Molecular Cancer Therapeutics CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, N. H.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:103-110
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Characterization of programmed cell death 4 in multiple human cancers reveals a novel enhancer of drug sensitivity

Aaron P. Jansen, Corinne E. Camalier, Cristi Stark and Nancy H. Colburn

Gene Regulation Section, Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD

Requests for Reprints:Aaron P. Jansen, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Building 567, Room 187, Frederick, MD 21702. Phone: (301) 846-6850; Fax: (301) 846-6907. E-mail:ajansen{at}ncifcrf.gov

Abstract

Programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4), originally identified as an inhibitor of murine cellular transformation, inhibits protein synthesis by directly interacting with eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) of the translation initiation complex. The relevance of Pdcd4 to a broad range of human cancers derived from multiple tissue sites is unknown. Protein expression patterns from the National Cancer Institute drug-screening panel of 60 human cancer cells (NCI60) were analyzed by Western blot methods and revealed frequent reduction of Pdcd4 protein levels in renal-, lung-, and glia-derived tumors. Greater than mean Pdcd4 protein levels correlated with the antitumor activity of geldanamycin and tamoxifen. Stable expression of antisense PDCD4 significantly reduced the sensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to geldanamycin and to tamoxifen. Sensitivity to geldanamycin significantly increased in UO-31 renal cancer cells expressing sense PDCD4 cDNA. Increased geldanamycin sensitivity was accompanied by enhanced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. One primary mode of inactivation of Pdcd4 in human cancers appears to involve down-regulated expression, and this down-regulation causes a decreased sensitivity to geldanamycin cytotoxicity. Thus, up-regulating Pdcd4 expression may be promising for geldanamycin-based combination therapy.

Introduction

The progression of a tumor from an early benign lesion to metastatic cancer is not fully understood. Hence, molecular signatures for stages of progression are being sought to identify and validate new molecular targets for cancer prevention and treatment. In the murine JB6 cell model system, programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4) inhibits tumor promoter-induced neoplastic transformation and transformation-required transactivation of the activator protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factor complex, but does not inhibit other transformation-required events such as NF-{kappa}B or ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activation (1). A number of AP-1 target genes have been implicated in cellular invasion and metastatic progression, including urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and various matrix metalloproteinase family members (2–4). Although Pdcd4 prevents murine cellular transformation, the function of PDCD4 in human cancer is unknown.

PDCD4, cloned after differential display analysis of murine JB6 variants, is highly expressed in transformation resistant (P–) but not in transformation susceptible (P+) cells or transformed (Tx) cells (5, 6). Reducing Pdcd4 protein levels in P– cells by antisense RNA expression is accompanied by acquisition of a transformation susceptible phenotype, indicating that reduction of Pdcd4 protein is sufficient to permit neoplastic transformation (5). Ectopic expression of PDCD4 in stably transfected P+ cells renders them resistant to tumor promoter-induced transformation, indicating that elevated expression of Pdcd4 protein inhibits neoplastic transformation (1). Pdcd4 down-regulation is also necessary to maintain the tumor phenotype, since elevation of Pdcd4 expression suppresses Tx tumor phenotype (6).

Pdcd4 directly interacts with and inhibits the helicase activity of eIF4A and inhibits cap-dependent translation both in vitro and in vivo, while competing for binding of eIF4A to the scaffold protein eIF4G (7). Pdcd4 also binds eIF4G, independently of interacting with eIF4A (7). Although the consequence of eIF4G binding remains to be determined, Pdcd4 is the first example of a protein that inhibits translation through attenuation of eIF4A activity. Inhibition of AP-1 is sufficient to inhibit tumor promotion in the JB6 cell model, in a human keratinocyte progression series, and in mice (1, 5, 8). A Pdcd4 mutant that fails to bind and inhibit eIF4A helicase activity also fails to inhibit tumor promoter-induced AP-1 activity (7). The lack of eIF4A binding by a mutant Pdcd4 releases the Pdcd4-specific inhibition of translation and the inhibition of AP-1 activation required for neoplastic transformation. Several human tumors and tumor cell lines show elevated levels of translation initiation factors including eIF4A (9), eIF4E (10), and eIF4G (11). Therefore, Pdcd4-based inhibitory regulation of translation factors may negatively regulate human cancer development.

The cellular transformation inhibition function of PDCD4 (1, 5) renders PDCD4 a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes are necessary for the development of cancer (12–14). In addition to alterations in upstream regulators or downstream effectors, tumor suppressor genes can be directly inactivated by alteration of the genomic sequence or down-regulation of the tumor suppressor gene product expression. To ascertain the relevance of PDCD4 to human cancer, protein levels were assessed in the National Cancer Institute drug-screening panel of 60 human cancer cells (NCI60). The hypothesis tested was that Pdcd4 protein levels would be prognostic or causal for antitumor activity of current or exploratory chemotherapeutic compounds. Measurement of Pdcd4 protein levels supported the hypothesis. Pdcd4 was found to contribute to the sensitivity to geldanamycin of MCF-7 breast cancer cells and UO-31 renal cancer cells. Thus, Pdcd4 levels are predictive for and contributory to geldanamycin responsiveness.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals
Tamoxifen and geldanamycin were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Ascomycin was purchased from BIOMOL Research Labs (Plymouth Meeting, PA).

Cell Lines
Dr. D. Scudiero of the Developmental Therapeutics Program (DTP), NCI, provided exponentially growing NCI60 cells (15). To produce MCF-7 cells with reduced Pdcd4 protein levels, the MCF-7 cells were stably transfected with pMM-antisense PDCD4 plasmid or pMM-control as described previously (5) and independently derived antisense clones 29as, 40as, and 57as and control clone 23c were generated. Pooled clones of UO-31 cells ectopically expressing pCMV-PDCD4 or pCMV-control were generated for cell proliferation assays, cycle analysis, and TUNEL assays.

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis
Cell pellets from the NCI60 cells were lysed in 10 mM Tris/0.1% SDS lysis buffer plus protease inhibitors. Cellular extracts were quantitated in triplicate using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Samples were randomized and loaded onto gels with the melanoma line, SK-MEL-2, used as a reference for Pdcd4 expression compensating for variations in film exposure. Protein extracts (10 µg/lane) were fractionated (10% SDS-PAGE). After transfer to nitrocellulose membrane, immunoblot analysis was performed with rabbit Pdcd4 antibody (1:5000). A Pdcd4 carboxyl-terminal domain peptide was used to generate rabbit antiserum (CFVSEGDGGRLKPESY-OH). Anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was visualized with ECL (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) after multiple exposures to XAR5 Scientific Imaging Film (0, Rochester, NY). The density of the bands was determined by using 1D Image Analysis Software (Kodak). The mean intensity of Pdcd4 expression for all the cell lines was assigned a value of zero.

The linear range of the X-ray film was determined by immunoblotting GST-Pdcd4 recombinant protein (0.1, 1.0, 5.0, 10, and 50 ng). If linearity was observed, the sum intensity of pixels from the X-ray film was determined. At least two blots were performed per tissue group to confirm the findings.

COMPARE Analysis
A molecular targets version of the COMPARE program (16–20) was used to analyze relationships between basal patterns of Pdcd4 protein levels and drug sensitivity in the NCI60 cells. The Pdcd4 protein levels were represented as a mean-graph pattern, which was used as a seed to derive correlations between Pdcd4 protein levels and growth inhibitory properties of compounds in multiple databases, including the Standard Agent database, which comprises 170 chemical compounds including both preclinical and clinical drugs with antitumor properties. Agents were ranked according to Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and two-tailed P value. Using Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons in the 170-compound Standard Agent database, statistical significance was conferred to P values less than 0.0006.

Cell Proliferation Assay
Cell proliferation was assessed using colorimetric XTT assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) according to manufacturer's instructions. Cells were plated in 96-well plates at 2500 cells/well. After 24 h to allow for cell adherence, cells were treated with drug or solvent control for 72 h as described for individual experiments. Colorimetric change was measured in a scanning multi-well spectrophotometer.

Flow Cytometry
Cell cycle distribution conferred by DNA histograms was generated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (21) after propidium iodide staining with a Coulter XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and analyzed with MultiPlus (Phoenix Flow System, San Diego, CA). Determination of fluorescently labeled TUNEL-positive cells (Roche Diagnostics) was assayed 72 h after drug treatment using flow cytometry.

Results

Pdcd4 Protein Levels in the NCI Panel of Tumor Cell Lines
Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes occurs not only through gene mutation or deletion but alternatively as a result of reduced gene expression (22, 23). To determine phenotypic alterations associated with loss of Pdcd4 function, the protein expression pattern of the PDCD4 gene in multiple human tumors was examined by Western blot analysis of the NCI60 human cancer cell panel. Pdcd4 localized predominantly to the cytoplasm under conditions of asynchronous cell growth, confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis of JB6 cells (7). The Pdcd4 band was determined to be Mr 54,000 and was competed by prior incubation of the Pdcd4 antibody with a peptide based on the Pdcd4 carboxyl-terminal domain, which was originally used to generate rabbit antiserum (Fig. 1A). In a small subset of cells, a band at Mr 46,000–48,000 kDa was also competed by the Pdcd4-specific peptide. Despite the lack of direct evidence, this band had been speculated to be a degradation product (24). However, there was no correlation between loss of the Mr 54,000 species of Pdcd4 and presence of the putative degradation product.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Pdcd4 protein levels in the NCI panel of tumor cell lines. A, panel 1 is a representative example of immunoblot data from whole cell extract for several human tumor cell lines using rabbit polyclonal Pdcd4 antibody. Panel 2 is an anti-Pdcd4 immunoblot with the same extracts and the antibody previously incubated with Pdcd4 carboxyl-terminal peptide (+ peptide) used to generate antiserum. See Materials and Methods for peptide sequence. Each well contains equal protein. B, graphical summary of Pdcd4 protein levels in the form of a mean graph of the NCI60 cells. Expression above the mean Pdcd4 protein levels is drawn to the right of the centerline and below the mean is drawn to the left. The melanoma line, SK-MEL-2, was loaded onto every gel for normalization. The protein expression patterns were determined in duplicate.

 
Pdcd4 protein levels, displayed in mean-graph format (16), showed patterns in a number of tissue types (Fig. 1B). Five of six cancer cell lines derived from the central nervous system (CNS) tumors showed complete loss of Pdcd4 protein. Immmunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that Pdcd4 was readily detected in brain tissue under normal conditions (data not shown). A pattern of less than mean Pdcd4 protein levels was seen in eight of nine non-small cell lung cancer lines and five of seven renal cancer cell lines. However, seven of eight melanoma lines displayed a pattern of greater than mean expression of Pdcd4 protein. Thus, the human cancer sites in which the cell lines showed most frequent reduction in Pdcd4 protein expression were derived from lung, glia, and the CNS.

Greater Than Mean Levels of Pdcd4 Are Predictive for Specific Drug Sensitivity in the NCI60 Cancer Cell Panel
We hypothesized that Pdcd4 expression level status may be a marker in the response of some human cancers to current and potential chemotherapeutic drugs. The protein levels of Pdcd4 in NCI60 cells were compared with in vitro chemosensitivity data for over 100,000 compounds using the NCI Developmental Therapeutics Program COMPARE statistical algorithm. The COMPARE program was used to create Wilcoxon rank-order analyses to determine whether either positive or negative correlations exist for the 50% growth inhibition pattern of drugs compared to molecular target of interest, Pdcd4. In the Standard Agents category consisting of 170 compounds under current clinical and investigative use as chemotherapeutic drugs, expression of greater than mean levels of Pdcd4 protein in the NCI60 cells resulted in significantly positive rank-order correlations to geldanamycin and tamoxifen (Table 1). Analysis of the Selected 3000 Agent Database revealed a clustering of elevated Pdcd4 protein levels and the activity of compounds with mechanisms that included inhibition of Hsp90 or inhibition of cis/trans peptidyl prolyl isomerase (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Correlation of Pdcd4 protein levels with 50% growth inhibition data from the NCI60 human tumor panel

 
Table 2 provides a comparison of Pdcd4 protein levels to the published PDCD4 gene expression levels determined by microarray analysis of the NCI60 cells (25, 26). Note that gene expression levels and protein levels correlate highly in tissues such as lung, colon, and breast. However, in the renal- or CNS-derived cell lines, there is a lack of correlation between transcript levels and protein levels. This suggests that the regulation of Pdcd4 is primarily transcriptional or pretranslational in lung, colon, and breast cancer, but both transcriptional and translational regulation may occur in renal and CNS cancers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Relative levels of Pdcd4 protein and mRNA in NCI60

 
Pdcd4 Protein Level Contributes to Cellular Sensitivity to Tamoxifen and Geldanamycin, but not to Ascomycin
To test the causal hypothesis that above-mean Pdcd4 protein level not only predicted but also contributed to sensitivity to the drugs predicted by the above COMPARE analysis, we derived MCF-7 cells having stable expression of PDCD4 antisense RNA, and consequently down-regulated Pdcd4 protein levels. PDCD4 antisense clones 29 (29as), 40 (40as), and 57 (57as) displayed reductions in endogenous Pdcd4 protein levels of 50%, 80%, and 90%, respectively, compared to either the parental MCF-7 or vector control MCF-7 clone (23c) (Fig. 2A). No changes in cell growth or global protein expression were noted (data not shown). The IC50 of tamoxifen in whole serum, in which the cytotoxicity of tamoxifen was not reversed by increasing estrogen levels, was increased in a small but reproducible manner from 12.5 µM in parental and control cells to 15 µM in PDCD4 antisense expressing cells (Fig. 2B). The observation of no additional shift in sensitivity with 80–90% reduction in Pdcd4 levels suggests that a reduction of endogenous Pdcd4 protein levels by 50% (seen in clone 29as) may be a threshold for decreased sensitivity to tamoxifen. The IC50 of geldanamycin was increased from 100 nM as determined in parental and control MCF-7 cells to greater than 1 µM in PDCD4 antisense expressing lines (Fig. 2C). Doses above 500 nM were utilized to determine actual IC50 for the PDCD4 antisense clones (Data not shown). However, for geldanamycin, in contrast to tamoxifen, 90% reduction of Pdcd4 had a greater effect than 50% reduction of Pdcd4 protein levels. No change in sensitivity to ascomycin, an inhibitor of peptidyl prolyl isomerase, was seen (Fig. 2D). The reduction of Pdcd4 caused a significant decrease in the sensitivity to geldanamycin.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Pdcd4 protein levels contribute to sensitivity of MCF-7 cells to tamoxifen and geldanamycin. A, antisense expression reduces Pdcd4 protein levels in independent MCF-7 cell line clones (29AS, 40AS, 57AS) compared to parental and vector control (23C) cell lines. Immunoblotting was performed as described in Fig. 1. B–D, evaluation of chemosensitivity of MCF-7 clones expressing Pdcd4 antisense construct. All cell lines were incubated with indicated concentrations for 72 h with tamoxifen, geldanamycin, ascomycin, or solvent alone. Cell proliferation determined by XTT assay was expressed as a percentage of the vehicle-treated control. Each value is the mean ± SD of eight replicate treatments in a 96-well tissue culture format. Graphs are representative of three independent experiments for tamoxifen and geldanamycin treatments and two independent experiments for ascomycin treatment. {diamondsuit}, MCF-7; {blacksquare}, 23C; {triangleup}, 29AS; {square}, 40AS; {lozenge}, 57AS.

 
To further test whether Pdcd4 protein levels altered sensitivity to geldanamycin, the UO-31 renal cancer cell line, which contained low Pdcd4 protein amount and showed insensitivity to geldanamycin, was chosen to express sense PDCD4 cDNA. Pooled clones were generated and Pdcd4 protein levels were increased by 2.4 fold in the pooled clones compared to either parental or vector alone UO-31 cells (Fig. 3A). No changes in cell growth or global protein expression were noted (data not shown). The IC50 of geldanamycin was decreased from 400 nM as determined in parental and control UO-31 cells to 140 nM in PDCD4 sense expressing pooled clones (Fig. 3B). The data further confirmed the causal contribution of Pdcd4 protein levels to geldanamycin sensitivity.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Pdcd4 protein levels contribute to sensitivity of UO-31 cells to geldanamycin. A, ectopic sense PDCD4 expression increases relative Pdcd4 protein levels in UO-31 pooled clones compared to parental and vector control cell lines. Immunoblotting was performed as described in Fig. 1. B, evaluation of chemosensitivity of UO-31 pooled clones expressing PDCD4 sense construct. All lines were incubated with indicated concentrations for 72 h with geldanamycin or solvent alone. Cell proliferation determined by XTT assay was expressed as a percentage of the vehicle-treated control. Each value is the mean ± SD of eight replicate treatments in a 96-well tissue culture format. The graph is representative of two independent experiments for geldanamycin treatment.

 
Pdcd4 Enhances Geldanamycin-Induced G2-M Arrest in the Low Rb Expressing Renal Cancer Cell Line UO-31
To determine whether the enhancement of geldanamycin-induced growth inhibition by Pdcd4 was attributable to inhibition of cell proliferation alone or to a combination of both growth arrest and induction of cell death, DNA content and cell cycle status were determined in UO-31 renal carcinoma cells. Pdcd4-expressing pooled clones responded to 24 h geldanamycin treatment (250 nM) with an accumulation of cells in G2-M phase of the cell cycle (DMSO: 16.1%; geldanamycin: 33.7%). Vector alone expressing clones were unresponsive to geldanamycin and continued to proliferate (DMSO: 9.9%, geldanamycin: 15.0%) (Fig. 4A). Pdcd4 expression increased hypodiploid cells in sub-G1 fraction and increased TUNEL-positive cells 72 h after geldanamycin treatment compared to vector alone expressing clones (Fig. 4B). Thus, together, Pdcd4 and geldanamycin induced G2-M arrest accompanied by apoptosis.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Elevated Pdcd4 protein levels enhance geldanamycin-induced G2-M arrest and apoptosis in UO-31 cells. A, cell cycle analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorter after 24 h of geldanamycin (250 nM) treatment with UO-31 control and PDCD4 pooled clones. Data are representative of three experiments. B, analysis of sub-G1 fraction from cell cycle analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorter after 72 h of geldanamycin (1000 nM) treatment. Fold increase in apoptotic cells was determined after fluorescently labeled TUNEL and analysis by flow cytometry. X axis: DNA content; Y axis: cell number. Data are representative of two experiments.

 
Discussion

The present study demonstrates that the murine transformation inhibitor and candidate human tumor suppressor gene, PDCD4, is down-regulated at the protein level in a number of human cancers. This down-regulation not only is a marker of drug sensitivity, but also contributes to the decreased sensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to tamoxifen and geldanamycin and of UO-31 renal cancer cells to geldanamycin. Therapeutic strategies to up-regulate Pdcd4 expression in combination with geldanamycin treatment may offer promise.

With the characterization of the NCI60 tumor cell panel, this report establishes that in human cancer, one mode of inactivation of the candidate tumor suppressor gene PDCD4 involves down-regulated protein levels. PDCD4 may be a candidate for haplo-insufficiency or dominant loss of allele and function. Thresholds of protein function appear to be important for at least two tumor suppressor genes, p27Kip1 and p53. Evidence suggests that mice hemizygous for either p27Kip1 (27) or p53 (28) are predisposed to tumor development compared to wild-type mice. To directly answer whether haplo-insufficiency of Pdcd4 protein causes a greater susceptibility to tumor development in vivo, the generation PDCD4 hemizygous and nullizygous mice is currently being pursued.

The mechanism by which Pdcd4 is down-regulated remains unknown. However, at least one mechanism of regulation appears to occur at a pretranslational, possibly transcriptional level. PDCD4 transcript levels were altered in a number of physiological circumstances in both mouse and human cells (29–32). Conflicting evidence exists as to whether the PDCD4 transcript is up- or down-regulated in response to differing physiological stimuli, especially apoptotic induction. Expression of the PDCD4 transcript is up-regulated on induction of apoptosis in a number of model systems (29) and in senescent human diploid fibroblasts (33). However, treatment of mouse lymphoma cells with topoisomerase inhibitors, which induce apoptosis, down-regulates the PDCD4 transcript (34). No causal relationship has been attributed to the changes in PDCD4 transcript levels and apoptosis.

Interestingly, the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) plays a part in the therapeutic mechanisms of both geldanamycin and tamoxifen, suggesting that Pdcd4 may play a role in regulating targets of Hsp90. Geldanamycin binds to a conserved pocket of Hsp90 (35–37). The binding releases its chaperone protection allowing the degradation of a number of oncogenes or mutated tumor suppressors, including receptor tyrosine kinases (38), steroid receptors (39), Raf (40), and p53 (41). Tamoxifen is an antiestrogenic drug widely used for adjuvant chemotherapy for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. The concentration of tamoxifen necessary for the antiproliferation effect appears to be in the range that is not reversible by adding estrogen. This further suggests that the alteration of tamoxifen sensitivity by Pdcd4 may be through an Hsp90 pathway rather than through an estrogen receptor pathway. It appears unlikely that geldanamycin may bind to Pdcd4. However, we cannot distinguish between the two possibilities that Pdcd4 may act on the Hsp90 pathway or another pathway that may synergize the geldanamycin activity, possibly transforming geldanamycin from a cytostatic agent to a cytotoxic agent. It will be of interest to determine whether Pdcd4 may be a useful molecular marker to better identify breast cancer patients who will respond to tamoxifen with prolonged survival and whether the loss of Pdcd4 alters response to geldanamycin or tamoxifen in vivo. Recently, the loss of Pdcd4 expression in human lung adenocarcinoma has been reported and correlates with tumor progression and poor patient prognosis (42). A similar study of breast cancer tissue may be warranted.

We chose to follow up the down-regulation findings of geldanamycin in the MCF-7 cells with a tumor cell line that matched two criteria: (a) deficiency in Pdcd4 expression and (b) decreased sensitivity to geldanamycin in comparison to the other NCI60 cells. UO-31 renal cancer cells met both requirements. We also chose to further study geldanamycin because of the correlation between compounds that inhibited Hsp90 activity and Pdcd4 protein levels. Because renal cell cancer is refractory to standard chemotherapeutic agents, novel experimental chemotherapeutics are being sought to address deficiencies in current chemotherapy regimens against renal cancer. geldanamycin is known to cause RB-dependent G1 cell cycle arrest (43). However, in breast cancer cells deficient for RB function, geldanamycin causes G2-M arrest (44). UO-31 cells have relatively low levels of RB protein compared to other cell lines of the NCI60 drug screening database (http://dtp.nci.nih.gov) and are resistant to geldanamycin. However, when Pdcd4 is introduced, the UO-31 cells become more sensitive to G2-M-associated arrest and present evidence of apoptosis after geldanamycin treatment. Thus, the combination of Pdcd4 expression and geldanamycin treatment causes UO-31 cells to respond. Pdcd4 may play a role in driving apoptosis in cells with inhibited Hsp90 chaperone activity. The relationship between Hsp90, Pdcd4, and apoptosis remains unclear. However, better understanding of the function of Pdcd4 itself may lead to development of new drugs that take advantage of the molecular mechanism(s) by which Pdcd4 inhibits tumor development.

In conclusion, these findings establish that Pdcd4 protein levels are significantly correlated and specifically contribute to the antitumor activities of tamoxifen and especially to geldanamycin. At least one primary mode of inactivation of Pdcd4 involves down-regulation of constitutive protein levels. Further understanding of the role Pdcd4 plays in tumor development may provide new tools for cancer prevention and control.

Acknowledgments

The NCI60 cell pellets were generously provided by Dr. Dominic Scudiero and the MCF-7 cell line for antisense analysis was kindly provided by Dr. Esta Sterneck. Dr. Susan Holbeck facilitated the COMPARE analysis. Refika Turnier provided technical service for cell flow cytometry analysis. Ruth Bushnell provided additional technical service.

Footnotes

Note:The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 9/17/03; revised 11/18/03; accepted 11/26/04.

References

  1. Yang H-S, Jansen AP, Nair R, Shibara K, Verma AK, Cmarik JL, et al. A novel transformation suppressor, Pdcd4, inhibits AP-1 transactivation but not NF-kB or ODC transactivation. Oncogene, 2001;20:669–76.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Wang Y. The role and regulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor gene expression in cancer invasion and metastasis. Med Res Rev, 2001;21:146–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Matrisian LM, McDonnell S, Miller DB, Navre M, Seftor EA, Hendrix MJ. The role of the matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin in the progression of squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Med Sci, 1991;302:157–62.[Medline]
  4. Westermarck J, Kahari VM. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in tumor invasion. FASEB J, 1999;13:781–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cmarik JL, Min H, Hegamyer G, Zhan S, Kulesz-Martin M, Yoshinaga H, et al. Differentially expressed protein Pdcd4 inhibits tumor promoter-induced neoplastic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999;96:14037–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Yang HS, Knies JL, Stark C, Colburn NH. Pdcd4 suppresses tumor phenotype in JB6 cells by inhibiting AP-1 transactivation. Oncogene, 2003;22:3712–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Yang HS, Jansen AP, Komar AA, Zheng X, Merrick WC, Costes S, et al. The transformation suppressor Pdcd4 is a novel eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A binding protein that inhibits translation. Mol Cell Biol, 2003;23:26–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Young MR, Li JJ, Rincon M, Flavell RA, Sathyanarayana BK, Hunziker R, et al. Transgenic mice demonstrate AP-1 (activator protein-1) transactivation is required for tumor promotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999;96:9827–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Eberle J, Krasagakis K, Orfanos CE. Translation initiation factor eIF-4A1 mRNA is consistently overexpressed in human melanoma cells in vitro Int J Cancer, 1997;71:396–401.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. De Benedetti A, Harris AL. eIF4E expression in tumors: its possible role in progression of malignancies. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 1999;31:59–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Bauer C, Diesinger I, Brass N, Steinhart H, Iro H, Meese EU. Translation initiation factor eIF-4G is immunogenic, overexpressed, and amplified in patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma. Cancer, 2001;92:822–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell, 1990;61:759–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. The multistep nature of cancer. Trends Genet, 1993;9:138–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell, 2000;100:57–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P, Shoemaker R, Paull K, Vistica D, et al. Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1991;83:757–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Paull KD, Shoemaker RH, Hodes L, Monks A, Scudiero DA, Rubinstein L, et al. Display and analysis of patterns of differential activity of drugs against human tumor cell lines: development of mean graph and COMPARE algorithm. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1989;81:1088–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Paull KD, Lin CM, Malspeis L, Hamel E. Identification of novel antimitotic agents acting at the tubulin level by computer-assisted evaluation of differential cytotoxicity data. Cancer Res, 1992;52:3892–900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Boyd M, Paull K, Rubinstein L, editors. Data display and analysis strategies for the NCI disease oriented in-vitro antitumor drug screen. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992. p. 11–34.
  19. Lee JS, Paull K, Alvarez M, Hose C, Monks A, Grever M, et al. Rhodamine efflux patterns predict P-glycoprotein substrates in the National Cancer Institute drug screen. Mol Pharmacol, 1994;46:627–38.[Abstract]
  20. Monks A, Scudiero DA, Johnson GS, Paull KD, Sausville EA. The NCI anti-cancer drug screen: a smart screen to identify effectors of novel targets. Anticancer Drug Des, 1997;12:533–41.[Medline]
  21. Nusse M, Beisker W, Hoffmann C, Tarnok A. Flow cytometric analysis of G1- and G2/M-phase subpopulations in mammalian cell nuclei using side scatter and DNA content measurements. Cytometry, 1990;11:813–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Macleod K. Tumor suppressor genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2000;10:81–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Quon KC, Berns A. Haplo-insufficiency? Let me count the ways. Genes Dev, 2001;15:2917–21.[Free Full Text]
  24. Yoshinaga H, Matsuhashi S, Fujiyama C, Masaki Z. Novel human PDCD4(H731) gene expressed in proliferative cells is expressed in the small duct epithelial cells of the breast as revealed by an anti-H731 antibody. Pathol Int, 1999;49:1067–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, Perou CM, Rees C, Spellman P, et al. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet, 2000;24:227–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Scherf U, Ross DT, Waltham M, Smith LH, Lee JK, Tanabe L, et al. A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nat Genet, 2000;24:236–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Fero ML, Randel E, Gurley KE, Roberts JM, Kemp CJ. The murine gene p27Kip1 is haplo-insufficient for tumour suppression. Nature, 1998;396:177–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Venkatachalam S, Shi YP, Jones SN, Vogel H, Bradley A, Pinkel D, et al. Retention of wild-type p53 in tumors from p53 heterozygous mice: reduction of p53 dosage can promote cancer formation. EMBO J, 1998;17:4657–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Shibahara K, Asano M, Ishida Y, Aoki T, Koike T, Honjo T. Isolation of a novel mouse gene MA-3 that is induced upon programmed cell death. Gene, 1995;166:297–301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Onishi Y, Kizaki H. Molecular cloning of the genes suppressed in RVC lymphoma cells by topoisomerase inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1996;228:7–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Matsuhashi S, Yoshinaga H, Yatsuki H, Tsugita A, Hori K. Isolation of a novel gene from a human cell line with Pr-28 MAb which recognizes a nuclear antigen involved in the cell cycle. Res Commun Biochem Cell Mol Biol, 1997;1:109–20.
  32. Azzoni L, Zatsepina O, Abede B, Bennett IM, Kanakaraj P, Perussia B. Differential transcriptional regulation of CD161 and a novel gene, 197/15a, by IL-2, IL-15, and IL-12 in NK and T cells. J Immunol, 1998;161:3493–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kang MJ, Ahn HS, Lee JY, Matsuhashi S, Park WY. Up-regulation of PDCD4 in senescent human diploid fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2002;293:617–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Onishi Y, Hashimoto S, Kizaki H. Cloning of the TIS gene suppressed by topoisomerase inhibitors. Gene, 1998;215:453–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. An WG, Schulte TW, Neckers LM. The heat shock protein 90 antagonist geldanamycin alters chaperone association with p210bcr-abl and v-src proteins before their degradation by the proteasome. Cell Growth & Differ, 2000;11:355–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Shiotsu Y, Neckers LM, Wortman I, An WG, Schulte TW, Soga S, et al. Novel oxime derivatives of radicicol induce erythroid differentiation associated with preferential G(1) phase accumulation against chronic myelogenous leukemia cells through destabilization of Bcr-Abl with Hsp90 complex. Blood, 2000;96:2284–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gorre ME, Ellwood-Yen K, Chiosis G, Rosen N, Sawyers CL. BCR-ABL point mutants isolated from patients with imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia remain sensitive to inhibitors of the BCR-ABL chaperone heat shock protein 90. Blood, 2002;100:3041–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Mimnaugh EG, Chavany C, Neckers L. Polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the p185c-erbB-2 receptor protein-tyrosine kinase induced by geldanamycin. J Biol Chem, 1996;271:22796–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Baulieu EE, Binart N, Cadepond F, Catelli MG, Chambraud B, Garnier JM, et al. Thyroid hormone receptor family and gene regulation. In: Gustafsson JA, Eriksson H, Carlstedt-Duke J, editors. The steroid. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989. p. 301–18.
  40. Schulte TW, An WG, Neckers LM. Geldanamycin-induced destabilization of Raf-1 involves the proteasome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1997;239:655–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Whitesell L, Sutphin P, An WG, Schulte T, Blagosklonny MV, Neckers L. Geldanamycin-stimulated destabilization of mutated p53 is mediated by the proteasome in vivo Oncogene, 1997;14:2809–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Chen Y, Knosel T, Kristiansen G, Pietas A, Garber ME, Matsuhashi S, et al. Loss of PDCD4 expression in human lung cancer correlates with tumour progression and prognosis. J Pathol, 2003;200:640–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Srethapakdi M, Liu F, Tavorath R, Rosen N. Inhibition of Hsp90 function by ansamycins causes retinoblastoma gene product-dependent G1 arrest. Cancer Res, 2000;60:3940–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Munster PN, Srethapakdi M, Moasser MM, Rosen N. Inhibition of heat shock protein 90 function by ansamycins causes the morphological and functional differentiation of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res, 2001;61:2945–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Suzuki, R. G. Garces, K. A. Edmonds, S. Hiller, S. G. Hyberts, A. Marintchev, and G. Wagner
PDCD4 inhibits translation initiation by binding to eIF4A using both its MA3 domains
PNAS, March 4, 2008; 105(9): 3274 - 3279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
T. Schmid, A. P. Jansen, A. R. Baker, G. Hegamyer, J. P. Hagan, and N. H. Colburn
Translation Inhibitor Pdcd4 Is Targeted for Degradation during Tumor Promotion
Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1254 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. B. Frankel, N. R. Christoffersen, A. Jacobsen, M. Lindow, A. Krogh, and A. H. Lund
Programmed Cell Death 4 (PDCD4) Is an Important Functional Target of the MicroRNA miR-21 in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2008; 283(2): 1026 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
N. LaRonde-LeBlanc, A. N. Santhanam, A. R. Baker, A. Wlodawer, and N. H. Colburn
Structural Basis for Inhibition of Translation by the Tumor Suppressor Pdcd4
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 147 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Cancer ResHome page
B. Ozpolat, U. Akar, M. Steiner, I. Zorrilla-Calancha, M. Tirado-Gomez, N. Colburn, M. Danilenko, S. Kornblau, and G. Lopez Berestein
Programmed Cell Death-4 Tumor Suppressor Protein Contributes to Retinoic Acid-Induced Terminal Granulocytic Differentiation of Human Myeloid Leukemia Cells
Mol. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 5(1): 95 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
A. Hilliard, B. Hilliard, S.-J. Zheng, H. Sun, T. Miwa, W. Song, R. Goke, and Y. H. Chen
Translational Regulation of Autoimmune Inflammation and Lymphoma Genesis by Programmed Cell Death 4
J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 8095 - 8102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
C. Roldo, E. Missiaglia, J. P. Hagan, M. Falconi, P. Capelli, S. Bersani, G. A. Calin, S. Volinia, C.-G. Liu, A. Scarpa, et al.
MicroRNA Expression Abnormalities in Pancreatic Endocrine and Acinar Tumors Are Associated With Distinctive Pathologic Features and Clinical Behavior
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2006; 24(29): 4677 - 4684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Yu, K. Ganesan, L. D. Miller, and P. Tan
A modular analysis of breast cancer reveals a novel low-grade molecular signature in estrogen receptor-positive tumors.
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3288 - 3296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H.-S. Yang, C. P. Matthews, T. Clair, Q. Wang, A. R. Baker, C.-C. H. Li, T.-H. Tan, and N. H. Colburn
Tumorigenesis Suppressor Pdcd4 Down-Regulates Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase Kinase 1 Expression To Suppress Colon Carcinoma Cell Invasion
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2006; 26(4): 1297 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
A. P. Jansen, C. E. Camalier, and N. H. Colburn
Epidermal Expression of the Translation Inhibitor Programmed Cell Death 4 Suppresses Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 65(14): 6034 - 6041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, N. H.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online