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Secondary antibodies antirabbit red (A21428) and antimouse green (A11001) were from Alexis Biochemicals. The cells were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using an inverted microscope equipped with a filter system. Images were obtained using a fluorescent inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse T-200) with a digital camera.
Raft Isolation
Raft isolation was done as described (18). Briefly, the cells (100 x 106) were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in MES buffer (Sigma) supplemented with 150 mmol/L NaCl and protease inhibitors, containing 1% Triton X-100, before passing through an ice-cold cylinder cell homogenizer. Then, lysates were diluted with MES buffer containing 80% sucrose (w/v), placed at the bottom of a linear sucrose gradient, and centrifuged at 39,000 rpm for 20 h at 4°C. One-milliliter fractions were collected from the top of the gradient, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted.
Immunoprecipitation and Analysis of DISC
The ligand affinity precipitation was done using biotinylated TRAIL (Bio-TRAIL) in combination with streptavidin beads (Pierce Biotechnology), as described previously (22). Ligand affinity precipitates were washed with lysis buffer and the protein complexes were eluted from the beads by the addition of SDS sample buffer and heating at 42°C for 15 min. Proteins were separated in SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted.
Cell Fractionation
Mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions were prepared as described (19). Cells were resuspended in lysis buffer before passing through an ice-cold cylinder homogenizer. Unlysed cells and nuclei were spun down at 750 x g at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 x g at 4°C for 25 min; the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer and represents the mitochondrial fraction. The supernatant was spun at 10,000 x g for 1 h and the final supernatant represents the cytosolic fraction.
Flow Cytometry Analysis
For the histologic analysis of apoptosis, the cells were washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween and fixed with cold (–20°C) methanol for 30 min, and after washing, a fluorescein-conjugated mouse monoclonal antibody (clone M30, CytoDEATH, Roche) for cleaved cytokeratin-18 was added for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were washed and subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.
Results
Quercetin and TRAIL Cooperate to Induce Apoptosis in Colon Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines
To study the effect of the polyphenol quercetin in TRAIL-induced apoptosis, we used the Caco-2 intermediate adenoma as well as the SW-60 and HT-29 adenocarcinoma cell lines. In Fig. 1A
, the cells were treated with quercetin (48 h) or TRAIL (24 h) or the combination of the two (24-h quercetin for 24 h plus 24-h coincubation with quercetin-TRAIL). Quercetin seemed to be a potent sensitizer to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, especially for SW-620 and HT-29 cells. More specifically, in almost all cases, the combination of the two agents caused reduction of the cell viability, which was more than additive (Fig. 1A, white columns). The most significant combinations, using relatively low concentrations of both agents, are highlighted into frames. No significant differences were observed in Caco-2 cells, whereas the combinatory effects of quercetin and TRAIL were similar to additive. The apoptotic potential of the combination of quercetin-TRAIL was specifically studied on HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells, which have shown limited sensitivity to death receptor–mediated apoptosis. Apoptosis was estimated by measuring the percentage of apoptotic nuclei as identified by Hoechst 33258 staining. For this, the cells were pretreated with quercetin for 24 h and subjected to quercetin-TRAIL treatment for the last 6 h. The apoptotic effect under cotreatment conditions was higher than additive, as indicated in Fig. 1B (left). This was further confirmed by the enhanced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage under cotreatment conditions. The levels of the 89-kDa cleaved fragment of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase were doubled when the cells were pretreated for 24 h with quercetin before overnight (16 h) incubation with TRAIL compared with cells that were treated with TRAIL without preincubation with the polyphenol (Fig. 1B, right). Notably, quercetin does not induce poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage at the concentration used and this also confirms the low levels of apoptotic cells observed by Hoechst. All these data show hat quercetin enhances TRAIL efficiency to induce apoptosis in colon adenocarcinoma cells.
