
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Articles: Therapeutics
Tumor pH controls the in vivo efficacy of weak acid and base chemotherapeutics
Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Leo E. Gerweck, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114. Phone: 617-726-8145; Fax: 617-724-5841. E-mail: lgerweck{at}partners.org
The extracellular pH of tumor tissue is significantly lower than the extracellular pH of normal tissue, whereas the intracellular pH of both tissues is similar. In principle, extracellular acidity may be expected to enhance the intracellular uptake and cytotoxicity of weak acid chemotherapeutics that are membrane permeable in their uncharged state and inhibit the efficacy of weak bases. However, procedures for assessing the role of the gradient as a determinant of drug efficacy in vivo by altering the pH gradient may also alter drug availability and thus mask or exaggerate the effect of the gradient change. In the present study, we have altered the extracellular pH of tumors and compared the effect of the resultant pH gradient change on the efficacy of a weak acid versus a weak base. This experimental design gives rise to a change in the ratio of chlorambucil- to doxorubicin-induced tumor growth delay, independent of possible changes in drug availability. The extracellular pH of the 54A human tumor in NCr/Sed/nu/nu mice was altered by administration of 5 mg/g i.v. glucose. The resultant 0.2 pH unit increase in the tumor cell pH gradient gives rise to a predicted 2.3-fold increase in the ratio of chlorambucil to doxorubicin growth delay. The experimentally measured change in the growth delay ratio was 2.1. The results provide compelling evidence that the pH gradient in a determinant of the efficacy of weak electrolytes in the complex in vivo environment and may be exploited for the treatment of cancer. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(5):12759]
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 1/16/06; revised 2/28/06; accepted 3/24/06.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. C. Ramsay, M. Anantha, J. Zastre, M. Meijs, J. Zonderhuis, D. Strutt, M. S. Webb, D. Waterhouse, and M. B. Bally Irinophore C: A Liposome Formulation of Irinotecan with Substantially Improved Therapeutic Efficacy against a Panel of Human Xenograft Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 14(4): 1208 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Tredan, C. M. Galmarini, K. Patel, and I. F. Tannock Drug Resistance and the Solid Tumor Microenvironment J Natl Cancer Inst, October 3, 2007; 99(19): 1441 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Provent, M. Benito, B. Hiba, R. Farion, P. Lopez-Larrubia, P. Ballesteros, C. Remy, C. Segebarth, S. Cerdan, J. A. Coles, et al. Serial In vivo Spectroscopic Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lactate and Extracellular pH in Rat Gliomas Shows Redistribution of Protons Away from Sites of Glycolysis Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7638 - 7645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |