Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Rayes, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Rayes, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, P. A.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:1421-1426
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Cyclooxygenase-2-dependent and -independent effects of celecoxib in pancreatic cancer cell lines

Basil F. El-Rayes1, Shadan Ali1, Fazlul H. Sarkar2 and Philip A. Philip1

Departments of 1 Hematology and Oncology and 2 Pathology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

Requests for reprints: Philip A. Philip, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, 4100 John R. Street, Detroit, MI 48201. Phone: 313-745-8029; Fax: 313-966-2944. E-mail: philipp{at}karmanos.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is involved in inhibition of apoptosis, potentiation of cell growth, and angiogenesis and as such is a target for drug development. The COX-2 enzyme is frequently overexpressed in pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of celecoxib on the growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis by gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Baseline expression of COX-2 enzyme was determined by Western blot analysis in five human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cells were treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), celecoxib (1, 10, and 50 µmol/L), and the combination. No potentiation in growth inhibition was observed in MIAPaCa cells (low COX-2 expression). However, growth inhibition and apoptosis were significantly increased with celecoxib in the BxPC-3 cells that have a high COX-2 expression. Significant down-regulation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation was observed in BxPC-3 cells treated with celecoxib and gemcitabine. Moreover, down-regulation of COX-2 mRNA and protein expression was also observed in the BxPC-3 cells treated with the combination as compared with the untreated and the celecoxib-treated and gemcitabine-treated cell lines. We conclude that celecoxib potentiates gemcitabine-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cell lines. In addition to inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme, the celecoxib and gemcitabine combination down-regulated nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation, which in turn may have contributed to the induction of apoptosis and the down-regulation of transcription of the COX-2 enzyme.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pancreatic cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality. Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is currently considered the optimal treatment for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, the impact of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens in pancreatic cancer has been at best modest (1). Therefore, novel approaches combining gemcitabine with biological agents such as celecoxib in advanced pancreatic cancer are being pursued.

The cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes catalyze the rate-limiting step in the conversion of arachidonic acid into prostaglandins (2). Three isoforms of the COX enzymes have been identified. COX-2, an inducible enzyme, is overexpressed in malignancies including pancreatic cancer (3). Recent evidence suggests that COX-2 has a central role in the development and growth of cancer (3). Increased invasiveness (4) and promotion of angiogenesis (5) have been associated with COX-2 overexpression. COX-2 has antiapoptotic effects (6, 7). In pancreatic cancer, an association between COX-2 expression and perineural invasion has been reported (8). The complex regulation of COX-2 protein expression is mediated through both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms.

Ras mutations are present in up to 90% of pancreatic cancer (9). Expression of mutant k-Ras activates the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, resulting in up-regulation of COX-2 transcription (10). Furthermore, mutant Ras activates the Akt/protein kinase B pathway (11), resulting in stabilization of COX-2 mRNA (12) and activation of the nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) transcriptional factor. Furthermore, prostaglandins such as prostaglandin E2 are known to activate NF-{kappa}B (13), resulting in further transcription of the COX-2 gene (Fig. 1). In turn, NF-{kappa}B transcriptionally up-regulates the expression of the COX-2 gene (14).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. A hypothetical model for NF-{kappa}B and COX-2 pathway interaction. NF-{kappa}B activation via Akt signaling and/or exposure to gemcitabine results in increased transcription of the COX-2 gene and inhibition of apoptosis. The COX-2 enzyme catalyzes the production of prostaglandins (PGE2), which in turn can activate NF-{kappa}B.

 
Selective and nonselective COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to induce apoptosis as well as potentiate the growth inhibitory effects of chemotherapeutic agents including gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines (15–17). Prostaglandins can reverse the growth inhibitory effects of COX-2 inhibitors (7). Therefore, COX-2 is a potential target for chemoprevention and therapy. Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, has been shown previously to inhibit the growth of human pancreatic cancer cell lines (3). In addition to COX-2 inhibition, celecoxib promotes apoptosis through COX-2-independent pathways involving the inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation of the Akt pathway (18–20). Clinical trials indicate an improved safety profile of celecoxib in comparison with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) with respect to gastrointestinal toxicity (21).

The first aim of this study was to investigate the growth inhibitory effects of gemcitabine with celecoxib in pancreatic cancer cell lines. The second aim of the study was to evaluate the contribution of the COX-2 expression on the growth inhibition of the celecoxib and gemcitabine combination. To evaluate this effect, we compared the effects of the two drugs in four pancreatic cancer cell lines with different baseline COX-2 expression levels. The third aim of the study was to determine the COX-2-independent effects of celecoxib. Because celecoxib is also known to inhibit the Akt pathway and to decrease prostaglandin synthesis, we hypothesized that celecoxib inhibits NF-{kappa}B activation leading to apoptosis and down-regulation of COX-2 mRNA and protein expression. Our hypothetical diagram is represented in Fig. 1.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell Culture, Drugs, and Reagents
Human pancreatic cancer cell lines BxPC-3, MIAPaCa, PANC-1, MOH-1, and HPAC were used in this study. BxPC-3 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum. MIAPaCa and PANC-1 cells were grown as a monolayer cell culture in DMEM containing 4.5 mg/mL D-glucose and L-glutamine supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and MOH-1 and HPAC cells were grown in DMEM/F-12 (1:1) with 10% calf serum. Celecoxib and gemcitabine were generous gifts from Pfizer (New York, NY) and Eli Lilly Research Laboratories (Indianapolis, IN), respectively. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), isopropanol, and DMSO were acquired from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Apoptosis detection kit was purchased from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN). Cell culture media were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY).

Cell Viability Assay
The viability of cells treated with gemcitabine, celecoxib, or the combination was determined by the standard MTT reduction assay. BxPC-3, HPAC, PANC-1, and MIAPaCa cells were plated (5-10,000/well) in 96-well plate and incubated overnight at 37°C. Celecoxib was dissolved in DMSO and added to cell culture medium at a volume-to-volume concentration not exceeding 0.1%. The effects of celecoxib (1, 10, or 50 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), and the combination on BxPC-3, HPAC, PANC-1, and MIAPaCa cell lines were studied. The MTT assay was done in triplicates for each drug concentration used. After the required drug treatment time, aliquots of 100 µL MTT (1 mg/mL) were added to each well and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. The supernatant was removed and isopropanol (100 µL) was then added. The color intensity was measured by kinetic microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at 595 nm. DMSO-treated cells were considered untreated control and assigned a value of 100%. Linearity of the color intensity relative to cell number within the range expected in the study was determined at the outset.

Apoptosis Assay
The Cell Death Detection ELISA kit (Roche Applied Science) was used to detect apoptosis in treated BxPC-3 and MIAPaCa cells. The assay is based on a photometric enzyme immunoassay for the qualitative and quantitative determination of cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments (mononucleosome and oligonucleosome). The assay uses anti-histone biotin antibodies that bind to H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 histones and anti-DNA peroxidase antibodies that react with ssDNA and dsDNA. Cells seeded in 96-well plates were treated with celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), or the combination. The cells were trypsinized and ~10,000 cells were added to lysis buffer (500 µL) and incubated at room temperature for 0.5 hour. The cells were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 10 minutes and the supernatant (100 µL) was transferred into anti-histone-coated microtiter plate and incubated at room temperature for 90 minutes. The plate was washed twice with washing solution (200 µL) provided with the kit. A solution containing anti-DNA peroxidase (100 µL) dissolved in incubation buffer was added to the same plate and incubated for 90 minutes. After removal of the unbound antibodies, the nucleosomes were quantified by the peroxidase reaction using 2,2'-azino-di(3-ethylbenzthiazolin-sulfonat) as substrate. A microtiter plate reader at 492 nm read the color intensity.

Immunoblotting for the Expression of COX-2 Protein
BxPC-3, MIAPaCa, MOH-1, HPAC, and PANC-1 cells were used to determine the baseline expression of the COX-2 enzyme. The influence of treatment on COX-2 expression was also determined. BxPC-3 cells were treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L) and/or celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L) for 48 hours, harvested by scraping the cells from culture plates, and collected by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in Tris buffer (125 mmol/L, pH 6.8), sonicated twice for 10 seconds, and lysed using an equal volume of 8% SDS. Cell extracts were boiled for 10 minutes and chilled on ice. Protein concentration was then measured using BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The samples were loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE for separation and electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Each membrane was incubated with monoclonal antibody against COX-2 (1:1,000, Cayman Chemical Co., MI) and polyclonal anti-ß-actin (1:2000, Sigma Chemical). Blots were washed with phosphate buffer containing 0.05% Tween and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with peroxidase. The signal intensity was then measured using chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce). Autoradiograms of the Western blots were scanned with Gel Doc 1000 image scanner (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) that was linked to a Macintosh computer.

Reverse-Transcription PCR for COX-2 mRNA Expression
The influence of treatment on COX-2 mRNA was determined by reverse transcription-PCR. BxPC-3 cells were treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L) and/or celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L) for 48 hours. Culture medium was removed and Trizol (2 mL) was added. The cells were scraped and the lysate was passed through a pipette several times. Chloroform (20 µL) was added and incubated for 2 to 3 minutes before centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 minutes. Isopropanol (500 µL) was added to the aqueous phase, mixed, and incubated at room temperature for few minutes and then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 minutes. The pellet was washed with 80% ethanol and dissolved in RNase-free water. Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed using DTT (0.1 mmol/L), deoxynucleotide triphosphates (1 mmol/L), and random primers (5 pmol/µL), SuperScript II (10 units/µL, Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). Reverse transcription-PCR for COX-2 and ß-actin amplification was done using Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) with COX-2 primer (Oxford Biomedical Research, Inc., Rochester Hills, MI) and actin primer (Sigma Chemical). The PCR conditions were 94°C for 1 minute, 53°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 2 minutes for 35 cycles. PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel and were stained with ethidium bromide.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay for NF-{kappa}B Activation
BxPC-3 cells were treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L) and/or celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L) for 48 hours. The cells were suspended in Triton X-100 lysis buffer (500 µL) containing Tris-HCl (20 mmol/L, pH 7.5), (100 mmol/L) MgCl2, levamisole (50 mmol/L), sodium butyrate (200 mmol/L), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (100 mmol/L), and protein inhibitor (Roche Applied Science), which contain a broad spectrum of serine, cysteine, and metalloproteases. The cells were lysed with 20 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer (Kontes Glass Co., New Jersey, NJ) and centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The nuclear pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of Tris-HCl (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4) and MgCl2 (5 mmol/L) followed by equal volume of NaCl (1 mol/L), Tris-HCl (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4), and MgCl2 (5 mmol/L). The nuclear suspension was incubated on ice for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was quantified using BCA assay (Pierce).

EMSA was done using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System with NF-{kappa}B IRDye-labeled oligonucleotide from LI-COR, Inc. (Lincoln, NE). The DNA binding reaction was set up using nuclear extract (5 µg) mixed with oligonucleotide and gel shift binding buffer consisting of 20% glycerol, MgCl2 (5 mmol/L), EDTA (2.5 mmol/L), DTT (2.5 mmol/L), NaCl (250 mmol/L), Tris-HCl (50 mmol/L, pH 7.5), and polydeoxyinosinic-polydeoxycytidylic acid (0.25 mg/mL). The reaction was incubated at room temperature in dark for 30 minutes. Orange G loading dye (2 µL, 10x) was added to each sample and loaded on the pre-run 8% polyacrylamide gel and ran at 30 mA for 1 hour. NF-{kappa}B p65 antibody and unlabeled NF-{kappa}B oligonucleotide were used to confirm the supershift and the specificity of NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity.

The gel was scanned and the signals were quantified using Odyssey Infrared Imaging System, and Odyssey software (LI-COR). Comparison between untreated and treated cells was done via t test. Statistical significance was assumed for P ≤ 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Baseline Expression of COX-2 in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells
Figure 2 shows the immunoblot for COX-2 expression in BxPC-3, MIAPaCa, MOH-1, HPAC, and PANC-1 cell lines. COX-2 expression was highest in the BxPC-3 cell line followed by MIAPaCa, HPAC, MOH-1, and PANC-1.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Western blot analysis and densitometric measurement of COX-2 expression in BxPC-3, MIAPaCa, HPAC, and PANC-1 human pancreatic cell lines. The COX-2 expression was highest in the BxPC-3 cell line and lowest in PANC-1 cell line. A, Western blot. B, graphic quantitation of COX-2 protein expression using arbitrary units.

 
Effects of Celecoxib and Gemcitabine on the Viability of Pancreatic Cancer Cells
Viability of BxPC-3, MIAPaCa, HPAC, and PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells treated with celecoxib (1, 10, or 50 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), and the combination was determined by the MTT assay. In the BxPC-3 cell line, a potentiation of the growth inhibition of gemcitabine by celecoxib was observed with the 1 µmol/L concentration of celecoxib (Fig. 3A). Although a potentiation of growth inhibition of gemcitabine by celecoxib in MIAPaCa (Fig. 3B), HPAC (Fig. 3C), and PANC-1 (Fig. 3D) cell lines was observed, these did not reach statistical significance. Hence, we selected BxPC-3 and MIAPaCa as higher and lower sensitivity cell lines, respectively, for further studies.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Effect of celecoxib ({square}), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L; {blacksquare}), and the combination ({cjs2106}) on cell viability by the MTT assay. (A) BxPC-3, (B) MIAPaCa, (C) HPAC, and (D) PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells were treated as described under Materials and Methods. Cell viability was calculated relative to untreated cells. There was a significant reduction in cell viability in the BxPC-3 cells treated with gemcitabine and celecoxib as compared with cells treated with either agent alone (P = 0.004). In the MIAPaCa, PANC-1, and HPAC cells, a nonsignificant increase in growth inhibition was observed with the combination over cells treated with either agent alone (P = 0.073, 0.067, and 0.054, respectively).

 
Induction of Apoptosis by Gemcitabine, Celecoxib, and the Combination
The effect of celecoxib (1 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), and the combination was tested using Cell Death Detection ELISA kit. Exposure of BxPC-3 cells to either celecoxib or gemcitabine for 48 hours (Fig. 4A) did not significantly enhance apoptosis. The combination of celecoxib and gemcitabine however resulted in a significant increase in apoptosis. In the MIAPaCa cell line, no increase in apoptosis was noticed with celecoxib, gemcitabine, or the combination (Fig. 4B). Therefore, we selected the BxPC-3 cell line for further studies evaluating the effects of celecoxib on the COX-2 expression and NF-{kappa}B activation in an attempt to study further the mechanisms underlying the potentiation of apoptosis by celecoxib.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Induction of apoptosis in BxPC-3 (A; top, day 1; bottom, day 2) and MIAPaCa (B; top, day 1; bottom, day 2) human pancreatic cancer cells. Cells were treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), celecoxib (1 µmol/L), or the combination as described in Materials and Methods. There was a significant potentiation of apoptosis observed in BxPC-3 cells treated with gemcitabine and celecoxib as compared with cells treated with either drug alone (P = 0.0092). No potentiation of apoptosis was observed in the MIAPaCa cell line (P = 0.23). Control, untreated cells; Gem, gemcitabine-treated cells; Cel, celecoxib-treated cells; Gem + Cel, cells treated with the combination of gemcitabine and celecoxib.

 
Modulation of COX-2 Expression in BxPC-3 Cells Treated with Celecoxib and Gemcitabine
The expression of COX-2 protein was determined in BxPC-3 cells treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L), or the combination (Fig. 5). Neither gemcitabine nor celecoxib resulted in a significant alteration in COX-2 protein expression as measured by immunoblotting. In contrast, the treatment with gemcitabine plus celecoxib resulted in a significant down-regulation of COX-2 expression. To confirm the down-regulation of COX-2, the level of COX-2 mRNA expression was evaluated in BxPC-3 cells treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L), or the combination. A significant down-regulation of COX-2 mRNA was seen in the BxPC-3 cells treated with the combination of the two drugs (Fig. 6).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Western blot analysis of the expression of COX-2 in BxPC-3 cell line untreated and treated with celecoxib (1 or 2 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), or the combination. Significant down-regulation of COX-2 expression was observed in cells treated with gemcitabine and celecoxib. Control, untreated cells; G, gemcitabine-treated cells; C, celecoxib-treated cells; G + C, cells treated with the combination of gemcitabine and celecoxib.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis of the expression of COX-2 mRNA in BxPC-3 cells treated with celecoxib (1 or 2 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), or the combination. Significant down-regulation of COX-2 mRNA expression was observed in the cells treated with gemcitabine and celecoxib. Control, untreated cells; G, gemcitabine-treated cells; C, celecoxib-treated cells; G + C, cells treated with the combination of gemcitabine and celecoxib.

 
Activation of NF-{kappa}B in BxPC-3 Cells Treated with Celecoxib and Gemcitabine
Because NF-{kappa}B plays a critical role in cell survival and COX-2 expression, the NF-{kappa}B activation was determined in BxPC-3 cells treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), celecoxib (1 and 2 µmol/L), or the combination (Fig. 7). Gemcitabine treatment activated NF-{kappa}B at 48 hours, whereas celecoxib resulted in the down-regulation of NF-{kappa}B activation at 48 hours. However, a significant inhibition of NF-{kappa}B was observed in cells treated with the combination of the two drugs for 48 hours, and these results were consistent with our hypothesis as presented in Fig. 1.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7. Determination of NF-{kappa}B activation by EMSA in BxPC-3 cells treated with celecoxib (1 or 2 µmol/L), gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), or the combination. Significant down-regulation of NF-{kappa}B activation was observed in the cell line treated with gemcitabine and celecoxib. Top, NF-{kappa}B DNA binding activity; bottom, quantitation of signals. Control, untreated cells; G, gemcitabine-treated cells; C, celecoxib-treated cells; G + C, cells treated with the combination of gemcitabine and celecoxib.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The COX-2 enzyme is a modulator of carcinogenesis, apoptosis (6), and angiogenesis (4) in pancreatic cancer and as such is a rational target for drug development. The selective COX-2 inhibitor (NS-398) and NSAIDs are known to potentiate the growth inhibitory effects of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines (15). The growth inhibitory effects of gemcitabine and NSAIDs is thought to be mainly due to inhibition of cell cycle progression without a significant impact on apoptosis (15). The relationship between COX-2 expression and the antitumor activity of COX inhibitors is still controversial. Yip-Schneider et al. (17) compared the growth inhibitory effects of indomethacin, sulindac, and NS-398 in three pancreatic cancer cell lines with differing baseline COX-2 expression. Significantly higher growth inhibition was observed in the BxPC-3 cell line as compared with the PaCa-2 cell line, which does not express the COX-2 enzyme. Using a similar design, Molina et al. (16) found no relation between baseline COX-2 expression and growth inhibition with sulindac or NS-398.

In the present study, we evaluated the effects of celecoxib and gemcitabine on the growth and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cell lines with different baseline COX-2 expression. In the BxPC-3 cell line, celecoxib potentiated the growth inhibition of gemcitabine. The effect of the gemcitabine-celecoxib combination on the growth of MIAPaCa, PANC-1, and HPAC cells was less evident. Therefore, it seems that the antitumor effects of celecoxib are partly mediated through inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme and that a low baseline expression of COX-2 enzyme may decrease the benefit from combining celecoxib with gemcitabine. Future clinical trials incorporating celecoxib with chemotherapeutic agents may consider measurement of baseline COX-2 expression as a possible predictor of response.

The growth inhibition of celecoxib in BxPC-3 and MIAPaCa cell lines was concentration dependent. Higher concentrations of celecoxib exceed the levels required to inhibit prostaglandin production by the COX-2 enzyme. Therefore, the observed increase in growth inhibition at these high concentrations of celecoxib suggests that mechanisms other than COX-2 inhibition may be involved in the effects of celecoxib. This observation is supported by previous studies demonstrating the ability of NSAIDs to inhibit the growth of colorectal carcinoma cell lines that lacked COX-1 and COX-2 enzyme expression (22, 23).

The mechanism of growth inhibition observed with celecoxib and gemcitabine seemed to significantly differ between BxPC-3 and MIAPaCa cell lines. In the BxPC-3, the combination resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of cells undergoing apoptosis. In contrast, no increase in apoptosis was observed in the MIAPaCa cell line, and the growth inhibitory effects were likely because of cell cycle arrest as reported previously. If the predominant effect of COX-2 inhibitors including celecoxib in a given pancreatic cell line is G1 arrest (15), then the continuous exposure to celecoxib could attenuate the effects of cell cycle–specific cytotoxic agents such as gemcitabine. Therefore, evaluation of an intermittent versus continuous administration schedule may also be worthy of investigation.

NF-{kappa}B is a transcriptional factor that is involved in a wide spectrum of cellular functions including apoptosis and cell cycle control. NF-{kappa}B is retained in the cytoplasm by the inhibitory protein I{kappa}B (24). Several mediators in the signal transduction pathway including Akt are known to activate NF{kappa}B through phosphorylation of I{kappa}B (12). Activated NF-{kappa}B translocates to the nucleus, resulting in the transcription of several genes (e.g., COX-2). In turn, prostaglandin production (13) can further activate NF-{kappa}B (Fig. 1). Therefore, activation of NF-{kappa}B can result in an exaggerated and sustained effect through the activation of the COX-2 pathway. Celecoxib is known to inhibit the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway in addition to inhibiting prostaglandin production (18, 19, 25). NF-{kappa}B has been shown to inhibit apoptosis in response to chemotherapeutic agents (26) and to promote the transcription of the COX-2 gene (14). Therefore, we assayed the effects of celecoxib, gemcitabine, and the combination on NF-{kappa}B activation. Gemcitabine resulted in a stimulation of NF-{kappa}B activation. The combination of gemcitabine and celecoxib significantly inhibited NF-{kappa}B activation, resulting in an increase in the proportion of cells undergoing apoptosis and down-regulation of the transcription of COX-2 enzyme.

K-Ras mutations is known to increase COX-2 expression through the stabilization of the COX-2 mRNA (11) and the activation of the Akt/NF-{kappa}B pathway (12). The BxPC-3 cell line used in this study has wild-type Ras gene. Therefore, the observed down-regulation of NF-{kappa}B activation and COX-2 expression in the BxPC-3 cell line might not apply to pancreatic cell lines with k-Ras mutations. Preclinical models evaluating the impact of the dysregulation of the different pathways involved in signal transduction including the k-Ras mutations on the observed COX-2-independent effects of celecoxib should be evaluated in future trials.

Although all the NSAIDs and COX-2-specific inhibitors share the ability to inhibit prostaglandin production, their effect on COX-2 expression is variable. Meade et al. (27) showed that NSAIDs induced COX-2 expression in mammary epithelial cells and colon carcinoma cell lines. A similar effect was observed with sulindac and NS-398 in BxPC-3 cell line (16). The induction of COX-2 expression was attributed to the peroxisome proliferative response elements (27), which are induced by COX inhibitors. Elder et al. (28) reported up-regulation of COX-2 expression in colorectal cancer cell lines by NS-398. This up-regulation was mediated through activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway (28). In our study, celecoxib did not induce COX-2 expression, indicating that the COX-2-independent effects of COX inhibitors vary among cell lines.

In conclusion, we found that celecoxib could potentiate the growth inhibition induced by gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. The observed potentiation of growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis is potentially clinically significant considering that it was observed at nanomolar concentrations of gemcitabine that are 100-fold below the peak plasma concentration (10–25 µmol/L) in humans (29). The effects of the gemcitabine and celecoxib are mediated through inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme and the NF-{kappa}B pathway and these observations are consistent with our hypothesis as presented in Fig. 1. Elucidating the COX-2-independent effects of celecoxib could facilitate the identification of patients who may benefit from addition of celecoxib to standard cytotoxic therapy.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 3/26/04; revised 8/10/04; accepted 8/27/04.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. El-Rayes BF, Shields AF, Vaitkevicius V, Philip PA. Developments in the systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Invest 2003;21:73–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Funk CD. Prostaglandins and leukotrienes: advances in eicosanoid biology. Science 2001;294:1871–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ding XZ, Hennig R, Adrian TE. Lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase metabolism: new insights in treatment and chemoprevention of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer 2003;2:10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sheng H, Shao J, Washington MK, DuBois RN. Prostaglandin E2 increases growth and motility of colorectal carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 2001;276:18075–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gately S. The contributions of cyclooxygenase-2 to tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2000;19:19–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Aggarwal S, Taneja N, Lin L, Orringer MB, Rehemtulla A, Beer DG. Indomethacin-induced apoptosis in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells involves upregulation of Bax and translocation of mitochondrial cytochrome c independent of COX-2 expression. Neoplasia 2000;2:346–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Li M, Wu X, Xu XC. Induction of apoptosis by cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor NS398 through a cytochrome c-dependent pathway in esophageal cancer cells. Int J Cancer 2001;93:218–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Merati K, said Siadaty M, Andea A, et al. Expression of inflammatory modulator COX-2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its relationship to pathologic and clinical parameters. Am J Clin Oncol 2001;24:447–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Almoguera C, Shibata D, Forrester K, Martin J, Arnheim N, Perucho M. Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes. Cell 1988;53:549–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Robinson MJ, Cobb MH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997;9:180–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Osada M, Tolkacheva T, Li W, et al. Differential roles of Akt, Rac, and Ral in R-Ras-mediated cellular transformation, adhesion, and survival. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:6333–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sheng H, Shao J, DuBois RN. Akt/PKB activity is required for Ha-Ras-mediated transformation of intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2001;276:14498–504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Poligone B, Baldwin AS. Positive and negative regulation of NF-{kappa}B by COX-2: roles of different prostaglandins. J Biol Chem 2001;276:38658–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schmedtje JF Jr, Ji YS, Liu WL, DuBois RN, Runge MS. Hypoxia induces cyclooxygenase-2 via the NF-{kappa}B p65 transcription factor in human vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 1997;272:601–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Yip-Schneider MT, Sweeney CJ, Jung SH, Crowell PL, Marshall MS. Cell cycle effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and enhanced growth inhibition in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic carcinoma cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;298:976–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Molina MA, Sitja-Arnau M, Lemoine MG, Frazier ML, Sinicrope FA. Increased cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human pancreatic carcinomas and cell lines: growth inhibition by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cancer Res 1999;59:4356–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yip-Schneider MT, Barnard DS, Billings SD, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:139–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Zhu J, Song X, Lin HP, et al. Using cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as molecular platforms to develop a new class of apoptosis-inducing agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1745–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Arico S, Pattingre S, Bauvy C, et al. Celecoxib induces apoptosis by inhibiting 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 activity in the human colon cancer HT-29 cell line. J Biol Chem 2002;277:27613–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lai GH, Zhang Z, Sirica AE. Celecoxib acts in a cyclooxygenase-2-independent manner and in synergy with emodin to suppress rat cholangiocarcinoma growth in vitro through a mechanism involving enhanced Akt inactivation and increased activation of caspases-9 and -3. Mol Cancer Ther 2003;2:265–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Warner TD, Giuliano F, Vojnovic I, Bukasa A, Mitchell JA, Vane JR. Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:7563–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hanif R, Pittas A, Feng Y, et al. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on proliferation and on induction of apoptosis in colon cancer cells by a prostaglandin-independent pathway. Biochem Pharmacol 1996;52:237–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Elder DJ, Halton DE, Hague A, Paraskeva C. Induction of apoptotic cell death in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines by a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug: independence from COX-2 protein expression. Clin Cancer Res 1997;3:1679–83.[Abstract]
  24. Kucharczak J, Simmons MJ, Fan Y, Gelinas C. To be, or not to be: NF-{kappa}B is the answer—role of Rel/NF-{kappa}B in the regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene 2003;22:8961–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Hsu AL, Ching TT, Wang DS, Song X, Rangnekar VM, Chen CS. The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib induces apoptosis by blocking Akt activation in human prostate cancer cells independently of Bcl-2. J Biol Chem 2000;275:11397–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Arlt A, Gehrz A, Muerkoster S, et al. Role of NF-{kappa}B and Akt/PI3K in the resistance of pancreatic carcinoma cell lines against gemcitabine-induced cell death. Oncogene 2003;22:3243–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Meade EA, McIntyre TM, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM. Peroxisome proliferators enhance cyclooxygenase-2 expression in epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 1999;274:8328–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Elder DJ, Halton DE, Playle LC, Paraskeva C. The MEK/ERK pathway mediates COX-2-selective NSAID-induced apoptosis and induced COX-2 protein expression in colorectal carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 2002;99:323–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Du M, Faucher K, Tarassoff P, Plunkett W. Gemcitabine in leukemia: a phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:406–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Ali, S. Banerjee, A. Ahmad, B. F. El-Rayes, P. A. Philip, and F. H. Sarkar
Apoptosis-inducing effect of erlotinib is potentiated by 3,3'-diindolylmethane in vitro and in vivo using an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1708 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Jimeno, M. L. Amador, P. Kulesza, X. Wang, B. Rubio-Viqueira, X. Zhang, A. Chan, J. Wheelhouse, H. Kuramochi, K. Tanaka, et al.
Assessment of celecoxib pharmacodynamics in pancreatic cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 3240 - 3247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Abdelrahim, C. H. Baker, J. L. Abbruzzese, and S. Safe
Tolfenamic acid and pancreatic cancer growth, angiogenesis, and Sp protein degradation.
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 21, 2006; 98(12): 855 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Wang, S. Banerjee, Y. Li, K.M. W. Rahman, Y. Zhang, and F. H. Sarkar
Down-regulation of Notch-1 Inhibits Invasion by Inactivation of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.
Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2778 - 2784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Blanquicett, M. W. Saif, D. J. Buchsbaum, M. Eloubeidi, S. M. Vickers, D. C. Chhieng, M. D. Carpenter, J. C. Sellers, S. Russo, R. B. Diasio, et al.
Antitumor Efficacy of Capecitabine and Celecoxib in Irradiated and Lead-Shielded, Contralateral Human BxPC-3 Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts: Clinical Implications of Abscopal Effects
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8773 - 8781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Ali, B. F. El-Rayes, F. H. Sarkar, and P. A. Philip
Simultaneous targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor and cyclooxygenase-2 pathways for pancreatic cancer therapy
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1943 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Rayes, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Rayes, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, P. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online