|
We next examined the effect of quercetin in combination with TRAIL on the effector caspase-3 cleavage. Interestingly, the 19-kDa cleaved form of caspase-3 after TRAIL treatment was stronger (
3-fold) when the cells were pretreated with quercetin for 24 h (Fig. 2B, top
). Time course analysis of caspase-3 cleavage showed that pretreatment with quercetin induced stronger cleavage of caspase-3 and at an earlier time point (Fig. 2B, bottom). Treatment with quercetin alone did not induce cleavage of caspase-3, confirming the weak ability of the compound to induce apoptosis in HT-29 cells at this concentration. Given that cytokeratin is a direct substrate for caspase-3 and a strong marker for caspase-3 activity in epithelial cells, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was done using a cytokeratin-18 FITC-conjugated antibody, which binds only to cleaved cytokeratin. Cells pretreated with quercetin for 24 h had higher levels of cleaved cytokeratin after treatment with TRAIL for 1, 3, and 6 h (Fig. 2C). Quercetin alone did not induce significant changes in cleaved cytokeratin-18 levels (data not shown). The results were further confirmed by Annexin V-FITC staining at the same conditions (data not shown).
|
|
Quercetin Enhances DISC Formation
As it was shown earlier in this study, quercetin treatment of HT-29 cells did not induce significant changes in the expression of TRAIL receptors DR4 and DR5. In addition, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showed that quercetin did not change the cell surface levels of death receptors (data not shown). These observations did not rule out the possibility that quercetin could facilitate the formation of the DISC complex in response to TRAIL stimulation. Treatment of the cells with biotin-conjugated TRAIL (Bio-TRAIL) for 3 min and pulldown of the DISC-containing receptors with streptavidin beads indicated that caspase-8 and FADD are recruited to the DISC (Fig. 4A
). In Fig. 4B, Bio-TRAIL was added to the cells after 24-h pretreatment with quercetin for the indicated times. Quercetin enhanced the TRAIL-induced formation of DR4 and DR5 aggregates and the recruitment of the procaspase-8 and the adapter protein FADD to the complex. More specifically, the ratio of the 20 min/1 min levels of DR4 and DR5 was elevated in pretreated cells compared with those that were not subjected to quercetin treatment. Similar results were obtained for caspase-8 and FADD, suggesting that the entire complex formation was enhanced by quercetin.
|
|
Discussion
One strategy to overcome resistance of tumor cells is the combination of drugs that activate apoptotic pathways and natural products that facilitate apoptosis in resistant cancer cells (23, 24). Ideally, the use of low doses of a compound that reactivate apoptotic cascades and render the cancer cells apoptosis prone would reduce the need for high doses of the drug (25).
Our study, as well as most other combination studies that involve natural compounds, serves the purpose of stimulating research toward specific natural compounds that can be used as the base structure to design chemopreventive/sensitizing agents. The concentrations of quercetin used in our experiments are not dramatically higher than the concentrations that could be achieved in the plasma after oral administration of dietary supplements or indeed dietary components (26, 27).
TRAIL is a promising therapeutic agent that induces apoptosis selectively in cancer cells. TRAIL has shown limited efficiency in the treatment of several colon cancer cells because of intrinsic or acquired resistance (28, 29). Interestingly, our observations suggest that quercetin cooperate with TRAIL to induce apoptosis in HT-29 cells through its ability to redistribute TRAIL receptors and other components of the DISC complex into lipid rafts. This facilitates the formation of the DISC and the downstream signaling pathway, which contributes to Bax conformational changes, release of cytochrome c, and apoptosis.
Pretreatment with Quercetin Enhances TRAIL-Induced Caspase-3 and Bid Cleavage
In colon adenocarcinoma cell lines tested, quercetin was found to enhance TRAIL-induced cell death, whereas the effects of cotreatment were not so significant for intermediate adenoma cells, indicating a different cell response, probably dependent on the stage they represent. Pretreatment of HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells with quercetin also increased the percentage of apoptotic cells after TRAIL addition. These data show that the resilient to TRAIL HT-29 cells could be converted to TRAIL-sensitive cells by pretreatment with quercetin. Quercetin has been shown to activate apoptotic pathways and to sensitize cells to death receptor–induced apoptosis (6, 30). In a recent study, it has been proposed that 200 µmol/L quercetin induce Akt dephosphorylation and by this way enhances TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity by caspase activation in prostate cancer cells (7). Nevertheless, in our experimental setup, where the highest concentration of quercetin used was 30 µmol/L, there were no changes in phosphorylated Akt levels.
The effector caspase-3 activation has been shown to be required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis (11) in response to TRAIL exposure. In the conditions tested here, pretreatment with quercetin followed by TRAIL incubation induced higher levels of caspase-3 cleavage, which occurred faster and was accompanied by cleavage of cytokeratin-18. Interestingly, our experiments showed that the combination of these two agents also resulted in accelerated cleavage of Bid into its active form t-Bid, followed by stronger cytochrome c release to the cytosol, as well as aggregation of Bax to the mitochondria. These processes gain a lot of interest in the field of mitochondria targeting for cancer chemoprevention (31), whereas many putative cancer chemopreventive agents possess the ability to trigger apoptosis in premalignant or malignant cells in vitro, via the permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane (32).
Sensitization of HT-29 Colon Cancer Cells to TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis by Quercetin Involves Death Receptor Congregation into Lipid Rafts
Pretreatment of HT-29 cells with quercetin enhanced the formation of the DISC in response to TRAIL stimulation. However, this effect was strong only for DR4 and caspase-8. Although in the current study, the expression of the death receptors was not modified by quercetin, it was shown that the polyphenol induced a clustered distribution of death receptors into raft domains of the plasma membrane in contrast to the homogenous distribution of the death receptors observed in untreated cells. DR4 and DR5 together with FADD and procaspase-8 were distributed in the fractions enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids. These clusters could be caveolae, which have been reported previously to contain other death receptors, including Fas (18).
Lipid rafts play an important role in clustering or aggregating surface receptors, signaling enzymes, and adapter molecules into membrane complexes at specific sites and are essential for initiating signaling from several receptors. Several models for signal initiation in rafts have been proposed (33, 34). This redistribution induced by quercetin was not sufficient to trigger cell death, but it contributed to the sensitization to apoptosis induced by TRAIL. How this redistribution of the death receptors into lipid rafts occurs on treatment with quercetin remains a matter of speculation. We could hypothesize that quercetin, traversing through the cell membrane, induces hydrophobic modifications of the cell membrane lipids and by this way results in glycosphingolipid and cholesterol aggregation in the membrane. Previous studies have shown that quercetin induces ceramide aggregation and, thus, mitochondrial permeability transition, leading to apoptosis activation (35). In addition, it has been proposed that ceramide promotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis and that TRAIL-resistant cancers may benefit from combination therapy with ceramide or agents that enhance ceramide accumulation (36). Cyclooxygenase inhibitors can sensitize human colon cancer cells to TRAIL by inducing clustering of the DISC components into caveolae-rich plasma membrane domains (37). All these membrane events are getting to be characterized.
The cholesterol-sequestering molecule nystatin inhibited the surface aggregation of death receptors induced by quercetin and partially restored cell viability reduced by the combination of quercetin with TRAIL. All these data suggest that lipid raft localization of death receptors may be required for optimal cytotoxicity of quercetin and/or TRAIL. They also confirm that death receptor clustering into caveolae is critical for transmembrane signaling and amplification of the death signal (38).
Natural food products have gained considerable attention as cancer chemopreventive agents. The synergism of quercetin and TRAIL in apoptosis induction resulted by the functional complementation of activated extrinsic (death receptor) and intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathways. The potential role of quercetin to overcome the resistance of tumor cells against TRAIL provides an intriguing proposal for combination therapy.
Footnotes
Grant support: Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology Research Programs PENED 01ED227 and 01ED113 (A. Pintzas) and Ministry of Education (1M6837805001) and institutional (AV0Z50520514) Czech grants (L. Andera).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 1/ 2/07; revised 6/26/07; accepted 8/ 1/07.
References
. Oncogene 2003;22:3330–42.[CrossRef][Medline] Kim YH, Lee YJ. TRAIL apoptosis is enhanced by quercetin through Akt dephosphorylation. J Cell Biochem 2007;100:998–1009.[CrossRef][Medline] Pitti RM, Marsters SA, Ruppert S, Donahue CJ, Moore A, Ashkenazi A. Induction of apoptosis by Apo-2 ligand, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family. J Biol Chem 1996;271:12687–90.
-Tocopheryl succinate and TRAIL selectively synergise in induction of apoptosis in human malignant mesothelioma cells. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1644–53.[CrossRef][Medline] Blagosklonny MV. Prospective strategies to enforce selectively cell death in cancer cells. Oncogene 2004;23:2967–75.[CrossRef][Medline] Yuan ZP, Chen LJ, Fan LY, et al. Liposomal quercetin efficiently suppresses growth of solid tumors in murine models. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3193–9.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |