| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Articles: Therapeutics, Targets, and Development
Involvement of specific matrix metalloproteinases during tumor necrosis factor/IFN
–based cancer therapy in mice
1 Department of Molecular Biomedical Research, VIB, 2 Department of Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 3 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; 4 Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; and 5 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Claude Libert, Department for Molecular Biomedical Research, VIB-Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, 9052 Ghent (Zwijnaarde), Belgium. Fax: 32-9-331-3609. E-mail: Claude.Libert{at}dmbr.ugent.be
Abstract
The potent antitumor activity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in combination with IFN-
can only be applied in local regimens due to their strong proinflammatory properties. It has been shown that the broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor BB-94 protects against TNF/IFN-induced toxicity without blocking the antitumor effect. Here, we tried to explain this protective role of BB-94 and sought to assign roles to specific MMPs in TNF/IFN-induced toxicity. By studying the expression of MMP genes in different organs and in the tumor, we observed that the expression levels of MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-12 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-4 are clearly up-regulated in the liver during therapy. MMP-8 and MMP-9 are also up-regulated in the lung and kidney, respectively. In the tumor, most MMP genes are expressed, but only MMP-3 is up-regulated during TNF/IFN treatment. Using MMP-deficient or double-deficient mice, we have shown a mediating role for MMP-3 during TNF/IFN treatment in tumor-free and B16BL6 melanoma-bearing mice. By contrast, MMP-12 seemed to have some protective role in both models. However, because most phenotypes were not extremely outspoken, we have to conclude, based on the set of MMP-deficient mice we have studied, that inhibition of a single MMP will probably not increase the therapeutic value of TNF/IFN, but that rather, broad-spectrum MMP inhibitors will be required. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(9):2563–71]
Introduction
About 30 years ago, a soluble cytokine termed tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was identified as a factor that is produced upon activation of the immune system. Soon, it was discovered that this cytokine can exert considerable cytotoxicity on many tumor cell lines (1) and can cause tumor necrosis in animal model systems (2). Moreover, TNF was the first cytokine to be used in cancer biotherapy. Unfortunately, systemic application of high-dose TNF is excluded due to severe cardiovascular side effects. Furthermore, systemic administration of the maximum tolerated dose to humans is not associated with significant antitumor activity, as shown by phases I-II trials (3). However, pioneering work by Lejeune et al. on isolated limb perfusion led to the establishment of a protocol for local high-dose TNF applications that are associated with manageable systemic side effects (4–7). Use of isolated limb perfusion with a combination of TNF and chemotherapy was approved in 1998 for limb salvage of unresectable soft tissue sarcoma. However, the impracticality of administering TNF systemically prevents assessment of this cytokine's effectiveness in terms of overall patient survival, which depends mainly on metastatic spread throughout the body and, thus, is not affected by locoregional treatments. In this respect, the development of novel and safe systemic antitumor therapies based on TNF are still needed; our research is focused on this need.
During the last decade, it has been shown that matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are associated with all stages of tumor development and metastasis. MMPs are zinc- and calcium-dependent proteolytic enzymes, which regulate various cell behaviors relevant to cancer biology, including cancer cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, migration and invasion, and the regulation of tumor angiogenesis and immune surveillance (8, 9). Tumor-promoting effects have also been reported for the tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMP), although extensive research on the role of TIMPs in cancer have shown that TIMPs also have a pronounced antitumor potential (10, 11). Thus, TIMPs can be double-edged swords displaying both antitumor efficacy and tumor-promoting effects.
Using a broad-spectrum metalloproteinase inhibitor (BB-94), which inhibits MMPs and also other metalloproteinases, and using MMP-deficient mice, we have shown that MMPs also play a mediating role in a model of TNF-induced hepatitis. Furthermore, BB-94 confers protection against the lethal effects of TNF/IFN in tumor-bearing mice without interfering with the antitumor activity (12). This indicates that MMP inhibitors might be effective for increasing the therapeutic potential of systemic TNF/IFN antitumor therapy. Unfortunately, late after the end of the therapy, some mortality occurred, and some tumors relapsed. In addition, BB-94 is insoluble and a nonselective, broad-spectrum inhibitor that would target potentially protective MMPs as well. Therefore, the primary aim of this research was to identify the relevant lethality-mediating MMP(s) with the idea of developing specific inhibitors in the future. To determine the specific MMPs involved in the TNF/IFN therapy, we used two strategies. First, we used reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) to assess the expression of MMPs and TIMPs during treatment with TNF/IFN. Second, we studied the response to TNF/IFN in several tumor-free and B16BL6 melanoma-bearing MMP-deficient mice.
Our studies show that in the TNF/IFN antitumor-model, several MMP genes are up-regulated in the liver. In the tumor, most MMP genes are expressed, but only MMP-3 is up-regulated during TNF/IFN therapy. MMP-3 seems to be an important mediator, and MMP-12 seems protective in the TNF/IFN-based models.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Mice deficient in individual MMP genes were generated by gene targeting as previously described (13–16) or provided by Dr. S. Itohara (MMP-2) and Dr. J. Mudgett (MMP-3). All mutants were backcrossed for at least six generations into a C57BL/6J@ICO background using mice purchased from Charles River France (ICO), after which heterozygotes were intercrossed. Homozygous knock-out and wild-type mice were identified and used for further breeding. All strains were then moved by embryo transfer to a specific pathogen-free animal facility.
MMP-2/9 and MMP-8/9 double-deficient mice with C57BL/6J@ICO background were generated by interbreeding the MMP-2 or MMP-8 knock-out strain with the MMP-9 knock-out strain.
Mice were maintained in a temperature-controlled, air-conditioned animal house with 14- to 10-h-light/dark cycles, and they received food and water ad libitum. They were used between the age of 8 and 15 weeks. All experiments were approved by the local ethics committee.
Cytokines
Recombinant murine TNF and IFN were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified in our laboratory. TNF had a specific activity of 1.0 x 109 IU/mg. IFN had a specific activity of 1.1 x 109 IU/mg. Endotoxin presence in the cytokine preparations could not be detected by a Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay.
Tumor Cell Culture
The murine B16BL6 melanoma cell line was a gift from M. Mareel (Ghent, Belgium) courtesy of I. Fidler (Houston, TX). B16BL6 cells were grown at 37°C in DMEM containing 10% FCS, 1% Na-pyruvate, 1% D-glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin.
Cells were harvested by treatment for 15 min with enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer (Life Technologies, Invitrogen). After three washes in lipopolysaccharide-free PBS (Life Technologies, Invitrogen), cells were counted, and their concentration was adjusted to 6 x 106 cells/mL. About 100 µL of this solution was injected s.c. in the shaved right thigh.
Disease Models
Because the B16BL6 melanoma expresses most MMP genes, we first studied the effect of daily TNF/IFN treatment on a background of complete MMP deficiency. Second, we inoculated the mice with B16BL6 melanoma tumor cells 10 days before starting the treatment. This is a b-restricted tumor that grows in all of our MMP-deficient mice, which were backcrossed into the C57BL/6 b-restricted background. In both models, a mixture of TNF and IFN (0.1 mL) is injected s.c. into the shaven, right hind leg for 10 consecutive days. Mortality and tumor size index (TSI) were scored daily. TSI was defined in square millimeters as a x b, with a being the longest diameter of the tumor and b being the longest diameter perpendicular to a.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR
Each of the 36 mice was inoculated with a B16BL6 melanoma tumor. After 10 days, tumor-bearing mice were divided randomly in two groups. One group was treated with 100 µL PBS, and the other group was treated with 6 µg TNF + 5,000 units of IFN. After 2, 4, and 6 days of treatment, liver, small intestine, colon, kidneys, lungs, heart, and spleen were isolated, each time of six PBS- and six TNF/IFN-treated mice. Total RNA was extracted from all organs using the RNeasy kit from Qiagen. RNA concentrations were determined by measuring absorbance at 260 nm. RNA was stored at –80°C until reverse transcription was done. First-strand cDNA was prepared from 1 µg total RNA using an oligo-dT primer and reverse transcriptase (Superscript; Invitrogen). For semiquantitative RT-PCR, cDNA was diluted 10-fold, and 10 µL of cDNA was amplified using oligonucleotide primers specific for the relevant MMP or actin.
The primer sequences, annealing times and temperatures, and the number of cycles and product sizes are shown in Table 1 . We used a 30-s melting step at 94°C and a 30-s extension step at 72°C.
|
After completion of the PCR, 10 µL of each reaction was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% gel) followed by ethidium bromide staining. The pictures were scanned (ImageMaster VDS; LISCAP Capture Application, v1.0), and intensities of bands were divided by intensities of the corresponding actin signals (measured with ImageMaster TotalLab, v1.0). Mean and SD of control and treated samples were calculated and compared. RT-PCRs for actin and for each MMP were repeated at least twice.
Zymography
Each of the 12 mice was inoculated with a B16BL6 melanoma tumor. After 10 days, tumor-bearing mice were divided randomly in two groups. One group was treated with PBS and the other group with 6 µg TNF + 5,000 units of IFN. After 4 days of treatment, livers were isolated and homogenized. Protein was extracted from the livers, and after normalization of protein concentrations, zymography was done. The samples were separated by electrophoresis in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel containing 1 mg/mL gelatin as a substrate. Gels were then washed for 30 min with 2.5% Triton X-100 and incubated at 37°C for 48 h in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH, 7.5) containing 10 mmol/L CaCl2, 1 µmol/L ZnCl2, and 0.1% Triton X-100 while gently shaking. Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue and destained.
Statistical Analysis
Survival curves (Kaplan-Meyer plots) were compared using a log-rank test. Final mortality rates were compared with a 
2 test. Means ± SD were compared with a Student's t test. *, **, and *** represent 0.01 < P < 0.05, 0.001 < P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively.
Results
Expression of MMPs in Tumor and Organs during TNF/IFN Treatment
TNF is a very strong proinflammatory trigger that leads to activation of the transcription factor NF-
B, binding sites for which have been identified in the promoters of several MMP-encoding genes, e.g., those encoding MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-14, and MMP-19 (8). Furthermore, MMPs are induced by TNF during liver toxicity (17). Therefore, we investigated whether we could identify significant differences in the expression level of MMPs in liver and other organs during TNF/IFN treatment. Expression of the four known TIMPs was also studied. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was done to determine whether normal mouse organs contain mRNAs of several MMPs and TIMPs, and whether this expression is modulated during treatment of tumor-bearing animals with PBS or TNF/IFN. The organs and tumors were harvested on days 2, 4, and 6 after the start of the TNF/IFN therapy, and total RNA was prepared. We isolated liver, small intestine, colon, kidneys, lungs, heart, and spleen. In addition, the organs of three tumor-free mice were isolated as controls.
As shown in Fig. 1A
(which shows the situation on the fourth day of treatment), MMP-9 mRNA was found in livers of tumor-free mice, whereas MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-12, and TIMP-4 were not detected. Furthermore, when mice were inoculated with a B16BL6 tumor and 10 days later treated daily with PBS, gene expression of these MMPs did not change. However, during treatment of tumor-bearing mice with TNF/IFN, expression of MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-12, and TIMP-4 was induced, and MMP-9 was clearly up-regulated after 4 days. This expression pattern was also observed after either 2 or 6 days of treatment (data not shown). We also observed expression of MMP-14, MMP-16, MMP-19, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 in the liver, but their expression did not change during treatment. Other MMPs and TIMP-3 were not expressed in this organ.
|
. All other MMPs and TIMPs were expressed in at least one of the organs, with the exception of MMP-15. Whenever or wherever MMPs and TIMPs were expressed, most of them did not change in expression during the treatment. However, MMP-9 was up-regulated in the kidney and MMP-8 in the lung (Fig. 1A). Although most MMPs and TIMPs were expressed in the tumor, with the exception of MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-11, MMP-15, MMP-24, and TIMP-3 (Fig. 1B), only MMP-3 was significantly up-regulated during therapy (Fig. 1A).
We also examined MMP-2 and MMP-9 protein levels in the liver using gelatin zymography. An overall increase in the levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 was observed in livers of mice treated for 4 days with TNF/IFN when compared with control and PBS-treated livers. However, this was not always the case; levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were also increased in one (out of five) PBS-treated sample, whereas levels of both MMPs were not increased in two (out of five) TNF/IFN-treated mice. In addition, bands corresponding to their activated forms were also evident (Fig. 1C).
Response of Tumor-Free MMP-Deficient Mice to TNF/IFN
Because MMP-deficient mice inoculated with an MMP-expressing tumor (Fig. 1B) cannot be considered as completely deficient for that particular proteinase, we first injected tumor-free knock-out mice with TNF/IFN to assess the response of each mouse strain to daily treatments with TNF/IFN.
Most tumor-free MMP knock-out mice did not differ from their wild-type counterparts in their response to TNF/IFN. However, we observed that mice knocked out for MMP-7, MMP-9, and MMP-12 were slightly sensitized to treatment with TNF/IFN (Fig. 2
, ns). In contrast, tumor-free MMP-3 knock-out mice were significantly and reproducibly protected against the daily treatment with TNF/IFN (Fig. 3
; ***, P = 0.0003).
|
|
, there was no difference in the survival rate of the different MMP knock-out and wild-type mice tested.
The primary aim of this experiment was to examine the effect of MMP deficiency on the lethal outcome of antitumor therapy with TNF/IFN. Tumors were grown by s.c. inoculation of B16BL6 melanoma cells, and 10 days later, the mice were treated daily for 10 consecutive days with 10 or 12.5 µg TNF, combined with 5,000 units of IFN. MMP deficiency had no effect on TNF/IFN-induced tumor regression (data not shown), and again, no real difference was seen in the survival of most MMP-deficient and double-deficient mice compared with their wild-type counterparts (Fig. 3). However, MMP-2 knock-out mice showed an increased susceptibility to the side effects of the therapy. Moreover, the MMP-12 knock-out mice were again more susceptible than their wild-type counterparts. In addition, MMP-3 knock-out mice were slightly protected against the 10-day treatment with TNF/IFN, although not significantly (Fig. 3).
Discussion
There is still a need for development of novel and safer systemic antitumor therapies based on TNF. One possible strategy includes the elucidation and inhibition of critical mediators responsible for the TNF-induced toxicity. We have previously shown that the broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor BB-94 may be useful for this purpose. BB-94 has been reported to inhibit almost all MMPs (19, 20) and some members of the "a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain" (ADAM) family (21, 22). We have shown that, when using BB-94 during systemic TNF/IFN therapy, it prevents mortality in tumor-bearing mice without interfering with the antitumor activity of TNF/IFN (12). However, the protection conferred by BB-94 is not absolute because late deaths occurred in some experiments. This may have been due to some toxicity of BB-94 itself, its poor solubility and pharmacokinetics, or its inhibition of protective molecules. In addition, some tumors relapsed after treatment was stopped. Therefore, we sought to identify the individual MMPs that are expressed in our system and to determine the outcome of TNF/IFN treatment in mice lacking a specific MMP. Because tumors are supposed to produce MMPs, we used TNF/IFN in tumor-free as well as tumor-bearing MMP-deficient and double-deficient mice.
Because MMPs are induced by TNF during liver toxicity (17) and because several MMP-encoding genes contain NF-B–responsive elements (8), we looked for changes in expression levels of MMPs and TIMPs in liver and other organs during TNF/IFN treatment. This study also served to determine which MMP-deficient mice should be tested for their response to TNF/IFN. Organs of control mice were compared with organs of tumor-bearing mice treated with PBS or with TNF/IFN. We found that several MMPs and TIMP-4 are expressed in the liver during treatment with TNF/IFN, MMP-9 is up-regulated in the liver and kidney, and MMP-8 is up-regulated in the liver and lung, the latter being not surprising because MMP-8 plays a mediating role in liver- and lung-specific inflammation (23, 24). The role of MMP-7 and MMP-12 during acute inflammation in the lung has been described (25–27), but we show for the first time that these two MMPs can also be expressed during inflammatory disorders in the liver. Furthermore, a role for TIMP-4 in inflammatory disorders in the liver has not been previously described. Although the B16BL6 tumor constitutively expresses most MMPs and TIMPs, only the expression of MMP-3 seems to be up-regulated during treatment with TNF/IFN. This raises the possibility that MMP-3 mediates some aspect of the antitumor activities of TNF/IFN. Indeed, MMP-3 can induce apoptosis when overexpressed in mammary epithelial cells (9). In conclusion, the expression of five different MMP genes is modulated by TNF/IFN, namely, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-12, and hence, we studied mice deficient in these MMP genes for their response to treatment with TNF/IFN.
Both tumor-free as well as tumor-bearing MMP-3 knock-out mice showed resistance to TNF/IFN injections. However, tumor-bearing MMP-3 knock-out mice were less resistant than tumor-free MMP-3 knock-out mice, possibly due to the strong expression of MMP-3 by the tumor. Still, it is surprising that a difference can be found between tumor-free MMP-3 knock-out and wild-type mice because MMP-3 is not up-regulated in any of the organs during TNF/IFN treatment, but is constitutively expressed in colon, heart, kidney, and lung. However, apart from gene regulation, TNF/IFN treatment could also lead to the activation of MMP-3 (28), and recent studies have shown important proinflammatory roles for MMP-3 (29–31). Another intriguing result is that tumor-free as well as tumor-bearing MMP-12 knock-out mice were slightly, but consistently, more sensitive to TNF/IFN than their wild-type counterparts. These data indicate that MMP-12 has a protective effect in TNF/IFN-induced inflammation. MMP-12 is expressed by macrophages (32), the influx of which and expression of MMP-12 may be required for clearance of debris in the liver. Indeed, lack of MMP-12 expression by macrophages inhibits their ability to invade Matrigel-impregnated sponges in vivo (16). There was no difference in the response between the other tested MMP knock-out and wild-type mice. However, we could observe some disparity in survival between tumor-bearing and tumor-free mice of some groups of animals (both wild-type and knock-out). It could be anticipated that tumor-bearing mice would be generally sicker and, thus, more susceptible to the treatment than tumor-free mice.
Because MMPs as a group have dual roles in TNF-induced inflammation models, some being protective and others sensitizing, MMP inhibitors do not seem to hold much promise to confer protection as adjuvants in TNF/IFN therapy. Nevertheless, we repeatedly found that a broad-spectrum inhibitor, BB-94, could protect for a short period against TNF/IFN-induced toxicity. Using MMP-deficient mice, MMP-3 in particular seemed to be a mediator during TNF/IFN therapy, whereas MMP-12 seemed to have some protective role. None of the MMP-deficient mice exhibited the level of protection conferred by BB-94. This finding might be explained by compensatory mechanisms in which other proteases substitute for the function of the deleted gene. In the future, other MMP-deficient mice will be tested, and the effect of a MMP-3–specific inhibitor, if such inhibitor becomes available, will be evaluated in these experimental models. Expanding the study to ADAM family members is another option: ADAM-10, ADAM-12, and ADAM-17 have been shown to be expressed in particular forms of inflammation (33, 34), and ADAM-17 is involved in the maturation of TNF from the membrane pro-form (35).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. S. Itohara and Dr. J. Mudgett for generously providing MMP-2– and MMP-3–deficient mice, respectively. Leen Puimège and Joke Vanden Berghe are acknowledged for excellent technical assistance. Amin Bredan is acknowledged for editing the manuscript.
Footnotes
Grant support: Fund for Scientific Research (FWO)–Flanders, Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IUAP) Program of the Belgian Science Policy, Vereniging voor Kankerbestrijding, Belgium, the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen), CICYT-Spain, Fundacion M. Botín, and European Union (Cancer Degradome-FP6).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Note: B. Wielockx is currently at the Department of Pathology, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Received 1/ 9/07; revised 5/ 8/07; accepted 7/12/07.
References
, on a syngeneic murine melanoma. Int J Cancer 1986;38:763–9.[Medline] Mocellin S, Rossi CR, Pilati P, Nitti D. Tumor necrosis factor, cancer and anticancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2005;16:35–53.[CrossRef][Medline] Eggermont AM. TNF 
in isolated perfusion systems: success in the limb, developments for the liver credits, debits and future perspectives. Anticancer Res 1998;18:3899–905.[Medline] Eggermont AM, de Wilt JH, ten Hagen TL. Current uses of isolated limb perfusion in the clinic and a model system for new strategies. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:429–37.[CrossRef][Medline] Lejeune F, Lienard D, Eggermont A, et al. Administration of high-dose tumor necrosis factor by isolation perfusion of the limbs. Rationale and results. J Infus Chemother 1995;5:73–81.[Medline] Lejeune FJ, Lienard D, Matter M, Ruegg C. Efficiency of recombinant human TNF in human cancer therapy. Cancer Immun 2006;6:6.[Medline] Overall CM, Lopez-Otin C. Strategies for MMP inhibition in cancer: innovations for the post-trial era. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:657–72.[CrossRef][Medline] Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:161–74.[Medline] Brand K. Cancer gene therapy with tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). Curr Gene Ther 2002;2:255–71.[CrossRef][Medline] Jiang Y, Goldberg ID, Shi YE. Complex roles of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in cancer. Oncogene 2002;21:2245–52.[CrossRef][Medline] Wielockx B, Lannoy K, Shapiro SD, et al. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases blocks lethal hepatitis and apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor and allows safe antitumor therapy. Nat Med 2001;7:1202–8.[CrossRef][Medline] Wilson CL, Heppner KJ, Labosky PA, Hogan BL, Matrisian LM. Intestinal tumorigenesis is suppressed in mice lacking the metalloproteinase matrilysin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:1402–7. and TGF-ß1. J Hepatol 1999;30:48–60.[CrossRef][Medline] Itoh T, Tanioka M, Yoshida H, Yoshioka T, Nishimoto H, Itohara S. Reduced angiogenesis and tumor progression in gelatinase A–deficient mice. Cancer Res 1998;58:1048–51. and its soluble receptors in chronic heart failure patients both in the compensated and decompensated state. Interplay between their levels and metalloproteinase-3. Eur Cytokine Netw 2004;15:231–9.[Medline] Warner RL, Bhagavathula N, Nerusu KC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in acute inflammation: induction of MMP-3 and MMP-9 in fibroblasts and epithelial cells following exposure to pro-inflammatory mediators in vitro. Exp Mol Pathol 2004;76:189–95.[CrossRef][Medline] Warner RL, Beltran L, Younkin EM, et al. Role of stromelysin 1 and gelatinase B in experimental acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:537–44.This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Gutierrez-Fernandez, A. Fueyo, A. R. Folgueras, C. Garabaya, C. J. Pennington, S. Pilgrim, D. R. Edwards, D. L. Holliday, J. L. Jones, P. N. Span, et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Functions as a Metastasis Suppressor through Modulation of Tumor Cell Adhesion and Invasion Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 2755 - 2763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |
, no expression; 
, no significant difference in mean expression compared with PBS-treated samples; 
, significant up-regulation of expression compared with PBS-treated samples. C, protein was extracted from homogenized livers, and gelatin zymography was done on livers of tumor-free control mice (n = 3), livers of tumor-bearing mice treated for 4 d with PBS (n = 6), and livers of tumor-bearing mice treated for 4 d with 6 µg TNF/5,000 units of IFN
; n, indicated inside each graph) and MMP knock-out mice (
; n, indicated inside each graph) were inoculated with a B16BL6 tumor on day 0. Ten days later, the mice were treated daily for 10 consecutive days with TNF/IFN