
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Cancer Research, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Cancer Research, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285. Phone: (317) 276-1083; Fax: (317) 276-6510; E-mail: bperry{at}Lilly.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MRP1 (MRP1/ABCC1) gene was originally cloned from a multidrug-resistant human small cell lung cancer cell line and encodes a Mr 190,000 protein of 1531 amino acids (2). hMRP1 has a wide tissue distribution, including the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells in most tissues, and hMRP1 is expressed at relatively high levels in lung, testes, and kidney (3). hMRP1 is a primary transporter of GSH, glutathione S-conjugates, and glucuronate- and sulfate-conjugated organic anions, including LTC4 (4). Overexpression of hMRP1 results in multidrug resistance through an ATP-dependent efflux of several important classes of anticancer agents, including anthracyclines, epipodophyllotoxins, and the Vinca alkaloids (5). Transport of some substrates is also GSH dependent. hMRP1 overexpression has been detected in drug-selected cell lines derived from lung, leukemia, breast, bladder, prostate, and cervical cancer (6), supporting a role for hMRP1 in multidrug resistance acquired by tumor cells during chemotherapy. hMRP1 may also play a role in the intrinsic resistance of certain tumor types to chemotherapy because substantial levels of hMRP1 mRNA has been detected in nonselected cell lines derived from thyroid, non-small cell lung carcinomas, gliomas, and neuroblastomas (6).
One approach to overcoming resistance to anticancer agents caused by overexpression of an ABC transporter in human tumors is to develop noncytotoxic inhibitors that can block its transport activity (7). Decreased efflux of an anticancer agent when coadministered with an inhibitor would make the cells more drug sensitive and responsive to therapy. However, blocking the activity of hMRP1 in normal cells could hypersensitize some tissues to the anticancer agent, resulting in dose-limiting toxicities. Such toxicities might be anticipated through the preclinical testing of modulators in an animal model if the substrate specificity of its MRP1 homologue is similar to that of hMRP1.
Despite the high level of sequence identity between human, bovine, canine, and murine MRP1 homologues, only hMRP1 confers resistance to a major class of anticancer agents, the anthracyclines (5, 8 11). To determine whether MRP1 from another animal species used in toxicological studies would be more functionally similar to hMRP1, we cloned and functionally characterized two alleles of the MRP1 homologue from the cynomolgus monkey, Macaca fascicularis (monMRP1). Stable overexpression of monMRP1 cDNAs and hMRP1 in human embryonic kidney (PEAKSTABLE) cells was achieved using an episomal expression vector. These cell lines were characterized with respect to the subcellular localization of MRP1, resistance to anticancer drugs in cytotoxicity assays, and the effects of the hMRP1 inhibitor LY402913 on monMRP1 function. monMRP1 transporters were also functionally evaluated in LTC4 transport assays using membrane vesicles prepared from these cell lines. Our results indicate that monkey and hMRP1 transporters are functionally very similar. However, whereas monMRP1 is the first MRP1 homologue to confer significant levels of anthracycline resistance to transfected cells relative to vector control cells, anthracycline resistance levels were reduced relative to hMRP1 transfected cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Episomal Expression Vector.
The EBNA-1-based episomal expression vector pPEAK10 (Edge Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD) was modified as follows to generate the vector EW1969 used in these studies. This vector encodes a shortened EBNA-1 gene that was modified by the supplier to reduce plasmid size. A 4.9-kb SpeI/NotI fragment of pPEAK10 was ligated to a 2.8-kb MluI/XbaI fragment of pCMV-SEAP (Tropix, Inc., Bedford, MA) after both fragments were blunted by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). A 5.4-kb BamHI fragment of this plasmid was treated with Klenow fragment to create blunt ends and was subsequently digested with NcoI. A 4.9-kb fragment from these digests was ligated to a 0.6-kb NcoI/PvuII fragment of pcDNA3.1-Hygro(+) vector (Invitrogen) containing a portion of the CMV promoter, cloning sites, and polyadenylation signals. The cloning region between the AseI site at the T7 promoter, and the NotI site was replaced by ligating synthetic linkers between these restriction sites. The resulting vector (EW1969) features a shortened EBNA-1 gene/Ori P cassette for episomal expression in mammalian cells (12), an SV40 replication origin for replication in T-antigen-expressing cells, a puromycin resistance gene for selection of stable pools of transfected cells, and a CMV-promoter-polyA signal cassette for high-level expression of cloned genes in mammalian cells. The multicloning region also contains a short segment of the Xenopus laevis ß-globin gene 5' untranslated region that has been reported to increase the translation of some genes (13, 14) in addition to sequences for generation of FLAG and 6-His-tagged proteins (15).
MRP Expression in PEAKSTABLE Cells.
SalI (made blunt with treatment with Klenow fragment)/Not I fragments containing the complete open reading frames of monMRP1A, monMRP1B, and hMRP1 (obtained from Drs. Susan Cole and Roger Deeley, Queens University, Kingston, Canada) were cloned into the EcoRV and NotI sites of EW1969. PEAKSTABLE cells (transformed human embryonic kidney cells that stably express the EBNA-1 gene; Edge Biosystems) were grown in 5% CO2 at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) and 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Invitrogen). The day before transfection, 9 x 105 cells were seeded into a 25-cm2 flask. Cells were transfected with MRP1 constructs in addition to the parental vector using Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the provided protocol. The following day, cells were trypsinized and expanded to a 150-cm2 flask, and puromycin (Edge Biosystems) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 µg/ml. Puromycin selection was considered complete when untransfected cells grown in parallel were completely killed (610 days).
Western Analysis.
Puromycin-selected PEAKSTABLE cells transfected with monMRP1A, monMRP1B, hMRP1, or the EW1969 parental vector were trypsinized, resuspended in growth medium, and centrifuged. The cell pellets were washed once in 5 ml of PBS containing protease inhibitors (Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), centrifuged again, and placed on dry ice. Whole cell lysates were prepared by resuspending the cell pellets at 1 mg/ml in M-PER reagent (Pierce/Endogen, Rockford, IL), centrifuging at 20,000 x g for 15 min and collecting the supernatant. Protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchonic acid protein assay reagent (Pierce/Endogen) as directed by the manufacturer. Samples were loaded at 10 µg/lane onto 8% Novex Tris-Glycine SDS polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen). After transfer onto Optitran supported nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH), both monMRP and hMRP were detected using MRPr1, MRPm6, and QCRL-1 monoclonal antibodies (Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) as the primary and peroxidase-conjugated antirat IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as the secondary with the Renaissance Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagent (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences-NEN, Boston, MA).
Immunostaining.
Cells were grown on 4-well chambered coverglasses (Nalgene, Rochester, NY) as above. Cells were fixed for 10 min in 1% formaldehyde at room temperature, followed by permeabilization for 15 min in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.025% NP40 (Sigma-Aldrich). Background staining was blocked with serum-free protein blocking reagent (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for 30 min. The samples were incubated with anti-MRP1 antibody QCRL-3 (Signet, Dedham, MA) at a 1:10 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. Alexa 488-conjugated goat antimouse (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted 1:500 was used as secondary reagent. The samples were counterstained using propidium iodide (Molecular Probes) at a 1:20 dilution in PBS for 1 min at room temperature. Cells were examined with a MRC-1024 confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Membrane Vesicle Preparation.
Puromycin-selected PEAKSTABLE cells transfected with hMRP1, monMRP1A, monMRP1B, or parental vector were grown in monolayers as described above. Membrane vesicles were prepared as previously described for HeLa-T5 cells (7, 16).
LTC4 Transport Assay.
ATP-dependent transport of LTC4 into inside-out membrane vesicles was measured for 45 s, which was within the linear range of uptake as described previously (7, 16). ATP-dependent LTC4 uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake measured in the presence of adenylyl-(ß,
-methylene)-diphosphonate from the uptake measured in the presence of ATP. The uptake rate was calculated based on the protein content of the membrane vesicles. Protein was determined by the bicinchonic acid protein assay (Pierce/Endogen).
Chemosensitivity Testing.
The tetrazolium salt-based CellTiter 96 cell proliferation assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) was used to determine resistance of the transfected cells to various chemotherapeutic agents in 96-well plates. The cells were plated at 7.5 x 103 cells/well in RPMI medium supplemented with 5% bovine calf serum (Invitrogen). They were exposed to drug 24 h after seeding and incubated for an additional 72 h before assaying for cell activity. Modulation of drug resistance was measured in assays containing 5 µM of the MRP1-selective inhibitor LY402913 (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Ref. 17). Resistance was determined in three to five independent experiments, and within each experiment, assays were carried out in quadruplicate.
Statistical Analysis.
All calculations for analysis of drug resistance data were performed on a log scale (18) and then converted back to the original scale (µg/ml). IC50s were calculated using a 4-parameter logistic fit, and data from multiple experiments were used to calculate mean IC50s ± SE. The fold resistance data in the presence or absence of the MRP1 inhibitor LY402913 were analyzed separately using a two-way ANOVA model with effects for cell line, drug, and their interaction. An experimental effect was included in the model to adjust for between-experiment differences. The final SEs were obtained using the delta method:
![]() |
is the average of the log (IC50) values. LTC4 uptake rates were analyzed by one-way ANOVA on the original scale. The Tukey-Kramer Honestly Significant Difference test was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Overexpression of Monkey and hMRP1 in PEAKSTABLE Cells.
monMRP1 and hMRP1 proteins were expressed in PEAKSTABLE cells using episomally replicating plasmids introduced by transfection and selected with puromycin. Puromycin-resistant cells were analyzed subsequently as a population. Increased MRP1 expression of all three PEAKSTABLE cell lines was shown by Western analysis of whole cell lysates using the two MRP1-specific monoclonal antibodies MRPr1 and MRPm6 (Fig. 2). A Mr 190,000 band was easily detected in lysates containing monMRP1A, monMRP1B, and hMRP1 but was only weakly detectable in control cells upon long exposures to film (Fig. 2 and data not shown). Epitope-mapping studies previously demonstrated that MRPm6 binds to amino acids 238GSDLWSLNKE247 and MRPr1 binds to amino acids 1511PSDLLQQRGL1520 of hMRP1 (22). These epitopes are completely conserved in monMRP1 proteins. Analysis by Western blotting demonstrated that hMRP1, monMRP1A, and monMRP1B were consistently expressed at comparable levels in PEAKSTABLE cells over several months (data not shown). To exclude the possibility that PEAKSTABLE-monMRP1 cell lines expressed significant levels of hMRP1, Western analysis was also performed using a MRP1 monoclonal antibody, the epitope of which is not completely conserved in monMRP1 proteins. QCRL-1 binds to amino acids 918SSYSGDI924 (23), but monMRP1 proteins contain a valine at position 924. Strong staining of a Mr 190,000 protein was observed in hMRP1-transfected cells, but only low-level staining of the endogenous hMRP1 gene was detected in cells transfected with monMRP1A or monMRP1B (Fig. 2). These data are consistent with the overexpression of monkey MRP1 transporters in these cell lines without significant changes in endogenous hMRP1 levels.
|
|
|
|
2.5-fold. This confirms that the major mechanism of drug resistance in these transfected cells is MRP1-mediated and can be modulated by the LY402913 inhibitor that was selected for activity against hMRP1.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To explore the possibility that MRP1 from monkeys would be more functionally similar to hMRP1, we cloned cDNAs encoding MRP1 from the cynomolgus monkey. Two monMRP1 alleles were identified that encode proteins 98% identical to hMRP1 and differ from each other by three residues. It is unknown which allele represents the true wild-type allele because cDNAs representing each allele were derived from a single heterozygote, and the frequency of these alleles in a larger population was not determined. However, both alleles encoded functional transporters with similar activities in LTC4 and cytotoxicity assays. A 114 amino acid region of complete identity between muMRP1 and hMRP1 (residues 11261239) suggested an important role for this region of the protein (19). This region is also completely conserved in monMRP1 transporters. Furthermore, sequence alignment of hMRP1, monMRP1, canMRP1, bMRP1, muMRP1, and rMRP1 revealed only three divergent positions within this region (hMRP1 residues 1176, 1215, and 1218) in support of the earlier prediction (19). To allow functional comparisons between hMRP1, monMRP1A, and monMRP1B proteins, they were independently expressed in human embryonic kidney-derived PEAKSTABLE cells. All three proteins were expressed at comparable levels as assessed by Western blotting. No differences in endogenous hMRP1 expression levels were detected in monMRP1 transfectants when blots were probed with a hMRP1-specific antibody.
Of three residues found to be glycosylated in hMRP1 (N19, N23, and N1006; Ref. 26), two are present in monMRP1 (N19 and N1006), and only N1006 is present in MRP1 from all six species listed above. The glycosylation state of the protein is not expected to directly affect function because underglycosylated MRP1 expressed in insect cells and deglycosylated MRP1 in human cells treated with tunicamycin have essentially normal function (27, 28). However, because the stability and subcellular localization of some proteins is affected by their glycosylation status (29, 30), the subcellular localization of PEAKSTABLE cells expressing hMRP1 and monMRP1 proteins were examined by immunostaining and confocal microscopy. High levels of plasma membrane staining were observed in MRP1 transfectants compared with vector control cells with no apparent difference in the subcellular localization of hMRP1 and monMRP1 proteins.
Functionally, hMRP1 and monMRP1 transporters are very similar. monMRP1 transported the hMRP1 substrate LTC4 into membrane vesicles in an ATP-dependent manner and conferred a significant level of resistance to vincristine and etoposide when compared with vector control cells. Although both alleles of monMRP1 conferred the same relative levels of resistance to vincristine as hMRP1, monMRP1A conferred a lower level of resistance to etoposide when compared with monMRP1B and hMRP1. In contrast to the negligible levels of resistance to the anthracyclines conferred by MRP1 from mice (9, 10), dogs (11), and cows (8), monMRP1 conferred significant levels of resistance to anthracyclines, albeit statistically lower and estimated to be
45% of that conferred by hMRP1. No statistically significant differences between monMRP1A and monMRP1B transfectants were observed for any of the anticancer agents tested.
Through the characterization of mouse/human hybrid proteins, regions of MRP1 important for conferring anthracycline resistance were identified (31). Only hybrid proteins that contained residues 959-1187 or 11881531 of hMRP1 conferred significant resistance to anthracyclines. Site-directed mutagenesis later identified a glutamate at position 1089 in hMRP1 transmembrane domain 14 to be critical for conferring resistance to anthracyclines (32). Substitution of a glutamine with glutamate at the corresponding position in muMRP1 (Q1086E) resulted in a protein that conferred 60% of the anthracycline resistance of hMRP1. Furthermore, bMRP1 and canMRP1 transporters do not contain this glutamine and do not confer resistance to anthracyclines (8, 11). Our results are consistent with those studies because monMRP1 transporters contain the essential glutamine at this position and do confer
45% of the anthracycline resistance of hMRP1. Two additional residues of hMRP1 (R433 and W1246) have also been shown to be important for anthracycline resistance (33, 34) and are conserved in MRP1 from all six species listed above.
Although the COOH-terminal region of muMRP1 that is important for anthracycline resistance (amino acids 955-1528) differs from hMRP1 (amino acids 959-1531) at 47 positions, the corresponding region of monMRP1 differs from hMRP1 at only 8 positions (Fig. 1). Three of these positions in hMRP1 and monMRP1 [983, 1047 (allele A only), and 1286] were previously evaluated in studies of muMRP1. Independent substitution of these residues of hMRP1 into the corresponding positions of muMRP1 (residues 979, 1044, and 1283) had no effect on the ability of the resulting proteins to confer anthracycline resistance (32, 35). At positions 988 and 1410, monMRP1 matches the residue found in MRP1 proteins from two other species that do not confer anthracycline resistance (canMRP1 plus bMRP1 and muMRP1 plus bMRP1, respectively). monMRP1 also differs at three positions (1360, 1523, and 1526) from residues that are identical in hMRP1, canMRP1, bMRP1, muMRP1, and rMRP1, suggesting these changes may affect anthracycline specificity. It is also notable that at 8 positions (117, 147, 182, 351, 368, 546, 581, and 938), hMRP1 differs from MRP1 homologues of the other five species that are all identical at these positions.
Several groups have reported that charged residues associated within or adjacent to transmembrane segments [E1089, K332, H335, D336, R433, and R1249 of hMRP1 (32, 33, 36, 37), K324, K483, R1210, and R1257 of human MRP2 (38), K325, R586, R1206, and E1208 of rat MRP2 (39)] and in NBDs [D579 of cystic fibrosis transmembrane resistance regulator (40)] are important to the transport activity and/or substrate specificity of ABC transporters. In this light, it is interesting that many of the differences between monMRP1 and hMRP1 involve charged residues (positions 287, 344, 351, 460, 573, 640, 723, 880, 927, 937, 938, 1360, 1410, and 1526). Of particular interest are residues L460, R723, K1360, and D1409 in hMRP1 and R460, Q723, R1360, and G1410 in monMRP1 that affect transmembrane region 8, NBD1, NBD2, and NBD2, respectively. Additional studies of monMRP1 should aid in the identification of other residues(s) important for anthracycline resistance and/or differences in the transport of other substrates.
Recently, a novel class of tricyclic isoxazoles was identified in a screen for hMRP1 inhibitors (17). LY402913 is noncytotoxic, reverses hMRP1-mediated drug resistance in HeLa-T5 cells (EC50 of 0.90 µM), and inhibits ATP-dependent LTC4 uptake into membrane vesicles prepared from these cells. This compound also shows selectivity (
22-fold) for hMRP1 versus a related transporter, P-glycoprotein, in HL60/Adr and HL60/Vinc cells (17). To test whether LY402913 inhibits monMRP1, cytotoxicity assays were performed in the presence of 5 µM of this MRP1 inhibitor. LY402913 was equally effective at reversing the MRP1-mediated drug resistance in both monMRP1 and hMRP1 PEAKSTABLE transfectants. GSH-dependent photoaffinity labeling of hMRP1 by another inhibitor in this series, LY475776, was recently demonstrated (41, 42). Those studies identified T1242 and W1246 in hMRP1 as important for LY475776 photoaffinity labeling, and these residues are conserved in monMRP1A and monMRP1B. The data presented here predict that the binding site for this class of inhibitors is conserved in monMRP1. Photoaffinity labeling studies using membranes prepared from monMRP1 transfectants should help confirm this prediction.
In summary, we have cloned MRP1 cDNAs from the cynomolgus monkey and functionally characterized monMRP1- and hMRP1-transfected cells with respect to subcellular localization, drug resistance conferred, transport of LTC4 into membrane vesicles, and modulation of resistance by LY402913. In most respects, monkey MRP1 function is very similar to that of hMRP1. The cynomolgus monkey is the first animal model and the only toxicology model identified with an MRP1 homologue capable of conferring significant resistance to the anthracycline class of anticancer agents. monMRP1 is also inhibited by a MRP1-selective modulator selected for activity against hMRP1. It is surprising, however, that monMRP1 transporters confer significantly less resistance to anthracyclines than hMRP1 despite 98% identity at the protein level. These functional differences between human and monkey MRP1 transporters will need to be consid-ered when designing pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies for the preclinical evaluation of MRP1 modulators.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indi-cate this fact.
Received 11/19/02; revised 12/16/02; accepted 1/ 3/03.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold.EMBO J.
,
1:945
951,1982
.[Medline]
Hipfner, D. R., Gao, M., Scheffer, G., Scheper, R. J., Deeley, R. G., and Cole, S. P. C. Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies specific for the 190-kDa multidrug resistance protein (MRP).Br. J. Cancer
,
78:1134
1140,1998
.[Medline]
Hipfner, D. R., Almquist, K. C., Stride, B. D., Deeley, R. G., and Cole, S. P. C. Location of a protease-hypersensitive region in the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) by mapping of the epitope of MRP-specific monoclonal antibody QCRL-1.Cancer Res.
,
56:3307
3314,1996
.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. G. Deeley, C. Westlake, and S. P. C. Cole Transmembrane Transport of Endo- and Xenobiotics by Mammalian ATP-Binding Cassette Multidrug Resistance Proteins. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 849 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dallas, D. S. Miller, and R. Bendayan Multidrug resistance-associated proteins: expression and function in the central nervous system. Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2006; 58(2): 140 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pratt, R. L. Shepard, R. A. Kandasamy, P. A. Johnston, W. Perry III, and A. H. Dantzig The multidrug resistance protein 5 (ABCC5) confers resistance to 5-fluorouracil and transports its monophosphorylated metabolites Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2005; 4(5): 855 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sampath, P. R. Long, R. L. Shepard, X. Xia, V. Devanarayan, G. E. Sandusky, W. L. Perry III, A. H. Dantzig, M. Williamson, M. Rolfe, et al. Human SPF45, a Splicing Factor, Has Limited Expression in Normal Tissues, Is Overexpressed in Many Tumors, and Can Confer a Multidrug-Resistant Phenotype to Cells Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 163(5): 1781 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |