Molecular Cancer Therapeutics CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 6, 147-153, January 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0371
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sha, S.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Kawabe, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sha, S.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Kawabe, T.

Research Articles: Therapeutics, Targets, and Development

Cell cycle phenotype-based optimization of G2-abrogating peptides yields CBP501 with a unique mechanism of action at the G2 checkpoint

Shi-Ken Sha1, Takuji Sato1, Hidetaka Kobayashi1, Machiyo Ishigaki1, Sayaka Yamamoto1, Hitoshi Sato1, Asako Takada1, Sigetosi Nakajyo1, Yasuo Mochizuki1, Jonathan M. Friedman2, Fong-Chi Cheng3, Takashi Okura4, Ryohei Kimura4, Donald W. Kufe5, Daniel D. VonHoff6 and Takumi Kawabe1

1 CanBas Co. Ltd., Numazu, Japan; 2 Fazix Co., New York, New York; 3 MDS Pharma Services, Taipei, Taiwan; 4 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan; 5 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and 6 Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Requests for reprints: Takumi Kawabe, CanBas Co. Ltd., Makiya Building 5F, 9 Tooriyoko-cho, Numazu 410-0891, Japan. Phone: 81-55-954-3666; Fax: 81-55-954-3668. E-mail: takumi{at}canbas.co.jp

Abstract

Cell cycle G2 checkpoint abrogation is an attractive strategy for sensitizing cancer cells to DNA-damaging anticancer agent without increasing adverse effects on normal cells. However, there is no single proven molecular target for this therapeutic approach. High-throughput screening for molecules inhibiting CHK1, a kinase that is essential for the G2 checkpoint, has not yet yielded therapeutic G2 checkpoint inhibitors, and the tumor suppressor phenotypes of ATM and CHK2 suggest they may not be ideal targets. Here, we optimized two G2 checkpoint-abrogating peptides, TAT-S216 and TAT-S216A, based on their ability to reduce G2 phase accumulation of DNA-damaged cells without affecting M phase accumulation of cells treated with a microtubule-disrupting compound. This approach yielded a peptide CBP501, which has a unique, focused activity against molecules that phosphorylate Ser216 of CDC25C, including MAPKAP-K2, C-Tak1, and CHK1. CBP501 is >100-fold more potent than TAT-S216A and retains its selectivity for cancer cells. CBP501 is unusually stable, enters cells rapidly, and increases the cytotoxicity of DNA-damaging anticancer drugs against cancer cells without increasing adverse effects. These findings highlight the potency of CBP501 as a G2-abrogating drug candidate. This report also shows the usefulness of the cell cycle phenotype-based protocol for identifying G2 checkpoint-abrogating compounds as well as the potential of peptide-based compounds as focused multitarget inhibitors. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(1):147–53]


Footnotes

Grant support: Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry; Shizuoka Organization for Creation of Industries; Toyota Motor Co. Ltd.; and Olympus Co. Ltd.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 6/26/06; revised 11/ 6/06; accepted 11/16/06.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.