
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77840 [S. K., E. R. D.]; Departments of Pathology [E. R. D., I. S., S. R. H., G. N. F., W. Z.] and Biostatistics [K. R. H.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030; and Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4470 [S. K., J. M. T.]
One goal for the gene expression profiling of cancer tissues is to identify signature genes that robustly distinguish different types or grades of tumors. Such signature genes would ideally provide a molecular basis for classification and also yield insight into the molecular events underlying different cancer phenotypes. This study applies a recently developed algorithm to identify not only single classifier genes but also gene sets (combinations) for use as glioma classifiers. Classifier genes identified by this algorithm are shown to be strong features by conservatively and collectively considering the misclassification errors of the feature sets. Applying this approach to a test set of 25 patients, we have identified the best single genes and two- to three-gene combinations for distinguishing four types of glioma: (a) oligodendroglioma; (b) anaplastic oligodendroglioma; (c) anaplastic astrocytoma; and (d) glioblastoma multiforme. Some of the identified genes, such as insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2, have been confirmed to be associated with one of the tumor types. Using combinations of genes, the classification error rate can be significantly lowered. In many instances, neither of the individual genes of a two-gene set performs well as an accurate classifier, but the combination of the two genes forms a robust classifier with a small error rate. Two-gene and three-gene combinations thus provide robust classifiers possessing the potential to translate expression microarray results into diagnostic histopathological assays for clinical utilization.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. P. Petalidis, A. Oulas, M. Backlund, M. T. Wayland, L. Liu, K. Plant, L. Happerfield, T. C. Freeman, P. Poirazi, and V. P. Collins Improved grading and survival prediction of human astrocytic brain tumors by artificial neural network analysis of gene expression microarray data Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2008; 7(5): 1013 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O.-H. Lee, J. Xu, J. Fueyo, G. N. Fuller, K. D. Aldape, M. M. Alonso, Y. Piao, T.-J. Liu, F. F. Lang, B. N. Bekele, et al. Expression of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Tie2 in Neoplastic Glial Cells Is Associated with Integrin {beta}1-Dependent Adhesion to the Extracellular Matrix Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 4(12): 915 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Choudhary, M. Brun, J. Hua, J. Lowey, E. Suh, and E. R. Dougherty Genetic test bed for feature selection Bioinformatics, April 1, 2006; 22(7): 837 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. A. Koike Folgueira, D. M. Carraro, H. Brentani, D. F. da Costa Patrao, E. M. Barbosa, M. M. Netto, J. R. F. Caldeira, M. L. H. Katayama, F. A. Soares, C. T. Oliveira, et al. Gene Expression Profile Associated with Response to Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7434 - 7443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Mount and R. Pandey Using bioinformatics and genome analysis for new therapeutic interventions Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1636 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Schwartz, R. J. Weil, R. C. Thompson, Y. Shyr, J. H. Moore, S. A. Toms, M. D. Johnson, and R. M. Caprioli Proteomic-Based Prognosis of Brain Tumor Patients Using Direct-Tissue Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7674 - 7681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Vogel, Z. Zhuang, J. Li, H. Okamoto, M. Furuta, Y.-S. Lee, W. Zeng, E. H. Oldfield, A. O. Vortmeyer, and R. J. Weil Proteins and Protein Pattern Differences between Glioma Cell Lines and Glioblastoma Multiforme Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 11(10): 3624 - 3632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pal, A. Datta, A. J. Fornace Jr, M. L. Bittner, and E. R. Dougherty Boolean relationships among genes responsive to ionizing radiation in the NCI 60 ACDS Bioinformatics, April 15, 2005; 21(8): 1542 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Freije, F. E. Castro-Vargas, Z. Fang, S. Horvath, T. Cloughesy, L. M. Liau, P. S. Mischel, and S. F. Nelson Gene Expression Profiling of Gliomas Strongly Predicts Survival Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 64(18): 6503 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Mell, J. J. Meyer, M. Tretiakova, A. Khramtsov, C. Gong, S. D. Yamada, A. G. Montag, and A. J. Mundt Prognostic Significance of E-Cadherin Protein Expression in Pathological Stage I-III Endometrial Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5546 - 5553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |