
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; 2 Sirna Therapeutics, Inc., Boulder, Colorado; and 3 Chiron Corp., Emeryville, California
Requests for reprints: David E. Weng, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Desk R-35, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. Phone: 216-444-8375; Fax: 216-444-9464. E-mail: wengd{at}ccf.org
Purpose: This study intended to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetic variables, clinical response, and pharmacodynamic markers of daily s.c. administration of Angiozyme. Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled in a dose escalation and expanded cohort design. Dose escalation involved cohorts of patients at doses of 10, 30, 100, or 300 mg/m2/d for 29 days. A second component enrolled 15 additional patients at a daily dose of 100 mg/m2. Patients were eligible to continue on therapy until disease progression. Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 28 were evaluable (range, 29505 days; median, 89.5 days). A maximum tolerated dose was not defined by toxicity but rather by the maximal deliverable dose of 300 mg/m2/d. Grade 1 to 2 injection site reactions were the most common toxicities. One patient in the 300 mg/m2 group experienced a reversible grade 3 injection site reaction. Angiozyme showed dose-dependent plasma concentrations with good bioavailability. Surrogate markers showed Angiozyme localization in tumor biopsies and a significant increase in serum von Willebrand factor antigen, a marker for endothelial cell dysfunction. Although Angiozyme-reactive antibody production was noted for some patients, no antibody-related adverse events were noted. Seven of 28 (25%) evaluable patients had stable disease for
6 months, with the longest treatment duration of
16 months. Two patients (nasopharyngeal carcinoma and melanoma) showed minor responses. Conclusion: Angiozyme was well tolerated with satisfactory pharmacokinetic variables for daily s.c. dosing. Results have provided the basis for subsequent clinical trials of this first-of-class biologically targeted therapeutic.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 8/17/04; revised 3/ 1/05; accepted 4/13/05.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Bhindi, R. G. Fahmy, H. C. Lowe, C. N. Chesterman, C. R. Dass, M. J. Cairns, E. G. Saravolac, L.-Q. Sun, and L. M. Khachigian Brothers in Arms: DNA Enzymes, Short Interfering RNA, and the Emerging Wave of Small-Molecule Nucleic Acid-Based Gene-Silencing Strategies Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2007; 171(4): 1079 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ishizaki, T. Tsunoda, S. Wada, M. Yamauchi, M. Shibuya, and H. Tahara Inhibition of tumor growth with antiangiogenic cancer vaccine using epitope peptides derived from human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1. Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 12(19): 5841 - 5849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |