Molecular Cancer Therapeutics CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, L. M.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:351-360
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Abrogation of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity attenuates tumor growth

Jonathan D. Cheng1, Matthildi Valianou1, Adrian A. Canutescu3, Eileen K. Jaffe3, Hyung-Ok Lee1, Hao Wang2, Jack H. Lai4, William W. Bachovchin4 and Louis M. Weiner1

Departments of 1 Medical Oncology and 2 Biostatistics, 3 Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and 4 Department of Biochemistry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Jonathan D. Cheng, Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497. Phone: 215-728-2450; Fax: 215-728-3639. E-mail: j_cheng{at}fccc.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor-associated fibroblasts are functionally and phenotypically distinct from normal fibroblasts that are not in the tumor microenvironment. Fibroblast activation protein is a 95 kDa cell surface glycoprotein expressed by tumor stromal fibroblasts, and has been shown to have dipeptidyl peptidase and collagenase activity. Site-directed mutagenesis at the catalytic site of fibroblast activation protein, Ser624 -> Ala624, resulted in an ~100,000-fold loss of fibroblast activation protein dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) activity. HEK293 cells transfected with wild-type fibroblast activation protein, enzymatic mutant (S624A) fibroblast activation protein, or vector alone, were inoculated subcutaneously into immunodeficient mouse to assess the contribution of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity to tumor growth. Overexpression of wild-type fibroblast activation protein showed growth potentiation and enhanced tumorigenicity compared with both fibroblast activation protein S624A and vector-transfected HEK293 xenografts. HEK293 cells transfected with fibroblast activation protein S624A showed tumor growth rates and tumorigenicity potential similar only to vector-transfected HEK293. In vivo assessment of fibroblast activation protein DPP activity of these tumors showed enhanced enzymatic activity of wild-type fibroblast activation protein, with only baseline levels of fibroblast activation protein DPP activity in either fibroblast activation protein S624A or vector-only xenografts. These results indicate that the enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein is necessary for fibroblast activation protein–driven tumor growth in the HEK293 xenograft model system. This establishes the proof-of-principle that the enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein plays an important role in the promotion of tumor growth, and provides an attractive target for therapeutics designed to alter fibroblast activation protein–induced tumor growth by targeting its enzymatic activity.

Key Words: Fibroblast activation protein • tumor stromal fibroblasts • serine protease • tumor growth • animal model


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor-associated fibroblasts are functionally and phenotypically distinct from normal fibroblasts that are not in the tumor microenvironment. Tumor fibroblasts synthesize a wide variety of factors that can potentiate tumor growth and invasion. Fibroblasts normally provide mechanical support for tissue through the synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins. Fibroblasts in the tumor stroma have also been shown to express and secrete a large variety of proteases including stromelysin-3, plasminogen activator, and collagenase IV (1–3). Although some malignant cells can also produce proteases, the majority of protease production derives from the host stroma rather than from the tumor cells themselves (4). In addition to proteases, tumor stromal fibroblasts also play a critical role in the tumor microenvironment by providing growth factors and adhesion molecules that contribute to tumor invasion and motility (5–8). The mechanistic pathways by which tumor stromal fibroblasts contribute to the invasive and metastatic behavior of malignant cells are starting to be understood. The selectivity of fibroblast activation protein expression in the tumor stroma suggests that it may play a significant role in stromal contributions to tumor growth and invasion.

Fibroblast activation protein is a type II integral membrane glycoprotein belonging to the serine protease family. Fibroblast activation protein is a 95 kDa cell surface glycoprotein expressed by tumor stromal fibroblasts. Fibroblast activation protein has been shown to have dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) and collagenase activity (9, 10). Fibroblast activation protein is well expressed by reactive stromal fibroblasts in >90% of human epithelial carcinomas (breast, lung, colorectal, and ovary) as determined by immunohistochemistry (11). Neural and lymphoid cells, as well as surrounding normal tissue, do not express fibroblast activation protein. Fibroblast activation protein expression in normal tissue has only been seen in a subset of pancreatic endocrine cells, and transiently in healing wounds. Consistent with its expression in areas of wound-healing fibrosis, fibroblast activation protein has been seen in the tissue-remodeling interface in areas of chronic inflammation, such as liver cirrhosis (12). Epithelial carcinoma cells are also fibroblast activation protein–negative, making fibroblast activation protein an attractive target for the study of tumor stromal cell biology. Stromal cells residing either in benign or premalignant epithelial breast fibroadenomas, or in colorectal adenomas are also predominantly fibroblast activation protein–negative, suggesting that malignancy is required for effective fibroblast activation protein induction. Some bone and soft tissue sarcomas are known to occasionally express fibroblast activation protein (13), consistent with fibroblast activation protein's mesenchymal origin. Seprase, which has a nearly identical genetic sequence to fibroblast activation protein (14), has been reported to be expressed in both the stromal and epithelial compartments of cancers (15–18), and may represent an isoform of fibroblast activation protein. However, the selectivity of fibroblast activation protein for tumor fibroblasts, but not epithelial tumor cells, has been confirmed by immunohistochemical staining in patients with colorectal cancer (10, 19), patients with breast cancer(9), and by reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis of pancreas, lung, and renal cell xenografts (20). Human and murine fibroblast activation proteins have a similar functional homology and an 89% shared sequence identity.

We have previously shown that forced fibroblast activation protein overexpression by tumor cells results in increased tumorigenicity and a significant enhancement in tumor growth (21). Here, we extend those observations by demonstrating that the enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein confers this tumor growth advantage. We show that enzymatic mutants of fibroblast activation protein that are devoid of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity, when xenografted into immunodeficient mice, result in attenuated tumor growth compared with the growth seen when tumors are transfected with wild-type fibroblast activation protein. In addition, treatment of mice with boronic acid inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity results in tumor growth attenuation in a tumor model characterized by murine fibroblast activation protein expression in the surrounding tumor stromal fibroblasts. We thus provide the initial demonstration that specific inhibition of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity results in a therapeutic intervention by which tumor growth is attenuated.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Modeled Protein Structure of Murine Fibroblast Activation Protein
The murine fibroblast activation protein extracellular domain was modeled from the crystal structure of DPP IV (DPPIV) in the Protein Data Bank (22). PSI-BLAST (23) was used to search the nonredundant protein sequence database to construct a position-specific similarity matrix for the sequence of fibroblast activation protein. We searched a sequence database of proteins in the Protein Data Bank using the position-specific matrix, and chose to use the human DPPIV Protein Data Bank entries 1N1M and 1NU8 (to model the inhibitor) as templates, the alignment having an expectation value of 0.0 and a sequence identity of 53% over 722 amino acids of fibroblast activation protein (residues 38-759). This covered all eight blades of the propeller and the hydrolase domain. Side chain conformations for fibroblast activation protein were built onto the backbone structure of DPPIV with the program SCWRL (24), keeping conserved amino acids fixed in their crystallographic Cartesian coordinates. Loopy (25) was used for loop modeling. The software package Chimera5 (26) was used for molecular graphics.

HEK293 Xenografts
Murine fibroblast activation protein cDNA was obtained from primary mouse embryonic fibroblast cultures as previously described (21). Fibroblast activation protein wild-type DNA was enzymatically mutated by site-directed mutagenesis of Ser624 to Ala624. Mutagenic primer 5'-GCCATATGGGGCTGGGCCTACGGAGG-3' were designed to flank the fibroblast activation protein DNA template and alter serine (TCC) at 624 to alanine (GCC). PCR amplification of the mutant DNA was engineered by annealing the mutagenic primers to parental fibroblast activation protein DNA template using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DpnI restriction enzyme was added for digestion of parental, nonmutated DNA. The mutant clone S624A was transformed into XL10-Gold ultracompetent cells by heat pulsation at 42° for 30 seconds. The enzymatically mutated fibroblast activation protein was cloned into pSec/Hygro B plasmid, and expressed by HEK293 cells under antibiotic selection pressure. C.B17/Icr-severe combined immunodeficient (scid) mice were injected s.c. with 7 x 106 HEK293 cells transfected with fibroblast activation protein wild-type, fibroblast activation protein S624A, or vector alone. Animals were maintained under pathogen-free conditions in autoclaved microisolator cages in the Fox Chase Cancer Center Laboratory Animal Facility. Serial tumor measurements were obtained every 3 to 4 days by caliper in three dimensions. Tumor volumes were calculated by the formula volume = height x weight x length x 0.5236. Animals were followed until any mouse developed a tumor measuring > 2 x 2 cm, was observed to be suffering, or seemed moribund. Animals were euthanized according to institutional policy.

In vivo Assay of Fibroblast Activation Protein Dipeptidyl Peptidase Activity
This assay was done as described previously (21), with the following modifications. To determine the degree of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity in tumors, an immunocapture assay was done with Ala-Pro-7-amido-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin (Ala-Pro-AFC) as a substrate. Ninety-six-well Fluoronunc MaxiSorb plates were coated overnight at 4°C with anti–fibroblast activation protein rabbit polyclonal antibody obtained as previously described (21) at a 100 µg/mL dilution. Plates were rinsed with wash buffer consisting of PBS and 0.1% Tween 20, and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 hour at room temperature. HEK293 or HT-29 xenografts were excised and proteins extracted using the detergent tissue protein extraction reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Tumors were homogenized for 60 seconds in the tissue protein extraction reagent at a concentration of 10 mL/g tumor, and samples centrifuged at 14,000 rpm x 10 minutes to pellet the cellular debris. Protein concentrations were assessed and normalized by spectrophotometric determination and bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce). One milligram of the total tumor protein extracts, which contained fibroblast activation protein, was added to the wells and incubated for 1 hour, washed 10 times with PBS 0.1% Tween 20, and DPP activity assessed by cleavage of 0.25 mmol/L Ala-Pro-AFC for 1 hour at room temperature. Release of the free AFC fluorescent substrate was detected on a cytofluor fluorimeter (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland) with 396 nm excitation and 490 emission.

Fibroblast Activation Protein Activity Assay
Km and Vmax values for fibroblast activation protein were estimated from data that measured the release of free AFC from the Ala-Pro-AFC substrate after incubation with fibroblast activation protein. The extracellular domain of both wild-type fibroblast activation protein and S624A fibroblast activation protein were recombinantly expressed, as previously described (21). Assays containing concentrations of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 5 mmol/L of the Ala-Pro-AFC substrate were done in triplicate using serial concentrations of fibroblast activation protein (100, 200, 1,000, 2,000, and 5,000 ng). Assays were done in 100 mmol/L Tris, 100 mmol/L NaCl (pH 7.8) at room temperature with reaction times varying from 5 minutes to 1 hour for wild-type fibroblast activation protein, and required extension of up to 24 hours in order to see product formation with the fibroblast activation protein S624A. Selecting only that data which estimated the initial rate and was within the linear region of the spectrofluorimeter, Km and Vmax values were determined by fitting a hyperbolic equation to the rate versus substrate concentration data using the program SigmaPlot (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago, IL).

Immunohistochemistry
As previously described (21), HEK-fibroblast activation protein tumors from C.B17/Icr-scid mice were paraffin-embedded after fixation with 10% formaldehyde. Five-micron sections were cut and stained. Primary antibody consisting of SAS cut rabbit polyclonal anti–fibroblast activation protein antisera was used in a 1:750 dilution (v/v). Amplification and development by BioGenex (San Ramon, CA) biotin-streptavidin detection system with horseradish peroxidase was done as per manufacturer's directions. The pattern of fibroblast activation protein expression in the tumor sections was assessed.

Flow Cytometry
HEK293 cells transfected with either wild-type fibroblast activation protein or S624A fibroblast activation protein were analyzed by flow cytometry using the rabbit polyclonal anti–fibroblast activation protein antibodies. HEK293 cells (1 x 106) were aliquoted into Falcon 12 x 75 mm polystyrene tubes and the HEK293-transfected cells were washed in fluorescence-activated cell sorting buffer, and 5 µg of the rabbit polyclonal anti–fibroblast activation protein antibodies were added for 30 minutes. After washing again with fluorescence-activated cell sorting buffer, the secondary antibody of GAR-FITC was added for 30 minutes, cells fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, and collected on a FACScan instrument (Becton Dickinson). MOPC-21 was used as an irrelevant control antibody. The entire procedure was done on ice.

Immunofluorescence
HEK293 cells (1 x 106) transfected with either wild-type fibroblast activation protein or S624A fibroblast activation protein were cultured on a cover slip overnight. HEK293-transfected cells were washed in PBS, then fixed using PBS containing 5% sucrose and 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes. After rehydration in PBS, the cells were blocked for 1 hour with 10% bovine serum albumin and then washed in PBS. The cells were subsequently incubated for 60 minutes with 10 µg/mL of the primary rabbit monoclonal antibody 6E1, washed thrice, and incubated for 30 minutes with 3 µg/mL of the secondary rhodamine red donkey anti-rabbit F(ab')2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) in PBS with 3% bovine serum albumin. The cells were washed thrice for 10 minutes in PBS, and once in distilled water. Cover slips were mounted with Vectashield (Vector Lab, Burlingame, CA) with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole for nuclear staining.

Western Analyses
SDS-PAGE gels (10%) were loaded with 200 µg of tissue protein extraction reagent extracted proteins from HT-29 xenografts and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking with 10% milk in PBS + 0.1% Tween, the rabbit polyclonal antibody targeting murine fibroblast activation protein at a dilution of 20 µg/mL, and the secondary antibody of donkey anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) at a 1:1,000 dilution (v/v) was used. Films were developed using Supersignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce). Anti-ß-actin antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in a 1:1,000 dilution was used as a control of loaded protein.

In vitro and In vivo Assay of Val-boroPro
Val-boroPro is a boronic acid inhibitor of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity. To determine the pH dependence of Val-boroPro in inhibiting fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity, Val-boroPro was incubated overnight either in 0.01 N HCl or neutral reaction buffer consisting of 100 mmol/L Tris, 100 mmol/L NaCl (pH 7.8). Serial 10-fold dilutions of Val-boroPro were incubated with 3 nmol/L recombinant murine fibroblast activation protein-extracellular domain at room temperature for 15 minutes prior to the addition of 0.25 mmol/L Ala-Pro-AFC substrate to give final inhibitor concentrations ranging from 4 x 10–4 to 4 x 10–12 mol/L. Inhibition of enzymatic activity was analyzed using a cytofluor fluorimeter and normalized as the percentage of baseline release of free AFC by fibroblast activation protein without inhibitor.

The in vivo effects of Val-boroPro on tumor growth were assessed in cohorts of five C.B17/Icr-scid mice inoculated with 5 x 106 HT-29 colorectal cancer cells s.c. in the flank. Mice were treated with either 50 µg of the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor Val-boroPro in 100 µL normal saline, or 100 1µL normal saline by gastric gavage daily for 3 weeks (days 1-21 of inoculation). Animals were maintained under pathogen-free conditions in autoclaved microisolator cages in the Fox Chase Cancer Center Laboratory Animal Facility. Serial tumor measurements were obtained twice a week by caliper in three dimensions. Tumor volumes were calculated by the formula volume = height x weight x length x 0.5236. Animals were followed until any mouse developed a tumor measuring > 2 x 2 cm, was observed to be suffering, or seemed moribund. Animals were euthanized according to institutional policy.

Statistical Method
A random coefficient model was applied to model the change of tumor size over time and examine the treatment effect on tumor growth. The tumor size for each animal was modeled as a quadratic function over time. Welch's variance-weighted one-way ANOVA with correction for unequal variances was used to compare treatment groups with respect to tumor size at each time point. Repeated measure ANOVA approach was used to compare fluorescence measures of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity among treatment groups. All the statistical analyses were carried out using SAS software and P values less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Revised Model of Fibroblast Activation Protein
We have previously described the modeled structure of murine fibroblast activation protein based on the crystal structure of prolyl oligopeptidase, which shares a 12% sequence identify with fibroblast activation protein (21). The recent availability of the crystal structure of DPPIV (22), which shares a 53% sequence homology with fibroblast activation protein allowed the construction of a revised model of murine fibroblast activation protein as shown in Fig. 1. The modeled structure consists of a short cytoplasmic tail (amino acids 1-6), a single hydrophobic transmembrane region (amino acids 7-25), and a large extracellular domain (amino acids 26-761) consisting of two major domains: (a) bladed ß-propeller domain (amino acids 99-499), and (b) {alpha}ß hydrolase domain (amino acids 500-761) that contains the catalytic triad. The catalytic triad consists of a serine at position 624, aspartic acid at 702, and histidine at 734. The availability of the DPPIV crystal structure allowed a complete modeling of the eight-blade ß propeller component that was just predicted in the previous model, as the closest template structure at that time was a seven-blade ß propeller. In addition, using a newly available crystal structure (1NU8.pdb), we were also able to build a model containing the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor Val-boroPro in the conserved binding site as shown in Fig. 1. The model places the serine catalytic triad in close proximity to the dimerization motif, located within the eight ß-propeller domain. The model predicts that site-directed mutation of S624 -> A624 will induce loss of fibroblast activation protein DPP activity. The revised model also predicts that fibroblast activation protein forms homodimers with a larger side hole of ~25 Å, and a second smaller opening in the ß-propeller domain of ~10 Å. Although there is a four-residue difference between DPPIV and fibroblast activation protein out of 28 side chains in the dimer interface (T736 -> S730, T746 -> R740, G727 -> Q721 and D725 -> N719), this resulted in replacement of a hydrogen bond (T746-D725 -> R740-Q721), and is unlikely to influence the homodimerization interface stability of the modeled fibroblast activation protein.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Predicted murine fibroblast activation protein structure. The modeled structure of fibroblast activation protein based on the crystal structure of DPPIV is hypothesized to consist of homodimers with a larger side hole of ~25 Å (bottom left, side hole), and a second opening in the ß-propeller domain of ~10 Å (bottom right, top hole). The fibroblast activation protein inhibitor Val-boroPro is modeled interacting with Ser624 and His734 of the catalytic triad.

 
Fibroblast Activation Protein Growth Potentiation Is Dependent on Its Enzymatic Activity
Serial substrate dilutions of Ala-Pro-AFC were incubated with recombinantly expressed fibroblast activation protein-extracellular domain, and the data fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation yielding a wild-type fibroblast activation protein Km of ~0.25 mmol/L, with a Vmax of 55 µmol/L/minute/µg. In contrast, site-directed mutagenesis of the catalytic site of fibroblast activation protein S624A resulted in an enzymatic mutant with ~10,000- to 100,000-fold loss of fibroblast activation protein DPP activity at 1 mmol/L substrate concentration. Full-length fibroblast activation protein S624A was expressed by HEK293 cells. This enzymatically inactive mutant was utilized to assess the contribution of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity to tumor growth as compared with our previously described construct of wild-type fibroblast activation protein (21). Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry under nonpermeabilized conditions confirmed the cell surface presence of both wild-type and S624A fibroblast activation protein transfections of HEK293 cells (data not shown).

C.B17/Icr-scid mice were injected s.c. with HEK293 cells that had been transfected with wild-type, and S624A fibroblast activation proteins, or vector alone (mock), and serial tumor measurements were obtained. The growth potentiation of wild-type fibroblast activation protein compared with vector-transfected HEK293 xenografts was confirmed, as shown in the tumor growth curves for all 18 mice in each cohort (Fig. 2). Enhanced tumorigenicity of fibroblast activation protein overexpressing tumors was also seen, as all 18 mice inoculated with 7 x 106 HEK293-fibroblast activation protein wild-type developed tumors by day 49, when mice with large tumors were euthanized according to institutional policy. In contrast, only 13 of 18 and 11 of 18 mice inoculated with HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A or HEK293-vector only cells developed tumors at day 49, respectively (P = 0.046 comparing HEK-fibroblast activation protein versus HEK-fibroblast activation protein S624A). In addition, HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A xenografts showed tumor growth rates similar only to vector-transfected HEK293 controls (Fig. 2). These results indicate that the enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein is necessary for fibroblast activation protein-driven tumor growth in fibroblast activation protein transfected HEK293 cells.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Potentiation of tumor growth by fibroblast activation protein transfection of HEK293 xenografts is dependent on its enzymatic activity. Tumor volumes were assessed weekly from the time of inoculation with 7 x 106 HEK293 cells transfected with either fibroblast activation protein wild-type ({diamondsuit}), fibroblast activation protein S624A ({bullet}), or vector-only ({blacktriangleup}). Potentiation of tumor growth by HEK-fibroblast activation protein wild-type xenografts was seen (P < 0.0001, HEK-fibroblast activation protein wild-type versus HEK-fibroblast activation protein S624A). However, no statistically significant differences in tumor growth were seen between HEK-fibroblast activation protein S624A and HEK-vector. The bottom panel shows the in vivo fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity of these xenografts. The DPP enzymatic activity of HEK293-fibroblast activation protein wild-type, HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A, and HEK293-vector xenografts was assessed on day 21 using an immunocapture assay of fibroblast activation protein from total protein lysates of these tumors. HEK293-fibroblast activation protein wild-type xenografts showed significantly enhanced fibroblast activation protein DPP activity over fibroblast activation protein S624A and vector controls (P = 0.0031 and P = 0.0032, respectively), but no significant differences in DPP activity were seen between HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A and HEK293-vector xenografts (P = 0.133).

 
In vivo determination of fibroblast activation protein DPP enzymatic activity in the tumor xenografts was assessed. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used to capture fibroblast activation protein contained within total protein lysates from fibroblast activation protein transfected HEK293 xenografts obtained 21 days after inoculation into the flanks of C.B17/Icr-scid mice. Significantly enhanced DPP activity was seen in wild-type fibroblast activation protein compared with fibroblast activation protein S624A or vector only controls as seen in Fig. 2 (bottom). Thus, fibroblast activation protein–mediated growth potentiation of HEK293 tumor xenografts is associated with enhanced DPP enzymatic activity within tumors. These results extend our previous observations and support the premise that specific inhibition of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity may provide a therapeutic intervention by which tumor growth is attenuated.

Immunohistochemical Analyses of Xenografts
Immunohistochemistry studies done on the HEK293 xenografts showed cell surface membrane staining of the individual HEK293 cells transfected with wild-type fibroblast activation protein as seen in Fig. 3. Interestingly, immunohistochemical analysis of tumors obtained from mice inoculated with HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A showed infrequent fibroblast activation protein expression by the individual HEK293 cells. Furthermore, when fibroblast activation protein expression was seen in the HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A cells, it was cytoplasmic rather than on the cell membrane. This was surprising given the robust protein presence of fibroblast activation protein S624A on the surface of the inoculated HEK293 cells that was readily detected by both flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Although HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A cells in culture can exhibit the presence of both cell surface and cytoplasmic fibroblast activation protein S624A (data not shown), the expression levels of fibroblast activation protein at the cell surface of HEK293 fibroblast activation protein wild-type and HEK293 fibroblast activation protein S624A cells are similar. However, in vivo inoculation of HEK fibroblast activation protein S624A cells results in greatly diminished fibroblast activation protein S624A expression and loss of cell surface localization (Fig. 3C and D). This suggests that the enzymatically inactive fibroblast activation protein not only fails to provide the growth advantage of wild-type fibroblast activation protein (as seen in Fig. 2), but that in vivo negative selection occurs with respect to both expression and localization of the enzymatically inactive protein.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Immunohistochemistry of HEK293 xenografts transfected with wild-type or enzymatic mutant fibroblast activation proteins. Immunohistochemical analysis of HEK293-fibroblast activation protein wild-type and HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A xenografts stained with anti–fibroblast activation protein rabbit polyclonal antibodies shows the readily detectable presence of fibroblast activation protein wild-type on the cell membrane of transfected HEK293 cells (A and B, 20x and 40x magnification, respectively), but rare cytoplasmic staining of fibroblast activation protein S624A (C and D, 20x and 40x magnification, respectively). Bar, 50 µm.

 
Inhibition of Fibroblast Activation Protein Enzymatic Activity Is Associated with Growth Attenuation of HT-29 Xenografts That Induce Stromal Expression of Fibroblast Activation Protein
Recombinant murine fibroblast activation protein-extracellular domain was incubated with Val-boroPro prior to the addition of Ala-Pro-AFC as a fluorescent substrate. This yielded in vitro inhibition of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity with an IC50 of 4 x 10–8 mol/L (pH 2) as shown in Fig. 4. This inhibition is pH-dependent, with a significant loss of inhibitory potency at neutral pH, as Val-boroPro remains in linear form at acidic pH, but cyclizes at neutral pH.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. In vitro inhibition of fibroblast activation protein by Val-boroPro. The pH dependence of Val-boroPro in inhibiting fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity is shown using serial dilutions of Val-boroPro in either 0.01 N HCl (pH 2) or neutral reaction buffer (pH 8). Inhibition of fibroblast activation protein DPP enzymatic activity by Val-boroPro was analyzed using a cytofluor fluorimeter and normalized as the percentage of baseline release (without inhibitor) of free AFC by fibroblast activation protein cleavage of the Ala-Pro-AFC substrate. A two-log greater potency of Val-boroPro in acidic pH was seen with a Kd of 4.35 x 10–8 and 4.16 x 10–6 mol/L for pH 2 and pH 8, respectively.

 
Xenografts of the HT-29 colorectal cancer cell line in C.B17/Icr-scid mice induce expression of fibroblast activation protein on host tumor stromal fibroblasts. The HT-29 cell line itself does not express fibroblast activation protein (data not shown), but induces the expression of fibroblast activation protein in the surrounding tumor stroma of HT-29 xenografts as we have previously shown (21). Western analysis using rabbit polyclonal antibodies confirms the expression of murine fibroblast activation protein in the HT-29 xenograft protein lysates. Figure 5 shows the in vivo tumor growth attenuation of HT-29 xenografts treated by gastric gavage with the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor Val-boroPro once daily for 21 consecutive days. On day 24 after inoculation, Val-boroPro-treated animals had a 45% reduction in HT-29 xenograft tumor size compared with normal saline–treated controls (459.0 ± 107.2 mm3 versus 837.0 ± 39.7 mm3, respectively). No obvious toxicities were observed in any of the animals treated with this boronic acid small molecule inhibitor of DPP activity. The degree of in vivo inhibition of fibroblast activation protein DPP activity at the tumor site after treatment with Val-boroPro was also assessed. Tumor protein extracts of HT-29 xenografts from mice treated for 7 days with 50 µg/day of Val-boroPro by gastric gavage were assessed for fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity. Using an immunocapture assay of fibroblast activation protein from these tumors, a 44% inhibition of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity was seen in tumors treated with Val-boroPro compared with normal saline controls (105.5 ± 33.0 versus 194.2 ± 25.9 A.U., respectively; P = 0.046). Representative samples from three mice treated with Val-boroPro show similar expression levels of fibroblast activation protein compared with three control mice as shown in Fig. 5 (bottom). Thus, treatment with Val-boroPro altered the in vivo enzymatic activity, but not the level of fibroblast activation protein expression.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Attenuation of HT-29 xenograft tumor growth by small molecule inhibitor of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity. Tumor volumes of HT-29 colorectal cancer xenografts were assessed weekly in an animal model whereby fibroblast activation protein is induced in the mouse stroma as HT-29 cells themselves are negative for fibroblast activation protein expression. Tumor growth attenuation was seen in mice treated by gastric gavage with 50 µg of the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor Val-boroPro once daily for 21 consecutive days, P = 0.0312. Western analysis (bottom) of proteins extracted from HT-29 xenografts using rabbit polyclonal anti–fibroblast activation protein antibodies show similar levels of fibroblast activation protein expression in both treated and untreated tumors. A protein loading control as assessed by anti-actin antibody was used.

 
Therefore, Val-boroPro treatment inhibits fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity in vitro, and attenuates tumor growth in vivo. In addition, pharmacodynamic assessment of fibroblast activation protein DPP activity in vivo of the HT-29 xenografts shows a reduction of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity at tumor sites, but not fibroblast activation protein expression levels following treatment by Val-boroPro. This was accomplished using a tumor model that recapitulates human epithelial cancer biology, with induction of fibroblast activation protein in the tumor stroma.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The studies reported here show the proof-of-principle that inhibition of the DPP activity of fibroblast activation protein, a stromal selective protein, attenuates the growth of epithelial carcinomas. This extends our previous observation that overexpression of fibroblast activation protein wild-type protein confers a tumor growth advantage by demonstrating that the enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein is responsible for this growth advantage. Transfected HEK293 cells were chosen for study in an animal model due to its modest tumor growth rates, and the ability of these cells to readily express transfected mammalian proteins. Although HEK293 cells are epithelial and not stromal in origin, overexpression of fibroblast activation protein in this model system provides the proof-of-principle of the role of fibroblast activation protein in tumor growth and invasion, and may be akin to clinical cancers characterized by overexpression of fibroblast activation protein in the tumor cell itself as seen in certain sarcomas (13). We also provide evidence of the role of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity in a stromal selective model of fibroblast activation protein using HT-29 colorectal cancer xenografts.

The mechanistic pathway(s) by which fibroblast activation protein potentiates tumor growth is not known, as natural substrates of fibroblast activation protein have not yet been identified. Given the dual enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein as both a DPP and a collagenase, multiple substrates with distinct biological effects may be found. It is tempting to speculate that fibroblast activation protein may degrade extracellular matrix via its collagenase activity, while regulating other hormones through its DPP cleavage of a penultimate alanine or proline. Intriguingly, seprase forms complexes with {alpha}3ß1 integrin in the presence of collagen (27), suggesting that fibroblast activation protein may promote an invasive phenotype through cell adhesion pathways. The dual specificity of fibroblast activation protein for both DPP and collagenase activity utilizes the same serine catalytic site (10), and thus can be targeted for therapeutic effect. Using an enzymatically inactive fibroblast activation protein mutant, we provide the first direct evidence that abrogation of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity in vivo results in tumor growth attenuation of fibroblast activation protein–driven growth.

We find that fibroblast activation protein overexpression potentiates tumor growth that is dependent on this protein's enzymatic activity. This contrasts with a recent report suggesting that fibroblast activation protein may be a tumor suppressor, through mechanisms that are independent of its enzymatic activity, Ramirez-Montagut et al. (28) reported that fibroblast activation protein reexpression by malignant melanoma cells abrogated tumorigenicity, and that this effect was independent of its enzymatic activity. In fact, the enzymatic mutant was a more potent tumor suppressor than wild-type fibroblast activation protein in this melanoma system. One possible explanation for such a disparate set of conclusions is that HEK293 cells are epithelial, whereas melanoma cells have mesenchymal features. Although melanocytes lose fibroblast activation protein expression with malignant transformation, expression of stromal fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity is enhanced in the process of melanoma carcinogenesis (29). We speculate that a negative biological consequence for melanoma cells that express fibroblast activation protein leads to an induction or outsourcing of fibroblast activation protein functions to the surrounding stromal fibroblasts. Thus, normal physiologic processes of fibroblast activation protein that are seen in tadpole tail resorption and wound healing (11, 30, 31) may be usurped in the activated tumor stroma to promote an invasive tumor phenotype. This growth potentiation effect of fibroblast activation protein/seprase was recently independently confirmed in breast cancer (32).

Although the vast majority of epithelial malignancies induce expression of human fibroblast activation protein by tumor stromal fibroblasts, a small proportion of clinical epithelial tumors invade and metastasize independently of fibroblast activation protein. Clearly, factors other than fibroblast activation protein contribute to tumor invasion. Tumor growth independent of fibroblast activation protein expression is seen in fibroblast activation protein–negative tumors, both in the clinic and in the studies reported here. Other stromal factors that participate in tumor growth, or "the company fibroblast activation protein keeps," are the subject of ongoing investigations. We also cannot exclude the possibility that fibroblast activation protein may interact with other proteins that regulate tumor growth independent of its enzymatic activity. Tumor growth rates did not differ between the HEK293 xenografts transfected with either fibroblast activation protein S624A or the empty vector, although there was a slight trend favoring HEK293-fibroblast activation protein S624A compared with HEK293-vector xenografts. Despite these caveats, fibroblast activation protein enzymatic function provides a potentially important new therapeutic target that could be applicable to the therapy of a variety of human malignancies.

Dipeptides containing the {alpha}-amino boronic acid analogue of proline, boroPro, are potent small molecule inhibitors of DPP enzymatic activity (33, 34). These boronic acid compounds are reversible transition state analogues, demonstrating Ki values in the picomolar range (35), and have known in vivo biological effects (36), including antitumor effects (37). The studies reported here show the ability of Val-boroPro to not only inhibit fibroblast activation protein DPP enzymatic activity in vitro, but also partially inhibit fibroblast activation protein DPP enzymatic activity in vivo. This is accompanied by a modest growth attenuation of HT-29 tumors that induce fibroblast activation protein expression in the surrounding stroma. This association between inhibition of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity in vivo and tumor growth attenuation is consistent with the fibroblast activation protein S624A transfection experiments reported here, and supports our hypothesis that inhibition of fibroblast activation protein enzymatic activity attenuates the invasive capabilities of tumors.

Given the ability of Val-boroPro to inhibit the enzymatic activity of both fibroblast activation protein and DPPIV, the relative contributions to tumor growth of dual inhibition of fibroblast activation protein/DPPIV as opposed to fibroblast activation protein–specific effects are unclear. However, a number of lines of evidence suggest that the tumor attenuation effects of Val-boroPro are due to inhibition of fibroblast activation protein and not DPPIV: (a) the biological effects of Val-boroPro on fibroblast activation protein can be seen independent of DPPIV as shown in DPPIV-deficient mice (36); (b) although there is heterodimerization of fibroblast activation protein and DPPIV in human cells, these proteins are uncoupled in mouse cells (28); (c) protein extracts of treated and untreated HT-29 xenografts did not show significant protein levels of DPPIV by Western analysis (data not shown). However, it is possible that Val-boroPro affects other currently unrecognized proteases that participate in tumor growth, and may have biological effects distinct from fibroblast activation protein. Future plans include further delineation of biological effects of fibroblast activation protein–specific inhibition utilizing fibroblast activation protein–selective small molecule or monoclonal antibody inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein. The specificity of monoclonal antibodies for fibroblast activation protein may offer significant advantages in determining fibroblast activation protein's specific contribution to tumor stromagenesis.

In summary, we have shown that fibroblast activation protein overexpression potentiates tumor growth, and abrogation of its enzymatic activity can attenuate fibroblast activation protein-driven tumor growth. This establishes the proof-of-principle that the enzymatic activity of fibroblast activation protein plays an important role in the promotion of tumor growth, and is an attractive target for therapeutics designed to alter fibroblast activation protein-induced tumor growth by targeting its enzymatic activity.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: Supported by grants CA090468, CA103991-01, CA09035-28, the Frank Strick Foundation, the Bernard A. and Rebecca S. Bernard Foundation, and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the American Cancer Society.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

5 http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera Back

Received 10/ 4/04; revised 1/ 6/05; accepted 1/14/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Basset P, Wolf C, Chambon P. Expression of the stromelysin-3 gene in fibroblastic cells of invasive carcinomas of the breast and other human tissues: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993;24:185–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Nielsen BS, Sehested M, Timshel S, Pyke C, Dano K. Messenger RNA for urokinase plasminogen activator is expressed in myofibroblasts adjacent to cancer cells in human breast cancer. Lab Invest 1996;74:168–77.[Medline]
  3. Noel AC, Polette M, Lewalle JM, et al. Coordinate enhancement of gelatinase A mRNA and activity levels in human fibroblasts in response to breast-adenocarcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 1994;56:331–6.[Medline]
  4. Edwards DR, Murphy G. Cancer. Proteases—invasion and more. Nature 1998;394:527–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Dumont N, Arteaga CL. The tumor microenvironment: a potential arbitrator of the tumor suppressive and promoting actions of TGFß. Differentiation 2002;70:574–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Shao ZM, Nguyen M, Barsky SH. Human breast carcinoma desmoplasia is PDGF initiated. Oncogene 2000;19:4337–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Koliopanos A, Friess H, di Mola FF, et al. Connective tissue growth factor gene expression alters tumor progression in esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2002;26:420–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ruiter D, Bogenrieder T, Elder D, Herlyn M. Melanoma-stroma interactions: structural and functional aspects. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:35–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Scanlan MJ, Raj BK, Calvo B, et al. Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein {alpha}, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:5657–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Park JE, Lenter MC, Zimmermann RN, Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 1999;274:36505–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Cell surface glycoprotein of reactive stromal fibroblasts as a potential antibody target in human epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:7235–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Levy MT, McCaughan GW, Marinos G, Gorrell MD. Intrahepatic expression of the hepatic stellate cell marker fibroblast activation protein correlates with the degree of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infection. Liver 2002;22:93–101.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Rettig WJ, Garin-Chesa P, Beresford HR, Oettgen HF, Melamed MR, Old LJ. Cell-surface glycoproteins of human sarcomas: differential expression in normal and malignant tissues and cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;85:3110–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Goldstein LA, Ghersi G, Pineiro-Sanchez ML, et al. Molecular cloning of seprase: a serine integral membrane protease from human melanoma. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1361:11–9.[Medline]
  15. Goodman JD, Rozypal TL, Kelly T. Seprase, a membrane-bound protease, alleviates the serum growth requirement of human breast cancer cells. Clin Exp Metastasis 2003;20:459–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Jin X, Iwasa S, Okada K, Mitsumata M, Ooi A. Expression patterns of seprase, a membrane serine protease, in cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Anticancer Res 2003;23:3195–8.[Medline]
  17. Iwasa S, Jin X, Okada K, Mitsumata M, Ooi A. Increased expression of seprase, a membrane-type serine protease, is associated with lymph node metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett 2003;199:91–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Ariga N, Sato E, Ohuchi N, Nagura H, Ohtani H. Stromal expression of fibroblast activation protein/seprase, a cell membrane serine proteinase and gelatinase, is associated with longer survival in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. Int J Cancer 2001;95:67–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Welt S, Divgi CR, Scott AM, et al. Antibody targeting in metastatic colon cancer: a phase I study of monoclonal antibody F19 against a cell-surface protein of reactive tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:1193–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Niedermeyer J, Scanlan MJ, Garin-Chesa P, et al. Mouse fibroblast activation protein: molecular cloning, alternative splicing and expression in the reactive stroma of epithelial cancers. Int J Cancer 1997;71:383–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Cheng JD, Dunbrack RL Jr., Valianou M, Rogatko A, Alpaugh RK, Weiner LM. Promotion of tumor growth by murine fibroblast activation protein, a serine protease, in an animal model. Cancer Res 2002;62:4767–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Engel M, Hoffmann T, Wagner L, et al. The crystal structure of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26) reveals its functional regulation and enzymatic mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:5063–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389–402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003;12:2001–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:7432–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Huang CC, Couch GS, Pettersen EF, Ferrin TE. Chimera: an extensible molecular modeling application constructed using standard components. Pac Symp Biocomput 1996;1:724.
  27. Mueller SC, Ghersi G, Akiyama SK, et al. A novel protease-docking function of integrin at invadopodia. J Biol Chem 1999;274:24947–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ramirez-Montagut T, Blachere NE, Sviderskaya EV, et al. FAP{alpha}, a surface peptidase expressed during wound healing, is a tumor suppressor. Oncogene 2004;23:5435–46.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Huber MA, Kraut N, Park JE, et al. Fibroblast activation protein: differential expression and serine protease activity in reactive stromal fibroblasts of melanocytic skin tumors. J Invest Dermatol 2003;120:182–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Brown DD, Wang Z, Furlow JD, et al. The thyroid hormone-induced tail resorption program during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:1924–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Berry DL, Rose CS, Remo BF, Brown DD. The expression pattern of thyroid hormone response genes in remodeling tadpole tissues defines distinct growth and resorption gene expression programs. Dev Biol 1998;203:24–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Huang Y, Wang S, Kelly T. Seprase promotes rapid tumor growth and increased microvessel density in a mouse model of human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2004;64:2712–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Flentke GR, Munoz E, Huber BT, Plaut AG, Kettner CA, Bachovchin WW. Inhibition of dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV (DP-IV) by Xaa-boroPro dipeptides and use of these inhibitors to examine the role of DP-IV in T-cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:1556–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bachovchin WW, Plaut AG, Flentke GR, Lynch M, Kettner CA. Inhibition of IgA1 proteinases from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae by peptide prolyl boronic acids. J Biol Chem 1990;265:3738–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gutheil WG, Bachovchin WW. Separation of L-Pro-DL-boroPro into its component diastereomers and kinetic analysis of their inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV. A new method for the analysis of slow, tight-binding inhibition. Biochemistry 1993;32:8723–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Jones B, Adams S, Miller GT, Jesson MI, Watanabe T, Wallner BP. Hematopoietic stimulation by a dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor reveals a novel regulatory mechanism and therapeutic treatment for blood cell deficiencies. Blood 2003;102:1641–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Adams S, Miller GT, Jesson MI, Watanabe T, Jones B, Wallner BP. PT-100, a small molecule dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor, has potent antitumor effects and augments antibody-mediated cytotoxicity via a novel immune mechanism. Cancer Res 2004;64:5471–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. R. Henry, H.-O. Lee, J. S. Lee, A. Klein-Szanto, P. Watts, E. A. Ross, W.-T. Chen, and J. D. Cheng
Clinical Implications of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Patients with Colon Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 13(6): 1736 - 1741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
D. Chen, A. Kennedy, J.-Y. Wang, W. Zeng, Q. Zhao, M. Pearl, M. Zhang, Z. Suo, J. M. Nesland, Y. Qiao, et al.
Activation of EDTA-Resistant Gelatinases in Malignant Human Tumors.
Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 9977 - 9985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Y. Edosada, C. Quan, C. Wiesmann, T. Tran, D. Sutherlin, M. Reynolds, J. M. Elliott, H. Raab, W. Fairbrother, and B. B. Wolf
Selective Inhibition of Fibroblast Activation Protein Protease Based on Dipeptide Substrate Specificity
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7437 - 7444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, L. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online